Decision Document |
|
Planning and Growth Management Committee |
Meeting No. | 25 | Contact | Merle MacDonald, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Wednesday, May 6, 2009 |
Phone | 416-392-7340 | |
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
pgmc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Committee Room 1, City Hall
|
Chair | Councillor Norman Kelly |
PG25.1 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
|
GO Transit 10 Year Plan |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that City Council request GO Transit to accelerate its plans for electrification of its rail network, particularly the Georgetown line. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
Mr. Gary McNeil, Managing Director, GO Transit, gave a presentation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on GO Transit 10 Year Plan. |
Summary |
Presentation by Gary McNeil, Managing Director, GO Transit |
PG25.2 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
City-Wide Official Plan Amendment Regarding the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft official plan amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (April 24, 2009) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft official plan amendment as may be required.
|
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to meet with representatives of Home Depot and report directly to Council on the results of the meeting.
The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a public meeting on May 6, 2009, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(April 17, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
On June 16, 2006 the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe came into effect under the authority of the Places to Grow Act, 2005 (the Act). Under the Act, municipalities within the Greater Golden Horseshoe are required to bring their respective Official Plans into conformity with the Growth Plan by June 2009. In order to bring the Official Plan into conformity with the Growth Plan an Official Plan Amendment is required to address the areas of non-conformity identified by the Province.
This report recommends an amendment to the Official Plan to bring the Official Plan into conformity with the Provincial Growth Plan. |
Background Information |
Growth Plan for Greater Golden Horseshoe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20553.pdf) |
Communications |
(May 4, 2009) letter from Rick Pennycooke, President, The Lakeshore Group (PG.New.PG25.2.1) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from Mark R. Flowers, Davies Howe Partners (PG.New.PG25.2.2) |
2a | Supplementary Report: City – Wide Official Plan Amendment Regarding the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe |
Origin |
(April 24, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
This report proposes revisions to the draft official plan amendment presented in the report dated April 17, 2009 regarding the Official Plan's conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The proposed revisions are minor in nature and are in response to verbal comments received April 23, 2009 from Provincial staff of the Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Housing and Energy and Infrastructure.
This report recommends revisions to the proposed Official Plan amendment to bring the Official Plan into conformity with the Provincial Growth Plan. |
Background Information |
Supp Report Growth Plan for Greater Golden Horseshoe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20865.pdf) |
(Deferred from April 14, 2009 - 2009.PG24.2) |
PG25.3 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
By-law to Require and Govern the Construction of Green Roofs in Toronto |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. the Draft By-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning dated March 27, 2009 be amended to provide that:
a. industrial buildings are required to include a green roof equal to 10% of the available roof space to a maximum of 2,000m2 to become effective as ofJanuary 31, 2011;
b. non-profit housing is subject to the same requirements as other residential buildings governed by the proposed by-law;
c. separate and public schools are subject to the same requirements as non-residential buildings;
d. coverage and threshold requirements include new developments with a gross floor area between 2,000m2 and 4,999m2 which would be required to provide a minimum coverage of 20% of the available roof space;
e. minimum height requirements for residential buildings include new developments with a height greater than 6 storeys or 20 metres;
f. the exemption for non-vegetative border from the calculation of available roof space is removed.
2. City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code substantially in accordance with the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the Chief Building Official and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning dated March 27, 2009, as amended by Recommendation 1 above, to require the construction of green roofs, such amendment to come into effect on January 31, 2010;
3. City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code substantially in accordance with the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the Chief Building Official and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning dated March 27, 2009, as amended by Recommendation 1 above, to govern the construction of green roofs, such amendment to come into effect on January 31, 2010.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-law as may be required, in consultation with the Chief Planner and the Chief Building Official.
5. City Council delegate authority to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to approve variances to the Green Roof By-law.
6. City Council authorize that cash in-lieu of a green roof required under the Green Roof By-law be directed to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program to be used to green roofs on existing buildings.
7. City Council request the Province to amend the regulation under the Building Code Act, 1992 to include as applicable law a by-law made under section 108 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and that the Province make such amendment prior to January 31, 2010 when the by-law contemplated in the report from the Chief Building Official and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning dated March 27, 2009, as amended by Recommendation 1 above, will come into effect.
8. City Council request that the Province provide additional money under the funding formula for the construction of new schools in Toronto.
9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to undertake a review of the Toronto Green Roof By-law by January 31, 2012.
10. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to bring forward any proposed technical updates to the Toronto Green Roof Construction Standard following the American National Standards Institute adoption of fire and wind uplift standards and after consultation with the Technical Advisory Group.
11. City Council adopt amendments to Chapter 363 of the Municipal Code to clarify that the building permit classification “Re-Roofing with structural work, raise roof structure” would also apply to stand alone modifications to create a green roof, such amendment to come into effect upon adoption of the Toronto Green Roof By-law.
12. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, to report solely and before the effective date of the industrial building requirement on an alternate option that would fulfil:
a. the reduction of the urban heat island effect; b. the reduction of Green House Gas emissions; and c. help with bio-diversity functions/corridors
13. City Council authorize the City Solicitor be authorized to introduce the necessary Bill in Council to give effect thereto.
|
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the following reports directly to Council:
1. the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on:
a. the motion by Councillor Vaughan, that all new flat roof garages, regardless of the gross floor area of the garage, be required to have a green roof;
b. the motion by Councillor Vaughan, that rooftop greenhouses on schools, residential properties and retail complexes, be exempted from the determination of available roof space, when and only if the greenhouses employ rain harvesting technology;
c. the motion by Councillor Milczyn, that the grandfathering/transition criteria of the draft by-law be amended to add as an exemption from the draft by-law any project that has submitted a complete site plan application by January 31, 2010.
d. amending the Zoning By-law to permit roof top amenity space in tall residential buildings to be included as a credit in the calculation under the Green Roof draft by-law, the report also to address the maximum percentage of green roof top coverage achievable in tall residential buildings;
e. a more detailed explanation on how the green roof requirement will be calculated, having regard for the public presentations and communications,
2. the Chief Planner, in consultation with appropriate staff, on how to define food processing areas and whether they should be partially or fully excluded;
3. the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director,Toronto Building on:
i. a policy that would allow for multiple property owners to retrofit established roofs with solar panels and reflective material as an offset for new projects;
ii. a provision that would allow for heritage building sites to be exempt from the policy in exchange for a preservation strategy for the listed or designated portion of the project and a commitment to construct a reflective roof on new elements of the proposal;
iii. a right to sunlight and/or compensation for roofs that comply with policy;
4. the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building , in consultation with the Fire Chief, on safety issues related to green roofs;
5. the City Solicitor and the Medical Officer of Health on whether Canadian and U.S. Food Safety Regulations are compatible with the proposed by-law as it would relate to industrial buildings that house food handling, food storage or food manufacturing.
|
Origin |
(March 27, 2009) Report from Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
This report recommends that consideration of the Green Roof By-law be deferred to a public meeting scheduled for the May 6, 2009 meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee.
The proposed Toronto Green Roof By-law, enacted under the authority of Section 108 of the City of Toronto Act (COTA) requires green roofs on certain types of new buildings and regulates the design and construction of green roofs in Toronto. Toronto will become the only city in North America with a By-law that both requires green roofs and establishes the construction standards for them.
In October 2008, Toronto Building and City Planning reported on a draft proposal to require green roofs and to provide design requirements for green roofs and recommended a focused public consultation. This report provides an update on the public consultations that took place in November and December 2008 and February 2009. The results of the consultation process are reflected in the content of the draft Green Roof By-law for the City of Toronto and the proposed recommendations for consideration in this report. |
Background Information |
Construction of Green Roofs (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20562.pdf) Attach 1 Green Roofs (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20563.pdf) Attach 2 Green Roofs (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20564.pdf) |
Communications |
