![]() |
Decision Document |
|
North York Community Council |
Meeting No. | 28 | Contact | Francine Adamo, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Tuesday, October 13, 2009 |
Phone | 416-395-7348 | |
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
nycc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Council Chamber, North York Civic Centre
|
Chair | Councillor Maria Augimeri |
The Decision Document and Decision Summary are for preliminary reference purposes only. Please refer to the Committee’s Report to Council or the Minutes for the official record.
Action taken by the Community Council on items that are “delegated” (Community Council makes final decision) are so noted.
Declarations of Interest, if any, appear at the end of an item. |
NY28.1 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 9 |
Fence Exemption Request - 67 Cuffley Crescent North |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for an exemption from the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 – Fences, for 67 Cuffley Crescent North, on condition that when the fence is replaced it be constructed in compliance with Chapter 447 or its successor by-law. |
Origin |
(August 26, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
The subject matter is an application for an exemption to Chapter 447 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Fences, to maintain an existing fence in the front yard which is in violation of the By-law. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Fence Exemption Request - 67 Cuffley Cres. N. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23652.pdf) |
NY28.2 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Fence Exemption Request - 27 Alderbrook Drive |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for a fence exemption at 27 Alderbrook Drive. |
Origin |
(June 16, 2008) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
The purpose of this report is to consider a request by the owner(s) of 27 Alderbrook Drive, to be exempted from Chapter 447 – Fences, section 447-2(B). This section states that the maximum height of a fence in the rear yard is 2 metres.
The existing fencing in the side and rear yard is on the south side of the property and consists of different sections. The wood fence sections range in height up to 2.6 metres and extend for approximately 40.2 metres to the front face of the house/garage. The concrete wall which is erected beside the property line and serves as part of the pool enclosure, ranges in height up to 3.5 metres and is approximately 8.7 metres in length. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Fence Exemption - 27 Alderbrook Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23647.pdf) |
Communications |
(September 8, 2008) E-mail from Mark A. Marcello (NY.Main.NY27.2.1) (April 3, 2009) Letter from Les Rudnicki, Ontario Land Surveyor, Speight Van Nostrand & Gibson Limited (NY.Main.NY27.2.2) (October 9, 2009) E-mail from Patricia Foran, Aird & Berlis LLP, on behalf of the applicant (NY.New.NY28.2.3) |
2a | Fence Exemption Request - 27 Alderbrook Drive |
Origin |
(August 6, 2008) Report from Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official, North York District and District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has been delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-law.
The purpose of this report is to submit a follow-up report on item NY17.4 deferred at the North York Community Council meeting of July 7, 2008. |
Background Information |
Joint Staff Report - Fence Exemption Request - 27 Alderbrook Dr (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23648.pdf) |
NY28.3 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 34 |
Fence Exemption Request - 62 Larabee Crescent |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council deferred consideration of the report (January 12, 2009) from the District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District, to its next meeting on November 10, 2009. |
Origin |
(January 12, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an exemption to Chapter 447 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Fences, to maintain an existing fence in the front yard which is in violation of the By-law. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Fence Exemption - 62 Larabee Crescent (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23646.pdf) |
Communications |
(September 13, 2009) Petition from Romina Luga containing sixteen (16) signatures of area residents on Larabee Crescent (NY.Main.NY27.8.1) (September 14, 2009) E-mail from Romina Luga, submitting clearance documents from Bell, Enbridge, Rogers and Toronto-Hydro Electric System (NY.Main.NY27.8.2) |
NY28.4 | ACTION |
Received |
|
Ward: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34 |
Wrought Iron Fence in Front Yards |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council received the report (May 22, 2009) from the District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District, for information. |
Origin |
(May 22, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
The majority of wrought iron fence exemption applications in front yards since the enactment of Chapter 447 (Fences) have originated from properties in Ward 25. The regulation of fences based upon aesthetics or upon neighbourhood or area is not possible and regardless would not preclude exemption applications. Fence gates installed in front yard or exterior side yard fences can be regulated so as to restrict their opening into the City road allowance. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachment 1 - Wrought Iron Fence in Front Yards (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23645.pdf) |
NY28.5 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Encroachment Agreement Request - 23 Sunnydene Crescent |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for an encroachment agreement for 23 Sunnydene Crescent, subject to the following conditions:
a. that the owner enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards;
b. that the appropriate City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto;
c. that no claims will be made against the City by the owner for damages occurring to the area of the encroachment or its elements during snow removal;
d. the indemnification to the City by the owner of the encroachment for all liability relating in any way to the encroachment and providing of an insurance policy for such liability for the lifetime of the Agreement in a form as approved by the City Solicitor, in an amount no less than $2,000,000.00 or such greater amount as the City Solicitor may require;
e. that the life of the Agreement be limited to 10 years from the date of registration on title or to the date of removal of the encroachment at which time, the City may consider the Agreement for further extension, if requested by the applicant;
f. in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, Legal Services be authorized to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, subject to the approval of the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards; and
g. the owner pay all applicable fees. |
Origin |
(September 23, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a mater that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an encroachment agreement. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Encroachment Agreement Request - 23 Sunnydene Crescent (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23688.pdf) |
NY28.6 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Encroachment Agreement Request - 100 Gordon Road |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for an encroachment agreement for 100 Gordon Road, subject to the following conditions:
a. that the owner maintain the bushes/hedges/trees to the satisfaction of Transportation Services Division so that they do not obstruct the view of the speed limit sign on Seneca Street;
b. that the owner enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards;
c. that the appropriate City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto;
