Agenda |
Regular |
Executive Committee |
Meeting No. | 43 | Contact | Patsy Morris, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Monday, April 19, 2010 |
Phone | ||
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
exc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Committee Room 1, City Hall
|
Chair | Mayor David Miller |
Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.
Special Assistance for Members of the Public: City staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call (416-392-8485), TTY 416-338-0889 or e-mail ( exc@toronto.ca ).
Closed Meeting Requirements: If the Executive Committee wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the committee must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Committee has to meet privately. (City of Toronto Act, 2006)
Notice to People Writing or making presentations to the Executive Committee: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.
The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City's website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it - such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address - available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.
The City videotapes committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be videotaping you and City staff may make the video tapes available to the public.
If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or by calling 416-392-8485.
Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
Confirmation of Minutes - March 1, 2010 and April 7, 2010
Speakers/Presentations - A complete list will be distributed at the meeting.
Communications/Reports
|
||||||
EX43.1 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 1, 25, 28 |
City of Toronto Stimulus Projects – Additional Projects |
Origin |
(April 1, 2010) Report from the City Manager |
Recommendations |
The City Manager recommends that:
1. Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into funding agreements with the Government of Ontario for the delivery of the Canadian Film Centre, Rexdale Multi-Purpose Community Hub, and Regent Park Arts and Cultural Centre projects under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund (ISF) program.
2. Council approve additional project costs of $34.691 million to the overall City ISF program, comprised of $10.691 million for City Programs, and $24.000 million on behalf of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) (see Table 1).
3. Council approve an increase in the 2010 – 2019 Capital Budget and Plan in the amount of $8.691 million (see Table 2) for:
i. Facilities and Real Estate in the amount of $4.190 million for the Rexdale Multi-Service Community Hub, comprised of: a $3.260 million ISF contribution from the Governments of Canada and Ontario, $0.080 million from previously approved City capital, and $0.850 from third-party contributions; and
ii. Economic Development and Culture in the amount of $4.501 million for the Canadian Film Centre, comprised of: a $4.000 million ISF contribution from the Governments of Canada and Ontario, and $0.501 from third-party contributions.
4. Any future budget amendments that may result from the implementation of City stimulus projects be reported as part of regular quarterly Capital Budget variance reports.
5. Authorize the appropriate City officials to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. |
Summary |
On September 23, 2009, Council approved City infrastructure projects to be included in funding agreements under Federal and Provincial stimulus programs.
This report seeks authority for the Mayor and City Manager to enter into additional funding agreements with the Government of Ontario for the delivery of the Canadian Film Centre, Rexdale Multi-Purpose Community Hub, and Regent Park Arts and Cultural Centre projects under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund program, and presents the financial impact of these funding agreements on the 2010 – 2019 Council Approved Capital Budget and Plan.
Incremental costs for these stimulus projects are fully funded by the Federal and Provincial governments, previously approved City capital, and third-party contributions. No new City funding is being requested in this report. |
Financial Impact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City Infrastructure Stimulus Fund (ISF) Program Increase Entering into these funding agreements will increase the overall cost of City ISF funded projects by $34.691 million, from $595.292 million, as approved in September 2009, to $629.983 million. Table 1 summarizes the $34.691 million of “Total Additional Cost” of which $10.691 million are managed by City programs and $24.000 million by the Toronto Community Housing Corporation. The cost of City managed projects are funded approximately two-thirds or $7.260 million by the Federal and Provincial governments and one-third or $3.431 million by the City and third-party contributions. The City of Toronto, on behalf of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC), has received approval for an ISF contribution for the construction of Regent Park Arts & Culture Centre in the amount of $24.000 million. This project is fully funded by the Federal and Provincial governments with no commitment from the City.
2010 to 2019 Capital Budget and Plan Amendment The impact on the City of Toronto’s 2010 Capital Budget and Plan is $8.691million in additional project expenditures comprised of $4.190 million for the Rexdale Multi-Service Community Hub; and $4.501 million for the Canadian Film Centre (see Table 2). These projects have previously approved funding in the 2010 Capital Budget and Plan in the amount of $4.000 million for Rexdale Multi-Service Community Hub, and $2.000 million for Canadian Film Centre.
The total ISF budget for the Rexdale Multi-Service Community Hub, formerly Father Henry Carr Community Hub, will increase by $4.190 million to $8.190 million. Of this increase the Federal and Provincial governments have committed to fund $1.730 million and $1.530 million respectively. The balance will be funded by $0.080 million from previously approved City capital, and $0.850 million from third-party contributions. The Canadian Film Centre previously received Council approval for $2.000 million in capital works under the Windfields Restoration project. The Federal and Provincial governments have committed to fund $4.000 million, and $0.501 million will be provided through third-party contributions, for an overall budget increase of $4.501 million. No incremental increase in City funding is required. The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background Information |
City of Toronto Stimulus Project - Additional Projects (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29013.pdf) |
EX43.2 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
School Lands Property Acquisition Framework and Funding Strategy |
Origin |
(April 1, 2010) Report from the City Manager and Deputy City Manager – Cluster A |
Recommendations |
The City Manager and Deputy City Manager – Cluster A recommend that:
1. City Council endorse the School Lands Acquisition Framework in Appendix A.
2. City Council authorize funding from the land acquisition reserve in the amount of $7 million, $5 million and $3 million in each of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively, that will serve as part of the funding strategy for future school land acquisitions. |
Summary |
To recommend a school lands property acquisition framework that identifies and prioritizes properties that could be made available for sale by local school boards and the Toronto Lands Corporation (TLC) and to propose a funding strategy for the potential purchase of specific properties that have been identified as corporate priorities. |
Financial Impact |
It is expected that where there is a program interest in a school board property, divisions will reallocate priorities within their ten-year Capital Plan in order to accommodate the acquisition within their debt targets. Following the capital priority setting exercise, if capital funds are not available, it is recommended that an allocation totalling $15 million over three years, commencing in 2011 be made for strategic school board property acquisitions as described in this report. This is a maximum allocation available from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund, based on current projections and commitments. The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the Financial Impact Statement.
|
Background Information |
School Lands Property Acquisition Framework
and Funding Strategy
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29044.pdf) |
EX43.3 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Caring for Toronto Residents Displaced as a Result of Neighbourhood Emergencies: Review of Recent Events and Proposed Strategies |
Origin |
(March 30, 2010) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
Recommendations |
The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommend that:
1. Council approve the Emergency Human Services policy substantially as written in Appendix A regarding the type, scope and length of services to be provided by the City to residents displaced during an emergency, and such policy to guide the Emergency Human Services Operational Support Function in the City’s Emergency Plan.