(April 13, 2009) e-mail from Paula J. Tenuta, MCIP, RPP, Drector, Municipal Government Relations (PG.Main.PG25.3.1) (April 13, 2009) e-mail from Steven W. Peck, President, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities - North America Inc. (PG.Main.PG25.3.2) (April 29, 2009) e-mail from Patrick Berne, Pemberton Group (PG.Main.PG25.3.3) (April 29, 2009) e-mail from Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Ltd. (PG.Main.PG25.3.4) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from Paula J. Tenuta, BILD (PG.New.PG25.3.5) (May 3, 2009) e-mail from Larry Brydon, Chair, Greater Toronto Chapter of the Canada Green Building Council, Co-Chair, BILD Green Committee (PG.New.PG25.3.6) (May 5, 2009) submission from Marshall Leslie (PG.New.PG25.3.7) (May 4, 2009) submission from Karen K.Y. Liu, Director of Research and Development, Xero Flor International (PG.New.PG25.3.8) (May 4, 2009) e-mail from Joy Schmidt, Xero Flor Canada Ltd. (PG.New.PG25.3.9) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from David A. McKay, PHBC Planning (PG.New.PG25.3.10) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from Stephen Upton, Tridel Builders Inc. (PG.New.PG25.3.11) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from Stephen Diamond, Diamondcorp, Managers of the Whitecastle New Urban Fund (PG.New.PG25.3.12) (May 6, 2009) e-mail from Camila Troughton and Karen Whitehorn, Co-producers, Raising the Green Roof, 2008 (PG.New.PG25.3.13) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from Jeff Miller, Vice-President, ProLogis (PG.New.PG25.3.14) (May 5, 2009) e-mail from Blair Wolk, Director of Development, Orlando Corporation (PG.New.PG25.3.15) (May 6, 2009) submission from Paul H. Martin, Del Equipment Limited (PG.New.PG25.3.16) (May 6, 2009) submission from Neil Pattison, Manager of Development, The Daniels Corporation (PG.New.PG25.3.17) (May 6, 2009) submission from Paul H. Scrivener, The Toronto Industry Network (PG.New.PG25.3.18) (May 6, 2009) submission from Gil Galang, Sanofi Pasteur (PG.New.PG23.3.19) (May 6, 2009) submission from Michael J. Wren, Miller Thomson LLP (PG.New.PG25.3.20) (May 6, 2009) e-mail from Chris Sherriff-Scott, Senior Vice-President, Minto (PG.New.PG25.3.21) (May 6, 2009) e-mail from Jude Tersigni, Manager, Planning, Menkes Developments Ltd. (PG.New.PG25.3.22) (March 13, 2009) submission from Kim McKinnon, Vice President Ontario, Canadian Council of Grocery Distributors (PG.New.PG25.3.23) (May 6, 2009) submission from Al Brezina, Manager-Commercialization, Campbell Company of Canada (PG.New.PG25.3.24) |
3a | Supplementary report: Green Roof By-law Communications |
Origin |
(April 22, 2009) Report from Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
In considering the March 27, 2009 report "Toronto Green Roof By-law" at its meeting of April 14, 2009, the Planning and Growth Management Committee directed the Chief Planner and Chief Building Official to consider and report on all written communications received on the Green Roof By-law at its meeting including the letter from the Deputy Mayor.
The revisions to the By-law proposed in reviewing this supplementary report would expand the scope of the draft Green Roof By-law to include a greater number of smaller developments city-wide. The recommendations considered include: removal of all exemptions for industrial, school and non-profit housing use buildings; separate requirements for green roofs on industrial buildings; and the decrease of the gross floor area (GFA) threshold to include smaller development. |
Background Information |
Green Roof By-law Supplementary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20605.pdf) |
3b | By-law to Require and Govern the Construction of Green Roofs in Toronto |
Origin |
(April 8, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Joe Pantalone, Deputy Mayor, City of Toronto |
Summary |
Requesting that the Planning and Growth Management Committee consider and adopt the recommendations in the Member Motion. |
Background Information |
Member Motion from Deputy Mayor Pantalone (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-21062.pdf) |
3c | Motions re Green Roof Report |
Origin |
(May 6, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Joe Pantalone, Deputy Mayor, City of Toronto |
Summary |
Forwarding amendments to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. |
Background Information |
Member motion from Councillor Pantalone (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-21093.pdf) |
PG25.4 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Settlement of Appeal of Official Plan Amendment No. 38, Authorizing Section 37 Funding of Heritage Conservation District Studies |
Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 of the report (April 17, 2009) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions in Attachment 1, at the end of the Council meeting.
|
Origin |
(April 17, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor |
Summary |
This report recommends modifications to Official Plan Amendment (OPA) No. 38, which authorized the funding of Heritage Conservation District studies as an eligible community benefit under Section 37 of the Planning Act. Approval of these modifications would facilitate a settlement of the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) of the OPA by the Building Industry and Land Development (BILD) Association.
If Council adopts the recommended modifications as set out in confidential Attachment 1 to this report, they would be presented by the City Solicitor to the OMB to settle the appeal. |
Background Information |
Settlement of Appeal Section 37 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20603.pdf) |
PG25.5 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 25, 26, 34 |
Official Plan Amendment for Don Mills Road and Overlea Boulevard – Map 3 Right-of-Way – Request for Direction |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee directed:
1. staff to prepare an Official Plan Amendment to amend Map 3 to designate the planned right-of-way to 36 metres for Don Mills Road from Kern Road to Overlea Boulevard and Overlea Boulevard from Don Mills Road to Millwood Road.
