TABLE OF CONTENTS
REPORTS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEES
AND OTHER COMMITTEES
As Considered by
The Council of the City of Toronto
on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999
STRATEGIC POLICIES AND PRIORITIES COMMITTEE
REPORT No. 10
1 Incorporation of the Toronto Hydro Corporation
2 Resources for Access and Equity Functions and Final Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity
3 Smog Prevention and Reduction: Status Report and Work Plan
4 Review and Harmonization of Environmentally Responsible Procurement
5 Summary of the City of Toronto's Response to the Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force and Implementation Plan
6 Community Based Affordable Housing Demonstration Project 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West at Allen Road (Ward 8 - North York Spadina)
7 Housing First Policy for Surplus City-owned Property
8 1998 Adjustments within Consolidated Grants
9 Minor Recreation Grants - Eligibility Assessment of New Applicants
10 Toronto Heritage Fund Grants Program
11 Graffiti Transformation Program - 1999 Recommended Allocations
12 Community Services Grants Program - Eligibility Assessment of New Applicants
13 1999 Recommended Grants Contingency Budget
14 Distribution of the Reallocated Grants Funding
15 Allocation Criteria for a Food Related Capital Grants Program
16 Prepayment Interest and Discount on Advance Payment of Realty Taxes
17 Street Tree Planting Application - Toronto Atmospheric Fund Ward 10 (North York Centre) and Ward 12 (North York Seneca Heights)
18 Transmittal of Evaluation of the Leaside Neighbourhood Branch Library - Capital Budget Project
19 Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto
20 Homes for the Aged - 1999 Operating Budget
21 Use of Sponsorship Revenues from Molson's Sponsorship Agreement for the Construction of Water Park Facilities (Wards 19 and 25 - High Park and Don River)
22 1999 Operating Budget - Follow Up Items
23 Big City Mayors Caucus of the FCM - April 29, 1999 Saskatoon Meeting Report
24 Greater Toronto Services Board 1999 Budget and Business Plan
25 Year 2000 Priority One Business Functions Status Report May 1999
City of Toronto
REPORT No. 10
OF THE STRATEGIC POLICIES AND PRIORITIES COMMITTEE
(from its meeting on June 1, 1999,
submitted by Mayor Mel Lastman , Chair)
As Considered by
The Council of the City of Toronto
on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999
1
Incorporation of the Toronto Hydro Corporation
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by:
(a) deleting Recommendation No. (1)(i) of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
embodied in the confidential communication dated June 1, 1999, from the City Clerk, viz.:
"(i) amending Section (2.2) (b) to read as follows:
'(2.2)(b) the Shareholder's income stream from Toronto Hydro be comparable
to the Shareholder's estimated financial value as determined by an
independent financial evaluation from time-to-time.' ";
so that the recommendations of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee shall now
read as follows:
"The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends:
(1) the adoption of the confidential report (May 20, 1999) from the Chief Administrative
Officer, subject to the following amendments to Appendix 1, entitled 'City of Toronto,
Shareholder Direction Relating to Toronto Hydro Corporation', embodied in the
aforementioned confidential report:
(ii) amending Section 2.3 by adding thereto the following additional principle:
'2.3 (i) that Toronto Hydro will operate in a manner which
will protect and enhance the City's urban forest.';
and
(iii) amending Section 7.1 to read as follows:
'7.1 The Board will use its best efforts to ensure that Toronto
Hydro meets the financial performance standards set out in
this Article 7.'; and
(2) that the Business Plan for Toronto Hydro Services address:
(i) the level of risk of this venture;
(ii) the expected subsidies from Toronto Hydro to Toronto Hydro Services for
start up costs; and
(iii) the point in time when the one-third dividend from Toronto Hydro will
cease."; and
(b) adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that:
(1) the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro be requested to submit a report to Council,
through the Policy and Finance Committee, by September 1999, on:
(i) how it is addressing the need, not only in an 'ice storm' eventuality, but also
on the general need, for underground wiring in older parts of the City; and
(ii) the capital requirements and projected allocations for such purpose;
(2) the Board of Directors of the Toronto Hydro Corporation be directed to:
(i) examine the issue of harmonization of rates across the new City, specifically
as it relates to whether any changes to the harmonization policy adopted by
the former Hydro Corporation should be made, with a view to phasing in that
harmonization over a time frame similar to that adopted by the new City with
respect to water rates, user fees and snow removal services; and
(ii) report thereon to the Policy and Finance Committee by September 1999;
(3) any hydro programs with respect to telecommunications and telecommunications
access agreements be co-ordinated with the Chief Administrative Officer, through
the Telecommunications Steering Committee;
(4) the Chief Administrative Officer be requested to submit a report to the Policy and
Finance Committee on the potential avenues, such as conditions on licences issued
by the Ontario Energy Board, that could be undertaken by the City to accomplish the
City's environmental goals with the other electricity providers;
(5) the Chief Administrative Officer and the Board of Directors of the Toronto Hydro
Corporation be requested to submit a joint report to the Works Committee on
Toronto Hydro's planned approach to achieve deep lake water cooling and an
integrated district cooling system for Toronto;
(6) Council express its appreciation to the staff of the Chief Administrator's Office and
other Departmental staff involved with this matter for their exemplary work in this
regard; and
(7) the following motion be referred to the Chief Administrative Officer for report
thereon to the Policy and Finance Committee by September 1999:
Moved by Councillor Adams:
'That the Clause be amended by adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that City Council provide the following
additional directions to the Board of Directors of the Toronto Hydro
Corporation:
That:
(1) Toronto Hydro's retail company offer a variety of energy
purchase programs which provide opportunities for
consumers to purchase clean or green electricity and energy
efficiency services;
(2) the retail company's marketing strategy encourage the use of
clean or green energy;
(3) the business plan of Toronto Hydro include a strategy to
reduce the company's reliance on energy generation which
emits CO2, SO2 and NOx;
(4) Ontario Power Generation, the current primary supplier of
electricity for Toronto Hydro, be encouraged to make
available a choice of electricity sources which are clean or
green, so that Toronto Hydro can buy clean power, especially
on smog days; and
(5) Toronto Hydro purchase clean power on smog days,
regardless of price, up to a maximum premium of 50 percent
above market rates, when this choice is available to meet its
default supply demand on smog days." ' ")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendations of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee embodied in the
confidential communication (June 1, 1999) from the City Clerk which was forwarded to
Members of Council under confidential cover.
--------
The Chief Administrative Officer and Mr. David McFadden, Legal Advisor, Smith Lyons, Barristers
and Solicitors, gave an overhead presentation to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee in
connection with the foregoing matter.
The following Members of Council appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
in connection with the foregoing matter:
- Councillor Mario Silva, Trinity Niagara; and
- Councillor Jack Layton, Don River.
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing
Clause, the following confidential communication (June 1, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendations:
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends:
(1) the adoption of the confidential report (May 20, 1999) from the Chief Administrative
Officer subject to the following amendments to Appendix 1, entitled "City of Toronto,
Shareholder Direction Relating to Toronto Hydro Corporation", embodied in the
aforementioned confidential report:
(i) amending Section 2.2 (b) to read as follows:
"(2.2) (b) the Shareholder's income stream from Toronto Hydro be
comparable to the Shareholder's estimated financial value
as determined by an independent financial evaluation from
time-to-time.";
(ii) amending Section 2.3 by adding thereto the following additional principle:
"2.3 (i) that Toronto Hydro will operate in a manner which will
protect and enhance the City's urban forest.";
(iii) amending Section 7.1 to read as follows:
"7.1 The Board will use its best efforts to ensure that Toronto Hydro
meets the financial performance standards set out in this
Article 7."; and
(2) that the Business Plan for Toronto Hydro Services addresses:
(i) the level of risk of this venture;
(ii) the expected subsidies from Toronto Hydro to Toronto Hydro Services for start up
costs; and
(iii) the point in time when the one-third dividend from Toronto Hydro will cease.
Background:
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on June 1, 1999, at its in-camera meeting, had
before it a confidential report (May 20, 1999) from the Chief Administrative Officer recommending
that:
(1) the City retain ownership of Toronto Hydro for the foreseeable future and that the City's
ownership be re-evaluated if the financial return is not sustained at a level comparable to
the City's cost of new debt issuance;
(2) Council leave open the option for Toronto Hydro to develop and invest in the non-regulated,
competitive businesses permitted by legislation wherever there is a good business case, risks
are reasonable, and returns are satisfactory;
(3) the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro Corporation provide for Council's information an
overall business strategy indicating the businesses it intends to develop, the forecasted
investment required, and the financial and environmental benefits to Toronto Hydro, the City
and consumers and the Board of Directors be authorized to assess individual initiatives and
commit resources in accordance with the strategy;
(4) Council endorse the following as the City's objectives in structuring its relationship with
Toronto Hydro:
(a) the value of the corporation be maintained or increased;
(b) the City's income stream from Toronto Hydro be comparable to the City's estimated
financial benefit if the asset had been sold;
(c) consumers not be unduly impacted by the change in structure; and
(d) environmental impacts be improved;
(5) Council authorize the incorporation of Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited as the
distribution company, Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. as the competitive company, and
Toronto Hydro Corporation as the holding company, wholly owned by the City of Toronto,
which owns the shares of the aforementioned two corporations and authorize the City
Solicitor to file the Articles of Incorporation;
(6) the Board of Directors of the Toronto Hydro Corporation, who were appointed by Council,
in turn appoint the members to the boards of directors of the two subsidiaries from among
its own members and in accordance with Provincial regulations;
(7) in addition to the following approvals required by the shareholder under the Ontario
Business Corporation's Act:
(a) amendments to the articles of incorporation or by-laws of the corporation;
(b) plans to amalgamate or incorporate under other jurisdictions;
(c) plans to dissolve the company;
(d) changes to the share structure;
(e) sale of substantially all of the corporation's assets;
(f) appointment of the auditor; and
(g) changes to the structure and membership of the Board of Directors;
the following additional matters be approved by City Council as shareholder:
(h) any recommended financial assistance to directors or officers of the corporation or
subsidiaries;
(i) capital investments in the distribution company significantly above those anticipated
in the initial business plan;
(j) expansion of the area of service of the distribution system beyond the City of
Toronto; and
(k) investment in other than approved classes of securities and debt instruments;
(8) Council appoint Ernst & Young, Chartered Accountants as the first auditor of the Toronto
Hydro Corporation and its subsidiaries;
(9) the City Clerk be named the voting proxy for the City as shareholder to convey to the Board
of Directors any decisions made by Council respecting the Toronto Hydro Corporation;
(10) the Board of Directors develop corporate by-laws for approval by Council and include
specifically a policy requiring submission of receipts for reimbursement of out-of-pocket
expenses for board members;
(11) the following control mechanisms be implemented in addition to any regulatory
requirements of the Ontario Energy Board and the right of Council to replace any or all
members of the Board of Directors at any time:
(a) an annual business plan be reviewed by the City Chief Financial Officer to ensure
consistency with the City's overall financial and strategic expectations as outlined
in the Shareholder's Direction from time to time and the Chief Financial Officer
report any irregularities to Council recommending appropriate action;
(b) quarterly reports be submitted to the City Chief Financial Officer and annual
consolidated financial statements be submitted by the Board of Directors to Council;
and
(c) the City Chief Financial Officer and City Auditor or their designates be granted
unrestricted access to the books and records of the corporation and subsidiaries
during normal business hours;
(12) the City's consideration upon transfer of the assets to Toronto Hydro consist of 40 percent
equity and 60 percent debt to the City;
(13) upon transfer of the assets to the new Toronto Hydro Corporation, the City retain cash
deemed as surplus to the immediate needs of Toronto Hydro and any surplus properties
which may be useful or sellable by the City as listed in Schedule E of the attached Transfer
By-Law;
(14) initially, the financial expectations for Toronto Hydro be stated as follows:
(a) the distribution company maintain a financial structure and risk profile that will
achieve a credit rating of A (low) or higher;
(b) annual capital expenditures in excess of the normal maintenance requirements be
approved by Council;
(c) the distribution company be authorized to set distribution rates in accordance with
the regulations forthcoming from the OEB; and
(d) the quarterly dividend paid to the City be equal to 2/3 of the increase in cash of the
distribution company after allowances have been made for operating and capital
needs, the balance being retained by Toronto Hydro for investment in its competitive
business;
(15) all proceeds of the debt and dividends from Toronto Hydro be used toward the existing City
capital obligations and not be used to increase City operating expenses;
(16) the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee endorse in principle the terms of the
Shareholder Direction and the Transfer By-Law as attached in Appendices 1 and 2 of this
report and that, if necessary, the City Solicitor finalize the form of these documents for
approval by Council; and
(17) the appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
The Chief Administrative Officer and Mr. David McFadden, Q.C., Legal Adviser, Smith Lyons,
Barristers and Solicitors, gave an overhead presentation to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee in connection with the foregoing matter.
The following Members of Council appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
in connection with the foregoing matter:
- Councillor Mario Silva, Trinity Niagara; and
- Councillor Jack Layton, Don River.
(Report dated May 20, 1999,
addressed to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee,
from the Chief Administrative Officer.)
Purpose:
This report provides an overview of the options available to the City in responding to the Electricity
Competition Act (Bill 35), recommends a course of action for the City, and proposes terms of the
documents required to implement those actions.
Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Incorporation of the Toronto Hydro Corporation as a share capital corporation under the Ontario
Business Corporations Act with the City as the sole shareholder presents the opportunity for the City
to realize significant new revenues from surplus funds and future profits of Toronto Hydro.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the City retain ownership of Toronto Hydro for the foreseeable future and that the City's
ownership be re-evaluated if the financial return is not sustained at a level comparable to
the City's cost of new debt issuance;
(2) Council leave open the option for Toronto Hydro to develop and invest in the non-regulated,
competitive businesses permitted by legislation wherever there is a good business case, risks
are reasonable, and returns are satisfactory;
(3) the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro Corporation provide for Council's information an
overall business strategy indicating the businesses it intends to develop, the forecasted
investment required, and the financial and environmental benefits to Toronto Hydro, the City
and consumers and the Board of Directors be authorized to assess individual initiatives and
commit resources in accordance with the strategy;
(4) Council endorse the following as the City's objectives in structuring its relationship with
Toronto Hydro:
(a) the value of the corporation be maintained or increased;
(b) the City's income stream from Toronto Hydro be comparable to the City's estimated
financial benefit if the asset had been sold;
(c) consumers not be unduly impacted by the change in structure; and
(d) environmental impacts be improved;
(5) Council authorize the incorporation of Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited as the
distribution company, Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. as the competitive company, and
Toronto Hydro Corporation as the holding company, wholly owned by the City of Toronto,
which owns the shares of the aforementioned two corporations and authorize the City
Solicitor to file the Articles of Incorporation;
(6) the Board of Directors of the Toronto Hydro Corporation, who were appointed by Council,
in turn appoint the members to the boards of directors of the two subsidiaries from among
its own members and in accordance with Provincial regulations;
(7) in addition to the following approvals required by the shareholder under the Ontario
Business Corporation's Act:
(a) amendments to the articles of incorporation or by-laws of the corporation;
(b) plans to amalgamate or incorporate under other jurisdictions;
(c) plans to dissolve the company;
(d) changes to the share structure;
(e) sale of substantially all of the corporation's assets;
(f) appointment of the auditor; and
(g) changes to the structure and membership of the Board of Directors;
the following additional matters be approved by City Council as shareholder:
(h) any recommended financial assistance to directors or officers of the corporation or
subsidiaries;
(i) capital investments in the distribution company significantly above those anticipated
in the initial business plan;
(j) expansion of the area of service of the distribution system beyond the City of
Toronto; and
(k) investment in other than approved classes of securities and debt instruments;
(8) Council appoint Ernst & Young, Chartered Accountants as the first auditor of the Toronto
Hydro Corporation and its subsidiaries;
(9) the City Clerk be named the voting proxy for the City as shareholder to convey to the Board
of Directors any decisions made by Council respecting the Toronto Hydro Corporation;
(10) the Board of Directors develop corporate by-laws for approval by Council and include
specifically a policy requiring submission of receipts for reimbursement of out-of-pocket
expenses for board members;
(11) the following control mechanisms be implemented in addition to any regulatory requirements
of the Ontario Energy Board and the right of Council to replace any or all members of the
Board of Directors at any time:
(a) an annual business plan be reviewed by the City Chief Financial Officer to ensure
consistency with the City's overall financial and strategic expectations as outlined
in the Shareholder's Direction from time to time and the Chief Financial Officer
report any irregularities to Council recommending appropriate action;
(b) quarterly reports be submitted to the City Chief Financial Officer and annual
consolidated financial statements be submitted by the Board of Directors to Council;
and
(c) the City Chief Financial Officer and City Auditor or their designates be granted
unrestricted access to the books and records of the corporation and subsidiaries
during normal business hours;
(12) the City's consideration upon transfer of the assets to Toronto Hydro consist of 40% equity
and 60% debt to the City;
(13) upon transfer of the assets to the new Toronto Hydro Corporation, the City retain cash
deemed as surplus to the immediate needs of Toronto Hydro and any surplus properties
which may be useful or sellable by the City as listed in Schedule E of the attached Transfer
By-Law;
(14) initially, the financial expectations for Toronto Hydro be stated as follows:
(a) the distribution company maintain a financial structure and risk profile that will
achieve a credit rating of A (low) or higher;
(b) annual capital expenditures in excess of the normal maintenance requirements be
approved by Council;
(c) the distribution company be authorized to set distribution rates in accordance with
the regulations forthcoming from the OEB; and
(d) the quarterly dividend paid to the City be equal to 2/3 of the increase in cash of the
distribution company after allowances have been made for operating and capital
needs, the balance being retained by Toronto Hydro for investment in its competitive
business;
(15) all proceeds of the debt and dividends from Toronto Hydro be used toward the existing City
capital obligations and not be used to increase City operating expenses;
(16) the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee endorse in principle the terms of the
Shareholder Direction and the Transfer By-Law as attached in Appendices 1 and 2 of this
report and that, if necessary, the City Solicitor finalize the form of these documents for
approval by Council; and
(17) the appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Background:
The City of Toronto Act 1997 amalgamated the 6 former Hydro-Electric Commissions into one and
designated the new City of Toronto as the owner of the combined assets, under the management and
control of the new Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission. The Commission is not an agency of the
City and does not rely on the property tax base for funding. All expenses are covered through
consumer electricity rates. The City currently has the right to appoint the Commission, but has no
right to give direction to the Hydro Commission, approve its budget, or receive funding from
company surpluses. The Commission is governed by the Public Utilities Act.
The Energy Competition Act (Bill 35) was introduced by the Provincial Government in June 1998,
was passed by the Ontario Legislature and given Royal Assent on October 30, 1998. The Act
requires that the City incorporate Toronto Hydro under the Ontario Business Corporations Act
(OBCA) within 2 years, ending November 7, 2000. This new entity will be required to pay to the
Province an amount equivalent to corporate income tax.
The legislation also stipulates that the City will be the sole shareholder of the new corporation.
Bill 35 requires that the electricity distribution system be separated from other activities of
municipal electric utilities, such as power generation, electricity retailing, and the rental or sale of
water heaters. The electricity distribution system (wires) will continue to operate as a monopoly
regulated by the Ontario Energy Board (OEB), but the generation and retailing of electricity will
be open to the competitive market. To avoid cross-subsidization of the competitive businesses by
the distribution business, the legislation requires that the municipal utilities establish separate
corporations to manage the regulated and non-regulated businesses.
Council Reference/History:
Over the last year, Toronto Hydro has been preparing for the changes introduced by Bill 35. The
Mayor requested that the City Chief Administrative Officer co-ordinate the efforts of the City and
Toronto Hydro in defining the relationship between the City and Toronto Hydro. A CAO report
dated September 23, 1998, outlined the steps necessary to address this issue.
As a first step, the CAO organized a series of briefings for Councillors to become familiar with the
legislation and the decisions which Council would have to make respecting incorporation of both
Toronto Hydro and TDHC. The material from these briefings was distributed to all Members of
Council.
The CAO also reported on the selection process and the qualifications of the Board for the new
Toronto Hydro Corporation. The issue was referred to the Mayor who recommended that a Steering
Committee be authorized by Council to nominate the new Board of Directors. The CAO engaged
Caldwell Partners to assist the Steering Committee and a new Board of Directors took office on
April 19,1999.
The City CAO organized a joint staff working group comprised of both City and Toronto Hydro staff
to develop the terms of the new relationship between the City and the new Toronto Hydro
Corporation. Financial and legal advisors to both the City and Toronto Hydro were also
participants in this working group. This report is the product of the working group activities and
recommends the structure of the new corporation, the principles recommended to guide in
developing the financial relationship, and the terms of the Shareholder's Direction and the Transfer
By-law required to establish the new corporation and give direction to the new Board.
Related to this issue, but quite separate, are a number of directives regarding the Toronto District
Heating Corporation (TDHC) and its new initiative in district cooling. Bill 35 also permits TDHC
to incorporate as a share capital corporation under the OBCA. TDHC is a partnership among the
City of Toronto, the Province of Ontario, the University of Toronto, and the group of downtown
hospitals. Although traditionally TDHC's business has centred around generation and supply of
district steam heating systems, TDHC has developed a plan to provide district cooling systems as
well through Deep Lake Water Cooling (DLWC). At the same time, Toronto Hydro, in co-operation
with other partners, has been developing plans for a new cooling system using ice plants. Several
Council directives have indicated a need to ensure that these two initiatives, both having a City
interest, are complementary to one another rather than in competition. Before TDHC can be
incorporated, it will be necessary to determine the relative value of shares of the partners and
develop a shareholders' agreement which will govern how the shareholders will conduct business.
The incorporation of TDHC and its relationship with Toronto Hydro will be the subject of a
separate report to be brought forward to Council by the CAO in the near future.
Discussion:
This report provides an overview of the options available to the City in responding to Bill 35,
recommends a course of action for the City, and outlines the terms of the documents required to
implement those actions.
There are a number of decisions which the City has to make in response to Bill 35 and in
establishing the corporate structures as required by the legislation. These include:
(1) Should the City keep the company or sell it - wholly or in part?
(2) Should the City continue to own the monopoly distribution component only or enter into the
competitive market of generation, retailing, and related businesses?
(3) What City objectives will guide the Board of Directors in making business decisions?
(4) What is the corporate structure of the new company and what processes are necessary for
the City to carry out its duties as a shareholder?
(5) What degree of latitude in making business decisions will be afforded the Board and what
controls are required?
(6) What assets are required to establish the new corporation and what financial structure is
necessary to enable it to grow while providing a return to the City?
(7) What financial return does the City expect from this investment?
(8) How should the City apply income from this investment?
This report discusses each of these questions and recommends a course of action.
(1) Sell or Keep:
There are a number of issues in considering whether the City should retain sole ownership of its
electric company or sell all or part of it to another investor.
First, is there a willing buyer? Early on there was considerable interest in the market in investing
in or outright purchasing of electric companies, possibly at prices considerably above book value.
However, interest in selling has been tempered by the introduction of a Provincial transfer tax of
33% of gross assets. The transfer tax will be used to pay down the stranded debt, the residual
remaining from the Ontario Hydro debt that was not transferred to the new Provincial corporations.
The transfer tax is to be applied to the sale of any interest in a municipal electric utility, or of any
property that was used in connection with its business, upon the sale to any party other than another
municipal electricity utility or other public sector entities. By November 7, 2000, these non-taxable
entities will also be subject to this transfer tax. This limits the interest in selling to the private sector
as it adversely impacts the proceeds which the City would realize from such a sale compared to the
future benefits of retaining ownership.
There are still many willing investors who would like to invest in any electric utility, particularly in
Toronto Hydro with its high-density market, because of the stability of the regulated portion of the
business. Revenues are predictable for the monopoly and the customer base is relatively static.
Given that the rates for the distribution business will be regulated by the Ontario Energy Board, the
distribution rates will be less influenced by economic cycles than for other corporate entities.
A partial sale could bring significant new private sector money into the City, but such investments
usually come with some strings attached. Large investors would be entitled to a share of the profits
of the company and would likely demand membership on the Board and possibly other influences.
The implications of partnering with additional shareholders would likely differ depending on the
individual proposed partners and would need to be thoroughly assessed through a formal offering
process before proceeding.
In assessing the sell/keep option, the City must also determine whether it has an on-going interest
in the business beyond financial considerations. The distribution business forms an integral part
of the infrastructure of the City and the City may want to have an influence on the maintenance and
operation of that infrastructure. The City also has an interest in ensuring that the company remains
stable and viable in order to guarantee the reliability of a service which is essential to business and
residents of the City as well as the City's own services.
Finally, the City must consider whether keeping the distribution company is in the financial best
interests of the City. The current book value of Toronto Hydro is $1.7 billion. Toronto Dominion
Securities (TDSI) was engaged by Toronto Hydro to provide an assessment of the current value of
Toronto Hydro. The assessment was also reviewed by the City's financial advisor in this matter,
RBC Dominion Securities (RBCDS), who concurred with the findings. TDSI's findings indicated
that the indicative value range of Toronto Hydro was:
With Gradual Recapitalization $1.4 billion to $2.4 billion
With Immediate Recapitalization $1.6 billion to $2.8 billion
The value on sale of the company depends on the degree and speed with which the corporation
moves to a commercial debt/equity ratio and moves toward a commercial rate of return. The
corporation is worth more the faster it moves to a higher debt level and commercial rate of return.
If the City keeps its investment in Toronto Hydro, it should look for an income stream which matches
the interest which could be earned or avoided through sale of the company in order to justify
retention of the company on purely financial terms.
It is recommended that the City retain ownership of Toronto Hydro for the foreseeable future and
that the City's ownership be reviewed if the financial return is not sustained at a level comparable
to the City's cost of new debt issuance.
(2) Investment in Competitive, Non-regulated Business
Most of the current activities of Toronto Hydro consists of the distribution of electricity and will be,
therefore, a regulated, monopoly business in the restructured electricity market. All other current
or future business activities associated with the electricity business carried on by Toronto Hydro will
fall in the competitive, non-regulated sector. Bill 35 establishes those competitive activities in which
municipal electric utilities may become involved. These activities are:
(i) power generation;
(ii) retailing electricity;
(iii) distributing or retailing gas or other energy products;
(iv) providing meter installation and reading services and billing services;
(v) managing or operating water and sewage services;
(vi) renting or selling hot water heaters; and
(vii) providing services to improve energy efficiency.
In the new competitive electricity market, Toronto consumers will continue to be supplied their
electricity through the wires of the distribution company, but will have a choice as to the party from
whom they will purchase this power.
Consumers may choose to buy power from a retailer who will typically guarantee a price level to
its customers and buy direct from generators in volumes based on their customer demands. This
business can be risky compared to the distribution business since the retailer must match
generators' prices to pricing offered to consumers in what can be a volatile market. The retail
business will also likely be highly competitive. Toronto Hydro's competitive affiliate could be
involved in this kind of activity.
Those customers who choose not to buy from a retailer would be deemed to be "default supply"
customers. These customers would be provided their power through the distribution company or
through its competitive affiliate at the spot price for power in the Province. Default supply
customers would see their prices rise and fall from time to time to reflect movements in the spot
price. They would not receive their power at a guaranteed price level, like customers buying from
a retailer, since no one would be assuming the price risk for them nor would they expect to be paying
any form of premium to avoid price fluctuations.
A key question is whether the City wants to invest in or continue to hold ownership of those portions
of the electricity business that will now compete with the private sector. The considerations include
capital investment required, expected return, level of risk, diversity of the portfolio, responsiveness
to market forces, ability to maintain a business agenda, and competency.
Competitive pricing is generally driven by market forces rather than being based on the cost of the
product, as is the case for the distribution company and most public sector pricing. This in itself
has inherent risks if costs cannot be held in check and reduced when market prices are forced down
by competition. At this point, it is unknown how many companies and which companies will be
players in the electricity market. Observations of other deregulated utility industries would predict
that a flood of new and existing companies will enter the market as early as permitted and
aggressive marketing and pricing strategies will initially create a highly competitive market in
retailing electricity.
However, Toronto Hydro has the advantage of already supplying all of its current 650,000
customers in Toronto. Even so, aggressive marketing and pricing will still be required to retain this
customer base in the new market and it is unlikely that all customers will be retained. It will be
difficult for the corporation to change its mind-set from that of a monopoly, but Toronto Hydro has
already recruited specialist staff in preparation for these changes. In addition, Toronto Hydro could
consider engaging a partner with experience and a similar client base to develop the retail business.
Of all electric utilities in Ontario, Toronto Hydro has the size, resources, customer base, and
credibility to be successful in this new market which is no longer limited to the Toronto area. There
may be synergies between the new initiatives and the distribution company which may give Toronto
Hydro a competitive advantage in providing consumers with a wide range of services.
As a major player in the competitive industry, Toronto Hydro could be influential in ensuring that
energy conservation and environmental responsibility are retained as important issues for
consumers. Council has indicated its strong support for action on environmental issues, particularly
those related to air quality and global climate change. Toronto Hydro is well situated to develop
co-generated electricity with natural gas technologies that emit far fewer pollutants than either
coal-fired or nuclear generating stations, and renewable energies such as wind and solar energy,
which emit no air pollutants. With a planned business approach, Toronto Hydro could become an
environmental leader in this field while remaining a viable business enterprise.
The new Board of Directors selected by Council at its meeting of April 13, 1999, brings the business
perspective necessary to lead the company into the competitive businesses. However, care must be
taken by Council to permit the new Board to operate on a commercially prudent basis if it is to enter
the competitive market. The pursuit of a non-profit agenda could result in a non-viable business.
It is recommended that Council leave open the option for Toronto Hydro to develop and invest in
the non-regulated, competitive businesses permitted by legislation wherever there is a good business
case, risks are reasonable, and returns are satisfactory.
At its meeting of April 13, 14 and 15, 1999, Council requested that the new Board of Directors
submit a strategic business plan to Council in September. The Board of Directors will be expected
to assess the business risks, determine the investment required, forecast the financial returns, and
assess the benefits of investing in the non-regulated businesses. The Board should also articulate
its environmental strategy including its commitment to renewable energy. These are important
strategic investments which may involve risk as yet unknown and may impact the City's ultimate
return on investment. Council should be apprised of the strategy. In future years, the Board of
Directors will be expected to assess project business plans and authorize investments within their
mandate and which the Board deems appropriate to support the high level strategy.
It is recommended that the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro provide for Council's information
an overall business strategy indicating the businesses it intends to develop, the forecasted investment
required, and the financial and environmental benefits to Toronto Hydro, the City and consumers
and the Board of Directors be authorized to assess individual initiatives and commit resources in
accordance with the strategy.
(3) City Objectives
In order to ensure that Toronto Hydro is managed in accordance with the City's objectives, it is
necessary for the City to outline some specific objectives and guiding principles. The following City
objectives were developed in co-operation with the staff working group:
(a) The value of the corporation is maintained or increased;
(b) The City's income stream from Toronto Hydro be comparable to the City's estimated
financial benefit if the asset had been sold;
(c) Consumers are not unduly impacted by the change in structure; and
(d) Environmental impacts be improved.
The strategies outlined in this report and the Shareholder Direction and Transfer By-Law attached
to this report were developed in accordance with these objectives. It is recommended that these
objectives be endorsed by City Council.
(4) Corporate Structure and Duties of Shareholder
Toronto Hydro Corporate Structure
In the past, Toronto Hydro purchased power from Ontario Hydro (the generator) and sold and
delivered this power to the consumer. Under the new legislation, distribution will continue to be a
monopoly business regulated by the OEB, but both generation and retailing will be non-regulated
and competitive. The legislation requires that the regulated business be kept structurally separate
from the non-regulated businesses. This means that the corporate structure must establish different
companies for these components.
A number of structural options are possible:
(a) Separate corporations each owned individually by the City. This is the model that the
Provincial government has implemented.
(b) The regulated business owns each of the non-regulated corporations.
(c) A "holding company" owns and manages the various corporations which deliver regulated
and non-regulated services.
The joint working group determined that option (c) was the most appropriate for Toronto Hydro.
It has the following advantages:
(a) one overall board can manage the transition from the current structure to the required
structure;
(b) the City deals with one entity and establishes overall objectives for the entire portfolio;
(c) one overarching structure can develop centralized services for various companies to keep
overhead and administrative costs down; and
(d) one board can co-ordinate activities which are complementary to maximize returns and
manage strategic investments.
Under this scenario, the Board of Directors which has been selected by Council will become the
holding company board of directors. The Toronto Hydro Corporation (the holding company) will
be wholly owned by the City as the sole shareholder. In turn, the Toronto Hydro Corporation will
own all of the shares of its two subsidiaries. The Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited will be the
subsidiary distribution company which is a monopoly and regulated by the Ontario Energy Board.
The Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. will be the non-regulated subsidiary operating businesses
in the competitive market.
Provincial regulations requires that 1/3 of the members of the board of directors of the distribution
company be independent from directors of competitive subsidiaries. The boards of the subsidiaries
need not be large and could be comprised of at least 3 members of the holding company board.
These members could be selected by the holding company board from among its own members. This
assures Council that the members appointed by Council are indeed managing the business directly.
It should be noted, however, that some strategic investments will require partnerships with other
public and private sector concerns. At present, Toronto Hydro is already in partnership with
Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPGI), Mississauga Hydro and Canadian Utilities in OPGI's
Lakeview generation project and intends to develop other projects in partnership with both OPGI
and the private sector. These individual projects and businesses may require their own boards
comprised of members from all partners. However, Toronto Hydro's share in these joint ventures
would be managed by the board of the competitive subsidiary, Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc.
With time, it is conceivable that several individual corporations will be required to develop distinct
projects or specific services to niche markets. The overall corporate structure could eventually
become quite complex. However, under the holding company model, the City's interests will be
managed by a single Board of Directors appointed by Council.
It is recommended that Council authorize the incorporation of Toronto Hydro-Electric System
Limited as the distribution company, Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. as the competitive
company, and Toronto Hydro Corporation as the holding company, wholly owned by the City of
Toronto, which owns the shares of the aforementioned two corporations and authorize the City
Solicitor to file the Articles of Incorporation.
It is also recommended that the Board of Directors of the Toronto Hydro Corporation, who were
appointed by Council, in turn appoint the members to the boards of directors of the two subsidiaries
from among its own members and in accordance with Provincial regulations.
Shareholder Duties and Processes
The shareholder of any private corporation incorporated under the OBCA has certain rights and
obligations as outlined in the attached Shareholder Direction in Section 5.2. The shareholder must
approve:
(a) amendments to the articles of incorporation or by-laws of the corporation;
(b) plans to amalgamate or incorporate under other jurisdictions;
(c) plans to dissolve the company;
(d) changes to the share structure;
(e) sale of substantially all of the corporations assets;
(f) appointment of the auditor; and
(g) changes to the structure and membership of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the corporation. As such,
the Directors are legally accountable for the performance and actions of the corporation. If the
shareholder (the City) interferes with the decisions of the Board, the City may assume legal liability
for such decisions and cannot hold the Board accountable. Care must be taken to ensure that the
Board retains responsibility for the corporation while ensuring that Council protects its investment.
In addition to the statutory requirements noted above, it is recommended that the following matters
also be approved by City Council as shareholder:
(h) any recommended financial assistance to directors or officers of the corporation or
subsidiaries;
(i) capital investments in the distribution company significantly above those anticipated in the
initial business plan;
(j) expansion of the area of service of the distribution system beyond the City of Toronto; and
(k) investment in other than approved classes of securities and debt instruments.
These are detailed in section 5.3 of the attached Shareholder Direction.
The shareholder must also approve the by-laws which govern the operation of the corporation and
the board of directors. These should be developed in conjunction with the new Board of Directors
and submitted to Council for approval at the earliest opportunity. Given the specific concerns
expressed in the past regarding expenses of board members, it may be prudent for the City to request
that the by-laws include a policy on reimbursement of board members' expenses. It is recommended
that the Board of Directors develop corporate by-laws for approval by Council and include
specifically a policy requiring submission of receipts for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses
for board members.
One of the initial duties of the shareholder is to appoint the auditor of the corporation. Ernst &
Young are currently the auditors for the Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission and for the City. To
maintain continuity for the first year of operation, it is recommended that Council appoint Ernst &
Young, Chartered Accountants as the first auditor of the Toronto Hydro Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
It is the norm for a corporation to hold an annual shareholders' meeting where required decisions
are made and the financial reports are received. City of Toronto Council represents the
shareholder, but the shareholder in this case is considered one entity and any votes cast by the
shareholder are really one vote. A shareholder meeting can be any meeting of Council. In order
for City Council to carry out the shareholder's obligations, the following process is envisioned at
this time:
- The Board of Directors puts the questions to the City
- City staff recommend decisions for Council approval
- Council debates the issues and makes a decision
- A City proxy (the City Clerk) conveys the decisions of the shareholder to the Board of
Directors
It is recommended that the City Clerk be named the voting proxy for the City as shareholder to
convey to the Board of Directors any decisions made by Council respecting the Toronto Hydro
Corporation.
(5) Board Latitude and Controls
Beyond the approvals required of the shareholder as stated above, the Board of Directors would be
given full authority to make individual business decisions and further develop the corporate
structure and financing required to implement its business plans. At all times, the Board will be
expected to act in accordance with a Shareholder Direction which will be approved by Council.
However, Council must be assured on an on-going basis that the business is performing according
to direction and in the best interests of the City and the corporation's other stakeholders. It is
recommended that the following control mechanisms be implemented in addition to any regulatory
requirements of the Ontario Energy Board and the right of Council to replace any or all members
of the Board of Directors at any time:
(a) an annual business plan be reviewed by the City Chief Financial Officer to ensure
consistency with the City's overall financial and strategic expectations as outlined in the
Shareholder's Direction from time to time and the CFO report any irregularities to Council
with a recommendation for appropriate action;
(b) quarterly reports be submitted to the City CFO and annual consolidated financial statements
be submitted by the Board of Directors to Council; and
(c) the City Chief Financial Officer and City Auditor or their designates be granted unrestricted
access to the books and records of the corporation and subsidiaries during normal business
hours.
(6) Asset Transfer and Financial Structure
The new Toronto Hydro Corporation will be a private corporation owned by the City of Toronto and
not an agency of the City. As such, it is a business investment whose shares can be sold or used to
earn a profit for the investor. A Transfer By-Law is necessary to transfer the Toronto Hydro assets
and liabilities from the City to the new corporation. In exchange for these assets, the City will
receive consideration in whatever form it chooses, which may include cash, shares, and debt to the
City.
The corporation will be required to pay amounts equivalent to corporate income taxes to the
Provincial Government, as does any other private corporation. Although consumer rates and cost
of power will be driven by market forces on pricing, the rates applicable to distribution of electricity
to all consumers by the monopoly will be subject to regulation by the OEB. Although regulations
concerning the distribution rates are not yet available, it is anticipated that the OEB will permit the
distribution rates to cover operating costs, interest on a commercial debt/equity ratio, and a
commercially acceptable profit margin. The rationale is that even the regulated monopoly is a
business enterprise that should operate as a commercial business and remain attractive to
commercial investors. Evidence of this direction can be found in the proposed rates for the
Province's own distribution company, Ontario Hydro Services Company, which includes an
operational 60/40 debt/equity ratio and a return on equity of 9.35%.
The City should expect an income from Toronto Hydro because it is a business investment rather
than an agency and:
(i) a reasonable return history will maintain the value of the corporation in case the City wishes
to take in future investment partners or sell part or all of its shares at some future point. The
corporation must remain an attractive business investment;
(ii) the City could have sold the company and invested the proceeds or reduced its own debt and
therefore should not forego returns which would have otherwise been available; and
(iii) the requirement of a return will encourage the corporation to be as efficient as possible to
meet the City expectations as well as invest in growing the businesses.
Every taxable corporation strives to minimize its tax liability. Capital cost allowance (depreciation)
and debt interest are both deductions from net income for tax purposes. These deductions should
be maximized in order to minimize taxes payable. Capital cost allowance is a function of the level
of capital assets owned and represents the deemed usage of those assets on an annual basis. It is
not actually an outflow of cash. However, the actual capital investments may be an outflow of cash,
but are not deductible for tax purposes.
In order to minimize income taxes and maximize return to the City while providing Toronto Hydro
sufficient cash to cover capital investments required, it is proposed that the City divide its investment
in Toronto Hydro between debt and equity. No actual cash passes between the City and Toronto
Hydro regarding the debt; the value of the equity is reduced accordingly.
The following hypothetical example illustrates the benefits of this split between debt and equity in
two corporations with precisely the same operations and capital investment:
With Debt to
Without Debt Shareholder
Equity $1,000,000,000 $400,000,000
Debt to Shareholder 600,000,000
Operating Income $130,000,000 $130,000,000
Depreciation (50,000,000) (50,000,000)
Interest Expense (30,000,000)
Net Income Before Tax 80,000,000 50,000,000
Tax at 40% (32,000,000) (20,000,000)
Net Income After Tax 48,000,000 30,000,000
Return on Equity 4.8% 7.5%
Province gets 32,000,000 20,000,000
Shareholder gets (interest + 50% divid.) 24,000,000 45,000,000
Corporation retains:
Contribution to Retained Earnings 24,000,000 15,000,000
Cash from depreciation 50,000,000 50,000,000
The advantages of dividing the investment in Toronto Hydro into debt to the City and equity shares
are:
(1) The city is guaranteed an income stream regardless of the performance of the corporation
and beyond the discretion of the Board of Directors.
(2) Debt can be sold to the market at any time to realize new money to the City if the need arises
without diluting the City's ownership interest in Toronto Hydro.
(3) Debt interest payable to the City reduces the corporate income taxes payable to the Province
in favour of before-tax payments to the City. Debt payments to the City, therefore, may be
more lucrative to the City than after-tax dividends.
(4) The value of the corporation is improved through a reasonable and commercially acceptable
debt/equity ratio because it generates a higher rate of return on equity.
(5) The average cost of capital is lower with debt than without. Without debt, greater revenues
would be required to sustain the same level of capital investment.
The financial advisors to the City and Toronto Hydro have indicated that a debt level of 60% of the
value of the corporation is reasonable for the type of business and its risk profile and is an
acceptable level to maintain a good credit rating. It is recommended that the City's consideration
upon transfer of the assets to Toronto Hydro consist of 40% equity and 60% debt to the City.
The City is required to transfer to Toronto Hydro all of the assets used in the generation,
distribution, or sale of electricity, including peripheral services. At present, Toronto Hydro has a
cash surplus and surplus properties. Much of this surplus was generated as a result of
amalgamating the six former municipal utilities. Surpluses could be retained by the City without
impairing the corporation's ability to carry on business. It is recommended that the City retain cash
deemed as surplus to the immediate needs of Toronto Hydro and any surplus properties which may
be useful or sellable by the City. The list of surplus assets to be retained by the City is included as
Schedule E in the attached Transfer By-Law.
Toronto Hydro currently has an outstanding long term debt of approximately $80 million which the
City has debentured on behalf of Toronto Hydro. Under the legislation, the City is not permitted
to transfer any outstanding City debentures to Toronto Hydro. This debt will be included in the
overall new debt as part of the consideration for the transfer of assets. These liabilities are listed
in Schedule F in the attached Transfer By-Law.
(7) Financial Expectations
For any investment, the investor desires the maximum return on investment. It is generally held that
the level of return is commensurate with the level of risk to be assumed. If higher rates of return are
required, some degree of risk is expected. However, the City manages its investments on behalf of
the City of Toronto ratepayers and is expected to be conservative in its use of funds and the risks that
it assumes.
To control the level of debt and risk in investments, the new Toronto Hydro's distribution company
should be expected to maintain a credit rating of A (low) or better. This constraint will ensure the
corporation's continued conservatism and low-risk profile.
In addition, the City should encourage Toronto Hydro to continue its capital maintenance program
to ensure that the distribution assets maintain their value and ensure the reliability of the
distribution service. The corporation should be permitted to invest in these assets without
shareholder approval up to a reasonable ceiling.
For the competitive businesses, the Board of Directors will be expected to conduct business
according to the strategic business plan. Any significant deviations from the initial plan should be
forwarded to Council for information.
Rates
Under the new market design, the consumer rate will be composed of several different charges by
several different companies. A redistribution of the charges is expected to occur over the next few
years as competitive forces work on the charges by generators and retailers and the distribution
companies are recapitalized. The Provincial government is also adding a surcharge direct to
consumers to be used to repay the stranded debt. Beginning in 2001, Toronto Hydro will be subject
to payments in lieu of corporate income taxes. This added expense will require an upward
adjustment to the distribution charge.
The income level of the distribution company is directly related to the distribution rates to be
charged. The higher the rate, the higher the income level. However, the distribution rate will be
capped by regulation of the OEB. This will protect consumers from unduly rising distribution rates.
The distribution rates comprise only about 15% of the total consumer charges. If all other
components of the consumer rate remained the same, an increase of 10% in the distribution charge
would equate to only 1.5% increase in consumer rates which is less than $1 on an average monthly
homeowner bill.
At the same time, the cost of power from the generators, which comprises a much more significant
percentage of the consumer rate, is expected to decline for Toronto consumers due to competitive
influences. Therefore, any increases in distribution rates are expected to be offset by declines in the
cost of power from generators.
Rates for the competitive retail business will be regulated by the market. Free competition usually
forces rates down.
It should be noted that all of the above influences will occur in 2001. For 2000, the consumer rate
structure will be set as in the past except that the OEB will approve the rate rather than Ontario
Hydro.
Dividend Policy
The Board of Directors of any company has the authority to determine the amount of dividends it
will pay to its shareholders. The City as sole shareholder, however, can outline its expectations for
dividend disbursements.
There are a number of ways in which a dividend policy can be expressed. It is common practice to
express a dividend in terms of a percentage of the net income. The percentage may vary depending
on the capital needs of the business. For instance, a company requiring substantive cash for capital
investment may provide a low dividend payout, whereas a company with lower capital needs may
establish a dividend policy using higher percentages. Generally, some of the net income is retained
within the company as retained earnings.
Because some items on the income statement are not cash items (depreciation), net income does not
represent clearly the cash available or required for working capital. Another approach to defining
the dividend policy is to determine annually what cash is available, what is needed for maintenance,
working capital and strategic investments, and distribute the balance or a high percentage of the
residual cash to the shareholder.
It would also be appropriate to set a separate dividend policy for each of the businesses. However,
since the competitive businesses are not currently in operation, investment is required in the early
years to develop these businesses. No significant dividend is expected from the competitive
businesses in the first few years.
Dividends of the distribution company are payable to its shareholder, the Toronto Hydro
Corporation. The Toronto Hydro Corporation will immediately pay 2/3 of this dividend to the City
as its shareholder and will retain the balance. This retained portion will initially be used to fund
the development of the competitive subsidiary.
It is recommended that initially, the financial expectations be stated as follows:
(a) the distribution company maintain a financial structure and risk profile that will achieve a
credit rating of A (low) or higher;
(b) annual capital expenditures for the distribution company which are significantly in excess
of the normal maintenance requirements be approved by Council;
(c) the distribution company be authorized to set distribution rates in accordance with the
regulations forthcoming from the OEB; and
(d) the quarterly dividend paid to the City be equal to 2/3 of the increase in cash of the
distribution company after allowances have been made for operating and capital needs, the
balance being retained by Toronto Hydro for investment in its competitive business.
(8) Disposition of City Proceeds from Toronto Hydro
Under the proposed financial arrangement, the City should expect to receive a significant amount
of Toronto Hydro's surplus cash in 1999 and interest and dividends in 2000 and later. A planned
approach to the disposition of these proceeds needs to be determined.
The Debt Proceeds:
The municipal credit rating agencies are watching carefully how the City makes use of its investment
in Toronto Hydro. The City's credit rating has been under pressure, having been recently put on
notice of review of its AAA rating by the Canadian Bond Rating Service. A reduction in the credit
rating can make it more expensive to issue future debt.
Forecasts of debt and debt service costs indicate a rapid rise over the next ten years unless
mitigating actions are identified. By applying the debt proceeds (i.e. interest payments) received
from Toronto Hydro against City debt service costs, it helps to ameliorate the situation.
Some aspects of the recapitalization will be dependent on the future actions of the OEB. In addition,
the terms of the debt to the City have not yet been determined. The debt could be perpetual debt
where the balance remains stable and only interest payments are made. Perpetual debt guarantees
a long-term interest payment stream, but does not provide any principal repayment. Alternatively,
debt principal could be repaid through a normal amortization of principal. This approach increases
the annual obligation of Toronto Hydro to the City, but will end at some point when the debt is
repaid.
If debt principal is to be repaid or if the City converts the Toronto Hydro debt to market debt, then
principal repayment or proceeds from monetization should be directly applied to City debt. In this
way, overall debt on a consolidated basis remains the same. Through responsible application of the
proceeds to offset or reduce the City's debt obligations, the credit rating is supported. Proceeds
from principal repayment should not be used to finance increased capital expenditures, nor should
debt principal repayments be allocated to fund program expenditures in the City's operating budget
because the City should not come to rely on a temporary source of funds for these purposes.
The Dividends:
Dividends also form part of the income stream resulting from capital investment. If Toronto Hydro
had been sold, the proceeds would likely have gone to repay the City debt or to finance capital.
Dividends therefore, should also be applied to reduce the City's capital obligations. Dividends are
not guaranteed and tend to fluctuate in amount, depending on the profitability of Toronto Hydro.
Until the dividend becomes a predictable source of income, it should also be applied to the City's
debt reduction through the capital current contribution vehicle. Once there is a predictable dividend
income stream, capital from current increases could be reliably funded, reducing operating budget
pressures.
It is recommended that the proceeds of the debt and dividends from Toronto Hydro be used toward
the existing City capital obligations and not be used to increase City operating expenses.
(9) Next Steps:
It is proposed that the new companies be incorporated immediately and the transfer of assets take
place on July 1, 1999. This will permit the companies sufficient time to organize and prepare their
operations for the opening of the competitive market in 2001, In addition, it sets in place the
necessary structures which enable the City to begin receiving dividends and interest payments from
Toronto Hydro in 2000. For administrative simplicity, however, staff will be transferred as of
January 1, 2000.
The attached Transfer By-Law reflects asset values as at December 31, 1998, the date of the most
recent audited financial statements. Actual values as of July 1, 1999 will not be known until several
weeks after the quarter-ending when all necessary adjustments have been processed. It is proposed
and allowed for in the Transfer By-Law that the City CFO in consultation with Toronto Hydro's
CFO adjust the values in the schedules attached to the By-law to reflect the values as at July 1,
1999 when the information comes available.
The legislation requires that the value of assets transferred be at fair market value. The
determination of fair market value may be impacted by Provincial regulations which are not yet
available. For purposes of this transfer, the fair market value has been deemed to be book value.
When the regulations come available, a further adjustment may be necessary. The terms of the
attached Transfer By-Law authorize the City CFO to make this adjustment.
There is one technical legal issue still being discussed with Provincial officials as at the date of this
report. Since the City of Toronto is the first municipality to proceed with the incorporation and
transfer of assets, it is not yet clear what sequence of transfers is most acceptable in order to effect
the transfer of assets to the subsidiaries through the holding company. This issue will be resolved
in time for a technical amendment to the By-Law prior to Council's consideration of this matter.
It is recommended that the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee endorse in principle the
terms of the Shareholder Direction and Transfer By-Law as attached in Appendices 1 and 2 of this
report and that, if necessary, the City Solicitor finalize the form of these documents for approval by
Council.
--------
Incorporation of Toronto Hydro Corporation - Appendix 1
CITY OF TORONTO
SHAREHOLDER DIRECTION
RELATING TO
TORONTO HYDRO CORPORATION
July 1, 1999
Prepared by:
Smith Lyons
Suite 5800, Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Toronto M5H 3Z7
--------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Article 1 Interpretation
1.1 Definitions
1.2 Calculation of Time
1.3 Regulatory Matters
Article 2 Objectives And Principles
2.1 Purposes
2.2 Shareholder Objectives
2.3 Principles
Article 3 Business Of Toronto Hydro
3.1 Business of Toronto Hydro
3.2 Business of the Distribution Company
Article 4 Operation And Control
4.1 Board of Directors and Responsibilities6
4.2 Board of Directors of Subsidiaries
4.3 Qualifications of Directors
4.4 Vacancies
4.5 Term
4.6 Conflict of Interest Policy
4.7 Confidentiality
4.8 Remuneration
Article 5 Shareholder Matters
5.1 Decisions of the Shareholder
5.2 Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval under the OBCA
5.3 Other Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval
Article 6 Reporting
6.1 Business Plan
6.2 Quarterly Reports
6.3 Access to Records
6.4 Audit
6.5 Accounting
6.6 Annual Financial Statements
Article 7 Financial Performance
7.1 Financial Performance
7.2 Credit Rating
7.3 Debt Financing
7.4 Dividend Policy
7.5 Operation Policy
7.6 Amendments
--------
SHAREHOLDER DIRECTION
WHEREAS Toronto Hydro Corporation (the "Corporation") is a corporation existing under the
Business Corporations Act (Ontario);
AND WHEREAS the City of Toronto (the "Shareholder") is the beneficial owner of all of the issued
shares of the Corporation;
AND WHEREAS the Corporation and the Subsidiaries (together, "Toronto Hydro") are the
successors to the business of Toronto Hydro Electric Commission;
AND WHEREAS Toronto Hydro's business (the "Business") is integral to the well-being and
infrastructure of the City of Toronto;
AND WHEREAS the Business is subject to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 1998 and the Ontario
Energy Board Act, 1998 being Schedules A and B, respectively, to the Energy Competition Act,
1998, S.O. c.15, as such statutes may be amended or re-enacted from time to time;
AND WHEREAS the Shareholder wishes to establish certain principles of governance relating to
Toronto Hydro;
NOW THEREFORE THIS DIRECTION WITNESSES:
ARTICLE 1
INTERPRETATION
1.1 Definitions
In this Direction, in addition to the terms defined in the recitals, the following terms will have the
meanings set out below:
"Associate" means a person that is associated with the Corporation or any Subsidiary as such
relationship is defined in the OBCA;
"Board" means the board of directors of the Corporation;
"body corporate" means a firm, partnership, unincorporated association, joint venture, body
corporate, corporation, bank, trust, pension fund, union, governmental agency, board, tribunal,
ministry or commission or other legal entity of any kind whatsoever, but excludes an individual or
natural person;
"Business Plan" means a five year business plan and budget for the Corporation and the
Subsidiaries prepared and approved in accordance with Section 6.1;
"Chair" means the director of the Corporation appointed as Chair of the Board by the Board upon
the nomination by the Shareholder from time to time;
"Distribution Company" means any one or more Subsidiaries that carries on the business described
in Section 3.2 and that owns any distribution system, structures, equipment or property used for that
purpose;
"Distribution Company Cash Flow" means the increase (decrease) in cash of the Distribution
Company, including cash provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and
financing activities but before deducting the Distribution Company Dividend, as calculated and
presented in the Corporation's unconsolidated audited annual Financial Statements;
"Distribution Company Dividend" has the meaning given to it in Section 7.4;
"Financial Statements" means, for any particular period, audited or unaudited (as stipulated in this
Direction), consolidated or unconsolidated (as stipulated in this Direction), comparative financial
statements of the Corporation consisting of not less than a balance sheet, a statement of income and
retained earnings, a statement of changes in financial position, a report or opinion of the Auditor
(in the case of audited Financial Statements) and such other statements, reports, notes and
information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (consistently
applied) and as are required in accordance with any applicable law;
"Lien" means any mortgage, hypothec, assignment, encumbrance, lien or security interest,
regardless of form, that secures the payment of any indebtedness or liability or the observance or
performance of any obligation;
"OBCA" means the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), as such statute may be amended or
re-enacted from time to time;
"person" means an individual, a natural person or a body corporate;
"Regulator" means the Ontario Energy Board, the Independent Electricity Market Operator and
each other governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction over Toronto Hydro;
"Subsidiary" means, with respect to the Corporation, any body corporate of which more than 50%
of the outstanding securities of any class carrying exercisable voting rights are beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, by the Corporation, and includes any body corporate in like relation to a
Subsidiary;
"third party" means a person who deals at arm's length (as interpreted by subsection 251(1) of the
Income Tax Act (Canada)) with the Corporation or the Subsidiaries.
1.2 Calculation of Time
In this Direction, a period of days will be deemed to begin on the first day after the event which
began the period and to end at 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the last day of the period. If, however,
the last day of the period does not fall on a business day, the period will terminate at 5:00 p.m.
(Toronto time) on the next business day.
1.3 Regulatory Matters
In the event of any conflict between any approval or direction or other requirement of the
Shareholder under this Direction and any decision, order or policy of any Regulator, the decision,
order or policy of the Regulator shall govern and Toronto Hydro will at all times comply with any
decision, order or policy of the Regulator whether or not an approval or direction has first been
given in respect thereof by the Shareholder under this Direction. For greater certainty, Toronto
Hydro will not seek any order from any Regulator for any matter that would require the approval
of the Shareholder under this Direction without first giving notice of its intention to seek such an
order to the Shareholder.
ARTICLE 2
OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES
2.1 Purposes
The purposes of this Direction are as follows:
(a) subject to the Board's authority to manage or supervise the management of the
business and affairs of the Corporation, to provide the Board with the Shareholder's
fundamental principles regarding the Business;
(b) to inform the residents of the City of Toronto of the Shareholder's fundamental
principles regarding the Business; and
(c) to set out the accountability, responsibility and relationship between the Board and
the Shareholder.
2.2 Shareholder Objectives
The Shareholder's objectives in connection with its relationship with Toronto Hydro are as
follows:
(a) the value of Toronto Hydro be maintained or increased;
(b) the Shareholder's income stream from Toronto Hydro be comparable to the
Shareholder's estimated financial benefit if Toronto Hydro had been sold as a going
concern;
(c) Toronto Hydro's consumers not be unduly impacted by the succession by Toronto
Hydro of Toronto Hydro Electric Commission; and
(d) environmental impacts related to Toronto Hydro be improved.
2.3 Principles
The following principles will govern the operations of Toronto Hydro:
(a) The Business is integral to the well-being and the infrastructure of the City of
Toronto. The Corporation recognizes that it is in the best interests of Toronto Hydro
and the community of stakeholders whom the Business affects that Toronto Hydro
conduct its affairs:
(i) on a commercially prudent basis;
(ii) in a manner consistent with the energy policies established by the
Shareholder from time to time;
(iii) in accordance with the financial performance objectives of the Shareholder
as set out herein.
(b) Toronto Hydro will provide, through the Distribution Company, a reliable, effective
and efficient electricity distribution system.
(c) Distribution rates applicable to customers of the Distribution Company will be set
by the Board in accordance with the rates fixed by the Ontario Energy Board from
time to time.
(d) The Business is at all times subject to such licences, codes, policies, rules, orders,
interim orders, approvals, consents and other actions of any Regulator.
(e) Toronto Hydro will provide its services with an emphasis on customer orientation
and satisfaction.
(f) Toronto Hydro will operate in a safe and environmentally-responsible manner.
(g) Toronto Hydro will promote energy conservation and environmental responsibility.
(h) The Board is responsible for determining and implementing the appropriate balance
among the foregoing principles and for causing Toronto Hydro to conduct its affairs
in accordance with the same.
ARTICLE 3
BUSINESS OF TORONTO HYDRO
3.1 Business of Toronto Hydro
Subject to the ongoing ability of Toronto Hydro to meet the financial objectives of the
Shareholder set out in this Direction and the ability of the Board to demonstrate the same,
Toronto Hydro, except for the Distribution Company, may engage in any of the following
business activities permitted by the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998:
(a) selling (i) through the Corporation, (ii) through a third party, (iii) through a
Subsidiary, or (iv) through a combination of the foregoing, electricity to every person
connected to the distribution system of the Distribution Company;
(b) owning, operating or having an ownership interest in an electricity generation
facility;
(c) retailing electricity;
(d) distributing or retailing gas or any other energy product which is carried through
pipes or wires to the user;
(e) business activities that develop or enhance the ability of Toronto Hydro to carry on
any of the activities contemplated by subsections 3.1 (c) or (d) or subsection 3.2 (b);
(f) business activities, the principal purpose of which is to use more effectively the assets
of the distribution system of the Distribution Company, including, without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, meter installation and reading services, and billing
services;
(g) managing or operating a public utility or sewage services;
(h) renting or selling hot water heaters;
(i) providing services relating to improving energy efficiency; and
(j) using the real property that Toronto Hydro has the right to use for the purpose of
providing telecommunications services, or entering into agreements with any third
party, including Subsidiaries, authorizing such third party or Subsidiaries to use
such real property for the purpose of providing telecommunications services.
3.2 Business of the Distribution Company
The Distribution Company may engage only in the following business activities:
(a) selling (i) directly, (ii) through a third party, (iii) through a Subsidiary, or (iv)
through a combination of the foregoing, electricity to every person connected to the
distribution system of the Distribution Company;
(b) transmitting or distributing electricity;
(c) business activities, the principal purpose of which is to use more effectively the assets
of the distribution system of the Distribution Company, including, without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, meter installation and reading services, and billing
services;
(d) using the real property that the Distribution Company has the right to use for the
purpose of providing telecommunications services, or entering into agreements with
any third party, including Subsidiaries, authorizing such third party or Subsidiaries
to use such real property for the purpose of providing telecommunications services.
ARTICLE 4
OPERATION AND CONTROL
4.1 Board of Directors and Responsibilities
Subject to any matters requiring approval of the Shareholder pursuant to this Direction, the
Board will supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation,
including the following specific matters:
(a) establishing appropriate reserves consistent with sound financial principles and the
financial performance objectives set out herein;
(b) approving any dividend payment or distribution of capital in excess of the payments
provided for in Section 7.4;
(c) selecting bankers and other financial institutions and establishing all banking
authorities; and
(d) appointing the officers of the Corporation and nominating the individuals to be
appointed senior officers of the Subsidiaries.
4.2 Board of Directors of Subsidiaries
Subject to any matters requiring approval of the Shareholder pursuant to this Direction, the
business and affairs of the Subsidiaries will be managed or supervised by their respective
boards of directors. The Corporation will elect the directors of the Subsidiaries from among
the directors of the Corporation.
4.3 Qualifications of Directors
A majority of the Board and the board of directors of each Subsidiary will be residents of
Canada. In electing directors to the Board the Shareholder will give due regard to the
qualifications of candidates, including:
(a) experience or knowledge with respect to:
(i) public utility commissions or boards of major corporations or other
commercial enterprises;
(ii) corporate finance;
(iii) corporate governance;
(iv) market development;
(v) large system operation and management;
(vi) urban energy industries;
(vii) public policy issues and laws relating to Toronto Hydro and the electricity
industry; and
(viii) environmental matters, labour relations and occupational health and safety
issues;
(b) commercial sensitivity and acumen,
(c) independence of judgment, and
(d) personal integrity.
4.4 Vacancies
If a member of the Board ceases to be a director for any reason, the Shareholder will fill the
vacancy created thereby as soon as reasonably possible. If a member of the board of
directors of any Subsidiary ceases to be a director for any reason, the Corporation will
cause the vacancy to be filled by another director of the Corporation as soon as reasonably
possible.
4.5 Term
The term of office for a director who is not a member of the City of Toronto Council will be
three years or until his or her successor is elected. The term of office for a director who is
a member of the City of Toronto Council will be eighteen months or until his or her
successor is elected. The term of the first directors of the Corporation who are members of
the City of Toronto Council will be deemed to begin on the later of (i) June 14, 1999 and (ii)
the date of incorporation of the Corporation, and to end on November 30, 2000. For greater
certainty, any director may stand for re-election to the Board at the expiry of his or her term.
4.6 Conflict of Interest Policy
The directors and officers of the Corporation and the Subsidiaries will strictly abide by the
requirements of the OBCA and the Corporation in respect of conflicts of interest, including
any requirements in respect of disclosure and abstention from voting.
4.7 Confidentiality
The Shareholder and the directors and officers of the Corporation and the Subsidiaries
(each a "Receiving Party") will ensure that no confidential information of the Shareholder
or Toronto Hydro is disclosed or otherwise made available to any person, except to the
extent that:
(a) disclosure to a Receiving Party's employees or agents is necessary for the
performance of any Receiving Party's duties and obligations under this Direction;
(b) disclosure is required in the course of judicial proceedings or pursuant to law; or
(c) the confidential information becomes part of the public domain (other than through
unauthorized disclosure by the Receiving Party).
4.8 Remuneration
The remuneration of the members of the Board for their respective services as directors will
be as determined by the Shareholder from time to time. Initially, each director of the
Corporation will be paid $12,500 per annum for his or her services, plus $1,000 for each
meeting of the Board attended. Notwithstanding the foregoing:
(a) directors of the Corporation who are members of the City of Toronto Council will
receive no remuneration; and
(b) the Chair will be paid a total of $75,000 per annum.
ARTICLE 5
SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
5.1 Decisions of the Shareholder
The following will apply to any approvals or decisions that the Shareholder must provide:
(a) all approvals and decisions will be made in writing signed by the authorized
signatory of the Shareholder; and
(b) no approval will be given unless the Corporation has given reasonable advance
notice in writing of the need for approval and has provided such information as is
reasonably necessary for the Shareholder to make an informed decision regarding
the subject matter requiring approval.
5.2 Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval under the OBCA
In accordance with the provisions of the OBCA, neither the Corporation nor any Subsidiary
will, without the approval of the Shareholder:
(a) amend its articles or make, amend or repeal any by-law;
(b) amalgamate (except for an amalgamation with one or more Subsidiaries), apply to
continue as a body corporate under the laws of another jurisdiction, merge,
consolidate or reorganize, or approve or effect any plan of arrangement, in each
case whether statutory or otherwise;
(c) take or institute proceedings for any winding up, arrangement, reorganization or
dissolution;
(d) create new classes of shares or reorganize, consolidate, subdivide or otherwise
change its outstanding securities;
(e) sell or otherwise dispose of, by conveyance, transfer, lease, sale and leaseback, or
other transaction, all or substantially all of its assets or undertaking;
(f) change the Auditor;
(g) make any change to the number of directors comprising the Board;
(h) enter into any transaction or take any action that requires shareholder approval
pursuant to the OBCA.
5.3 Other Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval
Without the approval of the Shareholder the Distribution Company will not:
(a) provide any financial assistance, whether by loan, guarantee or otherwise, to any
person;
(b) create, incur or assume any unsecured indebtedness that, by its terms or by any other
agreement, ranks higher than any indebtedness of the Distribution Company held by
the Shareholder while the promissory note of the Corporation or the Distribution
Company issued pursuant to clause 4-1(B)(b)(ii) of By-law No. [x-1999] (the
"Promissory Note") is held by the Shareholder;
(c) create any Lien on its assets while the Promissory Note is held by the Shareholder,
other than:
(i) any Lien in favour of the Shareholder;
(ii) Liens securing purchase money obligations, trade debts or other liabilities
incurred in the ordinary course of business (other than in relation to the
borrowing of money) if the aggregate principal amount of such obligations
does not exceed $10,000,000 at any time;
(iii) Liens securing credit facilities created or incurred for the purpose of
providing operating financing for day-to-day working capital requirements
of the Distribution Company if the aggregate principal amount of such credit
facilities does not exceed $100,000,000 at any time;
(iv) Liens held by any governmental authority that have not at the time been filed
or registered against the title to the Distribution Company's assets or served
upon the Distribution Company pursuant to law or that relate to obligations
of the Distribution Company that are not due or delinquent;
and without the approval of the Shareholder, neither the Corporation nor any Subsidiary
will:
(d) provide any financial assistance, whether by loan, guarantee or otherwise, to any
director or officer of the Corporation or of any Subsidiary or Associate;
(e) make any capital expenditures in an amount exceeding in aggregate $170,000,000
in any fiscal year in connection with the distribution system of the Distribution
Company or any person;
(f) acquire any interest in the distribution system, undertaking or securities of a
distributor (as defined in the Electricity Act, 1998) operating outside of the municipal
boundaries of the City of Toronto;
(g) invest funds in publicly-traded securities other than government debt, Canadian
chartered bank or Canadian corporate securities rated less than A/R-1 (low) (or its
equivalent) by CBRS Inc. or Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited;
(h) enter into any agreement, commitment or investment that provides recourse to the
assets of the Corporation or the Distribution Company or creates any encumbrance,
lien, security interest or recourse in favour of any third party in such assets.
For greater certainty, in this Section 5.3, the term "financial assistance" does not include
remuneration paid in the normal course of business to directors, officers or employees,
including honoraria, wages, salaries or bonuses, or any reimbursement for expenses arising
from such persons' duties.