d. that no claims will be made against the City by the owner for damages occurring to the area of the encroachment or its elements during snow removal;
e. the indemnification to the City by the owner of the encroachment for all liability relating in any way to the encroachment and providing of an insurance policy for such liability for the lifetime of the Agreement in a form as approved by the City Solicitor, in an amount no less than $2,000,000.00 or such greater amount as the City Solicitor may require;
f. that the life of the Agreement be limited to 10 years from the date of registration on title or to the date of removal of the encroachment at which time, the City may consider the Agreement for further extension, if requested by the applicant;
g. in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, Legal Services be authorized to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, subject to the approval of the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards; and
h. the owner pay all applicable fees. |
Origin |
(September 23, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an encroachment agreement. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Encroachment Agreement Request - 100 Gordon Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23699.pdf) |
NY28.7 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Encroachment Agreement Request - 37 Brookfield Road |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for an encroachment agreement for 37 Brookfield Road, subject to the following conditions:
a. that the owner enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards;
b. that the appropriate City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto;
c. that no claims will be made against the City by the owner for damages occurring to the area of the encroachment or its elements during snow removal;
d. the indemnification to the City by the owner of the encroachment for all liability relating in any way to the encroachment and providing of an insurance policy for such liability for the lifetime of the Agreement in a form as approved by the City Solicitor, in an amount no less than $2,000,000.00 or such greater amount as the City Solicitor may require;
e. that the life of the Agreement be limited to 10 years from the date of registration on title or to the date of removal of the encroachment at which time, the City may consider the Agreement for further extension, if requested by the applicant;
f. in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, Legal Services be authorized to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, subject to the approval of the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards; and
g. the owner pay all applicable fees. |
Origin |
(September 23, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an encroachment agreement. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Encroachment Agreement Request - 37 Brookfield Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23701.pdf) |
NY28.8 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Encroachment Agreement Request - 15 Owen Boulevard |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for an encroachment agreement for 15 Owen Boulevard, subject to the following conditions:
a. that the owner ensure that all gates swing inwards to the satisfaction of the Transportation Services division;
b. that the owner enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards;
c. that the appropriate City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto;
d. that no claims will be made against the City by the owner for damages occurring to the area of the encroachment or its elements during snow removal;
e. the indemnification to the City by the owner of the encroachment for all liability relating in any way to the encroachment and providing of an insurance policy for such liability for the lifetime of the Agreement in a form as approved by the City Solicitor, in an amount no less than $2,000,000.00 or such greater amount as the City Solicitor may require;
f. that the life of the Agreement be limited to 10 years from the date of registration on title or to the date of removal of the encroachment at which time, the City may consider the Agreement for further extension, if requested by the applicant;
g. in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, Legal Services be authorized to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, subject to the approval of the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards; and
h. the owner pay all applicable fees. |
Origin |
(September 23, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an encroachment agreement. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Encroachment Agreement Request - 15 Owen Boulevard (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23702.pdf) |
NY28.9 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 23 |
Boulevard Marketing Request - 184 Parkview Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council deferred consideration of the report (September 23, 2009) from the District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District, to its next meeting on November 10, 2009. |
Origin |
(September 23, 2009) Report from District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for boulevard marketing. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Boulevard Marketing Request - 184 Parkview Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23695.pdf) |
NY28.10 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 16 |
Request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code – To permit a front yard parking pad at 441 Castlefield Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to permit a front yard parking pad at 441 Castlefield Avenue, subject to the owner paying all applicable fees. |
Origin |
(August 17, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the community council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To report on a request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to permit a front yard parking pad at 441 Castlefield Avenue which does not meet the requirements of the Code. As this is an appeal and a request for an exemption from the by-law, it is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Front Yard Parking - 441 Castlefield Ave. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23657.pdf) Attachment 1 - Front Yard Parking - 441 Castlefield Ave (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23658.pdf) |
NY28.11 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 16 |
Request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code – To permit a front yard parking pad at 109 Albertus Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to permit a front yard parking pad at 109 Albertus Avenue, subject to:
a. the owner complying with the front yard landscaping requirements, satisfactory to the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District; and
b. the owner paying all applicable fees. |
Origin |
(August 14, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter over which community council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To report on a request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to permit a front yard parking pad at 109 Albertus Avenue which does not meet the requirements of the Code. As this is an appeal and a request for an exemption from the by-law, it is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Front Yard Parking - 109 Albertus Ave. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23659.pdf) Attachment 1 - Front Yard Parking - 109 Albertus Ave. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23660.pdf) |
Communications |
(September 4, 2009) Letter from Patricia Higginbottom (NY.Main.NY27.76.1) |
NY28.12 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Request for an exemption from Chapter 313 of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code - To permit an encroaching retaining wall at 32 Wanless Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for an exemption from Chapter 313 of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit the maintenance of an encroaching retaining wall fronting 32 Wanless Avenue. |