2. that notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act and to be brought forward with the results of the Transit Project Assessment Process for the Don Mills LRT project to the same meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee.
|
Origin |
(April 20, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
On March 21, 2007, the Toronto Transit Commission endorsed a light rail transit plan for the City of Toronto which included seven projects across the City. Amongst them was the Don Mills route from Steeles Avenue to Bloor/Danforth subway. A preliminary planning study is currently underway that will lead to a Transit Project Assessment Process for the project.
The City's Official Plan Map 3 Right-of-Way Widths Associated with Existing Major Streets designates the right-of-way for segments of Don Mills Road from Kern Road to Barber Greene Road/Greenbelt Drive and Barber Greene Road/Greenbelt Drive to Overlea Boulevard planned for 30 and 33 metres respectively and Overlea Boulevard as 33 metres.
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's authorization for the preparation of a City initiated Official Plan Amendment to amend Map 3 of the Official Plan in order to designate the right-of way for Don Mills Road from Kern Road to Overlea Boulevard and Overlea Boulevard from Don Mills Road to Millwood Road to 36 metres.
The official plan amendment would enable the protection and development of a planned right-of-way for a 36 metre corridor associated with the Don Mills Transit City LRT line. |
Background Information |
Don Mills Rd and Overlea Blvd Map 3 Right of Way (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20551.pdf) |
Communications |
(May 5, 2009) e-mail from Kimberly L. Beckman, Davies Howe Partners (PG.New.PG25.5.1) |
PG25.6 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Delegation of Authority to the Chief Planner |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council enact the By-law at Attachment 1 of the report (April 20, 2009) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor to amend the Municipal Code Chapter 415, Development of Land, to delegate certain powers and authority to the Chief Planner.
|
Origin |
(April 20, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor |
Summary |
In 2000 City Council delegated decision-making authority for certain development applications to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The Chief Planner has exercised the delegated authority successfully. We have identified specific instances where further delegation would result in improved efficiency in processing applications. Substantive decisions on development would remain with City Council.
This report recommends that a new delegation by-law be passed to enhance the Chief Planner's existing delegated authority. |
Background Information |
Delegation of Authority to the Chief Planner (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20565.pdf) |
PG25.7 | Information |
Received |
|
Ward: All |
Official Plan Amendment: Additions to the List of Potential Heritage Conservation District Study Areas Eligible for Section 37 Community Benefit |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee received the item for information. |
Origin |
(April 8, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
The Official Plan was amended in 2008 to allow Section 37 monies to fund heritage conservation districts studies in areas of the City considered to have potential for study as heritage conservation district. As a result, Councillor Howard Moscoe has requested that Heritage Preservation Services (HPS) Staff consider the additional areas of Elia, including Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Parson's archaeological site.
This report provides a desk-top analysis of Elia, including Black Creek Pioneer Village and the Parson's archaeological site. The adoption of this additional area would require an Official Plan Amendment (OPA). This report also outlines three additional areas that require analysis and a plan to include all those new qualifying areas on the map under a single OPA process. |
Background Information |
Section 37 Community Benefit (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20552.pdf) |
(Deferred from April 14, 2009 - 2009.PG24.11) (Referred from City Council on January 27 and 28, 2009 - MM30.7) |
PG25.8 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: All |
Developing a “Made in Toronto” Building Code |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the City Manager to submit a report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the status of negotiations between the City of Toronto and the Province of Ontario on the amendments to the City of Toronto Act relating to the Ontario Building Code. |
Origin |
(January 29, 2009) Member Motion from City Council |
Summary |
Despite the significant legislative independence and latitude gained by the City of Toronto as a result of the new City of Toronto Act, there remain some areas in which the City of Toronto should be able to exercise more autonomy.
One of these areas is the Ontario Building Code. As by far the largest urban area in Ontario, the City of Toronto faces unique challenges and has unique opportunities (such as the opportunities and challenges that result from density) that can only be realized through certain Building Code provisions tailored to Toronto's needs. Greener building standards and code provisions that deal with reducing noise between semi-detached buildings and row houses are just some examples of the many areas that Toronto residents' interests and balancing of priorities may not always align entirely with other municipalities in Ontario.
A mechanism for City Council to amend by by-law or recommend to the Minister, Toronto-specific Building Code amendments and adjustments would be of great benefit for addressing these unique challenges and seizing these opportunities.
