City of Toronto Logo Contents

For City Council Consideration on
April 6, 2009



North York Community Council


Meeting No. 24   Contact Francine Adamo, Committee Administrator
Meeting Date Thursday, March 26, 2009
  Phone 416-395-7348
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail nycc@toronto.ca
Location Council Chamber, North York Civic Centre
  Chair   Councillor Maria Augimeri  

Item   Page

NY24.13 Payment In-Lieu of Parking - 370 Wilson Avenue (Ward: 10)

NY24.14 Payment In-Lieu of Parking - 5315 Yonge Street (Ward: 23)

NY24.15 Parking Prohibitions - Keele Street (Ward: 8)

NY24.16 50 km/h Speed Limit/Zone - Wilson Avenue, Dufferin Street to Wilson Heights Boulevard (Ward: 9, 10)

NY24.20 Turn/Entry Prohibition - 912, 930 & 940 Mount Pleasant Road (Ward: 25)

NY24.23 Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1075-1095 Leslie Street (Ward: 25)

NY24.24 Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 939 Lawrence Ave. East (Part B) (Ward: 25)

NY24.25 Renaming of Flemingdon Arena (Ward: 26)

NY24.26 Request for Extension of Existing Liquor Licence for Community Event - Armenian Community Centre Annual Summerfest (Ward: 33)

NY24.27 Assumption of Services - Subdivision owned by Metrodome Properties Inc., Plan 66M-2382, Subdivision File S-1243 - Green Meadow Circle (5365 Leslie Street) (Ward: 33)

NY24.28 Review of Site Plan Approval - 12 Rean Drive- Shared Loading and Waste Collection Area (Ward: 24)

NY24.31 378 Steeles Avenue East in the Town of Markham

NY24.32 Final Report - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - 65 and 67 Finch Avenue West (Ward: 23)

NY24.33 Request for Direction Report - Site Plan Applications - 182-184 Norton Avenue (Ward: 23)

NY24.34 Zoning Amendments to Repeal Bylaws That Regulate Reverse Slope Driveways in the North York Community Council District Boundary (Ward: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34)

NY24.35 Zoning Amendments to Regulate Reverse Slope Driveways in the North York Community Council District Boundary (Ward: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34)

NY24.36 Decision of the Agnes Macphail Award Selection Committee - Recipient of the 2009 Agnes Macphail Award (Ward: 25)



City of Toronto Amended Committee Report
City of Toronto Logo Committee Report

Considered by City Council on:
April 6, 2009



North York Community Council


Meeting No. 24   Contact Francine Adamo, Committee Administrator
Meeting Date Thursday, March 26, 2009
  Phone 416-395-7348
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail nycc@toronto.ca
Location Council Chamber, North York Civic Centre
  Chair   Councillor Maria Augimeri  

NY24.13

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 10 

Payment In-Lieu of Parking - 370 Wilson Avenue
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council exempt the applicant from the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 requirement of eight (8) parking spaces, subject to payment in-lieu for four (4) parking spaces, and an on-site provision of four (4) parking spaces.

 

2.         City Council require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the City of Toronto for the payment in-lieu of four (4) parking spaces, based upon the proposed gross floor area (GFA), which in this case amounts to $10,000.00.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council exempt the applicant from the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 requirement of eight (8) parking spaces, subject to payment in-lieu for four (4) parking spaces, and an on-site provision of four (4) parking spaces.

 

2.         City Council require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the City of Toronto for the payment in-lieu of four (4) parking spaces, based upon the proposed gross floor area (GFA), which in this case amounts to $10,000.00.

Origin
(March 5, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services, North York District
Summary

To seek Council’s approval to exempt the applicant from the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 requirement of eight (8) parking spaces to permit the existing commercial building to be used as a professional medical office, whereas four (4) parking spaces can be provided on-site.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Payment In-Lieu of Parking - 370 Wilson Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19475.pdf)

Attachment 1 - Location Map - 370 Wilson Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19476.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Divino Sabilano, applicant


NY24.14

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 23 

Payment In-Lieu of Parking - 5315 Yonge Street
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council exempt the applicant from the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 requirement of 7 parking spaces, subject to payment-in-lieu for 2 parking spaces.

 

2.         City Council require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the City of Toronto for the payment-in-lieu of 2 parking spaces, based upon the proposed gross floor area (GFA), which in this case amounts to $5,000.00.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council exempt the applicant from the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 requirement of 7 parking spaces, subject to payment-in-lieu for 2 parking spaces.

 

2.         City Council require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the City of Toronto for the payment-in-lieu of 2 parking spaces, based upon the proposed gross floor area (GFA), which in this case amounts to $5,000.00.