ARTICLE 6
REPORTING
6.1 Business Plan
Not later than 60 days prior to the end of each fiscal year, the Board will approve and
submit to the Finance Department of the Shareholder (the "Finance Department") a business
plan for the next five fiscal years (the "Business Plan"). The Business Plan will be prepared
on a consistent basis with the Business Plan then in effect. The Corporation will carry on
its business and operations in accordance with the Business Plan which will include, in
respect of the period covered by such plan:
(a) the strategic direction and any new business initiatives which Toronto Hydro will
undertake;
(b) an operating and capital expenditure budget for the next fiscal year and an operating
and capital expenditure projection for each fiscal year thereafter, including the
resources necessary to implement the draft business plan;
(c) the projected annual revenues and profits for each fiscal year for the Corporation
and each of the Subsidiaries;
(d) pro forma consolidated and unconsolidated financial statements, including projected
dividend payments to the Shareholder;
(e) an acquisition budget setting forth the nature and type of capital expenditures
proposed to be made in the following fiscal year, supported by explanations, notes
and information upon which the budget was based;
(f) energy conservation programmes and environmental plans, including the level of
commitment to renewable energy and co-generation;
(g) any material variances in the projected ability of any business activity to meet or
continue to meet the financial objectives of the Shareholder; and
(h) any material variances from the Business Plan then in effect.
6.2 Quarterly Reports
Within 45 days after the end of each fiscal quarter, the Board will prepare (on a consistent
basis with the previous fiscal quarter) and submit to the Finance Department a quarterly
report. The quarterly report will include, in respect of the immediately preceding fiscal
quarter:
(a) quarterly unaudited consolidated and unconsolidated Financial Statements;
(b) such explanations, notes and information as is required to explain and account for
any variances between the actual results from operations and the budgeted amounts
set forth in the current Business Plan, including any material variances in the
projected ability of any business activity to meet or continue to meet the financial
objectives of the Shareholder;
(c) information that is likely to materially affect the Shareholder's financial objectives
or energy policies;
(d) information that is likely to materially affect customers' perceptions or opinions
regarding Toronto Hydro;
(e) information regarding any matter, occurrence or other event which is a material
breach or violation of any law; and
(f) any such additional information as the Shareholder may specify from time to time.
6.3 Access to Records
The duly appointed representatives of the Shareholder (as approved by report to the Council
of the City of Toronto from time to time) shall have unrestricted access to the books and
records of the Corporation and the Subsidiaries during normal business hours. Such
representatives shall treat all information of Toronto Hydro with the same level of care and
confidentiality as any confidential information of the Shareholder.
6.4 Audit
The Corporation's consolidated and unconsolidated Financial Statements will be audited
annually. The first auditor of the Corporation is Ernst & Young, Chartered Accountants,
(the "Auditor").
6.5 Accounting
The Corporation will, in consultation with the Auditor, adopt and use the accounting policies
and procedures which may be approved by the Board from time to time and all such policies
and procedures will be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
applicable regulatory requirements.
6.6 Annual Financial Statements
The Board will cause the Auditor to deliver, as soon as practicable and in any event within
90 days after the end of each fiscal year, the audited consolidated Financial Statements of
the Corporation for consideration by the Shareholder.
ARTICLE 7
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
7.1 Financial Performance
The Board will be responsible for ensuring that Toronto Hydro meets the financial
performance standards set out in this Article 7.
7.2 Credit Rating
The Distribution Company shall maintain a financial structure that will achieve a rating of
A (low) (as defined by CBRS Inc.) or higher on senior debt securities on or before
December 31, 2001.
7.3 Debt Financing
The Distribution Company will optimize its debt financing in accordance with the provisions
of this Direction, in particular, subsection 2.3(a), Section 7.2 and subsection 7.5(c).
7.4 Dividend Policy
Subject to any law, the Distribution Company will pay to the Corporation a quarterly cash
dividend (the "Distribution Company Dividend") as follows:
(a) The Distribution Company Dividend will be the greater of $0 and the Distribution
Company Cash Flow adjusted for changes in cash balance to meet the Distribution
Company's ongoing operational requirements.
(b) Subject to subsections 7.4(d) and (e), the Distribution Company will pay the
Distribution Company Dividend on the last day of each of the Distribution
Company's fiscal quarters based upon the Distribution Company Cash Flow stated
in the operating and expenditure budget in the Business Plan then in effect (the
"Projected Distribution Company Cash Flow").
(c) Upon receipt, the Corporation will immediately pay two-thirds of the Distribution
Company Dividend to the Shareholder as a cash dividend.
(d) After the last quarterly payment of the Distribution Company Dividend for any fiscal
year, if the audited annual Financial Statements for such past fiscal year reveal that
the actual Distribution Company Cash Flow was different than the Projected
Distribution Company Cash Flow, the first quarterly payment for the immediately
following fiscal year shall be adjusted to reflect such actual Distribution Company
Cash Flow.
(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the obligation to pay the Distribution Company
Dividend will begin on January 1, 2000 and the first payment thereof will be made
on March 31, 2000.
The amount of the cash dividend paid by the Corporation to the Shareholder may be subject
to adjustment by the Shareholder from time to time based on the financial requirements of
the Shareholder or the Corporation.
7.5 Operation Policy
Toronto Hydro will:
(a) employ the most efficient cost structure available for like businesses;
(b) mandate the creation and implementation of cost reduction programs to ensure that
distribution costs are minimized; and
(c) maximize return on the Shareholder's equity.
7.6 Amendments
This Direction may be amended solely at the discretion of the Shareholder. The Shareholder
will provide prior written notice to the Board of any proposed amendments to this Direction.
DATED at Toronto this ______ day of _______________, 1999.
--------
Incorporation of Toronto Hydro Corporation - Appendix 2
Authority: Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee Report No. 10, Clause 1, adopted by
Council on June 9, 1999
Enacted by Council:
CITY OF TORONTO
Bill No.
BY-LAW No. - 1999
To transfer the employees, assets, liabilities, rights and obligations of the Toronto Hydro-Electric
Commission and the City of Toronto associated with the generation, distribution, transmission and
retailing of electricity and associated business activities to Toronto Hydro Corporation, Toronto
Hydro-Electric System Limited and Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc., Business Corporations Act
(Ontario) corporations to be incorporated under Section 142(1) of the Electricity Act, 1998 and
Sections 71 and 73 of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998.
WHEREAS under Section 145(1) of the Electricity Act, 1998 the Council may make by-laws
transferring employees, assets, liabilities, rights, and obligations of the City of Toronto (the "City")
or of a commission or other body through which the City generates, transmits, distributes or retails
electricity, to a Business Corporations Act corporation incorporated under Section 142 of the
Electricity Act, 1998;
AND WHEREAS the City generates, transmits, distributes and retails electricity through the Toronto
Hydro-Electric Commission;
AND WHEREAS Council is authorizing the incorporation of Toronto Hydro Corporation, Toronto
Hydro-Electric System Limited and Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. (collectively, the
"Corporations") under Section 142(1) of the Electricity Act, 1998 and Sections 71 and 73 of the
Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 for the purpose of generating, transmitting, distributing or retailing
electricity and associated business activities and the incorporation of any further Subsidiaries
necessary for carrying out any such activities;
The Council of the City of Toronto HEREBY ENACTS as follows:
1.1 Definitions.
As used in this By-law, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
A. ACT - The Electricity Act, 1998, and any regulations thereunder.
B. ASSETS - Except for Excluded Assets, all assets, interests, property, rights and
undertakings, registered or unregistered, secured or unsecured, of the Commission
and the City held or used by either of them for the purpose of generating,
distributing, transmitting or retailing electricity and carrying on associated business
activities on the Effective Date, including the following:
(1) Cash, Accounts Receivable - All of the cash on hand, and all accounts
receivable of the Commission including without limitation, all customer and
trade accounts, notes receivable, book debts and other debts due or accruing
to the Commission and the benefits of all security and security deposits for
such accounts and debts.
(2) Computer Hardware and Software - All computer hardware and software,
including all rights under licences and other agreements or instruments
relating thereto.
(3) Contracts, Rights - The full benefit of all franchise, licence or management
agreements and all other contracts, commitments, rights, choses in action,
benefits, arrangements, understandings, and agreements, written or oral, to
which the Commission is a party or otherwise including:
(a) All written or oral contracts, agreements, commitments,
undertakings, rights and arrangements.
(b) All forward commitments to the Commission for supplies or materials
entered into in the usual and ordinary course of business whether or
not there are any written contracts with respect thereto.
(4) Employee Agreements: All contracts, agreements, and commitments in
respect of Employees as at the Effective Date to which the Commission is a
party or by which it is bound, including:
(a) All collective agreements.
(b) All contracts of employment.
(5) Employee Plans: All employee benefit plans, pension plans, bonus or
incentive plans, employee medical insurance and disability plans and savings
plans.
(6) Goodwill: The goodwill of the Commission, including:
(a) The exclusive right of any of the Corporations to represent
themselves as carrying on a business in continuation of and in
succession to the Commission and the right to use any words
indicating that their business is so carried on.
(b) All records of sales, customer lists, customer data and supplier lists
of or used by the Commission.
(7) Insurance Policies - The full benefit of all policies of insurance of the
Commission.
(8) Intellectual Property - All of the right, title, benefit and interest of the
Commission in and to all registered trade marks, trade names, brand names,
patents and copyrights, all unregistered trade marks, trade names and
copyrights and all patent applications, trade mark registration applications
and copyright registration applications, both domestic and foreign, owned
or made by the Commission, including without limitation those described in
Schedule A.
(9) Inventories - All inventories and supplies including, but without limitation,
all finished goods, work in progress, raw materials, production and shipping
supplies and maintenance items and all other materials and supplies on hand
to be used or consumed in the production of products.
(10) Know-How - All patterns, plans, designs, research data, copyrights, trade
secrets and other proprietary know-how, processes, drawings, technology,
unpatented blueprints, flow-sheets, equipment and parts lists and
descriptions and related instructions, manuals, data, records and procedures
and any and all data owned or used by the Commission, and all licences,
agreements and other contracts and commitments relating to any of the
foregoing to which the Commission is a party.
(11) Licences and Permits - The full benefit of all licences, registrations, permits,
consents, quotas, approvals, certificates, and other authorizations including
those described in Schedule B.
(12) Machinery and Equipment - All machinery and equipment, metering and
measurement devices, hot water heaters and appliances and all goods and
chattels and other personal property and all tools, handling equipment,
furniture, furnishings and accessories.
(13) Plant, Building, Fixtures - All plant, buildings, structures, erections,
improvements, appurtenances and fixtures (including fixed machinery and
fixed equipment) conduits, pipes, poles, wires, rods, cables, fibres and other
apparatus, devices, appliances and equipment, materials, works, transformer
stations, transformers, vaults, transmission lines, distribution lines, ducts,
pipelines, fittings, apparatus, meters, wheresoever situate on property owned
by the Commission or the City, on private property and on public property.
(14) Prepaid Expenses - All pre-paid expenses and deposits the benefits of which
will accrue to any of the Corporations.
(15) Real Property Interests - All lands, premises, freehold and leasehold property
interests, mortgages, charges, agreements, notices of agreements, debentures
and security interests which create an interest in land, liens, easements,
rights of way, licences, and rights to use or occupy real property, and all
other rights or interests therein and fixtures thereon, including the relevant
interests in the assets listed in Schedule C.
(16) Records - All personnel records, inspection records and all other records,
books, documents and data bases relating to Employees, the Assumed
Liabilities, the business of the Commission, or to the Assets in the possession
or under the control of the Commission.
(17) Reserves - The portion of any reserve fund established pursuant to section 33
of the Development Charges Act, 1997 that relates to development charges
collected in respect of electrical power services, and the portion of any
reserve fund referred to in section 63 of the Development Charges Act, 1997
that relates to development charges collected in respect of electrical power
services, as set out in Schedule D.
(18) Vehicles - All trucks, cars and vehicles of all kinds.
(19) Warranties - The full benefit of all warranties and warranty rights, implied,
express or otherwise, against manufacturers, suppliers or sellers which apply
to any of the Assets and the net realizable value of any warranty claims
relating to the Assets outstanding as of the Effective Date.
C. ASSUMED LIABILITIES - Other than Excluded Liabilities, all of the debts, liabilities
and obligations of the Commission.
D. BODY CORPORATE - A firm, partnership, unincorporated association, joint
venture, body corporate, corporation, bank, trust, pension fund, union, government
agency, board, tribunal, ministry, or commission or other legal entity of any kind
whatsoever, but excludes an individual or natural person.
E. COMMISSION - The Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission, established under
Section 9 of the City of Toronto Act, 1997, and deemed a commission under Part III
of the Public Utilities Act.
F. EFFECTIVE DATE - The date for each transfer set out in Section 6-1.
G. EMPLOYEES - All full-time and part-time, union and non-union, employees and
officers of the Commission, including all trainees, and probationary employees, on
the Effective Date.
H. EXCLUDED ASSETS - The assets described in Schedule E.
I. EXCLUDED LIABILITIES - The liabilities described in Schedule F.
J. OBCA - The Business Corporations Act (Ontario), and any regulations thereunder.
K. OEB - The Ontario Energy Board.
L. OEBA - The Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, and any regulations thereunder.
M. PERSON - Any individual, a natural person or body corporate.
N. SUBSIDIARY - With respect to Toronto Hydro Corporation, any Body Corporate of
which more than 50 percent of the outstanding securities of any class carrying
exercisable voting rights are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by or for
Toronto Hydro Corporation, and includes any Body Corporate in like relation to a
Subsidiary.
1-2. Interpretation.
In this By-law, unless a contrary intention appears:
A Words importing the singular shall include the plural and vice versa and words
importing gender shall include all genders.
B. If any section of this By-law is invalid or ultra vires the City it shall not affect the
operation of the remaining portions of this By-law.
C. The following Schedules are attached and form part of this By-law:
(1) Schedule A - Intellectual Property
(2) Schedule B - Licences and Permits
(3) Schedule C - Real Property Interests
(4) Schedule D - Reserves
(5) Schedule E - Excluded Assets
(6) Schedule F - Excluded Liabilities
(7) Schedule G - Allocation of Consideration
D. This by-law is binding on the City, the Commission, the Corporations and all other
Persons.
E. In accordance with the Act, this By-law applies despite any general or special act or
any rule of law, including any act or rule of law which requires notice or registration
of transfers; provided, however, the Corporations may register such documents,
instruments and agreements, including certified copies of this By-law, as may be
necessary or desirable in order to evidence or confirm such transfers.
F. Where the context requires, Corporations shall include any Subsidiaries.
G. Under Subsections 9(4) and (5) of the City of Toronto Act, 1997, all of the assets and
liabilities and other rights and obligations relating to the distribution and supply of
electricity of the public utility commissions of the former municipalities of East York,
Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, Toronto and York were vested in the City under
the control and management of the Commission.
H. Under Subsections 9(2) of the City of Toronto Act, 1997, the Commission has all the
powers, rights, authorities and privileges of a municipal public utility commission
under Part III of the Public Utilities Act.
2-1. Incorporation.
A. The incorporation of Toronto Hydro Corporation, Toronto Hydro-Electric System
Limited and Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc., under the OBCA, to continue the
generation, transmission, distribution and retailing of electricity and associated
business activities of the Commission and the incorporation of any further
Subsidiaries necessary for any such activities is authorized.
B. Any common shares or other securities issued by any of the Corporations
incorporated pursuant to this By-law shall be issued upon such incorporation in the
name of the City.
2-2. Corporate, Shareholder Administration.
A. The City, in its capacity as initial shareholder of the Corporations, shall execute and
deliver any shareholder agreement, direction or declaration to provide for the
organization, management and administration of the Corporations and any further
Subsidiaries, in a form approved by Council of the City.
B. The City and the Commission shall execute and deliver to the Corporations, where
necessary, in form suitable for registration, recording and filing with such public
authorities as may be reasonably required by the Corporations, any bills of sale,
assignments, instruments of transfer, assurances, consents and other documents
necessary to effectively transfer to the Corporations all the City and the
Commission's right, title and interest in the Assets.
3-1. Transfer to Corporations.
A. All the Assets and Assumed Liabilities of the Commission and the City and
Employees associated with the generation, distribution, transmission and retailing
of electricity and associated business, except for the Excluded Assets and Excluded
Liabilities, are transferred to and assumed by the Corporations in accordance with
the Act and this By-law as set out in Subsections 3-1B, C, D, E and F.
B. On the Effective Date the Assets and Assumed Liabilities of the Commission and the
City used in connection with owning and operating an electricity transmission and
distribution system are transferred to and assumed by Toronto Hydro-Electric
System Limited.
C. On the Effective Date the Assets and Assumed Liabilities of the Commission and the
City used in connection with electricity generation, co-generation, district cooling
or other energy services are transferred to and assumed by Toronto Hydro Energy
Services Inc.
D. On the Effective Date the Employees of the Commission used in connection with
owning and operating an electricity transmission and distribution system are
transferred toToronto Hydro-Electric System Limited.
E. On the Effective Date the Employees of the Commission used in connection with
electricity generation, co-generation, district cooling or other energy services are
transferred to Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc.
F. Subject to an order of the OEB granting leave under Section 86 of the OEBA, the
City shall, and shall be deemed to, have transferred as of the Effective Date all of the
voting securities in Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited and Toronto Hydro
Energy Services Inc., which were issued to the City under Subsections 4-1B and D
of this By-law, to Toronto Hydro Corporation in consideration of the issuance to the
City of voting securities by Toronto Hydro Corporation.
G. Any of the Assets and Assumed Liabilities of the Commission and the City and
Employees which are transferred to the Corporations pursuant to this By-law may
be transferred to any Subsidiary on such terms and for such consideration as the
directors of the transferring Corporation may from time to time approve, subject to
Subsection 4-1H of this By-law. The City, the Commission or the Corporations may
enter into any agreements or other documents required to evidence the transfers.
H. The Employees transferred to the Corporations, in accordance with Sections 145 and
147 of the Act, shall cease to be Employees of the Commission from and including
the Effective Date and shall thereupon be employees of one of the Corporations.
I. Excluded Assets and Excluded Liabilities will not be transferred to the Corporations.
J. Despite any other provision of this By-law or the Electricity Act, 1998, if any of the
Assets shall not be assignable, or shall only be assignable with the consent or
approval of any other third party, the City or the Commission shall:
(1) use all efforts in co-operation with the assignee Corporation to secure the
consent required in connection with those assignments and all costs of
obtaining any consent will be paid by the assignee Corporation; and
(2) pending the effective transfer thereof, hold all rights or entitlements that the
City or the Commission has thereto in trust for the exclusive benefit of the
assignee Corporation provided that the assignee Corporation shall pay,
perform and discharge all obligations arising or accruing with respect
thereto during such period.
4-1. Consideration and Financing.
A. All costs and expenses incurred or to be incurred by the City and the Commission
and all Provincial taxes incurred or payable in connection with the transfer of the
Assets shall be borne by the Corporations and the Corporations shall reimburse the
City and the Commission on demand for any such costs, expenses or taxes.
B. The Assets transferred to Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited under
Subsection 3-1B of this By-law shall be transferred at their respective fair market
values on the Effective Date. The fair market value of the Assets shall be deemed to
be book value on the Effective Date subject to adjustment under Subsections 4-1H
and 5-1C of this By-law.The consideration payable by Toronto Hydro-Electric
System Limited for the Assets transferred under Subsection 3-1B shall be satisfied
as follows:
(1) by the assumption by Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited of the Assumed
Liabilities referred to in Subsection 3-1B; and
(2) as to the balance by:
(a) the issuance and allotment to the City of 1,000 fully paid and
non-assessable common shares of Toronto Hydro-Electric System
Limited having an ascribed value equal to 40 percent of such balance
which amount shall be added to the stated capital account for such
shares, and
(b) the issuance by Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited to the City of
a promissory note having a principal amount equal to 60 percent of
such balance, such note to be due and payable on December 31,
2000, to be non-interest bearing until December 31, 1999; and to
bear interest at an effective rate of 6% per annum from January 1,
2000 until the City chooses to redeem or until December 31, 2000,
whichever comes first, calculated and payable quarterly and to be in
form and content satisfactory to the Treasurer of the City.
C. On or before the maturity date of the promissory note referred to in
Subsection 4-1B(2)(b), the City, after consultation with Toronto Hydro Corporation,
may exchange the said promissory note for one or more debt instruments of Toronto
Hydro-Electric System Limited having a form and content satisfactory to the City as
evidenced by the written acceptance by the Treasurer of the City.
D. The Assets transferred to Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. under Subsection 3-1C
of this By-law shall be transferred at their respective fair market values on the
Effective Date. The fair market value of the Assets shall be deemed to be book value
on the Effective Date as determined under Subsections 4-1H and 5-1C of this
By-law. The consideration payable by Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. for the
Assets transferred under Subsection 3-1C shall be satisfied as follows:
(1) by the assumption by Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. of the Assumed
Liabilities referred to in Subsection 3-1C; and
(2) as to the balance by the issuance and allotment to the City of 1,000 fully paid
and non-assessable common shares of Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc.
having an ascribed value equal to the aforesaid balance which amount shall
be added to the stated capital account for such shares.
E. The transfer under Subsection 3-1F shall be deemed to have been effected at the
aggregate fair market value of such voting securities as determined by the City
Treasurer and an amount equal to such aggregate fair market value shall be added
to the stated capital account of the shares of Toronto Hydro Corporation.
F. The consideration payable by the Corporations shall be allocated among the Assets
as set out in Schedule G and the Corporations shall report the transfer of the Assets
in accordance with the provisions of Schedule G.
G. The Reserves are transferred to Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited to be used
only to pay for capital costs in respect of electrical power services for which the
Reserves were collected.
H. The fair market value of the Assets, and the amount of the Assumed Liabilities
transferred under this By-law to the Corporations on the Effective Date, shall be
determined by the Treasurer of the City in consultation with the Corporations.
I. The Corporations shall be bound by, assume, pay, satisfy, discharge, observe,
perform and fulfil, and indemnify and save harmless the City from and against the
Assumed Liabilities assumed by them respectively.
4-2. Transfer Exemptions.
A. Any transfer of Assets under this By-law is exempt from land transfer tax and retail
sales tax under Section 159 of the Act.
B. Any transfer of Assets under this By-law is exempt from the provisions of the Bulk
Sales Act (Ontario) under Section 159 of the Act.
C. Any transfer under this By-law will constitute the transfer of all or substantially all
of the Assets necessary for the relevant Corporation to carry on the business
transferred to it as a business. The City and the relevant Corporation, both being
registered for Goods and Services Tax purposes, undertake to sign the election
provided for in Section 167 of the Excise Tax Act and the relevant Corporation shall
file the election in accordance with the provisions of that Section so that the transfer
is not subject to Goods and Services Tax.
5-1. Consideration Adjustment.
A. The fair market value of the Assets transferred under Subsection 3-1B of this By-law
is dependent upon the permitted rate of return on equity and the rates that the OEB
will allow Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited to charge for the distribution of
electricity under the OEBA.
B. The fair market value of the Assets transferred and the consideration payable in
Subsections 4-1B and D of this By-law may be adjusted as a consequence of any
OEB rate order for the year 2000 or subsequent years and any valuation of the
Assets subsequent to the enactment of this By-law.
C. Any consideration or revised consideration payable under this By-law shall be
determined by the Treasurer of the City in consultation with the Corporations.
D. All necessary adjustments to the consideration payable under this By-law shall have
the same effect as if they were made on the Effective Date
6-1. Effective Date of Transfer.
A. The Effective Date of the transfers set out in Subsections 3-1B, C and F is July 1,
1999.
B. The Effective Date of the transfers set out in Subsections 3-1D, E and H is January 1,
2000.
ENACTED AND PASSED this day of , A.D.
SCHEDULE A
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
(Trademarks, Official Marks, Patents, Copyrights, and Business Names)
|
Applicant/Registrant/Owner |
Application
No.
|
Registration
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TORONTO HYDRO |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
699,404 |
437,077 |
TH TORONTO HYDRO &
DESIGN |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
699,406 |
448,192 |
CITISOURCE |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
876,217 |
Not registered |
THE CITISOURCE |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
878,412 |
Not registered |
CITISOURCE TORONTO |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
878,413 |
Not registered |
CITISOURCE (US) |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
75/511,523 |
Not registered |
POWERSHIFT |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
699,405 |
416,682 |
|
|
|
|
Official Marks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TORONTO HYDRO |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
905,223 |
|
TORONTO HYDRO &
DESIGN |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
905,222 |
|
CITISOURCE |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
909,905 |
|
TORONTO ENERGY
CORPORATION |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
908,410 |
|
POWERSHIFT |
Toronto Electric Commissioners |
905,216 |
|
COMMITTED TO QUALITY |
The Public Utilities Commission of
the City of Scarborough |
906,210 |
|
S DESIGN |
The Public Utilities Commission of
the City of Scarborough |
906,697 |
|
YORK HYDRO & DESIGN |
The Hydro-Electric Commission of
the City of York |
904,640 |
|
EAST YORK HYDRO &
DESIGN |
The Hydro-Electric Commission of
the Borough of East York |
905,366 |
|
NYH DESIGN |
North York Hydro |
901,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CABLE SPLICING DEVICE |
Arthur Bevis; Rickey Butler; Toronto
Electric Commissioners |
Canadian -2,213,643 |
|
|
|
British -
9717661.4 |
|
|
|
German -
196 81 253.4 |
|
Connector For Use in Cable
Splices (same as Cable Splicing
Device) |
|
U.S. -
393,645 |
U.S. Patent No.
US 5,527,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMART Planning Tool |
The Public Utilities Commission of
the City of Scarborough |
|
460015 |
Quality Assurance - Electrical
Metrology |
North York Hydro |
|
450074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Names |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toronto Hydro |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
Toronto Hydro-Electric System |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
Etobicoke Hydro |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
East York Hydro-Electric
Commission |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
East York Hydro |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
North York Hydro |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
York Hydro |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
Scarborough Utilities |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
Scarborough Public Utilities
Commission |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
S.P.U.C. |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
Scarborough PUC |
Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
(Unregistered) |
|
|
|
Etobicoke Hydro Logo |
The Hydro-Electric Commission of
the City of Etobicoke |
|
|
Greensource* |
|
|
|
Our City's Source For Energy* |
|
|
|
Toronto Hydro Logo* |
|
|
|
*Trademark applications to be filed with CIPO by the Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission.
--------
SCHEDULE B
LICENSES AND PERMITS
1. Metering Certification:
Issued By: Measurement Canada
Title: Accreditation Certificate U/S - 007
Description: Permits verification and re-verification of electricity meters including
compliance sampling
2. Certificate of Approval for Transport of PCBs
Issued By: Ministry of Environment
Title: Provisional Certificate of Approval No. A-840375
Description: Permits transport of PCB waste to Ontario PCB disposal sites
3. Exemption for Transport of Asbestos
Issued By: Ministry of Environment (Approvals Branch)
Title: Field Operations Exemption, as set out in correspondence dated
March 23, 1998 to David Burnett
Description: Permits transport of asbestos
4. Radio Licenses
Issued By: Industry Canada
Title: Radio Licenses
Description: Various radio licenses permitting possession, installation and operation of
radio equipment
5. PCB Storage Site Registrations
Issued By: Ministry of Environment
Title: 301-87A-010 for 3 Dohme Ave, East York
301-82A-028 for 10 Belfield Rd, Etobicoke
301-86A-057 for 50 Toryork Dr, North York
301-88A-032 for 2 Bicknell Ave, Toronto
301-86A-032 for 28 Underwriters Rd, Scarborough
301-96A-003 for 211 Sterling Rd, Toronto
301-94A-058 for 450 Commissioners St, Toronto
301-89A-025 for 2357 Danforth Ave, Toronto
301-85A-023 for 369 Carlaw Ave, Toronto
301-86A-023 for 532 Bay St, Toronto
301-85A-025 for 13-19 Wiltshire Ave, Toronto
Description: Various site registrations permitting storage of PCBs
6 Interim Distributor License issued to Toronto Hydro pursuant to section 129 of the
Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 (Ontario).
--------
SCHEDULE C
REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS
1 |
233 Adelaide Street East |
Toronto |
2 |
660 Adelaide Street West |
Toronto |
3 |
23 - 25 Basin Street |
Toronto |
4 |
399 Bathurst Street |
Toronto |
5 |
2500 Bathurst St. |
Toronto |
6 |
532 Bay Street |
Toronto |
7 |
777 Bay Street (Suites 403,405,423) |
Toronto |
8 |
20 Blackburn Street |
Toronto |
9 |
Bridgement Park - East |
Toronto |
|
Lots 251,252 Plan M-6 |
|
10 |
Bridgement Park - North |
Toronto |
|
Lot 259 Plan M-6 |
|
11 |
Bridgement Park - South |
Toronto |
|
Lots 241, 246 Plan M-6 |
|
12 |
45 Bulwer Street |
Toronto |
13 |
345 Carlaw Avenue |
Toronto |
14 |
369 Carlaw Avenue |
Toronto |
15 |
14 Carlton Street |
Toronto |
16 |
20 Carlton Street |
Toronto |
17 |
38 Cecil Street |
Toronto |
18 |
327 Chaplin Crescent |
Toronto |
19 |
83 Charles Street East |
Toronto |
20 |
100 Cherry Street |
Toronto |
21 |
281 Cherry Street |
Toronto |
22 |
955 College Street |
Toronto |
23 |
440 Commissioners Street |
Toronto |
24 |
450 Commissioners Street |
Toronto |
25 |
500 Commissioners Street |
Toronto |
26 |
300 Coxwell Ave |
Toronto |
27 |
2357 Danforth Avenue |
Toronto |
28 |
391 Davenport Road |
Toronto |
29 |
65 Dickens Street |
Toronto |
30 |
730 Dovercourt Court |
Toronto |
31 |
1045 Dufferin Street |
Toronto |
32 |
1047 Dufferin Street |
Toronto |
33 |
744 Dundas Street East |
Toronto |
34 |
245 Dunn Avenue |
Toronto |
35 |
390 - 400 Duplex Avenue. |
Toronto |
|
(60 Eglinton Ave. W.) |
|
36 |
146 Dupont Street |
Toronto |
37 |
905 Dupont Street |
Toronto |
38 |
652 Eastern Avenue |
Toronto |
39 |
30 Edwin Avenue |
Toronto |
40 |
386 Eglinton Avenue East |
Toronto |
41 |
50 Eglinton Avenue West |
Toronto |
42 |
85 Elm Ridge Drive |
Toronto |
43 |
96 Gerrard Street |
Toronto |
44 |
542 Gladstone Avenue |
Toronto |
45 |
23 Granby |
Toronto |
46 |
130 Hammersmith Avenue |
Toronto |
47 |
37 Hanna Avenue rear |
Toronto |
48 |
144 Hazelwood Avenue |
Toronto |
49 |
Island Sub-Station situated in a building |
Toronto |
|
located at Island Filtration Plant, |
|
|
Central Island |
|
51 |
2 Jane Street |
|
52 |
101 Jefferson Avenue |
Toronto |
53 |
1080 Kingston Road |
Toronto |
54 |
2 Labatt Avenue |
Toronto |
55 |
446 Lakeshore Avenue |
Toronto |
56 |
885 Lakeshore Blvd E. |
Toronto |
57 |
444 Logan Avenue |
Toronto |
58 |
106 Lower Sherbourne Street |
Toronto |
59 |
290-296 MacPherson Avenue |
Toronto |
60 |
315 & 325 MacPherson Avenue |
Toronto |
61 |
365 MacPherson Avenue |
Toronto |
62 |
375 - 383 Madison Avenue |
Toronto |
63 |
640 Millwood Road |
Toronto |
64 |
394 Mount Pleasant Road |
Toronto |
65 |
35 Mowat Avenue |
Toronto |
66 |
19-47 Nelson Street |
Toronto |
67 |
45 Oakmount Avenue |
Toronto |
68 |
161 Oakwood Avenue |
Toronto |
69 |
93 Ontario Street |
Toronto |
70 |
740 Pape Avenue |
Toronto |
71 |
61 Pelham Park Avenue |
Toronto |
72 |
18 Portland Street |
Toronto |
73 |
1457 Queen Street West |
Toronto |
74 |
1 Rennie Terrace Rear |
Toronto |
75 |
508 - 510 (518,522) Runnymede Road |
Toronto |
76 |
546 Sherbourne Street (147 Isabella) |
Toronto |
77 |
298 Sorauren Avenue Rear |
Toronto |
78 |
242 South Kingsway |
Toronto |
79 |
5 Southport Street |
Toronto |
80 |
473 Spadina Crescent |
Toronto |
81 |
555 Spadina Road |
Toronto |
82 |
1860 St Clair Avenue West |
Toronto |
83 |
165 Stephenson Avenue |
Toronto |
84 |
211 Sterling Road |
Toronto |
85 |
6 Strachan Avenue |
Toronto |
86 |
8 Strachan Avenue |
Toronto |
87 |
16 Tecumseth St. |
Toronto |
88 |
120 - 124 Tecumseth St. |
Toronto |
89 |
180 Wellesley Avenue |
Toronto |
90 |
253 Wellington Street West |
Toronto |
91 |
7 Wiltshire Avenue |
Toronto |
92 |
19 Wiltshire Avenue |
Toronto |
93 |
39 Wiltshire Avenue |
Toronto |
94 |
137 Winona Drive |
Toronto |
95 |
25 (20) Wood St. |
Toronto |
96 |
2833 Yonge Street |
Toronto |
97 |
Albion Road |
Etobicoke |
|
Part 1, Plan 66R-10509 and |
|
|
Part 3, Plan 66R-9511 |
|
98 |
26 Algie Avenue |
Etobicoke |
99 |
1 Annabelle Drive |
Etobicoke |
100 |
15 Arcot Blvd. |
Etobicoke |
101 |
55 Ashbourne Drive |
Etobicoke |
102 |
Attwell MS |
Etobicoke |
|
Part 4, Plan 64R-6352 |
|
103 |
10 Belfield Road |
Etobicoke |
104 |
121 Belfield Road |
Etobicoke |
105 |
10 Bellman Avenue |
Etobicoke |
106 |
132 Berry Road |
Etobicoke |
107 |
196 Bethridge Road |
Etobicoke |
108 |
124 Birmingham Street |
Etobicoke |
109 |
4237 Bloor Street |
Etobicoke |
110 |
756 Brown's Line |
Etobicoke |
111 |
16 Burlingame Road |
Etobicoke |
112 |
Burnhamthorpe Road . |
Etobicoke |
|
Pt Lot 20, Conc 1 |
|
113 |
790 Burnhamthorpe Road |
Etobicoke |
114 |
70 Cannon Road |
Etobicoke |
115 |
139 Carlingview Drive |
Etobicoke |
116 |
367 Carlingview Drive |
Etobicoke |
117 |
56 Centennial Park Road |
Etobicoke |
118 |
90 Cordova Avenue (1276 Islington Avenue) |
Etobicoke |
119 |
59 Dalegrove Crescent |
Etobicoke |
120 |
174 Dixon Road |
Etobicoke |
121 |
298 Dixon Road |
Etobicoke |
122 |
1 Duffield Road |
Etobicoke |
123 |
64 Dunsany Crescent |
Etobicoke |
124 |
62(66) Elmhurst Drive |
Etobicoke |
125 |
194 Evans Avenue |
Etobicoke |
126 |
61 Fieldway Road |
Etobicoke |
127 |
59 Glen Agar Drive |
Etobicoke |
128 |
74 Guided Court |
Etobicoke |
129 |
2 Guiness Avenue |
Etobicoke |
130 |
39 Gunton Drive |
Etobicoke |
131 |
33 Hardwick Court |
Etobicoke |
132 |
267 Humberline Road |
Etobicoke |
133 |
63 Hunting Ridge |
Etobicoke |
134 |
913 Islington Avenue |
Etobicoke |
135 |
1066 Islington Avenue |
Etobicoke |
136 |
1442 Islington Avenue |
Etobicoke |
137 |
1720 Islington Avenue |
Etobicoke |
138 |
2310 Islington Avenue |
Etobicoke |
139 |
95 Kingsview Blvd |
Etobicoke |
140 |
Kipling Avenue, Hollywood MS |
Etobicoke |
|
Pt Lot 6, Plan 1990 |
|
141 |
2130 Kipling Avenue |
Etobicoke |
142 |
74 Leading Road |
Etobicoke |
143 |
34 Legion Road |
Etobicoke |
144 |
1 Longfeild Road |
Etobicoke |
145 |
21 Manstor Road |
Etobicoke |
146 |
2094 Martingrove Road |
Etobicoke |
147 |
2236 Martingrove Road |
Etobicoke |
148 |
25 McLachlan Drive |
Etobicoke |
149 |
119 Mill Road |
Etobicoke |
150 |
121 Mimico Avenue |
Etobicoke |
151 |
8 Newell Court |
Etobicoke |
152 |
88 North Queen Street |
Etobicoke |
153 |
318 Prince Edward Drive |
Etobicoke |
|
Pt Lots 4,5,6 Plan 2318 |
|
154 |
2 Rampart Road |
Etobicoke |
155 |
395 Rathburn Road |
Etobicoke |
156 |
54 Reid Manor |
Etobicoke |
157 |
307 Rexdale Blvd |
Etobicoke |
158 |
Royal York Road |
Etobicoke |
|
Centre Drive MS, |
|
|
Pt Lot 54, Plan 965 |
|
159 |
714 Royal York Road |
Etobicoke |
160 |
1179 Royal York Road |
Etobicoke |
161 |
294 Scarlett Road |
Etobicoke |
162 |
746 Scarlett Road |
Etobicoke |
163 |
78 Shaver Avenue South |
Etobicoke |
164 |
17 Sinclair Street |
Etobicoke |
165 |
153 Taysham Crescent |
Etobicoke |
166 |
395 The East Mall |
Etobicoke |
167 |
360 The West Mall |
Etobicoke |
168 |
510 The West Mall |
Etobicoke |
169 |
191 The West Way |
Etobicoke |
170 |
55 (63B) Thistletown Blvd |
Etobicoke |
171 |
40 Torrington Drive |
Etobicoke |
172 |
18 Warbeck Place |
Etobicoke |
173 |
40 Watercliff Road |
Etobicoke |
174 |
127 Westmore Drive |
Etobicoke |
175 |
130 Westrose Avenue |
Etobicoke |
176 |
Windsor Street |
Etobicoke |
|
Pt Lots 177,180 Plan 164 |
|
177 |
27 Wingrove Hill |
Etobicoke |
178 |
Part Lot 25, Conc 1 |
Etobicoke |
179 |
Lot 192, Plan 5719 |
Etobicoke |
180 |
3706 Bathurst Street |
North York |
181 |
2065 Bayview Avenue |
North York |
182 |
130 Bond Avenue |
North York |
183 |
18 Brenthall Avenue |
North York |
184 |
1 Broadlands Blvd |
North York |
185 |
165 Burbank Drive |
North York |
186 |
941 Caledonia Road |
North York |
187 |
283 Churchill Avenue |
North York |
188 |
25 Combermere Drive |
North York |
189 |
639 Conacher Drive |
North York |
190 |
38 Cummer Avenue |
North York |
191 |
39 Deauville Lane |
North York |
192 |
Don Mills Centre MS, |
North York |
|
Pt Blk A, Plan 4545 |
|
193 |
907 Don Mills Road |
North York |
194 |
223 Elmhurst Avenue |
North York |
195 |
635 Fenmar Drive |
North York |
196 |
175 Goddard Street |
North York |
197 |
169 Goulding Avenue |
North York |
198 |
29 Heathrow Drive |
North York |
199 |
65 Hobson Avenue |
North York |
200 |
1950 Islington Avenue |
North York |
201 |
4206 Jane Street |
North York |
202 |
Jonesville Rd Allowance, |
North York |
|
Part 1, Plan 64R-11703 |
|
204 |
802 Lawrence Avenue East |
North York |
205 |
1857 Leslie Street |
North York |
206 |
5733 Leslie Street |
North York |
207 |
1 Lochinvar Street |
North York |
208 |
4 Milvan Drive |
North York |
209 |
58 Northdale Road |
North York |
210 |
22 Norton Avenue |
North York |
211 |
2756 Old Leslie Street |
North York |
212 |
105 Orfus Road |
North York |
213 |
85 Pemberton Avenue, |
North York |
|
Lots 125,126 Plan 2233 |
|
214 |
12 Rivalda Road |
North York |
215 |
522 (520) Rustic Road |
North York |
216 |
1508 Sentinel Road |
North York |
217 |
144 (148) Shelborne Avenue |
North York |
218 |
1629 Sheppard Avenue West |
North York |
219 |
Sheppard Avenue West |
North York |
|
Pt Lot 16, Conc 3, W/Yonge |
|
220 |
1 Signet Drive |
North York |
221 |
180 (184) Sloane Avenue |
North York |
222 |
40 & 50 Toryork Drive |
North York |
223 |
282 Upper Highland Crescent |
North York |
224 |
11 Victory Drive |
North York |
225 |
77 Whitbread Crescent |
North York |
226 |
186 Willowdale Avenue |
North York |
227 |
228 Wilson Avenue |
North York |
228 |
1304 Wilson Avenue |
North York |
229 |
405 Woburn Avenue |
North York |
230 |
1 Wyvern Road |
North York |
231 |
4044 Yonge Street |
North York |
232 |
5800 Yonge Street |
North York |
233 |
1255 York Mills |
North York |
234 |
331 York Mills Road |
North York |
235 |
150 August Avenue |
Scarborough |
236 |
25 Bellamy Road North |
Scarborough |
237 |
119 Bellamy Road North |
Scarborough |
238 |
510 Bellamy Road |
Scarborough |
239 |
694 Birchmount Road |
Scarborough |
240 |
1047 Birchmount Road |
Scarborough |
241 |
54 Brian Avenue |
Scarborough |
242 |
90 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
243 |
96 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
244 |
531 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
245 |
657 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
246 |
816 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
247 |
1221 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
248 |
1994 Brimley Road |
Scarborough |
249 |
3 Bernadine Street |
Scarborough |
250 |
2 Canadian Road |
Scarborough |
251 |
29 Canadian Road |
Scarborough |
252 |
110 Canadian Road |
Scarborough |
253 |
Canadine Road SS, Pt Lot 1, Plan 3711 |
Scarborough |
254 |
Cavehill Crescent, Blk B, Plan 5317 |
Scarborough |
255 |
191 Centennial Road |
Scarborough |
256 |
61 Civic Road |
Scarborough |
257 |
Clonmore Drive MS, Lot 9-11, Plan 1756 |
Scarborough |
258 |
57 Comstock Road |
Scarborough |
259 |
590 Coronation Drive |
Scarborough |
260 |
39 Craighton Drive |
Scarborough |
261 |
243 East Avenue |
Scarborough |
262 |
47 Elinor Avenue |
Scarborough |
263 |
159 Ellesmere Road |
Scarborough |
264 |
867 Ellesmere Road |
Scarborough |
265 |
156 Fallingbrook Road |
Scarborough |
266 |
3200 Finch Avenue East |
Scarborough |
267 |
37 (51) Galloway Road |
Scarborough |
268 |
30 Greencedar Circuit |
Scarborough |
269 |
104 Hollis Avenue |
Scarborough |
270 |
754 (750) Huntingwood Drive |
Scarborough |
271 |
750 Kennedy Road |
Scarborough |
272 |
3065 Kingston Road |
Scarborough |
273 |
3077 Kingston Road |
Scarborough |
274 |
3359 Kingston Road |
Scarborough |
275 |
3375 (3365) Kingston Road |
Scarborough |
276 |
4446 Kingston Road |
Scarborough |
277 |
2355 Lawrence Ave. E. |
Scarborough |
278 |
3782 (3780) Lawrence Ave. E. |
Scarborough |
279 |
74 Livingston Road |
Scarborough |
280 |
2505 Livingston Road |
Scarborough |
281 |
10 Lupin Dr. |
Scarborough |
282 |
46 Malamute Crescent |
Scarborough |
283 |
212 Markham Road |
Scarborough |
284 |
940 Markham Road |
Scarborough |
285 |
705 McCowan Rd. |
Scarborough |
286 |
486 Midland Avenue |
Scarborough |
287 |
676 Midland Avenue |
Scarborough |
288 |
1365 Midland Avenue |
Scarborough |
289 |
2753 Midland Avenue |
Scarborough |
290 |
720 Military Trail |
Scarborough |
291 |
105 Millikin Blvd |
Scarborough |
292 |
160 Morningside Avenue |
Scarborough |
293 |
351 Morrish Road |
Scarborough |
294 |
83 North Bonnington Avenue |
Scarborough |
295 |
150 Orton Park Road |
Scarborough |
296 |
300 Palmdale Drive |
Scarborough |
297 |
Pharmacy Avenue, Pt Lot 4, Plan 1079 |
Scarborough |
298 |
895 Progress Avenue |
Scarborough |
299 |
22 Rosscowan Street |
Scarborough |
300 |
4 Saunders Road |
Scarborough |
301 |
1000 Scarboro Golf Club Road |
Scarborough |
302 |
3762 Sheppard Avenue East |
Scarborough |
303 |
Sinnott Road, Pt Lot 3, Plan 3759 |
Scarborough |
304 |
3135 St. Clair Ave. E. |
Scarborough |
305 |
52 (50) Sunderland Crescent |
Scarborough |
306 |
60 Tiffield Road |
Scarborough |
307 |
7 Trestleside Grove |
Scarborough |
308 |
28 Underwriters Road |
Scarborough |
309 |
46 Wexford Blvd |
Scarborough |
310 |
Blk F, Plan 7725 |
Scarborough |
311 |
Part Lot 28, Conc 4 |
Scarborough |
312 |
Lot 415, Plan 2050 |
Scarborough |
313 |
Pt Lots 45,46,47 Plan 319 |
Scarborough |
314 |
327 Cedarvale Avenue |
East York |
315 |
258 Cosburn Avenue |
East York |
316 |
465A Cosburn Avenue |
East York |
317 |
171 Dawes Road |
East York |
318 |
30 Fairside Avenue |
East York |
319 |
10 Gamble Avenue |
East York |
320 |
Pottery Road SS, Pt Lot 13, 14 Con 2 |
East York |
321 |
410 Gilbert Avenue |
York |
322 |
Roselawn Avenue at Dansbury Avenue, Part |
York |
|
of Dansbury Avenue, Plan 1775 |
|
--------
SCHEDULE D
RESERVES
Development Charges Fund The funds received are for specific growth related
capital works to be undertaken.
Reserve Deposits Represents amounts received from third parties
which are restricted as to use for specific purposes.
Construction Deposit Collateral Funds Advance deposits received from contractors
--------
SCHEDULE E
EXCLUDED ASSETS
A. Real Property Interests
ADDRESS |
LOCATION |
TYPE |
DATE
AVAILABLE |
ASSESSMENT
VALUE |
14/18 Dyas Road |
North York |
Office/Service |
October 2001 |
$1,909,300 |
1530 Markham Road |
Scarborough |
Office |
October 2001 |
$5,402,000 |
2 Civic Centre Court |
Etobicoke |
Office |
April 2000 |
$3,531,725 |
2 Bicknell Avenue |
York |
Service |
1999 |
$301,000 |
700 Huron |
Toronto |
Service |
1998 |
$5,021,000 |
200 Madison Avenue |
Toronto |
Service |
1998 |
$433,000 |
15 Rotherham Avenue |
York |
Service |
July 1999 |
$826,000 |
1652 Keele Street |
York |
Office |
April 1999 |
$1,148,000 |
175 Memorial Park |
East York |
Office |
April 1999 |
$1,053,000 |
3 Dohme Avenue |
East York |
Service |
October 1999 |
$588,000 |
325 Chaplin Crescent |
Toronto |
Service |
October 1999 |
$609,000 |
118A & 120 Pearl Street |
Toronto |
Lease -TDHC |
July 1999 |
$1,723,000 |
8270 Sheppared Avenue |
Scarborough |
Lease -Yard |
September 2000 |
$1,022,422 |
2756 Old Leslie Street |
North York |
Yard/Building |
April 2000 |
202,000 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
$23,769,447 |
B. Other
Cash in the amount of one hundred million dollars (Cdn $100,000,000.00).
Plus interest payable from July 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 on the outstanding
debentures of $76,386,000 issued by City for the benefit of Toronto Hydro.
To be adjusted to July 1, 1999
--------
SCHEDULE F
EXCLUDED LIABILITIES
Long Term Debt (Net of sinking funds) incurred by the City of Toronto on behalf of the Toronto
Hydro-Electric Commission.
As at December 31, 1998:
Sinking fund debenture, due July 6, 1999
(stated rate 10.13%, effective 10.37%) $830,000
Sinking fund debenture, due November 30, 1999
(stated rate 10.00%, effective rate 10.23%) $1,134,000
Instalment debenture, due June 8, 2005
(effective rate 8.17%) $25,933,000
Sinking fund debenture, due June 28, 2006
(stated rate 7.85%, effective rate 7.96%) $25,241,000
Sinking fund debenture, due August 15, 2007
Total amount $76,386,000
--------
SCHEDULE G
ALLOCATION OF CONSIDERATION
Toronto Hydro-Electric Systems Limited |
As at December 31, 1998 |
In $thousands |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
Cash and investments |
|
$ 81,870 |
Accounts receivable |
|
129,204 |
Unbilled revenue |
|
115,860 |
Inventories |
|
|
34,567 |
Other current assets |
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
363,416 |
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets |
|
1,477,118 |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
Deferred charges |
|
20,670 |
Development charges |
|
2,817 |
Other assets |
|
5,449 |
|
|
|
28,936 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ 1,869,470 |
|
|
|
|
Less: Assumed Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
Due to Ontario Hydro |
$ 145,907 |
Accounts payable and accruals |
68,025 |
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
11,508 |
Provision for vacation pay |
5,654 |
|
|
|
231,094 |
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
Customers' advance deposits |
21,455 |
Other deposits |
|
4,651 |
Accumulated sick leave credits |
13,859 |
Voluntary exit incentive retirement supplement |
7,724 |
Workers' compensation benefits |
5,150 |
Development charges fund |
2,817 |
Provision for environmental costs |
3,676 |
|
|
|
59,332 |
|
|
|
|
Net Transfer |
|
$ 1,579,044 |
|
|
|
|
Consideration: |
|
|
Promissory Note |
|
947,426 |
Equity |
|
|
631,618 |
|
|
|
$ 1,579,044 |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
Cash and investments |
|
$ 40,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
$ 40,000 |
|
|
|
|
Assumed Liabilities |
|
nil |
|
|
|
|
Net Transfer |
|
|
$ 40,000 |
|
|
|
|
Consideration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 40,000 |
To be adjusted to July 1, 1999.)
2
Resources for Access and Equity Functions and
Final Recommendations of the Task Force on
Community Access and Equity
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by:
(1) striking out and referring Recommendation No. (2) of the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee to the Chief Administrative Officer, with a request that he submit a report to the
Policy and Finance Committee on the human resources and cost implications of the
recommendations of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity, and providing
clarification of the term "Employment Equity", viz.:
"(2) the adoption of the Action Plan and Final Recommendations of the Task Force on
Community Access and Equity appended to the report (May 27, 1999) from
Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair, Task Force on Community Access and Equity, with
the exception of Recommendations Nos. (11) and (13);"; and
(2) adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that:
(a) a copy of this Clause be forwarded to the Executive Committee of the Federation of
Canadian Municipalities with a request that it be placed before the Standing
Committee on Race Relations of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and
studied and compared with other best practice initiatives from other cities;
(b) the Federation of Canadian Municipalities be advised that the City of Toronto
assigns a high priority to this work;
(c) the Executive Committee of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities be requested
to consider the inclusion of Councillors Faubert, McConnell, and Shaw on the
membership of its Committee on Race Relations;
(d) the report dated June 7, 1999, from the Chief Administrative Officer, be received;
and
(e) the following motion be referred to the Chief Administrative Officer:
Moved by Councillor Miller:
'That Recommendation No. (48) of the Action Plan and Final
Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity be
amended by adding thereto the words "and that a working group on
employment equity be established as set out in Recommendation No. (21)(c)",
so that such Recommendation shall now read as follows:
"(48) that the City adopt an employment equity policy to achieve a
workforce which reflects the population at all occupational levels of
the City and that a working group on employment equity be
established as set out in Recommendation No. (21)(c)." ' ")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends:
(1) the adoption of the report (May 19, 1999) from the Chief Administrative Officer; and
(2) the adoption of the Action Plan and Final Recommendations of the Task Force on
Community Access and Equity appended to the report (May 27, 1999) from Councillor
Joe Mihevc, Chair, Task Force on Community Access and Equity, with the exception
of Recommendations Nos. (11) and (13).
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports, for the information of Council, having
referred Recommendations Nos. (11) and (13) of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity
to the Chief Administrative Officer for report thereon to the meeting of Council scheduled to be held
on June 9, 1999.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following report (May 19, 1999)
from the Chief Administrative Officer:
Purpose:
This report:
(a) summarizes the resource implications of the recommendations contained in the draft final
report of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity; and
(b) presents an approach to the organization of administrative structures for access and equity
functions in the City that accommodate the aspirations of the Task Force within the financial
constraints of the corporation.
Financial Implications:
The organizational structures defined in this report can be achieved within the approved 1999
Operating Budget but require the transfer of funds for corporate access and equity services between
departments as recommended in the report.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the corporate Access and Equity Unit work with each commissioner to define the functions
and reporting relationships for the assignment of dedicated corporate access and equity staff
resources to assist individual departments in meeting access and equity objectives;
(2) the staff positions that were reassigned from the pool of corporate access and equity
resources to the human resources business units in 1998 be explicitly defined and function
as employment equity and human rights consultants, and the Executive Director of Human
Resources report to the Administration Committee on how the expertise and skills of these
employment equity and human rights consultants are being used to enhance the activities of
the human resources business units;
(3) the 1999 approved budget of $1,501,000.00 total gross expenditures ($1,471,000.00 total net
expenditures) and 21.3 equivalent funded staff positions for Access and Equity services be
transferred from the Human Resources Division in the Corporate Services Department to the
Strategic and Corporate Policy Division in the Chief Administrator's Office to facilitate the
transfer of program management and administration of the corporate Access and Equity Unit
from the Corporate Services Department to the Chief Administrator's Office, and the 1999
Operating Budget be adjusted accordingly;
(4) once in each term of Council, the City Auditor oversee an internal audit of the performance
by the corporation as a whole in achieving its access, equity and human rights goals;
(5) in order to ensure that there is a an external community perspective on the City's progress
towards access, equity and human rights goals, the City organize an annual community
consultation on access, equity and human rights issues that will provide input to planning,
policy and program development in subsequent years;
(6) the Task Force on Community Access and Equity be requested to take this report into
consideration during the preparation of its final report to Council; and
(7) the appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Council Reference:
On January 2, 6, 8 and 9, 1998, City Council adopted Report No. 1 of the Striking Committee, which
established a Task Force on Community Access and Equity and appointed Councillor Joe Mihevc
as its chair.
The Task Force's terms of reference were adopted as amended by Council on March 4, 5 and 6, 1998
(Special Committee to Review the Final Report of the Toronto Transition Team Report No. 3 (6)).
The terms of reference described the goals and objectives of the Task Force as identifying the
necessary policies, structural functions, program priorities and evaluation processes by which the
City of Toronto can:
(i) strengthen civic society, and in particular empower those members of the community who
face barriers to full participation in the life of the community;
(ii) take a more effective role in addressing the barriers faced by women, people of colour,
Aboriginal people, people with disabilities, lesbians and gays, immigrants/refugees, different
religious/faith communities;
(iii) strengthen community involvement and public participation in the decision-making
processes of the municipality, particularly for equity seeking communities;
(iv) continue the City's proactive role in linking and partnering with other institutions and
agencies, as well as with the community, in engaging in initiatives in support of access and
equity;
(v) ensure that the contributions, interests and needs of all sectors of Toronto's diverse
population are reflected in the City's mission, operation and service delivery; and
(vi) continue the City's leadership in the community as a model employer with a workforce that
reflects the diversity of its residents and follows fair and equitable employment practices.
The Chair of the Task Force submitted a draft final report to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee on January 26, 1999.(1) The committee referred the report from the Task Force Chair to
the Chief Administrative Officer and requested him to report back to the committee on the financial
implications of the report.
On February 2, 3 and 4, 1999, Council extended the mandate of the Task Force to enable it to
consider the Chief Administrative Officer's report in the finalization of the Task Force report.
This report responds to the request by the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee. During the
preparation of this report, staff:
(a) surveyed departments in regard to the implications of the Task Force's draft
recommendations;
(b) interviewed a large sample of staff involved in access and equity activities;
(c) reviewed various written materials provided by the departments and the interim Access and
Equity Unit;
(d) met with the chair of the Task Force throughout the process; and
(e) retained the services of a general management consultant to assist with the review of options
for the administrative organization of access and equity functions.
Background:
Task Force Draft Recommendations:
The Draft Report of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity contains 82
recommendations. The majority of the recommendations pertain to the City's policies and programs.
They propose development of specific corporate policies and positions, development or review of
operational policies, and development or review of specific programs and initiatives. The primary
impact of such recommendations is on the commitment of human and financial resources and on the
establishment of priorities in program plans.
A number of recommendations have implications for organizational structures and processes.
Recommendation 82 in the report suggests that "the City establish organizational structures and
resources for access, equity and human rights:
(a) to provide policy development;
(b) to facilitate community advisory processes including committees relating to the human rights
protected groups and other Committees of Council as required;
(c) to administer anti-racism, access and equity grants;
(d) to investigate human rights issues at arms length;
(e) to implement awareness and public education programs on access, equity and human rights
issues;
(f) to act as resources for departments and agencies in developing and implementing action
plans;
(g) to liaise with community organizations regarding emerging issues and to assist them with
civic involvement;
(h) to conduct research on the needs of the human rights protected groups and to provide results
to departments to use in delivering services;
(i) to monitor legislative proposals that impact on the human rights protected groups;
(j) to implement communication strategies to increase involvement and access to services;
(k) to promote the City's position to other levels of government and external bodies; and
(l) to provide advice and research to Council Committees."
Other recommendations propose that the City:
(a) establish seven city-wide community advisory committees to address priorities faced by
human rights protected groups (Recommendation No. (1);
(b) permit community councils to establish geographically based access, equity and human
rights working groups (Recommendation No. (2);
(c) establish an Office of Aboriginal Affairs (Recommendation No. (11);
(d) establish an Office of Disability Issues (Recommendation No. (13); and
(e) establish a Human Rights Office (Recommendation No.(57).
Discussion:
Current Resources for Access and Equity:
(a) Corporate Resources:
Prior to amalgamation, the former municipalities applied corporate resources to access and
equity activities in different ways. The former Metro had dedicated staff in a corporate
Access and Equity Centre. The former City of Toronto employed dedicated staff in its Equal
Opportunity Program. Although the titles and precise job descriptions varied, the former
North York, Scarborough and Etobicoke each had a full or part-time dedicated coordinator
of race relations. Other staff, whose primary functions were not in the area of access and
equity, may have provided support to access and equity activities, for example, in supporting
the work of an advisory committee or by having employment equity and human rights
responsibilities incorporated into their overall position.
Because of the varied organizational approaches in the former municipalities to the provision
of access and equity services, achieving an accurate count of dedicated access and equity
resources at the time of amalgamation was difficult. However, based on the description of
staff's primary functions, it is calculated that, at the time of amalgamation, there were
36 positions whose primary purpose was the performance of corporate access, equity and
human rights functions. They comprised the pool of corporate access and equity staff
resources.
During 1998, a number of these positions were redeployed. Five professional staff and two
administrative support staff were assigned to the Staffing, Workforce Transition, Equity and
Human Rights Unit in the Human Resources Division to provide specialized employment
equity and human rights services.
A further four professional staff were assigned to work as Human Resource Consultants in
business units within the Human Resources Division that provide dedicated support to
specific departments. These staff are able to add specialized knowledge and expertise in the
area of access, equity and human rights to the business units. In addition, two administrative
support staff were also redeployed from the original pool of access and equity staff to work
in business units in Human Resources.
The remaining staff in the original access and equity pool were assigned to work in an
interim corporate Access and Equity Unit which was also located in the Human Resources
Division. During the past year 1.7 FTE positions have been deleted from this unit through
attrition. The corporate Access and Equity Unit provides programs to address barriers faced
by all human rights protected groups, and to assist departments in delivering programs which
eliminate these barriers. It provides corporate coordination of Council's anti-discrimination
policies and programs and implements awareness regarding these. The unit conducts policy
development and research programs in support of the elimination of barriers faced by human
rights protected groups. The unit also provides support to various advisory committees and
staff working groups.
Two of the staff in the unit are dedicated to Aboriginal affairs and effectively perform the
functions of an Aboriginal Affairs Office as contemplated in recommendation 11 in the Task
Force's draft final report. Another staff person carries a disabilities issues portfolio, which
includes the responsibilities envisaged in recommendation 13 in the draft final report. Other
staff also carry portfolios including immigrant and refugee issues, gay and lesbian issues and
issues regarding the status of women.
In 1999, the approved budget for the corporate Access and Equity Unit includes total net
expenditures of $1.471 million ($1.501 million total gross expenditures). The approved
staffing complement is 21.3 positions.
(b) Departmental Resources:
The work of the corporate access and equity staff is bolstered by staff in operating
departments who are performing access and equity functions in the course of departmental
delivery of programs and services. Some examples follow.
The Department of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism has a number of full-time
positions dedicated to providing integrated recreational programs and services. The
department estimates that approximately four full-time equivalents spread over seven
positions currently are developing and coordinating adapted and integrated recreational
services. Three of the positions (two in the West District and one in the North District) are
full-time. Their core functions are:
(i) to provide required supports and/or adapt recreational programs to integrate persons
with special needs or develop specialized programs where appropriate;
(ii) to arrange for the supports required by individuals;
(iii) to undertake special projects to increase access; and
(iv) to train staff and volunteers.
The full-time staff are also able to act as access and equity resources and advocates - for example,
reviewing and advising on program and facility design, consulting and liaising with the community
and agencies, mediating conflicts and potential human rights disputes, providing training and
organizing and hosting special events which showcase and promote integration and participation.
Additional program staff are hired as needed to provide the supports required to integrate persons
with disabilities into recreational programs and to work in specialized programs.
In the Finance department, part of the job function of the Manager of Client and Support Services
in the Purchasing and Materials Management Division is to provide administrative, training and
outreach support to the division and its clients with respect to access issues.
The Urban Planning and Development Services Department employs an Accessibility Planner. This
position assesses proposals for consistency with legislation, by-laws and City policies with respect
to accessibility for elderly and disabled persons. The position has also served as a resource to other
departments through the coordination of interdepartmental working groups and provision of advice.
With the exception of its Public Health Division, the Community and Neighbourhood Services
Department does not identify staff positions dedicated solely to access and equity work. Rather,
access and equity are integrated into all considerations and delivery of services by the department.
This is reflected in the criteria for the community grants programs for which the department is
responsible, the operating policies, publications, training and consultation initiatives undertaken by
the various divisions. The department's five Community Development Officers work closely with
community groups and agencies to develop community capacity and accessible human services.
Equal access is a general standard in the "Mandatory Services Guideline" pursuant to Section 7 of
the Health Promotion and Protection Act. This standard requires Boards of Health to reduce barriers
to accessing mandatory public health programs. The Board of Health is also required to integrate
equal access strategies into all programs. There are approximately 2.5 full time equivalent
specialized staff positions to support program staff in this regard.
Resource Implications of the Task Force Draft Recommendations:
In the course of preparing this report, staff requested each department to comment on the
implications of any of the Task Force's recommendations that were relevant to them. All
departments provided detailed feedback. This material is being provided to the Task Force to assist
it in completing its final report.
The comments from departments indicate general support for the overall direction in which the Task
Force wants the City to move. The departmental comments reveal that some of what is
recommended in the Task Force's Draft Final Report is already underway. The Task Force
recommendations in these instances serve to reinforce the importance of the initiatives or to ensure
their continuation.
The departments' feedback also suggests, however, that implementation of recommendations, if they
are adopted by Council, will have to be moderated by the availability of resources. The package of
recommendations contained in the draft final report cannot be implemented immediately within
current resource constraints.
The Task Force's draft final report includes various recommendations to undertake policy reviews
and also to make specific program changes. Departments have pointed out that implementation
would have to be phased in over time. The recommended initiatives can be built into departments'
multi-year business plans to form part of a longer term work program.
Administrative Organization for Access and Equity Functions:
The extent to which the City moves successfully and willingly in the direction proposed by the Task
Force will be influenced by how well equipped administratively the City is to perform access and
equity functions. Simply creating a specific structure to deal with each topic area covered in the
Task Force report is not the way to proceed. It is essential that the administrative organization for
access and equity be approached thoughtfully and from first principles. Why should the City be
interested in access and equity in the first place? Resources are scarce and there is competition
among priorities. The organization of access and equity functions needs to make wise use of these
scarce resources.
In reviewing the work of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity, it is important to begin
by establishing broad principles and guidelines, which should influence the City's organization
structures for delivering access and equity services. These principles and guidelines are drawn from
two main sources - the work of the Task Force itself, and what others in the field are doing (the
so-called "best practices").
General Principles and Guidelines Contained in the Task Force Report:
Throughout its consultation process, the Task Force heard that municipal government has access and
equity responsibilities in four areas:
(i) as an employer;
(ii) as a provider of services and programs;
(iii) as a purchaser of goods and services; and
(iv) as a grant giving agency.
In addition, based on an assessment of the information contained in the Task Force's Draft Report,
the City government has a further responsibility:
(i) as a civic leader in the area of community access and equity.
Each of these above-noted areas of municipal responsibility has a number of guiding principles as
outlined below.
(1) The City as Employer:
The Task Force's Draft Report sets out the following policy principle:
"The diverse population of the City of Toronto shall be reflected and
represented throughout every level of the municipal workforce, including its
Agencies, Boards, Commissions and Special Purpose Bodies.
"The dignity, worth and contribution of each person shall be respected in an
equitable municipal work environment."(2)
This overall policy principle translates into the following guidelines:
(i) being a "good" employer with fair and consistent work practices;
(ii) being a model employer for others to learn from; and
(iii) being a leader by setting an example of excellence in the workplace in terms of
access and equity practices.
(2) The City as Provider of Services and Programs:
The policy principle proposed by the Task Force is:
"All residents shall be entitled to municipal services and programs which are
racially sensitive, culturally and linguistically appropriate, gender
appropriate, accommodate disability, and are adequately resourced to ensure
equitable access and outcomes."(3)
This overall policy principle translates into the following guidelines:
(i) services and programs that are accessible;
(ii) services and programs that are sensitive; and
(iii) services and programs that meet identified needs.
(3) The City as Purchaser of Goods and Services:
The policy principle outlined in the Draft Report is:
"The municipality shall ensure equitable access and allocation to providers
of goods and services; ensure that organizations which supply goods and
services to the municipality through contractual agreements implement and
maintain employment equity; and adopt anti-discrimination and
anti-harassment practices."(4)
This overall policy principle translates into the following guidelines:
(i) contracts are open to all to bid;
(ii) there should be outreach to businesses owned and operated by members of human
rights protected groups;
(iii) purchasing policies should address the issues of diversity and equity; and
(iv) size of contracts should be established which enable small businesses to compete.
(4) The City as Grant Giving Body:
The policy principle set out by the Task Force requires that:
"The municipality shall ensure that its financing and grants are equitably
allocated to reflect the changing and differential needs of all sectors of the
community in order to achieve equitable outcomes."(5)
This overall policy principle translates into the following guidelines:
(i) grant applications should include the City's anti-racism, access and equity policy as
part of the evaluation process;
(ii) grants should reflect the demographics of the City; and
(iii) grants should be designed to encourage access and equity groups to apply and be
eligible.
(5) The City as Civic Leader:
In 1998, Council adopted the declaration "Diversity our Strength" as the City's motto. The
motto represents a fundamental value held by Council that has to permeate the entire
organization. The City is faced with the task of making the motto real. How do we live up
to our motto?
A commitment to the value of strength in diversity requires the municipal government to
look outward to the community. This emphasizes the responsibility of the government to
exercise civic leadership by facilitating and strengthening community capacity and civil
society.