Origin |
(August 5, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter over which community council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To report on a request for an exemption from Chapter 313 of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit the maintenance of an encroaching retaining wall fronting 32 Wanless Avenue for which Transportation Services setback requirements have not been met. As this is an appeal and a request for an exemption from the by-law, it is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Encroachment Agreement - 32 Wanless Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23653.pdf) Attachment 1 - Encroachment Agreement - 32 Wanless Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23654.pdf) |
NY28.13 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 26 |
Request for an exemption from the former Borough of East York Municipal Code to permit an encroaching landscape wall at 182 Hanna Road |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council deferred consideration of the report (April 23, 2009) from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District, to its next meeting on November 10, 2009. |
Origin |
(April 23, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.
To report on a request for an exemption from the former Borough of East York Municipal Code to permit the maintenance of an encroaching landscape wall fronting 182 Hanna Road which does not meet the required 0.3 metre setback from the municipal sidewalk. As this is an appeal and a request for an exemption from the by-law, it is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Request for Exemption - Encroaching Landscape Wall - 182 Hanna Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23643.pdf) Attachment 1 - Request for Exemption - Encroaching Landscape Wall - 182 Hanna Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23644.pdf) |
NY28.14 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 26 |
Request for an exemption from the former Borough of East York Municipal Code – To permit encroaching landscape features at 45 Parklea Drive |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the appeal to maintain the encroaching 0.15 metre high landscape wall at 45 Parklea Drive, as removal may damage the existing mature City owned tree in the vicinity, subject to the applicant entering into an encroachment agreement acknowledging responsibility for maintenance and liability.
2. Denied the appeal to maintain the encroaching sprinkler system and light post with outlet at 45 Parklea Drive, as they are not permitted encroachments. |
Origin |
(August 6, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To report on a request for an exemption from the former Borough of East York Municipal Code to permit the maintenance of an encroaching landscape wall, sprinkler system and light post with outlet, fronting 45 Parklea Drive, which do not meet the provisions set out in By-law No. 111-92. As this is an appeal and a request for an exemption from the by-law, it is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Encroaching Agreement Request - 45 Parklea Dr. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23655.pdf) Attachment 1 - Encroachment Agreement Request - 45 Parklea Dr. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23656.pdf) |
NY28.15 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 16 |
Request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code – To permit front yard parking at 73 Unsworth Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to permit front yard parking at 73 Unsworth Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District. |
Origin |
(September 4, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter over which North York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To report on a request for an exemption from Chapter 918 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to permit front yard parking at 73 Unsworth Avenue which does not meet the requirements of this Chapter. As this is an appeal and a request for an exemption from the by-law, it is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Front Yard Parking - 73 Unsworth Ave (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23674.pdf) Drawing - Site Plan of the Proposed Front Yard Parking Pad - 73 Unsworth Ave (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23675.pdf) |
NY28.16 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 23 |
Sign Variance - 515 Drewry Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for sign variances at 515 Drewry Avenue. |
Origin |
(September 22, 2009) Report from Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended to that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
The purpose of this report is to review and make recommendations on a request by Todd Trudelle of The Goldberg Group, on behalf of Imperial Oil Ltd., owners of the property at 515 Drewry Avenue for approval of a variance from the former North York Sign By-law 30788, as amended, to permit the erection of six business identification ground signs in conjunction with the Carwash, Service Station/Convenience Store containing a Tim Hortons pick up and Drive-Through facility which are currently under construction at this location. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachments 1-5 - Sign Variance - 515 Drewry Ave. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23616.pdf) |
NY28.17 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 23 |
Residential Demolition - 2 Anndale Drive |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request to demolish the residential building at 2 Anndale Drive, with the following conditions:
a. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition and the excavation be filled in;
b. the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5 and 629-10, Paragraph B;
c. the site be sodded within three (3) months of the demolition of the residential building (weather permitting); and
d. the subject property be maintained in full compliance with the City’s By-laws. |
Origin |
(September 22, 2009) Report from Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or bylaws.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the former City of Toronto Municipal Code Ch. 363, Article 11 “Demolition Control”, the application for demolition of the single family dwelling 2 Anndale Drive is referred to Toronto North Community Council to refuse or to grant the application, including any conditions, to be attached to the demolition permit. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachment 1 - Residential Demolition - 2 Anndale Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23593.pdf) |
NY28.18 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 23 |
Residential Demolition Application for 283 Greenfield Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request to demolish the residential building at 283 Greenfield Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
a. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition and excavation filled in;
b. the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623 – 5 and 629 – 10, Paragraph B;
c. the site be sodded within three (3) months of the demolition of the residential building (weather permitting); and
d. the subject property be maintained in full compliance with the City’s By-laws. |
Origin |
(September 22, 2009) Report from Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies from City policy or by-law.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code Ch. 363, Article 11, “Demolition Control”, an application for a demolition permit at 283 Greenfield Avenue is referred to North York Community Council to refuse or to grant the demolition permit. The City of Toronto owns the property at 283 Greenfield Avenue and requires permission to demolish the existing dwelling in order to supplement a new park at Greenfield Avenue.