Origin
(February 2, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services, North York District
Summary

To seek Council’s approval to exempt the applicant from the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 requirement of 7 parking spaces to permit a salon and spa on the ground floor and basement level and a professional office on the second floor, whereas zero(0) parking spaces can be provided on-site.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Payment In-Lieu of Parking - 5315 Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19512.pdf)

Attachment 1 - Location Map - 5315 Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19513.pdf)


NY24.15

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 8 

Parking Prohibitions - Keele Street
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (February 26, 2009) from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (February 26, 2009) from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District.

Origin
(February 26, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District
Summary

To obtain approval to prohibit parking on both sides of Keele Street from The Pond Road to Canarctic Drive.

 

The implementation of the proposed parking prohibitions will eliminate on-street parking activity on the east side of Keele Street, north of The Pond Road and improve motorist’s safety.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Parking Prohibitions - Keele Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19477.pdf)

Attachment 1 - Location Map - Keele Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19478.pdf)


NY24.16

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: 9, 10 

50 km/h Speed Limit/Zone - Wilson Avenue, Dufferin Street to Wilson Heights Boulevard
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct that the 60 km/h speed limit on Wilson Avenue between Wilson Heights Boulevard and Dufferin Street, be deleted.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the 60 km/h speed limit on Wilson Avenue between Wilson Heights Boulevard and Dufferin Street, be deleted.

Origin
(February 27, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District
Summary

To obtain approval to reduce the existing 60 km/h speed limit to 50 km/h on Wilson Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Wilson Heights Boulevard.

 

The reduction of the existing speed limit between Dufferin Street and Wilson Heights Boulevard will result in a continuous speed limit of 50 km/h speed on Wilson Avenue and address the residents concerns with regard to the rate of speed of vehicles on this section of roadway.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Wilson Avenue, Dufferin Street to Wilson Heights Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19515.pdf)

Attachment 1 - Map - Wilson Avenue, Dufferin Street to Wilson Heights Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19516.pdf)


NY24.20

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 25 

Turn/Entry Prohibition - 912, 930 & 940 Mount Pleasant Road
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct that eastbound left turns from the private driveway at the intersection of Mount Pleasant Road and Elvina Gardens be prohibited at anytime.

 

2.         City Council direct that eastbound through movements from the private driveway at the intersection of Mount Pleasant Road and Elvina Gardens be prohibited at anytime.

 

3.         City Council direct that entry be prohibited at anytime to the private driveway on the south side of Erskine Avenue located 20 metres west of Mount Pleasant Road.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that eastbound left turns from the private driveway at the intersection of Mount Pleasant Road and Elvina Gardens be prohibited at anytime.

 

2.         City Council direct that eastbound through movements from the private driveway at the intersection of Mount Pleasant Road and Elvina Gardens be prohibited at anytime.

 

3.         City Council direct that entry be prohibited at anytime to the private driveway on the south side of Erskine Avenue located 20 metres west of Mount Pleasant Road.

Origin
(March 2, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District
Summary

To obtain approval to implement an eastbound “No Left Turn” and an eastbound “No Through” movement prohibition from the driveway of number 912, 930, and 940 Mount Pleasant Road opposite Elvina Gardens at Mount Pleasant Road and a “Do Not Enter” prohibition to the townhouse development’s driveway access on the south side of Erskine Avenue 20 metres west of Mount Pleasant Road.

 

The implementation of the proposed turn and entry prohibitions would be in keeping with approved Site Plan Application No. 303063. The eastbound left-turn and through restrictions from the driveway at the intersection of Mount Pleasant Road and Elvina Gardens will minimize the impact on traffic on Mount Pleasant Road. The proposed Do Not Enter restrictions to the exit only driveway on the south side of Erskine Avenue, 20 metres west of Mount Pleasant Road, will prevent vehicles from entering the townhouse development at this location.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Turn/Entry Prohibition - 912, 930 & 940 Mount Pleasant Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19494.pdf)

Attachment 1 - Map - 912, 930, & 940 Mount Pleasant Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19495.pdf)


NY24.23

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 25 

Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1075-1095 Leslie Street
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1075-1095 Leslie Street.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1075-1095 Leslie Street.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin
(January 15, 2009) Report from Toronto Fire Services
Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Fire Routes - 1075-1095 Leslie Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-18969.pdf)

Draft By-law - Fire Routes - 1075-1095 Leslie Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-18970.pdf)


NY24.24

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 25 

Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 939 Lawrence Ave. East (Part B)
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 939 Lawrence Ave. E. (Part B).

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 939 Lawrence Ave. E. (Part B).

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin
(February 25, 2009) Report from Toronto Fire Services
Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Fire Routes - 939 Lawrence Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19424.pdf)

Draft By-law - Fire Routes - 939 Lawrence Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19425.pdf)


NY24.25

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 26 

Renaming of Flemingdon Arena
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council approve the renaming of the Flemingdon Arena located at 165 Grenoble Dr, near Don Mills and Eglinton Ave. W., to the Angela James Arena in Flemingdon Park in accordance with the criteria outlined in the Naming and Renaming for Parks and Recreation Facilities and Parks Policy.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the renaming of the Flemingdon Arena located at 165 Grenoble Dr, near Don Mills and Eglinton Ave. W., to the Angela James Arena in Flemingdon Park in accordance with the criteria outlined in the Naming and Renaming for Parks and Recreation Facilities and Parks Policy.

