The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close a portion of Rees Street as a public highway.

To enact a by-law to permanently close a portion of Rees Street as a public highway and that it be conveyed upon the terms and conditions set out in Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE27.57, as adopted by City Council at its meeting on September 30 and October 1, 2009.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends:

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 11 to the report dated October 22, 2009 from the Director, Policy and Research and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 of the former City of Toronto substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 12.

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

4.         City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines for Bloor Street West between Keele Street and the rail corridor, and Dundas Street West between Glenlake Avenue and Boustead Avenue as provided in Section 6 of the Bloor-Dundas ‘Avenue’ Study - Final Consultant Report dated September 2009, attached as Attachment No. 9.

5.         City Council request Heritage Preservation Services to review the following properties, 1691 Bloor Street West (Redeemer Lutheran Church), 1573 Bloor Street West (Lithuanian Community House) and 2454, 2466, 2480 Dundas Street West (warehouse buildings), and report back to the Toronto Preservation Board and Toronto and East York Community Council on whether these properties should be included on the City’s Inventory of Heritage Properties. 

6.         City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Community Services and Facilities Assessment set out in Attachment 10.

7.         City Council request Transportation Services and Technical Services to examine the opportunity to improve the public realm at the northwest corner of Roncesvalles Avenue and Boustead Avenue as identified in Section 5.4.3 of the Bloor-Dundas ‘Avenue’ Study - Final Consultant Report dated September 2009, as part of the Roncesvalles Avenue streetscape improvements.

8.         City Council adopt, in principle, the two preferred short-term options for the Bloor Street West Right-of-Way prepared for the Study Area in Attachment No. 7, and request Transportation Services to bring forward an implementation report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.

9.         City Council request Transportation Services to examine the three preferred long-term options for the Bloor Street West Right-of-Way identified in Section 5.4.2.1 of the Bloor-Dundas ‘Avenue’ Study - Final Consultant Report dated September 2009, as part of its study of the feasibility of a bikeway on Bloor Street and Danforth Avenue, as directed by City Council on October 22 and 23, 2007.

10.       City Council request Transportation Services to investigate and consider measures, such as signals, to facilitate pedestrian crossings of Bloor Street West in proximity to Dorval Road.

11.       City Council request Transportation Services to install zebra crosswalk markings at the Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West intersection to facilitate pedestrian movements to the TTC’s Dundas West Station.

12.       City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to examine its directional signage to improve pedestrian movements to the Dundas West and Keele subway stations from the Bloor - Dundas and Bloor - Keele intersections, respectively.

13.       City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to investigate the feasibility of a new entrance to the Dundas West Station on the east side of the Dundas Street West right-of-way as part of any proposed transit improvements in the area.

14.       City Council request Parks, Recreation and Forestry staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to investigate and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on the possibility of entering into an agreement with the Toronto Catholic School Board for greater public recreational use of the playing field at Bishop Marrocco - Thomas Merton Catholic Secondary School.

These City-initiated amendments are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This report recommends approval of amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 438-86, and adoption of Urban Design Guidelines to implement the findings and recommendations of the Bloor-Dundas ‘Avenue’ Study.  The report also provides recommendations and an implementation strategy to help advance the revitalization of Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West within the Study Area.

The proposed zoning by-law amendments are intended to facilitate intensification in a mid-rise form characterized by a defined building base/podium with active at-grade non-residential uses that will strengthen the main street function of Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West.  Proposed built form requirements including setbacks, upper level step-backs and maximum heights are intended to create a balance between new development along the Avenues (Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West) and the adjacent low-rise Neighbourhoods.

The proposed Official Plan Amendment applies to a large block of land on the east side of Dundas Street West, south of Bloor Street West.  The lands are currently occupied by a grocery store and a mix of uses and a large surface parking area.  During the Avenue Study a number of principles of development were identified for these lands.  The proposed amendment brings forward these principles into a Site and Area Specific Policy to guide future development proposals for these lands.

Overall, the recommendations and implementation strategy in this report support the Avenue policies in the Official Plan and build on the findings of the Bloor Street Visioning Initiative adopted by City Council in Spring 2008.  Together they will assist in creating opportunities for new housing and jobs and an improved public realm, all of which will contribute to a more vibrant community in the Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West area.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the report dated October 29, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

3.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, through the Zoning By-law Project, to report to Planning and Growth Management Committee on consideration of amendments to the City-wide By-law regarding restrictions to rear yard and flanking patios.

This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The proposal is to amend the Zoning By-law with respect to implementing additional restrictions on restaurants and related uses on Ossington Avenue, between Queen Street West and Dundas Street West (the study area) in Ward 19.

Staff are recommending a number of amendments to the Zoning By-law which seek to balance the concerns of the residents and the business/property owners.  The cumulative effects of the amendments aim to limit the overall impacts of restaurants and related uses on the adjacent residential area, while still allowing opportunities for new restaurants and related uses to open.

This report reviews and recommends approval of amendments to the Zoning By-law.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment No. 98 attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report dated October 22, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council adopt the draft Bloor Corridor Urban Design Guidelines substantially in accordance with Attachment No. 2 to the report dated October 22, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

4.         If and when the authority to enact inclusionary zoning is granted to the City of Toronto by the Province of Ontario, City Council direct that this study area be immediately included as an area for the standards to apply; and further that this area be considered for a pilot project in conjunction with the Province.

5.         City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps to give effect to the above-noted recommendations.

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Requested the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to report directly to City Council for its meeting on November 30, 2009, on approaches to develop a framework to prioritize affordable housing as a requirement of Section 37 benefits resulting from rezoning in the area.

2.         Referred the letters (November 5 and 6, 2009) from Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP to the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with a request that comments thereon be included in the report to be submitted to City Council for its meeting on November 30, 2009.

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 10, 2009, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

This report presents and recommends approval of a draft Official Plan Amendment to include area-specific policies related to development in the Bloor Corridor, defined as Bloor Street West between Avenue Road and Bathurst Street.  The proposed Official Plan policies are supported by draft Urban Design Guidelines that are also the subject of this report.  These policy documents represent the culmination of the Bloor Corridor Visioning Study, a public consultation process and area study first initiated in 2005.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report dated October 22, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and with the following additional amendment to Section 1(6) of the draft by-law:

               "1(6) a minimum of 5 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the lot."       

2.         City Council determine that no further notice be given in respect of the proposed by-law as amended in accordance with the Supplementary Report dated November 5, 2009.

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

4.         The draft bills not proceed to City Council until a revised landscape plan, which includes addressing sound mitigation, drainage and fencing, and a letter of undertaking to do the work is submitted by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

This application is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes to expand the existing Sunnybrook School building which is a private school located at 469 Merton Street.  The applicant proposes to construct a 2-storey plus basement addition on the adjacent property to the east at 471 Merton Street.  The existing house at 471 Merton Street would be demolished.

While City Planning staff are concerned about the expansion of existing private schools within Neighbourhoods, the City Planning Division considers that this specific private school expansion proposal is satisfactory and is recommending approval given that:

-           The existing building plus the proposed addition will have no significant built-form impact on the adjacent homes.