2. The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer annually establish a non-program account, called the Emergency Human Services Expense Account, in the amount of $500,000 to fund and track expenses related to providing Emergency Human Services, and that:
a. At the recommendation of the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, the City Manager authorize the Emergency Human Services Expense Account to be accessed during an emergency incident for expenses related to providing the services outlined in Appendix A.
b. An Emergency Human Services Reserve be established to receive annual surpluses from the Emergency Human Services Expense Account and to supplement funding in the Emergency Human Services Expense Account in years in which it has a deficit as set out in Appendix B.
c. In any year in which a surplus remains in the above noted non-program account that any funds remaining in the account at year-end be transferred to the Emergency Human Services Reserve.
d. Leave be granted for the introduction of any necessary bills in Council to give effect thereto.
3. The “Mass Care” Operational Support Function in the City’s Emergency Plan be renamed and referred to as “Emergency Human Services”.
4. The provincial Ministry of Community and Social Services, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care be requested to clearly articulate what funding and supports for Emergency Human Services are available to assist the City in responding to Toronto residents displaced as a result of emergencies.
5. Legal Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and Corporate Finance, develop policies and protocols to seek to recover costs related to Emergency Human Services provided during an emergency from tenants’ and homeowners’ insurance coverage.
6. All non-union employees (excluding those in Emergency Medical Services and Fire Services) providing Emergency Human Services to displaced residents be eligible for remuneration as per the Standby/Call In/Emergency Situations Pay policy.
7. The Human Resources Division review Standby/Call In and Emergency Pay provisions for non union staff and report back to the Employee and Labour Relations Committee with any recommendations.
8. Division Heads from supporting Divisions as identified in Appendix A, at the request of the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, redeploy staff as required to support Emergency Human Services responses and to back fill as necessary in their own Divisions for the staff who have been redeployed, and such expenses to be charged to the Emergency Human Services Expense Account.
9. The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Emergency Management, be authorized to negotiate, finalize and enter into service contracts or MOU's as appropriate, and on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with community and private sector partners including the Canadian Red Cross, Salvation Army, St John Ambulance, the Greater Toronto Hotel Association and the Greater Toronto Apartment Association, detailing service agreements and/or the terms and conditions under which the City would request their assistance in providing Emergency Human Services.
10. The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, report back to Executive Committee in one year on implementation of the policy and any issues arising. |
Summary |
In the past two years, a number of neighbourhood-level emergencies have occurred which have required the City to respond to people who have been displaced from their homes for weeks or months. The emergency response provided involves assisting with emergency accommodation, food, personal support services and operation of a Reception Centre for residents displaced from their homes. Such incidents would be considered Level 1 or Level 2 emergencies in the City of Toronto Emergency Plan and do not usually result in the formal activation of the Emergency Operation Centre or the City of Toronto Emergency Plan response.
This response to neighbourhood-level emergencies has occurred in the absence of any clear policy direction from Council. Notwithstanding this, staff have come together across Divisions and in partnership with community agencies, coordinated by Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to provide services to help people under great stress in a time of crisis.
The purpose of this report is to review the response provided during the neighbourhood-level emergencies where evacuation was required that have arisen over the past two years, reflect on lessons learned, and based on these experiences propose policies and financial strategies to guide the services provided to residents displaced as a result of any future emergency |
Financial Impact |
Any cost incurred in 2010 up to $500,000 for a neighbourhood-level emergency response will be funded from within Non Program - Emergency Human Services Expense Account included in the 2010 Recommended Operating Budget. In any year in which a surplus remains (actual expenditures less than $500,000) in the above noted account, the remaining funds will be contributed to the Emergency Human Services Reserve to fund future neighbourhood-level emergencies. Funds may be recovered from other orders of government, insurance providers and other parties, where possible.
The 2010 Recommended Operating Budget for the Emergency Planning Unit of SSHA is $1,045,300 Gross and $591,400 Net. There are sufficient resources in this budget to implement the training and education initiatives outlined in this report.
|
Background Information |
Caring for Toronto Residents Displaced as a Result of Neighbourhood Emergencies: Review of Recent Events and Proposed Strategies (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29017.pdf) |
EX43.4 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 19 |
Request for a Capital Loan Guarantee for the Centre for Social Innovation |
Origin |
(April 1, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture |
Recommendations |
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture recommend that:
1. a. The City provide, to the Centre for Social Innovation’s financial institution, a guarantee of CSI’s first mortgage in the amount of $4,800,000.00 (inclusive of all interest costs payable by CSI), for a five year term commencing on May 18, 2010 until May 18, 2015.
b. The guarantee be issued subject to the CSI raising $1,328,000 from the sale of bonds and $406,000 from the sale of a community bond that will provide the equity portion of the proposed financing for the purchase of the building.
c. In accordance with the City’s Capital Loan and Line of Credit Guarantee Policy, the City enter into a tri-party agreement with CSI and its financial institution, in respect of the recommended capital loan guarantee.
2. Such guarantee and all related agreements be secured in accordance with this report and be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and that the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer be requested to negotiate appropriate and adequate safeguards, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
3. CSI provide the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer with their 2010 to 2015 inclusive audited financial statements when they become available.