If the North York Community Council grants issuance of the demolition permits, it may do so with or without conditions. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachment 1 - Residential Demolition Application for 283 Greenfield Ave. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23594.pdf) |
NY28.19 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: 34 |
Demolition Control Applications - 60 Rowena Drive (5 Avonwick Gate) |
Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice in the report from the City Solicitor (October 8, 2009) that is subject to solicitor-client privilege |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the application to demolish the subject residential building at 60 Rowena Drive (5 Avonwick Gate).
2. City Council receive the confidential legal advice set out in Attachment 1 to the report (October 8, 2009) from the City Solicitor.
3. City Council direct that the information contained in Attachment 1 to the report (October 8, 2009) from the City Solicitor, remains confidential. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council met in closed session to consider this Item as the report with confidential attachment (October 8, 2009) from the City Solicitor relates to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. |
Origin |
(September 18, 2009) Report from Edward Tipping, Director and Deputy Chief Building Official |
Summary |
This Staff Report is about a matter for which Community Council does not have delegated authority from City Council to make a decision on whether to issue or refuse the permit to demolish the residential properties at the above noted address because the buildings on the subject property have a heritage designation under the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA).
On March 6, 2009 Toronto Building received a demolition permit application to demolish three vacant residential buildings located at 60 Rowena Drive (also known as 5 Avonwick Gate). The buildings on the property have been designated under the OHA.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article II “Demolition Control”, the above noted demolition permit application is submitted to the North York Community Council for consideration and to make recommendation to refuse or to grant the issuance of a demolition permit because the owner has not applied for a building permit to replace the buildings to be demolished.
If the North York Community Council recommends granting the issuance of the demolition permit, it may do so with or without conditions.
The recommendation to grant or to refuse the demolition application will be forwarded to City Council for a final decision. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachments 1-2 - Demolition Control Applications - 60 Rowena Drive (5 Avonwick Gate) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23592.pdf) |
Communications |
(October 6, 2009) E-mail from Helen P. Sunter (NY.New.NY28.19.1) (October 13, 2009) E-mail from Steven J. O'Melia, Miller Thomson LLP, on behalf of Toronto Catholic District School Board (NY.New.NY28.19.2) |
19a | Demolition Control Applications – 60 Rowena Drive (5 Avonwick Gate) |
Origin |
(October 8, 2009) Report from City Solicitor |
Summary |
North York Community Council, at its meeting of October 13, 2009 will be dealing with a report dated September 28, 2009 from the Director and Deputy Chief Building Official with respect to an application to demolish residential buildings at 60 Rowena Drive (5 Avonwick Gate). The application is required under chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code and section 33 of the Planning Act.
As the subject property has been designated under the Ontario Heritage Act City Council has previously dealt with a report for consent to demolish the designated buildings and decided to refuse to consent to the demolition.
The purpose of this report is to provide the Community Council with legal advice related to its decision on the application to demolish the buildings pursuant to Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code and section 33 of the Planning Act. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Demolition Control Applications - 60 Rowena Drive (5 Avonwick Gate) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24201.pdf) |
NY28.20 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 15 |
One-Way Street Designation/Turn Prohibitions - 2401 Dufferin Street (Belgravia Avenue and Whitemore Avenue) |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Amended By-law Nos. 196-84 and 2958-94, of the former City of York, to delete Whitmore Avenue as an eastbound one-way street, from the Dufferin Street to Marlee Avenue.
2. Amended By-law Nos. 196-84 and 2958-94, of the former City of York, to add Whitmore Avenue as an eastbound one-way street, from the a point 40 metres east of Dufferin Street to Marlee Avenue.