-           A maximum permitted gross floor area (1,433 m2) of any building(s) on the site has been included in the draft site-specific zoning by-law (refer to Attachment 7) at a floor area that represents the existing building plus the proposed addition.  If the proposed draft by-law is approved and if the current or any future owner of the school wished to add gross floor area beyond the amount of floor area of the existing building plus the addition, a rezoning would be required.  However, Planning staff believe that in its proposed expanded state the school building will be at the maximum size that could be supported on this residential street.

-           The proposed addition is not intended to allow for additional students.  The school’s enrolment has been capped in the draft site-specific zoning by-law at a maximum of 150 full-time students. The school has never had more than 150 students.  Therefore, the school with the proposed addition, operating at or below the enrolment cap, is not expected to generate more traffic on the street.  If the current or any future owner of the school wished to increase its enrolment beyond 150 students, a zoning amendment would be required.  However, Planning staff consider that 150 students is the maximum number that could be supported in a private school on this residential street.

-           The school’s purchase of the property at 471 Merton Street (the portion of the site that would contain the proposed addition) has expanded the curb-side drop-off and pick-up area by approximately 7.5 metres.  The combined area of the existing school frontage plus the newly acquired lot provides frontage that is now able to accommodate up to 5 cars at a time.

This report recommends a change to the number of parking spaces required by the draft by-law which is included as Attachment 7 to the Final Rezoning Report dated October 22, 2009 for 469 and 471 Merton Street (the Sunnybrook School expansion). 

Section 1(6) of the draft by-law specifies a minimum of 6 parking spaces are to be provided whereas given that no parking is to be allowed in the emergency access driveway, (Section 1(7) of the draft by-law), only 5 spaces can be provided.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 492-80, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report dated November 3, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with additional amendments to Section 2(7)(b), so that the section now reads as follows:

“(b)      Parking spaces for use by non-residential owners or occupants and for residential visitor parking shall be provided at the rates prescribed for such uses in section 4(5) of By-law No. 438-86, as amended, after meeting the requirements for residential parking in paragraph (a) of this section, as follows:

(i)         a minimum of 87 parking spaces for use by non-residential owners or occupants of buildings A and B and for residential visitors of buildings A and B on lots A and or on lot B;

(ii)        in the event that the owners of Lots A and B jointly elect to provide dedicated exclusive-use parking for the non-residential components of the project and the residential visitor components of the project in lieu of a shared pool of a minimum of 87 parking spaces, that the allocation of the minimum of 87 parking spaces required for such purposes must also be at the rates prescribed for such uses in Section 4(5) of By-law No. 438-86, as amended and include:

(a)        a minimum of 73 parking spaces of the non-residential owners and occupants and residential visitors of Building A and such spaces to be located on lots A and B or on lot B; and

(b)        a minimum of 14 parking spaces in respect of the non-residential owners or occupants and residential of Building B such spaces to be located on lot A and/or lot B."

2.         City Council determine that no further notice be given in respect of the proposed by-law.

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

This application proposes to amend Site Specific By-law 492-80 to allocate the number and location of existing parking spaces within each parking garage for the various residential and commercial uses at 150 Bloor Street West, 175 Cumberland Street, and 162-164 Cumberland Street.

City Planning, Transportation Services and Buildings staff have reviewed this application based on: the current Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended; current parking standards; a review of the parking space sizes and numbers in the two buildings; and the history of the usage of the parking spaces.  Staff recommend an appropriate distribution of parking space utilization in the two commercially owned garages and, where functional, staff recommend legalizing parking stall sizes, and loading spaces.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application, with City staff modification, to amend Site Specific By-law 492-80. 

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended for the former City of Toronto substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report dated October 16, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required to give effect to the intent of the recommendations contained in this report.

3.         A demolition permit not be issued until a first below grade building permit has been issued for the tower portion and a Heritage Easement Agreement has been signed.

4.         Heritage Preservation Services write a report for consideration by the Toronto Preservation Board, Community and City Council early in 2010 for the demolition of a listed property at 258 Victoria Street.

5.         Prior to the submission of the Bill to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following public benefits:

a.         Prior to the issuance of the first above grade permit, pay to the City the sum of $1,000,000 consisting of $600,000 towards the heritage upgrade of 19-21 Dundas Square (HNR Building) and $400,000 towards capital improvements to O’Keefe Lane and additional street improvements within the immediate area.

b.         Require that the cash amounts identified in a. shall be indexed in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.

c.         Provide a letter of undertaking to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services indicating the applicant's support, as a condition of planning approvals, for the designation and entering into of an HEA for each of the properties at 19 and 21 Dundas Square, the reasons for designation and identification to be based on the Heritage Impact Statement and the Conservation Plan prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated April 14, 2008 and March 24, 2008, respectively;

Although the following matters are not considered to be Section 37 contributions or benefits, they will be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a convenience:

d.         Provide a Detailed Conservation Plan and estimate of costs for the implementation of the Detailed Conservation Plan to be prepared by a qualified heritage architect to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

e.         Retain a consultant archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Culture under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended) to carry out a Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the entire development property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the 2009 Final Draft - Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, Ministry of Culture.

f.          Incorporate significant archaeological resources and findings into the proposed development through either in situ preservation and interpretation where feasible, or commemorated and interpreted through exhibition development on site including, but not limited to, commemorative plaquing.

g.         Ensure no demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the City's Planning Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied.

h.         Prior to the issuance of any building permit for 252-258 Victoria Street including a permit for demolition of the existing buildings, excavation and/or shoring of the subject property the applicant shall:

a.         provide a letter of credit in an form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure the work identified in the detailed Conservation Plan referenced in Recommendation 5.d. above; and

b.         provide building permit drawings including construction specifications for the proposed conservation work prepared by the heritage architect satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

              i.        Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the applicant shall:

a.         complete the conservation work satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

b.         provide a notice of substantial completion prepared by the heritage architect satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

j.          Provide and maintain an irrigation system at the owner’s expense for any proposed trees within the public road allowance, including an automatic timer, designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation auditor (CLIA) and constructed with a back flow preventer to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services.

k.         Provide for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing review, should it be determined that up-grades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the site servicing review accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services.

l.          Improve the laneway from Shuter Street to Dundas Square for access into the site to the satisfaction of Executive Director of Technical Services and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

m.        Incorporate in the construction of the building, and maintain, design and exterior materials satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director.

n.         Provide knock-out panels at the northwest corner of the site on the Dundas Square wall to accommodate a potential future connection to the PATH system, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

o.         Prior to final site plan approval, the owner will:

1.         Submit architectural plans, elevations and landscaping including 1:50 scale elevations to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the owner will be required to, in conjunction with each Site Plan Application, submit 1:50 scale drawings in conformity with this requirement.

2.         Undertake improvement of the street right-of-ways abutting the lot, including streetscaping and tree installation, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division, and the Executive Director, Technical Services Division.