4. The capital loan guarantee be deemed to be in the interest of the municipality. |
Summary |
This report seeks authority for the City to provide a $4,800,000 capital loan guarantee for the Centre for Social Innovation (“CSI”) to assist in the purchase of a five storey building located at 720 Bathurst Street that will be used to provide office and meeting spaces for various non-profit organizations and small businesses.
CSI has successfully operated a similar site in leased premises at 215 Spadina Avenue which provides space to 180 small non-profit and charitable groups as well as various socially-oriented businesses. The organization is experiencing increasing demand from citizens/communities and intends to replicate and adapt that model to the new space.
Since CSI is a not-for-profit organization with few assets, banks have made it very clear that they will require a loan guarantee from the city if CSI is able to access favourable bank rates. The capital loan guarantee being proposed is to be in effect for an initial five year term from May 18, 2010 until May 18, 2015. |
Financial Impact |
Issuance of a capital loan guarantee is considered to be a financial commitment of the City. However, there is no direct cost to the City for providing this guarantee unless the organization defaults on its obligation and the City cannot recover funds. The City will ensure that the first mortgage will be secured against the capital loan guarantee such that the City would assume control over CSI’s building in the unlikely event that CSI is not able to satisfy its commitment to its financial institution. |
Background Information |
Request for a Capital Loan Guarantee for the Centre for Social Innovation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29018.pdf) |
EX43.5 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Queen Street West Fire Site: Options for the City to Assist Redevelopment of Properties Destroyed by Fire on Traditional Shopping Streets |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The Chief Planner and Executive Director of the City Planning Division and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommend that Executive Committee:
1. Receive this report for information. |
Summary |
This report responds to Executive Committee’s request that staff report on the challenges of redeveloping properties on traditional shopping strips in Heritage Conservation Districts, particularly those destroyed by fire, and on the options available to the City to assist such redevelopment through a Community Improvement Plan (CIP), including grants, loans and land assembly, as well as through general tax policy.
The City could use a CIP to address challenges facing owners who wish to redevelop properties on traditional shopping streets, but it would require either direct funding from the City’s operating budget or forgoing a portion of the property taxes from this new commercial development. Given these considerations staff do not support providing any special assistance to the owners of the Queen Street West fire site to redevelop their properties. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial impacts arising from this report. |
Background Information |
Queen Street West Fire Site: Options for the City to Assist Redevelopment of Properties Destroyed by Fire on Traditional Shopping Streets (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29028.pdf) |
EX43.6 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Toronto Atmospheric Fund Statement of Investment Objectives and Principles - 2010 |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
Recommendations |
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:
1. Council approve the attached “Statement of Investment Objectives and Principles” as approved by TAF’s Board of Directors (Appendix A). |
Summary |
At its meeting held on March 8, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) approved the attached “Statement of Investment Objectives and Principles” (SIOP) (Schedule A) and requested the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to submit the statement to Council for approval.
TAF’s Investment Committee developed the SIOP over the past year with the support of staff. This revised policy establishes a more integrated and mandate-oriented approach to investing TAF’s assets.
Upon approval by City Council, this Statement will replace the Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures that was approved in 2007. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact occurring from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
Toronto Atmospheric Fund Statement of Investment
Objectives and Principles
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29030.pdf) |
EX43.7 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Delegation of Authority in Certain Real Estate Matters |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
Recommendations |
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:
1. City Council delegate the approving and signing authorities in real estate matters as set out in Appendix A.
2. In respect of the exercise of delegated authority to dispose of land, City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act, authorize staff to whom authority to dispose of land is being delegated, to dispose of lands acquired by expropriation without giving the owner from whom the land was expropriated the first chance to repurchase the land on the terms of the best offer received by the expropriating authority, if the expropriation has taken place ten years or more prior to the proposed disposal.
3. In respect of the acquisition of contaminated lands by means other than the development review process, City Council rescind the policy adopted by the former City of Toronto entitled “Environmental Issues – Real Property Acquisitions” as set out in Clause 46 of Report No. 11 of the Executive Committee at its meeting of June 21, and 22, 1993, and the former City of Etobicoke “Policy and Procedures for Dealing with Contaminated or Potentially Contaminated Sites”, adopted by the former Etobicoke Council meeting on September 15, 1997, together with any other subsisting policies from the legacy municipalities.
4. City Council rescind the delegated authorities in real estate matters referred to in Appendix B.
5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to introduce in Council any bills necessary to give effect to the foregoing. |
Summary |
For the purposes of relieving Committee and Council Agendas of frequently routine real estate reports, facilitating situations involving critical deadlines, improving the stage on which the City conducts its real estate transactions, and avoiding delay in the implementation of approved transactions, staff is recommending that Council delegate authority to approve and sign certain real estate matters where funding has been made available in an approved budget. Such delegation will also co-ordinate, consolidate and harmonize various delegations previously approved by Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact as a result of this report. It is a pre-condition to the exercise of any delegated authority that all required funding be available in an approved budget.
|
Background Information |
Delegation of Authority in Certain Real Estate Matters (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29031.pdf) |
EX43.8 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Authority to Enter into Lease Agreement and Biogas Utilization Agreement with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd. - Green Lane Landfill |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Chief Corporate Officer |
Recommendations |
The General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Chief Corporate Officer recommend that:
1. Authority be granted for the City to enter into a Lease Agreement with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd., for the lease of approximately 0.5 Hectare of the Green Lane Landfill buffer lands , substantially on the terms set out in Attachment 1 and such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services be authorized severally to execute the Lease Agreement on behalf of the City.
2. Authority be granted for the City to enter into a Biogas Utilization Agreement with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd., substantially on the terms set out in Attachment 2 and such other terms as may be satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services be authorized to execute the Biogas Utilization Agreement on behalf of the City.