3. Amended By-law Nos. 196-84 and 2958-94, of the former City of York, to prohibit westbound right movements from Belgravia Avenue into the driveway access to 2401 Dufferin Street. |
Origin |
(September 18, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to convert the one-way operation of Whitmore Avenue from Dufferin Street to a point 40 metres east to a two-way operation, construct a traffic island on the north side of Whitmore Avenue opposite the new driveway access, and to prohibit westbound right turns from Belgravia Avenue in to the driveway access of 2401 Dufferin Street located on the north side of Belgravia Avenue.
The re-designation of Whitmore Avenue from Dufferin Street to a location approximately 40 metres east thereof will provide access and egress to 2401 Dufferin Street via the signalized access of Dufferin Street and Whitmore Avenue and the driveway access on to Belgravia Avenue will provide egress from the site. The proposed site access modifications will result in the elimination of a driveway access point on Dufferin Street and address the residents concerns regarding infiltration into the neighbourhood. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - One-way Street Designation/Turn Restrictions - 2401 Dufferin Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23681.pdf) Map - One-way Street Designation/Turn Restrictions - 2401 Dufferin Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23682.pdf) |
NY28.21 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 16 |
Left Turn/Entry Prohibition - 59 Briar Hill Avenue |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Prohibited northbound left turns at anytime from the driveway at 59 Briar Hill Avenue on to Briar Hill Avenue.
2. Prohibited entry at anytime from Briar Hill Avenue on to the private driveway at 59 Briar Hill Avenue. |
Origin |
(September 18, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to implement a westbound “No Left Turn” movement prohibition from the driveway of number 59 Briar Hill Avenue along with a “Do Not Enter” prohibition into the same driveway on the south side of Briar Hill Avenue.
The implementation of the prohibited left turn and entrance restriction will result in the safe and smooth egress onto Briar Hill Avenue. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Left Turn/Entry Prohibition - 59 Briar Hill Ave (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23668.pdf) Map - Left Turn/Entry Prohibition - 59 Briar Hill Ave (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23669.pdf) |
NY28.22 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 16 |
Turn Restrictions - Avenue Road at Glencairn Avenue |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit eastbound left turns from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on Glencairn Avenue at Avenue Road.
2. City Council prohibit westbound left turns from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on Glencairn Avenue at Avenue Road.
3. City Council prohibit eastbound through traffic movements from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on Glencairn Avenue and Avenue Road.
4. City Council prohibit westbound through traffic movements from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on Glencairn Avenue at Avenue Road. |
Origin |
(September 18, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
To obtain approval to implement turn restrictions at the intersection of Avenue Road and Glencairn Avenue.
The proposed turn restrictions will address the safety concerns regarding left turning and through movements at the intersection of Avenue Road and Glencairn Avenue.
Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the proposed turn prohibition removal and have not objected to the proposal. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Turn Restrictions - Avenue Road at Glencairn Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23637.pdf) Map - Avenue Road at Glencairn Avenue, Left and Through Prohibitions (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23638.pdf) |
NY28.23 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 25 |
Operational Changes to Traffic Control Signal - Bayview Avenue at 2365 Bayview Avenue (Crescent School) |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the existing westbound left turn restriction at all times, from the access to 2365 Bayview Avenue (Crescent School). |
Origin |
(September 18, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
To obtain approval to rescind the existing westbound left turn prohibition at Bayview Avenue at the access to 2365 Bayview Avenue (Crescent School).
The removal of the above-noted traffic control measure will provide full movement egress from the access to Crescent School and improve southbound traffic operations on Bayview Avenue during the peak periods.
Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bayview Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the proposed turn prohibition removal and have not objected to the proposal. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Operational Changes to Traffic Control Signal - Bayview Ave at 2365 Bayview Ave (Crescent School) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23640.pdf) Map - Westbound Left Turn Prohibition Removal, Bayview Ave at Crescent School (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23641.pdf) Map - Existing Westbound to Southbound Routing from the Crescent School (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23642.pdf) |
NY28.24 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 25 |
Parking Prohibitions - Ternhill Crescent |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Amended Schedule VIII of By-law No. 31001, of the former City of North York, to prohibit parking from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday to Saturday on both sides of Ternhill Crescent, from the north limit of Overland Drive to a point 89 metres to the north thereof. |
Origin |
(September 24, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval in order to prohibit parking on both sides of Ternhill Crescent from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, from Overland Drive to a point 89 m to the north thereof.