This responsibility is explicitly recognized by the Task Force on Community Access and
Equity's discussion of principles. The Draft Report states:
"The municipality, in concerning itself with the social well-being of all its
residents, shall assert a proactive role in responding to community issues,
influencing public opinion and pursuing broad-based efforts in partnership
with the community and other institutional sectors to address diversity
issues."(6)
"The municipality shall support community-based voluntary organizations
to make sure that all sectors of Toronto's diverse communities are able to
effectively participate in and influence the decisions that affect their lives."(7)
This overall policy principle translates into the following guidelines:
(i) community development to be a window into the City of Toronto and out to the
community;
(ii) advocacy initiatives;
(iii) education on diversity and community access and equity - what it means and how it
works; and
(iv) partnerships wherever possible to take advantage of the skills and experience in the
community.
From Policy Principles to Organizational Effectiveness:
The policy principles and guidelines contained in the Task Force's Draft Report provide a
framework of values and corporate goals. The challenge for Toronto's municipal government lies
in incorporating the idea of strength in diversity and a commitment to community access and equity
as core values in all of its functions and activities.
The expression of core values and the achievement of goals lie in outcomes defined by the policy
principles and guidelines described above. The principles and guidelines should be seamless and
integrated into the City's operations, not isolated or marginalized. They should help to shape:
(i) the implementation of corporate and departmental policies;
(ii) the design of programs and services; and
(iii) the manner in which programs and services are delivered.
The way in which access and equity guidelines are built into the City's organizational structure will
influence how this happens.
The Experience of Others in Organizational Best Practices:
All of the former municipalities that are now part of the City of Toronto were committed to access
and equity. The Toronto Transition Team commended the former municipalities for their leadership
in the provision of access and equity services.(8) The amalgamated City of Toronto can build on this
legacy. It can also learn from the experiences in other jurisdictions.
As part of the background research for the Task Force, staff in the City's interim Access and Equity
Unit compiled information on the organizational approaches to access and equity taken by
jurisdictions in the United States and Great Britain.(9) A review of this material reveals the following
reasons for municipal governments to provide explicit access and equity services:
(i) enhancing local democracy and accountability;
(ii) enhancing customer satisfaction;
(iii) understanding customers' needs;
(iv) using people's talents to the full;
(v) becoming an "employer of choice";
(vi) enhancing partnership with the private sector;
(vii) enhancing the relationship with other levels of government; and
(viii) avoiding the costs of discrimination.
In addition, in a study of 41 municipalities, the Commission for Racial Equality in Britain identified
the following six essential organizational conditions for effective implementation of equity policies
within municipal government:
(a) Commitment: - Both councillors and senior managers must bring the strongest commitment
to equity, a commitment that goes beyond the generalities of policy statements on "core
values" to set specific, measurable and timetabled equity objectives.
(b) Corporate advice and guidance: - Specialist advice and guidance should be provided from
the centre.
(c) Resources: - All departments should get the resources they need to frame effective action
plans.
(d) Delegation: - Managers should have the power to decide on the steps they need to take to
achieve their targets.
(e) Equity objectives at all levels: - The achievement of equity objectives should be integral to
the service or business plans of all departments, and to all service agreements and contracts
with the private sector and other bodies.
(f) Effective monitoring: - All key areas of municipal practice should be monitored at both
corporate and departmental levels, using accurate and reliable systems, and according to clear
definitions of responsibility.
A Framework for Organizing Access and Equity Functions in the City of Toronto:
When the general policy principles and lessons from other jurisdictions are taken into account, three
functional areas, each with a discrete set of activities, need to be incorporated into Toronto's
administrative organization. The three areas of activity are:
(1) Departmental Activities:
This means that each department should:
(a) take responsibility for integrating access and equity core values, objectives and
policies into their normal business activities;
(b) commit resources and develop explicit action plans to meet access and equity
objectives; and
(c) be held accountable for integrating core values and corporate policies on diversity
and equity into their services to the public and their practices as employers and
purchasers and users of services.
(2) Corporate Support Functions:
Corporate resources must be available to support departments in their implementation of
access and equity policies, programs and practices. This means:
(a) setting the corporate policies and standards for the City's access and equity activities;
(b) providing a focal point for internal advocacy for access and equity issues within the
municipal government, including building awareness within the corporation of what
access and equity means and how it is practised;
(c) undertaking specialized research and policy development;
(d) providing advice, education and training support;
(e) providing a window through which to maintain a connection to the state of access
and equity in the community; and
(f) ensuring the availability of specialized supports in the areas of employment equity,
human rights standards and investigations and corporate training around diversity
and access and equity issues.
(3) Monitoring Functions:
This means:
(a) having in place objective mechanisms to monitor and evaluate how well the
municipal government is meeting access and equity goals and objectives;
(b) monitoring and assessing the relevance of corporate activities to the state of diversity
and equity in the community; and
(c) having appropriate checks and balances in place by ensuring that the monitoring
function is objective and independent of both departments and providers of corporate
support functions.
The foregoing three sets of activities were in place to varying degrees in the former municipalities.
Organizational Design Principles:
The following basic organizational design principles can be used to guide consideration of
organizational forms to accommodate departmental, corporate support and monitoring functions with
respect to the City's access and equity activities:
(1) Accountability:
(i) applies corporately and within departments;
(ii) must be strong and visible to the public;
(iii) must be based on agreed upon performance measures; and
(iv) monitoring and evaluation must be undertaken by an objective third party.
(2) Expertise:
(i) staff must be experienced in the provision of access and equity functions; and
(ii) the organization must be able to explain access and equity clearly.
(3) Consistency:
(i) this is related to how the public receives services across departments and in the City's
different service districts.
(4) Accessibility:
(i) in terms of physical accessibility to the City's programs and services;
(ii) in terms of the absence of cultural and linguistic barriers to programs and services;
and
(iii) geographical accessibility as issues often relate to cultural communities of interest.
(5) Building on existing networks:
(i) build on partnerships with existing community organizations and groups representing
community access and equity interests.
(6) Profile:
(i) community access and equity must be visible within the Council and the civic public
service;
(ii) profile is required to demonstrate the importance and priority of access and equity;
and
(iii) profile is required to demonstrate to the community the value placed by the City on
community access and equity.
(7) Broad direction setting:
(i) any corporate support functions should be responsible for establishing policies and
directions and not for operationalizing them; and
(ii) corporate support staff are not service providers but facilitators to those with direct
service responsibility.
(8) Recognizing fiscal realities:
(i) staffing levels must be accommodated within available resources and take budget
reductions into account; and
(ii) must use the scarce and skilled resources of access and equity staff effectively.
These organizational design principles are consistent with the above-noted essential organizational
conditions for effective implementation of access and equity policies that were identified by the
Commission for Racial Equality in Britain.
Organizational Structures for the City's Access and Equity Functions:
Structure for Departmental Functions:
In June 1998, the Task Force interviewed the commissioners and senior managers in each of the
City's six departments about the role of access and equity. A review of the notes from these
meetings shows that the commissioners' consistent advice to the Task Force was that access and
equity must be grounded organizationally:
"…within program operations and service delivery levels for it to be meaningful. This
is key in gaining ownership of these issues. Access and equity should rest with line
departments which should play an active role in setting realistic performance
measures."(10)
"Access and Equity has to be part of the fabric of the way we do business. It has to
be part of everyone's job in terms of how we treat staff and how we provide
services."(11)
Locating responsibility for access and equity in departments means that departments must ensure
that access and equity values and goals are part and parcel of the services they provide.
Departmental responsibility for access and equity entails:
(i) developing explicit access and equity action plans;
(ii) being a good employer;
(iii) providing accessible services; and
(iv) holding staff accountable for the effective delivery of access and equity services.
Exercising these responsibilities successfully requires:
(i) staff to possess specific skills and knowledge in the area of access and equity; and
(ii) departmental resources and programs dedicated to access and equity initiatives.
In an ideal, stable and mature organization, in which access and equity core values have been
internalized successfully into day-to-day operations, departmental and program staff would all
possess the necessary skills and knowledge to meet access and equity objectives.
In reality, organizationally, the City of Toronto is in the midst of a period of major change.
Amalgamation, service harmonization, the accommodation of Provincial downloading of service and
financial responsibilities, the process of staffing up new administrative structures and the many other
changes that accompany the transition from seven municipal administrations to one have presented
departments with many competing challenges and priorities.
In such an environment, it is possible for access and equity objectives to fall between the cracks of
change. Therefore, to ensure that access and equity policies are practised, a dedicated corporate
access and equity staff resource should be assigned to work with each department. These staff will:
(i) provide general information and assistance to other staff within the department;
(ii) serve as a link to other corporate access and equity resources; and
(iii) help coordinate the preparation of access and equity action plans within the department.
Full-time, dedicated specialists should staff these positions. They will be drawn from the pool of
21.3 corporate access and equity funded equivalent positions that were approved in the 1999
Operating Budget. These resources should not be used by departments to replace other departmental
staff who may be performing access and equity functions. Rather, their role as an internal advocate
within the respective department to which they are assigned should be to focus the department on
access and equity issues and objectives, coordinate access and equity activities across the department
and facilitate linkages to other supports.
While the general nature of the support provided to departments by these staff should be consistent,
the specific needs and capacity of each department are unique. Therefore it is recommended that the
corporate Access and Equity Unit work with each commissioner to define the functions and
reporting relationships for the assignment of dedicated corporate access and equity staff resources
to meet the needs of individual departments.
Structure for Corporate Support Functions:
While the commissioners are consistent in their view that access and equity must be grounded in the
departments and their own operations, they also agree on the need for corporate access and equity
activities.
"Corporate functions can enable departments to understand and move ahead by
providing supportive services such as training, human rights management, policy
support [and] links to the community. There has to be a group within the
organization charged with making sure awareness and action are taking place in all
departments…The corporate function should be to build linkages to make things
happen with departments, communities and Council. It should enhance the expertise
and be a catalyst and have the time and resources to dedicate to this. In an ideal
world, the corporate function should not be needed at all; however, it is a transitional
requirement to ensure we adapt appropriately to the many changes within our
community."(12)
There are two general types of corporate support functions: those that relate to the corporation's
responsibilities as an employer; and those that provide policy, research and linkages to community
issues, and a coordinating role within the City in terms of initiatives in the area of access and equity.
Structure for Corporate Employment Equity and Human Rights Support:
The corporation's Human Resources Division in the Corporate Services Department provides
support to all departments through the development of human resource hiring and management
policies and practices, assistance with the recruitment process and assistance with conflict resolution.
It is appropriate that access and equity objectives and values should be integrated fully into the
activities of this division.
Management of employment equity and human rights enquiries and investigations are currently
incorporated into the mandate of the Staffing, Workforce Transition, Equity and Human Rights unit
within the Human Resources Division. Two employment equity specialists, three human rights
specialists and two program administrative assistants are located in the unit to perform these
functions.
The focus of these positions is internal to the activities of the corporation as an employer. They are
appropriately located. Human rights, as they are defined in the legislation go beyond access and
equity to include all manner of activities relative to workplace employment. The location of
employment equity and human rights specialists within the staffing unit is also consistent with the
principle of having departments take responsibility for access and equity. Their location is designed
to ensure that the unit focuses on these issues in its provision of support to the departments.
In addition, as noted earlier in this report, in 1998 four professional staff and two program
administrative assistants were reassigned from the original pool of corporate access and equity staff
resources to add an employment equity and human rights focus to the human resources business
units. In order to ensure that the value of the assignment of these staff positions is maintained, it is
recommended that the staff positions that were reassigned from the original pool of corporate access
and equity staff resources to the human resources business units in 1998 be explicitly defined and
function as employment equity and human rights consultants. It is further recommended that the
Executive Director of Human Resources report to the Administration Committee on how the
expertise and skills of these employment equity and human rights consultants are being used to
enhance the activities of the human resources business units.
There are two potential weaknesses with the current organization for human rights enquiries and
investigations. While the function's present location is satisfactory from an administrative point of
view, there is concern that it is buried within a broader range of activities and therefore lacks profile.
This could limit employees' and managers' use of the specialists. The second concern is that people
need to feel that it is safe to approach the human rights specialists for information, advice, conflict
resolution or to lodge a formal complaint. For this to happen, the human rights specialists must be
able and perceived to provide unbiased advice and conduct independent and objective investigations.
To address these issues, a Human Rights Office will be created comprised of the existing human
rights specialists and a program administrative assistant. The office will be identified as a distinct
unit in all corporate directories. For administrative purposes, the office will continue to report to the
Manager of Staffing, Workforce Transition, Equity and Human Rights. However the sole focus of
the office will be on human rights. The staff will provide advice, respond to enquiries and conduct
investigations. The Human Rights Office will monitor the incidence of complaints against the
corporation. This activity will include monitoring complaints lodged externally with the Ontario
Human Rights Commission. As part of their management of the human rights file, staff in the
Human Rights Office must have the competence to develop corporate human rights policies. They
will work closely with the corporate Access and Equity Unit on the development of corporate human
rights policies. They will also work closely with employment equity and human rights consultants
in the human resources business units and with dedicated access and equity specialists assigned to
work with individual departments.
Reports on human rights investigations will be sent directly to the Chief Administrative Officer as
well as to the relevant commissioner to ensure that the highest priority is attached to acting upon the
findings.
Structure for a Corporate Access and Equity Office:
There is agreement by the Task Force and the Commissioners that a corporate access and equity
function is necessary at this stage in the evolution of the corporation and the City. As already
described, the function would provide specialist advice and guidance to departments, conduct
specialized research and policy development, be an advocate within the corporation and present a
corporate window to the community.
One organizational option would be to locate the corporate access and equity function within an
operating department for administrative purposes. For example, the social development mandate and
activities of the Community and Neighbourhood Services Department converge somewhat with
corporate access and equity objectives and functions.
However, housing these support functions in an operating department would give the appearance of
ownership of the functions by one particular department. There needs to be a much more visible
demonstration of corporate commitment consistent with the conclusions drawn from the experience
in other jurisdictions. The function provides a corporate resource and therefore must be located in
a corporate department.
Three options were considered:
(i) creating an arms length organization;
(ii) locating the function in the Corporate Services Department; or
(iii) locating it in the Chief Administrator's Office.
An Arms Length Access and Equity Office:
This approach runs the risk of separating the function from its importance relative to the civic
administration. The corporate access and equity function must be firmly entrenched in the
corporation to achieve staff buy-in at all levels. A separate, arms length function flies in the face of
lessons learned from best practices in other jurisdictions. The Commission for Racial Equality in
Britain concluded that specialist advice and guidance must come from the very centre of the
organization.
In addition, in performing its role as a civic leader, there is value in the City being directly involved
in the provision of access and equity services.
Locating an Access and Equity Office in the Corporate Services Department:
The current, interim Access and Equity Unit is housed in the Human Resources Division of the
Corporate Services Department. A rationale for this approach is that access and equity affects the
workforce. The Human Resources Division is already providing an employment and training
function. There is a link to the Chief Administrative Officer because the Executive Director of
Human Resources and Amalgamation reports directly to the Chief Administrative Officer on human
resource matters.
The main disadvantage of the current location is that the emphasis in the host division is on
employment. Therefore, there is the risk that the purpose of the function will come to be seen
primarily in terms of employment equity. Thus key responsibilities, including community outreach
and liaison, civic leadership and community education and the focus on access and equity issues in
general may receive less profile or attention.
In addition, the organization is undergoing a major transformation and is in the midst of staffing up
departments. In such an environment, it is difficult for the Human Resources Division to afford the
access and equity function the priority, profile and attention it requires.
This problem would not be overcome even if the function reported directly to the Commissioner of
Corporate Services. The Commissioner, too, has a fairly broad set of responsibilities with many
competing priorities and interests. These are accentuated by the amalgamation process as it relates
to staffing, facilities and technology for the new City, without adding another direct reporting
relationship.
Finally, maintaining the corporate access and equity function in the Corporate Services Department
serves to bury the importance of the function. The profile of the function, its support of a core
corporate value, its orientation both internally to the activities of the corporation and externally to
the community and its embodiment of the City's motto will all be enhanced if the function is located
in the Chief Administrator's Office.
Locating an Access and Equity Office in the Chief Administrator's Office:
Consideration was given to creating a stand alone Access and Equity Office that reports directly to
the Chief Administrative Officer. The disadvantage of this approach is the difficulty gaining the
time and attention required to direct this critical corporate function. The Chief Administrative
Officer has responsibility for overseeing the work of six commissioners responsible for large
departments and has little available time to manage a small organizational function like access and
equity.
The preferred option is to locate the function within an existing division in the Chief Administrator's
Office. The appropriate location is the Strategic and Corporate Policy Division. The advantages of
placing the function in this division are:
(i) it meets the Task Force's expectation that the function should be in a high profile location;
(ii) it complements and can support other functions, skill sets and responsibilities of the division;
and
(iii) it begins to make access and equity a truly corporate initiative by positioning it as a strategic
resource to departments, Council and the community.
The Strategic and Corporate Policy Division currently houses the corporate policy function and the
Healthy City Office. The corporate access and equity function fits well into the overall mandate of
the division. The division:
(a) comprises highly skilled and conceptual thinkers in their respective areas of expertise;
(b) exists as a resource to the corporation by providing:
(i) overall policy coordination corporately; and
(ii) assisting departments in the provision of programs and services that are the best they
can be;
(c) is a point of access for other governments; it is a window into and out of the corporation;
(d) deals with high profile, sensitive issues that involve diverse, sometimes conflicting interests
and sets precedents by its recommendations;
(e) articulates and disseminates overall corporate strategies and core corporate values; and
(f) sets corporate directions.
The access and equity and Healthy City Office functions overlap with respect to community outreach
and community capacity building activities. The access and equity and corporate policy functions
overlap, too. These overlaps present opportunities within the division for capacity building, cross
training, and reinforcement of corporate initiatives, corporate coordination and corporate policy
development.
The result will be a Strategic and Corporate Policy Division with a strengthened corporate focus that
will have an impact on how Council sets priorities and strategic directions for the corporation, and
sets the framework of values and practices against which the city government wants to be viewed
and judged. The placement of access and equity within this division will clearly establish these
functions as part of the City's core values.
Organizing the Access and Equity Function within the Strategic and Corporate Policy Division:
Given the functional overlaps and the potential for rationalization, consideration was given to
thoroughly integrating the access and equity function into the rest of the Strategic and Corporate
Policy Division. Consideration was also paid to merging the Healthy City Office and current interim
Access and Equity Unit to create a new unit within the division.
Rationalization of functions along one or other of those lines may be appropriate when the
corporation is more stable and mature. At present it is important to retain an identifiable and focused
set of access and equity functions and an identifiable set of healthy city functions and corporate
policy functions. Therefore an Access and Equity Unit will be created within the Strategic and
Corporate Policy Division. This unit will report to the Director of Strategic and Corporate Policy,
who in turn will be accountable for its performance to the Chief Administrative Officer.
The Access and Equity Unit will replace the interim Access and Equity Unit in the Corporate
Services Department. It will be responsible for:
(i) specialized advice, guidance and support to the Chief Administrative Officer, Council and
departments;
(ii) specialized research and policy development;
(iii) monitoring legislative proposals that impact on human rights protected groups;
(iv) internal advocacy for access and equity objectives and policies;
(v) coordination of City-wide access and equity information;
(vi) Aboriginal affairs;
(vii) coordination of portfolios related to equity seeking groups;
(viii) community liaison, outreach and development;
(ix) implementation of awareness and public education programs on access, equity and human
rights issues;
(x) coordination of support to community advisory committees on access and equity; and
(xi) administration of specialized access and equity grants.
In adopting the 1999 Operating Budget, Council approved an appropriation of $1,501,000.00 total
gross expenditures ($1,471,000.00 total net expenditures) and 21.3 equivalent funded staff positions
for the Access and Equity Unit. It is recommended that this appropriation and the positions be
transferred from the Human Resources Division in the Corporate Services Department to the
Strategic and Corporate Policy Division in the Chief Administrator's Office to facilitate the transfer
of program management and administration of the corporate Access and Equity unit from the
Corporate Services Department to the Chief Administrator's Office, and the 1999 Operating Budget
be adjusted accordingly.
Structure for Monitoring Functions:
When they were interviewed by Task Force members in June 1998, the commissioners indicated that
departments had to be held accountable for delivering their access and equity commitments.
However, they did not believe that it should be the role of the corporate access and equity function
to evaluate their performance. There needs to be a more level playing field where one part of the
organization does not sit in judgement over the other. The corporate access and equity unit is an
enabler, supporter and expert in the field. A policing function would compromise its role as a
facilitator.
To ensure that departments are held accountable and to ensure that there is objective assessment of
the corporation's performance in the area of access and equity, monitoring and evaluation will occur
at three levels:
(a) Annual Performance Reviews:
Departments will demonstrate how they are meeting their commitments and implementing
their access and equity action plans through the regular cycle of annual performance reviews.
A template has been developed for departments to use in preparing their multi-year business
plans. Access and equity considerations have been incorporated into the template. Thus
program areas will have to describe explicitly:
(i) how they will integrate access and equity objectives and policies into normal
business activities;
(ii) what resources have been committed and action plans developed to meet access and
equity objectives; and
(iii) how access and equity objectives will be reflected in staff composition, training and
development.
Within the Corporate Management Framework, which Council approved in 1998(13),
multi-year business plans form the basis for annual program budgets and performance
reviews. The foundation for the Corporate Management Framework is the City's Strategic
Plan, which is currently being developed. Access and equity goals and objectives should be
incorporated into the Strategic Plan.
(b) Internal Audit:
Although it is not reflected in the Task Force's list of draft recommendations, the Task
Force's draft final report proposes that, "for each term of Council (every 3 years), an external
access, equity and human rights evaluation/audit will be conducted on the City's progress
in achieving its goals."(14)
It is appropriate to conduct the type of focused audit proposed by the Task Force. However,
such an audit falls within the mandate and competence of the City Auditor and need not be
managed by an external party. The City Auditor is independent of the programs, activities
and parties that would be subject to the proposed audit.
Therefore, it is recommended that, once in each term of Council, the City Auditor oversee
an internal audit of the performance by the corporation as a whole. The purpose the audit
will be to monitor the City's overall achievement in meeting its access and equity goals.
(c) Annual Community Consultation:
Part of the intent of the Task Force's proposal that there be an externally conducted audit is
to ensure that there is a community perspective in the evaluation of the City's access and
equity efforts. In order to receive an external community perspective on the progress being
made by the City and its relevance to issues in the community, it would be appropriate to
convene an annual consultation with a report card that would provide input to planning,
policy and program development in subsequent years. It is recommended that the City
convene such an annual community consultation on access, equity and human rights issues.
This process could form part of a more general initiative to report on the State of the City.
It could also contribute to the purpose of the biannual joint meetings of community advisory
committees contemplated in recommendation 76 in the Task Force's draft final report.(15)
Conclusions:
The organizational approach described in this report is based on the premise that the City wants to
embrace access and equity as cornerstones of its activities and relationship with the community. The
administrative structures and accountability processes have been designed to accommodate the
aspirations of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity. The Task Force's draft report sets
out a direction for Council to follow. Movement in that direction will be quicker in some years,
slower in others, depending on Council's relative priorities and the resource constraints of the day.
It is recommended that the Task Force on Community Access and Equity be requested to take this
report into consideration during the preparation of its final report to Council.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following report (May 27,
1999) from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair, Task Force on Community Access and Equity
entitled "Final Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity":
On January 29, 1999, the Task Force on Community Access and Equity tabled its Draft Report at
the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee with a request for the Chief Administrative Officer
to bring forward a report regarding administrative options for implementing the proposed Action
Plan. The Draft Report was widely circulated for comment and input and the Action Plan and
Recommendations have been finalized and are attached.
Members of the Task Force have reviewed the Chief Administrative Officer's report (May 19,1999)
regarding the resources and organizational placement of access and equity functions. Task Force
members offer the following recommendations:
(1) that Recommendation No. (4) in the Report (May 19, 1999) from the Chief Administrative
Officer be amended by deleting the word "internal"; and
that the Report of the Chief Administrative Officer be adopted as amended.
(2) that the Action Plan and Final Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Access
and Equity be approved as the policy and program framework for implementing access and
equity.
The Task Force also wishes to advise that it has established an implementation sub-committee which
will continue its work until December 31, 1999, by which time the new advisory committees and
working groups will be in place.
City of Toronto
Task Force on Community Access and Equity
Action Plan and Final Recommendations
May, 1999.
Community Advisory Committees:
(1) that City Council establish seven City-wide access, equity and human rights community
advisory committees to address the priorities faced by the human rights protected groups:
(a) Aboriginal Affairs Committee;
(b) Disability Issues Committee;
(c) Status of Women Committee;
(d) Racial Minorities Committee;
(e) Ethnocultural and Faith Issues Committee;
(f) Immigrant and Refugee Issues Committee; and
(g) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Issues.
(2) that Community Councils establish working groups on access, equity and human rights
issues as needs currently exist or arise and permit membership on these working groups to
include individuals who work or reside in the City;
(3) that the community advisory committees advise City Council, its agencies, boards and
commissions, and advocate to external bodies on removing barriers that restrict human rights
protected groups from participating in public life and achieving social, cultural, economic
and political well-being;
(4) that the community advisory committees include: individuals; individuals who work in
community agencies serving the human rights protected groups; individuals with technical
expertise; and, that the membership represent all regions of the City, and reflect the diversity
of the City's population;
(5) that the community advisory committees on access, equity and human rights report to
Council through the appropriate Standing Committees on issues within the mandate of the
Standing Committees and to the Policy and Finance Committee for issues which are strategic
in nature;
(6) that a publicly advertised process with a nominating committee be used to select the
members of the community advisory committees and working groups on access, equity and
human rights outlined in Appendix A;
(7) that City Council appoint at least 2 Members of Council to serve on each of the above named
community advisory committees on access, equity and human-rights;
(8) that City Council appoint a Member of Council as a special advocate on disability issues; and
(9) that the City provide sensitivity and awareness training and materials on access, equity and
human rights issues to all persons involved with the municipal structure, including elected
officials, emergency services personnel, staff, contractors and persons appointed to city
committees.
Aboriginal Self-Determination:
(10) that City Council endorse the principle of Aboriginal self-determination and work with
Aboriginal people to achieve this goal;
(11) that City Council establish an Office of Aboriginal Affairs; and
(12) that City Council establish initiatives to support the cultural, social, economic and political
participation of Aboriginal communities in Toronto's civic life.
Disability Access:
(13) That City Council establish an Office of Disability Issues;
(14) that City Council and City staff review all disability-related policies of former municipalities,
and compile best practices to remove systemic barriers in employment, goods, services and
facilities, and that City Council endorse these best practices;
(15) that City Council authorize an external review of the policies and services and establish time
lines for changing or improving the mobility and access of people with disabilities including
all forms of transportation services in the city, including:
(i) adding streetscaping amenities (e.g. ramped corners with tactile warning strips,
practical street door accesses, and enforcing clear paths on all pedestrian walkways);
(ii) installing specialized traffic signals (e.g. audio signals at which those users who
cannot cross safely during the standard cycle timing can prolong the pedestrian walk
cycle); and
(iii) improving the services provided by the TTC, Wheeltrans and increasing the number
of accessible taxicabs.
(16) that City Council establish TTY's in all departments, in public areas of City facilities and in
the community.
Advocacy and Partnership:
(17) that City Council continue to act as an advocate for the equal treatment of same-sex spouses;
(18) that City Council take steps to establish parallel pension benefits programs for same-sex
spousal families and that these remain in place until other governments remove legislative
prohibitions, and that no limits be set on retroactivity for these benefits;
(19) that work against hate activity include hate crimes and incidents motivated by racism,
sexism, antisemitism, bigotry, or homophobia;
(20) that the City request the inter-agency working group on hate activity to continue its work;
(21) that, where required, City Council and City staff should work to establish inter-agency staff
working groups to address specific problems; and
(a) that a working group be established on Language Equity and Literacy; and
(b) that the working group on Employment Equity include the City's bargaining agents
as well as community organizations.
(22) that the City vigorously implement the already approved implementation strategy arising
from the Urban Forum on Immigration and Refugee Issues;
Civic Appointments:
(23) that for the purpose of implementing Council's policy on appointments to agencies, boards,
commissions and special purpose bodies, the City will define 'citizen' to include all persons
who pay property taxes or business taxes or who live within the boundaries of the City of
Toronto including permanent residents, refugees, refugee claimants, residents without
homes;
(24) that the City use the foregoing definition of 'citizen' in making appointments to agencies,
boards, commissions and special purpose bodies, except where law requires Canadian
Citizenship for an individual to serve as a member of these bodies;
(25) that the City remove the age restriction in making appointments to agencies, boards,
commissions and special purpose bodies except where law requires an individual to attain
a particular age to serve as a member of these bodies;
(26) that City Council advocate for changes to any law which creates barriers to civic
appointments for persons who are residents or who pay property taxes or business taxes;
(27) that the Nominating Committee establish goals and timetables for increasing the diversity
among persons it recommends for civic appointments; and
(28) that City staff provide an annual report to City Council on the participation rates of the
human rights protected groups in appointments made to agencies, boards, commissions and
special purpose bodies.
Participation and Communications:
(29) that the City make resources available to facilitate members of the public in participating on
advisory committees which Council establishes and the advisory or management
committees/boards of agencies, boards, commissions and special purpose bodies, including
providing information in alternate formats, languages, attendant care, child care, and using
accessible locations;
(30) that the communications strategies for municipal elections take account of the City's
linguistic diversity and levels of literacy;
(31) that all graphic design, cultural programs and special events of the City reflect the diversity
of the City's population;
(32) that the City continue to provide awareness and public education programs which support
the principles of including all groups, respecting differences, achieving human rights, and
eliminating harassment and hate activities;
(33) that the City continue its awards and scholarship programs which recognize and contribute
to the City's objectives regarding access, equity and human rights;
(34) that the City provide space in its press gallery for the "ethnic and community" media to help
expand coverage of municipal issues;
(35) that the City maintain and enhance its multi-lingual capacity by encouraging staff to use the
multi-lingual AT&T telephone service, providing printed materials in various languages,
purchasing service agreements with community agencies, identifying and remunerating staff
with language skills, and continuing to use in-house interpreters and community liaison staff;
and
(36) that City extend guidelines regarding anti-discrimination which govern the use of Nathan
Phillips Square to all "civic squares" and that the City amend the Municipal Code
accordingly.
Services and Planning:
(37) that the City set annual targets for increasing the number of child care spaces and their hours
of operation;
(38) that the City make housing services for refugees a priority;
(39) that the Official Plan and the Social Development Strategy respond to the barriers and
specific needs identified during the consultations held by the Task Force;
(40) that the Official Plan provide for recognizing the ethno-racial and cultural heritage and needs
of the diverse communities in the City;
(41) that City Departments involve residents in program advisory committees to evaluate services
and make sure that these processes include persons who are from the City's diverse
communities;
(42) that the City continue recreation programs which are targeted to specific communities,
including lifeguard training for black youth, special hours for Muslim women, and leadership
training for youth from high-risk populations;
(43) (a) that the City review its zoning, building and fire regulations to address the barriers
faced by Aboriginal people and other communities practicing cultural and spiritual
traditions, and identify those regulations which fall under the mandate of other levels
of government, and advocate for changes as required; and
(b) that appropriate civic officials be requested to report further on these matters
including the provision of residential uses at places of worship and various burial
traditions.
(44) that City Council adopt a set of accessibility guidelines for all City-owned buildings and
other properties and that it determine accessibility gaps and implement an action plan to
address these gaps;
(45) that the City work to proactively respond to accessibility issues with architects and
developers by seeking to enhance the legislated requirements under the Ontario Building
Code and more stringently enforcing them;
(46) that the City investigate means of augmenting the city's stock of affordable accessible
housing for people with disabilities, both privately and publicly owned; and
(47) that the City modify its subsidies program to create portability which matches the need of the
tenant with the disability, rather than the unit;
Employment and Leadership:
(48) that the City adopt an employment equity policy to achieve a workforce which reflects the
population at all occupational levels of the City;
(49) that the City conduct additional workforce surveys as needed to assemble a complete data
base from which to monitor the ongoing participation of designated groups in the City's
workforce;
(50) that when the City establishes any new compensation and benefit programs for employees
it arrange for an independent "gender equity"/ "wage gap" analysis to determine the impact
of new systems on the "wage gap";
(51) that the City establish "mentoring" and "job demonstration" programs to help individuals
from groups who face barriers gain work experience, and that the City encourage and
recognize employees who act as volunteers for these programs;
(52) that the City offer specialized training programs to employees to enhance their language and
literacy skills or to facilitate entry into "non-traditional" work, paying particular attention to
employees whose first language is not English, or for whom technology and high literacy
levels have not been occupational requirements;
(53) that Council allocate sufficient resources to accommodate employees with disabilities in the
workplace so that their productivity and work experience parallels as nearly as possible that
of their peers; and
(54) that the City's Fair Wage and Labour Trades Office continue to oversee the
anti-discrimination requirement of the Workers Rights Policy and that it update the grounds
of anti-discrimination to include those covered by the Human Rights Policy.
Employee Consultation:
(55) that the City continue its employee working groups, as needed, on issues related to the
designated groups to address emerging issues, and that they liaise with the relevant
community advisory committees on an ongoing basis; and
(56) that the City encourage employees to participate in corporate and community programs to
help staff better understand the City's diverse communities;
Complaints:
(57) that the City establish a Human Rights Office to receive inquiries and investigate complaints
of discrimination regarding employment, access to services, and hate-related activities;
(58) that the organizational placement of the City's Human Rights Office facilitate arm's-length
investigations, including those relating to complaints of discrimination in employment,
service delivery and hate activity; and
(59) (a) that the Human Rights Office submit an annual report to Council on its activities; and
(b) that this Annual Report include the success rates of resolving complaints, including
those which have been filed with the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
Building Economic Capacity:
(60) that the City's Economic Development Strategy specifically outline proactive strategies that
include the City's diverse communities;
(61) that the City implement the implementation strategy arising from recommendations of the
Urban Aboriginal Economic Development Seminar and that it provide progress reports;
(62) that to promote the image of Toronto as a "global city", city-endorsed programs, such as the
Olympic Bid, The Gay Games, small business outreach, strategies be implemented to use
these as opportunities for businesses owned and operated by members of the human rights
protected groups;
(63) that the City use its purchasing process for communicating the City's leadership role on
employment equity, anti-discrimination and against harassment in the workplaces of
Toronto;
(64) that the City continue information and outreach activities, which make sure that businesses
from various communities have access to the procurement process of the City and its
agencies;
(65) that the City's purchasing process utilize strategies such as reducing the size of contracts and
sub-contracts to increase the number of businesses owned by designated groups participating
in the process and for achieving employment equity among firms seeking to do business with
the City; and
(66) (a) that City staff submit an annual report to Council on the proportion of expenditure
the City spent with businesses owned by the designated groups and that this report
include information on the employment equity policies of firms who are suppliers to
the City; and
(b) that a report be submitted to Council every 5 years, coinciding with the Census, on
the status of designated groups in supplier workforces.
Building and Supporting Community Capacity:
(67) that City Council continue to support community organizations through its various grants
programs and that it develop a strategy to facilitate the equitable distribution of grants
funding.
(68) that the City continue to provide resource support, such as meeting space, information
sessions and research information to community organizations to assist them in providing
services to their communities and to facilitate their participation in civic society;
(69) that the City require all organizations receiving City grants to demonstrate their commitment
to access and equity;
(70) that the City expand its Day Care grants program across the City;
(71) that the City expand its Breaking the Cycle of Violence (BTCV) grants program across the
City;
(72) that the Multicultural grants program maintain anti-racism and anti-hate as program criteria,
if no new funds are available in 1999; and
(73) that City Council work to establish a comprehensive access and equity grants program to
support the advocacy efforts of human rights protected groups.
Monitoring and Evaluation:
(74) that City staff modify the report template for all reports to Council to include an impact
statement on access, equity and human rights;
(75) that City staff prepare comprehensive demographic profiles of all City wards to guide policy
development, program planning and service delivery;
(76) (a) that the community advisory committees on access, equity and human rights issues
meet jointly at least twice per year to review the ongoing implementation of the
corporate action plan for access, equity and human rights and to review the annual
reports;
(b) that these joint meetings include any access, equity and human rights working groups
established by Community Councils; and
(c) that during this annual meeting, the schedule be arranged to provide for participants
to come together on a geographical as well as on an issue basis;
(77) that each Department, Agency, Board, Commission or special purpose body submit an
Access, Equity and Human Rights Action Plan to City Council;
(78) that each Department evaluate its policies, programs and services to identify barriers
experienced by the human rights protected groups and that measurement tools be prepared
for this purpose;
(79) that City Council request its Agencies, Boards, Commissions and special purpose bodies to
provide an annual report on how they implemented employment equity, community access,
service equity and human rights;
(80) that the annual employment equity report to Council on the status of the human rights
protected groups include data on its workforce as a whole and by Departments regarding
representation, occupations, promotions, compensation, training, benefits, exits, and
developmental opportunities; and
(81) that the City produce an annual consolidation of access and equity measures in a report card
format.
Organization and Resources:
(82) that the City establish organizational structures and resources for access, equity and human
rights:
(i) to provide policy development;
(ii) to facilitate community advisory processes including committees relating to the
human rights protected groups and other Committees of Council as required;
(iii) to administer anti-racism, access and equity grants;
(iv) to investigate human rights issues at arm's length;
(v) to implement awareness and public education programs on access, equity and human
rights issues;
(vi) to act as a resource for departments and agencies in developing and implementing
action plans;
(vii) to liaise with community organizations regarding emerging issues and to assist them
with civic involvement;
(viii) to conduct research on the needs of the human rights protected groups and to provide
results to departments to use in delivering services;
(ix) to monitor legislative proposals that impact on the human rights protected groups;
(x) to implement communication strategies to increase involvement and access to
services;
(xi) to promote the City's position to other levels of government and external bodies; and,
(xii) to provide advice and research to Council Committees.
(83) that Agencies, Boards and Commissions be requested to implement access, equity and
human rights policies and programs consistent with those of City Council; and
(84) that the Workers Information and Action Centre be continued as a resource for addressing
employment discrimination in the Toronto labour market and that the Small Business Centres
operated by the City ensure that information regarding employment equity and human rights
are provided to business owners.
Implementation and Follow-up:
(85) (a) that an external evaluation or Access, Equity and Human Rights Audit be conducted
by City Council every three years for each term of Council on the implementation of
Council's access, equity and human rights policies and programs";
(b) that a reference group be established to oversee the evaluation process and that this
include representatives of the community advisory committees and community
organizations, and be chaired by a Member of Council serving on one of the
community advisory committees; and
(c) that the external evaluation be conducted by individuals/firms who are recognized as
professionals with experience and expertise in the access, equity and human rights
field; and
(86) that the Chief Administrative Officer provide a status report 12 months after approval by
Council on the implementation of recommendations;
External Agencies:
(87) that the Toronto District School Board and all Boards of Education be requested to
implement comprehensive access, equity and human rights policies;
(88) that the Government of Ontario be requested to provide resources for education,
transportation, housing, etc., to improve the status of the human rights protected groups; and
(89) that the Government of Canada be encouraged to provide resources to the City, and other
agencies for settlement, education and employment certification for immigrants and refugees.
--------
Appendix A
Terms of Reference for Community Advisory Committees
Names of recommended committees:
(i) Aboriginal Affairs Committee;
(ii) Disability Issues Committee;
(iii) Status of Women Committee;
(iv) Racial Minorities Committee;
(v) Ethno-cultural and Multi-faith Issues Committee;
(vi) Immigrant and Refugee Issues Committee; and
(vii) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Issues.
Role and responsibilities:
The Community Advisory Committees shall use their knowledge and expertise to provide advice to
City Council, through the standing committees of Council, and act as a liaison with external bodies
on barriers to participation in public life and to the achievement of social, cultural and economic
well-being of the City's residents.
Each Community Advisory Committee shall also address the specific issues facing particular
communities, develop options for Council's consideration and make recommendations for positive
changes that shall improve the quality of the lives of the members of the City's diverse communities.
Process:
In providing advice to Council, the Community Advisory Committees shall consult and hold public
meetings with communities around specific issues. Meeting schedules/locations shall take into
consideration regional/geographic concerns.
Membership and Eligibility:
Each Community Advisory Committee will be composed of 18 community members and 2 Members
of Council. Members are appointed as individuals and not as representatives of organizations.
Members shall include individuals, individuals who work in community agencies serving human
rights protected groups, and individuals with technical expertise. The overall membership shall
represent all regions of the City, reflect the diversity of the given community, and at least two thirds
of the membership shall be reflective of the issues being addressed by the respective committees.
All committees shall have equal numbers of men and women, except for the status of women
committee, of which at least two thirds of its membership shall be women.
To be eligible, a member must reside or pay business or property taxes in the City of Toronto. A
position is vacated automatically if eligibility criteria are no longer met by the incumbent.
Membership selection:
City Council shall appoint members. An initial selection committee will recommend to City Council
the membership for each community advisory committee. After the first appointments, the selection
process will be turned over to each committee and shall follow the procedures outlined in this report,
unless amended by City Council.
The initial selection committee will consist of men and women representing each of the proposed
committees. Membership shall be drawn from existing municipal advisory committees, community
members of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity and individuals from community
groups who are not seeking appointment to any of the proposed advisory committees or working
groups. The selection committee will be facilitated by the Task Force Chair and supported by a staff
team from the Access and Equity Unit.
The selection of co-chairs of the community advisory committees will be made by the members of
the advisory committees.
Guidelines for Administering Selection:
An information seminar will be held for each Committee, at which attendance is mandatory for all
applicants.
A Standard application form will be used by all applicants and application forms will be distributed
at the information seminars.
Interviews will be conducted by interview teams which will include at least one member of Council
who is appointed to the Committee.
A standard list of interview questions will be used during the interview process.
The recommendations of the Interview Teams will be forwarded to the appropriate Committee and
to Council.
Each Committee will undertake an orientation session for its citizen members.
How to Find Interested Members:
A widely advertised public process shall be used, including local community-based media, groups
and organizations and information sessions, etc. to call for applications to the community advisory
committees. The following criteria used for the selection of the members of the Task Force shall
continue to be used:
(i) experience working in an advisory committee or similar setting;
(ii) leadership in the community on access, equity issues ;
(iii) history of public service such as volunteer work;
(iv) proven ability to consult within and across their sector;
(v) demonstrated commitment, knowledge and understanding of access and equity issues;
(vi) availability and willingness to attend meetings;
(vii) skills in listening, analysis and learning; and
(viii) ability to work in a team setting, including an interest and capacity to work through
consensus.
A shortlist of qualified candidates who are available for future appointment shall be maintained for
six months and contacted as vacancies arise.
Term of office:
Members shall be appointed for a three-year term and/or until a successor is appointed. The terms
of office of members will overlap to maintain continuity. In the first term, half of the members shall
be appointed for a two-year term and half shall be appointed for a three-year term.
A person appointed when a member resigns only serves the remainder of that term and is eligible
to reapply.
Individuals are eligible for membership for a maximum of two consecutive terms, i.e., six years.
Quorum:
A quorum shall be fifty percent of community members on the Advisory Committee.
Reporting relationship:
The Community Advisory Committees shall report to Council through the appropriate standing
committees on issues within the mandates of the standing committee, and to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee for issues which are strategic in nature.
Operating procedures:
The Advisory Committee shall follow the rules and procedures of Council committees.
Selection process for Access, Equity and Human Rights Working Groups established by Community
Councils:
A selection process similar to that for the community advisory committees shall be followed.
The initial selection committee will be drawn from the existing municipal advisory committees
operating at the local communities who are not seeking reappointment, another local community
group and from the Task Force on Community Access and Equity.
The size of the working groups shall be established by the Community Council.
The selection process shall be facilitated by a Member of Community Council who has served on
a municipal advisory committee regarding access and equity. The process will be supported by the
Access and Equity Unit.
Selection process for Issue-Based Working Groups:
The Issue-Based Working Groups shall be chaired by a Member of Council. Membership shall
include organizational representatives from agencies and other institutions whose mandate includes
the issues addressed by the Working Group. Expressions of interest should be sought from
interested organizations and a membership list established and reported to City Council along with
the terms of reference for the working group. The membership shall have representation from all
regions of the City and shall reflect the diversity of the City's population.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following communication
(February 23, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The York Community Council recommended that the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
be advised that it endorses in principle, the Draft Report of the Task Force on Community Access
and Equity.
Background:
The Community Council on February 17, 1999, had before it the communication (January 22, 1999)
from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair, Task Force on Community Access and Equity, to the Strategic
Policies and Priorities Committee, forwarding the Draft Report of the Task Force.
The following persons appeared before the Community Council in connection with the foregoing
matter:
- Mr. Charles Ng, member of the Task Force;
- Ms. Sonja Greckol, member of the Task Force;
- Mr. Al Reeves, member of the Task Force; and
- Ms. Rose Lee, Access and Equity Centre.
--------
(Report dated January 22, 1999, addressed to the
Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair,
Task Force on Community Access and Equity)
Purpose:
To extend the mandate of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity by three months to allow
the Chief Administrative Officer to prepare an options report on administrative structures to be
considered in the finalization of the Report.
Financial Implications:
None. Each of the former municipalities allocated resources for the implementation of programs and
services to support achieving access and equity for all human rights designated groups facing barriers
and for the participation of representatives of these groups on municipal advisory committees on
equity issues. The Chief Administrative Officer's report regarding the implementation plan for the
Final Report of the Task Force will address resource requirements.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the Chief Administrative Officer be requested to prepare a report for the end of March, if
possible, for consideration by the Task Force on Community Access and Equity and that the
report address the following:
(a) administrative options to support this Action Plan which includes community
advisory committees; an Aboriginal Affairs Office, a Disability Issues Office, a
Human Rights Office; and an Access and Equity Centre with geographic sites;
(b) an external evaluation mechanism for conducting an Access, Equity and Human
Rights Audit every 3 years for each term of Council on the implementation of
Council's policies on access, equity and human rights; and
(c) the level of resources required for the harmonization and leveling up of the access,
equity and human rights programs and policies of the former municipalities.
(2) the mandate for the Task Force on Community Access and Equity be extended by 3 months
to provide the time required by the Chief Administrative Officer to prepare the options report
outlined in Recommendation No. 1; and
(3) the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary actions to give effect
thereto.
Council Reference:
At its meeting of March 4, 5 and 6, 1998, Toronto City Council established the Task Force on
Community Access and Equity to address the ways in which the City can:
"(i) strengthen civic society and in particular empower those members of the community who
face barriers to full participation in the life of the community;
(ii) take a more effective role in addressing the barriers faced by women, people of colour,
Aboriginal people, people with disabilities, lesbians, gays, bi-sexual and transgendered,
immigrants/refugees, different religious/faith communities;
(iii) strengthen community involvement and public participation in the decision-making processes
of the municipality, particularly for equity seeking communities;
(iv) continue the City's pro-active role in linking and partnering with other institutions and
agencies, as well as with the community, in engaging in initiatives in support of access and
equity;
(v) ensure that the contributions, interests and needs of all sectors of Toronto's diverse
population are reflected in the City's mission, operation and service delivery; and
(vi) continue the City's leadership in the community as a model employer with a workforce that
reflects the diversity of its residents and which follows fair and equitable employment
practices".
Council also authorized the continuation of the existing advisory committees of the former
municipalities; the filling of vacancies using Task Force selection criteria; and the continuation of
all the access and equity policies and programs of these municipalities. Council requested the Task
Force to submit its final report in January, 1999 and to remain in place until the end of March to
advise on implementation.
Comments:
The Task Force Members were appointed in April, 1998. The Task Force has met monthly and held
a number of consultations with a wide range of community organizations at many different locations
across the City.
Many people who participated in the consultations were pleased that the Task Force consulted them
about access, equity and human rights issues, but were anxious about whether the consultations
meant that the City of Toronto was no longer committed to the previous policies and programs of
the former municipalities.
Community members stated over and over again, that despite their personal and group situations,
the strong voice with which the City has spoken on many issues has made the City a better place to
live. However, members of the community are mindful of the increase in hate motivated activities
against many of the human rights protected groups. Many members of these groups have found that
lack of recognition of non-Canadian work experience, difficulties with gaining Canadian work
experience, lack of accommodation, inadequate child care and transportation barriers continue to be
problems. During consultations, they reported that downloading is negatively affecting members
of their communities and that their organizations, faced with budgetary cuts, are unable to respond
to need.
Members of the groups have very positive feelings about the past and ongoing efforts of the City to
be an advocate to other levels of government and to respond to the diverse service needs of its
population. Community members also stressed that the assembly of people from all corners of the
world living and working in the City has created a social fabric that is the envy of many.
The Task Force also found that the feelings of "ownership" and "belonging", were fostered by the
presence of the community advisory committees established by the former municipalities, both at
the City wide and departmental levels. Through these committees, groups who face barriers were
able to give advice on policy issues to their Councils and to provide input to Departments about
specific service needs.
However, the Task Force also heard very clearly from the Aboriginal community that there is a
failure to recognize, respect or value their distinct status within society.
The Task Force also noted that there was a wide variation among the former municipalities regarding
the policies, programs, resource allocation and administrative structures with respect to access,
employment equity, service equity and human rights. In particular, the Task Force noted in its
review of reports prepared for the Toronto Transition Team that 38 of the 44 staff positions
specifically dedicated to the delivery of access, service equity, human rights and employment equity
programs were staff of either the former Metro Toronto or the former City of Toronto.
Task Force Preliminary Conclusions:
The Task Force members are beginning to conclude that:
(1) there is a continuing need for community advisory committees regarding access and equity
resulting from the barriers faced by human rights protected groups and lack of access to full
participation in all aspects of social, cultural, economic and political life;
(2) there is a continued advocacy role which City Council must play with other levels of
government, institutions and the community at large;
(3) the City can assist the Aboriginal people of Toronto who are working towards "self
determination";
(4) the City must maintain its corporate leadership role in implementing employment equity and
human rights programs, and in providing services which respect the unique needs of human
rights protected groups;
(5) the City must continue to build community capacity through grants and other resource
supports; and
(6) the pro-active stance taken by the former municipalities and the new city on these issues have
helped to foster a spirit of mutuality and trust among the people of Toronto and has
contributed to the City's reputation for its ability to embrace and nurture its diverse
communities.
Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair, Task Force on Community Access and Equity appeared before the
Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee in connection with the foregoing matter.
(A copy of the draft report dated January, 1999, from the Task Force on Community Access and
Equity entitled "Diversity Our Strength - Access and Equity Our Goal", was forwarded to all
Members of Council with the June 1, 1999, agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
and a copy thereof is also on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing
Clause, the following report (June 7, 1999) from the Chief Administrative Officer:
Purpose:
This report clarifies how recommendations by the Task Force on Community Access and Equity for
the establishment of specific Offices for Aboriginal Affairs and Disability Issues will be implemented
within the administrative organization for access and equity services in the City.
Financial Implications:
The recommendations in this report can be accommodated within existing approved financial and
staff resources.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) Council endorse the Task Force on Community Access and Equity's recommendations
nos. 11 and 13; in order to implement recommendations 11 and 13 of the Task Force on
Community Access and Equity, the City establish an Office of Aboriginal Affairs and an
Office of Disability Issues within the corporate Access and Equity Unit in the Chief
Administrator's Office; and the establishment of these two offices be accomplished within
the approved budget and staffing levels of the corporate Access and Equity Unit; and
(2) in preparing the status report requested in the Task Force's recommendation no. 86, the
CAO comment specifically on progress regarding the implementation of Offices for
Aboriginal Affairs and Disability Issues and the development of their mandates and City and
community relationships; and the appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to
take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Council Reference:
On June 1, 1999 the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee considered a report from the CAO
entitled "Resources for Access and Equity Functions". The committee also considered the final
recommendations of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity.
The CAO's report provided an approach to the organization of administrative structures for access
and equity functions in the City that can accommodate the aspirations of the Task Force within the
financial constraints of the corporation. The Task Force's recommendations nos. 11 and 13
proposed respectively that Council establish an Office of Aboriginal Affairs and an Office of
Disability Issues. The CAO's report did not explicitly endorse the creation of these special offices,
but noted in its description of current resources for access and equity that:
"Two of the staff in the [corporate Access and Equity] unit are dedicated to Aboriginal affairs and
effectively perform the functions of an Aboriginal Affairs Office as contemplated in recommendation
no. 11 in the Task Force's draft final report. Another staff person carries a disabilities issues
portfolio, which includes the responsibilities envisaged in recommendation no. 13 in the draft final
report."
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee referred the Task Force's recommendations nos. 11
and 13 to the CAO for a report thereon directly to City Council. The present report responds to that
request. The Chair of the Task Force on Community Access and Equity was consulted during the
preparation of this report and concurs with its recommendations.
Comments:
Following the above-noted referral of recommendations 11 and 13, staff consulted further with
Councillor Mihevc, the Chair of the Task Force. Councillor Mihevc advised staff that, from the
perspective of the Task Force, the creation of Offices of Aboriginal Affairs and Disability Issues is
essential. During the Task Force's consultations with the Aboriginal Community and people with
disabilities, the theme of establishing offices was constant and resounding. Both communities
argued that an "office" would allow a focus and energy that might not otherwise emerge.
Councillor Mihevc also advised staff that the creation of offices for Aboriginal Affairs and disability
issues would not be precedent setting by opening the door for other groups wanting to establish an
office. The Task Force heard from a variety of equity seeking communities, many of whom
recognized the unique needs of people with disabilities and the Aboriginal community. The Task
Force concluded that urban Aboriginal issues and issues related to disabilities are uniquely
marginalized and that designated "offices" will raise both the profile and priority of these issues
within the City.
The CAO's report outlining resources for access and equity functions in the City assumes that the
current expertise, coordination and support functions regarding both Aboriginal affairs and
disability issues will continue to be provided within the corporate Access and Equity Unit. In view
of the Task Force's conclusions about the importance of designated offices for Aboriginal Affairs
and Disability Issues, it is recommended that Council endorse the Task Force on Community Access
and Equity's recommendations nos. 11 and 13.
In order to implement these recommendations, it is recommended that the City establish an Office
of Aboriginal Affairs and an Office of Disability Issues within the corporate Access and Equity Unit
in the Chief Administrator's Office. It is further recommended that the establishment of these two
offices be accomplished within the approved budget and staffing levels of the corporate Access and
Equity Unit.
Conclusions:
The recommendations in this report clarify how the Task Force's recommendations nos. 11 and 13
will be implemented within existing resources and the organizational structure outlined in the report
entitled "Resources for Access and Equity Functions". The Task Force's recommendation
86 requests the CAO to provide a status report after 12 months on the implementation of the Task
Force's recommendations. It is recommended that, in preparing the status report requested in the
Task Force's recommendation no. 86, the CAO comment specifically on progress regarding the
implementation of Offices for Aboriginal Affairs and Disability Issues and the development of their
mandates and City and community relationships.)
(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, a communication
(June 8, 1999) from Ms. Anne Dubas, President, CUPE, Local 79, requesting that the City work
towards employment equity in the workplace by a joint decision-making process between the
employer and its unions.)
1. 1 Task Force on Community Access and Equity, Diversity Our Strength, Access and Equity Our Goal, Draft Report,
January 1999
2. 2 ibid.
3. 3 ibid.
4. 4 ibid.
5. 5 ibid.
6. 6 Ibid.
7. 7 ibid.
8. 8 Toronto Transition Team, New City, New Opportunities, December 1997
9. 9 City of Toronto Chief Administrative Officer & Executive Director of Human Resources, Preliminary Review of
International Municipal Access and Equity Practices, July 1998
10. 10 minutes from meeting between Task Force members and commissioner & staff of Community & Neighbourhood
Services department on June 15, 1998, included in Departmental Responses to the Role of Access and Equity, June
1998
11. 11 minutes from meeting between Task Force members and commissioner & staff of Corporate Services department on
June 12, 1998
12. 12 minutes from meeting between Task Force members and commissioner & staff of Works and Emergency Services
department on June 8, 1998
13. 13 Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee Report 8 (6), adopted as amended by Council May 13, 1998
14. 14 Task Force on Community Access and Equity (January 1999)
15. 15 ibid.
3
Smog Prevention and Reduction: Status Report
and Work Plan
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that:
(1) Chapter 212 (with set fines) be enforced within the limits of the former City of
Toronto in combination with enforcement of By-law No. 673-1998 by way of
certificate of offence and summons under Part 1 of the Provincial Offences Act in the
areas of the new City, other than in the geographical region of the former City of
Toronto, until such time as the set fines for By-law No. 673-1998 have been
established;
(2) enforcement be conducted by staff from Municipal Licensing and Standards and
Parking Enforcement Officers;
(3) the Chief of Police be requested to allocate police officers and cadets to enforce the
by-laws, especially during smog days;
(4) enforcement be on a complaint basis and be pro-active on smog days; and
(5) the following motions be referred to the Chief Administrative Officer:
Moved by Councillor Adams:
'That the Clause be amended by:
(1) inserting in Recommendation No (8) embodied in the report dated
May 18, 1999, from the Chief Administrative Officer, the words "and
Nanticoke Generating Station" after the words "Lakeview
Generating Station", so that such recommendation shall now read as
follows:
"(8) City Council request Ontario Hydro to adopt emergency
measures which would provide for the reduction of power
generation at the Lakeview Generating Station and Nanticoke
Generating Station during smog alert days;"; and
(2) adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that the Chief Administrative Officer be
requested to submit a report to Council in July or September, through
the Policy and Finance Committee, on the feasibility of providing free
Toronto Transit Commission tokens or tickets to City staff for use on
public transit on Smog Alert days." '
Moved by Councillor Fotinos:
'It is further recommended that the Environmental Task Force be requested
to begin looking at options pursued in other countries, such as the feasibility
of a plan that would exclude vehicles from the downtown core on alternate
days of the week, based on an even and odd licence plate system.'
Moved by Councillor King:
'It is further recommended that the Medical Officer of Health be requested
to prepare a one-page Notice advising the public on how best to respond to
Smog Alerts, and that such Notice be sent out with the next water bill.'
Moved by Councillor Layton:
'B. That Councillor Layton's Recommendation No. (4), embodied in his
report dated June 1, 1999, be adopted, subject to striking out the
phrase "That staff be directed to" and substituting the phrase "That
a report be brought to the July Council meeting about how staff
can"; and adding the phrase "the vehicle is required for the
employee's work", so that such recommendation shall now reads as
follows:
"(4) That a report be brought forward to the July Council meeting
on how staff can immediately implement an employee parking
policy for City Hall and all other work locations so that free
commuting spaces become pay for parking, unless free
parking is required because of a disability, contractual
obligations, an occupational health and safety concern or the
vehicle is required for the employee's work; and that the
Parking Authority of Toronto be responsible for the
administration of the City Hall commuter spaces and a system
be developed for other sites;";
C. That the Medical Officer of Health and the Chief Administrative
Officer secure from the Budget Committee resources to create a smog
response team to speed up the implementation of the Smog Plan
adopted by Council in May 1998, and instigate any other initiatives
that will reduce smog; and
D. That the report dated June 7, 1999, from the Chief Administrative
Officer be adopted.'
Moved by Councillor Mihevc:
'That the motion by Councillor Shiner be amended by adding thereto the
words "and further, that the Chief Administrative Officer be requested to
submit a report to the Administration Committee on the use of the Council
drivers if this directive is implemented." '
Moved by Councillor Shiner:
'It is further recommended that City Councillors' cars not be made available
or used on smog alert days.'
Moved by Councillor Moeser:
'That:
(1) Recommendation No. (4) embodied in the report dated June 1, 1999,
from Councillor Jack Layton, be referred to the Office Consolidation
Sub-Committee for further consideration and report thereon to the
Administration Committee; and
(2) Part B of Councillor Layton's motion be referred to the Office
Consolidation Sub-Committee.'
Moved by Councillor Pantalone:
'That Part B of Councillor Layton's motion be referred to the Chief
Administrative Officer for report thereon to the Administration
Committee.' ")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends:
(1) the adoption of the report (May 18, 1999) from the Chief Administrative Officer; and
(2) that Council reiterate its support for the Toronto District Heating Corporation's Deep
Lake Water Cooling Project, and that staff be instructed to finalize the Energy Sharing
Agreement with the Toronto District Heating Corporation by the end of June, 1999.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports, for the information of Council, having taken
the following action respecting the communication (June 1, 1999) from Councillor Jack Layton:
(i) referred the following Recommendation No. (1) to the City Solicitor for report
thereon to the meeting of Council scheduled to be held on June 9, 1999:
"(1) that the City immediately institute enforcement of the Anti-Idling
Bylaw using a Part 3 Summons technique and that this enforcement
be intensified during Smog Days;
(ii) approved the following Recommendation No. (2), as amended:
"(2) that the City Solicitor report directly to Council on June 9, 1999:
(i) on the status of the application for the "set fine" for the Anti
Idling By- law which was approved unanimously by City
Council early last year; and
(ii) on the applicability of the provisions of Section 102 of the
Municipal Act to passing an Anti-Idling By-law;" and
(iii) referred the following Recommendations Nos. (3), (4) and (5) to the Chief
Administrative Officer for report thereon directly to Council for its meeting
scheduled to be held on June 9, 1999:
"(3) that staff initiate car pooling at all of the former City Hall locations
for Summer 1999, in consultation with the Toronto Environmental
Alliance which has experience in helping many large institutions
develop and instigate car pooling plans.
(4) that staff be directed to immediately implement an employee parking
policy for City Hall and all other work locations so that free
commuting spaces become pay for parking, unless free parking is
required because of a disability, contractual obligations, or an
occupational health and safety concern; and that the Parking
Authority of Toronto be responsible for the administration of the City
Hall commuter spaces and a system be developed for other sites;
(5) that existing City of Toronto materials that have been developed by
Toronto Public Health on how children, the elderly and people with
lung and heart conditions can deal with smog days be distributed to
the public, possibly via doctors offices in conjunction with the
Ontario Medical Association; and that the Chief Administrative
Officer and Budget Committee report directly to Council on the funds
required to and the source of the funds."
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following report (May 18, 1999)
from the Chief Administrative Officer:
Purpose:
To report on the status of the smog prevention and reduction recommendations adopted by City
Council on May 13 and 14, 1998, and to outline a work plan for the next stages of implementation.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no immediate financial implications arising from the recommendations in this report.
Subsequent reports will provide the financial implications of implementing each recommendation,
including possible funding sources.
A potential funding source for anti-smog initiatives is the Federal Climate Change Action Fund.
This fund seeks to allocate $150 million for climate change initiatives. Four types of project are to
be funded: (i) technology early action measures; (ii) public outreach; (iii) foundation analysis; and
(iv) science, impacts and adaptation.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the appropriate departments, under the coordination of the Toronto Inter-Departmental
Environment (TIE) Team, explore opportunities for funding from the National Climate
Change Fund to assist the City in meeting its smog reduction targets;
(2) City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to provide distribution and marketing
services for the TTC Annual Metropass Discount Program to City of Toronto employees as
an incentive to encourage reduction of employee automobile use;
(3) City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission and the Finance Department to make
TTC Metropasses available to City employees using a monthly payroll deduction program;
(4) in support of this Employee Trip Reduction Program, City Council actively request that the
Federal Minister of Finance make employer-provided transit passes an income tax-exempt
benefit for employees;
(5) the City join the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the
Federation of Canadian Municipalities Partners for Climate Protection Program (PCP) in
order to help the City monitor its progress in meeting its adopted greenhouse gas targets;
(6) the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services and the Chief Administrative Officer,
as the co-chairs of the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team, report annually
on the City's progress in achieving the milestones of the Partners for Climate Protection
Program (PCP);
(7) City Council endorse, in principle, the installation of the proposed natural gas capacity at the
Lakeview Generating Station with the intention of an eventual full conversion from coal to
natural gas;
(8) City Council request Ontario Hydro to adopt emergency measures which would provide for
the reduction of power generation at the Lakeview Generating Station during smog alert
days;
(9) the Chief Administrative Officer explore with Federal and Provincial officials ways and
means available to ensure that transboundary air pollution issues affecting the City are
addressed; and
(10) the appropriate City staff be authorized and directed to take necessary action to give effect
thereto.
Council Reference:
On May 13 and 14, 1998, City Council adopted a notice of motion containing fifty-four
recommendations related to smog reduction and prevention. These recommendations had been
previously adopted by the Councils of the former City of Toronto and the Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto. These recommendations requested that the Chief Administrative Officer
report in the following areas:
(i) the development of an Employee Trip Reduction program;
(ii) a work plan to implement the 'Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto';
(iii) the development of a Public Education campaign on smog;
(iv) the development of a Municipal Smog-Alert Response Plan;
(v) the promotion of the City's Corporate Smog Initiatives and smog reducing commuting
practices;
(vi) the development and implementation of Green Fleets initiatives;
(vii) the City participation in the "Ozone Transport Rulemaking" process;
(viii) purchasing 'Green' Power for the City; and
(ix) producing an annual Anti-Smog report.
This report responds to these requests.
Executive Summary:
Research into the status of the recommendations revealed that some of the recommendations have
been implemented, others are in progress and some have yet to be acted upon. The attached report,
"Smog Prevention and Reduction: Detailed Status Report and Work Plan" provides a summary and
status of each of the recommendation adopted by Council, identifies the lead department(s) and
division(s), and outlines the 1999-2000 work plan to further the implementation of
recommendations.
In March 1999, the Smog Reduction Work Group, a sub-committee of the Toronto
Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team, was convened by the Healthy City Office to assist in
the preparation of a co-ordinated response to Council's adopted anti-smog recommendations, and
to oversee corporate policy and planning activities. The Work Group has, and will continue to report
to TIE on a regular basis.
In order to report on the status of the notice of motion adopted by City Council in May 1998, the
recommendations have been organized into seven issue areas:
(I) Smog Alert
(II) Smog Prevention and Reduction
(III) Public Education and Communications
(IV) Green Fleets
(V) Employee Trip Reduction
(VI) Targets, Measuring and Monitoring
(VII) Inter-governmental Relations
Status of Recommendations:
(I) Smog Alert:
The adopted Smog Alert recommendations requested that the City: develop and implement
a Corporate and Municipal smog alert response plan, investigate reducing the amount of
incineration at the Main Treatment Plant, ask the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to
develop a strategy for smog alert days, and use electronic message sign boards along the 401
corridor, within City of Toronto boundaries, to alert the public of smog alert days and their
health impacts. Many of the Smog Alert related recommendations have been implemented.
A Corporate Smog Alert Response Plan was implemented during the 1998 smog season.
The Plan was evaluated in early 1999. The Corporate Smog Alert Team met in April 1999;
it was agreed that the Corporate Smog Alert Response Plan will include the same initiatives
as 1998 with appropriate improvements as identified in the evaluation.
To date, a Municipal Smog Alert Response Plan has not been fully developed, however,
there are many avenues of communication through which City of Toronto residents are
notified of smog alert days, for example, smog alert messages posted on electronic sign
boards along the 401 corridor, Don Valley Parkway and Gardiner Expressway. As part of
the 1999-2000 Work Plan the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team's Smog
Reduction Work Group will initiate the development of a broad-based municipal smog alert
response plan for the 2000 smog season and bring forward a report in early 2000. This plan
will be developed in conjunction with a broad-based public education campaign on smog.
(II) Smog Prevention and Reduction:
The adopted Smog Prevention and Reduction recommendation requested a work plan for the
implementation of the strategy 'Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto', adopted,
in principle, by City Council at its May 13, and 14, 1998, meeting; the development of a
municipal vehicle inspection and maintenance program; and that the City promote its
corporate smog initiatives.
There has been action on all three fronts. Briefly, the Blueprint will be used to guide and
direct the work of the City and the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team's
Smog Reduction Work Group. The Corporate fleet must comply with the emission standards
of the Provincial Drive Clean Program. The Director of Fleet Management Services is
currently investigating how best to meet the requirements of the Program. Based on a cost
comparison, the Director will recommend in a report to the Corporate Services Committee
whether the emissions testing should be contracted out or conducted in-house. Finally, the
City is actively promoting its anti-smog initiatives through Urban Planning and Development
Services Transportation Management Association (TMA) pilot project. This two year project
will involve public and private employers. TMA's have been effective in other cities in
assisting employers with savings on parking costs, reducing travel between work locations,
office space reduction, and reducing pollution from employee travel.
In addition, Public Health staff, for the summer of 1999, will work in partnership with a large
employer on the implementation of a smog alert response plan similar to the one
implemented by the City of Toronto.
(III) Public Education and Communications:
The adopted Public Education and Communications recommendations request the
development of a city-wide broad-based public education campaign on smog, and that the
City consider establishing an Air Quality Advice Line and Dirty Diesel Hotline across the
Municipality.
