Decision Document |
|
Executive Committee |
Meeting No. | 37 (Special) | Contact | Patsy Morris, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 |
Phone | 416-392-9151 | |
Start Time |
12:30 PM |
exc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Committee Room 1, City Hall
|
Chair | Mayor David Miller |
The Decision Document is for preliminary reference purposes only. Please refer to the Committee’s Report to City Council or to the Minutes for the official record.
|
EX37.1 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
Election Administration By-laws - Updated Report (Bill 212) |
Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the dates and times for the 2010 election advance votes as follows:
a. If Bill 212 is not enacted by the Ontario Legislature:
i. Weekdays from Wednesday, October 20, 2010 to Friday, October 22, 2010 inclusive and Monday, October 25, 2010 to Wednesday, October 27, 2010, inclusive from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.;
ii. Saturday, October 30, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; and
iii. Sunday, October 31, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
b. If Bill 212 is enacted by the Ontario Legislature:
i. Weekdays from Tuesday, October 5, 2010 to Friday, October 8, 2010 inclusive and Tuesday, October 12, 2010 to Wednesday, October 13, 2010, inclusive from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.;
ii. Saturday, October 16, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; and
iii. Sunday, October 17, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
c. The City Solicitor be authorized to submit the appropriate bill once any amendments have been made to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 by Bill 212.
2. City Council authorize elector information to be made available during regular municipal elections and by-elections in those languages which the most recent available Statistics Canada data shows was spoken and understood in the home by at least 2 percent of a ward’s population, substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix ‘C’ to the report (November 16, 2009) from the City Clerk.
3. City Council direct that voting places shall open at 10:00 a.m. on voting day.
4. City Council direct that institutional voting places, as described in subsection 46(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, be open for the full voting day.
5. City Council request the City Clerk to ensure that the intended location of polling stations be made public at least six months prior to the election date and establish a process that would allow for revisions to be made in polling station locations that are shown to be problematic.
6. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction of any bills. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee requested the City Clerk to submit a report directly to the Special Meeting of City Council on December 2, 2009, on the feasibility and costs of providing transportation for the disabled to a neighbouring polling station if disabled accessibility cannot be achieved within a local voting area. |
Origin |
(November 16, 2009) Report from the City Clerk |
Summary |
It is recommended that Council enact by-laws establishing the dates and times for the advance votes and a formula to select the languages that certain election information will be available in. The advance votes dates and times by-law is a mandatory by-law that Council must pass. The language by-law is a permissive by-law. Copies of the proposed bills are set out in the appendices to this report.
The proposed amendments to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 contained in Bill 212 (Good Government Act, 2009) will, if enacted, change voting day from November 8, 2010 to October 25, 2010. As Council will not be meeting again prior to the opening of nominations on January 4, 2010, the Clerk is recommending two possible sets of dates for advance votes, dependent upon whether Bill 212 is enacted or not. This will permit staff to include the appropriate dates in the Candidate’s Guide whether or not Bill 212 is passed.
The City Clerk recommends that the by-law establishing a language formula be applicable to all regular municipal elections and by-elections in the City of Toronto, not just the 2010 election. The by-law establishing the dates and times of the advance votes will apply to the 2010 election only. |
Background Information |
Election Administration By-laws - Updated Staff Report (Bill 212) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25322.pdf) |
EX37.2 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
Election Campaign Finance By-laws – Updated Report (Bill 212) |
Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
Establishment of a Contribution Rebate Program
1. City Council implement a contribution rebate program for the 2010 election and:
a. pass a by-law substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix ‘A’ to the report (November 16, 2010) from the City Clerk;
b. increase funding from the non-program account to the Elections Reserve Fund XR1017 by $0.2 million to $0.8 million per annum beginning in 2010 to pay for the program;
c. direct that any election campaign surplus funds at the end of the campaign period, paid to the Clerk under the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 by a candidate for office on Toronto City Council, will become the property of the City of Toronto and be deposited into the Elections Reserve Fund XR1017 in accordance with section 14 of the draft bill attached as Appendix ‘A’ to this report.