Origin
(February 26, 2009) Report from General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation
Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek North York Community Council approval to rename the Flemingdon Arena to the Angela James Arena in Flemingdon Park, in recognition of Ms. James’ accomplishments in the sports world, as well as her inspiration to local residents as a product of the Flemingdon Park community.

 

Parks, Forestry and Recreation has exercised due diligence in ensuring that all criteria in the Naming and Renaming for Parks and Recreation Facilities and Parks Policy has been met and recommends the renaming of this arena. The Ward Councillor has also expressed his support in renaming this arena in honour of Angela James.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Renaming of Flemingdon Arena
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19404.pdf)

Member Motion - Renaming of Flemingdon Arena
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19406.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Andrew Fairbairn


NY24.26

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 33 

Request for Extension of Existing Liquor Licence for Community Event - Armenian Community Centre Annual Summerfest
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council, for liquor licensing purposes, advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the request for an extension of an existing liquor licence, from Harmik Ghalustians, Manager, Armenian Community Centre, for the 13th Annual ACC (Armenian Community Centre) Summerfest, an outdoor function, to be held on Friday, July 10, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 11, 2009 from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 12, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at 50 Hallcrown Place, which has been designated by the North York Community Council as an event of municipal significance.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, for liquor licensing purposes, advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the request for an extension of an existing liquor licence, from Harmik Ghalustians, Manager, Armenian Community Centre, for the 13th Annual ACC (Armenian Community Centre) Summerfest, an outdoor function, to be held on Friday, July 10, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 11, 2009 from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 12, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at 50 Hallcrown Place, which has been designated by the North York Community Council as an event of municipal significance.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be an event of Municipal Significance:

  

a.         The 13th Annual ACC (Armenian Community Centre) Summerfest to be held on Friday, July 10, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 11, 2009 from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 12, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at 50 Hallcrown Place.

Origin
(February 11, 2009) Fax from Harmik Ghalustians, Manager, Armenian Community Centre
Summary

Request by the Manager, Armenian Community Centre for an extension of the existing Liquor Licence for the 13th Annual ACC (Armenian Community Centre) Summerfest on Friday, July 10, 2009 from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 11, 2009, from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 12, from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m..


NY24.27

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 33 

Assumption of Services - Subdivision owned by Metrodome Properties Inc., Plan 66M-2382, Subdivision File S-1243 - Green Meadow Circle (5365 Leslie Street)
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

  

1.         City Council pass an assumption by-law to assume the municipal services in Subdivision Plan 66M-2382.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

  

1.         City Council pass an assumption by-law to assume the municipal services in Subdivision Plan 66M-2382.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin
(February 19, 2009) Report from Acting Director, Development Engineering
Summary

This report recommends that the municipal services installed under the terms of the Subdivision Agreement for Plan 66M-2382, between Metrodome Properties Inc. and the City of Toronto are in the required condition to be assumed by the City.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Assumption of Services - Green Meadow Circle (5365 Leslie Street)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19306.pdf)


(Deferred from February 9, 2009 - NY23.28)
NY24.28

 

Amended 

 

Ward: 24 

Review of Site Plan Approval - 12 Rean Drive- Shared Loading and Waste Collection Area
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct the appropriate staff within the City, in commenting upon development applications involving mutual access and servicing arrangements, to ensure that the applicant demonstrate the existence of an agreement providing for the shared access/servicing arrangements and future maintenance of same.

 

2.         Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 21, 2009) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in its entirety as it contains information that is subject to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions.

 

Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 21, 2009) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in its entirety, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains information that is subject to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions.

————
Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the appropriate staff within the City, in commenting upon development applications involving mutual access and servicing arrangements, to ensure that the applicant demonstrate the existence of an agreement providing for the shared access/servicing arrangements and future maintenance of same.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council:

 

1.         Requested representatives from Daniels Corporation to meet with Mr. Craig, representative of TSCC No. 1498, regarding the resolution of the outstanding easement maintenance agreement and advise the Ward Councillor of the outcome of their discussions; and that the Ward Councillor advise the North York Community Council.

Origin
(January 21, 2009) Report from City Solicitor
Summary

Item No. NY22.41, adopted by North York Community Council at its meeting on January 13, 2009, requests the City Solicitor to report to NYCC on February 9, 2009, on the site plan approval process undertaken for the property at 12 Rean Drive and any potential liability to the City for approving the site plan application.  As a condition of their site plan approval, the owner of 12 Rean Drive was required to enter into an easement agreement for a shared loading and waste collection area located on the property at 8 Rean Drive.  An easement right for access to the proposed shared area was registered on title; however an easement agreement containing provisions regarding maintenance and cost sharing was not entered into.