3.         Provide continuous weather protection with a minimum clear depth of three metres on Victoria Street.

4.         Complete a Wind Assessment study and employ the results of the study into the design of the building, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

p.         The Owner shall be encouraged to build in conformity with the Green Development Standard Checklist on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, date stamped August 4, 2009.

6.         City Council approve the deletion of Clause (d) in Appendix 1, attached to the report (October 16, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as recommended in the supplementary report (November 4, 2009) from the Director, Community Planning.

7.         City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above-noted recommendations.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007, and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes to demolish 258 Victoria Street, a historical listed building, along with a commercial building at 252 Victoria Street.  Two other buildings which form part of the site, 19 and 21 Dundas Square, which are listed in the City of Toronto Heritage Properties Inventory, will be retained.  The applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a 39-storey mixed residential commercial building containing five storeys of office space and 230 square metres of retail, 238 residential units and six levels of underground parking.

The proposal meets the intent of the City’s Official Plan for intensification in Mixed Use Areas and reflects the principles expressed in the City’s Design Criteria for the Review of Tall Building Proposals.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Due to a miscommunication, the value of the applicant’s Section 37 contribution, as set out in the Final Report dated October 16, 2009 (agenda item 29.7), is overstated.  Specifically, public art is required in addition to other public benefits with a value of one million dollars.  Public art was considered acceptable by the applicant, as a possible element of the one million dollar contribution but not as an additional obligation.  Staff are satisfied that a total contribution of one million dollars is consistent with other recent Section 37 contributions in Ward 28 with comparable density increases.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report dated October 19, 2009 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required to give effect to the intent of the recommendations contained in this report.

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to submit an application under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 813, Trees, Article III, “Tree Protection” for the four private trees that qualify for protection and are proposed to be removed as part of the proposal, and complete the application review process.

4.         A demolition permit not be issued until a first below-grade building permit has been issued and a revised Heritage Easement Agreement has been signed and registered.

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following public benefits:

a.         Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Owner shall file with the City irrevocable standby letters of credit in the form and from a financial institution  acceptable to the City Solicitor to guarantee the satisfactory performance and completion of all works and obligations required pursuant to such agreements as the owner may be required to enter into and the said letters of credit shall be kept in full force and effect until all works and obligations have been fulfilled and satisfied.

                        The letters of credit shall be as follows:

-           $1,165,000 for the reconstruction and/or restoration of the heritage components of the building;

-           $200,000 for local streetscape improvements to Yonge Street, St. Joseph Street and/or St. Nicholas Street (which may include street lighting improvements identified pursuant to recommendation 5.c).  Any excess funds are to be directed to improvements to Queen’s Park;

-           $135,000 for an art contribution for upgrades to the building exterior and/or streetscape and shall be designed by an artist retained by the owner.

b.         Require that the amounts identified in a. above shall be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the letters of credit by the owner  to the City.

Although the following matters are not considered to be Section 37 contributions or benefits, they will be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a convenience:

c.         Undertake a Street Lighting Study and pay for replacement lighting around the street frontage of the subject property to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

d.         Architectural plans, elevations and landscaping including 1:50 scale elevations, will be secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the owner will be required to, in conjunction with each Site Plan Application submit 1:50 scale drawings in conformity with this requirement.

e.         Provide and pay for any municipal service upgrades required to support the development as determined by the Executive Director of Technical Services as part of the required Site Servicing Review.

f.          Provide continuous weather protection with a minimum clear depth of three metres on St. Joseph Street in accordance with the Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

g.         The Owner shall be encouraged to build in conformity with the Green Development Standard Checklist on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, date stamped August 13, 2009.

h.         Prior to final site plan approval, the owner will:

1.         Retain a consultant archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Culture under provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended), to carry out a Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the entire development property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found.  The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the Final Draft – Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, September 2006, Ministry of Culture.

2.         Should the archaeological assessment process continue beyond a Stage 1 assessment, any recommendations for Stages 2-4 mitigation strategies must be reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services prior to commencement of the site mitigation.

3.         No demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the City’s Heritage Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied.

4.         Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 606-618 Yonge Street.

5.         Submit a Conservation Plan to include drawings, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, that provide elevations and sections of all heritage building facades at 1:50 scale including, but not limited to, the following: (1) storefront design; (2) window specifications for all heritage façade elevations; (3) reconstruction plan for roof dormer/parapet/cornice details and (4) return side wall details.

6.         Additional information shall be submitted, based on the proposed Conservation Strategy, to include documentation substantially in accordance with that outlined within Section 8.0 of the submitted Heritage Impact Statement.  Specifically, a detailed plan shall also be submitted to outline mitigations measures that address construction impacts relative to the on-site heritage structures.

7.         Amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement registered on the site, Instrument No. E171218 dated June 1, 1998, at 5 St. Joseph Street and 9-15 St. Nicholas Streets, to address the proposed construction and permitted alterations.

8.         As an existing north/south public lane is required to form part of the lot, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, the owner shall obtain City Council’s approval of the closure and sale of the public lane and shall complete such sale of such lane.

9.         Submit to the Executive Director of Technical Services for review and acceptance, a site servicing review to demonstrate how this site will be serviced and whether the existing municipal infrastructure is adequate.

10.       Submit an Engineering Report to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Services that advises on the project’s constructability without displacing identified heritage resources.

11.       Submit a stormwater management report, a site servicing plan and site grading, drainage and landscape plans.

6.         City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above-noted recommendations.

This application was made on October 15, 2008 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This report reviews and recommends approval of an application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a 45-storey mixed use building with 412 residential units including 5 live-work units and approximately 2,800 square metres of non-residential space on a 0.267 hectare (0.660 acre) site.

The proposal meets the intent of the City’s Official Plan for intensification in Mixed Use Areas and reflects the principles expressed in the City’s Design Criteria for the Review of Tall Building Proposals.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 606-618 Yonge Street, 5-9 St. Joseph Street and 15-25 St. Nicholas Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by ERA Architects dated September 15, 2009, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services subject to the following conditions:

a.         Prior to Zoning By-Law Amendment approval, the owner shall:

-           submit a Conservation Plan to include drawings, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services that provide “blow-up” elevations and sections of all heritage building façades at 1:50 scale including, but not limited to, the following: (1) storefront design; (2) window specifications for all heritage facade elevations; (3) reconstruction plan for roof dormer/parapet/cornice details; (4) return side wall details, etc.

b.         Prior to Site Plan approval, the owner shall:

-           provide additional information to be submitted, based on the proposed Conservation Strategy, to include documentation substantially in accordance with that outlined within Section 8.0 (page 44) of the submitted Heritage Impact Statement. Specifically, a detailed plan shall also be submitted to outline mitigations measures that address construction impacts relative to the on-site heritage structures;

-           enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 606-618 Yonge Street with the City;

-           amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement registered on the site, Instrument No. E171218 dated June 1, 1998, at 5 St. Joseph Street and 9- 15 St Nicholas Streets, to address the proposed construction and permitted alterations.

c.         Prior to the issuance of any building permit, including a permit for the demolition, excavation, and/or shoring on the subject property, the owner shall:

-           provide a Letter of Credit in a form and in an amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan; and

 -          provide final plans satisfactory to the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.

d.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the applicant shall:

-           provide evidence and documentation that the project scheme has been implemented, per approved Conservation Plan, satisfactory to the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.