The implementation of the parking prohibition will address the residents’ concern regarding vehicles continually parked on both sides of Ternhill Crescent between Overland Drive and a point 89 metres north thereof. |
Background Information |
Staff Report - Parking Prohibitions - Ternhill Crescent (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23664.pdf) Map - Parking Prohibitions - Ternhill Crescent (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23665.pdf) |
NY28.25 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
|
Town of Markham Yonge and Steeles Corridor Study and City of Vaughan Yonge Street Area Study |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Referred the following recommendations moved by Councillor Moscoe, to the Director, Community Planning, North York District, for a report to the North York Community Council for its meeting on January 12, 2010:
“That:
a. Staff identify an appropriate study area within the Yonge Corridor abutting the City of Vaughan and the City of Markham Study areas.
b. Staff co-ordinate its study area with the studies being undertaken with the two other municipalities.
c. Staff report on a preliminary basis to the North York Community Council no later than February, 2010.”
2. Requested the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the Director, Transportation Services Division, to review and comment to the North York Community Council, for its meeting on January 12, 2009, on the safeguards that are proposed in the Markham and Vaughan OPA for the Yonge and Steeles area, such report to also include comments on:
a. what additional safeguards can be considered;
b. specifically, the provisions which require the subway and/or the Busway improvement to be in place prior to development in these areas. |
Origin |
(August 14, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District |
Summary |
This report provides information on the planning studies being conducted by the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan for the area around Yonge Street and Steeles Avenue. The final report for the Town of Markham Yonge and Steeles Corridor Study was endorsed in principle by Markham Council in October 2008 and the next step is to prepare a draft Official Plan Amendment implementing the Study’s recommendations and hold the Statutory Public Meeting.
The City of Vaughan Yonge Street Area Study is underway and is currently in the public consultation stage. A draft final report is expected within the next few months. The study area boundaries are shown on Attachment 1. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachment 1 - Town of Markham Yonge & Steeles Corridor Study & City of Vaughan Yonge Street Area Study (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23623.pdf) |
NY28.26 | ACTION |
Referred |
|
Ward: 15 |
1100-1150 Caledonia Road - Interpretation of the Official Plan |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Referred the following motion, moved by Councillor Moscoe, to the Planning and Growth Management Committee, for its consideration:
"1. That the Planning and Growth Management Committee, in reviewing the Official Plan as it applies to employment areas, give consideration to:
a. excluding main streets that bisect employment areas, as areas permitting big box retail;
b. excluding from consideration as the “boundary” of employment areas that abut residential zones or whose access is limited by physical barriers, like railways, and limited access highways.” |
Origin |
(August 19, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division |
Summary |
This report responds to City Council’s May 25, 26 and 27, 2009 direction that City Planning staff provide an interpretation of the Employment Areas policies of the Official Plan as they apply to lands known municipally as 1100-1150 Caledonia Road and report to North York Community Council and Planning and Growth Management Committee with respect to the interpretation of the applicable policy. City Planning staff, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and the City Solicitor are of the opinion that Policy 4.6.3 would apply to an application proposing major retail uses on these lands. |
Background Information |
Staff Report and Attachments 1-5 - 1100-1150 Caledonia Road - Interpretation of the Official Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23651.pdf) |
NY28.27 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 23 |
Final Report - Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Applications - 91, 93, 95, 97, 99 Finch Avenue West |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council, in accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (September 21, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:
a. the conditions generally listed in Attachment 3 to the report (September 21, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which unless otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration;
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate; and
c. draft plan approval not being issued until the necessary Bill(s) is in full force and effect.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law, with respect to the subject lands, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills for a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law to expire (2) years from date of enactment.
4. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor for all current property taxes for the subject site prior to enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
5. City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer and charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate prior to the introduction of Bills in Council.
6. City Council direct that the Chief Planner or his delegate not provide written consent to transfer and charge any parts of the lands until all appropriate pre-approval conditions in the Site Plan Agreement are fulfilled.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium Plan has been registered.
8. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on October 13, 2009, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council. |
Origin |
(September 21, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District |
Summary |
These applications were made on June 3, 2009 (CD) and May 15, 2009 (PL) and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The Common Elements Condominium application is required to provide legal access to the individual townhouse units and to ensure ongoing shared ownership and maintenance of the common elements including the private driveway.
The exemption from Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of individual conveyable townhouse and semi-detached lots.
This report recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and approval of the application to lift Part Lot Control subject to the conditions listed below, including that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without the prior consent of the Chief Planner or his designate. |
Background Information |
Final Report & Attachments 1-4 - 91, 93, 95, 97, 99 Finch Ave. W. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23629.pdf) |
NY28.28 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: 25 |
Final Report – Partial Removal of the Holding (H) Symbol application – 2075 Bayview Ave Sunnybrook Hospital |
Public Notice Given |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (April 22, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the applicant to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions of Site Plan Approval before the necessary Bills are introduced to City Council for enactment.