 

The obligation to enter into an easement agreement for shared loading and waste collection was satisfied by the applicant. Technical Services only required access rights to the shared loading and waste collection, and did not require proof of a formal maintenance and cost sharing arrange between the two private property owners.  The confidential attachment to this report comments on whether the City may be subject to any liability for approving the site plan application for 12 Rean Drive without requiring a maintenance or cost sharing agreement.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Review of Site Plan Approval - 12 Rean Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-18972.pdf)

Communication from John Craig on behalf of TSCC #1498, submitted by Councillor Shiner
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-18973.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

John Craig, Past President, TSCC #1498


28a Response to TSCC #1498 Questions - Shared Loading and Waste Collection Area - 12 Rean Drive
Origin
(March 9, 2009) Report from City Solicitor
Summary

Item No. NY23.28, adopted by North York Community Council at its meeting on February 9, 2009, requests the City Solicitor to report to NYCC on March 26, 2009, to respond to questions/issues raised by John Craig on behalf of TSCC #1498 that stem from a report from the City Solicitor to NYCC dated January 21, 2009 (the “City Solicitor Report”).  The purpose of the City Solicitor Report was to review the site plan approval process undertaken for the property at 12 Rean Drive , and comment on any potential liability to the City for approving the site plan application. The current report responds to the six specific questions/issues posed by Mr. Craig in his communication entitled Rean Drive-Shared Loading and Waste Collection Area - Additional Issues to be addressed by City Solicitor, dated February 4, 2009 (the TSCC #1498 Memo”).

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Response to TSCC #1498 Questions - 12 Rean Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19467.pdf)


NY24.31

 

Amended 

 

 

378 Steeles Avenue East in the Town of Markham
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct that the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan, for the application regarding 378 Steeles Avenue East, in the Town of Markham, and other similar applications in the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan, be required to:

 

a.         forward copies of preliminary planning reports to the North York Community Council at the time they are tabled at the Town of Markham and City of Vaughan Councils;

 

b.         include properties in the City of Toronto which are located within the North York Community Council boundary area in the statutory circulation area for the development; and

 

c.         notify the City of Toronto and corresponding local City of Toronto Councillor(s) of the details of any community meetings being held to discuss the relevant application.

 

2.         City Council direct the Community Planning, North York District staff to discuss this matter with the Town of Markham and City of Vaughan staff with a view of developing a common protocol for handling all development applications in both municipalities within 300 metres of Steeles Avenue and report back to the May 14, 2009 meeting.

 

3.         The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, be requested to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on broader policy issues raised by this Item respecting planning protocols with bordering municipalities.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan, for the application regarding 378 Steeles Avenue East, in the Town of Markham, and other similar applications in the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan, be required to:

 

a.         forward copies of preliminary planning reports to the North York Community Council at the time they are tabled at the Town of Markham and City of Vaughan Councils;

 

b.         include properties in the City of Toronto which are located within the North York Community Council boundary area in the statutory circulation area for the development; and

 

c.         notify the City of Toronto and corresponding local City of Toronto Councillor(s) of the details of any community meetings being held to discuss the relevant application.

 

2.         City Council direct the Community Planning, North York District staff to discuss this matter with the Town of Markham and City of Vaughan staff with a view of developing a common protocol for handling all development applications in both municipalities within 300 metres of Steeles Avenue and report back to the May 14, 2009 meeting.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council:

 

1.         Requested the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to report to the North York Community Council meeting on May 14, 2009 on the existing protocol followed by the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan with respect to notification to the City of Toronto for development applications that are in the Town of Markham and the City of Vaughan and abut the North York Community Council area.

Origin
(March 9, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District
Summary

This report provides information on an application in the Town of Markham for zoning amendment and site plan approval to permit a place of worship in an existing house as well as build an addition to the dwelling.  The Town of Markham has circulated the application to the City of Toronto for comments as the site abuts the municipal boundary (Steeles Avenue East).

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report & Attachments 1-2 - Rezoning - 378 Steeles Avenue East, Markham
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19524.pdf)


NY24.32

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 23 

Final Report - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - 65 and 67 Finch Avenue West
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council be advised, in accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (March 2, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, including the following additional condition to Attachment 2:

 

“(5)      The declaration shall contain a clause providing that in the event of the redevelopment of 63, 61, 59 and 57 Finch Avenue West, the owners of 65 and 67 Finch Avenue West shall make best efforts to put in place reciprocal agreements with the neighbouring properties to allow the continuation of the rear driveway easterly to Elmview Avenue to permit usage of the driveway in either direction for all abutting landowners and to ensure that the costs for maintenance and repair of the driveway are shared”;

 

which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and that such By-law shall expire two years after it has been enacted.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill provided that prior to the introduction of the Bill:

 

a.         the owner provides proof of payment to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor of all tax arrears and current property taxes for the subject site; and

 

b.         the owner of the subject lands has registered, satisfactory to the City Solicitor, a Section 118 restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or mortgage any part of the lands without the prior written consent of the Chief Planner or designate.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 restriction at such time as the Common Elements Condominium Plan has been registered.