(Submitted to City Council on January 27 and 28, 2009 as MM30.7) |
Background Information |
Transmitted from City Council - Referral of Member Motion MM30.7 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20526.pdf) |
PG25.9 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 |
Letter from Scarborough Community Council - Illegal Rooming Houses and Second Suites |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that when Municipal Licensing and Standards has an open file on a suspected rooming house, the address of the property be forwarded to Fire Services for its consideration. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Mangement Committee forwarded to the Executive Committee, the request from Scarborough Community Council that City Council consider a special levy for second suites, as this issue is in the Executive Committee's jurisdiction.
|
Origin |
(March 31, 2009) Letter from Scarborough Community Council |
Summary |
The Scarborough Community Council on March 26, 2009, considered a presentation by the Scarborough Association of Seniors on the issue of illegal rooming houses and renting of second suites in residential dwellings. |
Background Information |
Letter from Scarborough Community Council (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20392.pdf) |
PG25.10 | Information |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Additional Methods to Inform the Public of the Draft New Zoning By-law Consultation Process |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee received the item for information. |
Origin |
(May 1, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
This report discusses the various proposed methods of communicating the consultation phase of the Draft New Zoning By-law. TTC advertising will include an advertisement in subway cars. Posters and pamphlets will be distributed to select City operated facilities including the Toronto Public Libraries where free access to internet-based computers will allow residents to view and comment online. Advertisements will be purchased in community newspapers as well as banner advertising on selected websites will be explored. |
Background Information |
Additional Methods to Inform the Public of the Draft New Zoning By-law Consultation Process (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-21068.pdf) |
PG25.11 | ACTION |
Deferred |
|
|
Provisions for Taxi Stands |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee deferred the item indefinitely. |
Origin |
(April 28, 2009) Letter from Councillor Howard Moscoe, Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence |
Summary |
Request from Councillor Moscoe regarding taxi stands. |
Background Information |
Letter from Councillor Moscoe re Taxi Stands (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-21029.pdf) |
PG25.12 | Decision information not found |
Adopted |
|
|
Review of Employment Areas Policies in the Official Plan |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to:
1. review Employment Area Policy 4.6.1 of the Official Plan with respect to the provision for "restaurants and small scale stores and services that serve area businesses and workers" in order to assess the impact of these provisions on the prime economic function of Employment Areas, and report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee;
2. review Employment Area Policy 4.6.2 of the Official Plan in order to assess the impact of this policy (which permits at certain locations uses such as places of worship, recreation and community colleges) on the prime economic function of Employment Areas, and report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee;
3. review Employment Area Policy 4.6.3 of the Official Plan in order to assess the impact of this policy (which permits at certain locations subject to conditions, major retail uses) on the prime economic function of Employment Areas, and report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee; and
4. report separately on the Liberty Village and South of Eastern Employment Districts. |
Origin |
(May 5, 2009) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Toronto-Danforth Ward 30 |
Summary |
Requesting staff review and report of Employment Areas Policies in the Official Plan. |
Background Information |
Letter from Councillor Fletcher (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-21083.pdf) |
PG25.13 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
|
Reopening of Part 4 of the Decision on Item PG24.1 |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee deleted the words "in the evening of the regular Community Council meeting dates," in Part 4 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee Decision on Item PG24.1, so that Part 4 now reads:
"the Planning and Growth Management Committee hold a public meeting at each of the Civic Centres, to which the Community Council members are to be invited; and that the Chief Planner and Executive Director make available, in print form at the Open Houses and the Planning and Growth Management Committee evening public meetings, as well as on the City's website, a detailed comparison of the provisions of the draft new Zoning By-law in relation to the provisions of the current zoning by-law(s) applicable in each District." |
Origin |
(May 6, 2009) Member Motion from Councillor Norman Kelly, Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt |
Summary |
That the following words in Part 4 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee Decision on Item PG24.1 be deleted: "in the evening of the regular Community Council meeting dates," |
Background Information |
Member Motion from Councillor Kelly (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-21084.pdf) |
Meeting Sessions |
Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
2009-05-06 | Morning | 9:40 AM | 12:30 PM | Public |
2009-05-06 | Afternoon | 1:45 PM | 4:30 PM | Public |
Attendance |
Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
2009-05-06 9:40 AM - 12:30 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Di Giorgio, Filion, Kelly, Milczyn, Thompson, Vaughan Also present (non-members):Mihevc, Nunziata, Pantalone |
2009-05-06 1:45 PM - 4:30 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Di Giorgio, Filion, Kelly, Milczyn, Vaughan Not Present: Thompson Also present (non-members):Pantalone |