Corporate and Trade Union Contributions
2. City Council pass a by-law to prohibit all corporate and trade union contributions to candidates seeking office to Toronto City Council in all regular municipal elections and by-elections, substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix ‘B’ to this report.
Electronic filing of Candidate Financial Statements
3. City Council pass a by-law to authorize the electronic filing of candidate financial statements in all regular municipal elections and by‑elections substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix ‘C’ to this report.
General
4. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction of the bills substantially in the form of Appendices ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’, to this report, adjusted as necessary if and when the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 is amended by Bill 212. |
Origin |
(November 16, 2009) Report from the City Clerk |
Summary |
Under the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, Council has the authority to pass by-laws to authorize a contribution rebate program, the prohibition of corporate and trade union contributions and the electronic filing of financial statements. These are all permissive by-laws. It is recommended that the by-laws prohibiting corporate and trade union contributions and the electronic filing of financial statements apply to all regular municipal elections and by-elections, not just the 2010 election. The contribution rebate by-law will apply only to the 2010 election.
Should Council decide to implement a rebate program for the 2010 election, it is recommended that the program parameters be the same as those for the 2006 election with the exceptions that all campaign surpluses required to be paid to the Clerk by a candidate for office on City Council will become the property of the City and the rebate application deadline will be extended to six months following the last supplementary reporting period.
If enacted, the proposed amendments to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 contained in Bill 212 (Good Government Act, 2009) will provide that a contributor cannot make contributions exceeding a total of $5,000 to two or more candidates for office on the same council and all campaign surpluses paid to the Clerk by candidates running for office on City Council will become the property of the City. |
Background Information |
Election Campaign Finance By-laws - Updated Report (Bill 212) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25316.pdf) A Comparison of Outstanding Requested Amendments to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, the Assessment Act and Ontario Regulation 101/97 against Bill 212 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25427.pdf) |
Communications |
(November 24, 2009) Presentation from Mr. Bill Freeman, Vote Toronto (EX.New.EX37.2.1) (November 24, 2009) Presentation from Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ward 34, Don Valley East (EX.New.EX37.2.2) (November 24, 2009) Submission from Director, Elections and Registry Services (EX.Main) |
EX37.3 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
Establishment of a Compliance Audit Committee for the 2010 Municipal Election – Updated Report (Bill 212) |
Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council establish a compliance audit committee composed of three members and delegate all of Council’s powers and functions under subsections 81(3), (4), (7), (10) and (11) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 in respect of compliance audit applications.
2. City Council adopt the terms of reference for the compliance audit committee set out in Appendix “C” in the report (November 16, 2009) from the City Clerk and direct the Clerk to make any amendments necessary to reflect enactment of the provisions of Bill 212 set out in Appendix “C” in the report.
3. City Council adopt the membership selection process set out in Appendix ‘D’ in the report.
4. City Council establish a per diem of $350 for attendance at meetings by Members of the Compliance Audit Committee.
5. City Council request the Province of Ontario to either:
a. amend the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 to permit a candidate to re-open his or her election campaign for a period of six months following the filing of a compliance audit application for the purpose of fund-raising to pay any costs associated with the compliance audit; or
b. amend the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to provide absolute certainty that Council can establish a policy to reimburse candidates and compliance audit applicants for the reasonable costs associated with a compliance audit proceeding on a case-by-case basis and to enable Council to make grants for this purpose.
6. If the Province of Ontario fails to make the necessary legislative amendments, City Council establish a policy to:
a. accept and review requests for reimbursement of legal expenses associated with compliance audit proceedings;
b. provide that the requests be reviewed by Council to determine if exceptional circumstances exist to warrant the reimbursement of the legal expenses; and
c. provide that reimbursements will be made to candidates only at the conclusion of the compliance audit proceedings and only if the candidate was vindicated.