————
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council be advised, in accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (March 2, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, including the following additional condition to Attachment 2:

 

“(5)      The declaration shall contain a clause providing that in the event of the redevelopment of 63, 61, 59 and 57 Finch Avenue West, the owners of 65 and 67 Finch Avenue West shall make best efforts to put in place reciprocal agreements with the neighbouring properties to allow the continuation of the rear driveway easterly to Elmview Avenue to permit usage of the driveway in either direction for all abutting landowners and to ensure that the costs for maintenance and repair of the driveway are shared”;

 

which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and that such By-law shall expire two years after it has been enacted.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill provided that prior to the introduction of the Bill:

 

a.         the owner provides proof of payment to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor of all tax arrears and current property taxes for the subject site; and

 

b.         the owner of the subject lands has registered, satisfactory to the City Solicitor, a Section 118 restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or mortgage any part of the lands without the prior written consent of the Chief Planner or designate.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 restriction at such time as the Common Elements Condominium Plan has been registered.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 26, 2009, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin
(March 2, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District
Summary

These applications were made on February 4, 2009 and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. The new provisions for Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium require that a public meeting be held.

 

The application for a common elements condominium proposes a common driveway on lands known municipally as 65 and 67 Finch Avenue West, located at the southeast corner of the intersection with Madeline Road. The common elements condominium is required to provide legal vehicular access to seven, 4-storey residential townhouse units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the driveway by the condominium corporation.

 

The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required in order to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the seven, 4-storey residential townhouses along Finch Avenue West and two 3-storey single family dwellings along Madeline Road.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and approval of the application for Part Lot Control exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or designate.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report & Attachments 1-3 - 65 & 67 Finch Avenue West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19439.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Bernard Feintuch, Barrister and Solicitor, on behalf of the applicant


NY24.33

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 23 

Request for Direction Report - Site Plan Applications - 182-184 Norton Avenue
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.          City Council not support the Site Plan Applications for 182-184 Norton Avenue, that they direct the City Solicitor to appear in opposition of the applications and hire an outside planning consulting to provide expert evidence.

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council not support the Site Plan Applications for 182-184 Norton Avenue, and that they direct the City Solicitor to appear in opposition of the applications and hire an outside planning consultant to provide expert evidence.

Origin
(March 10, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District
Summary

These applications were made on August 28, 2008 and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

The applicant proposes to create three new lots fronting onto Longmore Street from the 2 lots at 182-184 Norton Avenue.  The applicant has applied for consent and for minor variances to the Zoning By-law in order to facilitate the development.  The consents and variances were approved by the Committee of Adjustment at its hearing of December 3, 2008, but appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by the neighbouring property owner.  This report deals with the Site Plan for the proposed three Single Detached Dwellings. The Site Plan Control applications have also been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board for Council’s failure to grant its approval within the required time limits. 

 

This report recommends approval of the Site Plan Applications subject to the conditions listed in Attachments 6, 7 and 8.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report & Attachments 1-8 - 182-184 Norton Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19534.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Adam Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer & Karol, Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of the applicant


NY24.34

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34 

Zoning Amendments to Repeal Bylaws That Regulate Reverse Slope Driveways in the North York Community Council District Boundary
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council enact the Zoning By-law Amendment for the repeal of the bylaws regulating reverse slope driveways in the zoning by-laws of the former Cities of Toronto, North York, York, East York (Township and Leaside by-laws) as they may apply to the district boundary of the North York Community Council substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law identified as Attachment No. 1 to the report (March 10, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the text of the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.

City Council Decision Advice and Other Information

City Council considered this Item together with Item NY24.35, headed "Zoning Amendments to Regulate Reverse Slope Driveways in the North York Community Council District Boundary".

————
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the Zoning By-law Amendment for the repeal of the bylaws regulating reverse slope driveways in the zoning by-laws of the former Cities of Toronto, North York, York, East York (Township and Leaside by-laws) as they may apply to the district boundary of the North York Community Council substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law identified as Attachment No. 1 to the report (March 10, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

                       

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the text of the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 26, 2009, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin
(March 10, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District
Summary

The flooding of basements in grade-related houses has been a growing problem. A contributing factor to some basement flooding is when driveways lead downward into garages located in the lower level of houses, which is currently permitted in the zoning by-laws applying to the North York Community Council jurisdictional area. On January 27 and 28, 2009, City Council enacted five zoning by-law amendments, Nos. 98-2009, 99-2009, 100-2009, 101-2009 and 102-2009, corresponding to the boundaries of the North York Community Council that restrict the as-of-right permission to develop reverse slope driveways.