4. City Council direct that Sunnybrook Hospital and the University of Toronto be advised that the City of Toronto’s long term ambulance plan includes the need for an ambulance station to be located in the vicinity of the hospital in order to provide necessary emergency fire protection to the hospital campus and the surrounding community.
5. City Council direct that Sunnybrook Hospital and the University of Toronto be reminded of their obligation to convey to the City of Toronto a site for an ambulance station which was an agreed upon condition of the original zoning for the hospital site expansion, at no cost to the City.
6. City Council direct that Sunnybrook Hospital and the University of Toronto that when the next phase of hospital development approval occurs or the holding symbol is further lifted, the provision of the ambulance station site (at no cost to the City) will be requested as a condition of development. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
Notice of Intent to Remove a Holding Symbol (H) was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(April 22, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District |
Summary |
This application was made on January 26, 2009 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a 780 m2 (8,400 ft2) 2 – storey addition to the existing Wellspring Centre facility located on the northwest portion of the Sunnybrook Hospital campus site at 2075 Bayview Avenue. The addition requires a partial removal of the holding symbol (H) to permit an increase in density which would bring the total gross floor area of the hospital campus to 259,480 m2 (2,793,108 ft2) or 0.66 fsi. The application is recommended for approval on the basis that the proposed addition is appropriate and satisfies the criteria to permit a partial lifting of the hold on the subject property. This report recommends that the bills proceed to Council once the applicant has obtained Notice of Conditions of Site Plan Approval. |
Background Information |
Staff Report & Attachments 1-5 - Final Report - 2075 Bayview Ave Sunnybrook Hospital (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23671.pdf) |
NY28.29 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 9 |
Report on Construction Activities at 145 Spalding Road |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Requested the Director of Building and Deputy Chief Building Official to prepare a report on the permit history and construction activities at 145 Spalding Road for inclusion in the North York Community Council meeting of November 10, 2009. |
Origin |
(October 13, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Augimeri |
Summary |
Over the past year, the construction of a garage at 145 Spalding Road has caused concern for a neighbouring resident who maintains that this garage has not been built in accordance with the Ontario Building Code and North York Zoning By-law 7625.
As a consequence, the City Councillor has been requested to add this item to the agenda of North York Community Council. |
Background Information |
Notice of Motion - Report on Construction Activities at 145 Spalding Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24194.pdf) |
NY28.30 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 9 |
Curb Cut and Installation of Accessibility Ramps on Seeley Drive |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Requested the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District, to report to the North York Community Council meeting on November 10, 2009 on:
a. a feasibility study on curb cuts and installation of accessibility ramps in front of the walkways at 24, 25 and 27 Seeley Drive, as well as at the end of Seeley Drive leading into Diana Drive; and
b. suggested potential solutions to prohibit parking in front of the Seeley Drive buildings’ walkways in order to facilitate access for EMS and Fire Services. |
Origin |
(October 13, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Augimeri |
Summary |
Seeley Drive is a dead end street with four rental buildings. The east side of Seeley Drive has a sidewalk while the west side does not. The projected year of installation for a sidewalk on the west side of Seeley Drive is 2020.
There are approximately 350 residents residing on Seeley Drive, many of whom are seniors and require accessible entrances to their building. Currently, 18 Seeley Drive is the only building with a ramp located at the end of the walkway that leads to the entrance of the building. Residents also access Diana Drive from Seeley Drive via a small pedestrian entranceway at the end of Seeley Drive to facilitate traveling eastbound to Keele Street as opposed to traveling uphill on Sheppard Ave. West to reach Keele Street.
Cars parking on Seeley Drive often park directly in front of the buildings’ walkways. There have been concerns expressed about the difficulty EMS and Fire Services are having in getting into the buildings as a result.
Curb cuts and installation of accessibility ramps at the end of the buildings’ walkways and at the end of Seeley Drive leading into the Diana Drive entrance would help alleviate difficulties encountered by disabled individuals residing on Seeley Drive. |
Background Information |
Notice of Motion - Curb Cut and Installation of Accessibility Ramps on Seeley Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24195.pdf) |
NY28.31 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 9 |
Curb Cut for Driveway Widening at 71 Letchworth Crescent |
Committee Decision |
North York Community Council:
1. Approved a variance from the North York Driveway and Entrance Policy authorizing a 0.6 metre extension of the driveway opening beyond the maximum 6.0 metre ramp opening at 71 Letchworth Crescent. |
Origin |
(October 13, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Augimeri |
Summary |
The resident of 71 Letchworth Crescent has obtained a permit to re-pave his interlock driveway. The driveway and ramp presently serving this property is 6.0 metres wide. The resident would like to widen the existing 6.0 metre wide curb cut an additional 0.60 metres (2 feet) over the maximum allowed driveway ramp opening specified in the North York Driveway and Entrance Policy. The length of curb requested to be removed has also been badly damaged by a snow plow last year. |
Background Information |
Curb Cut for Driveway Widening at 71 Letchworth Crescent (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24196.pdf) |
NY28.32 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 16 |
Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - A0250/09NY - 350 Briar Hill Avenue |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate Planning Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s decision regarding application A0250/09NY relating to 350 Briar Hill Avenue. |
Origin |
(October 13, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Stintz |
Summary |
On September 2, 2009 the Committee of Adjustment modified an application to demolish the existing dwelling and construct a new two-storey dwelling with a gross floor area of 185.8m2 (0.60 times the area of the lot) whereas a maximum of 108.36m² (0.35 times the area of the lot) is permitted. In addition, variances were requested for a proposed east side yard setback of .4m and proposed front yard soft landscaping area of 72.6%. The City Planning Staff Report recommended that the gross floor area be reduced to be more in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood, to better maintain the intent and purpose of the By-law, as well as with previous Committee decisions noting that the vast majority of approvals in the area had been approved with a gross floor area of .54 time the area of the lot or less.