2.         City Council include the following properties on the City of Toronto’s Inventory of Heritage Properties:

a.         606 Yonge Street

b.         608 Yonge Street

c.         614 Yonge Street

d.         616 Yonge Street

e.         618 Yonge Street.

3.         City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  (Please note 610 and 612 Yonge Street are listed on the City of Toronto’s Inventory of Heritage Properties):

a.         606 Yonge Street

b.         608 Yonge Street

c.         610 Yonge Street

d.         612 Yonge Street

e.         614 Yonge Street

f.          616 Yonge Street

g.         618 Yonge Street.

4.         If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the Solicitor to introduce the Bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

5.         If there are any objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designations to the Conservation Review Board.

6.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the following properties:

a.         606 Yonge Street

b.         608 Yonge Street

c.         610 Yonge Street

d.         612 Yonge Street

e.         614 Yonge Street

f.          616 Yonge Street

g.         618 Yonge Street.

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into a Heritage Easement Agreement.

8.         City Council grant authority for the necessary amendments to the Existing Heritage Easement Agreement (Instrument No. E171218).

This report addresses an application to permit a 45-storey mixed use development containing approximately 38,775 square metres of residential gross floor area and approximately 2,800 square metres of non-residential gross floor area on a 0.267 hectare site located on the south side of St. Joseph Street between Yonge Street and St. Nicholas Street. The site is municipally known as 606-618 Yonge Street, 5-9 St. Joseph Street, and 15-25 St. Nicholas Street.

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations to the heritage properties at 606-618 Yonge Street, 5-9 St. Joseph Street; and 15-25 St. Nicholas Street and designate seven properties at 606, 608, 610, 612, 614, 616 and 618 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage value as contributing to a historic and contextual streetscape that has defined Toronto’s primary commercial street since the late 19^th century.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing of the owner’s appeal to oppose the current applications.

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Ontario Municipal Board that City Council’s position is that any redevelopment of the site at 1540 Bloor Street West must:

a.         comply with the zoning by-law implementing the Bloor-Dundas Avenue Study;

b.         satisfy the requirements of Section 3.2.1.6 of the City’s Official Plan as set out in this report;

c.         secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director;

d.         satisfy the Chief Planner and Executive Director with respect to site plan matters, including the approval of plans and drawings and site plan conditions.

3.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to include the Technical Services' issues described in the supplementary report dated November 4, 2009, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as part of the staff position at the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing of the owner’s appeal.

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision on the applications within the time allotted by the Planning Act.  The applications propose to demolish the existing one and two-storey commercial and residential buildings including nine residential rental units located at 1540 Bloor Street West to be replaced with a 27-storey (82.5 metres plus 10.0 metres for mechanical), 254-unit, residential condominium with retail at grade.  The applicant has not proposed to replace the rental housing units in the redevelopment.

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council’s direction for the City Solicitor to oppose the proposal in its current form at the OMB and to advise the OMB of Council’s position regarding the appropriate form of development on the site.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the revised proposal as illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division (dated stamped: August 14, 2009), generally on the basis of the following:

a.         The applicant withdraw their appeal to the former City of York Official Plan.

b.         The City Solicitor in consultation with the Chief Planner, Executive Director, City Planning submit to the Ontario Municipal Board a Zoning By-law amendment, which provides for the development of the subject lands with up to 596 residential dwelling units, including 146 non-condominium registered affordable replacement rental units subject to the provision of  the Section 37 matters in Recommendation 2 below and as discussed in more detail in the Planning report of October 30, 2009, in a matter satisfactory to such officials.

c.         The owner entering into and registering a Section 37 Agreement on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division securing the matters referred to in Recommendations 1.b. and 2 below.

d.         The Ontario Municipal Board order to be held pending the satisfactory execution and registration of the Section 37 Agreement.

2.         City Council authorize the appropriate City staff and require the owner to enter into and register an agreement or agreements pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor to secure the following facilities, services and matters to be provided by the owner, at its expense to the City and as described in more detail in the Planning Report dated October 30, 2009:

a.         The owner shall pay to the City an indexed cash contribution of $500,000 to be used for capital improvements and enhancements to the Ben Nobleman Park, Wychwood Barns Park, Cedarvale Ravine, Cedarvale Park and Artscape Wychwood Barns.

Such cash amount to be indexed in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement by the owner to the date of payment of the sum by the owner to the City.

b.         The owner shall make the payment in Recommendation 2.a. above within 10 business days following the date the Zoning By-law Amendment comes into full force and effect and in any event prior to any building permit or any demolition permit issuing for any portion of the lands other than for the repair of any existing building on the lands.

c.         The owner shall contribute $700,000 for on-site public art (indexed annually) implemented under the City’s public art provisions and practices.

d.         The owner shall construct, provide and maintain 146 new replacement dwelling units on the site as rental dwelling units for a period of at least 20 years, commencing from the date of initial occupancy of each unit, during which time no application for demolition without replacement or conversion to condominium or non-rental housing purposes can be made.

e.           The owner shall provide rents for the 146 replacement rental dwelling units in accordance with the terms of the Section 37 Agreement for a period of 10 years for all new tenants and for the life of each tenancy for returning tenants.

f.          The owner shall provide a tenant relocation and assistance package, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit on the land, in accordance with the provisions of the Section 37 Agreement.

g.         The owner shall complete the construction of the replacement rental dwelling units such that they are ready and available for occupancy prior to the date on which the earliest of the other dwelling units to be constructed on the land are ready and made available for occupancy, other than the buildings existing on the lands in 2008 or a temporary new home sales and marketing office.

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit to demolish the building(s) on the land under Section 33 of the Planning Act, following the last to occur of the Zoning By-law Amendment in Recommendation 1.b. coming into full force and effect, and the provision to the City of an indexed letter of credit satisfactory to the City Solicitor in the amount of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) to secure the provision and completion of the 146  replacement rental units in a timely manner, subject to the following conditions:

a.         The owner erect a residential building on site no later than four and a half (4½) years from the date the first permit is issued for demolition of  all or any portion of the building(s).

b.         Should the owner fail to complete the new building containing the 146 replacement rental dwelling units within the time specified in condition 3.a., in addition to any other remedy, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

c.         In addition to condition b., should the owner either:

i.          fail to obtain the foundation permit for the construction of the below ground concrete structure required for the development of the north building containing the146 replacement rental units within one (1) year of the date the first demolition permit issued for all or any portion of the site; or

ii.         fail to obtain the full building permit, including for the above grade portion of the building,  required for the development of the north building containing the 146 replacement rental units within one and a half (1½)  years of the date the first demolition permit issued for all or any portion of the site,

the letter of credit may be cashed and the funds may be retained by the City and used toward the provision of affordable rental housing, at the discretion of the Chief Planner, in addition to any other remedy the City may have and for the sake of clarity, in addition to amongst other matters the requirement for the  replacement of the 146 replacement rental units. The amount of the letter of credit to be adjusted annually, indexed in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA. The letter of credit may be released upon the issuance of the full building permit required for the development of the north building containing the required rental replacement dwelling units within the above specified one and a half  (1½) year period. Such letter of credit, payment and timing to be additionally secured through the provisions of the Zoning By-law Amendment and the Section 37 Agreement.