To date, initial steps have been taken to implement a comprehensive public education
campaign. For the 1999 smog season the Healthy City Office and Public Health are
distributing smog related information through local environmental events such as Pollution
Probe's Clean Air Commute and City Councillors' Environment Day events and providing
information displays at special events. The Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE)
Team's Smog Reduction Work Group will identify an appropriate public education plan on
smog and lead staff for the 2000 smog season.
With regards to the establishment of an air quality advice line and diesel hotline, the Ministry
of Environment currently operates a Diesel Hotline through its public call centre. This
existing diesel hotline could be used as part of a public education campaign on smog. The
possibility of setting up an air quality advice line will be considered by the Smog Reduction
Work Group as part of the development of a public education plan. The Work Group will
report on these plans in early 2000.
(IV) Green Fleets:
The adopted Green Fleets recommendations request the convening of a Corporate Green
Fleets Committee to: replace motorized vehicles with non-motorized alternatives, substitute
currently used fuels with less polluting alternative fuels, and prepare a report on the
feasibility and cost of implementing a green fleet strategy. In addition, the motion requests
the adoption of specific emissions reduction targets for the City fleets.
The convening of a Corporate Green Fleets Committee in December 1997 has been
important to the work in this area. A Corporate Green Fleets Strategy Status Report was
submitted to the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment Team (TIE) on June 3, 1998. The
report provides information on the steps that are being taken to develop a corporate green
fleet strategy directed at reducing smog causing emissions from City vehicles and equipment.
The Corporate Green Fleets Committee will reconvene in the Fall of 1999. At that time, it
will study the feasibility of reducing fleet emissions by 50 percent, and report to Council on
the Green Fleet strategy.
(V) Employee Trip Reduction:
The adopted Employee Trip Reduction recommendations request the development of a
comprehensive auto trip reduction program be developed for the City, and that a survey of
employee travel be conducted.
An Employee Trip Reduction Program (ETRP) is being developed in a phased approach by
the Healthy City Office and Urban Planning and Development Services. The initial phase
of this program will concentrate on the design and implementation of incentives encouraging
employees to use public transit. This report recommends that City Council approve the use
of payroll deduction for payment of TTC Metropasses for City of Toronto employees. The
ease of this Metropass purchasing process would create a convenience incentive to
employees interested in public transit. We also recommend that City Council request that
the Federal Minister of Finance make employer-provided transit passes an income-tax
exempt benefit for employees.
Subsequent phases of the ETRP will be developed following a comprehensive survey of
employee travel, to be conducted by Urban Planning and Development Services and The
Healthy City Office. Subsequent phases will address parking allowance for City employees,
ridesharing, and telecommuting. The next phase of the ETRP will be reported on in early
2000.
To facilitate the development and implementation of employee trip reduction initiatives a
$50,000.00 Clean Air Action Fund has been established under the Toronto Atmosphere
Fund.
(VI) Targets, Measuring and Monitoring:
The adopted recommendations request the adoption of specific emissions reduction targets
for the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) and the City of Toronto; the purchase of green
power for the City; monitoring the economic benefits of implementing anti-smog action and
monitoring emissions reductions.
There has been action on most of the adopted recommendations. City Council on May 13,
1998, adopted all of the recommended targets in the motion. The City will be able to
monitor its progress in achieving emissions reduction targets with a database being set up by
Works and Emergency Services to quantify and monitor municipal and corporate greenhouse
gas and air pollution emissions. It is recommended that the City join the International
Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities Partners for Climate Protection Program (PCP) in order to help the City
monitor its progress in meeting its adopted greenhouse gas targets, and to assist in learning
from the experience of other cities.
With regards to the purchase of green power for City use, the Environmental Task Force's
(ETF) Sustainable Energy Use Work Group is developing a Sustainable Energy Use Plan for
the City that will guide decision-making and policy development on energy use for the City;
and help move the City from its dependence on fossil fuels to alternative green energy
sources such as wind and solar power. The Energy Use Plan will report on the availability
of green power sources, renewable energy targets, and demand and supply-side options for
the City. The report will be completed during the summer of 1999.
(VII) Intergovernmental Issues:
The adopted intergovernmental recommendations ask City Council to support the lobbying
efforts of the Board of Health to other levels of government on greenhouse gas emissions
reduction; to participate in efforts to deal with transboundary air pollution; and request
Ontario Hydro to adopt emergency measures during smog alert days.
City Council endorsed the actions of the Board of Health with the May 13, 1998, motion.
With regards to the issue of transboundary air pollution, the Council of the former City of
Toronto concluded that due to constitutional restrictions on the ability of the City to
participate directly in international negotiations, the most effective way for the City to
participate in transboundary air pollution negotiations is in partnership with the Province.
City Council's request regarding emergency measures for smog alert days was not forwarded
to Ontario Hydro. In light of the December 15, 1998 announcement to investigate the
development of a natural-gas cycle power plant at the Lakeview Generating Station site, this
report recommends that City Council endorse, in principle, the installation of the proposed
natural gas capacity at Lakeview with the intention of an eventual full conversion from coal
to natural gas in order to reduce air pollution emissions.
The report also recommends that City Council ensure that the issues highlighted in this report
form part of the inter-governmental agenda for the City of Toronto in its involvement with
the Greater Toronto Services Board, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the
Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and other related forums.
Work Plan:
The following outlines the 1999 - 2000 work plan for the recommendations which have yet to be
acted upon. The work plan has been agreed to by all the identified departments.
What is to be achieved |
Timelines |
Responsibility |
Development of a city-wide public education
campaign on smog and smog alert response
plan for the 2000 smog season. This process
will also assess the feasibility of an Air Quality
Advice Line. |
Report in early
2000 |
Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment
(TIE) Team Smog Reduction Work Group |
Investigate and report on the feasibility of road
closures during smog alert days |
Report by June
1999 |
Works and Emergency Services |
Work with the TTC and Go Transit in
developing a contingency transportation plan
during smog alert days. |
Report by June
1999 |
Works and Emergency Services |
For the 1999 Smog season distribute
educational material on smog to residents. |
Spring/Summer
1999 |
Healthy City Office and Public Health |
Study the feasibility of reducing fleet emissions
by 50 percent. |
Fall 1999- early
2000 |
Corporate Green Fleets Committee |
Report on the feasibility and cost of
implementing a Green Fleet Strategy for the
Corporation. |
Fall 1999 -
early 2000 |
Corporate Green Fleets Committee |
Conduct a survey of employee travel for the
Corporation |
Spring/Summer
1999 |
Healthy City Office and Urban Planning
and Development Services |
Develop next phases of an employee trip
reduction program for the Corporation. |
Report in early
2000 |
Healthy City Office and Urban Planning
and Development Services |
Report on the feasibility of committing to
purchasing 25 percent of electricity used-in
house by the City of Toronto from green power
sources. |
Summer of
1999 |
Environmental Task Force's Sustainable
Energy Use Group |
Report on a mechanism to monitor the
environmental, social, and economic impacts of
City initiatives. |
Fall 1999
|
Healthy City Office |
Annual Anti-Smog Report |
Annual |
Healthy City Office |
City Council ensure that the issues highlighted
in this report form part of the
intergovernmental agenda for the City of
Toronto in its involvement with the Greater
Services Board, Association of Municipalities
of Ontario, the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities, and other related forums. |
On-going |
|
Conclusion:
The smog reduction recommendations adopted by City Council present an ambitious set of targets
and initiatives. This report presents an update of activities already underway and outlines a Work
Plan to deal with smog for 1999 - 2000.
A review on the status of adopted anti-smog recommendations demonstrates that the City has
responded with many actions which are, and will, contribute to smog reduction in the City. The
work that is currently underway represents the first steps in an on-going process to deal with the
sources of smog both within the Corporation and the City. The implementation of existing
anti-recommendations will also spawn opportunities to expand and build new initiatives.
There is now an opportunity for the City to demonstrate its leadership and commitment as a
corporation in taking urgent action against smog by committing to the on-going process of smog
reduction. The City is in a unique position to play a proactive and leading role, and to create
opportunities for City employees to contribute directly through their own practices towards reducing
smog. Toronto can be a role model for cities and corporations in Canada and the world.
Contact Names:
Lisa Salsberg, Healthy City Office, Tel.: 392-1086; Fax: 392-0089;
email: lsalsber@toronto.ca
--------
Smog Prevention and Reduction
Detailed Status Report and Work Plan
Healthy City Office
City of Toronto
May 18, 1999
Table of Contents
(1) Introduction
(1.1) Council Reference
(1.2) Smog Reduction Work Group
(2) Status of Smog Reduction Recommendations
(2.1) Smog Alert
(2.2) Smog Prevention and Reduction
(2.3) Public Education and Communication
(2.4) Green Fleets
(2.5) Employee Trip Reduction
(2.6) Targets, Measuring and Monitoring
(2.7) Intergovernmental Relations
(3) Conclusion
(4) Recommendations
(5) Appendices
(1) 1999 - 2000 Work Plan
(2) Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto
(3) Table of Status of Recommendations
--------
(1) Introduction:
Over the last several years, the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) has earned the reputation of
being one of the smoggiest metropolitan areas in Canada. Smog is a distinct form of poor
air quality. It occurs on hot summer days when a combination of toxic gases and fine
particles forms through a series of chemical reactions triggered by sunlight and heat. Each
summer Toronto experiences a number of "smog episodes" or "smog days" on which air
quality falls well below acceptable health standards. During the summer of 1998 alone, three
separate Air Quality Advisories were called by the Ministry of Environment which lasted a
total of seven days.
The negative impacts of poor air quality upon the health of citizens, the environment, and the
economy have been documented in a number of reports, including "Smog: Make It or Break
It", "Catching Your Breath: A Corporate Model for Clean Air" and "Catching Your Breath:
Partnerships for Clean Air", produced by the former City of Toronto's Healthy City Office;
and "Outdoor Air Quality: Issues and Concerns" and "Outdoor Air Quality and Respiratory
Health" produced by the Public Health Department.
Most recently, as part of the process for setting Canada Wide Standards (CWS) for various
air pollutants, the Federal - Provincial Working Group on Air Quality Objectives and
Guidelines released the "Ground-level Ozone Science Assessment Document". The report
states that the negative health impacts for ground-level ozone are being documented at levels
well below (5 times) the current National Ambient Air Quality Objective for ozone. What
is of concern about this finding is that there is mounting evidence that ground-level ozone
concentrations are increasing in urban areas. Ground-level ozone, a toxic and irritant gas
even at minimal quantities, is the main component of smog in Toronto. The David Suzuki
Foundation's report "Taking Our Breath Away: The Health Effects of Air Pollution and
Climate Change" warns that the production of ground-level ozone, and urban smog, is on the
rise due to increasingly hot weather resulting from increasing greenhouse gas emissions
(caused by the combustion of fossil fuels).
Deteriorating air quality results in higher rates of asthma attacks; damage to plants, crops,
and building; and threatens Toronto's tourism industry, and business in general according
to the Provincial report Ontario's Smog Plan released in January 1998. Smog is one of the
most persistent air quality problems facing Ontario.
1.1 Council Reference:
On May 13 and 14, 1998, City Council adopted a notice of motion containing
fifty-four recommendations related to smog reduction and prevention. These
recommendations had been previously adopted by the Councils of the former City of
Toronto and the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.
The anti-smog recommendations adopted by City Council reflect the diversity of
local sources of smog causing pollutants, including motor vehicles and other modes
of transportation, industries and utilities. The recommendations prescribe action in
the major smog areas. They also deal with the role of the City as a large employer
and emitter of pollutants that can result in smog formation.
1.2 Smog Reduction Work Group:
In March 1999, the Smog Reduction Work Group, a sub-committee of the Toronto
Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team, was convened by the Healthy City
Office to assist in the preparation of a co-ordinated response to Council's adopted
anti-smog recommendations, and to oversee corporate policy and planning activities.
The Work Group has, and will continue to report to TIE on a regular basis.
(2) Status of Smog Reduction Recommendations:
In order to report on the status of the notice of motion adopted by City Council in May 1998,
the recommendations have been organized into seven issue areas:
(2.1) Smog Alert;
(2.2) Smog Prevention and Reduction;
(2.3) Public Education and Communications;
(2.4) Green Fleets;
(2.5) Employee Trip Reduction;
(2.6) Targets, Measuring and Monitoring; and
(2.7) Intergovernmental Relations.
Research into the status of the recommendations revealed that some of the recommendations
have been implemented, others are in progress and some have yet to be acted upon. Table1
(attached) provides a summary and status of each of the recommendation adopted by
Council, and identifies the lead department(s) and division(s). This report summarizes the
recommendations which were adopted, provides their current status, and outlines the
1999-2000 work plan to further the implementation of the recommendations.
2.1 Smog Alert:
Adopted Recommendations:
(a) Corporate Smog Alert: To implement a corporate-wide Smog Response
Plan, including developing an information brochure for employees on the
health impacts of smog, and what they can do to reduce their own
contributions to the smog problem and investigate road closures during smog
alert days.
(b) Electronic Sign Boards: Request the Minister of Transportation to authorize
the use of electronic sign boards to alert the public to the air quality index and
for similar public health announcements.
(c) Toronto Transit Commission: Encourage the Toronto Transit Commission
not to cut any more of their services, ask the TTC to develop a strategy for
Smog Alert Days, and work with the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) and
GO Transit to develop contingency transportation plan.
(d) Incineration at the Main Treatment Plant: The Commissioner of Works and
Emergency Services be requested to examine the possibility of reducing the
amount of incineration at the Main Treatment Plant, specifically on smog
alert days.
(e) City-Wide Smog Alert Response Plan: That the City of Toronto develop the
means to implement a City-wide Smog Alert Response Plan, activated by the
Medical Officer of Health, to come into effect when the Provincial Air
Quality Index (AQI) is predicted to reach a level of 50, starting in the spring
of 1998. (This recommendation is embodied in the Blueprint for
Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto' (please refer to Appendix 2) adopted,
in principle, by City Council at its May 13 and 14, 1998 meeting.)
Status of Recommendations:
(a) The Medical Officer of Health submitted a report to City Council outlining a
Corporate Smog Alert Response Plan at its meeting of June 3 and 4, 1998. The Plan
was unanimously adopted by City Council at that meeting. This Plan is activated by
the Medical Officer of Health when the Provincial Air Quality Index (AQI) reaches
a level of 50 (the scale ranges from (0-100+) which indicates that the quality of the
air is poor. Each City division developed and implemented their Divisional Plan.
Actions taken by City departments and employees during the 1998 Smog Alert
Season included:
(i) the suspension of all non-essential vehicles;
(ii) suspension of activities that involve the use of oil-based paints, solvents and
cleaners;
(iii) suspension of activities requiring gas powered equipment;
(iv) suspension of pesticide spraying activities;
(v) suspension of re-fueling activities for all non-essential municipal vehicles
until after dark on Smog Alert Days; and
(vi) air-conditioning units in municipal offices were set to warmer temperatures
and staff were allowed to dress casually.
Fact sheets outlining the Corporation's Smog Alert Response Plan and brochures
outlining the health effects of smog were produced and distributed to all City
departments and employees. The Plan was evaluated in early 1999 in order to assess
if the Smog Alert Notification Protocol succeeded in informing city staff of smog
alerts; if staff were able to implement Divisional Smog Alert Response Plans during
a Smog Alert period; and if staff received and were aware of communication and
educational Smog Alert materials.
The evaluation received an overall response rate of 50 percent. The evaluation
revealed that across all divisions, employees were more aware of the Corporate Smog
Alert Plan (67 percent) than their own Divisional Response Plan (43 percent).
Additional emphasis may be needed in 1999 on the specific activities to be modified
within each division. Further, 36 percent of those employees that were aware of their
Divisional Plans modified their work activities during a smog alert.
The Corporate Smog Alert Team met in April 1999 to confirm the Divisional
Response Plans and notification for the 1999 smog season. The Team agreed that the
Corporate Smog Alert Response Plan would include the same initiatives as 1998
with appropriate improvements as identified in the evaluation.
(b) A copy of the recommendations adopted by City Council at its meeting held on
May 13 and 14, 1998, were forwarded to the Provincial Minister of Transportation
on May 21, 1998. The Provincial Ministry of Transportation manages, and is
responsible for, posting information on 20 (out of 30) electronic sign boards along
the 401 corridor. Depending on the time of day and time of year different messages
are displayed. Daily, during peak periods (6:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to
7:30 p.m.), traffic safety and congestion management messages are displayed.
During off-peak periods general public education messages relating to air quality,
such as promoting the use of public transit, and urging drivers to keep their vehicles
in good working condition, are displayed. During the 1999 smog season, smog
related public education messages will be displayed during the last two weeks of
July. Messages displayed on the Highway 401 changeable message signs include:
"Help Reduce Smog Keep Your Vehicle Tuned", "Let's Clear The Air Tune Up Your
Vehicle", "Help Cut Smog Keep Vehicles Tuned", "Reduce Congestion by Car
Pooling", "Share A Ride Try Car Pooling", and "Cut Travel Costs by Car Pooling".
Currently the Air Quality Index (AQI) is not displayed. According to the Ministry,
the AQI is not posted because of two main reasons. First, they cannot obtain the
information early enough to display it and program it into their computerized
messaging system. Second, the target audience, the daily commuter, will not see the
AQI because during peak commuting time safety and congestion management
messages are displayed. The City posts smog alert information on the electronic sign
boards on the Don Valley Parkway and the Gardiner Expressway, over which it has
jurisdiction. The City displays messages such as "Smog Alert Tomorrow: Use
Transit" and "Smog Alert: Reduce Vehicle Use".
(c) A copy of the recommendations adopted by City Council were forwarded to the
Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) on May 21, 1998. At its meeting of June 17,
1998, the Commission reviewed the "Anti-Smog Initiatives" plan adopted by City
Council. The Commission endorsed the plan, and referred it to staff for a report back
to the Commission. The staff report (November 30, 1998) outlines the TTC's
strategy for smog alerts which is, and has been, to promote the market for, and use
of, public transit as an alternative to the automobile. The TTC has the capacity to
provide for the additional riders that would be expected to change their commuting
habits on Smog Alert Days.
(d) Currently, there are plans to end incineration at the Main Treatment Plant by the year
2000. The Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services has indicated that, at
present, it is not feasible to make significant adjustments to the amount of
incineration on a daily basis.
(e) The strategy 'Blueprint for Action' was adopted, in principle, by City Council at its
May 13 and 14, 1998 meeting. A component of the strategy proposes the
development and implementation of a City-wide Smog Alert Response Plan,
activated by the Medical Officer of Health, when the Provincial Air Quality Index
(AQI) reaches a level of 50. To date, a Municipal Smog Alert Response Plan has not
been fully developed, however, there are many avenues of communication through
which City of Toronto residents are notified of smog alert days including: City
controlled electronic sign board on the Don Valley Parkway and the Gardiner
Expressway (smog alert messages are posted); the media (television, radio and print);
and notification from the Ministry of Environment and Energy. In addition, Public
Health staff are exploring a partnership with a large employer in Toronto to see if
they can implement smog alert measures similar to those that the City of Toronto has
implemented. As part of the 1999-2000 work plan, the TIE's Smog Reduction Work
Group will initiate the development of a broad-based municipal smog alert response
plan for the 2000 smog season. The Work Group will bring forward a report in early
2000. Currently, the Province is finalizing a Municipal Smog Alert Response Guide,
which may provide financial support for the development of municipal smog alert
plans.
Next Steps - 1999/2000 Work Plan:
(a) Road Closures during Smog Alert Days: Works and Emergency Services will investigate
and report on the feasibility of road closures during smog alert days by June 1999.
(b) Transportation Contingency Plan: Work and Emergency Services will work with the TTC
and Go Transit in developing a contingency transportation plan during smog alert days by
June 1999.
(c) The TIE's Smog Reduction Work Group will initiate the development of the municipal smog
alert response plan and bring forward a report in early 2000.
2.2 Smog Prevention and Reduction:
Adopted Recommendations:
(a) 'Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto': That the City develop the
legislation, policies, programs and partnerships with business, other levels of
government, non-government organizations, individuals and international agencies
required to implement the strategy 'Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in
Toronto' outlined in the report 'Catching Your Breath - Partnership for Clean Air'.
Please see appendix 2 for the recommendations outlined in the Blueprint.
(b) Municipal Inspection and Maintenance Program: City Council seek the necessary
legislation to permit the City of Toronto to implement a municipal inspection and
maintenance program for vehicles licensed within the City of Toronto, at full cost
recovery.
(c) Across the Municipality, that the City promote its own corporate smog reduction
program, and in conjunction with area employers develop a program to promote and
facilitate smog-friendly commuting practices.
Status of Recommendations:
(a) The strategy 'Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto', (see appendix 2) embodied
in the former City of Toronto's report 'Catching Your Breath - Partnership for Clean Air",
was adopted, in principle, by City Council at its May 13, and 14, 1998 meeting. The
Blueprint recommends specific actions to reduce smog across the City of Toronto and
outlines policies and initiatives (in the areas of municipal smog alert; smog prevention;
communication and education; and commitment) required to achieve those targets.
The Smog Reduction Work Group, a subcommittee of TIE, was formed in early 1999 to
assist in the preparation of a co-ordinated response to Council's adopted recommendations,
and oversee corporate policy and planning activities in this area. The Blueprint will be used
to guide the anti-smog work of the City and the Work Group. Stakeholders will be invited
to participate in the subcommittee.
Highlights of City of Toronto initiatives and policies that have been implemented, or are in
the process of being implemented, that further the goals of the Blueprint include:
Implemented:
(i) the convening of the Smog Reduction Work Group;
(ii) City Council's re-commitment to support the work of the Toronto Atmospheric Fund
(TAF);
(iii) the expansion of the Better Building Partnership Program to the entire City;
(iv) City Council at its December 16, 1998 meeting re-adopted, as a city-wide target for
the new City of Toronto, a carbon dioxide emissions reduction goal of 20 percent
relative to 1990 levels by the year 2005;
(v) Anti-Idling By-law came into effect in 1996. This by-law limits idling to no more
than three minutes in a given 60 minute period (transit is exempt); and
(vi) City Council at its December 16, 1988 meeting adopted, in principle, a ban on
pesticide use on all City property.
Work in Progress:
(i) the Sustainable Transportation Plan being developed by the Sustainable
Transportation Working Group of the Environmental Task Force;
(ii) the Sustainable Energy Use Plan being developed by the Sustainable Energy Use
Working Group of the Environmental Task Force;
(iii) a Transportation Management Association (TMA) pilot project (see Smog Prevention
and Reduction section);
(iv) the setting up of a centralized database to monitor and quantify municipal and
corporate emissions and emissions reduction by Works and Emergency Services (see
Targets, Measuring and Monitoring section);
(v) the Economic Development Committee at its meeting of March 29, 1999,
unanimously supported a report from the Pedestrianisation Working Group
recommending the development and implementation of a Pedestrianisation Policy for
commercial and residential streets of Toronto; and
(vi) The City's support of the Toronto Renewable Energy Cooperative (TREC).
(b) City Council at its meeting on October 1 and 2, 1998 endorsed the actions by the Ontario
Minister of the Environment to implement a mandatory vehicle inspection and maintenance
program (Drive Clean Program). This multi-phased program, operated by private contractors
and administered by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE), came into effect April 1, 1999.
The first phase of the program involves mandatory testing for vehicles registered in the GTA,
including Toronto, and in Hamilton-Wentworth. The MOE estimates that by the time the
Drive Clean program is fully operational, it will reduce smog-causing pollutants from
vehicles in the program area by 22 per cent.
At its April 13, 1999 meeting, City Council re-endorsed its support for the Drive Clean
program and requested that the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services report in
the year 2000 on the experience of the Provincial program and whether the City of Toronto
should consider carrying out its own monitoring program.
The Corporate fleet must comply with the emission standards of the Drive Clean Program.
The Director of Fleet Management Services is currently investigating how best to meet the
requirements of the Program. Based on a cost comparison, the Director will recommend in
a report to the Corporate Services Committee whether the emissions testing should be
contracted out or conducted in-house. The latter option would require the City to apply to
the Province to become an accredited Drive Test Facility.
(c) There are two City initiatives that promote the City's smog reduction programs. First, Urban
Planning and Development has received $20,000.00 from the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities and Health Canada to form a Transportation Management Association
(TMA). TMA's are formed when employers cooperate to promote transit, ridesharing,
telecommuting, cycling and walking as an alternative to single occupant car travel. This two
year pilot project will involve public and private and employers. TMA's can be a useful tool
both for employers and employees. Benefits for employers can include: savings on parking
costs, reduced travel between work locations, savings on office work space, and reduction
of employee travel emissions. For employees benefits can include: improved flexibility in
coordinating work and personal schedules, improvements in quality of commute and
potential savings on commuting. Once formed the TMA will provide the City the
opportunity to share and promote its corporate smog reduction strategies and corporate smog
alert response plan. The TMA pilot project will kick-off with a breakfast at the Board of
Trade on June 8, 1999 to introduce the TMA pilot project to the business community.
In addition, Public Health staff for the summer of 1999 will work in partnership with a larger
employer in Toronto on the implementation of a smog alert response plan similar to the one
implemented by the City of Toronto.
2.3 Public Education and Communication:
Adopted Recommendations:
The following two recommendations were referred to the Chief Administrative Officer for
further consideration and report thereon to City Council:
(a) Public Education Campaign: Consider and report on the development a broad-based
public education campaign on smog, with attention to the activities outlined in the
strategy 'Blueprint for Action - Smog Reduction in Toronto' adopted, in principle,
by City Council (Appendix 2). This campaign should include: what residents can do
to reduce their own emissions and ways to promote the City's corporate smog
reduction program to other employers and businesses; and
(b) Air Quality Advice Line and Diesel Hotline: As part of a public education campaign,
consider and report on the feasibility of establishing an Air Quality Advice Line and
Dirty Diesel Hotline across the Municipality.
Status of Recommendations:
(a) Three fact sheets detailing the effects of smog on seniors, children, and people with lung and
heart conditions were produced by Toronto Public Health. These fact sheets were made
available to the public during the 1998 smog season. For the 1999 smog season the Healthy
City Office and Public Health are distributing smog related information through local
environmental events such as Pollution Probe's Clean Air Commute and City Councillors'
Environment Day events and providing information displays at special events. The Smog
Reduction Work Group will identify an appropriate public education plan on smog and lead
staff for the 2000 smog season. The Work Group will report on the plan in early 2000.
(b) Currently, the Ministry of Environment operates a Diesel Hotline through its public call
centre. This existing diesel hotline could be used as part of a public education campaign on
smog. Through the call centre the public can report vehicles emitting visible smoke from
their exhaust pipes. Subsequently, the driver of the polluting vehicle will be advised that
they may be in contravention of air pollution laws. In addition on April 1, 1999 the Ministry
expanded its Smog Patrol program to enforce Drive Clean requirements based on Ontario's
vehicle emissions regulation (Regulation 361/98). Regulation 361/98 sets emission
standards for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles and makes it an offence to operate a vehicle
emitting visible emissions of smoke for more than 15 seconds in any five-minute period.
Through this on-road program, Provincial officers working with enforcement agencies
identify and ticket drivers of polluting vehicles that do not comply with the regulation. Also,
emission checks points are set up where officers visually observe the vehicle's exhaust,
and/or test the vehicle's exhaust. If the vehicle does not meet the standards for emissions,
the driver will be issued either a warning, offence notice and/or field order to have the
vehicle repaired.
Next Steps -1999/2000 Work Plan:
(a) Public Education Plan on Smog: For the 1999 smog season the Healthy City Office and
Public Health will be distributing smog related information through local environmental
events such as Pollution Probe's Clean Air Commute and City Councillors' Environment
Day events and providing information displays at special events. The Smog Reduction Work
Group will identify an appropriate public education plan on smog and lead staff for the 2000
smog season. The Work Group will report on this plan in early 2000.
(b) Air Quality Advice Line: The possibility of setting up an advice line will be considered by
the Smog Reduction Work Group as part of the development of a public education plan on
smog and a municipal smog alert response plan. The Work Group will report on these plans
in early 2000.
In addition, the Environmental Task Force's (ETF) Education and Awareness Work Group
is dealing with the question of how to promote education on environmental issues. The
Smog Reduction Work Group has also referred the assessment of an air quality advice line
to the Education and Awareness Work Group. The report of the ETF is expected to be
completed in the summer of 1999.
2.4 Green Fleets:
Adopted Recommendations:
(a) Green Fleets Targets: City Council, through the corporate Green Fleets Committee,
adopt targets based on 1997 levels that would achieve:
(i) a minimum 20 percent increase in zero emission vehicles by 2005 (includes
human powered vehicles);
(ii) a minimum 20 percent increase in ultra low energy vehicles by 2005; and
(iii) a minimum 20 percent reduction in fuel consumption by 2005.
(b) Reducing Corporate Fleet Emissions: The Chief Administrative Officer consider and
report to City Council on adopting a "Green Fleet" target of reducing smog causing
pollutants from its own fleet by 50 percent by 2005, through the purchase of an
increased number of alternative fuel vehicles, reduction of fleet numbers, driver
training programs, and vehicle replacement with non-car transportation modes.
(c) Corporate Green Fleets Committee: Convene a corporate Green Fleets Committee
to:
(i) replace motorized vehicles with non-motorized alternative and more efficient
systems;
(ii) substitute currently used fuels with less polluting alternative fuels, increasing
fuel efficiency and optimizing motor vehicle technology; and
(iii) as a first step prepare a report on the feasibility and cost of implementing a
green fleet strategy and report back to Council on the implementation of that
strategy.
Status of Recommendations:
(a) The three Green Fleet targets outlined in the May 13 and 14, 1998 motion, adopted by City
Council, have been considered by the Corporate Green Fleets Committee. The work of the
Committee, convened in December 1997, has been put on hold until the Corporate Fleet
Management Review is completed. The adoption of the suggested targets will be considered
once the Committee reconvenes in the Fall of 1999.
(b) The Corporate Green Fleets Committee has undertaken a series of initiatives to reduce
pollution emissions from the City fleets, such as reviewing opportunities to reduce the size
of the fleet as a result of amalgamation, and expanding the use and purchase of alternative
fuel vehicles. Once the Committee reconvenes in the Fall of 1999, it will consider and
report on the feasibility of reducing corporate fleet emissions by 50 percent.
(c) A Green Fleets Committee was convened in December 1997. A Corporate Green Fleets
Strategy Status Report was submitted to the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment Team
(TIE) on June 3, 1998. The report provides information on the steps that are being taken to
develop a corporate green fleet strategy directed at reducing smog causing emissions from
City vehicles and equipment.
Initiatives undertaken by the Corporate Green Fleets Committee which will contribute to
significant cost reductions in the operation of the fleet and reduced emissions include the
following:
(i) Reviewing opportunities for reducing the size of the fleet as a result of
amalgamation: This initiative is in progress.;
(ii) Utilizing bicycles where feasible, in areas such as building and works inspection,
park and police operations: Currently, there are some departments which use
bicycles in their day-to-day operations, including Parks and Recreation (4 bikes);
Animal Control Unit (4 bikes); and the police;
(iii) Continuing driver education and Can-Bike training for employees: Can-Bike training
is available throughout the year for employees;
(iv) Use of natural gas, dual fuel, propane and electric vehicles and equipment currently
in the fleet;
(v) Expanding the use of alternative fuel vehicles through the purchase of new dedicated
natural gas pickups and vans: In the fall of 1998, Fleet Management Services
delivered eight new, natural-gas powered trucks to Works and Emergency Services
and Parks and Recreation. There is an on-going replacement program to replace old
vehicles, as they are decommissioned, with alternative fuel vehicles. Whether a
vehicle is replaced with an alternative fuel one depends on need and availability of
fuel site locations. For example, certain parts of the City have few commercial
gasoline stations that can service natural-gas vehicles;
(vi) Reducing idling of vehicles through the installation of idle timers on approximately
300 vehicles: To date, 350 work vehicles have been installed with idle timers. This
initiative is on-going;
(vii) Emissions testing of gasoline powered vehicles: Please refer to Smog Prevention and
Reduction section for status;
(viii) Utilizing route optimization software in Solid Waste Management: The Solid Waste
Management Department is using route optimization software. This will reduce the
number of vehicles required and their emissions; and
(ix) Participating in the Green Fleets Partnership: The partnership is, composed of
thirteen cities throughout North America, organized and facilitated by the
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). The primary
focus of Green Fleets is greenhouse gas reduction. The project aims to develop
policies and practices that enable municipal leaders and their staff to assess and
implement a variety of measures to reduce local demand for travel and transportation
energy.
The committee's work plan includes, among other things, exploring initiatives in the
following areas:
(i) Including emissions data information requirements in purchasing specifications for
new vehicle purchases: Currently, suppliers must provide emissions data to Fleet
Management Services on vehicles being considered for purchasing;
(ii) Establishing an emissions baseline for vehicles currently in fleet: An emissions
baseline will be developed once the emissions testing is implemented;
(iii) Creating a City bicycle pool for short term work usage by City staff;
(iv) Exploring new technology and vehicles including alternatives to the use of 2-stroke
engines currently used in power mowers and leaf blowers: This research is on-going;
and
(v) Exploring opportunities for increasing the number of natural gas refueling locations
to enable greater use of natural gas vehicles: Fleet Management Services is in
consultation with Enbridge Gas on this issue.
Next Steps - 1999/2000 Work Plan:
(a) Reducing Corporate Fleet Emissions: Once the Corporate Green Fleets Committee
reconvenes in the Fall of 1999, it will consider and report on the feasibility of reducing
corporate fleet emissions by 50 percent.
(b) Feasibility and Cost of Implementing a Green Fleet Strategy: The Corporate Green Fleets
Committee will report to Council on the Green Fleet strategy once it has reconvened in the
Fall of 1999.
2.5 Employee Trip Reduction:
Adopted Recommendations:
(a) Employee Trip Reduction Program: A comprehensive auto trip reduction program
be developed and implemented with the following first steps:
(i) effective December 31, 1997, revise the employee parking policy for City
Hall and all other work locations so that free commuting spaces become pay
for parking, unless free parking is required because of a disability, contractual
obligations, or an occupational health and safety concern; and that the
Parking Authority of Toronto be responsible for the administration of the City
Hall commuter spaces and a system be developed for other sites;
(ii) establish a corporate Clean Air Action Fund with $100,000.00 in seed money
and/or also direct the revenue generated from the paid employee commuter
parking to this fund; upon establishment of the fund, the Anti-smog Working
Group in conjunction with the Healthy City Office report back on projects for
use of this fund such as a pedestrian/bicycle commuter facility in City Hall;
bulk purchase program for TTC and GO Transit passes; and a plan for
telecommuting options, car pooling, variable work hours, a flexible dress
code and transit, walking and bicycling incentives; and
(iii) explore alternative sources of funding such as the Toronto Atmospheric Fund
(TAF) to implement projects that provide incentives for employee trip
reduction.
(b) Survey of Employee Travel: A survey of employee travel (commuting and work
related) patterns be undertaken every two years, to facilitate the assessment of
progress in achieving emission reduction targets and to assist in the development and
achievement of employee trip reduction targets.
Status of Recommendations:
(a) An Employee Trip Reduction Program (ETRP) is being developed in a phased approach by
the Healthy City Office and the Planning Division. The former Municipality of Metropolitan
Toronto Planning Department previously undertook research and analysis for an employee
trip reduction pilot. An ETRP is based on the philosophy of increasing awareness among
employees regarding smog created by automobile emissions, and generating incentives and
disincentives to change the transportation mode chosen in coming to work. Research from
a number of different cities has shown that incentives stimulate reduction of car use and
greater use of public transit, cycling and walking.
There are many studies and reports that provide detailed information and analysis in support
of ETRP. Three such reports include: the "Travel Demand Management Technical
Overview" and the "Short-Term Pro-Transit Report" produced by the former Municipality
of Metropolitan Toronto, and "Commuting in the Greenhouse: Automobile Trip Reduction
Programs For Municipal Employees" produced by the International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). According to these sources, a comprehensive ETRP
contains a mixture of services and incentives including: Ride-Sharing (such as car pooling
and van pooling); Transit Incentives (such as ticket subsidies); Parking Policies (such as the
elimination on free parking for single-occupancy vehicles); Trip Elimination (such as
telecommuting and variable work hours); Bicycle and Pedestrian Incentives; and
Transportation Management Associations. The specific mix of incentives and disincentives
will vary according to a number of factors, including work location/site and individual
employee factors. The employee survey is an important tool in this assessment.
Public Transit Incentives:
The initial phase of this Program will concentrate on the design and implementation of
incentives encouraging employees to use public transit. Discussions with the Toronto Transit
Commission (TTC) indicated a willingness to fully support this Program. The TTC is
offering its existing TTC Annual Metropass Discount Program to employees to stimulate the
reduction in automobile use. This program offers the TTC Metropass on an annual basis,
but with a discount of one month offered to employees who enroll in the Metropass program.
Employees therefore pay for 11 months and receive 12 months of TTC Metropasses.
In order to make this program more attractive to employees, it is proposed that the
mechanism for obtaining and paying for a TTC Annual Metropass be made convenient and
easy. The TTC has offered to be responsible for providing all advertising and marketing
information for this program to City employees, and to distribute Metropasses at centralized
locations easily accessible to employees throughout the City. It is recommended that the
TTC be requested to provide distribution and marketing services related to the TTC Annual
Metropass Discount Program to employees throughout the City of Toronto, as an incentive
to encourage reduction of automobile use.
In discussion with Payroll and Benefits staff of the Finance Department, the process of
payment for purchase of TTC Metropasses via payroll deduction was explored. It is
recommended that City Council approve the use of payroll deduction for payment of TTC
Metropasses for City of Toronto employees, and that the distribution of such information be
implemented and administered by Finance. The ease of this Metropass purchasing process
would create a convenience incentive to employees interested in public transit.
The Tax Status of Employer Provided Transit Benefits:
At present, employer provided income tax-exempt transit passes are not available in Canada.
This means that employer-paid passes to take public transit - the City of Toronto paying for
its employees' Metropasses, for example - becomes a benefit to the employee which is
designated as taxable under the Federal Income Tax Act. Any employee receiving an
employer-paid transit pass will pay income tax on this benefit. The Amalgamated Transit
Union, the Canadian Urban Transit Association, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities
and the TTC, among other organizations, have been advocating a change in the way that the
Federal Government taxes employer-provided transit passes. They are attempting to
convince the Federal government to allow employers to provide their employees with
income-tax exempt transit passes as an incentive to use public transportation. In the United
States, where this benefit is available, transit expenditures among recipients have increased
on average by 23 percent. Such an income tax-free benefit would create a powerful incentive
to employees to switch to using public transit, significantly reducing pollution. It is
recommended that City Council request the Federal government to make employer-provided
transit passes an income tax-exempt benefit for employees.
Parking Policy at the City:
An important component of an ETRP is the parking allowance for City employees. Currently
a number of employees are provided with access to free parking at their work location either
as a function of compensation or because they are deemed to require their car for work
related purposes. It is important to look at parking because studies have shown that the
supply and price of parking play an important role in employees modal choice decisions. The
provision of free parking by an employer is a critical factor in reducing the out-of-pocket cost
of an auto trip, and thus making other modes of commuting, such as transit, less competitive.
Currently, the Facilities and Real Estate Division is drafting a new parking policy for the
City. The policy will consider the related environmental, health and trip reduction issues.
Other ETRP Initiatives:
A Transportation Management Association (TMA) pilot project, facilitated by Urban
Planning and Development Services, will work with employers to promote transit,
ridesharing, telecommuting, cycling and walking as an alternative to the car. The Corporate
Green Fleets Committee will be investigating the opportunities of creating a City bicycle
pool for short term work usage by City staff.
To facilitate the development and implementation of employee trip reduction initiatives a
$50,000.00 Clean Air Action Fund has been established under the Toronto Atmospheric
Fund.
(b) Urban Planning and Development Services with the support of The Healthy City Office is
conducting a survey of employee travel (commuting and work related) patterns for the new
City. Previously, the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Planning Department
conducted a commute travel survey of Metro Hall employees. Amalgamation has resulted
in employee movement to new work locations, and increased employee travel between work
sites. The survey will aid in understanding where people work, how they travel to work, and
how often they travel between work locations. This essential baseline of employee travel
patterns is integral to the design of an effective and relevant ETRP for the City.
Next Steps - 1999/2000 Work Plan:
(a) Employee Trip Reduction Program (ETRP): Subsequent phases of the ETRP will be
developed once the survey of employee travel is completed. The next phases of the ETRP
will address parking allowances for City employees, ridesharing, and telecommuting. Urban
Planning and Development Services and the Healthy City Office will report on the next
phases of the ETRP in early 2000.
(b) Survey of Employee Travel: The survey will be distributed to employees in June 1999.
During July and August 1999 the survey will be coded and analysed.
2.6 Targets, Measuring and Monitoring:
Adopted Recommendations:
(a) Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Targets: Request that the TTC consider and
report on adopting a plan of action for emissions reduction, including a 45 percent
reduction target for NOx and VOCs, and a 25 percent reduction target for particulate
matter emissions, and present the plan to the TTC Commissioners.
(b) Procurement of Green Power: Consider and report on committing to a 1999 target for
purchasing 25 percent of the electricity used in-house by the City of Toronto from
"Green" power sources, such as wind turbines and solar-powered generators; and
challenging private sector companies to commit to the same 1999 target of 25 percent
"Green" electricity purchases.
(c) City Emissions Targets:
(i) City Council adopt a target that surpasses the Provincial target and reduces
corporate nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
emissions by a minimum of 45 per cent, from 1995 to 2005; this reduction be
designed to reduce Smog Episode Days from a record high in 1995 of 11 bad
air days in Toronto (the highest recorded number in Canada), to two or less
Smog Episode Days in 2005.
(ii) that the City of Toronto adopt a city-wide target to reduce NOx and VOCs
emissions across the city by a minimum of 45 percent from 1995 to 2005.
(iii) that the City of Toronto adopt a city-wide target to reduce Smog Episode
Days from a record high in 1995 of 11 to two or fewer Smog Episode Days
in 2005.
(d) Monitoring Economic Benefits: A plan be developed to monitor the economic
benefits accrued as a result of implementing the clean air actions recommended in
this report.
(e) Monitoring Emissions Reductions: A program to monitor emissions reductions that
accrue as the result of the City of Toronto's initiatives be commissioned and other
actions be identified that will facilitate the city in meeting its reduction targets.
(f) Annual Anti-Smog Report: That the City of Toronto produce an annual Anti-Smog
report detailing:
(i) Progress on achievement of the targets;
(ii) Steps taken to implement the Blueprint; and
(iii) Recommendations for future actions.
Status of Recommendations:
(a) A copy of the recommendations adopted by City Council at its meeting held on May 13 and
14, 1998 were forwarded the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) on May 21, 1998. The
TTC's strategy to deal with smog is to promote public transit use. According to the TTC the
proposed targets may be difficult to meet because increased ridership increases the number
of buses in circulation, which translates to more emissions. In order to reduce their
emissions, the TTC currently has 125 alternative fuel buses in service, which run on
compressed natural gas (CNG) instead of diesel. The 125 CNG buses is the maximum
number the TTC can operate given the current alternative fuel infrastructure at the TTC.
Also, the TTC is implementing an in-house vehicle emissions testing program, and has
developed a compliance plan to implement the Provincial Drive Clean Program for its fleet.
(b) Currently, the Environmental Task Force's (ETF) Sustainable Energy Use Work Group is
developing a Sustainable Energy Use Plan for the City that will guide decision-making and
policy development on energy use for the City; and help move the City from its dependence
on fossil fuels to alternative green energy sources such as wind and solar power. This
process being carried out by a multi-sectoral work group that includes representation from
residents, community/environmental groups, utilities, independent power producers, and city
staff. The Plan will be integrated into the Environmental Plan being developed by the
Environmental Task Force for the new City. The Environmental Plan will be presented to
City Council early in 2000.
Research into available green power sources suggest that achieving a purchasing target of
25 percent of the electricity used in-house by the City of Toronto from green power sources
is unfeasible at this time. According to senior members of the Sustainable Energy Use
Working Group, using the EcoLogo definition of renewable energy (which excludes
electricity generated from Niagara Falls), the grid presently does not have the capacity to
provide 25 percent of renewable energy. In terms of the availability of renewable energy, not
only is there a shortage of suppliers, but also the current low price of energy in Ontario (due
to a heavily subsidized nuclear sector, and inexpensive fossil fuel-based energy generation)
has created a market where higher priced renewable energy cannot compete. However, this
situation is slowly changing. The passing of Bill 35, the Energy Competition Act, by the
Provincial Government may provide the market conditions necessary to encourage the
development of renewable energies. In addition, the City is supporting local renewable
energy projects such as the work of the Toronto Renewable Energy Co-operative (TREC)
and the TREC Windpower Co-op (WPC). TREC is planning to build a 660 kW wind turbine
on Toronto's waterfront. The value of the TREC wind turbine is not only the energy it will
generate, but also the awareness it is bringing about on sustainable energy issues.
The Sustainable Energy Use Plan for the City being developed by the Environmental Task
Force's (ETF) Sustainable Energy Use Work Group will report on the availability of green
power sources, renewable energy targets, and demand and supply-side options for the City.
The report will be completed during the summer of 1999.
(c) City Council adopted all of the above noted City Emissions Targets.
(d) Works and Emergency Services with financial support from the Toronto Atmospheric Fund
(TAF) is in the initial stages of setting up a centralized database that will quantify and
monitor municipal and corporate greenhouse gas and air pollution emissions and emission
reductions in the new City of Toronto. The development of a centralized emissions database,
housed in the City, will support the quantification of the City's achievements in smog
reduction; allow the City to track its progress in meeting its adopted smog and CO2 reduction
targets; help develop sustainable air quality policies; and provide the information needed to
investigate the potential for carbon trading at the City. The TAF Board of Directors has
approved $25,000.00 to cover the cost of software and its installation, and to provide training
and technical support for City staff involved in the project. The Technical Services Division
will provide a staff resource for the implementation of the database and application models
and data collection. Staff training to carry out this project will begin in the spring of 1999.
The setting up of a centralized database to track greenhouse gas emissions and emissions
reduction complements the goals of the Partners for Climate Protection Program (PCP), a
joint initiative of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and
the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). The goal of the program is to help
municipalities prepare and implement local climate action plans to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. To become part of the program a municipality is asked to make a public
commitment, in the form of a resolution, to reduce 1990 levels of greenhouse gas emission
in municipal operation by 20 percent within ten years of joining the program. Once
members, municipalities follow a five milestone process for achieving tangible reductions
of local greenhouse gas emissions. The five milestones include: (1) undertaking an inventory
of energy use and emissions; (2) setting reduction target(s); (3) developing a local action
plan; (4) implementation of the plan; and (5) monitoring and evaluating the success of
reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The former City of Toronto and the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto were both
members of the FCM 20 percent Club (the FCM 20 percent Club recently joined with
ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection Campaign to form the existing Partners for Climate
Protection Program). It is recommended that the new City of Toronto become a member of
the PCP program in order to help the City monitor its progress in meeting its adopted
greenhouse targets, aid in the development of greenhouse gas emissions database, and to
assist in learning from the experience of other cities.
(e) Anti-Smog Report: This report responds to the request for an anti-smog status report.
Next Steps - 1999 Work Plan:
(a) Monitoring Economic Benefits: The Healthy City Office will report in the fall of 1999 on a
process for reporting on the State of the City. This will include a mechanism to monitor the
environmental, social, and economic impacts of City initiatives.
2.7 Inter-governmental Relations:
Adopted Recommendations:
(a) Ontario Hydro - Lakeview Generating Station: Ontario Hydro be requested to adopt
emergency measures which would provide for the reduction of power generation at
the Lakeview Generating Station during smog alert days;
(b) Federal Ministry of the Environment: The Federal Minister of the Environment be
requested to meet with City Officials to discuss collaborative efforts to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions;
(c) Board of Health: City Council endorse the actions of the Board of Health in
expressing to the Government of Canada its serious concern with Canada's predicted
failure to fulfill its international commitment to stabilize carbon dioxide emissions
at their 1990 levels by the year 2000;
(d) Board of Health: City Council endorse the actions of the Board of Health in
requesting the Government of Canada to commit to a 20 percent reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by the year 2005; conduct a
comprehensive baseline study of Federal taxes, grants and subsidies which impact
on that commitment, and develop and implement the regulatory framework, tax
policies and incentive programs necessary to achieve that goal;
(e) Board of Health: City Council endorse the actions of the Board of Health in
requesting the Province of Ontario to commit to a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse
gas emissions from 1990 by the year 2005; examine the policies, regulations,
subsidies and incentives that impact on that commitment; and develop and
implement the planning policies, tax incentives, subsidies and regulations necessary
to achieve that goal; and
(f) Trans-boundary Air Pollution: The Chief Administrative Officer report to City
Council by June 1998, on participating in the "ozone transport rulemaking" process
by EPA through a petition under section 126 of the Clean Air Act and/or through the
"international intervention" section of the Act.
Status of Recommendations:
(a) Council's request was not forwarded to Ontario Hydro.
Coal-fired generating stations are major sources of smog, acid rain, greenhouse gases and
toxins such as mercury. The Lakeview Generating Station's impact on air quality has been
documented in a number of reports produced by Public Health.
On December 15, 1998, a consortium composed of CU Power, Hydro Mississauga, Ontario
Hydro and Toronto Hydro announced the signing of a joint venture agreement to pursue the
development of a natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant at the Lakeview Generating
Station site. The first phase involves conducting a feasibility study of environmental impacts
and economic benefits. Should this phase produce promising results, the next step would
include detailed design and engineering leading to regulatory approval. Project scheduling
calls for the gas-fired turbines to be fully operational in the latter half of 2002.
The consortium's commitment to pursue the development a gas-fired generator at the
Lakeview Generating Station site has the potential to improve air quality. Natural gas is a
cleaner burning fuel than coal. It releases no sulphur dioxide, no mercury, and none of the
toxic particulates associated with coal. It also releases much less carbon dioxide and far
fewer nitrogen oxides than does coal. It has not yet been determined by the consortium if the
gas-fired generator will be developed as an addition to the coal-fired generator at the
Lakeview Generating Station or as a replacement for it. If the gas-fired generator is added
to the coal-fired generator at Lakeview, air emissions from the plant could increase in the
future. If however, the gas-fired generator is built as a replacement for the coal-fired
generator, air emissions could decrease in the future.
The issue of peak demand electricity requirements and increased Lakeview emissions again
raises the issue of the facilities' impact on smog alert days. While it is true that the Lakeview
Generating Station contributes to smog, its operation is often needed during smog episodes
to meet the increase in power demand that results from the increased use of air conditioners
in the City of Toronto during smog episodes. In the short term, it is recommended that
Ontario Hydro be requested to investigate emergency measures which would provide for the
reduction of power generation at Lakeview during smog alert days. In the long term, it may
be fruitful to pursue a strategy which includes conversion of the Lakeview Generating
Stations to natural gas, the development of renewable energies an co-generated electricity,
and greater conservation of energy throughout the City.
(b) A copy of the recommendations adopted by City Council at its meeting held on May 13 and
14, 1998 was sent to Federal Minister of the Environment on May 21, 1998. To date, the
City has not received a response to the May 21, 1998 communication. While the City has
not met the Federal Minister, City of Toronto staff represent the City on a number of the
fifteen national Issue Tables that were set up to examine the consequences of the Kyoto
Protocol and the options open to Canada for implementing the Protocol. As part of the
Kyoto Protocol, signed in December 1997, Canada has agreed to reduce its emissions of six
greenhouse gases by six percent of 1990 levels by 2010. Issue Tables provide expert and
detailed input to the analysis, identification and assessment of greenhouse gas reduction
opportunities, and aid in the development of Canada's national implementation strategy.
Currently, the City has representation on the Transportation and Municipalities Issue Tables.
In addition, senior level Federal Government staff participate in the Environmental Task
Force, and the work groups on sustainable energy and sustainable transportation.
(c) City Council endorsed the actions of the Board of Health. A copy of the recommendations
adopted by City Council at its meeting held on May 13 and 14, 1998 were forwarded to the
Federal Minister of the Environment on May 21, 1998.
(d) City Council endorsed the actions of the Board of Health. A copy of the recommendations
adopted by City Council at its meeting held on May 13 and 14, 1998 were forwarded to the
Provincial Minister of the Environment on May 21, 1998.
(e) City Council endorsed the actions of the Board of Health. A copy of the recommendations
adopted by City Council at this meeting held on May 13 and 14, 1998 were forwarded to the
Federal Minister of the Environment on May 21, 1998.
(f) The "ozone rulemaking process" refers to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) intent to revise National Ambient Air Quality Standards for both particulate
matter and ground level ozone. This regulatory action was announced in November 1996.
In March 1997, the Province of Ontario filed submissions with the EPA in respect to
proposed new air quality standards. The submission emphasized the concern that air quality
in Ontario is directly affected by transboundary movement of pollutants emitted in the United
States. It is estimated that 50 percent of the smog over the province originates from the
United States.
The former City of Toronto Council at its meeting of October 6 and 7, 1997 adopted a report
from the City Solicitor on the issue of transboundary air pollution (September 19,1997). The
report determined that due to constitutional restrictions the City had a limited ability to take
direct and/or independent legal action in respect of transboundary air pollution control. And
that since both the Provincial and Federal governments monitor the transboundary movement
of pollutants emitted in the United States, it was recommended that the City and the Province
share their resources and work together to develop and implement strategies to control and
abate transboundary air pollution. To date, there has been no cooperation between the City
and the Province. On February 19, 1999 Premier Mike Harris announced that Ontario will
intervene in support of a EPA ruling requiring 22 American states and the District of
Columbia to reduce transboundary air pollution by May, 2003.
It is recommended that the Chief Administrative Officer explore with Federal and Provincial
officials ways and means available to ensure that transboundary air pollution issues affecting
the City are addressed.
Next Steps - 1999/2000 Work Plan:
(a) - (d) Council ensure that the issues highlighted in this report form part of the
inter-governmental agenda for the City of Toronto in its involvement with the
Greater Toronto Services Board, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the
Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and other related forums.
(3) Conclusions:
The smog reduction recommendations adopted by City Council present an ambitious set of
targets and initiatives. This report presents an update of activities already underway and
outlines a Work Plan to deal with smog for 1999 - 2000.
A review on the status of adopted anti-smog recommendations demonstrates that the City has
responded with many actions which are, and will, contribute to smog reduction in the City.
The work that is currently underway represents the first steps in an on-going process to deal
with the sources of smog both within the Corporation and the City. The implementation of
existing anti-recommendations will also spawn opportunities to expand and build new
initiatives.
There is now an opportunity for the City to demonstrate its leadership and commitment as
a corporation in taking urgent action against smog by committing to the on-going process of
smog reduction. The City is in a unique position to play a proactive and leading role, and to
create opportunities for City employees to contribute directly through their own practices
towards reducing smog. Toronto can be a role model for cities and corporations in Canada
and the world.
(4) Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the appropriate departments, under the coordination of the Toronto
Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team, explore opportunities for funding from
the National Climate Change Fund to assist the City in meeting its smog reduction
targets;
(2) City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to provide distribution and
marketing services for the TTC Annual Metropass Discount Program to City of
Toronto employees as an incentive to encourage reduction of employee automobile
use;
(3) City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission and the Finance Department
to make TTC Metropasses available to City employees using a monthly payroll
deduction program;
(4) in support of this Employee Trip Reduction Program, City Council actively request
that the Federal Minister of Finance make employer-provided transit passes an
income tax-exempt benefit for employees;
(5) the City join the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI)
and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Partners for Climate Protection
Program (PCP) in order to help the City monitor its progress in meeting its adopted
greenhouse gas targets;
(6) the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services and the Chief Administrative
Officer, as the co-chairs of the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment (TIE) Team,
report annually on the City's progress in achieving the milestones of the Partners for
Climate Protection Program (PCP);
(7) City Council endorse, in principle, the installation of the proposed natural gas
capacity at the Lakeview Generating Station with the intention of an eventual full
conversion from coal to natural gas;
(8) City Council request Ontario Hydro to adopt emergency measures which would
provide for the reduction of power generation at the Lakeview Generating Station
during smog alert days;
(9) the Chief Administrative Officer explore with Federal and Provincial officials ways
and means available to ensure that transboundary air pollution issues affecting the
City are addressed; and
(10) the appropriate City staff be authorized and directed to take necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Appendix 1: 1999 - 2000 Work Plan Summary
The following outlines the 1999 - 2000 work plan for the recommendations which have yet to be
acted upon. The work plan has been agreed to by all the identified departments.
What is to be achieved |
Timelines |
Responsibility |
Development of a city-wide public education
campaign on smog and smog alert response
plan for the 2000 smog season. This process
will also assess the feasibility of an Air Quality
Advice Line. |
Report in early
2000 |
Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment
(TIE) Team Smog Reduction Work Group |
Investigate and report on the feasibility of road
closures during smog alert days |
Report by June
1999 |
Works and Emergency Services |
Work with the TTC and Go Transit in
developing a contingency transportation plan
during smog alert days. |
Report by June
1999 |
Works and Emergency Services |
For the 1999 Smog season distribute
educational material on smog to residents. |
Spring/Summer
1999 |
Healthy City Office and Public Health |
Study the feasibility of reducing fleet emissions
by 50 percent. |
Fall 1999- early
2000 |
Corporate Green Fleets Committee |
Report on the feasibility and cost of
implementing a Green Fleet Strategy for the
Corporation. |
Fall 1999 -
early 2000 |
Corporate Green Fleets Committee |
Conduct a survey of employee travel for the
Corporation |
Spring/Summer
1999 |
Healthy City Office and Urban Planning
and Development Services |
Develop next phases of an employee trip
reduction program for the Corporation. |
Report in early
2000 |
Healthy City Office and Urban Planning
and Development Services |
Report on the feasibility of committing to
purchasing 25 percent of electricity used-in
house by the City of Toronto from green power
sources. |
Summer of
1999 |
Environmental Task Force's Sustainable
Energy Use Group |
Report on a mechanism to monitor the
environmental, social, and economic impacts of
City initiatives. |
Fall 1999
|
Healthy City Office |
Annual Anti-Smog Report |
Annual |
Healthy City Office |
City Council ensure that the issues highlighted
in this report form part of the
intergovernmental agenda for the City of
Toronto in its involvement with the Greater
Services Board, Association of Municipalities
of Ontario, the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities, and other related forums. |
On-going |
|
--------
Appendix 2: Blueprint For Action - Smog Reduction In Toronto
(A) Smog Alert Response:
That the City of Toronto initiate and implement a City-wide Smog Alert Response Plan,
activated by the Medical Officer of Health, to come into effect when the Provincial Air
Quality Index (AQI)* is predicted to reach a level of 50, starting in the spring of 1998.
This plan is to be implemented over a two year period in partnership with major employers,
businesses, other levels of government, community groups, and individuals. Activities to be
considered for suspension or curtailment include:
(i) all non-emergency vehicle use;
(ii) idling engines;
(iii) gasoline pump throughput;
(iv) road resurfacing and paving of any kind;
(v) incineration, including the main Sewage Treatment Plant and all hospital incinerators;
(vi) use of Lakeview generating station;
(vii) use of gas powered two-stroke equipment (mowing, trimming, leaf blowing etc.);
(viii) pesticide spraying;
(ix) air conditioning (turn off or reduce, both in buildings and in cars) as well as other
appliances and equipment;
(xi) lights and computers;
(xii) requirement for formal office attire;
(xiii) use of oil-based paints, cleaners, and solvents, including solvent based personal care
products such as hair spray, nail polish and remover; and
(xiv) barbequing.
Activities to support the smog response plan should include:
(a) a comprehensive Smog Alert Response communications procedure.
(b) special care for the especially vulnerable, including:
(i) mechanisms to care for the home bound and other elderly or disabled clients;
(ii) activities and information to reduce the effects of smog on children through Day Care
Centres, Day Camps, and Summer Schools, and through school curricula;
(iii) policies and legislation which provide opportunities for people with respiratory
problems to stay home or to be provided with oxygen, and for outside workers to
reduce workloads on smog days; and
(iv) information for those who are physically active outdoors.
(c) A mandatory Smog Alert Response Plan by all employers, to include:
(i) information and education to employees;
(ii) financial and other assistance for employees, including provision of alternative
transportation options, compensation for workers displaced on smog days, and care
for the especially vulnerable; and
(iii) curtailment of motorized fleets, energy use, industrial emissions, and other
smog-producing activities.
(B) Smog Prevention and Reduction Program:
That the City of Toronto initiate and implement, with partners, a comprehensive smog
prevention program. The following is a list of policies and strategies that can be used to build
such a program. The Expanded Anti-Smog Working Group will make recommendations on
the implementation of the appropriate combination of actions required to achieve the targets.
(i) Transportation and Land Use:
(a) Provide Enhanced Human Powered Transportation Options: Significantly
increase provision of and investment in pedestrian, cycling, blading, and
other human powered* transport options and infrastructure, including
sidewalks, on-street and off-road bike lanes, destination point facilities such
as bike parking, showers, and repair stations, as well as programs to increase
safety, and programs that promote and integrate walking and bicycle
transportation options*. (City report "Bicycle City 2001"*)
(b) Provide Enhanced Transit Options: Significantly expand provision of and
investment in transit, rail, mixed mode*, and other public transit options and
infrastructure.
(c) Land Use and Other Policy Incentives: Support and adopt pedestrian, bicycle,
and transit supportive land use policies and practices aimed at decreasing the
amount of land dedicated to automobile transportation from the current
40 percent+, and at promoting denser, mixed use* communities, including
mixed-use zoning*, traffic calming initiatives, car-free zones. Minimize car
use through amended parking policies (availability, pricing), speed reduction
policies, and traffic demand management requirements.
(d) Parking: Adopt parking policies and practices which stimulate car use
reduction: eliminate requirements for paved parking spaces at residences or
for added second units; reduce the number of parking spaces required for
low-rise apartment or rooming houses; increase permit fees for a second car
in each family; require one tree planted for every parking space; restrict front
yard parking; encourage paid employee parking or reduction of employee
parking; reduce the amount of land given over to parking.
(e) Provide Car Pooling and Car Sharing Options: Support and invest in car
pooling and car sharing policies and initiatives, including High Occupancy
Vehicle (HOV) lanes and computerized trip reduction scheduling systems,
where transit is not available.
(f) Provide Alternative Work Options: Support and invest in alternative work
options such as telecommuting, video conferencing, flextime, four day work
weeks, and flexible dress code.
(g) Provide Alternative Movement of Goods and Services: Support and invest
in the development of alternative distribution and freight options, including
human powered delivery and distribution mechanisms such as work bikes,
bike trailers and couriers; night deliveries and other route optimization
mechanisms; and electronic means of moving information and services.
(h) Provide Green Tourism* Options: Provide and invest in transit and
non-motorized transportation links and information for tourists.
(i) Green Fleets and Employee Trip Reduction: Support and invest in the
greening of all Toronto fleets using City of Toronto practices and recent
"Catching Your Breath" Corporate policies as a starting point. All employers
would submit a corporate green fleets plan, in partnership with the Green
Fleets Partnership, as well as an employee trip reduction plan.
(j) Emissions Controls: Provide legislation and/or increased enforcement of:
mandatory vehicle emissions testing; regulations that prohibit tampering with
emission control devices; diesel truck maintenance; use of reformulated
"summer fuels" during the non-winter months for all gasoline powered
vehicles; research on and regulations regarding emissions from public air
exhibitions and automobile races; a mandatory vapour recovery program; and
where effective, research, development, and application of alternative fuels
and alternative vehicles*.
(k) Financial Incentives: Provide financial and tax incentives to decrease car use
and adopt other modes, including: making transit and bike repair tax
deductible; providing tax incentives for not owning a car; providing property
tax incentives for locating in denser, mixed use locations; adopting
purchasing and leasing policies that encourage purchase of cleaner fuels,
vehicles, and systems; extension of the eight-cylinder vehicle tax* to sport
utility vehicles; providing loans and assistance programs for small businesses
and individuals to initiate modal shift; providing a "cash for clunkers"
program; providing employee incentives and benefits (cash, lieu time, transit
pass subsidies, guaranteed rides home) for not using a car; reviewing tax
policies related to benefits and depreciation rates of company cars; and
providing savings and discounts to "green tourists" who choose other modes.
In addition, channel revenues from the following into smog reducing
activities and programs: permit parking; parking meter revenues; increased
parking fees; gasoline surcharges; automobile registration fees; ownership
levies; polluter fines; voluntary contributions of a percentage of corporate
sales or profits; highway and other tolls and road pricing; and mandatory
vehicle emissions testing.
(ii) Energy Use Reduction
(a) Invest in, develop, and apply energy management systems for industrial
infrastructure. Support cleaner energy systems and conservation initiatives
such as district heating and cooling (including deep lake water cooling*),
cogeneration, renewable energy sources, and more efficient industrial
processes. Continue to invest in the Better Buildings Partnership, a program
for retrofits* of public sector, private sector, and non-profit buildings,
currently managed by the Energy Efficiency Office. Expand the partnership
to include retrofitting of residential buildings.
(b) Reduce residential energy and hot water consumption in the following ways:
(i) provide and promote home energy assessments by investing in and
expanding on current Greensaver* and local government initiatives;
(ii) provide a comprehensive home energy practices assistance program;
(iii) provide the ability to finance residential energy retrofits* paid back
through utility bills; and
(iv) support, promote, and invest in research, development, and
application of new and innovative energy options such as residential
solar energy projects and support net billing structures and other
mechanisms to facilitate financing.
(c) Adopt and/or support legislation and incentives that encourage energy
savings and reduce the "Urban Heat Island Effect*" including:
(i) increase energy efficiency standards currently required in the Energy
Efficiency and Conservation Plan for new construction to offset
deficiencies in the Ontario Building Code;
(ii) assess and restrict demolition of buildings and especially surrounding
trees in keeping with energy conservation goals;
(iii) advocate energy efficient buildings through a labelling program,
which rates buildings according to level of energy
efficiency/conservation for use at resale*;
(iv) increase the balance of light toned buildings and white rooftops with
darker ones through the Building Code, as well as lighter pavements,
strategic tree planting and replacement requirements, and prohibition
of tree removal, to reduce the "Urban Heat Island Effect*" during the
summer, and to conserve heat during the winter;
(v) legislate and provide incentives for developers to create compact
mixed use communities to reduce energy use;
(vi) legislate "turn off" or "turn down" in office towers at night (lights,
computers, and air conditioners) and reduction during the day;
(vii) provide incentives/legislation encouraging a shift from gas or electric
to push mowers; and
(viii) phase in a ban of two-stroke motors* in conjunction with financial
incentives such as rebates, and schedule to accelerate replacement of
old equipment with low emission equipment.
(d) Shift Toronto to cleaner energy demand and use. Advocate that the percentage of
Toronto's energy drawn from renewable sources be increased to 25 percent, and that
generation from nuclear and fossil fuels be reduced by 50 percent to be carried out
in the following ways:
(i) reduction of demand through conservation;
(ii) purchase and use of alternative sources; and
(iii) reduction and phase down of current fossil fuel sources, including request
that Lakeview Generating Station not increase its annual supply to Toronto
over 1996 figures, and that in tandem with increased conservation
commitments and purchase of alternative sources, Lakeview be considered
for phase-down over the next decade.
(c) Greening:
(a) Phase out cosmetic* use of pesticides over a two year period. In the
meantime, restrict spraying to specific hours, avoiding times when
children are outside - before and after school hours, weekends, public
holidays, July, and August. Research and invest in environmentally
sensitive methods of control.
(b) Reduce the "Urban Heat Island Effect*" through investment in
initiatives such as urban agriculture, rooftop gardening, and strategic
tree planting such as shade trees in car parking lots, on streets, and
surrounding buildings. Initiate new smog-specific greening on road
right of ways, cycling and pedestrian corridors, parks and other public
land, private property (homes and businesses) and rail corridors.
(c) Increase the percentage of land given to green space, by strengthening
and investing in existing greening programs and activities, including
river and marsh restoration, parking lots into parks initiatives and
green tourism initiatives*.
(d) Legislate and facilitate home, commercial and community greening
initiatives through by-laws, policies and targets to increase green
space, in tandem with financial incentives and assistance for greening
activities, for example mandatory tree replacement policies, relaxing
parking space requirements in favour of greening activities, and
provision of rebates, discounts, and tax breaks related to greening
initiatives.
(iv) Industrial/Commercial Source Reduction
(a) Legislate and negotiate stricter pollution controls and prohibitions,
locally and internationally, including biomedical waste incineration,
sewage sludge incineration, use of oil based paints and other toxic
solvents by individuals, businesses (in particular auto body shops)
and other institutions, production and disposal of plastics, and
emission of Perc* by dry cleaners.