 

On February 23, 24 and 25, 2009, City Council requested a report regarding bylaws to repeal these bylaws. This report recommends passing the attached zoning amendment which will repeal the provisions previously adopted restricting reverse slope driveways. An accompanying report recommends bylaws to re-establish the restrictions on Reverse Slope Driveways to be passed by City Council at a later date.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report & Draft By-law Attachment - Repeal of By-laws - Reverse Slope Driveways
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19574.pdf)

Proposal to Repeal - Public Hearing Notice - March 26, 2009
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19575.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Letter from City Clerk - MM31.8
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19576.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - City Council Decision - NY22.34
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19577.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Public Hearing Notice - January 13, 2009
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19578.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Staff Report & Attachments 1-5 - NY22.34
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19579.pdf)

Local Measures to Reduce Basement Flooding - Letter from City Clerk - NY20.47
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19580.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - City Council Decision on PG20.5
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19581.pdf)

Local Measures to Reduce Basement Flooding - Letter from City Clerk To City Council
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19582.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Letter from City Clerk - PG20.5
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19583.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Staff Report to Planning & Growth Management Committee
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19584.pdf)

Local Measures to Reduce Basement Flooding - Letter from City Clerk - NY18.53
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19585.pdf)

Local Measures to Reduce Basement Flooding - City Council Decision - NY18.53
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19586.pdf)

Local Measures to Reduce Basement Flooding - Member Motion - NY18.53
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19587.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(December 30, 2008) fax from Donald W. Kerr, LL.B (NY.Main.NY24.34.1)
(January 11, 2009) e-mail from A.A. (Sandy) Robertson, President, Bayview Cummer Neighbourhood Association (NY.Main.NY24.34.2)
(January 13, 2009) fax from Adam J. Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer & Karol, Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of various property owners (NY.Main.NY24.34.3)
(March 13, 2009) fax from Stacie R. Pollack (NY.New.NY24.34.4)
(March 11, 2009) fax from Sergei Kulia (NY.New.NY24.34.5)
(March 11, 2009) fax from Mansour Arabi (NY.New.NY24.34.6)
(March 17, 2009) fax from Adam J. Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer & Karol, Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of property owners of 340 and 342 Brooke Avenue (NY.New.NY24.34.7)
(March 18, 2009) e-mail from Tony Evangelista, In Roads Planning Consultants, on behalf of Luxor Homes (NY.New.NY24.34.8)
(March 17, 2009) fax from Glenn Rubinoff, President, Rubinoff Design Group (NY.New.NY24.34.9)
(March 17, 2009) fax from Mike Dias (NY.New.NY24.34.10)
(March 18, 2009) e-mail from Alexandra Lewin (NY.New.NY24.34.11)
(March 17, 2009) fax from S. Tavone (NY.New.NY24.34.12)
(March 19, 2009) e-mail from Riccardo and Fatima Albanese (NY.New.NY24.34.13)
(March 20, 2009) fax from Andrew Gallici (NY.New.NY24.34.14)
(March 24, 2009) fax from Layla Sabet (NY.New.NY24.34.15)
(March 24, 2009) letter from Tamara Malozewski (NY.New.NY24.34.16)
(March 24, 2009) fax from Surur Akbarzadeh (NY.New.NY24.34.17)
(March 24, 2009) fax from Farshid Fathibitaraf, Pinelake Group (NY.New.NY24.34.18)
(March 11, 2009) fax from Anthony Zuccarini (NY.New.NY24.34.19)
(March 25, 2009) e-mail from Andrew Cassel, Falconwin Group (NY.New.NY24.34.20)
(March 25, 2009) fax from Andrew Cassel, 401704 Ontario Limited (NY.New.NY24.34.21)
(March 26, 2009) submission from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers & Solicitors (NY.New.NY24.34.22)
(March 26, 2009) submission from Irene Antunes and Luis Ganhao, forwarding a petition containing signatures of four (4) property owners on Glen Park Avenue (NY.New.NY24.34.23)
Speakers (Committee)

Ray Carnavale
Abbas Jannat
Patrick Larkin
Adam J. Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer & Karol, Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of various property owners (Submission Filed)
Riccardo Albanese
Glenn Rubinoff, President, Rubinoff Design Group
Irene Antunes (Submission Filed)
Vito Tamma
Tony Siesto, Old Orchard Homes
Nick  Saccone
Surur Akbarzadeh, Pinelake Group
Farshid Fathibitaraf
Loris Rossit
Suzanna Goldstein
Richard Idels, Idels Architect Inc.
Sarah Ifrah, Sarah Ifrah Architect
Jeremy Jacobs
Andrej Zdravicovic
Spiros Grigoriadis