7. City Council endorse the action taken by the Executive Committee, as the Provincial Standing Committee considering Bill 212 met prior to the City Council meeting, in having requested the City Clerk to:
a. Forward Recommendation 5 of the Executive Committee to the Chair of the Provincial Standing Committee considering Bill 212 and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; and urgently request that the deficiencies identified by Mayor Miller in his motion to the Committee be corrected forthwith.
b. Convey to the Province of Ontario the City's significant concern respecting the proposed Section 81(17) and Section 94(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, which leads to double jeopardy; and communicate this to the relevant Standing Committee, and request that Section 81(17) of the Municipal Elections Act be struck out and the current law continue to apply.
8. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto
|
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee, given that the Provincial Standing Committee considering Bill 212 is meeting prior to the City Council meeting on December 2, 2009, requested the City Clerk to:
a. Forward Recommendation 5 of the Executive Committee to the Chair of the Provincial Standing Committee considering Bill 212 and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; and urgently request that the deficiencies identified by Mayor Miller in his motion to the Committee be corrected forthwith.
b . Convey to the Province of Ontario the City's significant concern respecting the proposed Section 81(17) and Section 94(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, which leads to double jeopardy; and communicate this to the relevant Standing Committee, and request that Section 81(17) of the Municipal Elections Act be struck out and the current law continue to apply.
|
Origin |
(November 16, 2009) Report from the City Clerk |
Summary |
This report recommends the establishment of a compliance audit committee composed of three members for the 2010 municipal election.
Under the existing section 81 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, Council may choose to either consider compliance audit applications itself or establish a committee for this purpose. For both the 2003 and 2006 elections, Council established a compliance audit committee to consider applications for a compliance audit of candidate financial statements. All of Council’s powers and functions under section 81 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 were delegated to the committee. (A copy of section 81 of the Act is attached as Appendix ‘A’)
The proposed amendments to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 contained in Bill 212 (Good Government Act, 2009) make changes to section 81 and introduce a new section 81.1 to make a compliance audit committee mandatory for all municipalities and local boards if the Bill is passed in its current form. (A copy of the proposed sections is attached as Appendix ‘B’.)
A targeted search strategy will be undertaken to attract qualified individuals. A listing of recommended individuals will be submitted for Council’s consideration through the Executive Committee in early 2010. Each appointee to the compliance audit committee will receive the per diem established by Council for attendance at meetings (currently $350).
|
Background Information |
Establishment of a Compliance Audit Committee for the 2010 Municipal Election - Updated Report (Bill 212) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25317.pdf) |
EX37.4 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
2010 Election Community Engagement Program |
Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt a Community Engagement Program that improves the voters' list, engages eligible electors and that places a special focus on tenants, as specifically set out in the report (November 16, 2009) from the City Clerk.
2. City Council direct that the Community Engagement Program focus on the following:
a. Increasing the accuracy and currency of the voters’ list, particularly as it affects tenants.
b. Communicating the legislative changes introduced in Bill 212 (Good Government Act, 2009).
c. Engaging individuals and communities in the electoral process by broadening their understanding and commitment to participation in local democracy, improving accessibility, and offering opportunities to get involved.
3. City Council request the City Clerk to develop a door to door canvassing strategy, in accordance with the City's rights to develop a database under Section 22 of Bill 212, and report further to the Executive Committee at its February 1, 2010 meeting, including budget implications.
4. City Council request the City Clerk and other appropriate officials to contact Education institutions within the City of Toronto, including universities, community colleges, the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) and the Toronto Catholic School Board (TCSB), with the objective of their becoming more actively involved in the involvement and engagement of students in the 2010 Municipal Election, with a request that she submit a detailed implementation plan to the Executive Committee meeting on February 1, 2010, such report to include any financial requirements.
5. City Council request the City Clerk to submit a report to the February 1, 2010 meeting of the Executive Committee, on what additional sources of information will be used to improve the accuracy of the voters list, as provided for under new Section 22 of Bill 212. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee:
1. Requested the City Clerk to submit a report directly to City Council for its special meeting on December 2, 2009:
a. On what is the penalty for landlords who fail to comply with tenant notification along with the number of charges levied against landlords leading to the 2006 election.
b. On what tools are available to MPAC to ensure landlord compliance, and a plan to ensure these tools are used.