3. Subject to the adoption of Recommendation 1, authority be granted for the City to enter into any other related agreement(s) as may be necessary to give effect to Recommendation 1, on terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the Chief Corporate Officer be authorized to execute any such agreements on behalf of the City.
4. Subject to the adoption of Recommendation 2, authority be granted for the City to enter into any other related agreement(s) as may be necessary to give effect to Recommendation 2, on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services be authorized to execute any such agreements on behalf of the City.
5. In the event that the Lease Agreement and the Biogas Utilization Agreement referred to in Recommendations 1 and 2 are not executed by 01 January 2011, the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services be authorized, in his sole discretion, to terminate negotiations with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd. and to issue a Request for Proposals for a contract to develop and operate a system to utilize biogas from the Green Lane Landfill.
6. The Chief Corporate Officer, in consultation with the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, be authorized to provide consent on behalf of the City, as landlord, for the submission of any applications required to be submitted by Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd. for land use approvals in respect of the lands to be leased.
7. The General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services be authorized to provide consent on behalf of the City for the submission of any applications to the Ontario Ministry of Environment for any required environmental approvals.
8. The Chief Corporate Officer be authorized to administer and manage the Lease Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.
9. The General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services be authorized to administer and manage the Biogas Utilization Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.
|
Summary |
At its meeting on November 30, December 1, 2, 4 and 7, 2009, City Council directed the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to enter into sole source negotiations with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd., in partnership, (herein referred to as “THESI/OPPL”) for a contract to design, build, own and operate a new cogeneration system to utilize the landfill gas from the Green Lane Landfill and to report back to City Council on the results of the negotiations.
The purpose of this report is to report on the results of the negotiations with THESI/OPPL and obtain City Council authority to enter into a Lease Agreement and a Biogas Utilization Agreement with THESI/OPPL to lease approximately 0.5 Ha of the Green Lane Landfill buffer lands to THESI/OPPL and to supply to THESI/OPPL the landfill gas generated by the Green Lane Landfill, and possible future quantities of digester gas that may be produced at a mixed waste processing facility that may be constructed on the buffer lands, for the construction and operation of a new biogas utilization system to convert biogas into electricity and heat.
|
Financial Impact | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THESI/OPPL will design, construct, own and operate the entire biogas utilization system and will incur all associated capital and operating expenses over the term of the Lease Agreement and the Biogas Utilization Agreement.
These agreements will generate revenue for the City and will not result in additional capital or operating costs for the City.
The City will lease land to THESI/OPPL for the purpose of locating the compressor plant, a portion of the biogas pipeline and, possibly, a generation plant. The City will also supply biogas to THESI/OPPL which THESI/OPPL will convert into electricity and heat.
Lease Revenue
THESI/OPPL will lease approximately 0.5 hectare (or 53,820 square feet) of vacant buffer land of the Green Lane Landfill ("GLL") from the City for an initial term of 25 years. In the first year of the term, the annual rent payment will be approximately $32,292.00. The annual rental payment will be increased by 2.5 percent for each of the subsequent years of the term and the 10 year extension term, if THESI/OPPL exercises its option to extend the term. The estimated total rental payment revenue for the term and the extension term is $1,773,741.00. THESI/OPPL will be responsible for all capital and operational costs, so that the lease will be fully net and carefree to the City.
Biogas Royalty Revenue
Under the Biogas Utilization Agreement, beginning in the month in which the cogeneration plant begins operations, which is expected to be July 2013, and in each month of the term thereafter, THESI/OPPL will pay to the City a variable royalty payment. The amount of the variable royalty payment will be a percentage (the "royalty percentage") of the gross revenue received by THESI/OPPL from the sale of electricity produced from biogas supplied by the City.
The monthly variable royalty payment amounts are expected to vary over the term due to changes in the gross revenue received by THESI/OPPL from the sale of the electricity and also due to the tiered structure of royalty percentages.
The amount of electricity which THESI/OPPL will be able to sell will vary due to changes in the quantity and quality of biogas supplied by the City, and possibly also due to unplanned interruptions in THESI/OPPL’s ability to utilize the biogas or sell the electricity.
The Biogas Utilization Agreement will establish four tiers of royalty percentage based on the quantity and methane content of the biogas supplied by the City. The highest royalty percentage will apply when the quantity of biogas supplied by the City is near its expected maximum amount and the methane content of the biogas is 45 per cent by volume or greater. Lower royalty percentages will apply when lesser quantities of biogas are supplied or when the methane content of the biogas is less than 45 per cent by volume.
The City and THESI/OPPL have reviewed a financial model of the Biogas Utilization Agreement which applies the variable royalty payment structure described above to the expected implementation schedule of the cogeneration and generation plants and the forecasted future variation in the quantity of biogas available. Based on this analysis, the annual totals of the monthly variable royalty payments due to the City, beginning in 2013 and over the remainder of the term of the Agreement, are expected to vary from approximately $1,500,000.00 to $2,300,000.00. The estimated total variable royalty payment for the term excluding the extension period is $42,679,000.00.
The rental income and variable royalty payments to the City over the term are summarized in Table 1. Estimates of biogas volume derive from a study commissioned by Solid Waste Management Services in 2009, which considered the quantities and types of waste expected to be disposed of at the GLL over its remaining life. Electricity sales were calculated assuming normal losses when converting biogas into electricity and the electricity purchase price currently offered by the OPA’s FIT Program applied to all electricity produced from the biogas over the term. The average royalty percentage reflects the top tier royalty percentage which is considered to be reasonable over the term based on current landfill gas production.
Table 1: Summary of Rental Income and Variable Royalty Payments
Notes: 1. Includes electricity sales in years 2013 to 2015 only. Construction of the biogas utilization system will occur in years 2011 and 2012. Sale of electricity from the cogeneration plant is expected to begin in 2013.