34a Sewers By-law Consistent with Zoning Prohibition of Reverse Slope Driveways
Origin
(March 24, 2009) Report from General Manager, Toronto Water
Summary

On January 13, 2009, The North York Community Council requested the General Manager Toronto Water, report back on whether there are any necessary amendments required to Municipal Code Chapter 681– Sewers (Sewers By-law) to ensure it is consistent with the Zoning By-law amendments restricting reverse slope driveways in the North York District. The Sewers By-law does not regulate how a property is to be developed but controls how it is to be drained by defining the specifications and criteria on how flows from private properties are to be accommodated. The By-law defines how service connections are to be made to the City‘s sewer system and regulates the quality and quantity flows discharged to the system, including specifying how storm runoff is to be addressed to minimize the impacts that could cause flooding.

 

Toronto Water staff has reviewed the By-law and advises that there are no amendments required to the Sewers By-law to ensure it is consistent with the banning of reverse slope driveways.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Sewers By-law
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19890.pdf)


NY24.35

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34 

Zoning Amendments to Regulate Reverse Slope Driveways in the North York Community Council District Boundary
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council enact the Zoning By-law Amendments for regulating reverse slope driveways in the zoning by-laws of the former Cities of Toronto, North York, York, East York (Township and Leaside by-laws) as they may apply to the district boundary of the North York Community Council substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-laws identified as Attachment No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the report (March 10, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the text of the draft zoning by-law amendments as may be required.

 

3.         City Council direct that December 1, 2009 be the date upon which Attachment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the report (March 10, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, should be enacted by City Council.

 

4.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report to North York Community Council, prior to December 1, 2009, on what further amendments may be necessary to accommodate a prohibition on below-grade garages.

 

5.         City Council direct that notice of the effective date of the by-laws be posted on the City website and in the Toronto Building Division and City Planning Division, where applications are received for below-grade garages.

City Council Decision Advice and Other Information

City Council considered this Item together with Item NY24.34, headed "Zoning Amendments to Repeal Bylaws That Regulate Reverse Slope Driveways in the North York Community Council District Boundary".

————
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the Zoning By-law Amendments for regulating reverse slope driveways in the zoning by-laws of the former Cities of Toronto, North York, York, East York (Township and Leaside by-laws) as they may apply to the district boundary of the North York Community Council substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-laws identified as Attachment No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the report (March 10, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

                       

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the text of the draft zoning by-law amendments as may be required.

 

3.         City Council direct that December 1, 2009 be the date upon which Attachment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the report (March 10, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, should be enacted by City Council.

 

4.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report to North York Community Council, prior to December 1, 2009, on what further amendments may be necessary to accommodate a prohibition on below-grade garages.

 

5.         City Council direct that notice of the effective date of the by-laws be posted on the City website and in the Toronto Building Division and City Planning Division, where applications are received for below-grade garages.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 26, 2009, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

North York Community Council:

 

1.         Requested the City Solicitor to report directly to City Council, for its meeting on April 6, 2009, on the feasibility of registering on title a warning clause advising of the dangers posed by below grade garages and absolving the City of Toronto of any liability with regard to the installation of a below grade garage.

 

2.         Referred the communication (March 26, 2009) from Mr. Adam J. Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer, Karol, to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, in order to submit a report directly to City Council, for its meeting on April 6, 2009, on the comments in the communication.

Origin
(March 10, 2009) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District
Summary

The flooding of basements in grade-related houses has been a growing problem. A contributing factor to some basement flooding is when driveways lead downward into garages located in the lower level of houses, which is currently permitted in the zoning bylaws applying to the North York Community Council jurisdictional area. On January 27 and 28, 2009, City Council enacted five zoning by-law amendments corresponding to the boundaries of the North York Community Council that restrict the as-of-right permission to develop reverse slope driveways.

 

On February 23, 24 and 25, 2009, City Council requested a report regarding bylaws to repeal these bylaws, which is the subject of an accompanying report, and a report on bylaws to re-establish the restrictions on Reverse Slope Driveways. This report responds to the latter request by recommending that the attached draft zoning bylaw amendments be passed by City Council at a later date.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report & Attachments 1-5 - Request to Amend By-laws - Reverse Slope Driveways
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19588.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Public Hearing Notice - March 26, 2009
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19589.pdf)

Reverse Slope Driveways - Letter from City Clerk - MM31.8
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19590.pdf)

Background Information (City Council)
(April 3, 2009) supplementary report from the City Solicitor (NY24.35b)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-20256.pdf)