It was the decision of the Committee of Adjustment that the Minor Variance Application be approved on Condition:
The Committee of Adjustment Approved the following variances: - Proposed east side yard setback of .4m whereas a minimum of 1.2m is required for the portion of the building not exceeding 17m in length; and - Proposed front yard soft landscaping area of 72.6% whereas a minimum of 75% is required.
The Committee of Adjustment Modified and Approved the following variance: - Proposed gross floor area of 167.2m2 (0.54 times the area of the lot), whereas a maximum of 108.36m2 (0.35 times the area of the lot) is permitted;
This modification achieves the following goals: - The general intent and purpose of the Official Plan is maintained. - The general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law is maintained. - The variance(s) is considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land. - In the opinion of the Committee the variance(s) is minor.
The decision was subject to the following conditions(s):
1. The owner shall satisfy the City of Toronto Municipal code Chapter 813, Article II, with respect to City owned trees, to the satisfaction of the Urban Forestry Division.
2. The owner shall submit a Tree Security Deposit (in the form of a certified cheques or letter of credit only) and sign a Tree Preservation Agreement to the satisfaction of the Urban Forestry Division.
The applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. |
Background Information |
Notice of Motion - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 350 Briar Hill Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24218.pdf) |
NY28.33 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 23 |
Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Committee of Adjustment Application - 122 Anndale Drive |
Committee Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the City’s By-law and the Committee of Adjustment’s decisions. |
Origin |
(October 13, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor John Filion |
Summary |
Pedro Miguel Viera and Angela Kosmatos, the owners of 122 Anndale Drive, submitted an application to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel, for the construction of a new two storey dwelling with an integral, at grade garage.
Variances were requested with respect to lot coverage of 36.9% (188.6m2), front yard setback of 5.79m, west side yard setback of 1.38m to the 6.3m long portion of the at grade garage, overall building length of 18.67m, building height of 9.0m, finished first floor elevation of 1.71m and front yard setback of 3.96m to the front stairs.
Planning staff commented that the proposed lot coverage was excessive for the area and would not respect and reinforce the existing physical character of the area. Staff further commented that the proposed height was also excessive. Staff recommended that the proposed lot coverage and height variances be refused.
The Committee of Adjustment for the City of Toronto (North District) APPROVED the variances requested for a front yard setback of 5.79m, a west side yard setback of 1.38m to the 6.3m long portion of the at grade garage, overall building length of 18.67m, a finished first floor elevation of 1.71m and a front yard setback of 3.96m to the front stairs. The Committee MODIFIED the variance requested for lot coverage to 32% (163.52m2). The Committee REFUSED the variance requested for a building height of 9.0m. The decision was subject to Forestry conditions
The applicant has appealed the decision of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board.
The Ontario Municipal Board has not set a hearing date for these applications.
The Councillor is requesting representation at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing. |
Background Information |
Notice of Motion and Attachments - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Committee of Adjustment Application - 122 Anndale Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24217.pdf) |
NY28.34 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
|
Enactment of By-laws |
Committee Decision |
General Bills North York Community Council enacted By-laws 1004-2009 to 1014-2009.
Confirmatory Bill North York Community Council passed a Confirmatory Bill as By-law 1015-2009. |
Summary |
Introduction and consideration of bills for enactment as By-laws. |
Background Information |
North York Community Council By-law Index for October 13, 2009 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-24269.pdf) |
Meeting Sessions |
Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
2009-10-13 | Morning | 9:40 AM | 11:39 AM | Public |
2009-10-13 | Morning | 11:40 AM | 12:29 PM | Closed |
2009-10-13 | Afternoon | 12:29 PM | 12:30 PM | Public |
2009-10-13 | Afternoon | 1:40 PM | 2:45 PM | Public |