2. Includes electricity sales in years 2013 and 2032 only. The 20-year term of the FIT program contract for electricity from the cogeneration plant will expire in 2032. A different and unknown purchase price will apply to electricity sold in year 2033 and beyond. Electricity revenues expected in 2033 and beyond cannot be estimated at this time and are ‘To be Determined’ and are therefore excluded from this table.
The variable royalty payments will be allocated to the operating budget of the Solid Waste Management Services under the item Disposal Services, Green Lane Landfill account SW0901. Any resultant net operating surplus will be contributed to the Green Lane Landfill Reserve Fund. The rental revenue payments will be allocated to the operating budget of the Real Estate Services Division under the cost centre FA2490.
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background Information |
Report - Authority to Enter into Lease Agreement and Biogas Utilization Agreement with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and Ontario Plants Propagation Ltd. - Green Lane Landfill (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-28995.pdf) Attachment 1 - Commercial Terms of Lease Agreement at Green Lane Landfill Site (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-28996.pdf) Attachment 2 - Commercial Terms of Biogas Utilization Agreement at Green Lane Landfill Site (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-28997.pdf) Attachment 3 - Location of Proposed Leased Lands (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-28998.pdf) Attachment 4 - Proposed Biogas Utilization System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-28999.pdf) |
EX43.9 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Home Energy Assistance Toronto: Energy Efficiency Program for Low-Income Residents |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Environment Office |
Recommendations |
The Director, Toronto Environment Office recommends that City Council:
1. Authorize the Director, Toronto Environment Office to negotiate and execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Enbridge Gas and Toronto Hydro to deliver a joint low-income home energy efficiency program for Toronto in 2010 and 2011, on the terms and conditions described in Appendix A of this report and otherwise on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Toronto Environment Office and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. Request the Director of the Environment Office to report back on any changes to the program if there are new partnership opportunities or programs in this sector from the Ontario Government or the Ontario Power Authority, or if there are further changes to the Federal ecoEnergy or Enbridge Home Weatherization programs. |
Summary |
This report recommends the establishment of new partnership between the City of Toronto, Toronto Hydro and Enbridge Gas to jointly deliver a low-income low-rise home energy retrofit program that addresses electricity, gas and water conservation. City Council approved $2 million in funding for this initiative in August 2009, as part of a $9 million commitment to a Live Green Toronto Home Energy Efficiency program.
Low-income residents, including a large proportion of seniors with fixed incomes, have inherent difficulty financing and undertaking home energy retrofits. The proposed program would help to overcome this barrier, build on existing energy conservation programs and complement various initiatives to assist low-income residents.
Funding from the City would expand the range of conservation measures in a program that Enbridge currently offers to the low-income sector. The additional funds would allow for deeper retrofits such as additional insulation, heating equipment upgrades and subsidizing the cost of home energy assessments so that the partners can leverage Provincial grant monies. The City would also support water efficiency improvements such as low-flow toilet installation.
The program would be a one-stop service managed by the third party Delivery Agent who currently delivers the Enbridge program. The Delivery Agent would undertake the initial eligibility screening, energy assessments, co-ordination of the retrofit process and the completion of reports required for the Provincial grant program. This joint partnership approach would ensure that the allocation of pooled resources is efficiently administered and optimized to achieve maximum greenhouse gas emission reductions.
|
Financial Impact |
This program will utilize up to $2.0 million from the $9.0 million previously approved by City Council for a Live Green Toronto Home Energy Efficiency Incentive Program on August 5-6th, 2009. There is no new impact from this program.
The $9.0 million approved for the Home Energy Efficiency Incentive Program is drawn from the Home Energy Assistance Toronto Reserve Fund. Funding in the amount of $2.0 million is included in the Toronto Environment Office’s 2010 Recommended Operating Budget and $3.0 million and $3.5 million will be included in the 2011 and 2012 submissions respectively. The Low Income Home Energy Program described by this report will utilize up to $0.7 million in 2010 and $1.3 million in 2011.
The program will leverage investments of approximately $1.0 million from Enbridge Gas and $400,000 from Toronto Hydro or approximately $3,000 and $700 per home, respectively. The program has also been designed to leverage funding from the Provincial government’s Home Energy Savings Program which currently offers up to $5,000 for home energy retrofits. An average City investment of $6,500 per home is expected to leverage anywhere from $250 - $1,250 in Provincial grants returned to the City, depending on the particular measures selected. Based on a targeted 300 home retrofits, this would generate an estimated $75,000 – $375,000 in Provincial grants which would be returned to the Home Energy Assistance Toronto Reserve Fund for future energy conservation initiatives. The program may also potentially leverage funding available from the Federal Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program for some of the participating homes, up to a maximum of $16,000 per home for basic health and safety improvements which would include furnace replacements.
To avoid duplicated administrative effort, the City will spend approximately $2,000 per month, up to approximately $38,000, drawn from the $2.0 million approved for the program, to cover Enbridge's incremental administration expenses on behalf of the City. As part of the agreement established between the parties, the City will not be liable for cost overruns in the retrofit process. $30,000 for the development of program materials and implementation of the communication and outreach strategy is included in the TEO's 2010 Recommended Operating Budget.
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.
|
Background Information |
Report - Home Energy Assistance Toronto - Energy Efficiency Program for Low-Income Residents (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29000.pdf) |
EX43.10 | Information |
|
|
Ward: All |
Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and of Council Appointees to Agencies, Boards, Commission, Corporations and Other Special Purpose Bodies for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
Origin |
(March 18, 2010) Report from the Treasurer and City Clerk |
Summary |
This report is submitted for information purposes as required under Section 223 (1) of the City of Toronto Act 2006. It provides an itemized statement on Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and of Council Appointees to Agencies, Boards, Commission, Corporations (ABCCs) and other Special Purpose Bodies for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications arising from this report.