(April 3, 2009) supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor (NY24.35c)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-20257.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(March 13, 2009) fax from Stacie R. Pollack (NY.New.NY24.35.1)
(March 11, 2009) fax from Sergai Kulia (NY.New.NY24.35.2)
(March 12, 2009) e-mail from Lorne Rose (NY.New.NY24.35.3)
(March 11, 2009) fax from Mansour Arabi (NY.New.NY24.35.4)
(March 17, 2009) fax from Adam J. Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer & Karol, Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of property owners of 340 and 342 Brooke Avenue (NY.New.NY24.35.5)
(March 17, 2009) fax from Glenn Rubinoff, President, Rubinoff Design Group (NY.New.NY24.35.6)
(March 17, 2009) fax from Mike Dias (NY.New.NY24.35.7)
(March 18, 2009) e-mail from Alexandra Lewin (NY.New.NY24.35.8)
(March 17, 2009) fax from S. Tavone (NY.New.NY24.35.9)
(March 19, 2009) e-mail from Riccardo and Fatima Albanese (NY.New.NY24.35.10)
(March 20, 2009) fax from Andrew Gallici (NY.New.NY24.35.11)
(March 24, 2009) fax from Layla Sabet (NY.New.NY24.35.12)
(March 24, 2009) letter from Tamara Malozewski (NY.New.NY24.35.13)
(March 24, 2009) fax from Surur Akbarzadeh (NY.New.NY24.35.14)
(March 24, 2009) fax from Farshid Fathibitaraf, Pinelake Group (NY.New.NY24.35.15)
(March 11, 2009) fax from Anthony Zuccarini (NY.New.NY24.35.16)
(March 25, 2009) e-mail from Andrew Cassel, Falconwin Group (NY.New.NY24.35.17)
(March 25, 2009) fax from Andrew Cassel, 401704 Ontario Limited (NY.New.NY24.35.18)
(March 26, 2009) submission from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers & Solicitors (NY.New.NY24.35.19)
(March 26, 2009) submission from Irene Antunes and Luis Ganhao, forwarding a petition containing signatures of four (4) property owners on Glen Park Avenue  (NY.New.NY24.35.20)
Speakers (Committee)

Ray Carnavale
Abbas Jannat
Patrick Larkin
Adam J. Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer & Karol Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of various property owners (Submission Filed)
Riccardo Albanese
Glenn Rubinoff, Rubinoff Design Group
Irene Antunes (Submission Filed)
Vito Tamma
Tony Siesto, Old Orchard Homes
Nick Saccone
Surur Akbarzadeh, Pine Lake Group
Farshid Fathibitaraf
Loris Rossit
Suzanna Goldstein
Richard Idels, Idels Architect Inc.
Sarah Ifrah, Sarah Ifrah Architect
Jeremy Jacobs
Andrej Zdravicovic
Spiros Grigoriadis


35a Sewers By-law Consistent with Zoning Prohibition of Reverse Slope Driveways
Origin
(March 24, 2009) Report from General Manager, Toronto Water
Summary

On January 13, 2009, The North York Community Council requested the General Manager Toronto Water, report back on whether there are any necessary amendments required to Municipal Code Chapter 681– Sewers (Sewers By-law) to ensure it is consistent with the Zoning By-law amendments restricting reverse slope driveways in the North York District. The Sewers By-law does not regulate how a property is to be developed but controls how it is to be drained by defining the specifications and criteria on how flows from private properties are to be accommodated. The By-law defines how service connections are to be made to the City‘s sewer system and regulates the quality and quantity flows discharged to the system, including specifying how storm runoff is to be addressed to minimize the impacts that could cause flooding. 

 

Toronto Water staff has reviewed the By-law and advises that there are no amendments required to the Sewers By-law to ensure it is consistent with the banning of reverse slope driveways.

Background Information (Committee)
Staff Report - Sewer By-law
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19891.pdf)


NY24.36

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 25 

Decision of the Agnes Macphail Award Selection Committee - Recipient of the 2009 Agnes Macphail Award
City Council Decision

City Council on April 6, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council approve Patricia Moore as the recipient of the 2009 Agnes Macphail Award.

City Council Decision Advice and Other Information

City Council considered this Item together with Item TE24.117, headed "Decision of the Agnes Macphail Award Selection Committee - Recipient of the 2009 Agnes Macphail Award".

————
Committee Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve Patricia Moore as the recipient of the 2009 Agnes Macphail Award.

Origin
(March 19, 2009) Letter from Jay Thiessen, Administrative Support, Agnes Macphail Recognition Committee
Summary

Advising that the Agnes Macphail Award Selection Committee met, as established in the selection process, on February 9, 2009, to examine the nominations received and to select the recipient of the 2009 Agnes Macphail Award.

Background Information (Committee)
Letter from the Agnes Macphail Award Selection Committee
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-19926.pdf)


Submitted Thursday, March 26, 2009
Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair, North York Community Council