(b) Require and facilitate replacement of polluting industrial systems
with cleaner technologies and systems, for example cogeneration
systems, alternative dry cleaning systems, wild reed beds* living
machine technology*, and low VOCs* solvents and paints. Include
technical and financial assistance programs (in particular for small
businesses) for decreasing toxic chemical use and discharges. Invest
in research and development of cleaner systems.
(c) Legislate and facilitate public awareness of industrial and commercial
pollution and solutions, including: making emission levels and
monitoring results for Ontario industrial stationary sources available
to the public; publishing names and locations of all companies
emitting hazardous substances, along with complete lists of the
contaminants emitted; publishing names of companies engaged in
greening, upgrading, or replacement of polluting systems; initiating
industrial partnerships to facilitate and finance new options;
providing for increased public consultation when Certificates of
Approval* are being considered for new industrial sources.
(v) Research
Monitor, and where necessary initiate and / or participate in research on:
(i) the health impacts of particulates, with the aim of developing a target
for particulates reduction;
(ii) the social, economic, and health impacts of smog;
(iii) the relative impact of smog levels in different parts of Toronto;
(iv) the relative impact of policies, programs, and other initiatives on
smog in Toronto;
(v) financial incentives required to promote positive behaviour;
(vi) less polluting freight and distribution systems for commerce in the
Greater Toronto Area;
(vii) new and improved technologies to assist with smog reduction;
(viii) travel patterns in the GTA;
(ix) methodologies to improve the prediction of smog;
(x) cleaner fuels, vehicles, and systems; and
(xi) cross-border production and reduction of smog sources.
(C) Public Education and Communication
That the City of Toronto initiate and implement, in partnership, a two-part comprehensive
education and awareness program as follows:
(a) Part One: Smog Alert Notification Procedure, including:
(i) smog alert notification 12-18 hours prior to a predicted smog episode,
directed, in all key languages, to the public, large employers, point source
emitters*, transit providers, schools and boards of education, hospitals,
media, and other relevant groups. This notification should also include a list
of activities to be suspended or curtailed; and
(ii) an ongoing smog outreach program in all key languages providing
information on recognizing the potential health effects of smog, activities to
avoid for health reasons, and on actions that reduce smog. Channels should
include: a smog alert hotline and telephone outreach program; pre-season
household door-to-door bulletins; mainstream and community media and
Public Service Announcements; videos; community outreach and public
events; and corporate and community partners' channels. The program
should be launched at the beginning of the smog season to give advance
warning of what to expect and how to prepare.
(b) Part Two: Ongoing Education and Awareness Program, including education which
would occur regularly and in all key languages, with particular emphasis during the
smog season. Information should encourage ongoing action to help prevent and
reduce smog, including:
(i) what smog is, its costs and harmful effects and how to prepare for smog days;
everyday actions to reduce smog; exemplary practices from Toronto and
elsewhere; targeted communications to polluters and businesses being
requested or required to curtail certain activities; what the City and other
partners are doing to reduce smog; where to get information and resources on
smog and anti-smog actions.
Communication Channels Include: community and mainstream media, and
public service announcements; distribution of public notices and materials
(door to door, pay and cheque stubs etc); electronic communication
mechanisms (Internet); schools and other academic institutions, workplaces,
places of worship, community centres, environmental groups and resource
centres; special events; educational curriculum at all levels and incorporation
into existing professional and other training channels; targeted (and/or
mandatory) communication, education, and training for polluters.
(D) Commitment:
That the City of Toronto lead in the commitment to anti-smog action in partnership with
major employers, businesses, other levels of government, community groups and individuals,
as well as with relevant international agencies in the following ways:
(a) Commitment to Developing and Implementing Anti-Smog Plans: Accelerate the
development and implementation of municipal, Provincial, Federal, corporate, and
community anti-smog action plans.
(b) Commitment of Financial Resources: Commit financial resources to the
implementation of actions recommended in these plans, to be derived from the
following sources:
(i) creation of stable, ongoing clean air funds as a percentage of public
(government) energy, transportation environment budgets; as a percentage of
corporate sales; and as a commitment to anti-smog efforts by major funding
agencies;
(ii) channeling of revenues generated from savings derived from anti-smog
actions into further anti-smog actions, for example, dedicating energy savings
to employee benefits such as subsidizing transit passes or providing
workplace bicycle and walking facilities;
(iii) channelling revenues derived from redirecting subsidies to the automobile
into anti-smog actions (leveling the playing field);
(iv) channelling of revenues generated from polluting activities into anti-smog
actions, for example channelling parking revenues or polluter fines into
providing transit options and green space; or channelling personal savings
from shifting modes into a home energy retrofit, or into buying a new bicycle;
and
(v) contribution of services and goods in-kind through partnership and
co-operative anti-smog efforts.
(c) Commitment of Human Resources: Commit human resources to the development
and co-ordination of anti-smog efforts, including paid staff, volunteers, and citizen
committees. Support these commitments with adequate financial, administrative, and
information resources.
--------
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following report
(June 1, 1999) from Councillor Jack Layton, Don River, Ward 25:
That the following recommendations be adopted in addition to the Chief Administrative Officer's
report:
(1) that the City immediately institute enforcement of the Anti-Idling Bylaw using a Part 3
Summons technique and that this enforcement be intensified during Smog Days;
(2) that the City Solicitor report directly to Council on June 9, 1999, on the status of the
application for the "set fine" for the Anti Idling Bylaw which was approved unanimously by
City Council early last year;
(3) that staff initiate car pooling at all of the former City Hall locations for Summer 1999, in
consultation with the Toronto Environmental Alliance which has experience in helping many
large institutions develop and instigate car pooling plans;
(4) that staff be directed to immediately implement an employee parking policy for City Hall and
all other work locations so that free commuting spaces become pay for parking, unless free
parking is required because of a disability, contractural obligations, or an occupational health
and safety concern; and that the Parking Authority of Toronto be responsible for the
administration of the City Hall commuter spaces and a system be developed for other sites;
(5) that existing City of Toronto materials that have been developed by Toronto Public Health
on how children, the elderly and people with lung and heart conditions can deal with smog
days be distributed to the public, possibly via doctors offices in conjunction with the Ontario
Medical Association; and that the Chief Administrative Officer and Budget Committee
report directly to Council on the funds required to and the source of the funds;
Background:
Recommendation No. (1):
In September 1998, City Council passed an Anti-Idling Bylaw. Recommendation No. 1 calls on the
enforcement of this bylaw to be stepped up during Smog Days.
Recommendation No. (2):
This calls on the City Solicitor to report on what the status of the application for a "set fine" usually
made to the Attorney General of Ontario to allow bylaw infractions to be paid in a manner similar
to parking fines.
Recommendation No. (3):
Over 10 large institutions such as IBM, Sprint Canada, Toronto Hydro and Ontario have instigated
employee car pool programs, with the help of the TEA. TEA is willing to help the City establish
employee car pool programs this summer at former city halls.
Recommendation No. (4):
As part of the Smog Reduction Program passed by City Council on May 13 and 14,
Recommendation No. (17) called for the Chief Administrative Officer to write a status report and
an implementation plan to City Council by June 1998 on the following:
"A comprehensive auto trip reduction program be developed and implemented with the
following first steps:
(a) effective December 31, 1997, revise the employee parking policy for City Hall and
all other work locations so that free commuting spaces become pay for parking,
unless free parking is required because of a disability, contractual obligations, or an
occupational health and safety concern; and that the Parking Authority of Toronto be
responsible for the administration of the City Hall commuter spaces and a system be
developed for other sites;
Recommendation No. (4) calls on City Staff to implement a policy already passed by City Council.
Recommendation No. (5):
Toronto Public Health has produced excellent fact sheets on what children, the elderly and people
with lung and heart conditions can do on smog alert days. In the right hands, this information can
save lives this summer. To ensure it gets to the right hands, the City can work with the Ontario
Medical Association and distribute the fact sheets to as many doctors offices in the City of Toronto
as possible.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following report
(May 31, 1999) from Councillor Jack Layton, Don River, Ward 25:
On May 28, 1999, the Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons adopted the
following motion and asks that the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee consider it as part of
the discussions on Item No. 3, "Smog Prevention and Reduction: Status Report and Work Plan" on
the June 1, 1999 agenda.
It is recommended that Toronto Public Health develop and implement a comprehensive, season-long
hot weather and air quality strategy. Further, that the target population include those at risk such as
seniors, homeless, underhoused, inner city poor, persons with chronic illness and persons using
psychotropic medications that increase sensitivity to sunburn. The strategy should include the
following:
(a) access to basic resources such as water, sun screen and hats;
(b) access to public facilities where individuals can seek cool shelter;
(c) a "no movement" policy for public parks and shaded areas;
(d) information on location of cool shelters and other available resources through existing
networks; and
(e) fact sheets that would include information on health conditions that can be exacerbated by
heat.
--------
The following persons appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee in connection
with the foregoing matter:
- Mr. John Wellner, Toronto Environmental Alliance, and filed a series of articles appearing
in the Toronto Star in regard thereto; and
- Councillor Jack Layton, Don River.
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing
Clause, the following report (June 7, 1999) from the Chief Administrative Officer:
Purpose:
To report on the feasibility of additional anti-smog recommendations, embodied in the
communication (June 1, 1999), put forward by Councillor Jack Layton at the June 1, 1999 Strategic
Policy and Priorities Committee.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
With regards to item (5), funds required to produce and disseminate public education materials for
the summer of 1999 will be absorbed within the Healthy City Office and Toronto Public Health
budgets. Implications for future years will be reported through the 2000 budget process.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) That the Commissioner of Corporate Services ensure that carpooling is coordinated through
the City's existing intranet site on an on-going basis; and
(2) That the Chief Administrative Officer and the Commissioner of Corporate Services develop
and implement the promotional and employee awareness initiative set out in this report.
Council Reference:
At its June 1st, 1999 meeting, the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee (SPPC) adopted the
report, 'Smog Prevention and Reduction: Status Report and Work Plan' (May 18, 1999) from the
Chief Administrative Officer. At that time, Councillor Jack Layton put forward five additional
recommendations to deal with smog this summer. These included:
(1) that the City immediately institute enforcement of the Anti-Idling Bylaw using a Part 3
Summons technique and that this enforcement be intensified during Smog Days.
(2) that the City Solicitor report directly to Council of June 9, 1999:
(21) on the status of the application for the "set fine" for the Anti Idling By-Law which
was approved unanimously by City Council early last year; and
(22) on the clause from the Municipal Act p.65, Part VII General provisions applicable
to all Municipalities Section 102.
(3) that staff initiate car pooling at all of the former City Hall locations for Summer 1999, in
consultation with the Toronto Environmental Alliance which has experience in helping many
large institutions develop and instigate car pooling plans.
(4) that staff be directed to immediately implement an employee parking policy for City Hall and
all other work locations so that free commuting spaces become pay for parking, unless free
parking is required because of a disability, contractual obligations, or an occupational
health and safety concerns; and that the Parking Authority of Toronto be responsible for the
administration of the City Hall commuter spaces and a system be developed for other sites.
(5) that existing City of Toronto materials that have been developed by Toronto Public Health
on how children, the elderly and people with lung and health conditions can deal with smog
days be distributed to the public, possibly via doctors offices in conjunction with the Ontario
Medical Association; and that the CAO and Budget Committee report directly to Council on
the funds required to and the source of the funds.
The SPPC referred recommendations Nos. (1), (3), (4) and (5) to the Chief Administrative Officer
to report thereon to City Council at its June 9, 1999 meeting. Recommendations Nos. (1) and (2)
will be reported on by the City Solicitor. This reports report responds to recommendations (3), (4)
and (5) which pertain to car pooling at the City, employee parking policy for City Hall and other
work locations, and distribution of smog material to the public, respectively.
Discussion:
Recommendation (3): Carpooling at the former City Hall locations
At this time it is feasible to initiate car pooling at the former City Hall locations for the Summer of
1999. Carpooling is an effective and inexpensive alternative to a number of transportation
problems. According to the Toronto Environmental Alliance (TEA) there are many reasons why
it makes sense to set up a carpool program within workplaces. The list below identifies some of the
many benefits for the City and its employees.
Benefits for the City
- good corporate citizenship
- cleaner air, less smog, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions
- improved employee relations and better work morale
- reduced tardiness and absenteeism
- reduce employee tension/stress levels
- solution to parking issues and reduced cost associated with parking facilities
Benefits for Employees
- save money on gas, parking, repairs and other car related costs
- cleaner air, less smog, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions
- carpooling provides driving choices; those who prefer to drive may drive, and those who
wish to avoid driving can choose to be passengers
- opportunities to socialize with co-workers, share ideas, or read
- if an individual has car trouble, they are not stranded or seeking help alone.
During the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) strike earlier this year, carpooling was promoted
and coordinated for employees through the City of Toronto's intranet site. Through this network,
City employees are able offer or request a ride aided by an on-line ride-board map of the City. This
intranet could be used on an on-going basis to co-ordinate carpooling for employees. This
carpooling matching system can form the basis of the car pooling program for former City Hall
locations and other work locations.
Based on the experience of the Toronto Environmental Alliance (TEA) with their corporate
carpooling program 'Ride Together', for an employee carpooling program to be effective, the City
must actively communicate and promote carpooling to employees and publicize its exiting
carpooling intranet network. For the summer of 1999, it is recommended that the following
activities be undertaken and supported by the City:
- That the Commissioner of Corporate Services ensure that carpooling is coordinated through
the City's existing intranet site on an on-going basis; and
- That the Chief Administrative Officer and the Commissioner of Corporate Services:
(a) develop a promotional brochure for City employees on carpooling. That this
brochure be adapted from an existing Toronto Environmental Alliance carpooling
information brochure;
(b) ensure that the brochure is circulated to City employees; and
(c) ensure that an article on benefits of carpooling be written and submitted to the City
employee newsletter.
Recommendation (4): Employee Parking Policy
An overall parking policy report is currently being circulated for consultation by the Departments
of the City (including a review by the Legal and Human Resources Divisions). The timeframe for
review of this policy is June and July with a recommended policy option reaching Council in
September 1999 after proceeding through the Office Consolidation Committee and Administration
Committee.
City staff recommend that the current policy options paper receive staff review according to it's
current schedule to ensure full understanding of the potential Human Resources and Legal issues
to be resolved.
Recommendation (5): Public education on smog
The 'Smog Prevention and Reduction: Status Report and Work Plan' identified the need to
disseminate existing public education materials on smog to City of Toronto residents, as well as
information on the steps that can be taken to reduce smog. The need for a short-term and a
long-term public education strategy has been identified. In the short term, during the
Spring/Summer of 1999, there are a number of avenues through which smog related information to
the public will be distributed including:
- The Healthy City Office and Toronto Public Health are distributing existing brochures and
fact sheets through local environmental and community events. To date, smog information
has been distributed through Bike Week events and City sponsored Councillor Environment
Days. Throughout the rest of the spring/summer it is planned that information will be
distributed through Pollution's Probe Clean Air Commute, and other community events.
- A smog display, based on the information in Public Health's smog brochure, has been
developed by the Healthy City Office and Toronto Public Health. The display is a useful
public education tool that will be circulated to public events and other forums by staff and
volunteers.
- Toronto Public Health has provided smog brochures to a number of walk-in clinics in the
Greater Toronto Areas. Broader distribution through walk-in clinics is currently being
explored.
- Smog information will be outlined in article for community newspapers and has been
included in the Environmental Handbook Air Quality section which was distributed through
Toronto Life magazine. Both items are being drafted by Toronto Public Health.
- Idling blitzes to be implemented throughout the summer to crack down on motorist and
tourist buses. Smog Alert brochures to be distributed along with idling information.
Avenues of distribution that are currently being explored include:
- Toronto Public Health has approached the Ontario Medical Association regarding the
possibility of using exiting system(s) to distribute information to doctor's offices. In
addition, it is exploring brochure distribution through drug stores throughout the City.
- Toronto Public Health is exploring the possibility of involving the Toronto Region
Conservation Authority (TRCA), Toronto Parks and Recreation, and Toronto Public
Libraries in a broader awareness strategy, for example, doing joint events.
In the long term, recognizing the need for a comprehensive public education campaign on smog the
Smog Reduction Work Group, a sub-committee of the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment
(TIE) Team, is beginning work on developing an appropriate public education campaign on smog.
The Work Group will report to TIE and City Council in early 2000.
Conclusion:
Most of the recommendations that the CAO was asked to report thereon to City Council are feasible,
however, the feasibility of an employee parking policy will be considered within an appropriate time
frame following due consultation with the Legal and Human Resources Divisions.
Contact:
Lisa Salsberg, Healthy City Office
Tel.: 392-1086
Fax: 392-0089
email: lsalsber@toronto.ca)
(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following report
(June 7, 1999) from the City Solicitor:
Purpose:
This report responds to the request of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee for
information on:
(a) the City immediately instituting enforcement of the Anti-idling By-law (or more accurately
and hereafter referred to as the "Idling Control By-law") using a Part III Summons
technique and the intensification of enforcement during Smog Days;
(b) the status of the application for the "set fine" for the Idling Control By-law; and
(c) the applicability of the provisions of Section 102 of the Municipal Act to passing the by-law.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
The method and extent of enforcement of the Idling Control By-law will impact on the budget of the
enforcing division and department.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that this report be received for information.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee meeting on Tuesday, June 1, 1999, the Committee
referred the following recommendation to the City Solicitor for report thereon to the meeting of City
Council scheduled to be held on June 9, 1999:
"(1) that the City immediately institute enforcement of the Anti-Idling
Bylaw using a Part 3 Summons technique and that this enforcement
be intensified during Smog Days."
Further, the Committee directed the City Solicitor to report directly to Council on (i) the status of
the application for the "set fine" for the Idling Control By-law, and (ii) the applicability of the
provisions of Section 102 of the Municipal Act.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
A. Idling Control By-law
By-law 673-1998, being a By-law "To Prohibit Excessive Idling of Vehicles and Boats", was
enacted by Council at its meeting on October 2, 1998. By-law 673-1998 was enacted further to the
recommendation of the Urban Environment and Development Committee (Clause No. 2 of Report
No. 11). That recommendation was in turn based on the recommendation of The Toronto Pedestrian
Committee that the Idling Control By-law of the former City of Toronto (Municipal Code
Chapter 212) be extended to the entire new City of Toronto.
By-law 673-1998 is essentially identical in its provisions to Chapter 212, Idling of Vehicles and
Boats, of the Municipal Code of the former City of Toronto ("Chapter 212").
Chapter 212 has not been repealed. This is common in situations where a new by-law is coming into
force for which an application for set fines must be made. Given the common delay in obtaining the
required set fine order, the old by-law is not commonly repealed until the order is obtained.
Pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, 1997, every by-law of an old council that is in force immediately
before January 1, 1998 shall be deemed to be a by-law of the council of the new City and remains
in force in respect of the part of the urban area to which it applied immediately before January 1,
1998, until the council repeals it or amends it to provide otherwise.
Given that Chapter 212 was not repealed, Chapter 212 and the set fines applicable to that Chapter
are currently in force and thus may be enforced in the geographical region of the former City of
Toronto.
B. Status of the Set Fine Application
The Application for Set Fines for City of Toronto By-Law No. 673-1998, as amended, was submitted
to the Ministry of the Attorney General for processing on June 3, 1999. The Legal Department has
requested that the application be processed as soon as possible on an expedited basis.
The solicitor responsible for processing of set fine applications with the Ministry of Attorney
General, Crown Law Office (Criminal), has advised that set fine applications are generally
processed according to the date of receipt and that they require approximately six (6) months to
process through their office. However, this solicitor has advised that, if the application is processed
on an expedited basis, it may be processed in their office in approximately one month's time.
Subsequent to the Ministry of the Attorney General's Office processing the application, the matter
must then be processed by the Regional Senior Provincial Court Judge for the set fine order to be
issued.
C. Enforcement of the Anti-Idling By-law using a Part III Summons technique and
intensification of enforcement during Smog Days
Options
There are a number of options available to the City for enforcement of the Idling Control By-law,
including the enforcement of the Municipal Code, Chapter 212, the provisions of which were in
effect extended by the new by-law to the limits of the new City. The options available include:
(i) enforcing only Chapter 212 within the limits of the former City of Toronto, thereby utilizing
the set fines under the by-law;
(ii) enforcing Chapter 212 within the limits of the former City of Toronto in combination with
the enforcement methods referred to in (iii) or (iv) below for the rest of the City;
(iii) enforcing the Idling Control by-law (By-Law 673-1998) using a certificate of offence and
summons under Part I of the Provincial Offences Act; and
(iv) enforcing the Idling Control by-law using Part III of the Provincial Offences Act
commenced by laying an information.
A description of the procedures for enforcement of set fine by-laws and those utilizing the methods
set out in (iii) or (iv) under the Provincial Offences Act is set out in Appendix A to this report. All
of the various methods of enforcement may be utilized. In summary, however, the option of
enforcing only Chapter 212 (with its set fines) within the limits of the former City of Toronto is the
most effective option of enforcement. If Council wishes that the Idling By-law be enforced in the
entire area of the new City, the most effective option of enforcement would be to enforce
Chapter 212 (with its set fines) in the former Toronto limits in combination with enforcement of
By-Law No. 673-1998 by way of certificate of offence and summons under Part I of the Provincial
Offences Act in the areas of the new City other than in the geographical region of the former City
of Toronto.
D. Impact on Staffing
Staff of the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services have provided the following
comments.
"In considering enforcement of this by law, and since most idling would take place
within the road allowance, the most effective coverage of the city would be provided
through staff who normally patrol road allowances. This would include staff
enforcing vending matters and taxi issues (Municipal Licensing and Standards), road
patrols (Works and Emergency Services), Parking Enforcement Officers (Police
Services), and Police Officers/Cadets.
This enforcement effort would obviously draw time from other functions. There may
be value in an initial intensive programme over a period of one or two years with a
number of contract staff hired to focus on specific areas of concern. For example
there could be downtown foot patrols, as well as staff circulating through the City
to delivery areas of major malls, hotels etc. During smog alert days, all staff involved
in any form of patrol or enforcement within the road allowance would be directed
to attend to idling as a priority issue.
In conjunction with the patrol programme there would be value in a communication
effort to major department stores, moving and delivery companies etc. to advise them
that the City will be actively enforcing the Idling By-law, and requesting their
co-operation.
With attention drawn to the existence of, and penalties associated with, the Idling
By-law by the initial intensive programme, it is probable that existing staffing levels
for all Departments involved could subsequently maintain a reasonable level of
enforcement. However it is likely that further programmes with contract staff may
be periodically required to refocus public attention.
Given that Parking Control Officers are those most directly involved in areas where
there are likely to be idling vehicles, I would respectfully suggest that their agency
be that which should be assigned the primary and continuing responsibility for
enforcement for this By-law.
It should be noted that any challenges to the tickets could result in staff being
required to attend court, and this could have a more significant impact in terms of
a draw on staff time than the activity of actually writing tickets."
A Superintendent with the Toronto Police Service, who is presently Unit Commander with Parking
Enforcement, has advised that parking enforcement officers (previously known as parking control
officers) only enforce by-laws relating to stopping, standing, or parking a vehicle where prohibited.
He has advised that enforcement of the Idling Control By-law is outside the mandate of the Parking
Enforcement Unit.
E. The Applicability of Section 102 of the Municipal Act to passing an Anti-Idling
By-Law
Section 102 of the Municipal Act provides as follows:
"Every council may pass such by-laws and make such regulations for the health,
safety, morality and welfare of the inhabitants of the municipality in matters not
specifically provided for by this Act and for governing the conduct of its members as
may be deemed expedient and are not contrary to law."
Municipal Code, Chapter 212, was passed under the authority of section 102 of the Municipal Act,
as was By-law 673-1998.
Conclusions:
(a) Given that Chapter 212 was not repealed, Chapter 212 and the set fines applicable to that
Chapter are currently in force and thus may be enforced in the geographical region of the
former City of Toronto.
(b) The Application for Set Fines for City of Toronto By-Law No. 673-1998, as amended, was
submitted to the Ministry of the Attorney General for processing on June 3, 1999. The Legal
Department has requested that the application be processed as soon as possible on an
expedited basis. If the application is processed on an expedited basis, we are informed it
may be processed in their office in approximately one month's time.
(c) The option of enforcing only Chapter 212 (with its set fines) within the limits of the former
City of Toronto is the most effective option of enforcement. If Council wishes that the Idling
By-law be enforced in the entire area of the new City, the most effective option of
enforcement would be to enforce Chapter 212 (with its set fines) in the former Toronto limits
in combination with enforcement of By-Law No. 673-1998 by way of certificate of offence
and summons under Part I of the Provincial Offences Act in the areas of the new City other
than in the geographical region of the former City of Toronto.
Contact Name:
Belinda Brenner - 392-8357
James Anderson,Director, Municipal Section - 392-8059
--------
APPENDIX A
(A) Part I of the Provincial Offences Act
Part I of the Provincial Offences Act provides that a proceeding in respect of an offence may be
commenced by filing a certificate of offence alleging the offence in the office of the court. Pursuant
to Part I, a Provincial offences officer who believes that one or more persons have committed an
offence may issue, by completing and signing, a certificate of offence certifying that the offence has
been committed and,
(a) an offence notice indicating the set fine for the offence; or
(b) a summons.
Accordingly, Part I of the Provincial Offences Act provides two alternative ways of proceeding. One
being by way of certificate of offence and offence notice; the other being by way of certificate of
offence and a summons.
The first option is only available where there are set fines for the offence, such as for Chapter 212.
Accordingly, where there are no set fines, as in the case of By-law 673-1998, the only available
method of proceeding under Part I (in addition to the alternative of proceeding under Part III) is
by way of certificate of offence and summons.
Each of the offence notice or the summons must be personally served upon the person charged
within thirty (30) days after the alleged offence occurred. The certificate of offence shall then be
filed in the court office as soon as is practicable after service of the offence notice or summons.
Certificate of Offence and Offence Notice
Pursuant to the Provincial Offences Act, where a defendant is served with an offence notice, the
defendant may give notice of intention to appear in court for the purpose of entering a plea and
having a trial.
Where an offence notice is served on a defendant who does not wish to dispute the charge but wants
to make submissions as to penalty, including the extension of time for payment, the defendant may
appear before a justice at a specified time and place and plead guilty to the offence and make
submissions as to penalty, and the justice may enter a conviction and impose the set fine or such
lesser fine as is permitted by law.
Where an offence notice is served on a defendant who does not wish to dispute the charge, the
defendant may sign the plea of guilty on the offence notice and deliver the offence notice and the
amount of the set fine to the office of the court specified in the notice. Acceptance by the court office
of such a payment constitutes a plea of guilty whether or not the plea is signed and the endorsement
of payment on the certificate of offence constitutes the conviction and imposition of a fine in the
amount of the set fine for the offence.
Where at least 15 days have passed after the defendant was served with the offence notice and the
offence notice has not been delivered back to the court in accordance with the provisions of the
Provincial Offences Act outlining that the defendant does not wish to dispute the charge, or
outlining that the defendant resides outside the county or district in which the office of the court
specified in the notice is situate and that this defendant wishes to dispute the charge but does not
want to attend or be represented at trial, and a plea of guilty with representations has not been
accepted, the defendant will be deemed to not wish to dispute the charge and a justice shall examine
the certificate of offence and,
(a) where the certificate of offence is complete and regular on its face, the justice shall
enter a conviction in the defendant's absence and without a hearing and impose the
set fine for the offence; or
(b) where the certificate of offence is not complete and regular on its face, the justice
shall quash the proceeding.
Certificate of Offence and Summons
Where a certificate of offence and a summons are issued, the matter must proceed to trial.
(B) Part III of the Provincial Offences Act
Pursuant to Part III of the Provincial Offences Act, a proceeding in respect of an offence may be
commenced by laying an information. Where a summons or offence notice has been served under
Part I, however, no proceeding can be commenced by way of laying an information in respect of the
same offence, except with the consent of the Attorney General or his or her agent.
Where a Provincial offences officer believes, on reasonable and probable grounds, that an offence
has been committed by a person whom the officer finds at or near the place where the offence was
committed, he or she may, before an information is laid, serve the person with a summons in the
prescribed form.
Any person who, on reasonable and probable grounds, believes that one or more persons have
committed an offence, may lay an information in the prescribed form and under oath before a justice
alleging the offence and the justice shall receive the information.
The procedure for laying an information is as follows. A justice who receives an information laid
under Part III shall consider the information and, where the justice considers it desirable to do so,
hear and consider in the absence of the defendant the allegations of the informant and the evidence
of witnesses and,
(a) where he or she considers that a case for so doing is made out,
(i) confirm the summons which was served under Part III prior to an
information being laid, if any,
(ii) issue a summons in the prescribed form, or
(iii) where the arrest is authorized by statute and where the allegations of the
informant or the evidence satisfy the justice on reasonable and probable
grounds that it is necessary in the public interest to do so, issue a warrant for
the arrest of the defendant; or
(b) where he or she considers that a case for issuing process is not made out,
(i) so endorse the information, and
(ii) where a summons was served under Part III prior to an information being
laid, cancel it and cause the defendant to be so notified.
A summons issued under Part III shall (a) be directed to the defendant, (b) set out briefly the offence
in respect of which the defendant is charged, and (c) require the defendant to attend court at a time
and place stated therein and to attend thereafter as required by the court in order to be dealt with
according to law.
The summons shall be served by a Provincial offences officer by delivering it personally to the
person to whom it is directed or, if that person cannot conveniently be found, by leaving it for the
person at the person's last known or usual place of abode with an inmate thereof who appears to
be at least 16 years of age. Notwithstanding the above, where the person to whom the summons is
directed does not reside in Ontario, the summons will be deemed to have been served seven (7) days
after it has been sent by registered mail to the person's last known or usual place of abode. Service
of a summons on a corporation may be made personally or by registered mail.
(C) Comparison of Part I Proceeding and Part III Proceeding
In comparing a proceeding commenced under Part I of the Provincial Offences Act by way of
certificate of offence and summons to a proceeding commenced under Part III of the Provincial
Offences Act by way of information, the Part I method is more time effective. Unlike a proceeding
under Part I where a certificate of offence and summons may be served on the spot, a proceeding
under Part III requires that an information be laid before a justice.)
4
Review and Harmonization of Environmentally
Responsible Procurement
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, struck out and referred this Clause to the Administration
Committee for consideration, with a request that all interested parties, including residents,
representatives from labour, business, industry and research science, and those persons who
appeared before the City Services Committee of the former City of Toronto Council in 1995 on the
phasing out of the use of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe, be invited to participate in the deliberations
in this regard by appearing in deputation or submitting a communication to the Committee.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the report
(April 26, 1999) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, subject to adding the
following Clauses to the Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy contained in
Appendix "A":
"(7) given the environmental and economic importance of infrastructure,
environmentally responsible procurement principles should be fully
applied to construction design, processes, tendering and materials; and
(8) given that many environmentally preferred products and services can
produce a variety of tangible benefits, full consideration should be given
to the long term and complete costs and benefits of green procurement."
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following report (April 26, 1999)
from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer:
Purpose:
To respond to the request of the Environmental Task Force regarding the "quick start idea" to review
and harmonize Environmentally Responsible Procurement.
Financial Implications:
There are no financial implications for either the short term or long term.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the City of Toronto adopt the Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy attached as
Appendix A; and
(2) Interim Purchasing By-Law No. 57-1998 be revised to include the new City of Toronto
Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy.
Council Reference/Background History:
In early September 1998, the Environmental Task Force held a series of focussed workshops in the
areas of air, land, water, nature/greenspace, toxics/pollution prevention and sustainable energy
strategies. Participants included Task Force members, city staff, representatives from environmental
groups and agencies, community groups, business, education and labour. The workshops were
chaired by City Councillors who are members of the Task Force. The participants of the workshops
were asked to identify priority issues and actions for their topic areas. In addition, they were asked
to identify quick start ideas that would result in improvements to the environment, achieve cost
savings, create local employment and require limited new resources to implement.
The quick start ideas were prioritized by workshop participants and reviewed by smaller groups of
workshop participants and Environmental Task Force staff to identify actions which the Task Force
could take or recommend. For those priority quick starts which City or Agency staff were being
asked to take action, program staff were consulted to determine feasibility, cost implications, etc.
Environmentally Responsible Procurement was identified as a "quick start" idea at two of the
workshops.
In addition, the Environmental Task Force at its meeting on December 18, 1998 requested in a report
to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee that the Commissioner of Finance submit the
Environmentally Responsible Purchasing Policy that is being prepared for City Council as soon as
possible and submit it to the Environmental Task Force for information en-route to Standing
Committee.
A review of Environmentally Responsible Procurement policies of former municipalities was
conducted by the Finance Department Purchasing and Materials Management Division and the
following are a summary of the findings and recommendations.
Comments:
A review of Environmentally Responsible Procurement activities of the former municipalities has
indicated that the former City of Toronto and Metro Toronto had the following Environmentally
Responsible Procurement policies:
Former Metro Policy:
In order to contribute to waste reduction and to increase the development and awareness of
Environmentally Sound Purchasing, acquisitions of goods and services will ensure that
wherever possible specifications are amended to provide for expanded use of durable
products, reusable products and products (including those used in services) that contain the
maximum level of post-consumer waste and/or recyclable content, without significantly
affecting the intended use of the products or service. It is recognized that cost analysis is
required in order to ensure that the products are made available at competitive prices.
Former City Policy:
That in order to increase the development and awareness of Environmentally Sound Products
all departments, in conjunction with Purchasing and Supply staff review their contracts and
tender specifications for goods and services, to ensure that wherever possible and
economical, specifications are amended to provide for expanded use of products and services
that contain the maximum level of post-consumer recyclable waste and/or recyclable content,
without significantly affecting the intended use of the product or service, and that it is
recognized that cost analysis is required in order to ensure that the products are made
available at competitive prices.
Both policies recognized the need to expand the use of Environmentally Sound Products, that the
products/service must be suitable for the intended use to ensure that operational requirements are met
and that the products/services must be competitive in cost to ensure that the City/Metro would not
pay unnecessary price premiums for these products or restrict competition in its purchasing activities.
The above policies are still being applied to all former City and Metro purchasing activity. The
policies however only mention products/services containing maximum levels of post-consumer
waste and/or recyclable content in order to minimize waste. They do not mention products/services
that result in minimum damage to the environment (i.e. pollutants, non-renewable resources, public
health).
Discussions with representatives of the Federal Government Environmental Choice Program (a
Federal Government program which identifies products and services having an environmental
benefit) has resulted in the Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy attached as
Appendix A. The policy includes the above-mentioned concerns of minimizing damage to the
environment.
The policy would ensure that suppliers are aware that the City is looking to expand its use of
environmentally preferred products/services, that these products/services are obtained in a
competitive manner to ensure best prices possible for the City, that specifications for acquisitions
of goods and services are expanded to include such products/services, that the products/services
provide the performance required by the City, and would harmonize Environmentally Responsible
Procurement practices within the City of Toronto.
Although the new Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy can be applied to all City
Purchasing activity, Guidelines for Environmentally Preferred Products and Services are developed
by the Federal Government Environmental Choice Program (ECP). The Purchasing and Materials
Management Division will continue to liaise with the ECP to encourage the development of
guidelines for all products/services purchased by the City. The guidelines are referenced in
specifications for acquisition of goods and services to ensure that those offering environmentally
preferred products/services meet the requirements of the guidelines so that the products/services
offered are in fact environmentally responsible products.
To ensure that procurement specifications allow for the purchase of environmentally preferred
products/services, the Purchasing and Materials Division will continue to work corporately with
departments to ensure that specifications for acquisitions of goods and services are expanded to
include those products/services.
Conclusions:
In order to ensure that suppliers are made aware of the City's intentions to expand its use of
environmentally preferred products/services and to ensure that specifications for acquisitions are
expanded to include such products/services, an Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy
has been developed, and included as Appendix A in this report.
The adoption of this policy and its inclusion in Interim Purchasing By-Law No. 57-1998 would not
only ensure a harmonization of Environmentally Responsible Procurement activities within the City
of Toronto, but would also ensure that the City adopts environmentally responsible procurement
practices.
Contact Name and Telephone Number:
Lou Pagano, Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division
Finance Department
Telephone: 392-7312
Appendix A
City of Toronto
Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy
"That in order to increase the development and awareness of environmentally preferred
products, acquisitions of goods and services will ensure that wherever possible specifications
are amended to provide for expanded use of durable products, reusable products, energy
efficient products, low pollution products, products (including those used in services) that
contain the maximum level of post-consumer waste and/or recyclable content and provide
minimal impact to the environment.
An Environmentally Preferred Product (EPP) is one that is less harmful to the environment
than the next best alternative. Characteristics of an EPP are as follows:
(1) Reduce waste and make efficient use of resources:
An EPP would be a product that is more energy, fuel, or water efficient, or that uses
less paper, ink, or other resources. For example, energy-efficient lighting, and
photocopiers capable of double-sided photocopying.
(2) Are reusable or contain reusable parts:
These are products such as rechargeable batteries, reusable building partitions, and
laser printers with refillable toner cartridges.
(3) Are recyclable:
A product will be considered to be an EPP if local facilities exist capable of recycling
the product at the end of its useful life.
(4) Contain recycled materials:
An EPP contains post-consumer recycled content. An example is paper products
made from recycled post-consumer fibre.
(5) Produce fewer polluting by-products and/or safety hazards during manufacture, use
or disposal:
An EPP product would be a non-hazardous product that replaces a hazardous
product.
(6) Have a long service-life and/or can be economically and effectively repaired or
upgraded.
It is recognized that cost analysis is required in order to ensure that the products are made
available at competitive prices, and that the environmental benefits provided by a product
or service does not undermine its overall performance."
The following persons appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee in connection
with the foregoing matter:
- Mr. Steven Peck, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities Coalition;
- Ms. Monica E. Kuhn, Architect, Architecture Rooftop Gardens Permaculture Designs; and
- Mr. Rich Whate, Toronto Environmental Alliance, and filed a submission in regard thereto.
(Councillor Augimeri, at the meeting of City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, declared her
interest in the foregoing Clause, in that her husband is a shareholder in a company that deals with
environmentally responsible goods.)
5
Summary of the City of Toronto's Response to the
Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force
and Implementation Plan
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the following
joint report (May 18, 1999) from Mayor Mel Lastman and the Chief Administrative Officer:
Purpose:
To summarize City Council's response to the recommendations of the Mayor's Homelessness Action
Task Force report, "Taking Responsibility for Homelessness: An Action Plan for the City of
Toronto" and to discuss how to implement the City's action plan.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no unbudgeted financial implications for the City arising from this report.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) Council thank the chair and members of the Council Strategy Committee for People Without
Homes for their work over the past year in fulfilling the mandate of the committee, and
further, that future decision making on implementation of the City's homeless action plan
occur through the standing committees of Council;
(2) the Chief Administrative Officer and the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services convene a meeting of the chairs of the Capital Revolving Fund Reference Group,
the Property Management Committee, the Advisory Committee for Homeless and Socially
Isolated Persons and the Alternative Housing and Services Committee to ensure coordination
of the implementation activities outlined in this report; and
(3) appropriate City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Council Reference/Background/History:
On January 14, 1999, Dr. Anne Golden presented the Mayor with the final report of the Mayor's
Homelessness Action Task Force. Since that time, the City has placed a high priority on developing
its response to the report. In a few short months Council has dealt with the major policy and
financial issues directed at the City by the Task Force. Most importantly, City Council has answered
the call for strong leadership in addressing Toronto's homeless crisis.
In March, the Mayor brought the Provincial and Federal governments to the table to discuss the role
of each level of government in resolving this national crisis. The City also partnered with the
Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) to convene the first national conference on
homelessness and housing. This event helped to spark a national momentum on these issues and
contributed to the design of the FCM National Housing Options paper aimed at generating renewed
Federal involvement through a national housing program.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
The City has taken action on a number of fronts that respond to the recommendations of the Task
Force. The following is a list of the key initiatives (see Appendix D for a more detailed summary).
To date the City of Toronto has:
(1) created a $10.9 million Capital Revolving Fund to lever affordable housing development;
(2) developed terms of reference for the Capital Revolving Fund and set up a reference group
to advise Council on use of the fund;
(3) agreed to pursue contributions toward affordable housing under Section 37 of the Planning
Act for increases in permitted height and/or density as potential source for replenishing the
Capital Revolving Fund;
(4) approved second-suites as-of-right in all single- and semi-detached houses across the city
with implementing by-laws to come forward in 60 days;
(5) adopted policies to control condominium conversion/demolition of rental housing;
(6) established a new multi-residential property tax class to encourage the development of new
rental housing;
(7) created a $9 million Shelter Fund for families on social assistance;
(8) created a $50,000.00 rent bank for women with children (provision to increase fund to
$200,000.00 is in 1999 budget), and $55,000.00 for additional eviction prevention programs;
(9) dedicated between $5 to 7 million of social housing savings to the Mayor's Homeless
Initiatives Fund;
(10) decided on a policy of moving away from emergency responses and into prevention
strategies;
(11) endorsed, in principle, the draft of the FCM National Housing Policy Options paper; and
(12) contributed $60,000.00 to the Big City Mayor's Homelessness and Housing Initiative to
campaign for a national housing program.
The City has also approved implementation of the following initiatives:
(1) developing a semi-annual municipal report card on homelessness;
(2) taking a broad service planning approach that breaks down service silos;
(3) began process to create a development charges by-law that will explore the option of a rebate
program for affordable rental housing;
(4) a hostel follow up program to help people find and keep their housing;
(5) bringing together municipal, Provincial, institutional and community partners to determine
how to implement the Task Force homeless health strategy that addresses health, mental
health and addictions issues; and
(6) bringing together government and community partners to set up more harm reduction
programs.
In addition, City Council will be voting on the details of a housing first policy recommending use
of municipal lands for affordable housing at its June meeting.
A Role for the Province and the Federal Governments:
The City cannot solve the homeless crisis alone, the Provincial and Federal governments must be
part of the solution. The City continues to work with the Province which recently announced a
number of homeless initiatives. The Federal government has appointed a minister responsible for
homelessness who has agreed to meet with the City to discuss Toronto's homeless crisis. While
these first steps are encouraging, we need a stronger commitment by both levels of government.
To date the Province has announced plans to:
(1) dedicate $45 million for new supportive housing units for people with mental illness;
(2) provide grants of up to $2,000.00 for PST paid on new affordable housing development;
(3) spend the $50 million on rent supplements that will come from signing the Social Housing
Agreement with the Federal government;
(4) reallocate $2.5 million over next three years from expiring rent supplement contracts to help
house 300 to 400 people with special needs;
(5) made public lands available to create up to 500 affordable rental units;
(6) transfer the Community Partners Program and the Supports to Daily Living Program to
municipalities; and
(7) commission an affordable housing design competition.
The Province has taken action in the following areas:
(1) increased the Provincial Homeless Initiatives Fund to $10 million province-wide (Toronto
receives $4.724 million annually);
(2) increased Community Start Up Benefits for families leaving hostels;
(3) dedicated $1 million to help divert ex-offenders from the hostel system; and
(4) allowed municipalities to redirect some hostel funding to prevention programs.
Further, we need the Province to:
(1) restore demolition control powers for municipalities previously allowed under the Rental
Housing Protection Act;
(2) increase the shelter component of social assistance and create a new shelter allowance
program for the working poor to ensure people have enough income to afford the housing
that is available;
(3) build more supportive housing units in Toronto and across the Province;
(4) provide a housing "tool box" for municipalities with resources such as capital grants/equity
or a role in lending;
(5) ensure the creation of second suites does not increase the CVA of residential properties;
(6) come to the table with the City, institutions and community-based services to resolve issues
related to people being discharged from institution, hospitals and prisons to no fixed address.
To date the Federal government has:
(1) appointed a minister responsible for homelessness who is conducting a cross-Canada tour
to discuss homelessness issues and solutions;
(2) provided additional funding through the Residential Rehabilitation and Prevention Program
for rental apartments and rooming houses($6.5 million for Toronto in 1999); and
(3) provided funding support through Human Resources Development Canada to a number of
community-based homeless initiatives including Community Information Toronto to create
a central bed registry.
Further, we need the Federal government to:
(1) establish a $300 million annual capital program for low-income housing;
(2) make CMHC mortgage insurance conditions easier for low-cost housing;
(3) provide direct lending by CMHC to get the lowest possible mortgage interest rates;
(4) provide GST rebates for affordable housing development;
(5) provide capital funding for the creation of second suites;
(6) consider income tax relief for income from second suites;
(7) contribute $7 million (annually) in RRAP funding to Toronto for rental apartments, rooming
houses and second suites;
(8) make government-owned land available for affordable housing; and
(9) come to the table with the City of Toronto and its community partners to develop strategies
to address the needs of Aboriginal people and immigrants and refugees who are homeless.
Implementing the City's Action Plan on Homelessness:
The Council Strategy Committee for People Without Homes was established last year through a
recommendation by the Transition Team with a mandate to analyze the Mayor's Homelessness
Action Task Force report. The City has developed its response to the Task Force report and has
moved on to implementation. In that regard, there are a number of committees in place to help
inform implementation of the City's action plan on homelessness. These groups, listed below, have
a mix of politicians, City staff, community and private sector representatives and Federal and
Provincial officials:
(a) the Capital Revolving Fund Reference Group is comprised of a municipal councillor, City
staff, community-based and private-sector housing representatives, Provincial and Federal
officials. This group assesses proposals for housing demonstration projects;
(b) the Property Management Committee includes City staff from relevant departments that will
serve as one forum for reviewing options to use City-owned land for affordable housing;
(c) the Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons includes representatives
from a range of community agencies, homeless people, hostels, drop-ins, outreach services,
police, mental health and addictions agencies, faith communities, Provincial and municipal
staff and city councillors. The committee advises the City on service priorities and emerging
issues in the sector; and
(d) the Alternative Housing and Services Committee is also a community based group that
functions primarily as a staff reference group to the Shelter, Housing and Support Division
of Community and Neighbourhood Services on the development of innovative homeless and
housing initiatives.
As these committees are already in place and the Council Strategy Committee for People Without
Homes has fulfilled its mandate, it is recommended that Council thank the chair and members of the
Council Strategy Committee for their contribution to the City's response to the homeless crisis.
Future decision making as the City's homeless action plan continues to roll out should occur through
the standing committees. Funds made available to the Council Strategy Committee should be
redirected to support the work of the above four committees. A report will be forthcoming on the
recommended use of the funds.
In addition, it is recommended that the Chief Administrative Officer and the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services convene a meeting of the chairs of the Capital Revolving
Fund Reference Group, the Property Management Committee, the Advisory Committee for
Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons and the Alternative Housing and Services Committee to
ensure coordination of the implementation activities outlined in this report.
An Interdepartmental Staff Group:
Homelessness is an issue that cuts across many of the City's departments including Community and
Neighbourhood Services incorporating Public Health and the Toronto Housing Company, as well
as Urban Planning and Development Services, Finance and Corporate Services. These departments
have worked closely together over the last few months assisting Council with its analysis of the Task
Force report. In order to guide implementation of the City's homelessness initiatives, an ongoing
interdepartmental staff group should be established with the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services as the designated executive lead on homeless issues.
The staff group will provide direction and guidance as implementation of the City's homeless action
plan unfolds. As issues arise, Council will provide direction and decision making through
appropriate standing committees. The staff group will need to develop a work plan to identify both
short and long term initiatives with clear time lines. This work plan should be flexible enough to
accommodate emerging issues and to encourage proactive responses.
A Municipal Report Card on Homelessness:
The City will develop a semi-annual report card on homelessness that will document the state of
homelessness in Toronto and act as a monitoring tool and an accountability mechanism to assess
progress in addressing homelessness. As a monitoring tool it will document initiatives that support
or contravene the City's action plan. It will also hold the City accountable for implementing the
homeless action plan approved by City Council.
Conclusions:
The City of Toronto has taken and must continue to take a strong leadership role to address
homelessness. Council has taken action on the key recommendations of the Task Force directed at
the City and must continue to call on the Provincial and Federal government's to do their part.
However, the homeless crisis is still growing in Toronto and more work needs to be done.
The City is committed to implementing all of the initiatives approved by Council. This will require
partnerships with other levels of government, institutions and the community-based sector. An
interdepartmental group will be set up to guide the roll out of these initiatives. The City will be
accountable to the public for implementing its homeless action plan through the new report card on
homelessness.
Contact Name:
Shirley Hoy, Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services
Phone: 392-8302, Fax: 392-8492.
--------
Appendix A
Summary of Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force
Directions adopted by City Council.
A Municipal Report Card on Homelessness:
The City will develop a municipal report card on homelessness, as recommended by the Task Force,
to function as a monitoring tool and accountability mechanism to ensure implementation of the
City's action plan on homelessness. A proposed format for the report card will be submitted to
Council by the Fall. The report card itself will be presented to the Policy and Finance Committee
twice a year.
A set of key indicators will need to be developed that reflect the pressure points in the system such
as the number of evictions, the number of people using emergency shelter, the use of health and
mental health facilities, estimates of gaps in service, social housing waiting lists and progress
towards a more sufficient and equitable distribution of affordable and supportive housing and
services across the city, region and province.
Co-ordinating and Simplifying the Service System:
In recognition of the need for a comprehensive database of social, health, and housing services and
central bed registry, the City supports the efforts of Community Information Toronto (CIT) to
establish a bed registry with funding from Human Resources and Development Canada.
Capital funding to upgrade drop-in centres and hostels is essential. Significant funds are required
to maintain and upgrade these buildings and the City does not have a capital fund for this purpose.
The City has approached the Province to provide a $1.5 million capital fund for hostels and to
expand support currently available under the Health and Safety grant program for capital upgrades
and food equipment for drop-in centres.
The City agrees with the Task Force that a comprehensive, integrated service planning approach is
needed to help break down existing service silos and to ensure effective service delivery for people
who are homeless. Service planning will be done according to three sub-groups: families, youth and
singles. In addition, the City will continue to channel resources into prevention programs to help
people from losing their housing.
The Province recently announced plans to increase the Provincial Homelessness Initiatives Fund by
an additional $6 million. The City of Toronto's share is $3.704 bringing the annual amount to
$4.724 million. The City must report to the Province by June 1999 on how these new dollars will
be allocated. Funding priorities for the City include prevention and diversion programs consistent
with the Task Force emphasis on this service focus.
Specific Strategies for High Risk Groups:
Families:
The growing number of homeless families is of critical concern for the City. Families are staying
for longer periods of time in hostels because of the lack of affordable housing. Extended stays
present numerous issues, especially for the children. The City has approved a number of short-term
strategies such as how to address the education issues for children of homeless families and the need
for a long-term strategy to distribute family hostels more equitably across the city to reduce the
current concentration in Scarborough.
Youth:
The City funds youth shelters and community-based youth services, however, the rise in youth
homelessness indicates more needs to be done. The City will urge the Province to support the
Breaking the Cycle funding proposal to develop a substance abuse treatment program for young
parents. The City, in partnership with Eva's Place youth shelter, is developing a transitional housing
support program. An area in which the City will become more proactive is establishing partnerships
between youth shelters and local landlords to create more housing units for youth.
Abused Women:
At least as many abused women stay in emergency shelters as stay in abused women's shelters. As
of 1998, the Province is responsible for funding abused women's shelters. As a long-term goal, the
City is encouraging the Province to expand the abused women's shelter system by 380 beds to
ensure women have appropriate support in this regard. In the short-term, the Province is urged to
fund community agencies to provide support to abused women forced to stay in emergency hostels
due to lack of space in the abused women's shelter system.
Aboriginal People:
Aboriginal people are disproportionately represented among the homeless and require a range of
supports and services with are culturally appropriate. As a first step in developing a strategy for this
group, the City will approach the Federal government to designate a senior representative to work
with the City and representatives of Aboriginal organizations.
Immigrants and Refugees:
The City of Toronto will seek the appointment of a Federal representative to work with the
municipality and representatives of the immigrant and refugee service sector to discuss a broad range
of immigration and refugee policy and program issues including those related to homelessness.
Refugee claimants are most at risk of becoming homeless, in large part due to the limited supports
and opportunities available to them upon arrival in Canada. Basic settlement and health services for
refugee claimants as well as another shelter in Toronto, specifically for refugees, are key areas in
which the City will seek Federal funding.
A Shift to Prevention Strategies:
The City will continue to shift away from emergency responses to prevention strategies by directing
resources into prevention and diversion strategies while at the same time trying to address the
growing demands on the emergency shelter system.
Addressing Affordability Issues for People in receipt of Social Assistance:
The City supports the Task Force recommendations to address the critical affordability issues of
people in receipt of social assistance. These include asking the Province to increase the shelter
component of social assistance to better reflect local market conditions and creating a new shelter
allowance program for the working poor. The Province has not implemented either
recommendation.
First and Last Month's Rent for Ontario Works Recipients:
Under the Ontario Works legislation, last month's rent can be accessed once a year through
Community Start Up Benefits (CSUB). These benefits are available for people leaving hostels or
institutions or who are fleeing an abusive situation. The Province recently announced plans to
increase CSUB from the current maximum of $799.00 to $1,500.00 for families leaving hostels
which more accurately reflects these costs.
The City has created a new shelter fund (approximately $9 million for 1999) using the municipal
savings from the National Child Tax Benefit. This will be used to help families in receipt of social
assistance with first and last month's rent, rental arrears, to secure, maintain or move to more
appropriate/suitable housing to help prevent homelessness among families.
Hostel Follow Up:
The City supports the Task Force direction to target resources to strategies that help people move
out of hostels and into housing and for follow up support to help people keep their housing. This
shift has already begun but the City has been limited due to budget constraints.
Hostel operators agree that follow up would make a tremendous difference in helping people to
maintain their housing. This kind of support would likely reduce recidivism and make a significant
difference to the City's hostel costs as it is estimated that while only 17 percent of people staying in
hostels are classified as "chronic" users, they use 46 percent of the hostel system resources. Funding
for this type of program (estimated at $2.2 million annually) will be considered under the allocation
priorities of the recently increased Provincial Homeless Initiatives Fund.
Housing Help:
The Task Force recommends that housing help services be provided at welfare offices by
purchase-of-service contracts between Social Services and community-based agencies which provide
housing help support. This direction is consistent with existing Social Services policy initiatives to
use all available means to assist clients to find and maintain affordable and adequate housing.
However, there is no mechanism to fund housing help services under the current Ontario Works
legislation.
In 1999, the City has allocated almost $350,000.00 in 1999 for community-based housing help
services through the Provincial Homeless Initiatives Fund. While these programs are not located in
welfare offices they are targeted to people with low-incomes, many of whom are in receipt of social
assistance. City staff will collaborate with agencies which provide housing-help support to
determine the most appropriate mechanism for providing this support for the year 2000 and beyond.
The Province plans to download administration of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
Community Partners Program, to municipalities. Toronto's share of this program is $900,000.00.
Funding will continue to flow from the Province. This initiative is appropriate for the City which
funds many of the same housing help and support services. It will enable a more integrated and
systematic approach to funding and service delivery.
Eviction Prevention:
Consistent with directions proposed by the Task Force the City will continue to fund a rent bank for
women and children. The final evaluation of this pilot project in the Fall will inform the decision
to increase this fund to $200,000.00, an amount already approved by Council.
A report reviewing the City's current $55,000.00 eviction prevention program and making
recommendations for future directions of this program will be before Community and
Neighbourhood Services in May. The report will also document significant impacts of the new
Tenant Protection Act on tenancy stability and the need for ongoing monitoring. As part of the
City's effort to shift away from emergency responses to preventative approaches, eviction prevention
is emerging as a key area for funding and program support.
The eviction prevention report will also support the Task Force call to urge the Province to increase
funding to community legal clinics. The report does not support the Task Force recommendation
for "fast track" evictions in suites in owner-occupied properties as the Tenant Protection Act has
already significantly reduced the length of time needed to process an eviction application. A report
on a review of funding for the FMTA hotline will go to Community and Neighbourhood Services
Committee in early summer.
Community Economic Development (CED):
The City currently allocates about $150,000.00 for CED initiatives through its municipal grants
programs. The City is reviewing its role with respect to CED initiatives and will be reporting out to
Council. Consideration of the Task Force recommendation regarding the Productive Enterprises
Fund will be done within the context of this review.
Discharge Planning:
The Province has announced $1 million in funding for the Ontario Multi-Faith Council for discharge
planning, including follow up, for people leaving correctional facilities. The Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services will convene a meeting with this group, the John Howard
Society and the Elizabeth Fry Society, on the development of these policies. The City will also urge
the Province to develop appropriate discharge policies for health and mental health institutions.
A Homeless Health Strategy
The Task Force outlines a comprehensive health strategy to address the health and mental health
needs of the homeless population. This includes ways to remove barriers to accessing comprehensive
health care. The City is in the process of bringing together municipal, Provincial and community
partners to develop a strategy to implement the health recommendations contained in the Task Force
report. The City will also urge the Province to earmark funds from the transfer of Federal monies
for health and social services to a dedicated Homeless Health Fund.
The City has approved a homelessness action strategy for Public Health Services building on the
existing range of preventative, support and treatment services for homeless persons. This includes
five additional full-time positions to support underserviced areas.
The City has committed to taking the lead in bringing together key government and community
partners to establish additional harm reduction programs to address the needs of the "hardest to
serve", people with a drug and/or alcohol addiction or both a mental illness and an addiction.
Supportive Housing:
The Task Force emphasized supportive housing as key to solving the homeless crisis. Council has
called on the Province to build 5,000 new supportive housing units in Toronto over the next five
years while at the same time adding 8,500 new units across the Province. The Province has
committed to $45 million to develop new supportive housing with $20 million allocated in the first
year to provide 1,000 new units. This is a smaller scale than is recommended or needed but is a
positive first step.
The City will urge the Province to ensure that the definition of special need and eligibility for
supportive housing is broad enough to include "hard to house" homeless people whether they have
a diagnosis of mental illness or not. The Province is also to expand the Habitat Services program
by 200 beds in the year 2000.
The Province plans to download the Support to Daily Living Program to municipalities. This
program is currently administered by the Ministry of Community and Social Services and funds
supports for housing for "hard-to-house" and homeless people. The total cost of this program for
agencies in Toronto is approximately $3 million. The City will ask the Province to maintain
administration of this program in recognition of its responsibility for supportive housing.
Affordable Rental Housing:
The City has a key role through its land use process to enable the creation of affordable housing. It
has significant resources at its disposal to help lever the development of affordable housing such as
land, a capital fund and the capacity to set development charges and rental property taxes. It also has
planning tools such as restricting condominium conversions and demolitions, liberalizing policies
related to the legalization of second suites and rooming houses under certain land use criteria, and
utilizing the provisions of the Planning Act (section 37) addressing density incentives. A viable
housing strategy must include the preservation of existing rental stock, the stimulation of new rental
supply and solutions to affordability issues.
(1) Preserving the Existing Housing Stock:
The existing rental housing provides the largest number of affordable units for low-income
people. Therefore, efforts to preserve the housing we do have available is a critical
component of the City's homelessness action plan. Council has adopted new Official Plan
policies and related by-laws regarding condominium conversion and demotion of affordable
rental housing. The City is seeking additional authority from the Province in the area of
demolition control.
Rehabilitation of private apartments for non-profit use can make cost-effective use of public
dollars, and is a way of targeting existing stock to those with affordability problems while
also upgrading it. Rehabilitation is seen as a necessary part of a municipal housing mandate.
As a delivery agent for the Federal Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program, the City
is currently in the process of allocating more than $6.5 million in one-time, additional
Federal assistance to rooming houses and rental properties in Toronto. This assistance will
help repair and preserve about 500 units and will help to bring over 150 units on-stream, at
affordable rent levels.
(2) Stimulating New Rental Supply:
All levels of government have a significant role to play in helping to "level the playing field"
between new rental production and other housing production. Two important steps have
already been taken in this regard. First, the City has established a special property tax class
for new multi-residential rental housing set at the same rate as residential. The current
Provincial legislation limits this new tax class to eight years therefore the City will seek an
extension beyond this time period. Secondly, the Province has announced a PST rebate on
building materials for new multi-residential rental construction of up to $2,000.00 over the
next three years. The City is urging an extension beyond this time period.
Equitable GST treatment is also needed to stimulate supply. At 7 percent, GST adds
approximately $8,500.00 to private rental unit production costs. Setting it a the freehold rate
of 4.5 percent would create a more equitable playing field. The City of Toronto has urged
the Federal government to implement this important recommendation.
The City is exploring options for streamlining approvals that build on current efforts and take
into account best practices as amalgamation provides an opportunity to establish a
corporate-wide, fast-track process.
Second suites already provide a significant number of affordable apartments (the Task Force
estimates that one out of every five rental units in Toronto is a second suite). City Council
has approved second suites as-of-right in all single- and semi-detached houses, subject to
building, fire and planning standards. Council will call on the Federal government to provide
capital funding for the creation of second suites and seek income tax relief for income from
second suites. And further, to ask the Province to ensure the creation of second suites does
not increase the CVA of residential properties;
The City is in the process of creating a development charges by-law. The by-law will
establish a set of charges against new residential and non-residential development. The
charges are intended to fund improvements in the City's infrastructure needed to
accommodate new development. With respect to affordable housing, options such as a
rebate program is being explored as a means of encouraging new construction. The City will
hold a public meeting on June 24 to provide an opportunity for stakeholder input on this
issue. The proposed by-law is expected to be tabled for approval at Council in July 1999.
A "housing first" policy has been adopted by the City to facilitate the development of new
affordable housing stock. A report (May 3, 1999) entitled "Housing First Policy for Surplus
City-owned Property" is also before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on
June 1, 1999. This report outlines a proposal for a City, Housing First Policy. The report
also recommends that the City commit to creating 900 affordable housing units over the next
three years. In addition, that City staff report on the development of a five year capital
program for housing with financing options that would include use of the Capital Revolving
Fund.
The City has also created an interdepartmental Property Management Committee which
could function as one forum for reviewing options pertaining to city-owned land for
affordable housing.
The Province has offered to make government-owned land available and will be
commissioning an affordable housing design competition. The City welcomes this initiative
and will seek to establish a process for working with the Province to identify potential sites.
The City has created a $10.9 million Capital Revolving Fund to assist in the development of
new affordable housing and is partnering with the private and non-profit sector on several
affordable housing demonstration projects. A reference group of private-sector
representatives and others has been set up to provide expert advice in the operations of the
fund. City staff are also initiating a proposal for a study and design "charette" on what
models of singles housing suit what types of low-income single people.
Toronto has called on the Federal government to create a $300 million annual capital
program for low-income housing. The City will also ask the Federal government to increase
mortgage and financing assistance make government-owned land available for affordable
housing development. In addition, the City will urge the Province to support municipal
affordable housing partnerships through measures such as capital grants/equity or a role in
lending, where it has existing capability.
(3) Addressing Affordability Issues:
A growing number of people are struggling to afford rental housing rates in Toronto. Rents
have been rising while tenant incomes have stayed the same or fallen. In an effort to address
some of the affordabiltiy issues, the City will implement a consistent approach on the use of
Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure public benefits in exchange for extra height and/or
density. The former City of Toronto secured a wide variety of benefits in this way (e.g.,
social housing, workplace daycare, community service space), providing most of the funds
for the Capital Revolving Fund. Council has approved continuation of this practice of using
Section 37 to secure public benefits for affordable housing.
Rent supplements are needed to cover the gap between market and affordable rents. The
Province has announced a commitment to spend $50 million in savings on rent supplements
from the pending Provincial/Federal Social Housing Agreement, reallocating $2.5 million
over the next three years from expiring rent supplement contracts to help house 300-400
people with special needs. The City will seek input on the design of the rent supplement
with a goal of immediate implementation.
The City will explore issues related to rooming houses as proposed by the Task Force. Staff
will report at a later date following an interdepartmental and community consultation
process.
Social Housing Savings:
The City is realizing approximately $5 to 7 million in social housing savings as old mortgages on
city housing projects are renegotiated at today's lower interest rates. These funds will be placed in
the Mayor's Homeless Initiatives Fund.
--------
Appendix B
Municipal Operating Expenditures for Homeless Services
City Budget 1998 City Budget 1999
Expenditure |
Gross
(million $)
|
Revenue
(million $)
|
Net
(million $)
|
Gross
(million $)
|
%
Incr.
|
Revenue
(million $)
|
Net
(million $)
|
%
Inc.
|
Emergency
Shelter |
59,189,000 |
43,098,000
(Province)
|
16,091,000 |
69,057,000 |
17
|
47,655,000
(Province)
|
21,402,000 |
33
|
Grants to
Homeless
Services |
2,200,000 |
0.00
|
2,200,000 |
7,003,700 |
218
|
4,724,000
(Province)
|
2,297,700 |
4
|
Totals
|
61,318,756 |
43,098,000 |
18,291,000 |
76,060,700 |
24
|
52,379,000 |
23,699,700 |
30
|
--------
Municipal Capital Expenditures for Homeless Services
City Budget 1998 City Budget 1999
Expenditure |
Gross
|
Revenue
|
Net
|
Gross
|
%
Incr.
|
Revenue
|
Net
|
%
Inc.
|
Capital
Revolving
Fund |
|
|
|
$10,900,000 |
n/a
|
$0.00
|
$10,900,000 |
n/a
|
Provincial
Health and
Safety Grants |
$ 168,656 |
$ 168,656
(province)
|
$0.00
|
|
|
Not
determined
yet. |
|
|
Residential
Rehabilitation
Assistance
Program |
$ 1,150,100
(Federal
grants) |
|
|
$ 7,966,400
(Federal
grants)* |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
$ 1,318,756 |
$ 168,656 |
$0.00
|
$ 18,866,400 |
|
|
$10,900,000 |
|
* This number includes an estimated $6.5 million in one-time only additional RRAP funds for
1999 and $1,466,400.00 in regular RRAP grants for the former City of Toronto area.
These items have been approved through the City's 1999 budget process.
--------
Reserves from Social Housing
Expenditure
City Budget 1999
Source
Comments
Mayor's Homeless
Initiatives Fund
$5 - 7,000,000
Social Housing Savings
Staff report pending on
proposed use of fund.
--------
Appendix C
Recommendations that impact City of Toronto Operating Budget
Task Force Recommendations
|
City Response Recommendations
|
Task
Force
Rec No. |
Description of
Recommendation |
Task Force
Estimates of
Costs to City |
City Estimates
of Cost
for 1999 |
City Estimates
of Cost
for 2000 |
Comments |
1 |
Appoint a Facilitator for
Action on Homelessness |
$600,000
(for 5 years) |
to be
determined |
to be
determined |
Pending outcome of meeting
with Federal and Provincial
governments on
resources/structure required |
7 |
Hostel follow up program
(to help people out of
hostels, to maintain
housing and to reduce
recidivism) |
Funding from
redirected
savings
estimated by
Task Force at
$3 million |
$2.2 million
(phase in) * |
$4.4 million
(annualized) |
Pending outcome of meeting
with Federal and Provincial
governments on
resources/structure required |
37 |
Adjustment of Ontario
Works GTA shelter
component set to median
rents |
$6.5 million
(net) |
undetermined |
undetermined |
dependent upon case load and
contingent upon Provincial
approval to adjust benefit levels |
40 |
Rent Bank |
$500,000 |
$200,000
in current
budget |
$200,000 (+)
in current
budget |
Funding from City Homeless
Initiatives Fund and Provincial
(100%) Homeless Initiatives
Fund |
42 |
Purchase of Service
housing help at welfare
offices |
$300,000 |
undetermined |
undetermined |
Subject to program funding of
80:20 or administration funding
of 50:50 with Province. |
45 |
First and last months rent
for Ontario Works
recipients who move |
$3 million |
$9 million
shelter fund for
families with
children |
$9 million
shelter fund for
families with
children |
Fund through reinvested
National Child Benefit Savings |
50 |
Community Economic
Development programs
(annual for 3 years) |
$100,000 |
$150,000
in current
budget |
$150,000
in current
budget |
Currently in municipal grants
budget. City role in CED under
review |
88 |
Additional rent
supplement (100 %
municipal dollars, average
cost -1 to 3 yrs) |
$7 million |
undetermined |
undetermined |
Secured under Mayor's Task
Force reserve fund |
* Funding for these initiatives will be considered under the increase to Toronto's share of the Provincial
Homeless Initiatives Fund. This fund has been increased from $1.02 million annually to $4.724 million
annually. These are 100 percent Provincial dollars.
These items have been approved through the City's 1999 budget process.