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.
|
Background Information |
Report - Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and of Council Appointees to Agencies, Boards, Commission, Corporations and Other Special Purpose Bodies for the year ended December 31, 2009 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29002.pdf) Appendices A to H - City of Toronto Remuneration and Benefits for Members of Council for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29003.pdf) |
EX43.11 | ACTION |
|
|
|
City Council – New Business – CC46.1 – Open Meeting Investigation: Request to Investigate 2008-2009 Budget Committee Process |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Letter from the Budget Committee |
Recommendations |
The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:
1. City Council discontinue the Committee briefings stage of the budget process.
2. City Council request the City Manager to report to the first meeting of the new Executive Committee on a process for the 2011 budget which will ensure compliance with COTA and the Procedures By-law.
3. City Council request the City Manager in preparing his report, to also include some options in terms of the budget process, having canvassed interested Councillors. |
Summary |
The Budget Committee on March 29, 2010, considered a letter (February 26, 2010) from the City Clerk, entitled " City Council – New Business – CC46.1 – Open Meeting Investigation: Request to Investigate 2008-2009 Budget Committee Process". |
Background Information |
Letter - City Council - New Business - CC46.1 - Open Meeting Investigation - Request to Investigate 2008-2009 Budget Committee Process (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29004.pdf) |
EX43.12 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Preliminary Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Letter from the Budget Committee |
Recommendations |
The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:
1. City Council approve the budget and technical adjustments to its 2009 Approved Capital Budget as detailed in Appendix 2 attached to the report (March 22, 2010) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
2. City Council approve carry forward funding for unspent 2009 capital projects totalling $180.326 million gross and funding sources as detailed in Appendix 3.1 to the report (March 22, 2010) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in order to continue work on 2009 approved capital projects, and that the 2010 Approved Capital Budget be increased accordingly with no incremental impact on debt funding.
3. City Council approve carry forward funding for unspent 2008 and prior year capital projects totalling $17.445 million with no incremental increase to the 2010 Council approved debt funding as detailed in Appendix 3.2 to the report (March 22, 2010) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and that the 2010 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly.
4. City Council approve the closure of completed capital projects detailed in Appendix 4 to the report (March 22, 2010) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and that uncommitted funds from under-spent completed projects be utilized to fund overspent completed projects with no incremental impact on debt, after which any remaining unspent funds be returned to the original funding source.
5. City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report back to the Budget Committee on any changes to the City of Toronto’s 2009 year-end financial position after the external audit of the 2009 financial statements is finalized, if necessary.
|
Summary |
The Budget Committee on March 29, 2010, considered a report (March 22, 2010) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, entitled "Preliminary Capital Variance Report for the Year ended December 31, 2009". |
Background Information |
Letter - Preliminary Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29005.pdf) Appendix 1 - Consolidated Capital Variance Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29007.pdf) Appendix 1.1 - Consolidated Capital Variance Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 - SOGR (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29008.pdf) Appendix 2 - Budget and Technical Adjustments for Quarter Ended December 31, 2009 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29009.pdf) Appendix 3.1 - 2009 Carry Forwards Funding Adjustments Appendix 3.2 - 2008 Carry Forwards Funding Adjustments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29010.pdf) Appendix 4 - Capital Projects Recommended for Closure (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29011.pdf) |
EX43.13 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Transportation Services – 2010 Cash Flow Reallocations and Deferrals Progress Report No. 2 |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Letter from the Budget Committee |
Recommendations |
The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:
1. City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in the Transportation Services’ 2010 Capital Budget and 2011-2019 Capital Plan in the amount of $13,000,000, with cash flows in the amount of $3,150,000 for 2010 and $9,850,000 for 2011 detailed in Table 1, Part A, attached to the report (February 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, with a zero gross and net impact.
2. City Council authorize the decrease in project costs and corresponding cash flow in 2010, in the amount of $5,000,000 detailed in Table 1, Part B, attached to the report (February 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, resulting in a reduction of $5,000,000 gross, zero net of the 2010 Approved Budget for Transportation Services.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
|
Summary |
The Budget Committee on March 29, 2010, considered a report (February 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, entitled "Transportation Services – 2010 Cash Flow Reallocations and Deferrals Progress Report No. 2". |
Background Information |
Letter - Transportation Services- 2010 Cash Flow Reallocations and Deferrals Progress Report No. 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29035.pdf) Table 1 - Transportation Services Division Capital Budget Reallocation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29037.pdf) |
EX43.14 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Facilities Management and Real Estate – 2010 Capital Plan Adjustments |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Letter from the Budget Committee |
Recommendations |
The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:
1. City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in the 2010 approved Facilities Management and Real Estate capital budget in the amount of $1.351 million, as illustrated in Appendix 1 of the report (March 2, 2010) from the Chief Corporate Officer, with zero gross and net impact.
|
Summary |
The Budget Committee on March 29, 2010, considered a report (March 2, 2010) from the Chief Corporate Officer, entitled "Facilities Management and Real Estate – 2010 Capital Plan Adjustments".
|
Background Information |
Letter - Facilities Management and Real Estate - 2010 Capital Plan Adjustments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29039.pdf) |
EX43.15 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project – Request for Full Project Commitment Approval |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Letter from the Budget Committee |
Recommendations |
The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:
1. City Council approve additional project commitments of $1.334 billion, as per the revised Attachment A to the letter (March 25, 2010) from the General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission, for the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension project, bringing total commitments to $1.819 billion, to enable the Toronto Transit Commission to award contracts required to continue work on this fully-funded, stand-alone, project until March 2011.
2. The Toronto Transit Commission request any additional commitments required for future work as part of the 2011-2020 Capital Budget and Plan and in future capital budgets as necessary.
3. City Council request the Province to make a clear commitment to transit Operating and Capital funding in accordance with the City's 10-year Capital Plan. |
Summary |
The Budget Committee on March 29, 2010, considered the following:
- (March 25, 2010) letter from the General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission, entitled "Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project – Request for Full Project Commitment Approval".