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Following a lengthy hearing at which the City and the tenants of 310 and 320 Tweedsmuir Avenue appeared in opposition to the owner’s application, in a Decision dated February 18, 2000, the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) allowed the appeals against the City’s refusal to amend the former City of York’s Zoning By-law and Official Plan at 310 and 320 Tweedsmuir Avenue.  The Decision required, amongst other things, that the owner provide replacement rental housing with affordable rent levels and tenant assistance.  The OMB withheld its final order until the City and the owner had executed and registered on title a Section 37 Agreement and  until the  tenants had signed satisfactory leases for the replacement rental housing. In addition, Site Plan approval was to be finalized.

The OMB decision allowed a mixed built form on the site consisting of two 25-storey towers, a row of townhouses and a maximum nine-storey rental building that would contain the required 146 replacement rental units.  In total, 409 dwelling units were approved for the site. 

Since the OMB decision, the new owner of the property (Morguard Residential) worked with City staff to redesign the built form by redeploying the approved density in a design that more closely complies with the City’s Design Criteria for Review of Tall Buildings.  The revised proposal contains 596 residential units, of which 146 will be replacement rental units.  The units will be contained within two towers atop 3-storey podiums.  The purpose of this report is to describe the revised design, rental and affordable housing related plan and tenant assistance plan and to seek Council’s direction to appear before the OMB in support of these revised plans.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the Ontario Municipal Board appeal and referral made by the applicant on the applications for Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. 08 186000 STE 28 OZ and Site Plan Application No. 08 186022 STE 28 SA.

2.         City Council endorse a Development Strategy for the lands known municipally as 251-255 King Street East, 37 Sherbourne Street and 2 Abbey Lane, substantially as set out in Attachment 9 – Development Strategy Table, attached to the report dated November 3, 2009, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as a basis for a settlement at the Ontario Municipal Board, and including the following:

a.         require the submission of a revised Heritage Impact Statement to address the potential for rehabilitation and retention in-situ of the heritage structure at 251 King Street East;

b.         request the Manager, Preservation Services to have a peer review of the revised Heritage Impact Statement carried out;

c.         if, following the peer review of the revised Heritage Impact Statement, the Manager, Preservation Services agrees that rehabilitation and retention in-situ of the heritage structure within a proposed development is not possible then rehabilitation and retention in–situ of the north and west elevations will be required; and

d.         reduce parking to the minimum number of spaces acceptable to the Manager of Development Engineering and/or provide parking off-site in order to facilitate the retention of the heritage structure at 251 King Street East.

3.         City Council authorize entering into and execution of an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the provision of public benefits and related matters in the event that a settlement is achieved or, should there be no settlement, the Ontario Municipal Board enacts amendments to the Zoning By-law for the City of Toronto providing for such an agreement.

The applicant has appealed the rezoning application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time allotted by the Planning Act.  The associated Site Plan application has also been appealed.  A pre-hearing conference is to be held on November 17, 2009.  A hearing is set to commence in early 2010.

Since the appeal, the applicant has submitted a revised application to the City which Planning staff have circulated.  Appropriate agencies and City departments are continuing to evaluate the revised proposal.

The revised application before the OMB is to permit the redevelopment of 251-255 King Street East, 37 Sherbourne Street and 2 Abbey Lane to construct a 17-storey mixed use building and reconstruct 2 elevations of the existing heritage building (251 King Street East).  The proposed development will include 138 units with 285 square metres of commercial space on the ground floor.

This report recommends refusal of the proposal to amend the Zoning By-law and the associated Site Plan application.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council refuse the demolition of the designated property at 251 King Street East under s.34(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act as proposed in the rezoning application No. 08 186000 STE 28 OZ for the development of lands at 251-255 King Street East and 37 Sherbourne Street, in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by TACT Design Inc., dated July 21, 2008 with final revisions dated May 20, 2009.

2.         City Council refuse the request to demolish the property at 251 King Street East in accordance with Section 30(2) and 34(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act, received on October 19, 2009.

3.         If the refusal of the demolition permit under the Ontario Heritage Act is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of City Council's refusal.

4.         Should City Council approve the proposed rezoning application No. 08 186000 STE 28 OZ for the development of lands at 251-255 King Street East and 37 Sherbourne Street, including the demolition of the entire heritage structure at 251 King Street East and the reconstruction of the north and west facades, the following conditions be required prior to the submission of the Bill to City Council for enactment:

a.         the applicant shall retain a consultant archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Culture under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended), to carry out a Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the entire development property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the Final Draft – Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, September 2006, Ministry of Culture;

b.         should the archaeological assessment process continue beyond a Stage 1 assessment, any recommendations for Stages 2-4 mitigation strategies must be reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services prior to commencement of the site mitigation;

c.         the consultant archaeologist shall submit a copy of the relevant assessment report(s) to the Heritage Preservation Services Unit in both hard copy format and as an Acrobat PDF file on compact disk;

d.         no demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the City’s Planning Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied.

5.         City Council receive the recommendation of the Toronto Preservation Board contained in the letter dated October 22, 2009 from the Board.

This report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed demolition of the designated heritage property at 251 King Street East.

The rezoning application for this property seeks permission for a 17-storey residential building to be constructed on the lands know municipally as 251-255 King Street East and 37 Sherbourne Street. The proposal includes the demolition through disassembly of the entire heritage building, and the reconstruction using salvaged materials of the north and west elevations of the heritage building, for incorporation as part of the new development.  In accordance with the Parks Canada document “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada” endorsed by City Council, staff do not consider this approach to be a legitimate conservation strategy given the extent of alteration proposed and the potential for rehabilitation of the resource. As such, staff cannot support the proposed demolition. 

Located within the original 10 blocks of the Town of York, Toronto’s birthplace, the further impact of a 17-storey tower on this site and on the broader heritage context of the Old Town neighbourhood, is a significant issue of concern that staff has raised throughout their review of this application. Staff advise that further development intensification that proposes height significantly above that which is historically characteristic of this neighbourhood, should reasonably be assessed in the context of a Heritage Conservation District Study for this area.

This is a supplemental report in response to an application to demolish the heritage property at 251 King Street East, received by Heritage Preservation Services on October 19, 2009, in accordance with Section 30(2) and 34(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The supplemental report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed demolition of the heritage property at 251 King Street East. Notice of the Council decision must be given to the owner on or before January 17, 2010.