Appendix D
Recommendations that impact City of Toronto Capital Budget
Task Force Recommendations to City
City Response to Recommendations
Task
ForceRec.
No.
Task Force
Recommendation
Task Force
Estimates to
City for 1999
City Estimates
of Cost for
1999
City Estimates
of Cost for
2000
Comments
4 & 5
24-hour Homeless
Service Info System and
bed registry with access
by all service providers
$300,000
(operating
costs)
$50,000 *
for feasibility
plan prior to
implementation
$300,000 -
$500,000
(operating
costs)
Funding secured
from Human
Resources and
Development Canada
for bed registry
8
Upgrade hostels
$500,000
(annual for
5 years)
to be
determined
to be
determined
City recommends
Province establish
capital fund
11
Health and safety
upgrades in drop-ins
$300,000
(annual over
3 - 5 years)
$50,000 *
for facilities
audit
to be
determined
City recommends
Province establish
capital fund.
A facilities audit is
needed to assess
need in the sector.
13
Food equipment for drop-ins
$100,000
(annual over
3 - 5 years)
to be
determined
to be
determined
City recommends
Province establish
capital fund
77
City "Homelessness
Community Fund"
$10 million
$10.9 million
in current
budget
undetermined
Represents the City's
Capital Revolving
Fund approved by
Council in February
1999
* Funding for these initiatives will be considered under the increase to Toronto's share of the Provincial
Homeless Initiatives Fund. This fund has been increased from $1.02 million annually to $4.724 million
annually. These are 100 percent Provincial dollars.
These items have been approved through the City's 1999 budget process.
6
Community Based Affordable Housing
Demonstration Project
647-657 Lawrence Avenue West at Allen Road
(Ward 8 - North York Spadina)
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk, subject to inserting the following new Recommendation
No. (2) in the joint report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services and the Commissioner of Corporate Services; and renumbering the
remaining Recommendations accordingly:
"(2) Council declare surplus the property known as number
647-657 Lawrence Avenue West for the purposes of, and to the extent
required by, the lease recommended herein, and that the appropriate
City Officials take all steps necessary to give effect to By-law
No. 551-1998;";
so that the Recommendations embodied in the aforementioned joint report now reads as
follows:
"It is recommended that:
(1) the business case from Out of the Cold and Congregation Darchei Noam
for below market rental housing be accepted as an Affordable Housing
Demonstration Project;
(2) Council declare surplus the property known as number
647-657 Lawrence Avenue West for the purposes of, and to the extent
required by, the lease recommended herein, and that the appropriate
City Officials take all steps necessary to give effect to By-law
No. 551-1998;
(3) vacant lands at 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West previously withheld
from sale be leased to the not-for-profit corporation to be established
jointly by Out of the Cold and Congregation Darchei Noam for a term
of 49 years at a rate of $2.00 per year, subject to terms and conditions
which are satisfactory to the Commissioner of Corporate Services and
the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services and in a
form acceptable to the City Solicitor;
(4) the continued provision of below-market rental units by the
not-for-profit group be secured through the review provisions in the
land lease agreement with the City;
(5) subject to the final approval of the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services, that the following funds be provided from the
Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing:
(a) a capital grant of $10,000.00 per unit to a maximum of
$240,000.00; and
(b) a no-interest, second mortgage of up to $600,000.00, for a
maximum of 35 years, to be repaid to the Capital Revolving Fund
from net cash flow;
(6) the final amount of the second mortgage from the Capital Revolving
Fund for Affordable Housing be adjusted by the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services to reflect the budget
reductions from the use of innovative building technologies, budget
refinements, or other cost-saving measures;
(7) in order to reduce the cost of private construction financing, City
officials are authorized to disburse the capital grant from the Capital
Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing to the not-for-profit corporation
as soon as possible after the building permit is issued;
(8) Council agree in principle that all planning, development and building
permit fees and charges for 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West, should be
waived or forgiven and that:
(a) the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services
waive all application fees or costs of giving notice under The
Planning Act;
(b) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and
Tourism and the Commissioner of Urban Planning and
Development Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor,
report by September 1999, on the measures required to exempt
this development from building permit fees and the payment in
lieu of parkland; and
(c) Toronto Hydro be requested to waive or forgo any required
connection fee or charge;
(9) the cost of the 22-metre centre median on Lawrence Avenue West
required as a condition of previous site plan approval be provided for in
the 2000 Works and Emergency Services capital budget. The current
estimated construction cost is $8,000.00;
(10) the lease commencement date, the advancement of the capital grant and
second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable
Housing be conditional upon the not-for-profit group obtaining a first
mortgage commitment within six months of the zoning by-law for the
lands coming in to force."
(11) City officials be authorized to take such actions as are required to
implement these recommendations; and
(12) City Council request the Federal Government to rebate the GST for this
community based affordable housing project.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendations:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the joint report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services and the Commissioner of Corporate Services, as amended
by the Corporate Services Committee, subject to adding the following Recommendation:
"(11) that City Council request the Federal Government to rebate the GST for this
community based affordable housing project."
The Budget Committee reports, for the information of Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
and Council, having requested the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to
ensure that in every instance where subsidized units are created by the City, the residents of such
units must be from the City's existing prioritized waiting list and/or from shelter housing.
Background:
The Budget Committee had before it a communication (May 20, 1999) from the City Clerk advising
that the Corporate Services Committee on May 20, 1999, recommended to the Budget Committee,
and Council, the adoption of the joint report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community
and Neighbourhood Services and the Commissioner of Corporate Services, subject to:
(1) amending Recommendation No. (2) by deleting the words "on a long term basis at an initial"
and inserting in lieu thereof the words "for a term of 49 years at a", so that such
Recommendation now reads as follows:
"(2) vacant lands at 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West previously withheld from
sale be leased to the not-for-profit corporation to be established jointly by Out
of the Cold and Congregation Darchei Noam for a term of 49 years at a rate
of $2.00 per year, subject to terms and conditions which are satisfactory to
the Commissioner of Corporate Services and the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services and in a form acceptable to the City
Solicitor;" and
(2) amending Recommendation No. (9) by adding before the word "advancement" the words
"lease commencement date, the" so that such Recommendation now reads as follows:
"(9) the lease commencement date, the advancement of the capital grant and
second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing
be conditional upon the not-for-profit group obtaining a first mortgage
commitment within six months of the zoning by-law for the lands coming in
to force."
Ms. Joanne Campbell, General Manager, Shelter Housing and Support Division, Community and
Neighbourhood Services, appeared before the Budget Committee in connection with the foregoing
matter.
--------
(Communication dated May 20, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the City Clerk)
Recommendations:
The Corporate Services Committee on May 20, 1999, recommended to the Budget Committee, and
Council, the adoption of the joint report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services and the Commissioner of Corporate Services subject to:
(1) amending Recommendation No. (2) by deleting the words "on a long term basis at an initial"
and inserting in lieu thereof the words "for a term of 49 years at a", so that such
Recommendation now reads as follows:
"(2) vacant lands at 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West previously withheld from
sale be leased to the not-for-profit corporation to be established jointly by Out
of the Cold and Congregation Darchei Noam for a term of 49 years at a rate
of $2.00 per year, subject to terms and conditions which are satisfactory to
the Commissioner of Corporate Services and Commissioner of Community
and Neighbourhood Services and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor;"
and
(2) amending Recommendation No. (9) by adding before the word "advancement" the words
"lease commencement date, the" so that such Recommendation now reads as follows:
"(9) the lease commencement date, the advancement of the capital grant and
second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing
be conditional upon the not-for-profit group obtaining a first mortgage
commitment within six months of the zoning by-law for the lands coming in
to force."
Background:
The Corporate Services Committee at its meeting on May 20, 1999, had before it a joint report
(May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services and the
Commissioner of Corporate Services, recommending that as a result of a request for proposals issued
by the City of Toronto for City-owned land at 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West, and with the advice
of the Reference Group for the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing:
(1) the business case from Out of the Cold and Congregation Darchei Noam for below market
rental housing be accepted as an Affordable Housing Demonstration Project.
(2) vacant lands at 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West previously withheld from sale be leased to
the not-for-profit corporation to be established jointly by Out of the Cold and Congregation
Darchei Noam on a long-term basis at an initial rate of $2.00 per year, subject to terms and
conditions which are satisfactory to the Commissioner of Corporate Services and the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services and in a form acceptable to the
City Solicitor;
(3) the continued provision of below-market rental units by the not-for-profit group be secured
through the review provisions in the land lease agreement with the City;
(4) subject to the final approval of the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services, that the following funds be provided from the Capital Revolving Fund for
Affordable Housing:
(a) a capital grant of $10,000.00 per unit to a maximum of $240,000.00; and
(b) a no-interest, second mortgage of up to $600,000.00, for a maximum of 35 years, to
be repaid to the Capital Revolving Fund from net cash flow;
(5) the final amount of the second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable
Housing be adjusted by the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to
reflect the budget reductions from the use of innovative building technologies, budget
refinements, or other cost-saving measures;
(6) in order to reduce the cost of private construction financing, City officials are authorized to
disburse the capital grant from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing to the
not-for-profit corporation as soon as possible after the building permit is issued;
(7) Council agree in principle that all planning, development and building permit fees and
charges for 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West, should be waived or forgiven and that:
(a) the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services waive all
application fees or costs of giving notice under The Planning Act;
(b) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services, in consultation with
the City Solicitor, report by September 1999, on the measures required to exempt this
development from building permit fees and the payment in lieu of parkland; and
(c) Toronto Hydro be requested to waive or forgo any required connection fee or charge;
(8) the cost of the 22-metre centre median on Lawrence Avenue West required as a condition
of previous site plan approval be provided for in the 2000 Works and Emergency Services
capital budget. The current estimated construction cost is $8,000.00;
(9) the advancement of the capital grant and second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund
for Affordable Housing be conditional upon the not-for-profit group obtaining a first
mortgage commitment within six months of the zoning by-law for the lands coming in to
force; and
(10) City officials be authorized to take such actions as are required to implement these
recommendations.
--------
(Joint report dated May 4, 1999, addressed to the
Corporate Services Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services
and the Commissioner of Corporate Services)
Purpose:
To request:
(i) approval for the lease of the City-owned land at Lawrence Avenue West and Allen Road to
a not-for-profit community group to allow the group to construct 24 units of affordable and
below-market rental housing;
(ii) approval of the business case for financial assistance, as recommended by the Advisory
Reference Group of the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing; and
(iii) approval to request the Province and Federal Government to contribute capital or operating
funds to the project or forgo development and tax revenue.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing:
The Capital Revolving Fund is recommended as the primary source of City funds to facilitate the
Demonstration Project. A capital grant of $10,000.00 per unit and a no-interest second mortgage
from the Fund is proposed as it will enable the community group to secure private mortgage funding
for the majority of the cost.
Delayed and Foregone Revenue:
There is an impact on potential revenues as it is recommended that all planning, development and
building fees be waived. It is further recommended that the land be leased to the not-for-profit
community group at a nominal rate, thereby delaying the short-term achievement of revenue from
the sale of the land. The market value of the land was previously estimated at $322,000.00 in late
1995. A current appraisal is being obtained.
Capital Budget:
There would be a very small increase of $8,000.00 in next year's Works and Emergency Services
capital budget for minor traffic management measures on Lawrence Avenue West.
Increase in City Revenues:
City revenues would increase in the first year of the development through the payment of
approximately $33,700.00 in annual reality taxes. Currently no tax revenue is generated as the
property is vacant and is not entered in the City's tax rolls. From the second year onwards, an
escalating repayment of the second mortgage would begin to the Capital Revolving Fund for
Affordable Housing.
Operating Grants:
No operating grants are to be provided by the City. Program support will be provided by existing
organizations from their established budgets. The not-for-profit community group is providing a
minimum of $360,000.00 towards the capital cost of construction and other donations of goods and
services are being sought.
Cost Reduction:
By diverting people from the hostel system, emergency shelter costs to the City could be reduced by
up to $261,000.00 annually.
Recommendations:
As a result of a request for proposals issued by the City of Toronto for City-owned land at
647-657 Lawrence Avenue West, and with the advice of the Reference Group for the Capital
Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing, it is recommended that:
(1) the business case from Out of the Cold and Congregation Darchei Noam for below market
rental housing be accepted as an Affordable Housing Demonstration Project;
(2) vacant lands at 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West previously withheld from sale be leased to
the not-for-profit corporation to be established jointly by Out of the Cold and Congregation
Darchei Noam on a long-term basis at an initial rate of $2.00 per year, subject to terms and
conditions which are satisfactory to the Commissioner of Corporate Services and Community
and Neighbourhood Services and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor;
(3) the continued provision of below-market rental units by the not-for-profit group be secured
through the review provisions in the land lease agreement with the City;
(4) subject to the final approval of the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services, that the following funds be provided from the Capital Revolving Fund for
Affordable Housing:
(a) a capital grant of $10,000.00 per unit to a maximum of $240,000.00; and
(b) a no-interest, second mortgage of up to $600,000.00, for a maximum of 35 years, to
be repaid to the Capital Revolving Fund from net cash flow;
(5) the final amount of the second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable
Housing be adjusted by the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to
reflect the budget reductions from the use of innovative building technologies, budget
refinements, or other cost-saving measures;
(6) in order to reduce the cost of private construction financing, City officials are authorized to
disburse the capital grant from the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing to the
not-for-profit corporation as soon as possible after the building permit is issued;
(7) Council agree in principle that all planning, development and building permit fees and
charges for 647-657 Lawrence Avenue West, should be waived or forgiven and that:
(a) the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services waive all
application fees or costs of giving notice under The Planning Act;
(b) the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services, in consultation with
the City Solicitor, report by September 1999, on the measures required to exempt this
development from building permit fees and the payment in lieu of parkland; and
(c) Toronto Hydro be requested to waive or forgo any required connection fee or charge;
(8) the cost of the 22-metre centre median on Lawrence Avenue West required as a condition
of previous site plan approval be provided for in the 2000 Works and Emergency Services
capital budget; the current estimated construction cost is $8,000.00;
(9) the advancement of the capital grant and second mortgage from the Capital Revolving Fund
for Affordable Housing be conditional upon the not-for-profit group obtaining a first
mortgage commitment within six months of the zoning by-law for the lands coming in to
force; and
(10) City officials be authorized to take such actions as are required to implement these
recommendations.
Background:
Selection Process:
In July of 1998 Council considered a report from the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services to the Council Strategy Committee for People Without Homes. On the basis
of the report, Council directed staff to proceed with affordable housing projects that would
demonstrate new models of housing and respond to the needs of a range of target groups in Toronto.
The adopted strategy was for the City to facilitate the delivery of the targeted housing by community
sponsors and the private sector. The City of Toronto would "seed" the projects through the use of
City-owned sites, waiving of development fees and limited capital contributions from reserve funds
for housing. Actual development and long-term operation would be by the community sponsor or
the private sector.
A small City-owned site was identified. It had been approved in principle for 24 apartment units
under the Provincially-sponsored social housing program. Just before the building permit was to be
issued, the Province terminated the housing program and the development was abandoned.
After consultation with the local councillors a two-stage Request for Proposals was issued to
community groups. The Request for Proposals asked that the majority of units be targeted to single
parents with children who may be living in emergency or hostel accommodation.
Target Population:
A significant portion of the families in the hostel system are mother-led with one or more children,
generally less than 16 years of age. They would likely have been in the shelter and hostel system for
a significant period of time, or in danger of ending up in the system because of domestic abuse or
economic set backs. Many have cycled through various temporary housing situations, creating a
variety of problems, particularly for children, due to the instability of constant relocation. Others may
be sharing with friends or relatives in an overcrowded or unsuitable situation. Many are on long
social housing waiting lists.
Housing Model:
The needs of these families are largely related to economic conditions and the inability to find
suitable housing. They require stability, and in the case of abused women, security. These families
need housing which will allow them to work on other issues in their lives and eventually have the
option of moving to more independent housing.
While certainly not "hard-to-house", this group nonetheless requires voluntary access to support
services, which may be provided on site, and would contribute to the transition to fully independent
living.
An appropriate transitional housing model would provide housing suitable for women with children,
and offer flexibility or variety in order to serve a range of family sizes and living styles. Units may
be entirely self-contained, with common areas, or include shared components such as kitchens,
living, recreation or employment space. Operationally, the long-term operating cost of the project
must be self-sufficient based on the incomes of the target group, which is usually the shelter
component of social assistance benefits.
Support services might include employment counselling and referral, childcare, settlement and
literacy or language services, health, nutrition and home management and parenting skills. Some
require access to educational facilities. For children, specialized services might include personal
counselling and school liaison to deal with issues surrounding instability in their lives, and recreation
or socialization opportunities.
Supply of Affordable Rental Housing:
The Mayor's Task Force on Homelessness documented a need for 2,000 new low rent units annually
just to keep pace with the new demand. These units are required only to prevent low-income housing
needs from worsening. Even with historically high level of production, it would not even address the
needs of existing tenants, 23 percent of which have an affordability problem caused be declining
incomes coupled with increasing rents and low vacancy rates.
Further the Task Force analyzed the costs for developing new rental housing. The economic monthly
rent required to allow the private sector to produce new units is in the range of $1,300.00 to 1,400.00
while the market rents were in the range of $835.00 to $947.00. Consultants to the development
industry expect a few hundred new private high-rent units to be started in the next year or two,
mostly in downtown or subway locations. This will add to the high-end rental units produced each
year in the form of condominium apartments that are rented out. While this adds to the overall supply
and reduces the pressure on the vacancy levels, the trickle-down effects for lower income tenants
will be modest and long-term.
The inescapably conclusion is that basic development economics prevent the private sector from
meeting low-income housing needs.
The significant challenge for the not-for-profit group is to build new housing that can be afforded
by the target group i.e., the shelter component of welfare which is currently $554.00 per month for
a family of three. This is about 40 percent of the rent level required for the private sector to deliver
the same units.
Comments:
At its meeting of April 26, 1999, the Corporate Services Committee received an information report
on the results of a request for proposals under the Affordable Housing Demonstration Projects
framework adopted by Council in July 1998. This report detailed the two-stage request for proposals
selection process that resulted in the preliminary acceptance of the Out of the Cold/Darchei Noam
proposal as the working model for the refinement of the financial plan.
Business Case:
Staff and the Reference Group have now reviewed the business case and detailed financial program.
At its meeting of May 4, 1999, the Reference Group received a presentation from members of the
proposed Board of Directors of the new not-for-profit corporation now being formed specifically for
this development. Members of the new Board are drawn from the Out of the Cold and Congregation
Darchei Noam.
The Board submitted to the Reference Group a profile of the members of the Board of Directors and
the organizational structure adopted for the development phase. (Appendix "B").
A financial presentation was made by the Board. The Board detailed a capital budget - development
pro forma - (Appendix "C") and an operating budget with a 10-year financial projection
(Appendix "D"). Finally the operational housing model was presented and discussed (outline in
Appendix "E") and features of the site plan were outlined (Appendix "F").
Staff and the Reference Group have reviewed the capital and operating budgets. The costs and
expenses are reflective of a modest unit proposal and well within industry standards. In addition they
are within the range of the costs of development detailed in the background studies for The Mayor's
Task Force.
The not-for-profit group is providing 17 of the 24 units at a rent that is only 40 percent of the rent
normally required to support this construction. As a result this new below-market rental housing
clearly would not happen without government support.
Financial Support:
The items of financial support are as recommended in The Mayor's Task Force. Further the level of
assistance from the City proposed for 647-657 Lawrence West is in line with the financial models
detailed in The Mayor's Task Force. The following items are listed in the proposed capital budget
enclosed with this report:
(i) a long-term land lease at an initial nominal rate of $2.00 per year;
(ii) a capital grant of $10,000.00 per unit to total $240,000.00;
(iii) a second mortgage of up to $25,000.00 per unit to a maximum of $600,000.00; and
(iv) waiving or foregoing of planning, development and building fee revenues.
Initial proposals for the new Development Charges By-law contain a proposal to exempt affordable
rental housing from the charge. Waiving or forgoing other fees and charges requires the authorization
of Council.
Wise Use of City Resources:
There is a basic choice for the City to make: either provide grants and loans up front from the
existing Capital Revolving Fund to generate new affordable rental units or pay annually from
on-going budget allocations to provide emergency shelter accommodation. The proposed
development at 647-657 Lawrence could house up to 55 people at below-market rents. If this same
number of people were to be housed in the emergency shelter system, the yearly costs would be
$875,000.00. Under the existing capped cost-sharing formula, $261,000.00 of the savings would
accrue to the City of Toronto and $615,000.00 to the Province.
Savings, Taxes and Revenues to Others:
The facilitation of this development by the City of Toronto will generate the following savings or
direct revenues for other levels of government and the private sector:
(i) $615,000.00 annual savings to the Province for hostel costs (discussed above);
(ii) $16,673.00 in P.S.T. to the Province (announced rebate of $48,000.00 already discounted);
(iii) $63,218.00 in G.S.T. to the Federal government;
(iv) $3,600.00 in underwriting fees to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation;
(v) up to $75,602.00 in mortgage insurance premiums to CMHC;
(vi) $28,357.00 in interest for private construction financing; and
(vii) $105,262.00 annually in virtually risk free mortgage payments to the private sector.
On this basis, the Federal government could be requested to contribute an amount equal to the G.S.T.
while CMHC could be asked to waive its fee and to provide direct mortgage financing, as was the
norm for over 30 years after World War II.
The above proposals in regards to the G.S.T and direct mortgage lending would implement
Recommendations Nos. (81) and (83) of The Mayor's Task Force on Homelessness.
Conclusion:
The proposal outlined in this report is a prototype of what can be done with the resources provided
to the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing. Approval of the business case and financial
plan by the City of Toronto will result in the production of new affordable rental housing. It is also
cost-effective because the development will provide long-term savings to the City's operating budget
by reducing the cost of providing emergency shelter accommodation.
Significant funds and volunteer time are being provided by the community. Further, while ongoing
affordability is secured through the terms of the land lease, there are no annual City grants.
Contact Name:
Joanne Campbell, Phone: 392-7885, Fax: 392-0548
--------
Appendix "A"
Expected Planning, Development and Building Fees
647-657 Lawrence Avenue West
Based Upon a 24 unit Apartment Building
with a Mix of one, two and three Bedrooms
Official Plan Amendment Application paid by previous applicant
Zoning Amendment Application paid by previous applicant
Site Plan Application paid by previous applicant
Cost of giving notice of passing of zoning by-law $200.00 estimated
Amend/extend existing Site Plan Approval $540.00
Building Permit - $12.00 per square metre $31,346.00 estimated
payment in lieu of parkland - 5 percent of land value $16,100.00 to $20,000.00
Development Charges - North York by-law $34,824.00
Sewer and Water - North York by-law $16,488.00
Hydro Connection - $84.00 per unit $2,016.00
Or as amended from time to time by the City of Toronto
The proposed New Development Charges By-law would replace the current former City of North
York Development Charges and Sewer and Water Charge listed above with a charge of $67,688.00.
(A copy of Appendices B, C, D and E referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all
Members of Council with the May 20, 1999, agenda of the Corporate Services Committee and the
June 1, 1999, agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and a copy thereof is also
on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
7
Housing First Policy for Surplus City-owned Property
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that, as a matter of policy, whenever City land or funding is used
to lever below market rents in housing projects, applicants for that housing be drawn from
social housing waiting lists or from the shelter system.")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendations of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the joint report (May 3, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services, the Commissioner of Corporate Services, and the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services.
The Budget Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee and Council, having requested the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services to ensure that in every instance where subsidized units are created by the City, the residents
of such units must be from the City's existing prioritized waiting list and/or from shelter housing.
Background:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, had before it a communication (May 20, 1999) from the
City Clerk advising that the Corporate Services Committee on May 20, 1999, recommended to the
Budget Committee, and Council, the adoption of the joint report (May 3, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, the Commissioner of Corporate Services
and the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services, wherein it is recommended
that:
(1) a Housing First policy, as outlined in the Appendix 'A', be adopted;
(2) a target of levering the development of a minimum of 900 affordable housing units on
City-owned sites within the next three years be adopted, and staff report back on a quarterly
basis on the progress of the Housing First policy;
(3) the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the
Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, develop a
five-year capital program for housing and report back on the financing of such a program
including the use of the Capital Revolving Fund and the method of obtaining future
contributions to this Fund; and
(4) the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the steps necessary to give effect to these
recommendations.
--------
(Communication dated May 20, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the City Clerk)
Recommendation:
The Corporate Services Committee on May 20, 1999, recommended to the Budget Committee, and
Council, the adoption of the joint report (May 3, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services, the Commissioner of Corporate Services, and the Commissioner of Urban
Planning and Development Services.
Background:
The Corporate Services Committee at its meeting on May 20, 1999, had before it a joint report
(May 3, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, the
Commissioner of Corporate Services, and the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development
Services, recommending that:
(1) a Housing First policy, as outlined in the Appendix 'A', be adopted;
(2) a target of levering the development of a minimum of 900 affordable housing units on
City-owned sites within the next three years be adopted, and staff report back on a quarterly
basis on the progress of the Housing First policy;
(3) the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the
Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, develop a
five-year capital program for housing and report back on the financing of such a program
including the use of the Capital Revolving Fund and the method of obtaining future
contributions to this Fund; and
(4) the appropriate Civic officials be authorized to take the steps necessary to give effect to these
recommendations.
--------
(Joint report dated May 3, 1999, addressed to the
Corporate Services Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services
the Commissioner of Corporate Services and the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services)
Purpose:
To implement Recommendation No. (76) of the Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force by
proposing a policy to make suitable surplus City-owned property available for affordable housing
purposes.
Financial Implications:
The approval of a Housing First policy will allocate sites for housing purposes and, as set out in the
Financial Considerations section in this report, other City initiatives/objectives will be impacted as
a result of land being directed on a priority basis to housing. The individual financial implications
are to be determined on a site-by-site basis, supported by a business case for the proposed use.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) a Housing First policy, as outlined in the Appendix 'A', be adopted;
(2) a target of levering the development of a minimum of 900 affordable housing units on
City-owned sites within the next three years be adopted, and staff report back on a quarterly
basis on the progress of the Housing First policy;
(3) the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the
Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, develop a
five-year capital program for housing and report back on the financing of such a program
including the use of the Capital Revolving Fund and the method of obtaining future
contributions to this Fund; and
(4) the appropriate Civic officials be authorized to take the steps necessary to give effect to these
recommendations.
Background:
City Council, at its meeting of July 29, 30 and 31, 1998, approved with minor amendments a report
(Clause No. 1 of Report No. 11 of The Corporate Services Committee) entitled "Acquisition and
Disposal of Real Property" dealing with various real estate issues, including a process to declare
properties surplus to the City's requirements (see flow chart Appendix 'B'). The disposal process
provides for Real Estate staff to consult with the City's agencies, boards, commissions and
departments on whether a property is required for municipal purposes. The recently established
Property Management Committee ('PMC') reviews all requests for the allocation of property and
determines whether sites should be recommended for disposal.
At the same meeting, Council also adopted a strategy to encourage the creation of affordable housing
and a framework for demonstration projects (Clause No. 7 of Report No. 7 of The Community and
Neighbourhood Services Committee). Council agreed in principle to provide surplus City-owned
land and buildings for community affordable housing projects, as a first priority. On February 2, 3
and 4, 1999, Council by adoption of Clause No. 13 of Report No. 2 of The Strategic Policies and
Priorities Committee established a Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing and provided
$10 million dollars largely from the Social Housing Reserve Fund.
Recommendation No. (76) of the report of the Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force
(January, 1999) states: "The City should develop a 'housing first' policy for municipal lands to
make suitable sites available for affordable housing..."
Comments:
Rationale for Providing City Land for Housing Affordable Purposes:
Financial pro-formas for new rental construction show that returns are potentially sufficient that such
housing could now be built for high-end rent levels. In order to produce housing for low-income
households, government incentives are needed to bring down the development costs of such housing.
The report of the Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force suggests that all levels of government
have a role to play in providing such incentives.
The Mayor's Task Force identifies the following four tasks for the municipality:
(1) initiating a framework for partnership between the three levels of government and the private
and non-profit sector;
(2) making sites available for housing development;
(3) providing limited financial support through a capital fund; and
(4) reducing taxes and charges for affordable housing projects.
It is noted that the provision of land for affordable rental units (i.e., if leased to a community
developer at a nominal fee) can reduce development costs by more than 15 percent. It is
recommended by the Task Force that all levels of government make suitable government sites
available for affordable housing.
There are precedents for the contribution of land for affordable housing purposes. Vancouver, in the
early 1990's, provided land on a deferred-return basis for the development of 1,150 rental units.
Today, some public-private partnerships, such as those assisted by Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corporation's Partnerships Centre, are using land contributed by church groups or service clubs.
Recently (March 23, 1999), the Provincial Government announced that it would be making available
government-owned land for the development of a minimum of 500 units of affordable rental
housing.
Proposed Housing First Policy:
The Appendix provides a proposed Housing First policy for surplus City-owned real property. The
intent of the policy is to provide direction for the current process of assessing potentially surplus sites
and preparing them for disposition. A variety of possible forms of assistance to housing providers
exist. One form would be making City-owned property available, possibly for nominal
consideration. In doing so, attention will need to be exercised in order to maintain compliance with
the bonusing prohibition in the Municipal Act.
To measure the effectiveness of this policy it is proposed that a target be set for the creation of
affordable housing units as a direct result of these actions by the City. A target of 900 units to be
approved by Council as a result of Requests for Proposal ('RFP') within the next three years is
recommended.
Financial Considerations:
The approval of a Housing First policy will allocate sites for housing purposes. Staff have
previously been directed to maximize the revenue from the sale of surplus properties by disposing
of those properties which were previously surplus to the City's requirements as well as those
properties which were freed up as a result of amalgamation. It was the intention to utilize the
revenue generated thereby to fund capital and operating budget shortfalls and utilize those funds for
other initiatives. The Facilities and Real Estate staff have previously proposed that a certain portion
of the funds generated be allocated to capital maintenance for the City's remaining property
portfolio. As a result of the approval of the proposed Housing First policy, other City
initiatives/objectives may be impacted due to land being directed on a priority basis to housing.
Facilities and Real Estate staff will provide an estimate of market value when the Property
Management Committee is considering requests in order that the Committee can make a fully
informed decision. However, the level of financial return for a particular property can only be
determined once the proposed housing type and tenure is decided and, accordingly, the individual
financial implications can only be determined on a site-by-site basis.
In initial response to the Task Force Report's Recommendation No. (77), Council established a
Capital Revolving Fund of $10.9 million dollars. Council has not yet dealt with its long-term
approach to capital funding of housing. To this end, it is recommended that the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the Chief Administrative Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, develop a five-year capital program for housing and report
back on the financing of such a program including the use of the Capital Revolving Fund and the
method of obtaining future contributions to this Fund.
The Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer were consulted in
the preparation of this report and are in agreement with its content and recommendations.
Conclusions:
The Mayor's Homelessness Action Task Force stated that all levels of government, the private
sector, and the community-based sector should be combined in a City-led housing partnership. One
of the four specific roles identified for the City was to make municipal land available by adopting
a "housing first" policy for surplus and potentially surplus sites.
Allocating City-owned land resources to community groups and the private sector for housing will
directly produce new units of affordable housing while strongly demonstrating the City's
commitment to other levels of government. The Housing First policy report will focus on providing
a new land base for the production of affordable housing while protecting the City's operational
requirements for land.
Contact Name:
Joanne Campbell, Phone: 392-7885, Fax: 392-0548, Mr. Doug Stewart, Phone: 392-7202,
Fax: 392-1880, Ms. Barbara Leonhardt, Phone: 392-8148, Fax: 392-3821.
--------
Appendix 'A'
Proposed Housing First Policy for City-owned Property
The goal of the City's affordable housing strategy (Clause No. 7 of Report No. 7 of the Community
and Neighbourhood Services Committee, adopted by City Council on July 29, 30 and 31, 1998) is
to create an environment in which the private sector and community partners will be willing and able
to develop affordable housing for people with a range of housing needs that are not currently being
met in the market. The Housing First policy supports this strategy by using suitable City-owned
property to lever the creation of affordable housing by the private sector and community non-profit
groups.
Principle of "Housing First":
The first priority in the decision making process respecting surplus or potentially surplus City-owned
real property should be affordable housing development. For the purposes of this policy the
definition of affordable housing shall be as determined from time to time by the Council of the new
City of Toronto.
Objectives for a Housing First Policy:
The objectives of the proposed Housing First policy are as follows:
(1) to identify and make suitable City-owned sites (land and/or buildings) available to
community groups for the provision of long- term affordable housing;
(2) to forgo or defer revenues from such sites, where it can be demonstrated that long-term
affordable housing will be created as a result;
(3) to require the inclusion of affordable housing in the development of City sites that have the
potential for multiple land uses;
(4) to facilitate the distribution of affordable housing development across all areas of the City,
based on community needs and appropriate community consultation; and
(5) to lever participation of senior levels of government, the private sector and non-profit
community groups in the provision of affordable housing, for example, where funds from the
sale of sites are committed under prior agreement to the Province, the City could request the
Province to make those funds available for housing.
Elements of a Housing First Policy:
The following policy will apply to all property owned by the City, including that under the
operational jurisdiction of its agencies, boards and commissions.
Sites for Affordable Housing:
(1) Review of Potentially Surplus Property for Affordable Housing Potential:
As properties are identified as being no longer required for their current use, the City's Real
Estate staff undertake a circulation to the City's agencies, boards, commissions and
departments (ABCDs) and local Councillors to determine if there is any other municipal
interest in retaining the property for alternative uses or if the property should be declared
surplus to the City's requirements. A determination should also be made as to whether there
are any statutory, title, by-law, contractual or other legal provisions constraining the use or
disposition of that property. If interest is expressed in retaining the property, the ABCD is
requested to complete a business case submission providing preliminary details on the
proposed use of the property for consideration and decision by the Property Management
Committee (PMC). If there are competing interests, affordable housing shall have first
priority, unless in the opinion of the PMC, there is an overriding City interest.
Under the disposal process, the General Manager, Shelter Housing and Support, is notified
of potentially surplus properties for her determination of the site's suitability for affordable
housing initiatives. Housing staff will coordinate their interest with the Ward Councillors
prior to submitting their preliminary business case. The PMC, in considering the General
Manager's preliminary business case submission could temporarily withhold the site from
disposal. Temporarily withholding a site from sale allows the General Manager time for
detailed consultations with City planning staff, other relevant service areas, local Councillors
and to issue a Request for Proposals to identify developer interest. As a result of the
foregoing process, a final report will be submitted to the PMC, and after PMC consideration
of same, a report will be submitted for consideration by Corporate Services Committee and
Council on the proposed use and appropriate means of achieving the City's housing
objectives. If the housing business case is not satisfactory to the PMC, then consideration
will be given to other expressed interests. If no other interest has been expressed,
consideration will be given to disposal on the open market.
Sites with affordable housing potential would fall into two categories: those of modest size
with potential for the development of a single-purpose affordable housing development; and
larger sites with the potential for multiple use development with an affordable housing
component.
(2) Process for Single-Purpose Affordable Housing Sites:
Where the General Manager has determined that a site has potential for development of a
single-purpose affordable housing project, the report to the PMC will include a business plan
to support the use of the site for this purpose. The report will also recommend a process for
leasing the site to a community group or sale to a private developer through an open proposal
call process.
The target of the policy would be to identify and allocate a minimum of ten single-purpose
sites for affordable housing development by the end of 1999. The PMC should have
responsibility for ensuring that this target is met.
(3) Process for Multi-Use Affordable Housing Sites:
In the case of larger sites that have potential for mixed use development with an affordable
housing component, the General Manager's report to the PMC will describe the potential and
recommend a strategy for securing affordable housing benefits through sale of the site. This
may include dividing the site into smaller parcels or including specific requirements for
affordable housing targets in the sales agreement for the site.
The objective of the policy would be to secure 25 percent of the residential development
potential of the site as affordable housing. The PMC should have responsibility for ensuring
that this objective is met.
8
1998 Adjustments within Consolidated Grants
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the following
report (April 28, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services:
Purpose:
To obtain the appropriate approval and authority to release funds, in order to rectify a technical issue
resulting as an outcome of the December 15, 1998, Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
The 1998 year-end adjustments, established liabilities from available unexpended funds to
accommodate the one-time financial adjustments required in the AIDS Prevention Grants and Arts
and Culture Grants Programs. No new funds are required.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee formally approve the
recommendations put forth from the Budget Committee on December 8, 1998, including the
following:
(a) available funds in the 1998 consolidated grants budget be used to address one-time
financial adjustments required in the AIDS Prevention Grants Program up to
$526.4 thousand; and
(b) $288.9 thousand be used to address one-time financial adjustments required in the
Arts and Culture Grants Program.
Council Reference/Background/History:
During the course of 1998, two grant service areas were identified as requiring one-time adjustments
to bring the funding periods in-line with the municipal fiscal year. These grants and required
adjustments were: $526.5 thousand for the AIDS Prevention grants and $288.9 thousand in the Arts
and Culture grants.
Staff identified that available, unexpended grant funds in the 1998 consolidated budget could be used
for these purposes.
On November 20, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee recommended the use of available
funds in the 1998 consolidated grants budget to address one-time fiscal adjustments for the AIDS
Prevention Grants Program and the Arts and Culture Grants Program. Similarly, on December 8,
1998, Budget Committee recommended the same.
When the report was tabled at Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on December 15, 1998,
through an oversight it was received for information and therefore, was not formally recommended
to Council for approval. As a result, the problems associated with non-synchronized funding periods
and the requirement of pre-committing portions of the grants budget, remain despite an identified
solution.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
In order to rectify the outcome of the December 15, 1998, Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, the original Municipal Grants Review Committee and Budget Committee supported
recommendations are being re-submitted, for concurrence and approval.
Funding liabilities have been established within the 1998 Consolidated Grants Program budget to
accommodate the one-time financial adjustments for the AIDS Prevention Grants and the Arts and
Culture Grants. The funding period under the AIDS Prevention Program has been adjusted to
reflect this adjustment. Approval of these recommendations will provide the proper authority
regarding the release of the funds.
Conclusions:
In order to rectify a purely technical issue, formal approval is being sought again for the
Recommendations presented to Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on December 15, 1998.
Approval will provide the proper authority to release the funds, already accounted for as a liability
within the 1998 Consolidated Grants Program budget.
Contact Names:
Susan Bury - 392-8351
Chris Brillinger - 392-8608
9
Minor Recreation Grants -
Eligibility Assessment of New Applicants
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (April 28, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism respecting Minor Recreation Grants
- Eligibility Assessment of New Applicants, subject to amending Recommendation No. (3) to read
as follows:
"(3) Alexandra Park Community Centre secure an incorporated community organization
that has submitted a 1999 Minor Recreation application to act as trustee in order that
the application/program be reviewed."
The Municipal Grants Review Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and
Priorities Committee, having requested the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services, in consultation with appropriate Grants staff, to report to the new Grants Sub-Committee
of the Policy and Finance Committee on setting allocation priorities beginning in the year 2000 for
all high risk groups, i.e., youth, seniors etc.
--------
(Report dated April 28, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)
Purpose:
This report presents a summary of the eligibility assessment of new applicants within the 1999 Minor
Recreation Grants Program and seeks direction for one late returning applicant.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) Synchro Canada Centre of Excellence be declared ineligible under the Minor Recreation
Grants Program Eligibility Criteria;
(2) 519 Church Street Community Centre be declared ineligible under the Minor Recreation
Grants Program Eligibility Criteria;
(3) the Municipal Grants Review Committee provide direction with respect to the following
options:
(a) Alexandra Park Community Centre application be declared ineligible and the
application will not go forward for review; or
(b) Alexandra Park Community Centre secure an incorporated community organization
that has submitted a 1999 Minor Recreation application to act as trustee in order that
the application/program be reviewed.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At its meeting of September 28, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report
titled Recreation Grants Program Review that detailed the program guidelines for an amalgamated
Recreation Grants Program. Eligibility criteria for the 1999 grants cycle were revised and clarified
to meet standards articulated in the program review. This eligibility criteria for the 1999 Recreation
Grants Program Guidelines are attached as Appendix A.
Eligibility criteria are straightforward. Where a new applicant can be deemed ineligible based on
their submission, the agency has been notified of their ineligibility for funding and that their
application will not go forward to the interview and allocation processes.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
A total of 39 new applicants applied to the 1999 Minor Recreation Grants Programs. Based on
eligibility criteria contained in Appendix A, staff have determined that 37 of the 39 new applicants
are eligible for consideration at this stage of the review. However, these 37 organizations could be
deemed ineligible based on additional information at the interview and allocation stages.
Synchro Canada's Centre of Excellence is the elite team of high performance for Canada's top
ranked synchro athletes. They obtain year-round leading edge centralized training at the Etobicoke
Olympium Pool and receive $743,050.00 in Federal support. Minor Recreation Grants are available
to Toronto based organizations that are managed by local boards and provide direct services to
Toronto residents. Synchro Canada's Board of Directors is comprised of seven members from across
Canada, one of whom lives in Toronto. Minor Recreation Grants support grass root and
developmental clubs and organizations that have locally established Boards and memberships.
Synchro Canada's application is ineligible for Minor Recreation funding.
The City of Toronto provides Major and Minor Recreation Grants Programs. Policy for the Major
and Minor Recreation Grants Programs established two separate programs and criteria that made
each organization eligible in only one category. This allows both large and smaller groups to be
funded. The policy establishing the Major Recreation Category is attached as Appendix B. It should
be noted that the minimum level of funding for Major Recreation Grants was increased from
$10,000.00 to $12,000.00 some years ago. The 519 Church Street Community Centre is eligible for
and receives an annual Major Recreation Grant of $23,047.00; therefore, their application for Minor
Recreation funding is ineligible.
There are two other Minor Recreation Grant applications from Major Recreation Grant recipients;
however, St. Alban's Boys' and Girls' Club is applying as trustee for the Jane/Finch Boys' and Girls'
Club, and Scadding Court is applying as trustee for the Lion Park of the Toronto Lion Dance
Festival.
Staff are seeking direction on a late grant application received from Alexandra Park Community
Centre. For 1998, Alexandra Park Community Centre received $11,000.00 from the Minor
Recreation Grants Program and $14,447.00 from the Community Resources Fund (CRF). The CRF
conditions stated that "future funding is conditional on demonstrated improvements in the agency's
administrative and financial management of systems". Alexandra Park Community Centre was
mailed a Minor Recreation Grant application in January and requested additional applications on
two occasions in 1999. Deadline for filing an application was 4 p.m. on March 15, 1999. On
April 1, 1999, an incomplete Minor Recreation Grant application was received. Their Board
Minutes of January 27, 1999, show approval of the general submission of a grant to the City of
Toronto.
The Minor Recreation funding request is for a summer day camp that operates in a high needs area
for eight weeks in July and August and is directed to youth program materials, outings, special
events, and some administration costs. It would appear that the agency has not improved its
administrative management, nor filled out or presented accurate and complete information in the
grants application in a timely manner. Policy states that late applications will not be accepted or
reviewed. To support one late application over another may set a precedent, as many organizations
have requested applications after the deadline and have been denied. It may be possible to award
some grant funds for the camp, if the Board of Directors of Alexandra Park Community Centre
identifies and secures a not-for-profit incorporated community organization that has submitted a
grant application to the City for 1999 funding and becomes a trustee for the administrative and
financial management of the summer camp.
Conclusions:
This report summarizes the results of the eligibility assessments of new applicants under the Minor
Recreation Grants Program. Pending approval of the 1999 Consolidated Grants Budget, it is
anticipated that there will be limited funding available for all applicants in the Minor Recreation
Grants.
Contact Name:
Cathi Forbes, Acting Recreation Grants Manager ; Tel: 395-6192.
(A copy of each of the Appendices referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members
of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on
May 10, 1999, and the agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and copies thereof
are also on file in the office of the City Clerk).
10
Toronto Heritage Fund Grants Program
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (April 30, 1999) from the Managing
Director, Toronto Historical Board, respecting the Toronto Heritage Fund Grants Program.
--------
(Report dated April 30, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Managing Director, Toronto Historical Board)
Purpose:
This report recommends that the Municipal Grants Review Committee designate $100,000.00 from
the 1998 Consolidated Grants Budget underexpenditures to provide a one-time top up to the Toronto
Heritage Fund Grants Program.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
During 1998, Heritage Toronto identified to the Municipal Grants Review Committee the need for
a one time $100,000.00 top up to the reserve fund. This would provide for increased interest earnings
which in turn would be made available to the anticipated 15 percent increase of designated properties
eligible for grants.
Through the 1998 account closings underexpenditures of approximately $3.186 million were
identified within the Consolidated Grants Program. A liability of $100,000.00 was created within
the 1998 underexpenditures to provide for the Toronto Heritage Fund adjustment, subject to Heritage
Toronto putting forward a report to the Municipal Grants Review Committee formerly requesting
and justifying the increase.
Funds have been allocated from the Consolidated Grants Budget as approved by Council (subject
to Council approval).
Recommendation:
It is recommended that to successfully provide grant funding from the Toronto Heritage Fund,
Council top up the base fund by $100,000.00.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At its meeting of May 4, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee requested that Heritage
Toronto consult with stakeholders about expanding the Toronto Heritage Fund grant program to
cover the entire City of Toronto. Heritage Toronto reported to the November 20, 1998, Municipal
Grants Review Committee. The Committee adopted the following Recommendations Nos. (1) to (5)
of the report:
(1) that the Heritage Toronto Fund grants program be expanded to cover the entire City of
Toronto;
(2) that Heritage Toronto or its successor continue to administer and manage the Toronto
Heritage Fund grant program on behalf of the City of Toronto;
(3) that Heritage Toronto or its successor should report back to Council in one year with a
review of the program and an appropriate long-term strategy for managing the Fund;
(4) that applications be reviewed on a competition basis; and
(5) that a representative of each former municipality be invited to participate in a
cross-jurisdictional review committee.
The Municipal Review Grants Committee deferred consideration of Recommendation No. (6):
"(6) That to successfully operate the expanded program, the Board requests
Council to include an immediate contribution of $100,000.00 to the fund.,"
pending receipt of a detailed report from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services which establishes the priority services areas for the 1999 Municipal Grants Program and
Heritage Toronto formally requesting the funds. City Council adopted these recommendations at its
December 16 and 17, 1998, meeting (Clause No. 9, contained in Report No. 26 of The Strategic
Policies and Priorities Committee, headed " The Toronto heritage Fund Grants Program").
Comments and /or Discussion and /or Justification:
Heritage Toronto has reviewed and recommended grants under the Toronto Heritage Fund grants
program on behalf of the former City of Toronto for over 12 years. The Toronto Heritage Fund grant
program allows the municipality to aid owners of properties designated under the Ontario Heritage
Act with approved restoration and conservation projects.
At its meeting of December 16, 1998, City Council adopted the recommendation to expand the
Toronto Heritage Fund Grant Program to cover the entire City of Toronto. To successfully operate
the expanded program, Heritage Toronto requires additional monies to augment the base fund to
increase the amount of interest available to assist in the expanded services for grants. Based on the
number of additional designated properties as a result of amalgamation that are now eligible for
restoration grants, a 15 percent increase, Heritage Toronto requests that an additional $100,000.00
be allocated to the support the program.
Conclusion:
While the administration and management of the Toronto Heritage Fund grant program, remains
substantially the same, and that the recently approved Heritage Services governance structure has
yet to be implemented, the request for the $100,000.00 to the base fund assists in the amount of
interest available for the expanded program and ensures its continued future.
Contact Name:
Marisa Williams, Preservation Officer, Architecture, Heritage Toronto,
Tel: 392-6827 Extension 240.
11
Graffiti Transformation Program -
1999 Recommended Allocations
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development
Services be requested to submit a report to the Planning and Transportation Committee on
the feasibility of expanding the Graffiti Transformation Program to include some forms of
vandalism.")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports, for the information of Council, having
requested the Chief Administrative Officer to submit a report directly to Council for its meeting
scheduled to be held on June 9, 1999, on how this venture can be monitored to ensure that the
Graffiti Transportation Project is actually being undertaken and the grant is being properly utilized.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following communication
(May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (April 22, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services respecting the Graffiti Transformation
Program - 1999 Recommended Allocations, subject to amending the Appendix A referred to in
Recommendation No. (1) to provide that the grant allocation to "Homo Air Ectus" be increased by
$1,958.00 for a total 1999 allocation of $26,000.00.
Mr. Mark Dias, "Homo Air Ectus", appeared before the Municipal Grants Review Committee to
appeal the recommendation in the report of the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development
Services.
(Report dated April 22, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services)
Purpose:
To recommend grants to 14 organizations for the removal of graffiti and the transformation of
vandalized surfaces into murals. The decision to initiate the Graffiti Transformation Program arose
from presentations to the Neighbourhoods Committee of the former City of Toronto regarding the
deterioration of communities caused in part by the proliferation of graffiti. As a reinvestment in both
the liveability of urban neighbourhoods and the youth in those communities, agencies train and
employ young people to carry out the work.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Funds for this grant program are available in the Consolidated Grants budget. There are no other
financial implications.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) grants be provided to community groups to engage in Graffiti Transformation as shown in
Appendix A; such Grants are deemed to be in the interest of the Municipality;
(2) the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto;
and
(3) early in 2000, the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services report on the
evaluation of the Graffiti Transformation Program in 1999 with particular emphasis on the
first year progress of new groups in former municipalities where the program was not
previously available.
Council Reference/Background/History:
The Council of the former City of Toronto established a program for the removal of graffiti and the
transformation of the defaced sites into murals in 1996. The decision to initiate the Graffiti
Transformation Program arose from presentations to the Neighbourhoods Committee of the former
City of Toronto regarding the deterioration of communities caused in part by the proliferation of
graffiti. Staff of the Planning Division were asked to investigate and comment on a presentation on
the subject by the Christie Ossington Neighbourhood Centre. Subsequently, the Graffiti
Transformation Program was established as a grant to community groups.
Participating agencies create training and business experience for youth in the field of graffiti
removal and outdoor art. In this way an opportunity was created to ameliorate neighbourhood
deterioration and, since much of the graffiti is perpetrated by youth, to involve their peers in learning
about the adverse effects of the vandalism in retail and residential neighbourhoods as a proactive
intervention. In the process, valuable skills are learned in remediation methods, business practice
and community relations.
A Community Economic Development (C.E.D.) model was the chosen approach. This approach,
described in detail in Appendix C, involves the hiring of youth by local organizations who would
provide training and development for them while carrying out the service. This will be the fourth
year of operation within the boundaries of the former City of Toronto and the first year in other
former Municipalities of the new City.
Comments:
A community suffers when areas previously enjoyed by everyone become the "property" of a group,
making others uncomfortable about using the space. People will stay away when the "tagging" of
an area, (graffiti labels and initials applied on public or private property) becomes more common
than proper use of the public space. This discomfort, by keeping people away, adds to the sense of
danger and can make an area even more unsafe, since there is none of the informal surveillance
provided by those relaxing on park benches or moving through the laneway after parking their car.
This in turn encourages more graffiti, creating a vicious circle.
In 1996, the former City of Toronto Council established a program for the removal of graffiti and
the transformation of the defaced sites into murals. The program was designed to enhance the
affected neighbourhoods. The work could have been carried out in a variety of ways such as
contracts with private muralists, by way of public competitions or by adult art clubs.
At the time, the Department also had a mandate to work on youth unemployment as well as
neighbourhood planning, improvement and revitalization issues. A Community Economic
Development (C.E.D.) model involving the hiring of youth by local organizations who would
provide training and development for them while carrying out the service was designed and
proposals were sought from community groups.
A description of C.E.D models is included in Appendix C.
An interdepartmental team including staff from Urban Planning and Development Services, Parks
and Recreation, and Works and Emergency Services, as well as the Toronto Arts Council are
responsible for reviewing proposals and recommending allocations.
In 1996, five groups were awarded a total of $179,589.00. Those groups produced 18 murals and
cleaned several hundred smaller graffiti sites. The groups also leveraged a further $124,959.00 from
a combination of sales and other funders as well as $10,683.00 in the form of free time, talent,
materials and small donations. This total of $315,231.00 in combined resources resulted in 80 youth
directly received $159,861.00.
Following the success of the 1996 Graffiti Transformation Program, the former City repeated the
program in 1997 allocating $286,000.00 to 12 groups. The program resulted in 68 murals and the
cleaning of over four hundred units of graffiti where murals were not appropriate or desired. Other
donations of time, materials and cash, as well as sales of the service by the youth, increased the value
of the 1997 program to $394,956.61, an increase of 38 percent over the City grants envelope.
One hundred and eighteen (118) youth were employed in the program and paid $205,494.88 in
wages and stipends.
In 1998, in accordance with granting policy, the program budget and availability remained
unchanged from pre-amalgamation guidelines. The twelve groups again participated, producing a
further 51 murals, cleaning 30 sites and 625 tags from small street installations. In addition, one
group now offers backlane addresses for emergency identification and several are receiving
commissions for private works of art. In the process they created 117 jobs and 24 casual work
opportunities for youth. Well over $72,000.00 was raised by these groups from donations, sales and
other funders.
Over the three-year life of the program, over 1,000 "tags" have been removed, 30 sites have been
cleaned and 137 murals have been created. Along the way, nearly 350 youth have received paying
work as well as training in the technical aspects of graffiti removal, outdoor art and business skills.
In addition to the interest demonstrated by donations and sales, the youth experienced many
indications of approval from their respective communities - kind words, assistance, applause - as
well as being drawn into the fabric of the community in a way many may not have previously
experienced.
The 1999 Program:
This year, requests totalled $372,223.00 as compared to a budget of $284,300.00. Reductions have
been discussed with the review committee which attempted to consider factors such as the
proponent's experience and ability to raise other amounts, age of and disadvantages faced by the
youth resulting in higher supervision requirements and requests too small to withstand cuts without
resulting in an unrealistic proposal. The recommended allocations are shown in Appendix A, while
project descriptions are shown in Appendix B.
Council policy respecting grants for 1999 required all programs to be made available City-wide for
the first time, allowing the program to include proposals from new groups. In anticipation of limited
funds to expand availability to a much larger City, staff provided all Councillors with materials on
the program and requested their assistance in identifying groups in their constituencies with an
interest in the issue and a capacity to deliver the program. An introductory information session was
held in the fall and follow-up conversations continued throughout the winter and spring with
attendees and others who expressed interest. A final session was held in spring for those who were
still interested and, as a result, 14 proposals were received as described in Appendix B.
Three of those proposals are from communities in former municipalities where the program was
previously unavailable and discussions are underway with a group in a fourth for inclusion in next
year's program. The budget process has resulted in an additional $34,300.00 being made available
for this purpose and the new groups are to be congratulated for their co-operation in recognizing the
limited resources available.
Evaluation of this year's program will be reported prior to recommendations for 2000. It is expected
that for purposes of geographic distribution, the City will be viewed from the framework of this
Department's Planning Districts that year.
Conclusions:
In order to continue the Graffiti Transformation Program in 1999, grants should be awarded as
described in Appendix A. Staff will report prior to the next budget cycle with respect to further
expanding the program availability as well as this year's results. This report will be made to the
Planning and Transportation Committee.
Contact Name:
Larry King, Planner, Tel: 392-0622.
--------
Appendix A: 1999 Recommended Allocations
Graffiti Transformation Project
Applicant 1998 Allocation 1999 Request 1999 Recommended
Cecil Community Centre $22,000.00 $29,033.00 $22,000.00
Christie Ossington $25,000.00 $41,320.00 $23,043.00
Neighbourhood Centre
Community Business $15,000.00 $18,000.00 $15,000.00
Resource Centre
Community Centre 55 $21,000.00 $31,000.00 $21,000.00
Davenport Perth
Neighbourhood Centre $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
Dixon Hall $23,000.00 $21,978.00 $21,000.00
Neighbourhood Centre
Pape Adolescent $25,000.00 $34,626.00 $23,043.00
Resource Centre
Native Child & Family $34,000.00 $34,500.00 $28,043.00
Services of Toronto
"Homo Air Ectus" $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $24,042.00
St. Christopher House $10,000.00 $16,433.00 $10,000.00
Scadding Court Community $ 6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
Centre
LAMP N/A $25,756.00 $23,043.00
Arts York N/A $30,000.00 $23,043.00
West Scarborough N/A $35,577.00 $23,043.00
Community Centre
Totals $250,000.00 $372,223.00 $284,300.00
Appendix B: Description of Applicants Proposals
Graffiti Transformation Project
Agency |
Grant Amount
(1) 1998
(2) Request
(3) 1999 |
Notes |
Cecil Community Centre
and Harbourfront Community Centre.
(joint project ) |
(1) $22,000.00
(2) $29,033.00
(3) $22,000.00
|
One co-ordinator ( an older youth) + 10 youth.
Will link youth to their Employment Resource
Centre Trainees are "high need at risk" youth.
$3,300.00 inkind donated 2-5 murals. |
Christie Ossington Neighbourhood
Centre
"United Neighbourhood Artists"
|
(1) $25,000.00
(2) $41,320.00
(3) $23,043.00 |
Using two experienced youth from previous years
to train six new youth. This year will include more
emphasis on skills and business training. |
Community Business Resource Centre
and the Parkdale Village Business
Improvement Area with various
Parkdale groups.
|
(1) $15,000.00
(2) $18,000.00
(3) $15,000.00 |
Up to 12 youth jobs. Technical training in removal
and murals, career development seminars.
Partnership with local business association,
school, recreation centre and others. Eight major
sites, two murals and maintenance of previous
work. Target is $18,000.00 in corporate and
community contributions. |
Community Centre 55
|
(1) $21,600.00
(2) $31,000.00
(3) $21,000.00
|
Eight youth. Primarily removal and touch up with
cart. One-two graffiti artists to paint 2 murals.
$4,000.00 expected from sales and donations. |
Davenport Perth Neighbourhood Centre
"Mural Express!"
|
(1) $22,000.00
(2) $22,000.00
(3) $22,000.00 |
Eight youth aged 16-20. Some are returning from
last year and plan is to move to a more business
operation. Six sites, split between public, private
and community non profit. Anticipating $4,000.00
in sales/donations and $3,000.00 in funds from
other sources. |
Dixon Hall Neighbourhood Centre
"Fresh Coat - Regent Park Youth
Painters"
|
(1) $23,000.00
(2) $21,978.00
(3) $21,000.00 |
Four-six youth, 18-24. Three experienced from
last year to peer train. Business training also
provided. Attempt at partial cost recovery and
move to a business format. Nine-twelve sites to be
looked at. |
Area 4,1999" Pape Adolescent
Resource Centre (PARC) with
Eastview Neighbourhood Community
Centre
|
(1) $25,000.00
(2) $34,626.00
(3) $23,043.00 |
Two older youth co-ordinators.
16 youth "in care" age 15-19 (5-8 murals).
Some sites have been offered already by owners.
Plan to increase entrepreneurial revenues and seek
funding to continue in fall. |
7th Generation Image Makers
Native Child & Family Services of
Toronto
|
(1) $34,000.00
(2) $34,500.00
(3) $28,043.00 |
Native street youth - "uniquely Canadian Images"
re: Tourist interest.
Successful business spin-offs (commissioned art,
business cards etc.) last year. Sites identified.
Hope to work with Yonge Street Revitalization
Project, increase self-employment training. 16
youth to benefit. |
"Homo Air Ectus"
|
(1) $26,000.00
(2) $26,000.00
(3) $24,042.00 |
As with Murality, this organization has created a
successful venture over two years. They will
employ youth from that period as two team leaders
(part time) working with 16 part time student
artists.Already large list of sites and commitments. |
St. Christopher House
|
(1) $10,000.00
(2) $16,433.00
(3) $10,000.00 |
Partners with Midtown Kiwanis Boys and Girls
Club. Ten youth age 13-15. Woman abuse as a
result of negative images part of educational
component. One youth age 20-25 as team leader.
Agencies donating $8,848.00 in administration. |
Lakeshore Area Multi Service Project |
(1) n/a
(2) $25,756.00
(3) $23,043.00 |
First year proposal in South Etobicoke. Growth of
graffiti and mural workshops with local artists and
youth last fall generated interest in the
program.Partnerships with local business etc. Plan
to execute four murals this year with six youth. |
West Scarborough Community Centre |
(1) n/a
(2) $35,577.00
(3) $23,043.00 |
First year collaboration with seven community
partners. Four youth, expect $5,200.00 in other
contributions. Broad training in life skills and
conflict resolution as well as technical skills. No
projections yet on volume of work. |
Arts York |
(1) n/a
(2) $30,000.00
(3) $23,043.00 |
A first year collaboration with Arts York as
sponsor. Four youth groups covering most of
former York will clean and provide two murals
each. Total budget is $54,420.00 with expected
Federal and community contributions making up
the rest. If insufficient other funds, will scale back
to focus on one area initially. Twenty youth to be
involved. |
Scadding Court Community Centre,
"Urban Artists"
|
(1) $6,000.00
(2) $6,000.00
(3) $6,000.00 |
Target Alexandra Park and Chinatown
Second year focus large murals, technical and
business training will progress to using the
summer experience to find part time contracts over
the winter for eight youth and more focus on
privately owned properties.
|
Total 1998
Total Requests
Total Recommended
|
$ 250,000.00
$ 372,223.00
$ 284,300.00
|
Projected numbers of youth hired and murals
created are based on requested amounts. The
lower recommended budgets will impact on
these projections and on any anticipated
revenue. |
--------
Appendix C
Community Economic Development
The establishment of local organizations to solve local problems has a long history in Toronto. More
recently, strategies to include economic components in community-based endeavours have received
support from the Federal, Provincial and Municipal Governments. The City of Toronto first became
involved in such efforts in 1980 with a grant program providing funds for feasibility studies and
start-up costs. Eventually, the City supported the development of the Community Business Resource
Centre to provide development and training and the Greater Toronto Community Loan Fund to
provide capital. This Department currently works closely with these organizations on a variety of
programs to encourage and support self-employment, community businesses and retail strip
revitalization programs.
In Community Economic Development terms, there are two basic models that are used depending
on the issue being addressed, the financial scenario and the outcomes that are sought.
Community-based training models generally address issues of preparation for the work force and use
business opportunities as a vehicle for this effort. The employees generally work in the business
until the required training occurs or their term (as determined by program guidelines) is complete.
Assistance in a job search is then offered. Skills for Change and Trinity Square Enterprises are
examples of this model.
Community Businesses operate on a model that emphasizes the provision of jobs in a more
traditional sense. Although training occurs, the focus is on enabling the employee or member to
perform well enough to stay with the business as opposed to finding employment elsewhere. Where
particular employment issues are evident (for example, medical concerns, single parenthood, the
need to continue formal education). Accommodations are built into the operational model to
mitigate the impact of the employment barrier while allowing the person to still earn money from
productive employment. AWAY Express (a ten-year old courier business using public transit) and
Prezents of Mind (a craft store) are examples of Community Businesses.
Both types of organizations are incorporated as non-profits (corporations without share capital)
enabling them to partner with both public and private organizations as well as voluntary and private
sector foundations. There is frequently overlap in the models and few are purely training or business
oriented. Similarly, the best and most durable have a diverse financial base usually including formal
and informal arrangements with the public, private and voluntary sectors in addition to revenue from
sales.
A key component in most successful models is the ongoing involvement of public sector funders.
Traditionally, Federal and Provincial agencies have played significant roles in this regard due to their
employment and economic development mandates. However there is an argument to be made for
Municipal involvement both from the perspective of defining issues and approaches locally and
based on the view that cities suffer the most direct and evident results of unemployment, and in this
instance, the social, economic and visual impact of graffiti.
It appears, after reviewing the experience of the Christie Ossington Community Centre with their
staff, that a community-based training model is appropriate at this point. The possibility of
conversion to some form of community business in the future may be worth evaluating after an
initial pilot.
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing
Clause, the following report (June 8, 1999) from the Chief Administrative Officer:
Purpose:
To describe the ways in which the Graffiti Transformation Grant Program measures and evaluates
results and outcomes.
Funding Sources/Financial Implications/Impact Statement:
N/A
Recommendations:
That this report be received for information.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At its meeting of June 1, 1999, the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee requested the Chief
Administrative Officer to submit a report directly to Council for its meeting scheduled to be held on
June 9, 1999, on how this venture can be monitored to ensure that the Graffiti Transformation
Project is actually being undertaken and the grant is being properly utilized.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
In 1996, the former City of Toronto Council established a program for the removal of graffiti and
the transformation of the defaced sites into murals. The program was designed to remove the graffiti
while enhancing the affected neighbourhoods. At the time, the Department also had a mandate to
work on youth unemployment as well as neighbourhood planning, improvement and revitalization
issues. A Community Economic Development (C.E.D.) model involving the hiring of youth by local
organizations who would provide training and development for them while carrying out the service
was designed and proposals were sought from community groups.
Council established the following evaluative criteria: community enhancement outcomes, financial
and employment outcomes, business outcomes and training outcomes. In the second year, the
potential markets for the artwork were also considered as a means of increasing sales revenues that
could be re-invested in the program at the delivery agency level.
In order to keep the program outcome oriented and manageable, it is administered in a somewhat
different manner than other programs. Expressions of interest are followed up by meeting with the
prospective agency to ensure that they fully understand the City's expectations for the program and
have the capacity and experience to work with youth around content (cleaning of sites, the art
component ) and process ( training, community relations, sales and marketing etc. ) as well as
administration. Groups will often screen themselves out at this stage.
Having established a " roster " of groups that have demonstrated this capacity, they are then invited
to submit proposals detailing a workplan and numbers of youth to be employed. These are reviewed
by a committee including staff from Urban Planning and Development Services, Works and
Emergency Services ( By-law Enforcement ), Economic Development ( Parks and Recreation) and
the Toronto Arts Council. In each of the four years of operation, all proposals have been funded as
a result of this information and pre-screening process. This year, one group that had received
funding in the first three years chose not to participate because it feels it has achieved its goals for
the neighbourhood.
When Council approves allocations, a meeting is held with all participating groups to ensure that
objectives are clearly understood and to establish a network for communication and mutual
assistance. A similar " debriefing " is held at the end of the summer. Throughout the summer City
staff maintain communications with the groups and carry out site visits as well as attend periodic
mural unveilings as a means of staying in touch with the work.
This has resulted in a very strong commitment to teamwork, partnership and sharing of experience
over the years. For example, staff of Community Centre 55 and Homo Air Ectus among others, have
played key roles in assisting new groups while an early youth participant has been hired to
co-ordinate the program of a first year group in former Scarborough.
Finally, each group is required to provide a report annually addressing the specific objectives of
the program. This information is then used by Urban Planning and Development Services to prepare
an evaluation for Council. An example of the summary information used in evaluating the program
format is included as Appendix A. The report before you today summarizes the cumulative program
results over three years.
In past years this evaluation was presented to Council in the late fall and prior to the allocations
report for the following year. As a result of administrative procedures during the first year of
amalgamation, evaluative information from 1998 is included in the allocations report for 1999
which is before you today. Council can expect Urban Planning and Development Services to return
to this reporting format later this year.
Conclusions:
The Graffiti Transformation Program is monitored and evaluated annually against the outcomes
it is designed to achieve. Groups wishing to participate are first screened for their capacity to
effectively implement the program. They are then required to submit proposed workplans and attend
a preliminary planning and networking session. Throughout the summer, City staff monitor progress
through site visits, phone calls and attendance at unveilings. This is followed by a debriefing session
and a report to staff in the fall. All of these elements are combined in a program summary chart
annually. ( See Appendix A ) These charts are then used in an evaluation report to Council that
summarizes both the results for the current year and cumulative results over the life of the program.
It is my view that the current evaluation methods are sufficient to ensure that the program is
undertaken and that the grants are properly used.
Contact Name:
Larry King - 392-0622)
Insert Table/Map No. 1
Appendix A - Summary of 1997 Graffiti Transformation Program
Insert Table/Map No. 2
Appendix A Summary of 1997 Graffiti Transformation Program
12
Community Services Grants Program -
Eligibility Assessment of New Applicants
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner
of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the Community Services Grants
Program - Eligibility Assessment of New Applicants, with the exception of the recommendations
pertaining to the following applicants, referred to in Appendix "A".
- Association for Caribbean Advancement;
- Bloor Jewish Community Centre;
- Cypriot Community of Toronto;
- Down Syndrome Association of Scarborough; and
- North York Safety Village.