- (March 25, 2010) letter from General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission submitting a table respecting the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Estimated Commitments – March 2010 to Completion, breaking out the project budget into major categories.
|
Background Information |
Letter - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project - request for Full Project commitment Approval (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29019.pdf) Toronto Transit Commission Report No. 11 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29020.pdf) Table - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) Commitments - March 2010 to Completion (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29021.pdf) |
EX43.16 | ACTION |
|
|
|
2009 Rent Reduction for Lease and Licence Agreements Due to the Impact of the Labour Disruption |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Letter from the Budget Committee |
Recommendations |
The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:
1. City Council grant authority to reduce the 2009 fixed rent receivables for the properties noted in Appendix “A” of the report (March 3, 2010) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation for existing Lease and Licence Agreements within the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Business Services Unit to offset the financial loss incurred due to the 2009 labour disruption, for an overall reduction of $831,064.
2. City Council grant authority to reduce the rent to those tenants listed in Appendix “A” of the report (March 3, 2010) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation after payment in full of any outstanding rent and related property tax.
|
Summary |
The Budget Committee on March 29, 2010, considered a report (March 3, 2010) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, entitled "2009 Rent Reduction for Lease and Licence Agreements Due to the Impact of the Labour Disruption". |
Background Information |
Letter - 2009 Rent Reduction for Lease and Licence Agreements Due to the Impact of the Labour Disruption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29025.pdf) |
EX43.17 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Toronto Police Service– Taxi Working Group |
Origin |
(February 19, 2010) Report from the Acting Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
Recommendations |
The Acting Chair, Toronto Police Services Board, recommends that:
1. The Executive Committee review this report and the appended Taxi Working Group Minutes with respect to any improvements the City may wish to make to the by-law governing the taxi industry in Toronto. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the Executive Committee with the results of the Toronto Police Service’s Taxi Working Group for consideration with respect to any improvements that the City may wish to make to the by-law governing the taxi industry in Toronto. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications related to the recommendation contained within this report. |
Background Information |
Report - Toronto Police Service - Taxi Working Group (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29026.pdf) |
EX43.18 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Toronto Police Service: Response to the Feasibility of Utilizing the Denver Boot as a Means of Enforcing Parking Restrictions for Tour Buses on Queens Quay |
Origin |
(February 22, 2010) Report from the Acting Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the Executive Committee with the Toronto Police Service’s response to the feasibility of utilizing the Denver Boot as a means of enforcing parking restrictions for tour buses on Queens Quay. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications in regard to the receipt of this report. |
Background Information |
Report - Toronto Police Service - Response to the Feasibility of Utilizing the Denver Boot as a Means of Enforcing Parking Restrictions for Tour Buses on Queens Quay (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29027.pdf) |
EX43.19 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Toronto Police Service – 2009 Parking Enforcement Unit Tag Issuance |
Origin |
(March 17, 2010) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Toronto - Executive Committee with the Toronto Police Service - Parking Enforcement Unit’s 2009 annual report on tag issuance. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications in regard to the receipt of this report. |
Background Information |
Report - Toronto Police Service - 2009 Parking Enforcement Unit Tag Issuance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29029.pdf) |
EX43.20 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Toronto Police Service: Renewal of the Community Policing Partnership Program Grant Agreement |
Origin |
(March 24, 2010) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Police Services Board, the Chair of the Board, Alok Mukherjee, recommends that:
1. City of Toronto Council authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Community Policing Partnership (CPP) Agreement with the Province and the Toronto Police Services Board, on terms and conditions substantially similar to those contained in the previous CPP Grant Program Agreement with the Province, subject to approval as to form by the City Solicitor. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request the Executive Committee to submit a recommendation to City Council to authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Community Policing Partnership (CPP) Program Agreement between the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto, and the Toronto Police Services Board for a further two-year period – April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2012. This Agreement, received in March 2010, replaces the current agreement, which expires on March 31, 2010.
Under the CPP Program, the Toronto Police Service (TPS) receives grant funding of up to $7.53 million annually to cover a portion of the salaries and benefits of up to 251 officers. Although the program is on-going, a formal agreement is entered into every two years. Revenue of $7.53 million is built into the TPS budget each year for the CPP grant program. In order to maximize the amount of funding received, TPS must maintain its uniform staffing levels at a predetermined benchmark of at least 5,180 officers. Uniform staffing levels have been maintained above this benchmark every year since the inception of the CPP Program in 1998 and the current authorized uniform strength is 5,618.
|
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact beyond what has already been approved in the current year’s budget for the Toronto Police Service.
As the CPP Program is an on-going program, grant funding, estimated at $7.53 million, is included as revenue in the 2010 Toronto Police Service Operating Budget. Entering into a renewal agreement with the Province in respect of the CPP Program will have no further financial implications or impact; however, failing to enter into the Agreement would result in loss of revenue of $7.53 million annually for the Board and the City with respect to the 251 officers that are partially funded through the grant program.
The renewal of the CPP Program Agreement with the Province does not commit the City to any additional expenditures. Although it does require the City to cover salary expenses not covered by the grant, these expenditures are included in the Service’s operating budget and would be incurred, regardless, if the Service is to maintain its uniform staffing levels at the current authorized strength of 5,618.
|
Background Information |
Report - Toronto Police Service - Renewal of the Community Policing Partnership Program Grant Agreement (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29033.pdf) |
EX43.21 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: All |
Toronto Police Service: Renewal of the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Grant Agreement |
Origin |
(March 24, 2010) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Police Services Board, the Chair of the Board, Alok Mukherjee, recommends that:
1. Toronto City Council authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement with the Province and the Toronto Police Services Board, on terms and conditions substantially similar to those contained in the previous Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement with the Province, subject to approval as to form by the City Solicitor. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request the City’s Executive Committee to submit a recommendation to Toronto City Council to authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement between the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto and the Toronto Police Services Board for a further two-year period – April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2012. This Agreement, received in March, 2010, replaces the current agreement, which expired on March 31, 2010.