The Toronto Preservation Board on October 22, 2009, considered the following reports:

a.         (October 5, 2009), from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting 251 King Street East (The National Hotel) – Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property; and

b          (October 20, 2009) from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting 251 King Street East (The National Hotel) – Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property- Supplemental.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the form of a By-law to amend the Toronto Official Plan to permit a 4-storey, 65-unit, private residential-care and assisted living facility at 2 O’Connor Drive and 2, 6, and 12 Fernwood Gardens.

2.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the form of an amendment to Zoning By-law 6752, as amended, for the former Borough of East York, to implement the proposal substantially in accordance with the drawings on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, for a 4-storey, 65-unit, private residential-care and assisted living facility, the draft by-law to include, but not be restricted to, the following requirements:

a.         the minimum Lot Area shall be 9,400 square meters and shall exclude the areas of the Lot located below the top-of-bank as established by the TRCA on May 28, 2007;

b.         the maximum Gross Floor Area of all buildings or structures erected on the Lot shall not exceed 7,620 square metres;

c.         Grade shall be defined as +124.75 metres Canadian Geodedic Datum;

d.         the maximum height of the building shall not exceed 16 metres to the top of the parapet, measured from Grade, excluding elements for the functional operation of the building which may include elevator over-runs, mechanical penthouse, ventilation equipment, renewable energy systems and roof canopy, which shall not exceed an additional 5 metres above the maximum height of the building;

e.         a minimum of one Loading Space shall be provided on the Lot;

f.          a minimum of 31 Parking Spaces shall be provided on the Lot;

g.         the minimum setback to the top-of-bank as established by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority(TRCA) on May 28, 2007 shall be 10 m; and

h.         a minimum of 30%  of the minimum Lot Area shall be Landscaped Open Space.

3.         City Council request the City Clerk to schedule and give notice of the statutory public meeting for the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council.

4.         City Council request that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the owner, report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on any proposed changes to the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Package set in Recommendation 13.a. below.

5.         City Council require the owner to provide the following prior to receiving Site Plan Approval:

a.         A response to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority’s comments contained within the September 30, 2009 memo, as they relate to natural heritage.

b.         A cost estimate for review and acceptance for the proposed planting within the ravine and natural feature protected area, in addition to a cost estimate for the preparation and implementation of the ravine stewardship plan.

c.         A financial security as a security for implementing the planting plan within the ravine and natural feature protected area.

d.         Architectural plans at 1:100, elevations at 1:50 and landscaping plans at 1:100 to be secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, and the owner will be required to, in conjunction with the Site Plan Application, submit such scaled drawings in conformity with this requirement.

e.         Final development plans and a landscape plan that enhances the heritage character and views of the front façade of the heritage building and exterior lighting plan for the heritage building, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

f.          A revised Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services.

g.         A detailed Conservation Plan which includes: as-found record of the existing house including photographs keyed to plans and elevations of all visible exteriors and interiors; detailed descriptions for the proposed heritage conservation work; description of the reversibility of alterations; schedule of long term conservation and maintenance requirements; and cost estimates for conservation work of the heritage property located at 2 O’Connor Drive, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

6.         City Council require the owner to convey the valley/hazard lands, including all lands up to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority’s staked top-of-bank line, to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for a nominal sum of two dollars ($2) prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills to Council.

7.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the form of a recommendation to approve the application to demolish the 36 rental housing units located at 2, 6, and 12 Fernwood Gardens pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363, subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667:

a.         The owner provide assistance to the tenants in the existing rental units as required in Recommendation 13.a. below.

b.         The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect.

c.         The owner enter into, and register on title, an agreement or notice thereof, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, which secures the conditions outlined above in items a. and b. of this Recommendation.

8.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the form of a recommendation to authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act (Municipal Code Chapter 667) after the satisfaction of the following conditions:

a.         That the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect.

b.         Site Plan Approval for the proposed development is issued pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and pursuant to the Zoning By-law Amendment.

9.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the form of a recommendation to authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act permit (under Municipal Code Chapter 667), after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval contained in Recommendation 8.

10.       City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the form of a recommendation to authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for the foundation of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 8, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code.

11.       City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report to the January 12, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council on the appropriate measures to conserve the heritage resource on the site.

12.       Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the protection and long term maintenance of the heritage property at 2 O’Connor Drive, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

13.       Prior to the introduction of Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to execute one or more agreements pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and City Solicitor. The agreement(s) are to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor and to secure the following facilities, services and matters from the owner at its expense:

a.         Require the owner provide the following Tenant Relocation and Assistance Package for each tenant of 2, 6 and 12 Fernwood Gardens:

1.         A cash payment (or rent relief) equivalent to three (3) months of rent.

                        2.         A $500 moving cost expense allowance.

3.         The return of the tenant’s last month’s rent cheque, with interest (if applicable).

4.         Additional compensation (in the form of a cash payment or rent relief) for long term tenants of the Fernwood Gardens apartment buildings, based on the following table:

-           6-10 Years                   -           2 months' rent

-           11-15 Years                 -           4 months' rent

-           16-20 Years                 -           6 months' rent

-           21-25 Years                 -           10 months' rent

-           25-30 Years                 -           12 months' rent

-           31 Years or more         -           14 months' rent.

The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

b.         The owner shall provide to the City the items identified in Recommendation 5 above.

c.         The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials as shown on the plans and elevations referenced in Recommendation 5.d. above, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director.

d.         The owner shall be encouraged to build in conformity with the Green Development Standard Checklist received by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on December 30, 2008.

e.         The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support the development.

14.       City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above-noted recommendations.

These applications were made on or after January 1, 2007 and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

These applications propose to develop the site at 2 O'Connor Drive, 2, 6, and 12 Fernwood Gardens with a 4-storey, 65-unit, private residential-care and assisted living facility.  The Taylor House, also known as “Fernwood”, located at 2 O’Connor Drive, will be preserved and incorporated into the development proposal.  All other buildings on the site will be demolished, including three buildings containing 36 residential rental units that are not proposed to be replaced.

A Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code) has been made and is reviewed concurrently with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the applications to amend the Official Plan, Zoning By-law and Site Plan Control, as well as the application for demolition of residential rental units under Municipal Code 667 for the reasons outlined in the Staff Report.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council designate by by-law the area shown on Attachment No. 1 of the report dated October 6, 2009 from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, as the Harbord Village Heritage Conservation District Phase 2, in accordance with Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

2.         City Council adopt by by-law the Harbord Village Heritage Conservation District Phase 2 Plan, dated August 2009, as the district plan for the Harbord Village Heritage Conservation District Phase 2.

3.         If there are any objections to the by-law under Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the by-law.

4.         Until such time as the by-law designating the area as the Harbord Village Heritage Conservation District Phase 2 comes into force or is repealed, City Council direct that all properties within the area, unless designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, be listed in the City’s Inventory of Heritage Properties.

The purpose of this report is to recommend the designation of the Harbord Village Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Phase 2, and to adopt the associated HCD Plan by by-law under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The district analysis and plan were led by the Harbord Village Residents Association and completed by Catherine Nasmith Architect.