The Municipal Grants Review Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and
Priorities Committee, having:
(1) requested the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to consult with the
Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Housing Company Inc. on the feasibility of providing
alternative support to the 679 Tenant Association (Item No. 1 in Appendix "A") and report
thereon to the Community Services Committee;
(2) referred back to the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services the grant
request from the Bloor Jewish Community Centre (Item No. 6 in Appendix "A") for further
review and report thereon to the Community Services Committee;
(3) directed that the appropriate Community Development Officers be requested to assist the
following applicants listed in Appendix "A" in looking for other potential funders and to
provide advice on the type of organizational development that the applicant could undertake
to assist them in becoming eligible for funding under the Community Services Grants
Program, or other funding programs for which they may be eligible:
- Association for Caribbean Advancement (Item No. 2);
- Cypriot Community of Toronto (Item No. 15); and
- Down Syndrome Association of Scarborough (Item No. 17); and in the case of the
Association to review its service goals and linkages to other service providers;
(4) requested the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to report on the
feasibility of providing funding to the three proposed Children's Safety Villages in the City
of Toronto (North York Safety Village Item No. 33) through either the Community Services
Grants Program, or from other sources; and further that the appropriate staff meet with the
three Children's Safety Village organizations to provide advice regarding the application
process and other potential funding sources;
(5) directed that the appropriate Community Development Officers be requested to assist the
following applicants in looking for other potential funders, and to provide advice on the type
of organizational development the applicant could undertake:
- Refugees and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto Inc. (Item No. 38); and
- Somali Canadian Community Advancement Centre (Item No. 44);
(6) requested the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services and the Medical
Officer of Health to submit a joint report to both the Community Services Committee and
the Board of Health on the history of all food and gardening related grants programs, such
report to include the number of community gardens supported, the previous level of support
provided, and the level the City could continue to support; and
(7) received the communication from The Barbados St. Michael Alumni (Toronto).
Background:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, had before it the following report and
communication:
- (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services
providing a summary of the eligibility assessment of the 55 new applicants under the 1999
Community Services Grants Program; and outlining recommendations in regard thereto; and
- (May 10, 1999) from Ms. Cyriline Taylor, The Barbados St. Michael Alumni (Toronto),
appealing the recommendations contained in the report of the Commissioner of Community
and Neighbourhood Services.
The following persons appeared before the Municipal Grants Review Committee to appeal the
recommendation contained in the aforementioned report of the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services:
- Ms. Sandy Nimmo, 679 Tenants Association;
- Ms. Harriet Wichin, Bloor Jewish Community Centre;
- Mr. Abdirahaman Muse, Somali Canadian Community Advancement Centre; and submitted
a brief in regard thereto;
- Mr. Stanley Joseph, Refugee and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto Inc.;
- Mr. Eric Onisiforou, President, Cypriot Community of Toronto;
- Ms. Chellam Siva, Blue Ribbon Child Care Society;
- Mr. Ted Torrance, Vice-President, North York Safety Village;
- Mr. Calvin Vickers, Ms. Charmaine Lym and Mr. Gerry Leonard, Association for Caribbean
Advancement; and
- Ms. Margaret D'Souza, Down Syndrome Association of Scarborough; and submitted a brief
in regard thereto.
--------
(Report dated May 4, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Purpose:
This report presents a summary of the eligibility assessment of the 55 new applicants under the 1999
Community Services Grant Program (C.S.G.P.).
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Not applicable.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the 27 new applicants determined to be eligible at this stage of the assessment process
proceed to the next level of assessment;
(2) the 22 new applicants determined to be ineligible at this stage of the assessment be advised
that they are not eligible for support under the 1999 Community Services Grants Program;
(3) the six remaining new applicants be referred for consideration under other City grants
programs; and
(4) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Council Reference/Background/History:
In September 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, titled "Community
Service Grants Program Review," that detailed the program guidelines for an amalgamated
community service/general grants program. Eligibility criteria for the 1999 grants cycle were revised
and clarified, consistent with the directions articulated in the program review.
The program criteria address agency mandate and location, structure and governance, financial
management and accountability, operations and staffing, program efficiency, and the agency's
relationship with its community. In order to make the program more accessible to smaller
organizations, the eligibility criteria for applicants requesting $10,000.00 or below are less stringent
than for requests of over $10,000.00. The eligibility criteria for the Community Services Grants
Program are contained in Appendix "B".
A number of the eligibility criteria are straightforward and can be clearly determined from an
agency's written submission. Where a new applicant has been deemed ineligible based on their
written submission, the agency has been informed of the determination and the reasons for it.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
A total of 55 new applicants submitted written applications under the 1999 Community Services
Grants Program. Based on the eligibility criteria contained in Appendix "B", staff have determined
that 27 new applicants are eligible for further consideration at this stage of the review process. The
final determination of eligibility for those 27 applicants will be made based on the written
submission and an assessment interview with Grants Staff. A further 22 new applicants have been
determined to be ineligible for funding because the program, agency, or both, do not meet the
C.S.G.P. criteria. The remaining six new applicants are not eligible under the C.S.G.P., but may be
eligible under other City of Toronto grants programs. These applications have been forwarded to
the appropriate City staff for review.
Agencies that are ineligible because the program activity does not fit within the mandate of the
C.S.G.P., e.g. employment counselling, may request staff assistance in pursuing other sources of
support. Similarly, where an organization has been determined ineligible because they have not yet
developed the required organizational systems and structures, agency development support may be
requested.
Appendix "A" provides a list of new applicants, their eligibility determination, and, if ineligible, the
reasons for the determination. Those agencies determined to be ineligible have been notified by staff
prior to the May 10, 1999, Municipal Grants Review Committee meeting in order to allow them the
opportunity to depute directly to the Committee should they disagree with the staff recommendation.
Conclusions:
This report summarizes the results of the first stage of eligibility determination for new applicants
under the 1999 Community Services Grants Program. It is recommended that 27 of the 55 new
applicants proceed to the interview stage of assessment.
The funds available for new applicants in 1999 will be limited. Although 27 new applicants will be
interviewed, funds may not be available to support all new applicants.
Contact Name:
Chris Brillinger, Tel: 392-8608.
--------
Appendix "A"
New Applicants not Eligible for Community Services Grants Funding:
(1) 679 Tenant Association:
The agency has requested funding of $10,000.00 for the development, implementation and
maintenance of community gardens and increasing recreational space in the Harbourfront
area of Toronto.
The program is not eligible for funding. While the project will involve residents of the
complex and mobilize community resources, the focus of the initiative is to build community
gardens for food relief, improve the neighbourhood and increase recreational space.
(2) Association for Caribbean Advancement:
The agency has requested $50,000.00 to assist in the provision of counseling services to
youth of Caribbean descent in East Toronto. The agency currently provides a Friday-night
basketball program, annual basketball tournament, and career fair for youth.
The agency is not eligible for funding. The agency is not incorporated, and will not consider
a transfer to Type II funding (grants of $10,000.00 or less). The agency lacks experience in
providing the service for which funds are requested and was unable to provide a budget for
the program.
(3) Baluchi Canadian Association:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(4) Barbados St. Michael's Alumnae (Toronto):
The agency did not submit any of the required application forms (only attachments were
submitted). The agency cannot be interviewed and therefore is considered ineligible.
(5) Beach Arts Centre, The:
The agency does not have a community service mandate. The agency received funding from
Recreation in 1998, and has applied to the wrong program. The agency's request has been
referred to Recreation for consideration.
(6) Bloor Jewish Community Centre:
The agency has requested funding of $7,500.00 for the promotion of health and wellness in
its local community, including training workshops for practitioners, presentations on health
and wellness to local schools, workshops for local businesses and non-profit groups, a
Community Health and Wellness Fair and outreach and publicity for its Wednesday evening
health talks.
The program is not eligible for funding. Health promotion and health-related activities are
not eligible under the Community Services Grants Program.
(7) Blue Ribbon Child Care Society:
The agency has requested funding of $10,000.00, for English and music classes for people
experiencing difficulties in the west end of Toronto.
The agency and its program activities were not considered eligible for funding. The mandate
of the agency is to run a Day Nursery under the Day Nurseries Act. The C.S.G.P. does not
fund daycare centres or day nurseries. As well, the agency has not developed the required
organizational systems and structures. There are no service partners, paid staff or
fundraising. The agency did not provide the required financial, organizational and program
information.
(8) CANACT- Canadian African Newcomer Aid Centre of Toronto:
The agency has requested funding of $35,000.00, for computer training and job search
training for African women in the City of Toronto.
The program is not eligible for funding. The C.S.G.P. does not fund employment programs.
In 1998 the agency was not recommended for a grant because of serious concerns regarding
the agency's performance including an inability to utilize volunteer support, a lack of
collaboration with other community agencies, and weak financial management practices.
These issues continue to be a concern based on the agency's written submission.
(9) Canadian Tamil Women's Community Services (CTW):
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(10) Canadian's for Children at Health Risk:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(11) Canora: Journal des Canadiens et Canadiennes d'Origine Africaine Antillaise et Asiatique:
The agency has requested funding of $10,000.00 for organizing special events to show
French movies to the French-speaking Black community. The organization publishes a
community newspaper, rents French videos and organizes soccer events for the French
speaking Black community in the Greater Toronto Area.
The program is not eligible for funding. The C.S.G.P. does not fund the proposed activities.
(12) Chinese Family Life Service of Metro Toronto:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(13) Chinese Professional Women of Canada:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(14) Council of Agencies Serving South Asians:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(15) Cypriot Community of Toronto:
The agency has requested $20,000.00 to assist in maintenance of the Cypriot Community
Centre, and the provision of cultural activities and support services to members of the
Cypriot community. The agency currently provides cultural activities, workshops and
recreational activities for members of the Cypriot community across the City of Toronto.
The agency is not eligible for funding. . The organization's activities are principally cultural.
The costs for which the agency has requested funding are ineligible under the C.S.G.P.
(16) December 6 Fund:
The agency has requested $10,000.00 for the Revolving Loan Fund Program, which serves
women victims of abuse and their children across the City of Toronto.
The agency and its program activities are not considered eligible for funding. The C.S.P.G.
does not fund the provision of financial assistance to individuals. Aside from staff costs, the
other major budget expenditure is fundraising costs, which are also ineligible. The
organization's membership consists only of its board members and employees.
(17) Down Syndrome Association of Scarborough:
The agency has requested $10,000.00 to assist in the provision of community education
activities to promote a greater understanding of Down Syndrome. The agency currently
provides information about Down Syndrome and conducts monthly support meetings across
the City of Toronto.
The agency is not eligible for funding. The agency requires improvement in the areas of
governance and financial accountability, and did not provide a 1999 budget. The proposed
service duplicates those provided by the Down Syndrome of Toronto. The program lacks
appropriate collaboration, and does not appear to be financially viable.
(18) Evergreen:
Support for drop in and street outreach services to the homeless is currently provided under
the Emergency Support Fund (ESF). As a result, the agency's request will be considered as
a part of the upcoming ESF review process.
(19) Family Day Care Services:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(20) Furniture Bank:
The agency has requested $10,000.00 to assist in the provision of furniture and housewares
to low income, under-housed people. The agency currently collects donations of furniture
and housewares and distributes these to clients across the City of Toronto.
Innovative supports, which facilitate the transition from homelessness to permanent housing,
are currently funded under the Homeless Initiatives Fund. As a result, they are not eligible
for funding under the C.S.G.P. The agency's request will be forwarded to HIF for
consideration.
(21) George Hull Centre, The:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(22) Hispanic Development Council:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(23) Historical Connexion:
The agency has requested $25,000.00 to assist in the provision of a cultural education and
anti-racism program for youth of African descent. The agency currently maintains and
disseminates information about the history of African people in Canada with seminars,
workshops, research and education.
The agency is not eligible for funding. The agency does not have a community service
mandate. The program's cultural education and anti-racism focus is ineligible for funding
under the C.S.G.P. Anti-racism initiatives are currently funded under the Access and Equity
program, and the agency has already applied to this program for funding.
(24) Human Rights and Race Relations Centre:
The agency has requested funding of $10,000.00 to develop a resource centre to assist
Punjabi Ahmadi Muslims across the City of Toronto to access the labor market through
workshops, on career planning, job search, resume writing, interview skills and the Internet.
The agency and its programs are not eligible for funding. The mandate of the organization
is to provide public education and awareness of racism; anti-racism advocacy; promotion of
employment equity initiatives, provide counseling to newcomers in regards to education,
housing and employment, and assist them to access political representatives, the labor
market, and understand Canadian politics. The agency's request will be forwarded to the
Access and Equity Grants Program for consideration.
(25) IBADAN (Oluyole) Canadian Supportive Care:
The agency has requested $10,000.00 to assist in the provision of support services for
persons of African descent with developmental disabilities. The agency did not specify the
services currently provided.
The agency is not eligible for funding. The application did not demonstrate the necessary
track record in the areas of governance, operations, or financial accountability. The agency
did not provide a realistic budget, currently operates without staff and with only ten
volunteers. The proposed program is developmental, does not appear to be financially
viable, and does not involve any collaboration.
(26) Iranian Women's Organization of Ontario:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(27) Jewish Immigrant Aid Services of Canada:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(28) Marguerite Bourgeoys Family Service:
The agency has requested $10,000.00 to assist in the provision of a natural family planning
service for women. The agency currently provides this service to women across the City of
Toronto.
The program is not eligible for funding. Family planning and reproductive health services
are currently funded by Public Health under purchase of service agreements. As a result, the
agency's request is not eligible for funding under the C.S.G.P., but will be referred to Public
Health for review.
(29) Marvin Morten Community Resource Centre:
The agency has requested funding for a violence prevention program and parent education
program for parents/care givers whose children are in need of protection because of physical
abuse.
The agency and its program activities are not eligible for funding. The agency has not
developed the required organizational systems and structures in the areas of governance,
operations and financial accountability. The agency has unaudited financial statements and
did not provide the required financial, organizational and program information.
(30) Metro Street Focus:
The agency has requested $50,000.00 to assist in the provision of street outreach services for
the homeless. The agency currently provides street outreach services to homeless and
socially isolated people across the City of Toronto.
Support for drop in and street outreach services to the homeless is currently provided under
the Emergency Support Fund (ESF). The agency's request will be considered as a part of the
upcoming ESF review process.
(31) Multilingual Community Interpreter Services:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(32) Nishkam Nursing and Seniors Home:
The agency has requested $10,000.00 to assist in the development of a 128-bed long-term
care facility for South Asian seniors. The agency recently incorporated, and does not yet
deliver services.
The program is not eligible for funding. The development and provision of long-term care
is the responsibility of the Provincial Government.
(33) North York Safety Village:
The agency has requested funding of $10,000.00 for a safety village, made up of a miniature
road network, which will deal with safety issues in road safety, fire safety, and training (First
Aid, CPR, babysitting) for people in the City of Toronto.
The program is not eligible for funding. The C.S.G.P. does not fund programs whose
principal goal, objective, or purpose is the primary responsibility of a municipal department,
or Board. The organization is already collaborating with Toronto Police Services, Ambulance
Services, Fire Services and Public Health in order to build the facility and develop programs.
The majority of the members of the organization's governing body do not reside in the City
of Toronto.
(34) On the Move Community Integration Association:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(35) Peace by Peace:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(36) Progress Place Rehabilitation Centre (Metropolitan Toronto) Inc.:
The agency has requested funding of $25,000.00 for the "Warm Line", a peer support
telephone line which provides support from 8 pm to midnight, for people who have severe
and persistent mental illness in the City of Toronto.
The agency and program are not eligible for funding. The C.S.G.P. does not replace lost or
reallocated government funding. This program has been core funded by the Provincial
Government at the level of $75,000.00 in 1997 and 1998. In 1999, the agency proposes to
divert $50,000.00 of the Provincial funds to other areas of the organization and to replace
that with $50,000.00 from the C.S.G.P. The organization does not have an accessible voting
membership, with registered members other than the members of the Board of Directors.
(37) Ralph Thornton Centre:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(38) Refugees and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto Inc.:
The agency has requested $36,768.00 to assist in the provision of a violence prevention and
conflict resolution initiative for Tamil youth. The agency currently serves immigrants and
refugees in St. Jamestown, Cabbagetown and Regent Park.
The agency is not eligible for funding. The agency did not provide a realistic budget, and has
no staff. The proposed program is developmental, not financially viable, and lacks
appropriate collaborations with other agencies.
(39) Reseau des femmes du Sud de l'Ontario:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(40) Serve Canada:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(41) Sikh Youth and Family Centre:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(42) Silayan Filipino Community Centre:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(43) Society for the Aid of Ceylon Minority (SACEM):
The agency has requested $17,560.00 to assist in the provision of a social support and
development program for Tamil youth. The agency currently serves members of the Tamil
community across Toronto.
The agency is not eligible for funding. The agency does not appear to be financially viable,
and is currently supported by a staff of 0.3 FTE. The proposed program is developmental,
and is not financially viable. The majority of the proposed activities are ineligible for
funding under the C.S.G.P.
(44) Somali Canadian Community Advancement Centre (SCCAC):
The agency has requested funding of $9,000.00 for building the organizational capacity of
the agency. The organization serves the Somali community in the City of Toronto.
The agency and program are not eligible for funding. C.S.G.P. requests must be for the
delivery of a community service. As well the organization's activities are largely in the area
of sports and employment programs which are ineligible under the C.S.G.P. The organization
has not yet developed other sources of funding. There was no income in 1999 and the agency
anticipates only $3,000.00 in additional funding.
(45) Somali Canadian Women Association:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(46) Somali Family Child Skills Development Services:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(47) Somali Youth Association of Toronto (S.Y.A.T.):
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(48) St. Mark's Seniors Club:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(49) Sudanese Association of Ontario:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(50) Toronto Adventist Community Services:
Support for drop in and street outreach services to the homeless is currently provided under
the Emergency Support Fund (ESF). As a result, the agency's request will be considered as
a part of the upcoming ESF review process.
(51) Toronto Monthly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers):
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(52) Unemployed Professional African Women (Watu) Association:
The agency has requested funding of $50,000.00 for an employment counseling program for
the Black African community in the City of Toronto.
The program is not eligible for funding. The C.S.G.P. does not fund programs whose
principal goal, objective or purpose is the primary responsibility of the Federal or Provincial
Government, e.g., employment programs. The agency should pursue appropriate Federal and
Provincial funding.
(53) Unlimited Rays of Hope:
The agency has requested funding of $10,000.00 for a community support program that
focuses on improving mental health, drug and alcohol prevention and developmental
programs for residents of Pelham Park Gardens MTHA complex.
The organization is not eligible for funding. The organization has no general membership
to which its governing body is accountable. There are six Board members and three voting
members. The organization is not collaborating with the key community service agencies
in the area regarding the development of services for the Pelham Park community that do
not duplicate already existing services for the residents. There is no other income for the
organization other than user fees of $6,000.00, and the program request requires 100 percent
funding from the City.
(54) Vietnamese Community of North York and Vicinity:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(55) Vietnamese Youth Centre of Toronto:
The agency will proceed to the next level of assessment.
(A copy of the Appendix B referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of
Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on
May 10, 1999, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
(Copies of Appendix B and the communication (Undated) from Ms. Cyriline Taylor of the Barbados
St. Michael Alumni (Toronto), referred to in the foregoing report, were forwarded to all Members
of Council with the June 1, 1999, agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and
copies thereof are also on file in the office of the City Clerk).
13
1999 Recommended Grants Contingency Budget
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (April 30, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the 1999 recommended
Grants Contingency budget.
--------
(Report dated April 30, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Purpose:
To clearly establish criteria for the processing and approval of 1999 requests for Grant Contingency
funding.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Grant Contingency funding of $150.0 thousand has been incorporated into the 1999 Recommended
Operating Budget. As requests may originate from various sources, criteria have been established
to assist in determining which organizations qualify for Grants Contingency funding.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the allocation criteria as defined in this report be applied for the 1999 Consolidated Grants
Budget to all ad hoc requests presented for funding; and
(2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Council Reference/Background/History:
As a part of the 1998 consolidation process for the Grants Program, a "grants contingency" line item
for $200.0 thousand was created to deal with in-year ad hoc grant requests, which met the City's
mandate and for needs arising from transition. During 1998, $115.7 thousand was distributed from
this account, of which only $36.6 thousand related to transitional issues.
On May 4, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee approved a report, titled "Ad Hoc
Requests for City Grants", which recommended that all ad hoc requests be referred to staff for
review and comment before being considered by the Committee.
During the 1999 Operating Budget review process, it was recommended that the Grants Contingency
remain in the 1999 Operating Budget, but at a reduced level of $150.0 thousand, to accommodate
any further adjustments related to transitional items.
Further, at the April 13, 1999, Council meeting, it was approved that $83.8 thousand be provided
to the 761 Community Development Corporation from the following grant service areas: Economic
Development, Community Services, Housing through the Homeless Initiative, and Grants
Contingency. This pre-committed amount could constitute up to $43.8 thousand of the available
Grants Contingency.
Effective June 1, 1999 the Municipal Grants Review Committee will be dissolved with the Grant
requests flowing through to the newly established sub-committee of the Policy and Finance
Committee.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
Given the new political structure and with this being the second year of amalgamation, the Corporate
Grants Team felt it worthy to review the criteria for the Contingency Grant funds to ensure their
validity into 1999.
Criteria No. (1) and (5) have been slightly modified to reflect the clarification of the exclusions
under the Grants Contingency (specifically, donations, gifts, capital expenditures, and the purchase
of fundraising tickets), and the revised review process which reflects the development of the
Corporate Grants Team.
(1) City Mandate:
The first consideration of all requests for support is to determine whether or not the activity
or program for which funding is requested falls within the mandate and priorities as set out
by City Council.
If the proposed activity does not fall within the mandate of the City, the activity should not
be considered for support.
If funding requests for purposes clearly fall within the mandate of another existing City
program, the activity should not be funded from Grants Contingency, but rather from the
related program area.
Items requesting donations, gifts, capital expenditure funding or the purchase of fundraising
tickets will not be funded from Grants Contingency, but may be eligible to seek other sources
of funding.
(2) One-Time Requests:
Only requests which are for one-time activities or programs should be considered. An
on-going activity or program may be considered for funding where it is clear that another
source of support will be available for the initiative during the year 2000 Operating Budget.
Any funding provided from the Grants Contingency must be clearly identified as one-time
and the recipient organizations appropriately informed.
(3) Needs Arising from Amalgamation Transition:
Although efforts have been made during 1999 to evaluate and restructure the Grants Program
to meet the current needs of the City, there may be instances where a need arises as a delayed
result of amalgamation or reorganization of the program. Consideration may be given to
organizations previously funded which, through no action of their own, have been
inadvertently impacted as a result of the changes.
(4) Required Submission of Financial Information:
Each potential recipient of Grants Contingency funding will be required to submit financial
information and meet any conditions attached to specific funding recommendations before
funds are released.
(5) Review Process:
The review and monitoring of all Grants Contingency fund requests will be undertaken by
the Corporate Grants Team.
All requests for grants funding, subsequent to approval of the 1999 Operating Budget, shall
be referred to the Corporate Grants Team Chair. These requests may originate from the
Committee Chair, the Committee Clerk, Councillors, or the Mayor's Office.
The Corporate Grants Team will determine if the request meets the basic criteria for
Contingency Funding and, if so, will forward the request to the most appropriate grant
service area for review and comment. Those requests which do not fall within a specific
service area will be reviewed by the Corporate Grants Team.
Funding requests which appear to meet the established basic criteria, will be provided with
a standard contingency grant application form and a copy of the criteria. Upon review of the
completed application by the appropriate staff, allocation recommendations will be
developed for the consideration of Committee.
Conclusions:
The above criteria and processes are intended to assist Committee members and staff in effectively
utilizing the limited $150.0 thousand available in Grants Contingency for 1999.
Contact Names:
Susan Bury, Tel: 392-8351.
Chris Brillinger, Tel: 392-8608.
14
Distribution of the Reallocated Grants Funding
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (April 30, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the distribution of the
reallocated grants funding.
--------
(Report dated April 30, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Purpose:
To respond to the recommendation in the 1999 Operating Budget analysis for the grant service areas
to finalize the priorities for distributing the reallocated grants funding.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
As of the April 26 and 27, 1999, meeting, Council recommended a reallocation amount of
$898.8 thousand in the 1999 approved budget for the Consolidated Grants Program. Of this amount,
$50.0 thousand was earmarked for Food Access Capital Grants, with an additional $50.0 being
approved by Council. The total Food Access Capital Grant of $100.0 thousand is included in the
Community Services Grants.
Excluding the Food Access Capital Grant, a balance of $848.8 thousand was distributed on a pro-rata
basis across the grant service areas. These funds will allow each service area to begin to address
service levelling issues.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the reallocation amounts within the 1999 approved Consolidated Grants budget be allocated
to specific grants programs as described in this report; and
(2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Council Reference/Background/History:
During the 1999 budget process, $1,378.8 thousand was identified as "excess" within the
Consolidated Grants Program and was available grants funding for 1999, due to the 1998 approved
grants being identified as no longer needed in 1999. The Program requested that the full amount be
utilized for reallocation within the program, however, the final recommendation of Council on
April 26 and 27, 1999, regarding the reallocation amount is that $480.0 thousand should be reduced
from the budget and $898.8 thousand should be reallocated. Further, Council recommended that
$50.0 thousand of the $898.8 thousand, be earmarked for Food Access Capital Grants.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
The $898.8 thousand for distribution, on a pro-rata basis, to each of the grant service areas is broken
down according to the area of service levelling:
Arts and Culture Grants:
Toronto Arts Council Grants 61.1 61.1
Community Services Grants
Breaking the Cycle Grant 166.9
Community Services Grants 97.9
Food Access Capital Grants* 100.0 364.8
* includes $50.0 thousand new grant funds
as approved by Council
Recreation Grants:
Minor Recreation Grants 42.5 42.5
Public Health Grants:
AIDS Prevention Grants 63.1
Drug Abuse Program 126.1 189.2
Housing Grants:
Homeless Initiatives 97.7 97.7
Access and Equity Grants:
Multi-Cultural Grants 146.0 146.0
Economic Development Grants:
Commercial Research 8.0
Special Events 3.1 11.1
Urban Development Grants:
Graffiti Transformation 36.4 36.4
Total $948.8
Less: $50 thousand new for
Food Access Grants ( 50.0)
Total Reallocation Amount as Approved $898.8
Conclusions:
Council approved a reallocation amount of $898.8 thousand within the Consolidated Grants
Program. The distribution of these funds is presented within the text of this report and in the
attached tables.
Contact Name:
Susan Bury, Tel: 392-8351.
(A copy of each of the tables referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of
Council with the agenda for the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on
May 10, 1999, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
15
Allocation Criteria for a Food Related
Capital Grants Program
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk.
Recommendation:
The Municipal Grants Review Committee on May 10, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies
and Priorities Committee the adoption of the attached report (April 29, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the allocation criteria for a
Food Related Capital Grants Program, subject to amending section B. (2) of the Appendix A by
adding thereto the following:
"(i) The geographic location of the activities."
--------
(Report dated April 28, 1999, addressed to the
Municipal Grants Review Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Purpose:
To report on allocation criteria for a capital grants program providing funding on an emergency basis
for volunteers providing food to the homeless.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
An amount of $100,000.00 has been set aside within the approved 1999 Consolidated Grants Budget
for this program.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services approve applications for
funding of $1,000.00 or less, subject to the criteria described in this report, and report such
approvals to the Community Services Committee for information;
(2) applications in excess of $1,000.00 to a maximum of $30,000.00 be subject to the criteria
described in this report and be forwarded to the Community Services Committee and Council
for approval;
(3) the authority to sign Letters of Agreement with successful applicants, as required by the "City
of Toronto Grants Policy", be delegated to the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services or their designates;
(4) all groups requesting funds be required to complete the Capital Grant application contained
in Appendix "A" of this report; and
(5) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At the Board of Health meeting of January 29, 1999, it was recommended that Food Access Capital
Grants be approved at the level of $500,000.00 annually. An evaluation of the Food Access Program
in the former Toronto showed that as part of community food access programming, capital funds for
community facilities and better food delivery systems increased community access to nourishing
diets.
At the Budget Committee meeting of March 29, 1999, the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services was directed to report to the Municipal Grants Review Committee
regarding allocation criteria for a possible capital grants program for food preparation and food
distribution. Subsequently, at the Budget Committee meeting of April 6, 7, and 8, 1999, the
Committee directed that "$100,000.00 be earmarked in the Consolidated Grants budget for the
express purpose of providing capital funding, on a one-time only basis, for the purchase of
refrigerators, ovens, etc., on an emergency basis for volunteers providing food to the homeless, the
said funding to be at the sole discretion of the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services." This recommendation was approved by Council as part of the 1999 Operating Budget.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
The capital grants program will consider requests for kitchen equipment to increase the capacity to
prepare and distribute food and improve food safety, to replace inefficient and unsafe appliances and
to purchase refrigerated vans and trucks to ensure safer distribution of perishable foods for a limited
number of projects.
Organizations eligible for funding would have to meet the general criteria for receiving City grants
as described in the "City of Toronto Grants Policy", plus the following specific criteria, based on
those used in the former Toronto Food Access Grants Program:
Eligibility Criteria:
(1) the capital grant request must support the provision of food to people who are homeless;
(2) the capital grant request must be for improvements that make the delivery of food programs
more effective, resulting in a measurable positive impact on the target population;
(3) the organization must demonstrate community involvement in design, fundraising and
planning of the program of which the capital request is a part;
(4) the organization must be able to demonstrate that for any built-in capital equipment
purchases, e.g., walk-in refrigeration, the building is owned by the applicant or the applicant
has long-term rental security of at least five years;
(5) for requests for delivery vehicles, the organization must be able to demonstrate that sufficient
revenues are available to properly maintain, operate, and insure the vehicle and that all
drivers have the appropriate licence; and
(6) organizations must be incorporated not-for-profit agencies and must provide the City with
a recent Audited Statement.
Given public health estimates of need, and the modest amount of money available, requests for
funding of $1,000.00 or less will be disbursed on a first come, first served basis to those applicants
meeting both the general and specific grants criteria. The application form contained in
Appendix "A" will be made available once Council has authorized the recommendations contained
in this report. The order of applicants will be determined by the date and time of receipt of
completed applications. Once Council approved, a notice announcing the Food Related Capital
Grants Program will be sent to all organizations on the grants and Public Health mailing lists.
Requests will be reviewed by staff to determine eligibility based on the program criteria and
approved by the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services. A staff review group
composed of representatives from Public Health, Purchasing, and Social Development will be
established to review all applications. Applicants that do not meet the criteria will not be
recommended for funding.
Requests for funding in excess of $1,000.00 will be reviewed by staff and recommendations made
to the Community Services Committee. In light of the funding available, it is recommended that the
maximum allocation under the program be set at $30,000.00. This would appear to be an adequate
funding level given the Council direction that the funding be for the purpose of purchasing
refrigerators, ovens, etc. Organizations requesting funding in excess of $1,000.00 may be required
to submit three estimates for the capital purchase. A minimum of $50,000.00 will be reserved for
requests of $1,000.00 or less.
The Council authority for this program includes a reference to the provision of capital funding on
an emergency basis for "volunteers" providing food to the homeless. For the purposes of this
program, organizations that utilize volunteers in the management, administration, fundraising, and/or
delivery of food programs for the homeless will be considered eligible for funding.
Conclusions:
Specific criteria for a capital grants program for food preparation and food distribution are provided.
Requests for $1,000.00 and below that meet the City of Toronto Grants Policy criteria and the
criteria contained in this report will be approved by the Commissioner of Community and
Neighbourhood Services. Requests greater than $1,000.00 up to $30,000.00 will be reviewed by
staff with recommendations forwarded to the Community Services Committee and Council for
consideration.
Contact Name:
Chris Brillinger, Tel: 392-8608.
--------
Appendix A
Food Related Capital Grant Application
Please ensure that the information provided includes the following:
(A) Information on Your Organization:
(1) Legal Name of Organization Requesting Support
Address:
Contact Person:
Phone Number: Fax:
Alternate Contact:
Phone Number: Fax:
(2) Attach the following:
(a) List of Current Board of Directors.
(b) Organizational Chart.
(c) Type of Incorporation; a copy of your Articles of Incorporation; if Charitable,
your Charitable Number.
(d) One-page History of the Organization.
(e) Your Organization's most recent Audited Financial Statements.
(f) Your Organization's Current Year Budget.
(B) Information on the Activity for which a Grant is Requested:
(1) Clearly state the amount of assistance requested.
(2) Briefly outline the proposal. Make sure you include the following:
(a) A detailed description of the equipment to be purchased.
(b) How the equipment will assist in the provision of your programs.
(c) The people who will benefit from the programs.
(d) How the programs are managed, including staffing, reporting requirements,
financial accountability.
(e) How people will be involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation
of the activity.
(f) Estimated starting and completion dates.
(g) How the activity will be evaluated.
(h) How other groups/organizations will benefit from the Capital Purchase.
(3) Provide a complete activity budget, including use and source of other income.
(4) Provide a list of all funding sources approached, level of assistance requested, and
confirmed commitments.
(C) Requirements for City Support:
(1) As a condition of City support, your organization must:
(a) provide an indication that you have adopted and uphold equal opportunity
and non-discrimination policies and sign and return the City's Declaration of
a Non-Discrimination Policy;
(b) submit a declaration signed by at least two officers of your organization
certifying that to the best of their knowledge, the information submitted as
part of the request for a grant from the City of Toronto is accurate and
complete and that the request for support is endorsed by the Board of
Directors of the organization; and
(c) sign a Letter of Agreement demonstrating how City funds are to be used and
agreeing to any specific conditions City Council may have attached to the
recommended support.
(D) Application Submission:
(1) Please submit a complete copy of the application to:
Food Related Capital Grants Program
Social Development and Administration Division
Community and Neighbourhood Services
Station 1114, 11th Floor, Metro Hall
55 John Street
Toronto, ON M5V 3C6
Attention: Diahann Walcott
16
Prepayment Interest and Discount on
Advance Payment of Realty Taxes
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the report
(March 29, 1999) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer wherein it is recommended
that no discount or prepayment interest be offered on taxes paid in advance of the due dates.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following communication
(May 10, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force advises that on May 3, 1999, it adopted the report
(March 29, 1999) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer recommending that no discount
or prepayment interest be offered on taxes paid in advance of the due dates.
For the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, the Task Force thanked staff
of the Finance Department and also requested the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to report on
the potential for administrative savings if the City collected permit parking and other fees in a like
manner as property taxes and to report on whether any savings should be passed on to the affected
ratepayer.
Background:
The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force, on May 3, 1999, had before it a report (March 29, 1999)
from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer respecting Prepayment Interest and Discount on
Advance Payment of Realty Taxes and recommending that no discount or prepayment interest be
offered on taxes paid in advance of the due dates.
The following motion by Councillor Flint was voted on and lost:
"That the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force approve, in principle, a discount program
on advance payment of realty taxes for implementation in the year 2000".
--------
(Report dated March 29, 1999, addressed to the
Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force from the
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer)
Purpose:
This report provides information regarding the motion of Councillor Flint that taxpayers who elect
to pay their interim and/or final taxes in advance of the due date be eligible to receive a discount.
Under current Provincial legislation, the proposed discount program is not permitted.
Financial Implications:
Under the proposed discount program, a 2 percent reduction offered for the payment of interim and
final taxes paid in full on the first instalment dates in each of the billing cycles would result in the
City losing $1.87 for every $100.00 in interim taxes and $1.32 for every $100.00 of final taxes paid
in advance. A 5 percent reduction offered for the payment of final taxes in full would result in the
City losing $4.32 for every $100.00 in taxes paid in advance. Based on a 5 percent take up of the
proposed program, the total loss to the City of a 2 percent reduction for full payment of the
interim/final taxes would $2.02 million, while a loss of $2.73 million would be incurred if a
5 percent reduction for full payment of final taxes was offered.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that no discount or prepayment interest be offered on taxes paid in advance of the
due dates.
Background:
Section 399(5) of the Municipal Act authorizes a municipality, by by-law, to allow discounts or pay
interest on payments of taxes received in advance of their due date. The Act also allows
municipalities to pay interest on advance payments received in respect of realty taxes that have not
yet been levied. The maximum rate allowed is 12 percent per annum.
As an alternative, municipalities can provide discounts under the provisions of Section 4 of the
Municipal Interest and Discount Rates Act ("MIDRA"). MIDRA allows municipalities to pay
discount at a rate not exceeding prime plus 1½ percent.
The Municipal Act and MIDRA do not allow for only certain prepayments to be entitled to a
discount. If discounts are to be provided, any amount of taxes paid in advance of their due date
would receive a discount. The cost of the discount is borne by the municipality, with no charge back
to the school boards.
Prior to 1998, the former City of Toronto was the only area municipality which provided prepayment
interest and discount on advance payments of realty taxes. Discount rates were set annually at the
same level as interest rates allowed on daily interest bank deposit accounts. Discount was paid on
realty taxes paid before the instalment date.
At its meeting on November 20, 1998, the Task Force had before it a motion from Councillor Flint
recommending that taxpayers who pay their taxes in full on the 4th instalment receive a discount of
5 percent, and that taxpayers who pay their interim taxes in full on the first instalment and their final
taxes in full on the 4th instalment receive a 2 percent discount. The Task Force requested the Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer to report on the recommendations in the motion, including how the
request will impact on the current system of billing.
Comments:
Municipalities offer discount programs to encourage taxpayers to pay their taxes in advance.
Discount programs offer the taxpayer a convenient payment option as well as a financial incentive
to improve the municipalities' cash flow. If interest rates are high, or if a substantial number of
taxpayers participate in the program, municipalities may benefit from increased interest income and
administrative efficiencies.
At its meeting on September 22, 1997, the Council of the former City of Toronto adopted a report
from the City Treasurer which recommended that the prepayment interest and discount program be
discontinued, starting with the 1998 tax year. The discount program was discontinued for the
following reasons:
(a) Experience indicated that the discount feature did not encourage taxpayers to pay earlier.
Analysis showed that the number of taxpayers receiving discount remained relatively
constant regardless of the discount rate. For example, the number of taxpayers that received
discount in 1990 (when the rate was 8 percent) was 79,729 compared to 76,831 taxpayers
that received discount in 1997 (when the rate was 1 percent). Approximately 20 percent of
the realty tax accounts that earned discount were paid by mortgage and property management
companies to reduce administrative costs. Taxpayers who spent the winter months out of the
country and other taxpayers found it more convenient to write one cheque for the interim tax
bill and one cheque for the final tax bill;
(b) The reduction in interest rates in the 1990's resulted in a corresponding decrease in discount
rates, from 8 percent in 1990 to 1 percent in 1997. The average annual discount earned by
each taxpayer dropped from $19.23 in 1990 to $2.66 in 1997. On an average tax bill of
$2,500.00, the total annual savings earned through the discount program was 0.11 percent;
(c) The installation of the new tax system in the spring of 1998 would allow taxpayers in the
former Toronto to pay their taxes through a preauthorized payment plan, an alternative and
convenient payment option that was not previously available due to system limitations;
(d) Elimination of the program resulted in savings for the city of $200,000.00 per annum, with
additional savings being realized through reduced administrative costs and business process
efficiencies, such as reduced staff time spent on processing journal entries related to the
discount; and
(e) Toronto was the only municipality which offered a discount. Discontinuing the program,
starting in 1998, established a uniform policy for the new City of Toronto which was in line
with the practices of the other former area municipalities.
Given the decision to discontinue the discount program in the former City of Toronto, the tax system
for the new City of Toronto did not incorporate a discount feature for the prepayment of taxes.
Existing Tax Billing and Payment Options:
Residents of the new City of Toronto currently have many options available for the billing and
payment of taxes. These currently include:
Billing Options:
(i) Taxes billed by instalment: Taxpayers who choose not to enrol in the preauthorized
payment plan have their taxes billed in three instalments for the interim tax bill
(February, March and April) and three instalments for the final tax bill (June, July
and August);
(ii) Preauthorized payment plan: Taxpayers who enrol in the preauthorized payment plan
can choose to have payments for taxes automatically withdrawn from their bank
account on the due dates for the six instalments, or in equal payments over 11 months
(February through December).
Payment Options:
(i) telephone or other bank payments;
(ii) post-dated cheques;
(iii) through their mortgage company;
(iv) through drop boxes located at all civic centres and most libraries;
(v) at cashier or tax office inquiry counters; and,
(vi) by mail.
A discount plan under Councillor Flint's motion would provide another payment option
where taxpayers would be required to pay their interim and/or final taxes in full on the first
due date for each of the billing cycles in order to receive a discount.
Proposed Discount Program:
The motion before the Task Force recommends that taxpayers who pay their taxes in full on the
fourth instalment (usually June in each year) receive a reduction or discount of 5 percent. The
motion also recommends that taxpayers who pay their interim taxes in full on the first instalment
(February) and their final taxes on the fourth instalment (June) receive a 2 percent reduction. The
table below shows the tax payments under the various payment options, as well as the annual savings
under the proposed discount program, for a taxpayer owning an average residential house assessed
at $220,000.00.
Table 1
Discount Earned under Proposed Discount Program
for Average Home Assessed at $220,000.00
|
Month |
Regular
Instalments |
Pre-Authorized Payment |
|
Proposed Discount Program |
6
Instalments |
11 Months |
|
2% Reduction on Interim
and Final Taxes if paid
on 1st & 4th Instalments |
5% Reduction on Final
Taxes if paid in full on
4th Instalment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Taxes
Levied |
$2,771.34 |
$2,771.34 |
$2,771.34 |
|
$2,771.34 |
$2,771.34 |
Taxes Paid - Various Payment Options |
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
|
|
|
|
February |
$461.89 |
$461.89 |
$251.94 |
|
$1,357.96 |
$461.89 |
March |
$461.89 |
$461.89 |
$251.94 |
|
|
$461.89 |
April |
$461.89 |
$461.89 |
$251.94 |
|
|
$461.89 |
May |
|
|
$251.94 |
|
|
|
June |
$461.89 |
$461.89 |
$251.94 |
|
$1,357.96 |
$1,316.39 |
July |
$461.89 |
$461.89 |
$251.94 |
|
|
|
August |
$461.89 |
$461.89 |
$251.94 |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
$251.94 |
|
|
|
October |
|
|
$251.94 |
|
|
|
November |
|
|
$251.94 |
|
|
|
December |
|
|
$251.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total - |
$2,771.34 |
$2,771.34 |
$2,771.34 |
|
$2,715.92 |
$2,702.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings - $ |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
($55.42) |
($69.28) |
Savings - % |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
-2.00% |
-2.50% |
The table below shows the cost to the City of providing discount under the proposed program for
every $100.00 of taxes paid in advance:
Table 2
Cost to City of Proposed Discount Program
per $100 in Taxes Paid in Advance
|
|
2% Discount - Full Payment on 1st & 4th
Instalments (Interim/Final) |
5% Discount - Full
Payment on 4th
Instalment (Final) |
|
Income earned on
full Interim paid |
Income earned on
full Final paid |
Income earned on
full Final paid |
Gross income earned per $100 of
taxes paid in advance |
$0.41 |
$0.96 |
$0.96 |
Less: Current income earned through
regular instalments (with no discount) |
($0.28) |
($0.28) |
($0.28) |
Additional income per $100 of taxes
paid in advance |
$0.13 |
$0.68 |
$0.68 |
Less: Discount paid |
($2.00) |
($2.00) |
($5.00) |
Net loss per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
($1.87) |
($1.32) |
($4.32) |
Assumptions:
1. Collection of $100.00 in taxes split between City and education (57.4 percent and
42.6 percent respectively) based on preliminary tax billing estimates for 1999.
2. City expenditures of $.574 assumed to occur evenly throughout the year.
3. Assumed investment interest rate of 5 percent.
Table 2 shows that a 2 percent reduction offered for the payment of interim and final taxes paid in
full on the first instalment dates in each of the billing cycles would result in the City losing $1.87
for every $100.00 in interim taxes and $1.32 for every $100.00 of final taxes paid in advance. A
5 percent reduction offered for the payment of final taxes in full would result in the City losing $4.32
for every $100.00 in taxes paid in advance. Based on a 5 percent take up of the proposed program,
the total loss to the City of 2 percent reduction would $2.02 million, and $2.73 million if a 5 percent
reduction was offered.
It should be noted that, under existing legislation, discounts are set by the municipality at a rate per
annum, with discount calculated on advance payments based on the number of days received prior
to the due date. For example, the discount that would be earned on $100.00 received in advance
would be calculated as follows:
$100 × Discount Rate × Number of days received prior to due date ÷ 365 = Discount earned
In 1994, the former City of Toronto considered changing its discount policy so that discount would
be earned only if interim taxes were paid in full on the first instalment, or final taxes were paid in
full on the fifth instalment. However, at that time, the City Solicitor of the former city advised that
there is no express authority in either piece of enabling legislation (the Municipal Act or MIDRA)
which would permit Council to allow discounts only on those prepayments of instalments made by
the 1st (interim) and 5th (final) due dates and there is no express authority in the legislation which
permits Council to draw distinctions in respect of which prepayments are entitled to discounts and
which are not.
In the former City of Toronto, approximately 50 percent of the realty tax accounts were credited
with discounts in 1997. The average discount earned in 1997 was $2.66 or 0.11 percent of taxes
levied for that account. As required under current legislation, discount was paid on any payment
received prior to an instalment date. Therefore, if a payment was made on February 11th for a
February 15th due date, the taxpayer's account would be credited with discount, although it would
not be significant. Similarly, where a taxpayer overpaid an instalment by $5.00, discount was paid
on that amount for the number of days it was received in advance of the next due date.
Consequently, while the number of accounts that received discount may appear significant, it is not
a true representation of the number of taxpayers who intentionally pre-paid their taxes to take
advantage of the discount.
The new City of Toronto may institute a discount program under the provisions of the Municipal Act
or MIDRA. However, in accordance with the legislation, any discount must be applied to all
payments made in advance of any due date and cannot be provided at differing rates depending on
when the payment is made. Therefore, the proposed discount program as set out in the motion is not
currently allowed under existing legislation.
Discount Rates:
Discount rates in the former City of Toronto were set annually, based on the prevailing interest
offered by financial institutions on daily interest savings accounts. However, during the mid-1990's,
when daily interest savings rates were less than 1 percent per annum, the City set its discount rate
at 2 percent as a discount rate of less than 1 percent would not encourage taxpayers to make
prepayments of taxes.
Councillor Flint's motion states that there may be financial advantages, such as additional
investment interest earned, when the full tax amount is received at the beginning of a billing cycle.
However, as noted in Table 2 above, such a discount program would result in a net financial loss to
the City.
Table 3 below shows the discount that would be earned by a taxpayer owning an average home
assessed at $220,000.00 using discount rates of 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent or 5 percent
per annum.
Table 3
Discount Earned for Average Home Assessed at $220,000 - Various Discount Rates
(Assumes Full Payment on 1st/4th Instalments - Interim and Final)
|
Instalment Due
Date |
Instalment
Amount |
Discount Rate
= 1% |
Discount Rate
= 2% |
Discount Rate
= 3% |
Discount Rate
= 4% |
Discount Rate
= 5% |
February |
$461.89 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
March |
$461.89 |
$0.35 |
$0.71 |
$1.06 |
$1.42 |
$1.77 |
April |
$461.89 |
$0.73 |
$1.49 |
$2.24 |
$2.99 |
$3.73 |
July |
$461.89 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
August |
$461.89 |
$0.38 |
$0.76 |
$1.14 |
$1.52 |
$1.90 |
September |
$461.89 |
$0.77 |
$1.54 |
$2.32 |
$3.09 |
$3.86 |
|
$2,771.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Savings -
$ |
|
$2.24 |
$4.51 |
$6.76 |
$9.01 |
$11.26 |
Annual Savings -
% |
|
0.08% |
0.16% |
0.24% |
0.33% |
0.41% |
Table 4 below shows the estimated income or loss to the City of a discount program, using discount
rates of 2 percent and 5 percent.
Table 4
Estimated Income/Loss to City per $100 in Taxes Paid in Advance
Discount Program Established under S. 399 of Municipal Act
|
|
Discount Rate = 2% |
|
Income earned - Interim
paid |
Income earned - Final paid |
|
16-Feb |
08-Mar |
05-Jul |
03-Aug |
Gross income earned per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
$0.433 |
$0.342 |
$0.703 |
$0.571 |
Less: Current income earned through regular
instalments (with no discount) |
($0.277) |
($0.277) |
($0.506) |
($0.506) |
Additional income per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
$0.156 |
$0.065 |
$0.197 |
$0.065 |
Less: Discount paid |
($0.066) |
($0.024) |
($0.075) |
($0.024) |
Net income/(loss) per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
$0.090 |
$0.041 |
$0.122 |
$0.041 |
|
16-Feb |
08-Mar |
05-Jul |
03-Aug |
Gross income earned per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
$0.431 |
$0.342 |
$0.699 |
$0.571 |
Less: Current income earned through regular
instalments (with no discount) |
($0.277) |
($0.277) |
($0.506) |
($0.506) |
Additional income per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
$0.154 |
$0.065 |
$0.193 |
$0.065 |
Less: Discount paid |
($0.158) |
($0.063) |
($0.200) |
($0.063) |
Net income/(loss) per $100 of taxes paid in
advance |
($0.004) |
$0.002 |
($0.007) |
$0.002 |
Assumptions:
1. Discount on instalments calculated as present value of amount due at instalment due date
to date paid (ie., March 8 due date paid Feb 16 discounted for 20 days).
2. Collection of $100.00 in taxes split between City and education (57.4 percent and
42.6 percent respectively) based on preliminary tax billing estimated for 1999. City
expenditures of $.574 assumed to occur evenly throughout the year.
3. Assumed yield earned/(charged) on cash balances.
4. Ratepayers making payment after February 16 or July 5 assumed to have made regular
instalment payment up to that point. |
With current interest rates on three month, six month and one year treasury bills earning interest at
4.77 percent, 4.85 percent and 4.88 percent respectively, the City should not offer a discount rate of
5 percent for the prepayment of taxes. However, Table 4 shows that a discount rate of 2 percent
would result in the City earning additional interest income, although the rate of return for every
$100.00 collected in advance is not substantial. With a maximum net yield of 0.12 percent, or
$1,218.00 for every $1 million in final taxes paid in full on the first instalment date of the final
billing cycle, a discount rate of 2 percent would likely result in the City not earning enough
additional interest income to offset the cost of establishing and administering a discount program.
In order to maximize additional interest income earned, in addition to recovering the cost of
administering a discount program, current interest rates would require the City to set a discount rate
at 1 percent or less. However, as shown in Table 3 above, a discount rate of 1 percent would save
the average residential taxpayer $2.24 per year. It is anticipated that annual savings for the average
taxpayer in this range would not encourage a sufficient number taxpayers to pay their taxes in
advance to justify establishing a discount program.
Discount Program - Implementation:
As a result of the decision to discontinue the discount program in the former Toronto, the tax system
for the new City does not include a discount feature. At present, there are other priority
developments and system requirements that rank ahead of a program for discount. For 1999,
significant tax system modifications are required in order to make the changes to the frozen
assessment listing. Due to the amalgamation, and the subsequent conversion from six tax systems
into one, additional programming changes or system enhancements underway include appeal
processing, BIA levies and interfaces to the general ledger. Due to the dedication of system
resources to these tasks, it is not possible to make the additional system modifications to include a
prepayment discount feature in time for the 1999 final tax billing. Therefore, if Council chooses to
implement a discount program, the earliest implementation date would be January 1, 2000.
Conclusion:
The proposed discount program as set out in the attached motion is not permitted under existing
legislation. If a municipality elects to have a discount program, the same discount rate must be paid
on any payment of any instalment paid in advance of the due date.
The residents of the City of Toronto have many options available for the payment of realty taxes.
Based on the experience of the former City of Toronto, offering a discount feature would not
encourage a substantial number of taxpayers to pay their taxes in advance of the due date. Due to
other policy developments and tax system modifications required for 1999, it is not possible to make
the additional system modifications to include a prepayment discount feature in time for the 1999
final tax billing. If Council chooses to implement a discount program, the earliest implementation
date is January 2000.
Contact Names:
Lynne Ashton, 397-4203
Paul Wealleans, 397-4208
(Motion of Councillor Flint made at Assessment and Task Policy Task Force, November 20, 1998.)
Whereas many residential property owners are uncomfortable with the monthly automatic
withdrawal system to pay their taxes; and
Whereas it is often convenient to make one or two tax payments rather than six; and
Whereas there are financial advantages (such as additional interest earned and reduced staff time)
when the full tax amount is received at the beginning of the payment year;
Therefore Be It Resolved that taxpayers who elect to pay a full year's taxes at the time of the 4th
instalment should qualify for a 5 percent discount; and
Be It Therefore Resolved that those who elect to pay in advance twice a year qualify for a 2 percent
discount.
17
Street Tree Planting Application
- Toronto Atmospheric Fund
Ward 10 (North York Centre) and
Ward 12 (North York Seneca Heights)
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:
"It is further recommended that the Tree Advocate, in consultation with the Commissioner
of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, be requested to develop a prioritization
process for tree planting projects which would permit all communities equal opportunity to
access funds, and submit a report thereon to the Economic Development and Parks
Committee.")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 3, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Economic Development, Culture and Tourism.
The Budget Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee and Council, having requested the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture
and Tourism to report back to the Economic Development and Parks Committee on the tree planting
program or the lack thereof.
Background:
The Budget Committee had before it a report (May 3, 1999) from the Commissioner of Economic
Development, Culture and Tourism advising that the application to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund
to obtain funds to offset the request in the Capital Budget has been declined; and recommending that
the Department proceed with the implementation of the project as originally set out in the 1999
Capital Works Program.
--------
(Report dated May 3, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the Commissioner of Economic
Development, Culture and Tourism)
Purpose:
The approved Capital Works Program includes $50,000.00 to fund the planting of approximately
130 large caliper trees in the North Parks and Recreation District. Budget Committee directed staff
to make application to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund to obtain funds to offset the request in the
Capital Budget and to report back if the application was declined. For the information of Committee,
the application to fund the planting was declined by the Toronto Atmospheric Fund.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Department proceed with the implementation of the project as originally
set out in the 1999 Capital Works Program.
Comments:
Staff completed an application to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund and submitted the application
January 28, 1999. At its meeting of March 23, 1999, the Board of Directors declined the application.
Although one of Toronto Atmospheric Fund's goals is "Create and preserve urban green spaces that
absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere", the Fund only supports special tree planting initiatives
that meet certain criteria, namely:
(1) strategic tree plantings that provide shade and/or wind breaks to buildings, thereby providing
reductions in heating or cooling needs, and lowering greenhouse gas emissions;
(2) Community projects which include an education and an outreach component; many of the
community tree-planting projects Toronto Atmospheric Fund supports are a doorway to more
extensive climate change projects in communities which Toronto Atmospheric Fund has not
been able to reach, such as communities in the former municipalities outside of the old
Toronto, or certain ethnic communities;
(3) tree plantings in new parks, such as Round House Park and Greenwood Park; and
(4) tree plantings on school grounds, as part of Toronto Atmospheric Fund's Cool Schools
Programs; the trees provide shade or wind breaks to the school, shade the playgrounds, or
are part of an overall naturalization plan for the school grounds.
While it is unfortunate that this project was not deemed a special tree planting, department staff
support the project as an improvement to the appearance of the area and the environmental benefits
of tree planting.
Contact Name:
Don Smith, Senior Coordinator, Research and Grants, 392-8412.
18
Transmittal of Evaluation of the
Leaside Neighbourhood Branch Library -
Capital Budget Project
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 10, 1999) from the City Librarian.
The Budget Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee and Council, having requested the City Librarian to report back to the Budget Advisory
Committee during the year 2000 Capital Budget process outlining cost savings due to efficiencies
in staffing and maintenance.
Background:
The Budget Committee had before it a report (May 10, 1999) from the City Librarian advising that
the Toronto Public Library Board on May 3, 1999, adopted the Leaside Neighbourhood Branch
Library report from the City Librarian, wherein it is recommended that:
(1) the Board adopt Option (2) as outlined in the Parkin Group report as the preferred option and
convey this to the Budget Committee in May 1999, as requested; and
(2) the Board proceed to working drawings for the new building in 1999, funded by expending
the balance of the 1999 capital allotment for the Leaside project estimated at $240,000.00.
--------
(Report dated May 10, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the City Librarian)
Attached for consideration of the Budget Committee at its meeting on May 25, 1999, is the Leaside
Neighbourhood Branch Library report (May 3, 1999) from the City Librarian, which was adopted
by the Toronto Public Library Board at its meeting on May 3, 1999, wherein it is recommended that:
(1) the Board adopt Option (2) as outlined in the Parkin Group report (April 26, 1999) as the
preferred option and convey this to the Budget Committee in May 1999, as requested; and
(2) the Board proceed to working drawings for the new building in 1999, funded by expending
the balance of the 1999 capital allotment for the Leaside project estimated at $240,000.00.
The report is provided in response to the Budget Committee's request for an overall evaluation of
the Leaside Public Library facility.
Project Cost Estimates (GST is excluded from all amounts)
Option 1 - Upgrade Existing Building
- Renovations to existing building including $1,362,409.00
construction of new elevator, barrier free
washroom and enlarged main entrance
- Professional fees and associated costs (10 percent) 136,000.00
- Furniture, fixtures and equipment 175,000.00
- Building permit fees at $12.00 per square metre 11,160.00
Total Project Cost Estimate (renovation) $1,684,569.00
Option 2 - New Building
- Construction of new 9,000 square feet library $1,477,211.00
including demolition of existing building
- Professional fees and associated costs (10 percent) 147,720.00
- Furniture, fixtures and equipment 175,000.00
- Building permit fees at $12.00 per square metre 10,800.00
Total Project Cost Estimate (new construction) $1,810,731.00
(Report dated May 3, 1999, addressed to the
Toronto Public Library Board from the City Librarian)
Purpose:
To present the results of the Feasibility Study to determine whether to retrofit or reconstruct Leaside
Neighbourhood Library.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Funding for the project was provided in the 1998 Capital Budget and further funds were approved
pending the City Librarian's report to the Budget Committee on an overall evaluation of the Leaside
Public Library facility.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the Toronto Public Library Board:
(1) adopt Option (2) as outlined in the Parkin Group report as the preferred option and convey
this to the Budget Committee in May 1999, as requested; and
(2) proceed to working drawings for the new building in 1999, funded by expending the balance
of the 1999 capital allotment for the Leaside project estimated at $240,000.00.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
In 1998, a capital budget of $235,000.00 was approved for the Leaside Neighbourhood Library to
provide barrier-free access to the building (elevators, washroom, automatic doors). Upon
undertaking the work for this project, difficulties associated with high water table escalated the cost
to $600,000.00.
As a result of the 1999 capital budget discussions, Council directed that the increase in expenditures
of $65,000.00 in 1999 and $300,000.00 in 2000 required for the Leaside Accessibility project be
approved pending the City Librarian's report to the Budget Committee on an overall evaluation of
the Leaside Public Library facility.
Overall concern was expressed about the $600,000.00 cost of providing barrier-free access when the
whole facility could be completely replaced at two-to-three times the cost. The expenditure was
considered not good value for money, particularly in view of the fact that other building deficiencies
would remain.
The Parkin Group was employed by Toronto Public Library to undertake an overall evaluation of
the Leaside Public Library.
The results of the Parkin Group study are two options, with costing provided for each. Option (1)
is for renovating the existing facility at just under $1.7 million. Option (2), the recommended option,
is for demolition of the existing facility and construction of a new facility at $1.8 million.
In assessing both options it is important to note that the renovation program to upgrade the existing
facility in Option (1) does not address a number of significant deficiencies, and there is no guarantee
as to the longevity of the building or equipment:
(a) An elevator is required in the retrofit option. In addition, the elevator doors will open
directly into the auditorium; there is no space for a vestibule or lobby area on the lower level.
(b) While the circulation desk service area will be enhanced with a renovation, site lines into the
adult and children's areas will remain problematic. It is anticipated that current staffing
levels at Leaside will remain unchanged. For those times when it is not possible to staff the
adult or children's desks, the circulation desk staff will continue to be responsible for service
in those areas and will have difficulty monitoring these activities.
(c) The stairway to the lower level is very steep. An investigation was undertaken to rebuild the
existing stairway that would see a decrease in the slope as well as eliminate the 90 degree
turn at the landing. However, such a significant redesign of the existing facility would
impact on space allocation (a minimum of eight feet would be lost in the auditorium), and
increase costs significantly. In the retrofit option, there is no change to the existing stair.
(d) There will continue to be inefficient use of space. There is no opportunity to rationalize
space allocation for collection and services; e.g., the proportion of adult and children's areas
and the opportunity to respond to local needs such as the addition of a local history
collections area.
(e) Energy efficiency of the building could be improved with the installation of insulation and
a vapour barrier on perimeter walls, but this upgrade may cause deterioration of the exterior
wall brickwork.
A significant investment of almost $1.7 million results in some important improvements to the
Leaside Library. However, the Library Board is left with a facility built in 1950 where a number of
deficiencies continue, and the life expectancy of the building and equipment remain uncertain.
Contact Names:
Ms. Ann Eddie, Director, Administration, 393-7091, Mr. Bruce Barnett, Senior Manager, Facilities,
395-5880.
(A copy of the Leaside Branch Feasibility Study referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded
to each Member of Council with the agenda of the Budget Committee meeting of May 25, 1999, and
a copy thereof is also on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
19
Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendations:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 5, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services.
Background:
The Budget Committee had before it a communication (May 19, 1999) from the City Clerk advising
that the Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee on May 19, 1999, recommended to the
Budget Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 5, 1999) from the Commissioner
of Community and Neighbourhood Services, wherein it is recommended that:
(1) City Council authorize the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to
enter into a funding agreement with Human Resources Development Canada for expansion
of Toronto Youth Job Corps for the period April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000, the total cost
of the agreement not to exceed $1,256,370.00 gross, and the City of Toronto's contribution
to the program not to exceed the approved 1999 operating budget for Job Corps of
$156,370.00;
(2) the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services identify and contract with an
appropriate non-profit organization to deliver the program in the Jane Finch area;
(3) the Community and Neighbourhood Services Department be authorized to budget for the
$74,000.00 net impact for the year 2000 budget;
(4) Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto program management and administration be immediately transferred from the Social Services Division to the Social
Development Division; and
(5) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
--------
(Communication dated May 19, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the City Clerk)
Recommendation:
The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee on May 19, 1999, recommended to the
Budget Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 5, 1999) from the Commissioner
of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth
Outreach Toronto.
Councillor Prue, at the meeting of the Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee on
May 19, 1999, declared his interest in the aforementioned report, in that his wife is an employee of
Human Resources Development Canada and is involved in determining grants that may be awarded
to various groups, including the City of Toronto.
--------
(Report dated May 5, 1999, addressed to the
Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Purpose:
This report recommends a number of changes to the Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach
Toronto programs. In conjunction with Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC), creation
of a new Job Corps site in the Jane Finch area is recommended. Reflecting recent changes to the
mandate of the Ontario Works program, transfer of responsibility for program administration from
the Social Services Division to the Social Development Division is proposed. Finally, authorization
is sought to begin discussions with HRDC regarding the future cost-sharing arrangements for the
programs.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no financial implications in 1999 beyond the approved operating budget for the Toronto
Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto programs and $74,000.00 net implication for the year
2000.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) City Council authorize the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to
enter into a funding agreement with HRDC for expansion of Toronto Youth Job Corps for
the period April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000, the total cost of the agreement not to exceed
$1,256,370.00 gross, and the City of Toronto's contribution to the program not to exceed the
approved 1999 operating budget for Job Corps of $156,370.00;
(2) the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services identify and contract with an
appropriate non-profit organization to deliver the program in the Jane Finch area;
(3) the Community and Neighbourhood Services Department be authorized to budget for the
$74,000.00 net impact for the year 2000 budget;
(4) Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto program management and
administration be immediately transferred from the Social Services Division to the Social
Development Division; and
(5) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Background:
Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto programs were initiated in 1983. Both
programs are designed to help severely employment disadvantaged youth in the City of Toronto.
Since their initiation, the programs have operated as a partnership between the Municipality of
Metropolitan Toronto and HRDC.
Youth Outreach Toronto is designed to assist youth who are reluctant to access mainstream programs
and services, and especially those who have given up in their frustrated efforts to find training,
education and job opportunities. Generally speaking, these youth have few skills, low educational
achievement and a host of other barriers including health issues, lack of stable housing, high levels
of illiteracy and extremely poor or non-existent work histories. Staff work on the streets and through
community agencies to provide counseling, information and referral services. Clients are linked to
services that will help prepare them to approach the labour market.
Toronto Youth Job Corps is recognized by youth serving agencies within Toronto as being the
program most able to work with Toronto's most barriered youth. Community agencies do not have
the resources available to work with this needy group and these agencies refer their hard to serve
youth to this program. Two agencies currently deliver Job Corps, namely St. Christopher House and
West Scarborough Neighbourhood Community Centre. The program is designed to help
disadvantaged youth secure and maintain employment through counseling, life skills training, work
experience and job placement.
Discussion:
Addressing Service Needs in Toronto:
At this time, reflecting an analysis of service gaps, HRDC has indicated their willingness to commit
$400,000.00 in new funds to cover the cost of program expansion in the Jane Finch area of Toronto.
City staff concur with HRDC regarding the need for a Job Corps program site in this part of the City.
The Jane Finch area is a high need area with limited youth services for "at risk" youth.
The inclusion of Job Corps in this area will provide services to a group of youth who desperately
need support in gaining employment.
The City is not being asked to contribute any new program funds in 1999 to cover the proposed
expansion. HRDC further acknowledges that the expansion of Job Corps will place additional
program administration demands on City staff. Given these added responsibilities, it is mutually
agreed that effective program delivery requires increased resources directed to program
co-ordination. For this reason, HRDC has offered to provide the City with funds to cover two-thirds
of a Co-ordinator's salary through to March 31, 2000. City funding exists within the 1999 approved
budget to cover the remaining one-third portion of the salary.
Rationalizing Program Management:
Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto are currently managed by the Social Services Division. The
programs have traditionally served a substantial number of unemployed youth who are not in receipt
of social assistance. Under the Ontario Works Act, passed in 1997, Toronto Social Services (TSS)
mandate is now focused on delivering services to Toronto residents who are eligible for social
assistance. Thus, the continued delivery of these programs falls outside of the Division's mandate.
In addition, youth on social assistance who would have been served by these programs in the past,
are now primarily assisted by Toronto Social Services caseworkers who have responsibility for
delivering employment services directly to these clients.
At the same time, continued City involvement in the management of these programs is critical. The
Social Development and Administration Division within the Community and Neighbourhood
Services Department, is well positioned to assume responsibility for these programs. Social
Development has the corporate lead on a number of initiatives aimed at vulnerable and unemployed
youth, and also works with a wide range of community organizations delivering a range of programs
to Toronto youth. The addition of the Job Corps and Youth Outreach Toronto complements these
responsibilities, and will allow for more effective co-ordination of youth programs within the
Division. It should also be noted that the proposed program co-ordinator position will be responsible
for a range of youth employment initiatives including Job Corps, Youth Outreach Toronto, squeegee
diversion, and Youth Employment Counseling Centre funding.
Future Funding Issues:
Currently, the two existing Job Corps sites are funded 90 percent HRDC, employer's contributions,
and the Province of Ontario. The remaining 10 percent is provided by the City of Toronto. While
covering the costs of program expansion in 1999, HRDC has requested that the City contribute to
the new Job Corps site in Jane Finch at the same cost-sharing level as the two existing Job Corps
programs, beginning April 1, 2000. At this date, the City's 10 percent contribution for the new site
will be $60,000.00 net.
As noted, HRDC has also agreed to cost-share a City program co-ordinator position providing
two-thirds of the salary in 1999. However, beginning in April 2000, HRDC is proposing that this
salary be shared on a 50/50 basis with the City, requiring an additional annual City commitment of
approximately $14,000.00. The total funding commitment from the City in 2000 will thus rise by
$74,000.00 net. In conjunction with HRDC staff, the City will negotiate final funding arrangements
for the period beginning April 1, 2000, in an effort to ensure that necessary program supports
continue to be available to vulnerable youth in the Jane Finch area.
Conclusion:
Aligning the range of current youth related initiatives in one program area will facilitate increased
consistency and co-ordination in the provision of youth services. The expansion of Job Corps to add
a third delivery site will increase the availability of employment related services to disadvantaged
youth in a high need area of the City of Toronto. City staff will continue to meet with HRDC
officials to review our mutual objectives and co-ordinate youth programming and initiatives. Staff
will report on the implications of the revised cost-sharing arrangement for these programs as part of
the year 2000 budget cycle.