2. Requested the City Clerk to meet with the Chief Executive Officer of MPAC, and the Province's Chief Electoral Officer to request a commitment, in writing to:
a. Improve the voters lists for tenants and students. b. Provide for on-line voter registration. c. Provide reassurance that eligible voters will not be removed from the voters list.
and submit a report to the February 1, 2010, meeting of the Executive Committee on the outcome of these discussions.
3. Deferred consideration of the following motion by Councillor Moscoe until its meeting scheduled to be held on February 1, 2010.
Motion by Councillor Moscoe
"That the City of Toronto register a complaint with the Provincial Ombudsman on MPAC's failure to provide an accurate Municipal enumeration of tenants."
The City Clerk and the Director of Elections and Registry Services gave a presentation to the Executive Committee on the "2010 Election Community Engagement Program" and filed a copy of their presentation. |
Origin |
(November 16, 2009) Report from the City Clerk |
Summary |
This report provides an overview of the 2010 Election Community Engagement Program with an emphasis on improving the voters’ list, initiatives to engage eligible electors with special focus on tenants and the implications of Bill 212 (Good Government Act, 2009).
This initiative is being led by the City Clerk’s Office in partnership with many internal and external groups, stakeholders, and community organizations. In addition, the City Clerk’s Office is working jointly with Municipal Property and Assessment Corporation (MPAC) to ensure more tenants are included on the voters’ list.
|
Background Information |
2010 Election Community Engagement Program (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25318.pdf) A Comparison of Outstanding Requested Amendments to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, the Assessment Act and Ontario Regulation 101/97 against Bill 212 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25428.pdf) Presentation - 2010 Election Community Engagement Program (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25432.pdf) |
EX37.5 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
Adjustments to the 2010 Fall Schedule of Meetings Due to Revised Municipal Election Dates |
Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee submits to City Council, without recommendation, the report (November 18, 2009) from the City Clerk, entitled "Adjustments to the 2010 Fall Schedule of Meetings due to Revised Municipal Election Dates". |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee referred the adjusted 2010 Fall portion of the Schedule of Meetings contained in the report (November 18, 2009) from the City Clerk entitled "Adjustments to the 2010 Fall Schedule of Meetings due to Revised Municipal Election Dates", back to the City Clerk for report to be submitted directly to the Special Meeting of City Council on December 2, 2009, with respect to the meetings of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. |
Origin |
(November 18, 2009) Report from the City Clerk |
Summary |
The Province of Ontario has introduced Bill 212, "An Act to promote good government by amending or repealing certain Acts and by enacting two new Acts". If enacted, this legislation will move Nomination Day and Municipal Election Day ahead by two weeks. For 2010, this means that Nomination Day would be September 10, 2010 and the Municipal Election would be held on October 25, 2010.
This report recommends adjustments to the fall portion of the 2010 meeting schedule for Council and its Committees so that the last regular legislative cycle before the Municipal Election ends prior to the new Nomination Day |
Background Information |
Adjustments to the 2010 Fall Schedule of Meetings due to Revised Municipal Election Dates (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25319.pdf) Attachment 1 - Adjusted 2010 Fall Meeting Schedule (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-25320.pdf) |
Meeting Sessions |
Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
2009-11-24 | Afternoon | 12:35 PM | 4:50 PM | Public |
Attendance | ||
Members were present for some or all of the time period indicated. |
Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
2009-11-24 12:35 PM - 4:50 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Carroll, Davis, De Baeremaeker, Fletcher, Kelly, McConnell, Mihevc, Miller (Chair), Moscoe, Pantalone, Rae Not Present: Mammoliti Also present (non-members): Filion; Hall; Holyday; Jenkins; Minnan-Wong; Nunziata; Walker |
2009-11-24 12:35 PM - 4:50 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Carroll, Davis, De Baeremaeker, Fletcher, Kelly, McConnell, Mihevc, Miller (Chair), Moscoe, Pantalone, Rae Not Present: Mammoliti Also present (non-members): Filion; Hall; Holyday; Jenkins; Minnan-Wong; Nunziata; Walker |