Heritage Preservation Services Staff have reviewed the proposed designation and the district plan and believe they merit designation and adoption under the OHA.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the application to alter 84 Crescent Road received September 15, 2009 from the applicant, Kelly Buffey of AKB Atelier Kastelic Buffey.

This report recommends that City Council refuse the application to alter an “A” rated house in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (SRHCD) in accordance with Section 42(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. 

This application requests the removal and replacement of the existing sun room.  Staff recommends the refusal of this application as it would result in the removal of a heritage attribute of a significant heritage house in South Rosedale.  This attribute is visible from the street, in good condition and contributes to the heritage character of the neighbourhood.

The consent under the Ontario Heritage Act is in addition to a demolition permit required under the Building Code Act and the approval of any variances to the existing zoning by-law.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the 16 York Street -York Centre - ICE Public Art Plan attached to the report dated October 22, 2009, from the Director, Urban Design.

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 16 York Street - York Centre - ICE Public Art Plan.  The plan has been prepared by the Owner and the Public Art Consultant in compliance with the development approval provisions.  The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the Owner will commission public art in the publicly accessible area of the development.

The 16 York Street - York Centre - ICE Public Art Plan provides a framework for the commissioning of art in three phases, the first location being in the Urban Courtyard.  The attached plan meets the objectives of the City Planning Percent for the Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the 661 University Avenue Public Art Plan MaRS Discovery Centre Phase II, attached to the report dated October 22, 2009, from the Director, Urban Design.

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 661 University Avenue Public Art Plan MaRS Discovery Centre Phase II.  The plan has been prepared by the Owner and the Public Art Consultant in compliance with the development approval provisions.  The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the Owner will commission public art in the publicly accessible area of the development.

The 661 University Avenue Public Art Plan MaRS Discovery Centre Phase II provides a framework for the commissioning of art at the south east corner of University Avenue and College Street.  The attached plan meets the objectives of the City Planning Percent for the Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Refused the request for a variance to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated two face, tri-vision roof sign located on top of a two-storey building at 850 Bloor Street West.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Steve Wolowich of Astral Media Outdoor, on behalf of Gyro King Investments for approval of a variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated two face, tri-vision roof sign on top of a two-storey building at 850 Bloor Street West.

Staff recommends refusal of this application.  The variance is major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Dominic Rotundo of Pattison Sign Group, on behalf of Gallaria Mall Inc. for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated pedestal sign containing an illuminated LED electronic changeable copy message centre at the northeast corner of the property at 1245 Dupont Street.

Staff recommends refusal of this application.  The variance is major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code.

The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District, respecting the Sign Variance – 83 Bloor Street West, until its meeting to be held on February 9, 2010.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Roy Dzeko of CBS Outdoor on behalf of Hugo Boss Canada for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit replacement of an existing third party illuminated two face roof sign with a newly designed illuminated two face third party roof sign containing an LED electronic static copy image board equipped to control the changeable copy image remotely at 83 Bloor Street West.

Staff recommends refusal of this application.  The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code.

The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the request for front yard parking at 28 Coxwell Avenue, with the following conditions:

1.         The parking area be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.4 m by 5.9 m in dimension.

2.         The applicant remove the existing asphalt paving and re-pave the parking area with semi-permeable paving materials.

3.         The applicant remove the excess paving and restore the area to soft landscaping as shown on Appendix ‘A’.

4.         The applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services.

5.         The applicant plant a tree in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. The tree shall be a full shade canopy tree or approved equivalent, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Where and if Urban Forestry has determined that the planting of a tree at this location is not feasible, the applicant shall pay for the planting of a tree, subject to the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards.

6.         The applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 28 Coxwell Avenue for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the request for front yard parking at 153 Silver Birch Avenue, with the following conditions:

1.         The parking area be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.6 m by 5.9 m in dimension.

2.         The applicant hand dig any excavation that falls within 1.0 m, as measured horizontally from the field markings, and locate the gas service. Enbridge is to be contacted to ensure that the proper clearances are maintained and to determine if the service will require relocation.

3.         The applicant pay for the installation of the ramp to service the parking space.

4.         The applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services.

5.         The applicant plant a tree in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. The tree shall be a full shade canopy tree or approved equivalent, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Where and if Urban Forestry has determined that the planting of a tree at this location is not feasible, the applicant shall pay for the planting of a tree, subject to the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards.

6.         The applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 153 Silver Birch Avenue for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

The purpose of this report is to consider a request by the property owners of 82 Colin Avenue to be exempted from Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 – Fences, Section 447-2(B).  This section states that the maximum height of a fence in the rear yard cannot exceed 2.0 metres and the owners have five sections of the rear yard fence which do not comply with the height regulation as follows:

1.         Fence measuring 2.27 metres in height and 20.3 metres in length and abutting the south property line and adjacent to 80 Colin Avenue.

2.         Fence measuring in heights ranging between 2.85 metres to 2.40 metres and  9.10 metres in length abutting the south property line adjacent to 80 Colin Avenue and extending from the rear wall of the detached garage to the rear west property line.

3.         Fence measuring a maximum height of 3.48 metres and 3.15 metres in length and extends from the southwest corner of the dwelling house to the detached garage.

4.         Fence measuring in heights ranging between 2.35 metres to 2.20 metres and 7.83 metres in length abutting the west property line.

5.         Fence measuring in heights ranging between 2.35 metres to 2.15 metres and 20.1 metres in length abutting the north property line.

The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the fence exemption at 1733 Bloor Street West (Keele Subway Station).

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant being the Toronto Transit Commission is seeking an exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to erect a fence, at the north and south sides of the property, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence can be constructed to a height of 2.5 metres.

The current sections of fence (chain-link construction) along the north and south sides of the property, is constructed to a height of approximately 1.7 metres. The proposed section of fence on the north side of the property is to be constructed to a height of approximately 4 metres and 69 metres in length except for a section of the fence to be constructed at a height of 5 metres for a 22 metre span. The proposed section of fence on the south side of the property is to be constructed to a height of approximately 4 metres and 37 metres in length. Both sections of proposed fence would not be in compliance with the By-law.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant being the Toronto Transit Commission is seeking an exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to erect a fence, at the north and south sides of the property, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence can be constructed to a height of 1.2 metres in a front yard. The By-law also provides that a fence can be constructed to a height of 2.5 metres when it abuts a non-residential property.

The proposed sections of wrought iron fence along the east and north sides of the property will replace the existing chain link fence. The proposed section of fence along the east side of the property is to be constructed to a height of approximately 2 metres and 18.83 metres in length. The proposed section of fence along the north side of the property is to be constructed to a height of approximately 2 metres and 3.65 metres in length. The proposed section of fence on the south side of the property is to be constructed to a height of approximately 3 metres and 3 metres in length. All new sections of the proposed fence would not be in compliance with the By-law.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant, being the property owner is seeking an exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to permit an existing wooden fence, in the rear, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence in the rear or side yard area can be constructed to a height of 2 metres.