Contact Names and Telephone Numbers:
Ms. Heather MacVicar, General Manager, Tel: 392-8952, Mr. Chris Brillinger, Manager,
Community Resource Unit, Tel: 392-8608.
--------
(Communication dated May 17, 1999, addressed to
Ms. Dianne Bradley, Director General, Service Delivery,
Human Resources Development Canada from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Thank you for your letter dated April 20, 1999. I too am pleased with the long standing working
relationship between the City of Toronto and Human Resources Development Canada. In particular,
I appreciate your support in the amalgamation of youth services within the City of Toronto.
A report will be forwarded to the Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee on May 19,
1999, outlining the program administration changes for both Toronto Youth Job Corps and Youth
Outreach Toronto. The report will also outline the agreement between Human Resources
Development Canada and the City of Toronto with respect to funding for the management position.
Funding for the City of Toronto is determined one fiscal year at a time, and as such approval for
funding arrangements beyond 1999 cannot be approved at this time. The Community and
Neighbourhood Services Department is committed to the current funding arrangement and to
supporting the continuation of our relationship with Human Resources Development Canada in this
area in the future.
I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation of Human Resources Development
Canada's ongoing support and commitment to the City's youth employment initiatives.
Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly or alternatively
Ms. Carol Williams at 397-7301.
(Communication dated April 20, 1999, addressed to the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services
from Ms. Dianne Bradley, Director General, Service Delivery,
Human Resources Development Canada)
I would like to open by saying how pleased I am with the quality of the working relationship which
exists between Human Resources Development Canada and the City of Toronto.
Our collaboration of longest standing is certainly our joint activity in support of youth employment,
namely the Toronto Youth Job Corps, the Youth Outreach Program and, more recently, Mayor Mel's
Youth Initiative and the Squeegee Diversion Initiative. As you know, Minister Claudette Bradshaw
announced on March 26, 1999, the addition of a third site to the Toronto Youth Job Corps program
to provide services in the northern area of the City. I particularly appreciate the support of your staff
in helping us get this site in operation as soon as possible. The Federal government will be fully
funding this site for its first year of operation (1999-2000). At this time, I would like to request the
City of Toronto to begin to participate financially in the operation of the third site in the same
proportion (10 percent) as the City's support for the current two sites in the fiscal year 2000-2001.
We will also be encouraging the third site to develop positive and productive relationships with the
Ontario Government's Job Connect program and with private sector partners.
My staff have had several positive meetings with your staff on the best way to offer organizational
support to our jointly funded youth activity. I do support the proposal of amalgamating all youth
employment focussed activity within the Social Development Division. I do understand this move
will require the support of a full time manager. This position is currently funded one third through
your contribution to the Toronto Youth Job Corps Program. Human Resources Development
Canada is willing to fund the remaining two thirds of this position for the current fiscal year
(1999-2000).
Our preference over time, however, is to move to a 50/50 share of this position by the next budget
year.
I appreciate your consideration of these requests. Please contact myself or Ms. Lesley Buresh at
462-7310, for additional information you might require. Thank you, again, for all your support to
date.
20
Homes for the Aged - 1999 Operating Budget
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendation of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk:
Recommendations:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 20, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services.
Background:
The Budget Committee had before it a report (May 20, 1999) from the Commissioner of Community
and Neighbourhood Services providing an analysis of the impact and an exploration of the options
that a reinvestment of Provincial funding would have on the Homes for the Aged and recommending
that:
(1) the 1999 operating budget for the Homes for the Aged be increased by $697,000.00 to enable
the Division to access additional Provincial funding, which is available to enhance nursing
services;
(2) this report be referred to the Community Services Committee for discussion of the policy
issues and options outlined herein; and
(3) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
--------
(Report dated May 20, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)
Purpose:
The purpose of this report is to provide an analysis of the impact and an exploration of the options
that a reinvestment of Provincial funding would have on the Homes for the Aged.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
The Ministry of Health has confirmed additional funding for long-term care facilities provided that
the funding is used to create professional nursing jobs. The Homes for the Aged Division is seeking
City Council approval to increase the 1999 operating budget by $697,000.00 (gross). There is a
requirement for these new funds to be used specifically for the purpose of enhancing professional
nursing services. The funding represents a permanent adjustment to long-term care facility funding
from the Ministry of Health and does not result in an increase in municipal net contribution.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the 1999 operating budget of the Homes for the Aged be increased by $697,000.00 to enable
the Division to access additional Provincial funding, which is available to enhance nursing
services;
(2) this report be referred to the Community Services Committee for discussion of the policy
issues and options outlined herein; and
(3) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
Council Reference/Background/History:
During the Budget Committee's review of the Homes for the Aged Division's 1999 operating
budget, it was requested that the Division report to the Community and Neighbourhood Services
Committee and the Budget Committee on the significant loss of Provincial funding since 1996. The
request was made in light of the Federal government's February 16, 1999 announcement that stated
that transfers to the provinces and territories were to increase over the next five years by
$11.5 billion through the Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST).
In the Federal government's announcement, Finance Minister Paul Martin stated that a further
$1.4 billion will be invested over the next three years to strengthen Canada's health system through
research and innovation, health information, improved health services for First Nations, and
prevention. The announced increases effectively restore Federal transfer payments for health care
to levels that were in effect when the present government came to power.
Accordingly, the Budget Committee directed staff to study and report back at a subsequent meeting
the impact that a restoration of Provincial subsidy would have on the Division if funding were to be
restored to the 1996 subsidy level. The report was to include options of expanding the number of
available beds, improving the personal care level, as well as other service restructuring restorations.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
Long-Term Care Reform:
For many years, the long-term care (LTC) system in Ontario has been under tremendous pressure
to reform. In the early 1990s, the Provincial government brought together long-term care facility and
community programs under one new administrative structure. These programs had previously been
the responsibility of separate Ministries, even though the programs served essentially the same client
base. In the past, homes for the aged were the responsibility of the Ministry of Community and
Social Services and nursing homes were the responsibility of the Ministry of Health. The Ministry
of Health is now fully responsible for the funding and administration of all long-term care programs.
During the years that homes for the aged were under the Ministry of Community and Social Services,
they were encouraged to design large facilities and dramatically expand and enrich the programs and
services provided to their residents. Many municipalities and some charitable boards took advantage
of this support and the cost sharing arrangements with the province to enhance their operations,
resulting in higher per diems than other sectors of LTC facility care. To achieve some control of
these costs, capping on Provincial contributions was introduced in 1989 in cases where the extended
care per diem exceeded the Provincial average.
When the Long-Term Care Statute Law Amendment Act, 1993 (Bill 101), an Act to amend the three
long-term care facility Acts, came into effect on July 1, 1993, the Province introduced a red-circling
provision. Homes for the Aged were guaranteed to have their current level of care and staffing
protected during the transition to a funding system that was to be based on resident care needs.
Because of Provincial funding constraints, the long-term care system was able to fund only facilities
with an extremely modest per diem of $79.61 in 1993. For the Toronto Homes for the Aged, this
created a significant shortfall because the Division's operating per diem was $147.58 at that time.
This represented approximately $25.0 million in red-circle funding for the Toronto Homes for the
Aged.
When the Province determined it would take too many years for the LTC system to be equalized, the
Ministry of Health decided to eliminate red-circling by phasing it out over a two to four-year period.
The elimination of red-circle funding commenced on June 1, 1996. Of Toronto's 10 Homes for the
Aged, five Homes continue to receive a moderate amount of red-circle funding. Red-circle funding
accounts for only $1.6 million of the Division's 1999 operating budget revenue. However, the final
reduction in red-circle funding has been effectively offset as a result of the recently announced
increase in level of care funding.
Toronto Homes for the Aged:
Historically, Toronto's Homes for the Aged have cared for residents who other facilities and service
providers find difficult to manage. The average resident in a Toronto Home has three to five chronic
diseases, including heart disease, chronic obstructed lung disease, kidney/liver organ failure and
other debilitating diseases. Seventy percent of the Homes' residents are cognitively impaired with
dementia diseases such as Alzheimer's Disease.
Toronto's Homes for the Aged Division has a recognized history of and commitment to
client-centred, interdisciplinary care and quality of life issues. In response to this commitment, the
Division historically staffed at a fairly high level, particularly in the nursing, recreation,
rehabilitation, and social work areas. Prior to 1993, both the Province and Council supported the
enhancement of staffing levels, based on a commitment to providing vulnerable seniors with quality
care and quality of life. In more recent years, affordability has become an issue, and the level of care
and service has been substantially reduced.
The Homes for the Aged Division has been proactive over the past six years in adjusting to the new
Provincial funding system. The Division needed to realize significant budget savings during that
time in order to respond to the continuing financial pressures of reduced funding. In addition to
reduced Provincial funding, the Division's municipal contribution has been decreased by $9.7 million
or 29.6 percent since 1993. Expenditure reductions primarily focused on cost-controls and improved
resource utilization. Net savings were realized through program restructuring and staff downsizing.
A comprehensive management plan that restructured the organization, streamlined operations,
delayered management, identified numerous operational efficiencies, maximized revenue and formed
strong community partnerships was implemented. The plan responded to the need for affordability
and spending restraint, but did not abandon the concepts of quality, public service, and public
accountability, concepts that the community clearly expects from the municipality.
Management identified numerous innovative and creative approaches to maintaining quality services
for our clients during a time in which the Division experienced a significant loss of funding. The
ways in which the Homes' services are delivered and resources are allocated have been reviewed and
improved. The Division's long term plan contained the expectation that level of care facility funding
would be adjusted to more accurately reflect the true cost of providing care and services to seniors.
New management levels and staffing standards were introduced across the Division and new sources
of revenue identified. A client-centred approach to care and service was maintained as efficiencies
were implemented in all areas of the Homes' operations. As the Division restructured, the focus on
customer service remained. The Division continues to plan strategically and improve operationally
in order to maintain effectiveness in a more diverse, competitive, and changing long-term care
environment.
As part of the Division's strategic planning process, the following options are offered for
consideration:
Option 1 - Expanding the Number of Beds:
On April 29, 1998, Ontario's Premier and Minister of Health jointly announced the Province's
Multi-year Investment Plan for Long-Term Care. The investment plan involves the commitment of
$1.2 billion annually to expand and improve long-term care services across Ontario. This infusion
of redirected monies from hospital services adds 20,000 new beds into homes for the aged and
nursing homes. The Province also targeted money for rebuilding and renovating more than 100 older
facilities to comply with the new long-term care facility design standards which were released at the
beginning of May 1998.
On May 1, 1998, the Ministry of Health released the allocated figures for facility and community
reinvestments. For facility-based care, 5,837 new beds (out of the 20,000 Provincial figure) have
been allocated for the Toronto region over the next six years. This amounts to a $190.9 million
reinvestment. A request for proposal process was conducted by the province in mid-1998 for
2,200 beds in Toronto (6,700 beds across Ontario). The call was open to both the non-profit and
for-profit sectors. Although the City of Toronto did not bid on any new beds, the Toronto Homes
for the Aged Division provided consulting services to Doctors' Hospital in the development and
presentation of their proposal. The Doctors' Hospital bid was strengthened by the Division's offer
to provide consulting services for a multi-year period while Doctors' Hospital developed their own
expertise in long-term care. Doctors' Hospital was awarded 200 long-term care beds.
The recently announced second phase of the Ontario government's six-year expansion plan will
increase the long-term care system by a further 5,790 beds throughout various regions across the
province, including the City of Toronto, where there are 744 beds available. A further 2,893 beds
will be offered within Toronto in future phases of the expansion plan. Proposals during this phase
must be submitted by 12:00 noon on July 30, 1999.
Level of care funding has been enhanced in recent years. A Home for the Aged with a Provincial
average case mix index of 100 will receive per diem funding of $95.64. If the City's 1996 funding
level were to be restored by means of the City of Toronto pursuing new long-term care beds, the City
could consider submitting a bid to acquire 200 new long-term care beds, and thereby open a new
Home for the Aged. This option would require the City to make a capital investment of
approximately $12.0 million and also to restore a portion of the Division's previously achieved net
operating savings in order to sustain quality and service levels consistent with the City's other
10 Homes for the Aged.
Option 2 - Improving the Personal Care Level:
Following the Federal Budget, the Ontario Government announced new investments in health
nursing services. On March 17, 1999, Long-Term Care Minister Cam Jackson and Health Minister
Elizabeth Witmer announced $20.0 million in annual funding to increase the number of frontline
nurses available in long-term care facilities.
The additional funding available to long-term care facilities is being provided to enhance support
for professional nursing staff and must be used to create professional nursing jobs. This represents
a permanent adjustment to long-term care facility funding and will not result in a municipal
contribution. For the Toronto Homes, the annualized funding enhancement is approximately
$1.0 million. However, in order to access these funds the Homes for the Aged Division requires City
Council's approval to increase the 1999 operating budget by $697,000.00 for nursing and personal
care. The Ministry of Health has implemented stringent reporting requirements to ensure that these
new funds are directed solely towards enhancing the nursing and personal care of residents.
Staff are very pleased regarding the newly announced funding for nursing services, as it provides the
first opportunity for a significant number of years to marginally enhance the level of nursing care
provided to residents, rather than to continue another year of nursing reductions. Senior management
have not yet determined the best allocation of the available funding, and will utilize data from the
various Homes (including information related to the classification of resident need, feedback from
satisfaction surveys, etc.) to make final decisions. However, senior management's initial opinion is
that the best value would be realized by utilizing the funding to increase both registered nurse and
registered practical nurse hours (up to 10 percent of the available funding can be used for other
nursing expenses, such as the nursing supplies required to deliver more complex care). The exact
number of registered nurse versus registered practical nurse hours would vary on an individual Home
basis, according to the needs assessment of that Home. Initial estimate is that the funding would
allow for the increase of approximately 15 nursing FTEs across the 10 Homes.
It is hoped that the recent nursing announcement is the first of a series of reinvestments in long-term
care. As long-term care facilities are expected to deal with more and more residents with serious
health conditions and complex continuing care requirements, it will be imperative for the Ministry
of Health to reinvest health savings into the long-term care system. Other minor increases in base
funding are currently being planned by the Ministry of Health. Moving into the year 2000, the
opportunity will exist for the Division to begin receiving Provincial funding increases rather than
reductions in subsidy since the final phase of red-circle funding elimination will have been
implemented.
Senior management has been actively involved in on-going discussions with the Ministry of Health
to secure additional permanent funding for the Homes' program. As a result, it is anticipated that
new monies will be made available to the City within the next year. This will possibly enable the
Division to restore some of the previously eroded care levels.
Option 3 - Other Service Restructuring Restorations:
In response to the funding pressures in recent years, the Division has been required to reduce the
service level of certain programs that serve to enhance the quality of life of residents. These
services, although not all considered mandatory by the Ministry of Health, are considered by the
Division to be essential for residents' health and sense of general well-being. The services that fall
into this category are typically those funded in the "programs and support services envelope", and
include services such as recreation, rehabilitation, complementary care, social work, spiritual and
religious care, volunteer services, etc. If funding was restored to the Division, management would
target some of the restored funding to expand service in these areas.
For example, the value of rehabilitation services (i.e., rehabilitation workers, occupational therapists,
physiotherapists) to residents in the Homes is unquestionable, as it relates to the achievement of the
Division's goal of promoting residents' independence, maintaining/improving residents' functional
abilities (including behaviours), and preventing/delaying deterioration due to the natural aging
process or chronic disease. An increase in rehabilitation service would add value to the Division's
overall care and service delivery, particularly as the acuity of residents' care needs continues to
increase.
Second, over 137,000 hours of volunteer services were contributed amongst the 10 Homes in 1998.
This level of volunteerism far exceeds the average rate of volunteer participation amongst most other
providers. The Division believes that additional staff support in the area of volunteer recruitment
and coordination would help the homes to realize increased volunteer involvement and volunteer
satisfaction, which directly impacts on resident satisfaction. Without question, volunteerism
provides residents with an important linkage to the community. In return, community volunteers
augment residents' quality of life and contribute substantial dollars through their fundraising
initiatives.
Quality of life issues are also addressed by the provision of recreational programs and
complementary care services (e.g., massage therapy, music therapy, art therapy, aromatherapy). Both
of these services focus on residents as individuals and contribute to their psychosocial and physical
wellbeing. In the past academic year, the Division has been able to offer student placement to a
number of complementary care students, and these services have been exceptionally well received
by residents and their families. Senior management is currently exploring the feasibility of adding
complementary care services, on a more regular basis, if increased funding becomes available to
cover the costs of same. Likewise, resident and family feedback provides evidence that both of these
groups would like to see an expansion of recreation services, particularly in the evening hours and
on weekends.
Next, an ever-increasing emphasis for the Division is the critical need to support staff by ensuring
that they have access to both on-site and off-site educational offerings, in order to assist them gain
and maintain the skills required to competently provide care and service to the Homes' residents and
families. Individuals admitted to the Homes are frailer, and have more complex care requirements
than several years ago. The Homes are becoming the "new" chronic care facilities, and the Division
believes that it should take a proactive role in providing ways and means for staff to upgrade their
skills.
Senior management is in the process of confirming a plan, identifying which programs and service
areas should be expanded, as a priority, in order to add the most value to residents' lives, if some of
the past funding is restored. The cost associated with restoring a portion of the residents' programs
and support services would be minimal with substantial returns being measured in the provision of
quality care to our residents.
Conclusion:
Over the past six years, the Division has been extremely successful in reducing costs and maintaining
quality, in response to the funding reductions imposed. However, senior management has the
philosophical belief that seniors residing in long-term care facilities deserve a higher level of care
and service, particularly in the nursing and programs and services areas, than is supported through
current Provincial funding and/or policy. Staff have done a laudable job over the past number of
years; however, they have become increasingly more frustrated with their inability to provide the
high level of attentive, individualized care that they believe the elderly are entitled to.
For this reason, if there is a potential to achieve further restoration of funding, it would be
management's preferred direction to expand the level of care and service provided to the residents
currently cared for in the Division's 10 Homes. Prior to the introduction of any resource expansion,
it would be management's intention to implement new performance measures, in order to track,
manage, and measure efficiencies, effectiveness, and satisfaction.
On the other hand, if City Council made a decision to direct staff to explore the possibility of adding
beds to the Homes for the Aged Division's system, immediate action would be required, as the
Ministry of Health's current Request for Proposals (RFP) for new long-term care beds closes on
July 30, 1999 at 12:00 noon. Based on current information, there is reason to believe that there will
not be another RFP released until at least 2001.
Contact Name:
Reg Paul, Director, Financial and Administrative Services, Tel: 392-8896; Fax: 392-4180; E-mail:
reg_paul@toronto.ca.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following communication
(May 31, 1999) from Ms. Anne Dubas, President, Local 79, Canadian Union of Public
Employees:
This report provides information on potential sources of additional funding for the Homes for the
Aged. It notes that there will be a Request for Proposals (RFP) for long-term care beds issued by
the Provincial government, with a July 30, 1999 deadline (option 1).
A new Home for the Aged in an area of the city which is presently under-served would be a proud
asset for Toronto. The downloading of expenses to the City by the Province has had a negative
impact o n our infrastructure. By responding to this RFP, we will gain a long-term investment which
will enhance the infrastructure - paid for by the Province.
We recognize that it will result in additional operating costs, but the fact is this will probably be the
last RFP until at least the year 2001. If we shut the door now by not taking advantage of this
opportunity, then will not be serving the elderly on the long waiting lists in the community.
The Homes for Aged Division has the expertise to make a successful application for some of these
new long-term care beds. It teamed up with the Doctors' Hospital for the last round of allocations
and the hospital was awarded 200 beds.
We believe that the City has a responsibility to plan strategically so that there are enough beds for
seniors in the future. We would ask this Committee to recommend that the General Manager of the
Homes for the Aged Division respond to this Request for Proposals before the July deadline.
--------
Ms. Anne Dubas, President, CUPE Local 79, accompanied by Ms. Carmen Smith,
Secretary-Treasurer, appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee in connection
with the foregoing matter.
21
Use of Sponsorship Revenues from Molson's Sponsorship
Agreement for the Construction of Water Park Facilities
(Wards 19 and 25 - High Park and Don River)
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the
Recommendations of the Budget Committee embodied in the following communication
(May 26, 1999) from the City Clerk, subject to amending Recommendation No. (1) to read as
follows:
"(1) the cost of the design and construction of two water parks located at
Regent Park and at a new park site in the King and Dufferin Street area
be fully funded from revenues obtained from the Molson's Sponsorship
Agreement and through donations obtained from local businesses;"
Recommendations:
The Budget Committee on May 25, 1999, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, subject to the following:
(1) deleting Recommendation No. (1) and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
"(1) the cost of the design and contribution of two water parks located at
Regent Park and at a new park site in the King and Dufferin Street
area be fully funded from revenues obtained from the Molson's
Sponsorship Agreement through donations obtained from local
businesses;"
(2) adding the following:
"the future funding from sponsorship revenues for water park facilities be
part of the Capital Budget process with the source of funding to be identified
as being from sponsorship revenues."
The Budget Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee and Council, having requested the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture
and Tourism to report back to the Economic Development and Parks Committee providing a plan
as to the prioritization of the location of water parks keeping in mind the long list of wading pool
renovations that are outstanding.
Background:
The Budget Committee had before it a communication (May 21, 1999) from the City Clerk advising
that the Economic Development Committee on May 21, 1999, recommended to the Budget
Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, and requested the Budget Committee to consider any
adjustment to the Capital Budget in that regard and report thereon to the Strategic Policies and
Priorities Committee for its June 1, 1999 meeting for consideration by Council of this matter on
June 9, 1999.
--------
(Communication dated May 21, 1999, addressed to the
Budget Committee from the City Clerk)
Recommendations:
The Economic Development Committee recommends that the report (May 4, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be adopted, and forwards this matter
to the Budget Committee for consideration at its meeting on May 25, 1999 with respect to any
adjustment to the Capital Budget, and, further, that the Budget Committee report to the Strategic
Policies and Priorities Committee for its June 1, 1999 meeting for consideration by Council of this
matter on June 9, 1999.
The Economic Development Committee reports, for the information of the Budget Committee,
having requested the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism to report to
the Economic Development and Parks Committee on:
(1) criteria on the selection of future sites for water park facilities, prior to consideration during
the Capital Budget Process; and
(2) an inventory of the range of equipment and services provided by the water park facilities, and
proposals to harmonize such facilities.
Background:
At its meeting on May 21, 1999, the Economic Development Committee had before it the report
(May 4, 1999) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism regarding
the Use of Sponsorship Revenues from Molson's Sponsorship Agreement for the Construction of
Water Park Facilities (High Park and Don River - Wards 19 and 25), responding to the Economic
Development Committee's request at its meeting on November 16, 1998, for a report on the
provision of funding for the construction of new water parks in the City of Toronto, and
recommending that:
(1) the costs for the design and construction of two water parks, located at Regent Park and at
a new park site in the King Street and Dufferin Street area, be partially offset from revenues
obtained from the 1999 Molson's Breweries Sponsorship Agreement for the sale of
"Toronto's Own Beer"; and
(2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give
effect thereto.
The Committee also had before it a map depicting the present locations of water parks throughout
the City.
--------
(Report dated May 4, 1999, addressed to the
Economic Development Committee from the
Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)
Purpose:
The purpose of this report is to respond to the Economic Development Committee's request at its
meeting held on November 16, 1998, for a report on the provision of funding for the construction
of new water parks in the City of Toronto.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
The revenues obtained from this sponsorship agreement will partially offset the cost of two water
park facilities.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the costs for the design and construction of two water parks, located at Regent Park and at
a new park site in the King Street and Dufferin Street area, be partially offset from revenues
obtained from the 1999 Molson's Breweries Sponsorship Agreement for the sale of
"Toronto's Own Beer"; and
(2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take and directed to take the
necessary action to give effect thereto.
Comments:
At its meeting of November 16, 1998, the Economic Development Committee requested that the
Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report on the feasibility of allocating
revenues from the proposed sponsorship agreement between the City of Toronto and Molson's
Breweries for the sale of "Toronto's Own Beer" for the construction of new water park facilities in
the City.
The proposed sponsorship agreement was approved by City Council at its meeting of February 2,
3 and 4, 1999, and has been signed by both parties. Revenues from this agreement, in the amount
of $150,000.00, are currently available to offset the design and construction of a water park facility
in the Regent Park Housing Complex (in the Dundas Street and River Street area), which would
involve retrofitting an existing wading pool to a water play facility.
The construction costs of another water park facility, in a new park site in South Parkdale (in the
King Street and Dufferin Street area) would also be partially offset by these sponsorship funds. The
remainder of the costs for this facility would be offset by donations obtained from local businesses
in the area.
The use of these funds for the development of two water park facilities would be very beneficial to
the local communities they would serve. The numerous requests for these types of facilities could
not be met in the 1999 Capital Budget Program. Six of these facilities are funded in this year's
budget, none of which will be located in the former City of Toronto. These two projects will serve
two older neighbourhoods characterized by high densities and a high proportion of families with
children.
These facilities could not be built otherwise and would have to be included in the list of projects to
be considered in next year's Capital Budget. If approved, these projects would be expedited so they
would be open in time for the 1999 summer season.
The five-year sponsorship agreement with Molson does not stipulate how the revenues generated
from the sale of "Toronto's Own Beer" must be spent, nor does it require any on-site recognition of
Molson's Breweries as sponsor. The Department will report to this Committee on the best use of
these funds on an annual basis for the duration of the agreement.
Conclusion:
It is recommended that the revenues obtained from the Molson's Sponsorship Agreement be
allocated to two water park projects, one in Regent Park and the other in South Parkdale (in the new
park located near King and Dufferin Streets). If approved, these projects, which are very beneficial
to their communities, will be expedited so they are operational in time for the 1999 summer season.
Contact Name:
Frank Kershaw, 392-8199.
(Copies of the map depicting the present locations of water parks through out the City, referred to
in the foregoing report were forwarded to all Members of Council with the June 1, 1999, agenda of
the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and a copy thereof is also on file in the office of the
City Clerk.)
22
1999 Operating Budget - Follow Up Items
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, amended this Clause by deleting Recommendations
Nos. (1)(a) and (b) embodied in the report dated May 27, 1999, from the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
"(1) that Recommendation No. (214) embodied in Clause No. 1 of Report No. 8 of The
Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, be amended to read as follows, and that
such recommendation, as so amended, be adopted:
'(214) With respect to the report dated April 8, 1999, "Policy on Interest Paid on
Assessment Appeal Refunds Financial Implications of Interest Paid on
Prime", from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the said report
incorporating the following recommendations be adopted;
(i) the interest on assessment appeal refunds for 1997 and prior tax
years be calculated based on the policies and rates that existed in
each of the former area municipalities at that time;
(ii) that the rate of interest to be paid by the City of Toronto on
assessment appeal refunds relating to the 1998 tax year and onward,
from one month from the date the Notice of Decision from the
Assessment Review Board is received by the City, to the date of
refund, be set at the average rate paid by the banks as listed on
Schedule 1 of the Bank Act on one-year GICs as determined by the
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, from time to time;
(iii) that the Province of Ontario be requested to pay interest on
assessment appeal refunds for 1998 and onward, from the date of
overpayment to the date of the Notice of Decision from the
Assessment Review Board, and that the rate of interest to be paid at
the same rate of interest set by the City;
(iv) that By-law No. 29097 of the former City of North York, which allows
for the payment of interest on assessment appeal refunds for
properties in the former City of North York, be amended to reflect the
changes as set out in Recommendations Nos. (ii) and (iii) above;
(v) that the former City of Toronto's Municipal Code be amended to
provide that any overpayments made on, or after, January 1, 1998,
which are eligible for assessment appeal refunds, shall have the
interest applied from one month from the date that the Notice of
Decision is received from the Assessment Review Board by the
City; and
(vi) that the City Solicitor be authorized to submit the necessary by-law
to give effect to these recommendations.' ")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the following
report (May 27, 1999) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer:
Purpose:
To provide follow up information to the 1999 Operating Budget, specifically, the payment of
interest on assessment appeals, options for the use of the estimated $46.2 million OMERS surplus
to be received by the City in 1999 and 2000 and in-year capital approvals.
Financial Implications:
Funding in the amount of $3.6 million is currently provided in the 1999 Operating Budget under
Non-Program Expenditures for the payment of interest on assessment appeals.
The funds originating from the deferral of the OMERS premium that resulted from the above-average performance of their investment portfolio, will impact either the City's reserve fund
or debt position, depending upon the disposition of these funds.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
1(a) the recommendations as contained in Recommendation No. 214 of Strategic Policies and
Priorities Committee Report No. 8, Clause 1 (April 26 and 27, 1999), regarding payment of
interest on assessment appeal refunds, be adopted with an amendment to Recommendation
No. (ii) to delete the words "six major Canadian chartered banks" and replace with "banks
as listed on Schedule 1 of the Bank Act";
1(b) if Council adopts the motion of Councillor Adams, and the revised recommendations as
outlined in this report, Recommendation No. (ii) should be revised to delete the words "six
major Canadian chartered banks" and replace with "banks as listed on Schedule 1 of the
Bank Act"; and recommendation (v) be revised to read:
"(v) that the former City of Toronto's Municipal Code be amended to provide that any
overpayments made on, or after January 1, 1998, which are eligible for assessment
appeal refunds, shall have interest applied from one month from the date that the
Notice of Decision is received from the Assessment Review Board by the City;"
(2) the recommendations as contained in Recommendation No. 213 of Strategic Policies and
Priorities Committee Report No. 8, Clause 1 (April 26 and 27, 1999), regarding financing
of the 1999 capital works program, be adopted; and
(3) prior to consideration of any in-year changes following Council approval of the capital works
program for new or expanded initiatives, such requests be referred to the Chief
Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for report thereon to
the Policy and Finance Committee on the full cost and source of funds for such initiatives.
Background:
At its meeting of April 26 and 27, 1999, City Council adopted, as amended, Strategic Policies and
Priorities Report No. 8, Clause 1 (1999 Operating Budget and 1999 Capital Financing Plan - Tax
Supported Program) and in doing so, Council adopted Recommendations 213 and 214, subject to
a further report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to Council for its next meeting on
May 11, 1999, through the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, on the following motions:
Moved by Councillor Adams:
"That the Clause be amended by striking out Parts (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) embodied in
Recommendation No. (214) of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and inserting
in lieu thereof the following new Parts (ii) and (iii), and renumbering the remaining Parts
accordingly:
(ii) that the rate of interest to be paid by the City of Toronto on assessment appeal
refunds relating to the 1998 tax year and onward, from one month from the date the
Notice of Decision from the Assessment Review Board is received by the City, to the
date of refund, be set at the average rate paid by the six major Canadian chartered
banks on one-year GICs as determined by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
from time to time;
(iii) that the Province of Ontario be requested to pay interest on assessment appeal
refunds from 1998 and onward, from the date of overpayment to the date of the
Notice of Decision from the Assessment Review Board, and that the rate of interest
to be paid at the same rate of interest set by the City;"
so that the clause will read:
(i) the interest on assessment appeal refunds for 1997 and prior tax years be calculated
based on the policies and rates that existed in each of the former area municipalities
at that time;
(ii) that the rate of interest to be paid by the City of Toronto on assessment appeal
refunds relating to the 1998 tax year and onward, from one month from the date the
Notice of decision from the Assessment Review Board is received by the City, to the
date of refund, be set at the average rate paid by the six major Canadian chartered
banks on one-year GICs as determined by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
from time to time;
(iii) that the Province of Ontario be requested to pay interest on assessment appeal
refunds from 1998 and onward, from the date of overpayment to the date of the
Notice of Decision from the Assessment Review board, and that the rate of interest
to be paid at the same rate of interest set by the City;"
(iv) that By-law No. 29097 of the former City of North York, which allows for the
payment of interest on assessment appeal refunds for properties in the former City
of North York, be amended to reflect the changes as set out in Recommendations
Nos. (2) and (3) above;
(v) that the former City of Toronto's Municipal Code be amended to provide that any overpayments made on, or after, January 1, 1998, which are eligible for assessment
appeal refunds, shall have the interest applied from the day the overpayment is made;
and
(vi) that the City Solicitor be authorized to submit the necessary by-law to give effect to
these recommendations.
Moved by Councillor Moscoe:
'That the Clause be amended by deleting Part (v) of Recommendation No. (213) of the
Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee the words "capital program and thereafter revert
to being transferred to the", so that such recommendation shall now read as follows:
"(v) effective January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000, the estimated tax supported
operating budget savings of $46.2 million due to the continued suspension of
the OMERS premium in 1999 and 2000 be applied to the Employee Benefit
Reserve."'
The original recommendation relating to OMERS as contained in the report "1999 Capital Financing
Plan - Tax Supported Program" was:
"(v) effective January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000, the estimated tax supported
operating budget savings of $46.2 million due to the continued suspension of the
OMERS premium in 1999 and 2000 be applied to the capital program and thereafter
revert to being transferred to the Employee Benefit Reserve."
Moved by Councillor Sgro:
"It is further recommended that, prior to final approval of any in-year changes to approved
or new initiatives, the recommendation be referred to the Chief Administrative Officer for
report thereon to the first subsequent meeting of the Policy and Finance Committee, and
Council, on the full cost and source of funds for such initiative."
Comments:
(1) Interest Paid on Assessment Appeal Refunds
The amendments as contained in the motion from Councillor Adams impact the amount of
interest the City would pay on assessment appeals as compared to the recommendations
contained in the report dated April 8, 1999 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
Both relate to assessment appeals from 1998 onward as the practices existing in the former
municipalities for tax years prior to 1998 are recommended for grandfathering. The major
difference for payment of interest is:
(a) April 8, 1999 report of the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer: interest is paid at
a rate of 1 percent (average rate of major banks savings account balances or 1 percent
minimum) from date of overpayment to date of refund, and that the Province be
requested to pay the interest due to the delay between the filing of the appeal until
its final disposition by the Assessment Review Board;
(b) Councillor Adams Motion: interest is paid at the average rate of 1-year GIC of major
banks (currently it is 3.5 percent) which is split between the Province paying interest
from the date of overpayment to the date the Notice of Decision is received by the
City; and, the City paying interest from one month after the Notice of Decision to
date of refund. The Province would have to be requested to pay their portion being
from the date of overpayment to the date of Notice of Decision being received by the
City. Under current legislation, the City has the authority to split the interest between
the Province and itself (as noted above) but staff are not aware of any other Ontario
municipality currently using this process.
The table below is from a sampling of 1998 appeals processed to date and illustrates the impact of
a $1,000.00 refund based on the two different scenarios for payment of interest as discussed above.
The Provincial share is based on the average delay from the date of overpayment to the date the
decision is received by the City (286 days) and the City share is based on the length of time from
receipt of the decision to date of refund. For the Adams motion, the City period is 93 days less a
30 day grace period for a total of 63 days. For the CFO's recommendation, the City's period is the
full 93 days.
Comparison of Interest on a $1,000 Refund: Adams Motion and CFO Recommendation
|
|
3.5% (Adams)
|
1% (CFO)
|
Difference
|
Province Cost |
$27.42 |
$7.84 |
$19.58 |
City Cost |
$6.04 |
$10.39 |
($4.35) |
Total Interest
Received by
Taxpayer |
$33.46* |
$10.39** |
$23.07 |
Notes:
* If Province agrees to pay interest.
** Total interest paid by City even if Province refuses to reimburse City.
Based on a sampling of 1998 appeals processed to date, in general, there is a longer time lag for the
decision to be received from the Province than for the City to provide a refund. The table shows that
the interest cost to the City under the Adams motion for each $1,000.00 of refund would be $6.04
and the Provincial share of $27.42 would not be provided unless the Province agrees to share the
cost. Under the Chief Financial Officer's recommendation, the cost to the City is $10.39 which
represents the total cost. The City would pay the entire interest but would request the Province to pay
its share. The difference is that under the Adams motion, the taxpayer would only receive the $6.04
unless the Province agrees to share whereas under the Chief Financial Officer recommendation, the
taxpayer would receive the full amount of $10.39 even if the province refuses to share the cost.
Under both scenarios, 82 percent of the total interest as calculated, relates to the Provincial share but
as stated, under the Chief Financial Officer recommendation, the City would still pay the full amount
and then request reimbursement from the Province. The Province may be reluctant to agree given
the precedent across the Province it might set.
To ensure that taxpayers do receive interest from the date of overpayment to refund, the
recommendations in the April 8, 1999, report should be adopted. Those recommendations, although
paying interest at 1 percent, would ensure interest is paid for the entire period of overpayment to
refund. If the Province does not agree to pay the interest for its portion, the City would still pay
interest at the 1 percent rate. Under the Adams motion, taxpayers would only receive the full interest
if the Province agrees to pay as the City would not pay interest for the Provincial portion. For the
City to pay interest for the full period at 3.5 percent rate, the costs increase significantly as outlined
in the report dated April 8, 1999 which showed the cost of paying interest at 3.5 percent from the
date of overpayment to refund at $12.85 million or $9.25 million over the 1999 budgeted amount.
If Councillor Adams motion is adopted, a technical amendment to Recommendation (v) regarding
to the former City of Toronto Municipal Code would be required to change the period that interest
would be applied. It would change so that interest would be paid from the date the Notice of
Decision is received by the City to the date of refund and not from the date of the overpayment.
Whichever option is adopted, it is recommended that instead of including a reference to a rate set
by the six Canadian chartered banks, any recommendation should refer to the eight banks as listed
on Schedule 1 of the Bank Act. The banks listed include: Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia,
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Canadian Western Bank, Laurentian Bank, National Bank
of Canada, Royal Bank of Canada and the Toronto-Dominion Bank.
(2) Year 1999 and 2000 OMERS Surplus
The amended clause, contained in the motion of Councillor Moscoe, is recommending that
the contribution of the OMERS savings to the Employee Benefits Reserve Fund continue in
1999 and 2000 instead of waiting to 2001 as contained in the recommendation as adopted
by Council. In discussions with credit rating agencies, it was determined that they would be
impartial to either option since the reserve fund contribution would increase the City's assets
by the same amount that offsetting debenture requirements would decrease its long-term
liabilities. It was emphasized that as long as the OMERS surplus is applied in either manner,
as opposed to using the funds to finance operating budget expenditures, the City's financial
position would be strengthened. While the report which will provide a current actuarial
valuation of the City's unfunded employee liabilities is not yet available, we have received
preliminary indications that these amounts will be significant and will require a long-term
funding strategy. However, if the projected amount of $46.2 million is allocated to the
Employee Benefit Reserve Fund in 1999 and 2000 instead of offsetting the City's debt
requirements resulting from the capital budget, the operating budget will have to
accommodate an additional $1.3 million in debt charges in 1999, $7.8 million in 2000 and
$13.0 million each year from 2001 to 2009, given a 10 year term-to-maturity. While the
Employee Benefit Reserve Fund would generate additional interest earnings estimated at
$1.2 million during 1999, $3.5 million in 2000 and $4.6 million in 2001 and onwards, these
amounts would be retained in the Reserve Fund and would not be available to partially offset
the increased debt charges.
It is therefore recommended that the original recommendation stand. Our immediate
pressure is capital, particularly one-time expenditures such as transition projects, Y2K
reconversions and the purchase of subway cars.
(3) In-Year Capital Approvals
Following annual Council approval of the capital works program, there may be requests for
adjustments for new initiatives from time to time. The recommendation made by Councillor
Sgro would allow control over the borrowing impacts of in-year changes to the approved
capital works program, while allowing a degree of flexibility for necessary or justified
changes to the program. It is therefore recommended that, prior to consideration of any
in-year changes following Council approval of the capital works program for new or
expanded initiatives, such requests be referred to the Chief Administrative Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for report thereon to the Policy and Finance Committee
on the full cost and source of funds for such initiatives.
Conclusion:
With respect to interest on assessment refunds, it is recommended that the rate of interest be set at
the the average rate for savings accounts of the banks as listed on Schedule 1 of the Bank Act and
it be paid from the date of overpayment to the date of refund. The recommendation of the Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer ensures that interest is paid from the date of overpayment to the date
of refund. The Province would be requested to pay its share as outlined in the proposal, but even if
it refuses, the full interest would be paid to the taxpayer. Under the Adams motion, taxpayers would
only receive the full interest if the Province agrees to pay as the City would not pay interest for the
Provincial portion. For the City to pay interest for the full period at 3.5 percent rate, the costs
increase significantly.
The recommendations as contained in Recommendation 214 of Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee Report No. 8, Clause 1 (April 26 and 27, 1999), regarding payment of interest on
assessment appeal refunds, should be adopted unless it is clear that the Province will pay for its share
of interest as outlined in this report.
If the recommendation contained in the 1999 Capital Financing Plan-Tax Supported Program
pertaining to the use of the estimated OMERS surplus is modified to accelerate the contribution to
the Employee Benefit Reserve Fund to 1999 from 2001 instead of being used to offset debt issuance
requirements, there will be an increase in debt charges as contained in the operating budget of
approximately $1.3 million in 1999, $7.8 million in 2000 and $13.0 million each year from 2001 to
2009 inclusive.
The recommended process for the Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer to review in-year capital funding requests will improve the City's financial controls.
Contact Names:
Paul Wealleans, Manager, Tax Policy, Appeals and Assessment 397-4208
Martin Willschick, Manager, Treasury 392-8072
Len Brittain, Director, Treasury and Financial Services 392-5380
23
Big City Mayors Caucus of the FCM - April 29, 1999
Saskatoon Meeting Report
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, received this Clause.
Council also adopted the following recommendations:
"It is recommended that:
(1) a copy of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' documents dated June 1999,
entitled 'National Housing Policy Options Paper - A Call for Action' and 'Draft
National Housing Policy Options Paper - A Call for Action - Municipal Profiles',
respectively, submitted by Councillor Jack Layton, be forwarded to the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services for circulation to
individuals and organizations deemed appropriate, with a request that such
organizations consider endorsing the Policy Options Papers and convey their
support to the Federal government;
(2) City Council express its appreciation to Councillor Jack Layton for his leadership
in placing the issue of homelessness on the national agenda, through the discussions
at the Big City Mayors Caucus of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities; and
(3) Council also extend its thanks to Mayor Mel Lastman for speaking on behalf of
Council on this matter.")
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of Recommendation
No. (1) embodied in the report (May 1, 1999) from Councillor Jack Layton, Don River.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports, for the information of Council, having
referred:
(i) Recommendation No. (2) embodied in the report (May 1, 1999) from Councillor Jack
Layton, Don River, to the Chief Administrative Officer, the Commissioner of Community
and Neighbourhood Services and the Toronto Police Services Board; and
(ii) Recommendation No. (3) embodied in the aforementioned report, to the City Solicitor,
for report thereon to the Policy and Finance Committee.
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following report (May 1, 1999)
from Councillor Jack Layton, Don River, Ward 25:
First, Mayor Lastman, thank you for the opportunity to represent you once again at the Big City
Mayors Caucus. The Caucus has steadily responded to your leadership and our City's pro-active
stance on homelessness over the past year. Community groups across the country have also been
instrumental in developing the momentum of public concern. As a result, homelessness has hit the
radar screen of national decision-makers and media.
I have recorded a few of the highlights of the meeting. Full documentation is available through my
office. Please contact Monica Tang at 392-4058 for copies of any item. Some recommendations
are also included.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) that the Council Strategy Committee for People Without Homes consider the Saskatoon
SHIP initiative and that the Chair convene a meeting with key stakeholders to investigate the
feasibility of implementing such a programme in Toronto;
(2) that the City of Toronto endorse, in principle, the introduction of a new by-law to make it an
offense to possess a knife of other similar weapon in a public place, street, park or public
transit, without a reasonable excuse. This offence would be punishable by a fine; and
(3) the City Solicitor bring forward a by-law, modeled on the Montreal / Mount Royal / Lachine
By-Law, for consideration by the appropriate Committees of Council.
Homelessness and Housing:
I presented the results of our National Symposium on Homelessness and the draft National Housing
Policy Options Paper. As well, I turned over the first $20,000.00 installment of Toronto's
$60,000.00 contribution to the Big City Mayors' Homelessness and Housing Initiative.
There was unanimous support for our proposals, for the draft National Housing Policy Document
written by the group which Toronto has chaired. The policy will now go forward to the Halifax
FCM meetings.
Here were some of the responses and comments:
Saskatoon's SHIP (Social Housing Initiatives Programme) is an exciting partnership initiative to
generate financing for low income housing. The Board of Trade, Homebuilders, banks, labour are
all involved with the city in recruiting and mobilizing capital.
Recommendation 1: That the Council Strategy Committee for People Without Homes consider the
Saskatoon SHIP initiative and that the Chair convene a meeting with key stakeholders to investigate
the feasibility of implementing such a programme in Toronto.
Calgary indicated that it had approved the $0.03 contribution ($25,000.00) to the initiative. Other
Mayors indicated that they would be approaching their Councils for similar support.
The Big City Mayors' Caucus then adopted the following motions which were submitted by Toronto:
(a) the document be presented for endorsement at the FCM Annual Conference in Halifax;
(b) the FCM Executive Committee be requested to assign a high priority to and work on the
implementation of the FCM Big City Mayors Caucus Initiative on Housing and
Homelessness;
(c) the Homelessness Initiative include the development of a broad coalition of national
organizations in support of the campaign for affordable housing;
(d) the Initiative include a comprehensive approach to develop support in Cabinet, Parliament,
the bureaucracy, the media and the public at large; and
(e) the Initiative be funded through a one time voluntary contribution by participating cities of
$ 0.03 / capita to a fund to be administered by the FCM and the National Housing Policy
Options Team.
Port Authorities:
Mayor Bob Morrow of Hamilton and I both presented the terrible situation our cities face in dealing
with the Federal government on these matters. A detailed Memo on the Canada Port Authorities
process was provided (and is available in my office). To quote the FCM Memo: "It is apparent that
the Minister of Transport and his officials have failed to honour the commitments made to FCM on
behalf of the affected municipal governments."
The FCM adopted the following motion: "That an urgent letter be forwarded to the Minister of
Transport in which the Big City mayors Caucus urge the Minister of Transport to honour previous
commitments made with respect to the Harbour Commissions at Toronto, Hamilton and Windsor."
Carrying Knives as Concealed Weapons:
The City of London brought forward a proposal to amend the Criminal Code to require mandatory
minimum incarceration for the use of a weapon such as a knife.
Mayor Glen Murray commented that young people involved in crime are becoming accustomed to
seeing time in jail as a part of the cycle of their life. Ten percent of the young people are the ones
we are discussing here. We are creating a physical environment in which a community of young
people is created which has fewer and fewer supports, recreational activities, interventions in family
abuse situations and basic needs provision. We must take action on these fronts if we are to impact
on youth crime.
Other Mayors expressed doubts about the deterence effect on the 5 percent of the young people who
get involved in these sorts of activities.
Montreal, Lachine and Mount Royal have introduced successfully a municipal by-law making it an
offense to possess a knife of other similar weapon in a public place, street, park or public transit,
without a reasonable excuse. This offence is punishable by a fine. The City of Montreal by-law was
challenged in Quebec Superior Court and was upheld and the regulation was not deemed to infringe
on the Federal government's criminal jurisdiction.
I believe that this by-law has the effect of 'nipping in the bud' the problem of knifes being carried
in our community.
This matter will be considered by the FCM Standing Committee on Community Safety and Crime
Prevention. The Big City Mayors urged that the emphasis on community development strategies
to promote safety and reduce crime while, at the same time, endorsing the change to the criminal
code.
Recommendation 2: That the City of Toronto endorse, in principle, the introduction of a new by-law
to make it an offense to possess a knife of other similar weapon in a public place, street, park or
public transit, without a reasonable excuse. This offence would be punishable by a fine.
Recommendation 3: The City Solicitor bring forward a by-law, modeled on the Montreal / Mount
Royal / Lachine By-Law, for consideration by the appropriate Committees of Council.
Theft:
In another innovative approach, the City of Surrey, has adopted a programme to reduce car theft by
young people. Rather than put young people who steal cars into jail, Surrey established a different
penalty: a five year prohibition on holding a driver's license. The results have been very positive.
I have requested the Mayor of Surrey, Doug McCallum, to provide background material for our
Council.
Given that ten times as many bicyles are stolen as cars and given that less than 10% of stolen
bicycles are returned, compared to in excess of 90 percent return rates for stolen cars. I believe that
a similar penalty should be adopted for all vehicles.
(4) That the City Solicitor and the Police Services Board report on the proposal to establish new
penalties for vehicle theft which would be based upon the Surrey model wherein convicted
car thieves have their driver's licenses taken away for 5 years. In the case of young
offenders, the prohibition would prevent the offender from receiving his or her driver's
license for 5 years on becoming of age.
Millenium Budget:
FCM is developing a comprehensive Millenium budget project which includes Toronto's priorities
front and centre. It will have a strong environmental emphasis, and an emphasis on homelessness
and housing initiatives.
The recommendations adopted by the Caucus included the following commitments:
(a) to commit to the campaign for a new municipal infrastructure programme with
environmental benefits in the Millenium Budget. The 2000 municipal infrastructure
programme should be sufficiently flexible to accommodate equally the needs of both rural
and small communities and focus on the following:
(i) waste management systems;
(ii) water treatment, storm runoff and sewage systems;
(iii) alternative energy sources, energy efficiency;
(iv) sustainable transportation, including public transit, rail and advanced technologies,
vehicle emissions testing, cycling and walking infrastructure, roads and bridges; and
(v) mainstreet renewal.
(b) commit to the campaign for a National Highwys Programme to address national highways
system improvements; and
(c) commit to Strategic Infrastructure Investments (SII) to create new areas of economic activity
funded as a component of each of the first two programmes.
Sustainable Urban Transportation:
Despite the excellent arguments which FCM Members have been advancing for gas tax funding of
public transit, Mayors reported that the Federal government is still adopting the stance that urban
transportation is a Provincial jurisdiction.
The Big City Mayors endorsed the ongoing campaign to secure a portion of the gas tax for the
purposes of funding public transit.
Additional Notes:
Montreal, Vancouver and, recently, Winnipeg, have moved to create new governance models for
transportation management in their regions. Each of these regions has created a transportation
utility. These agencies have established comprehensive business plans.
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing
Clause, the following reports from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities submitted by
Councillor Layton:
(i) (June 1999) National Housing Policy Options Paper - A Call for Action; and
(ii) (June 1999) (Draft) National Housing Policy Options Paper - A Call for Action Municipal
Profiles.)
24
Greater Toronto Services Board
1999 Budget and Business Plan
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the following
Recommendations of the Greater Toronto Services Board, embodied in the following
communication (May 10, 1999) from the Executive Director, Greater Toronto Services Board:
"(1) ( ii) recommended expenditure for the annual external audit be
eliminated, and the budget accordingly reduced by $5,000; and
(3) the annual external Audit responsibility be conducted each year, at no
cost to the Board, by the external auditor for the Regions of Durham,
Halton, Peel and York, and the City of Toronto on a rotating basis,
commencing with the City of Toronto for the 1999 Budget and the
Region of Peel for the 2000 Budget."
The Greater Toronto Services Board adopted as amended the "Greater Toronto Services Board 1999
Budget and Business Plan" at its meeting of May 7, 1999. The Board also had before it a report,
dated May 5, 1999, from the joint meeting of the Interim Budget Advisory Working Group and the
Interim Personnel Working Group which was adopted without amendment. These reports are
attached for your information.
May I bring to your attention recommendations 1.ii) and 3. in the report dated May 5, 1999, from the
joint meeting of the Interim Budget Advisory Working Group and the Interim Personnel Working
Group which recommends that:
"1.ii) recommended expenditure for the annual external audit be eliminated, and the budget
accordingly reduced by $5,000; and
3. the annual external Audit responsibility be conducted each year, at no cost to the
Board, by the external auditor for the Regions of Durham, Halton, Peel and York,
and the City of Toronto on a rotating basis, commencing with the City of Toronto for
the 1999 Budget and the Region of Peel for the 2000 Budget".
I would ask that you provide us with whatever approvals are necessary to implement this
recommendation.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
(The reports referred to in the foregoing communication, respecting the Greater Toronto Services
Board 1999 Budget and Business Plan and the May 5, 1999, report from the joint meeting of the
Interim Budget Advisory Working Group, were forwarded to all Members of Council with the
June 1, 1999, agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and copies thereof are also
on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
25
Year 2000 Priority One Business Functions
Status Report May 1999
(City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having concurred with the
recommendations embodied in the following report (May 25, 1999) from the Commissioner
of Corporate Services:
Purpose:
The Year 2000 Business Continuity Plan Status Report (April 1999) outlines the following
information as requested by Council at its November 1998 meeting:
(i) Status report of each priority 1Year 2000 function;
(ii) Status report on the ABC's and their state of readiness;
(iii) Status report on expenditures for priority 1 Year 2000 functions; and
(iv) Change requests.
Funding Sources:
No funding is required at this time.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) this report be received for information; and
(2) the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee refer this report to Council for its information.
Comments:
Milestone Update:
The Remediation phase was completed for most priority 1 business functions on or before April 30,
1999. We have now moved into the testing and implementation phase, the strategy being to have
most projects implemented by Sept 30, 1999. The Project Office has been meeting regularly with
other external partners to share experiences and provide feedback.
Communications:
On May 25, the City of Toronto and other essential service providers presented our readiness status
to the Building Owners and Management Association (BOMA).
Briefings will be held in June for Councillors to provide an update on the City's readiness status.
Also participating will be Toronto Hydro, TTC, Toronto District Heating Corporation, and the
Toronto Police.
Enbridge Consumers' Gas will be providing a presentation for the City of Toronto Councillors and
staff on June 3, 1999.
In early June the City of Toronto will be distributing a Year 2000 Household brochure to all
households and businesses in the City of Toronto. This is one of the many initiatives being
undertaken by the City of Toronto to inform and educate the public on the year 2000 issue and the
City's readiness program and how to access information with regard to year 2000 questions.
The Year 2000 Community Liaison office has been meeting with numerous voluntary and
community organizations to:
(a) assess their level of confidence and information needs as it relates to their role in maintaining
the public's confidence regarding the delivery of service;
(b) create an understanding of the City's Year 2000 readiness efforts;
(c) identify the needs and concerns that organizations have regarding their community and client
needs; and
(d) identify ways to work with voluntary and community organizations in order to ensure that
the public has:
(i) confidence in planning for essential services and support; and
(ii) the information required to make informed personal choices.
Status report on Priority One business functions:
Currently 12 of the business functions in the operating departments have completed year 2000 testing
and are now being implemented to production (see Attachment 1). There has been significant
progress by the Works and Emergency Department on their priority 1 business functions. As a
result, the Steering Committee has approved a number of priority 2 and 3 initiatives for this
Department. Progress on these initiatives will be reported in future Strategic Policies and Priorities
Committee reports.
Desktop Project:
Of the City's desktops, 4345 units have been remediated. This includes 2500 desktops remediated
by the Province. 10,155 remain to be upgraded or replaced. All major city sites, with the exception
of the North York Civic Center are in the 20-day pre-implementation cycle. North York will be
implemented in mid-May due to a dependency on a network conversion.
Server Rollout:
The 1100 mid-range servers supporting critical business functions will be
consolidated/replaced/upgraded. These servers will be centrally located at the 703 Don Mills
location. As a result of consolidation of platforms, 600 servers will be retired. To date, 53 units
have been rolled out, primarily in support of testing.
Mainframes:
The former Etobicoke and Scarborough UNISYS environments have been consolidated on the
former Scarborough platform and the former Etobicoke platform has been decommissioned. The
former North York environment will also be decommissioned once the applications have been
upgraded remediated and migrated to the EDS MVS mainframe environment.
All Mainframe codes have to be remediated, regardless of the application priority, as the platform
and product upgrades required to make the mainframe environment year 2000 ready necessitate this.
The initial City assessment had identified 8 million lines of code in the production libraries. An
additional 4 million lines of production code have since been identified in departmental libraries.
In total there are 231 mainframe applications.
As a result of the detailed assessment, 7.5 million lines of code will be retired, 3 million lines will
be converted and tested, and 1 million lines of code were assessed to be ready and therefore only
require testing. Of the 3 million lines of code requiring conversion, almost 2 million have been
converted to date. This represents the majority of the priority 1 mainframe systems. These
applications are currently being tested in the year 2000 test environment established at EDS for the
City applications.
Networks:
The equipment in the core data network, which connects the major City locations, will be made year
2000 ready by May 30, 1999. The equipment at the remaining peripheral locations will be
remediated by July 31, 1999. The upgrades required to the Network Management System, which
enables the City to manage its network infrastructure, will be implemented by September 15, 1999.
The physical inventory of the City's voice network has been complete as of April 29, 1999. The
team is in the process of obtaining a statement of readiness from vendor/service providers for all
compliant or non-compliant products. Non-compliant equipment will be replaced or remediated by
August 1999.
External Partners and Agreements:
It is necessary for the readiness of all City suppliers and their products to be assured and, likewise,
for all organizations receiving City services to be assured that these services will not be interrupted.
Of the 2,000 priority 1 supplier contracts, 1,248 have been retired or consolidated leaving 752 for
renegotiations. Of these, 488 have been contacted, with a total of 106 responses to date.
Fleet:
This project addresses concerns regarding vehicles owned or leased by the City of Toronto, and
utilized by the Police, Fire, and Ambulance services, as well as salt/sand and snow plow vehicles.
Manufacturers have been contacted for the identification of vehicles requiring remediation. Although
the likelihood of vehicles failing to operate is low, and despite the relatively minor risk, contact has
been made with other municipalities (including New York City), and the province to exchange
vehicle information.
Facilities:
Manufacturers have been contacted for the identification of systems requiring remediation, and
changes will be performed where required. Corporate Facilities will play a supervisory role for all
facilities, and the City will contract services to verify and validate the existing inventory. All
information available to date will be provided to each department for review, feedback and
confirmation.
The amount of testing required versus the initial forecast has increased due to a more comprehensive
test procedure being required by quality assurance than originally envisaged. It should be noted that
all priority 1 systems will be sample tested regardless of the manufacturer's response.
Essential Services:
Water Supply:
The date roll-back solution for the Pumping Control computer at Central Pumping and the Control
computer at the Harris Filtration Plant were successfully implemented in April and are now going
through the certification process.
Ambulance:
The Ambulance Emergency Medical Services Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system successfully
completed its Y2K compliance tests in April.
Traffic Lights:
1703 of the 1834 traffic lights have been fixed.
Status report on TTC, May 2, 1999:
Background:
Project plans to remediate the TTC's business applications, technology infrastructure and embedded
systems are in place, and detailed plans have been integrated into a master plan. Integrated databases
have been built to track the inventory of applications to be remediated, embedded systems, as well
as the technical infrastructure.
Current remediation efforts for critical applications and embedded systems are expected to be
completed by September 1999. Exceptions to this include a small number of replacement business
applications, such as Scheduling, Timeline, and Engineering Document Control. Individual project
plans are being tracked closely, and no critical delays are expected.
Contingency and continuity planning is well under way, to accommodate both IT application failures
and external problems related to power supply, communications, and water which will significantly
impact service. A Contingency Task Force has been established within TTC with senior
representation from each Branch.
A Communications Strategy has been developed, and an Internet site to disseminate Y2K
information to TTC employees has been completed.
Progress:
Details on progress by group, project, and project phase are represented in the TTC's Y2K Progress
Chart attached (Attachment 2). The chart represents the seven major phases of the Year 2000
project: Initiation, Inventory, Assessment, Remediation or Replacement, Testing, Implementation,
and Post Implementation. The Y2K Compliant Date represents the forecast Implementation or
Production completion date. The percent complete is based on the amount of work accomplished.
A number of critical IT applications have recently been certified and put into production. These
include the Metropass Discount Plan, the Ticket Order Processing System, Payroll (Level 1
applications) and the Delay Logs application, which monitors service delays. Wheel Trans has been
Y2K certified, and is in the process of being implemented. As of the end of April 1999, 56 percent
of the Commission's 153 Level 1 and2 Systems are completing remediation, 31 percent are actively
being tested for Y2K compliance, and the remaining 13 percent have been Y2K certified. By the end
of May, the number of certified systems will double to 26 percent, with all of the most critical IT
applications Y2K ready by September 30, 1999.
For the Commission's 200+ embedded systems, 41 percent of the embedded components have been
certified Y2K ready. Another 23 percent have successfully passed Y2K testing, and are awaiting
signoff documentation. 30 percent of the embedded systems are undergoing additional type testing,
and the remaining 5 percent are being replaced with new, Y2K compliant systems. The T-1 Subway
cars, and all of the Commission's voice systems have recently been certified Y2K compliant. The
embedded systems are on target to be fully compliant by May 31, 1999.
Budget:
The current projected cost for the Y2K project is $17.8M. This does not include the costs for
permanent IT employees working on Y2K (which is most of the department) nor the costs of the
User Testers and User Coordinators from all Branches participating in the test planning, testing, and
contingency planning efforts. This amount is $2.8M over the approved budget, and the Y2K Project
Office is currently investigating options to make up the shortfall internally.
Status report on the City of Toronto's expenditures:
Attached is a status report on the $149.6 million allocated to the Y2K project to remedy all Priority 1
business functions. As of April 30, 1999, a total of $32.4 million has been committed or spent. For
April 1999, $8.5 million has been committed. The majority of this expenditure is again for
resources, hardware, software, servers, and network equipment. See Attachment 3.
Change requests:
Corporate Services:
25 Oracle licenses for use with SPAN:
Corporate Services requested $18,400.00 for the acquisition of 25 Oracle database licenses, as they
were not included in the original business case. Oracle is the database tool that holds the data for
SPAN. The licenses are required for staff, throughout the City, who will use SPAN to perform their
jobs. This was approved by the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Human Resources processes:
The Human Resources Division requested funds in the amount of $88,115.00 for HR Processes
business case 42. This is for establishment control, salary administration, grievance tracking,
employment equity, position management, job evaluation and performance development. No
funding was requested in the original business case. This was approved by the Y2K Steering
Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Integrated Disability and Case Management:
The Human Resources Division requested additional funds in the amount of $28,890.00 for the
Integrated Disability and Case Management system, since renamed as the Integrated Disability and
Safety Management System (IDSM). The inclusion of the proposed case management module will
address the gaps identified in a way which allows the multiple users of the system, from supervisors
to claims managers and health consultants, to access and input information without compromising
confidentiality. A separate module will also allow users access to multiple screens at the same time.
The inclusion of the RTW and TAP component in the IDSM system is vital because outcome screens
drive the subsequent IDM action. Ready access and exchange of this information by multiple users
at multiple locations is also critical to prevent delays in the return to work process. In addition, the
RTW form is legislated, and needs to form part of the claim file. The inclusion of the RTW and
TAP components will be able to capture data necessary for tracking placements, and providing
reports and comprehensive statistics to departments, unions, finance and WSIB. The TAP form
provides information necessary to ensure appropriate and accurate payment of workers on modified
work. This was approved by the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
ORACLE DBMS License to Support Y2K Remediation for Document Management:
To remedy the document management application to be Y2K compliant, the purchase of the
ORACLE database management system was required, at a cost of $192,594.65. Currently, the
Document Management Application uses a Btrieve database management system that is not Y2K
compliant. In addition, the Document Management Vendor no longer supports a Btrieve DBMS
platform. The Vendor does support SQLServer, Sybase and ORACLE platforms. The City of
Toronto's corporate standard is ORACLE. This was approved by the Y2K Steering Committee at
its May 6, meeting.
Economic Development, Culture and Tourism:
Change in Scope of Initiatives and Management Budget
Economic Development submitted a request for $80,000.00 for resources to address the actual scope
of the Contact Management Business Case. The original Business Case was estimated at $5,000.00
to test the Goldmine Software. This did not include adequate resources to address project
management, reporting and quality assurance for this business function. This was approved by the
Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Works and Emergency Services:
Increase of cost and change in completion date for Support Services Business Case:
When the original business case was written and submitted for approval, 1 client server and
3 mainframe subsystems were to be remediated and tested. It has since been decided that these
systems be migrated to a Y2K compliant system and this will require additional funding of
$75,843.00 for data conversion and migration effort and $45,000.00 for hardware upgrades. The
new targeted completion date is September 30, 1999. Funding in the amount of $120,843.00 was
required to meet these needs. This was approved by the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6,
meeting.
Funds requested in advance for Business Case 77 (Engineering Design and Construction) (CR73):
Upgrades of hardware and software for Y2K certification are required to the Survey and Mapping
area within Technical Services and funding of $466,400.00 is needed for this. This was approved
by the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Funds requested in advance for Business Case 77 (Engineering Design and Construction) (CR74):
Immediate funding of $447,500.00 is required for Y2K testing and certification of some of the more
critical systems in this priority 2 business function. This includes systems/application such as
HVCN Maintenance and librarian, Tender preparation VMCMS, HAL, invoice tracking system,
job/time tracking, progress certification management, project management Access 97, property
records/development, property records and VAL. This was approved by the Y2K Steering
Committee at its May 6, meeting.
105 - Funds requested in advance for Business Case 75, #2,3 and 4s:
Immediate funding of $229,094.38 is required for Y2K testing and certification of some of the more
critical systems in this priority 2 business function for Solid Water Management. These include the
following: purchasing requisition system, bidding system, Multi residential collection information,
Dump tracking system, Building information and apartment recycling system, Mapper-record
keeping, Mapping/routing system, and gas collection system. This was approved by the Y2K
Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Finance:
Replacement of monitors used by the Parking Tag Entry System:
The Parking Tags Entry System of the Parking Tags Operation uses 19" monitors in processing data
marked on parking tags. These monitors which are not Y2K ready were manufactured by
Cornerstone and are no longer supported by the vendor. There are 57 monitors, 39 of them are
19 inches and the rest are 17 inches. In order to continue the parking tags operations beyond the year
2000, it is necessary to replace these 57 monitors. The cost of replacement of these monitors is
$49,000.00 including taxes. This was approved by the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6,
meeting.
Cost Change on the NCR Scanner Y2K ready upgrade for the Parking Tag System:
The NCR 7780 Scanner used in the Parking Tags Operation is not year 2000 ready. In September
1998 the vendor informed the department that only the scanner, not the software, needed to be
upgraded. The cost was estimated at $4,500.00 and was included in the budget of the Business Case.
The vendor has since indicated that the software requires upgrading. The software upgrade has
increased the cost to $50,759.00, taxes included - a variance of $46,259.00. This was approved by
the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Replace original business case with new one:
The year 2000 solution, implementing the SAP R3 Finance System replacing all existing budget
systems in April, 1999, provided in the original business case for the Capital Budget Preparation is
no longer valid. Hence, this request is to replace the original business case with a new one.
In the original business case, the only cost incurred was the 5-days' work for testing the Clipper
program files with an estimate of $3,275.00. Under the new business case, the North York Capital
System will require analysis, design changes and modifications to add the necessary functionality
for the upcoming budget cycle, adjusting the cost to $177,372.00. It also needs to be tested for Year
2000 readiness. This was approved by the Y2K Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
CityWide Initiatives - Servers:
Require additional funding to support Public Library's server remediation:
To complete the Year 2000 mid-range server remediation for Public Library, an additional
$100,000.00 in funding is required. This will cover the gap between the Library's transition funding
and its Year 2000 mid-range server remediation requirements. This was approved by the Y2K
Steering Committee at its May 6, meeting.
CityWide Initiatives - Facilities Management:
Facilities:
There is a requirement to certify the inventory of building systems in City owned/leased facilities
using an external party. The test strategy requires accurate knowledge of the make and model of the
devices in a building. Without it, testing would have to be attempted on many more buildings. This
would impact the project end date negatively. This approach will require the inventory firm to sign
for approval of the inventory content. The expected completion date for the inventory completion
is July 31, 1999. Testing will be conducted in parallel using existing information. A collateral
benefit will be the accurate database of assets inventoried, which will be the property of the City.
The estimated cost to complete the inventory of the more than 1700 buildings including approval by
the external vendor is $976,000.00 plus taxes. This has been approved by the Y2K Steering
Committee at its May 6, meeting.
Conclusion:
The City of Toronto's Year 2000 readiness program is moving forward as anticipated. Council will
continue to receive progress reports as requested.
Contact:
Lana Viinamae, Director Year 2000.
(Attachments 1, 2 and 3, referred to in the foregoing report were forwarded to all Members of
Council with the June 1, 1999, agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and copies
thereof are also on file in the office of the City Clerk.)
Respectfully submitted,
MEL LASTMAN,
Chair
Toronto, June 1, 1999
(Report No. 10 of The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, including additions thereto, was
adopted, as amended, by City Council on June 9, 10 and 11, 1999.)
|