The wooden fence has been constructed along the entire width of the rear yard and has a height of 2.52 metres above the grade. See Attachments 1 2 and 3.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant, being the property owner, is seeking exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to permit the existing fence and gate, in the rear yard, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence in the rear yard area can be constructed to a height of 2 metres.

The fence located on the east side of the rear yard for which an exemption is being requested consists of a section of wooden fence 2.5 metres in height and 1.03 metres in length, a gate 2.5 metres in height and .77 metres in length and a bamboo screen, attached to the wooden fence which is 2.1 metres in height and 4.7 metres in length. The fence consisting of the three aforementioned sections does not comply with the maximum permitted height of 2 metres. See Attachments 1, 2 and 3.

The Toronto and East York Community Council approved the application for the proposed café permit at 647A Mount Pleasant Road, Hillsdale Avenue flankage, with the following conditions:

1.         Staff undertake a review in one year.

2.         The patio be closed at 11:00 p.m.

3.         A noise barrier be installed at the east end of the patio satisfactory to City staff.

4.         Garbage cans be provided on the patio.

5.          “No Smoking” and “Respect our Neighbours” signs be posted on the patio.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

To report on an appeal received on April 27, 2009 from Maddalena Gargarella for the denial of the issuance of a boulevard café permit, based on the results of the public poll.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant is seeking approval to continue to operate the boulevard café at 1186 Queen Street West, operating as Brooklynn.

The Toronto and East York Community Council approved the continuation of the boulevard café permit on the frontage of 130 Eglinton Avenue East, with the existing operating conditions being imposed by Toronto and East York Community Council.

1.         Serving of alcohol and food on the boulevard café cease by 10:30 p.m.

2.         Patrons vacating the café area by 11:00 p.m.

3.         There be no exterior noise generated by the establishment, including no noise

emanating from the interior to the exterior.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. Municipal Licensing and Standards was asked to report on the continuation of the operation of the boulevard café Philthy McNasty’s on the frontage of 130 Eglinton Avenue East.

The Toronto and East York Community Council approved the continuation of the boulevard café permit for 1402B Queen Street East, with the existing operating conditions being imposed by Toronto and East York Community Council as follows:

a.         All service of food and beverages is discontinued by 10:30 p.m. seven days a week

b.         All patrons to vacate the café area by no later than 11:00 p.m. seven days a week.

c.         The café area be cleaned, cleared and all furnishings stacked by no later than 11:00 p.m. seven days a week.

d.         No music or amplified sound shall be played, at any time, on the boulevard café.

e.         No amplified sound or music is permitted to emanate from within the premise or be produced on the boulevard café at any time.

f.          Doors and windows located on the residential flankage shall not be left open or propped open while there is music or amplified sound in the interior.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report is regarding the continuation of the operation of the boulevard café Red Rocket Coffee, on the Vancouver Avenue flankage at 1402B Queen Street East.

The Toronto and East York Community Council confirmed the notice and directed that a second notice be given to the property owners at 27 Camberwell Road under this section.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The Grass and Weeds by-law provides that the owner or occupant of private land shall cut the grass and weeds on their land and remove the cuttings whenever the growth of grass and weeds exceeds 20 centimetres in height. The subject property has plant growth in excess of 20 centimetres in the front and rear yard areas for which the owner has applied for relief to be exempted as a natural garden.

The front and rear yards were inspected and the Natural Environment Inspector determined that the garden was not within the provision of the natural garden exemption requirements. The homeowner was issued a Notice detailing the work required in order to come into compliance with the natural garden exemption requirements, however the work has not been completed as of September 24, 2009.

The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the report dated October 20, 2009, from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District, respecting the Request for a Natural Garden Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 489 - Grass and Weeds at 144 Manor Road East, until its next meeting to be held on January 12, 2010.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The Grass and Weeds by-law provides that the owner or occupant of private land shall cut the grass and weeds on their land and remove the cuttings whenever the growth of grass and weeds exceeds 20 centimetres in height. The subject property has plant growth in excess of 20 centimetres in the front and rear yard areas for which the owner has applied for relief to be exempted as a natural garden. See Attachments 1 and 2.

The front and rear yards were inspected and the Natural Environment Inspector determined that the garden was not within the provision of the natural garden exemption requirements. See Attachment 3.

The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the report dated October 20, 2009 from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District, respecting the Request for an Art Mural Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 485 - Graffiti at 1386 Danforth Road, until its next meeting to be held on January 12, 2010.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant is the property owner who has requested a review of a notice given for graffiti in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 485 Graffiti to give consideration to the wall markings being classed as an Art Mural.

The Graffiti by-law provides in section 4E. that an owner on whom a notice has been issued may request that the issuance of the notice be reviewed by the Toronto and East York Community Council on the basis that the markings are exempt as an art mural.

The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:

1.         Staff schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.

2.         Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

3.         Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The proposal is to rezone a newly completed landscaped parkette at the southeast corner of Broadview Avenue and Erindale Avenue, formerly part of 769 Broadview Avenue, consistent with the Parks and Open Space Areas designation in the Official Plan.

The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information on the above-noted rezoning and seeks Community Council’s direction on further processing of the matter and on the community consultation process.

The next step is to hold a community consultation meeting with the Statutory Public Meeting targeted for the first quarter of 2010.

The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:

1.         Staff schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.

2.         Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents to a larger area than the normal 120 metres of the site, to be determined in conjunction with the Councillors in Wards 31 and 32, and with such additional notification to be paid for by the proponent.

3.         Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes a 12-storey mixed-use building with retail at grade and underground parking at 2055 and 2057 Danforth Avenue.

This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.

A public meeting will be scheduled in the last quarter of 2009.

The application has been circulated to City departments and external agencies, where appropriate, for comment.

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approved the request for a variance to permit, for identification purposes, five non-illuminated projecting signs on the College Street frontage of the property at 30 College Street.

2.         Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant, upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Nicole Paul with WSI Sign Systems Ltd. on behalf of Native Child Family Services, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, five non-illuminated projecting signs on the College Street frontage of the property at 30 College Street.

Staff recommends approval of the application.  The variance is minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code.

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approved the requested variance to permit, for identification purposes, replacement of a non-illuminated fascia sign and a non-illuminated projecting sign with a newly designed non-illuminated fascia sign and a non-illuminated projecting sign on the front elevation of the building at 765 Pape Avenue.

2.         Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant, upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Maria Missailidis of Simmer Design, on behalf of Dr. Anna Tsoraklidis, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, replacement of a non-illuminated fascia sign and a non-illuminated projecting sign with a newly designed non-illuminated fascia sign and a non-illuminated projecting sign on the front elevation of the building at 765 Pape Avenue.

Staff recommends approval of the application.  The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code.

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approved the requested variances to permit, for identification purposes, replacement of an existing illuminated ground sign with a newly designed illuminated ground sign containing an electronic message display copy and required that energy efficient lights be used.

2.         Directed that the sign be turned off from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. by means of an automated timing device.