Under the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program, the Toronto Police Service (TPS) receives grant funding of up to $8.75 million annually to cover a portion of the salaries and benefits of up to 250 officers. Although the program is on-going, a formal agreement is entered into every two years. Revenue of $8.75 million is built into the TPS budget each year for this grant program. In order to maximize the amount of funding received, TPS must maintain its uniform staffing levels at a predetermined benchmark of at least 5,510 officers. Uniform staffing levels have been maintained above this benchmark and the current authorized uniform strength is 5,618. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact beyond what has already been approved in the current year’s budget for the Toronto Police Service.
As the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program is an on-going program, grant funding, estimated at $8.75 million, is included as revenue in the 2010 Toronto Police Service Operating Budget. Entering into a renewal agreement with the Province in respect of the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program will have no further financial implications or impact; however, failing to enter into the Agreement would result in loss of revenue of $8.75 million annually for the Board and the City with respect to the 250 officers that are partially funded through the grant program.
The renewal of the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement with the Province does not commit the City to any additional expenditures. Although it does require the City to cover salary expenses not covered by the grant, these expenditures would be incurred, regardless, if the Service is to maintain its uniform staffing levels at the authorized strength of 5,618. |
Background Information |
Report - Toronto Police Service - Renewal of the Safer Communities - 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Grant Agreement (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29034.pdf) |
EX43.22 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Accessible Transit Services Plan: 2009 Status Report |
Origin |
(February 24, 2010) Letter from the General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission |
Recommendations |
Summary |
Letter from the General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission, forwarding to City of Toronto Council, through the Executive Committee for information, the action taken by the Toronto Transit Commission with regards to the “Accessible Transit Services Plan: 2009 Status Report.” |
Financial Impact |
This report has no effect on the TTC's operating or capital budgets. |
Background Information |
Accessible Transit Services Plan: 2009 Status Repor (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29036.pdf) |
EX43.23 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Budget Briefing for Mayoralty and Councillor Candidates |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Letter from Councillor Thompson and Councillor Walker |
Recommendations |
Councillors Thompson and Walker recommend that:
1. City Council request the City Manager to arrange a briefing session on the City’s operating budget for all; mayoralty and councillor candidates prior to the April 15 – 16 City Council meeting. |
Summary |
To encourage informed public debate during the 2010 municipal election year, it is essential that all candidates have a clear understanding of Toronto’s current financial position. A briefing session for all mayoralty and councillor candidates presented by City staff will provide the in-depth budget information candidates need to prepare informed policy position on the key issues. |
Background Information |
Budget Briefing for Mayoralty and Councillor Candidates (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29032.pdf) |
EX43.24 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Renewal Energy in The City of Toronto |
Origin |
(March 31, 2010) Letter from Councillor Ainslie and Councillor Ashton |
Recommendations |
Councillors Ainslie and Ashton recommend that:
1. The City of Toronto urges the Province of Ontario to place a moratorium on any new industrial Wind Turbine agreements and on the issuance of new permits to operate Industrial Wind Turbine facilities until a comprehensive, public, science-based study of the adverse health effects now being reported by Ontarians can be evaluated and their potential harmful health effects fully understood.
2. The necessary regulations be put in place to ensure no Ontarians is further subjected to determined harmful health hazards in the proximity of Industrial Wind Turbine installations including but not limited to such mitigating measure as mandatory, precautionary setbacks.
3. The City of Toronto consider how best to open timely communication with the Province of Ontario on IWT’s to ensure that its Ministries acknowledge the seriousness of the concerns expressed herein and that serious consideration be given to the need for a moratorium.
4. This resolution be forwarded to the Office of the Premier of Ontario, the various involved ministries and Agencies of the Province of Ontario, the office of the Prime Minister of Canada, The Association of Municipalities of Ontario, The Rural Ontario Municipal Association, The Federation of Canadian Municipalities, local MP’s and MPP’s and area municipalities. |
Summary |
The Province of Ontario has enacted the Green Energy Act, 2009 with the stated goals of building a stronger, greener economy, creating well-paying green jobs, better protecting our environment, combating climate change and creating a healthier future.
A persistent and growing number of Ontarians have expressed serious and numerous concerns regarding the impacts of Industrial Wind Turbines on their health, lifestyle, the operation of their businesses and on their property values.
More than 50 municipalities throughout Ontario have passed resolutions expressing significant concerns that the goals of the Green Energy Act, 2009 to provide safe, economic and environmentally responsible renewable energy may not be achieved through the deployment of Industrial Wind Turbine technology.
The Green Energy Act, 2009 has excluded these municipalities from acting in any direct way to address concerns relating to the public interests in comprehensive municipal planning, public health, infrastructure expansion and environmental assessment and thereby limiting their ability to manage the impacts of wind power projects on their communities.
The Province is in the early stages of deploying Industrial Wind Turbine Technology which, at present is contributing a limited benefit to Ontario’s total renewable energy needs and as such is at an opportune point to pause further deployment to investigate these public concerns. Any potential loss of green house gas emission reductions can be realized through existing zero emission generating capacity.
The Act now places the onus on concerned Ontarians to demonstrate the validity and the severity of their concerns rather than on the Province or the applicant in matters of appeal. The Province has shown limited acknowledgment of these concerns through the long term funding of a research chair to monitor and research possible health impacts of renewable energy.
The County of Simcoe has passed a resolution in support of a moratorium on wind energy projects until a health study has been completed by an independent third party. It would be a responsible route for the City of Toronto to take and support.
|
Background Information |
Renewal Energy in The City of Toronto (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29038.pdf) |
EX43.25 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Update: Affordable Housing Program – Economic Stimulus Funding |
Origin |
(April 8, 2010) Letter from the Affiordable Housing Committee |
Recommendations |
The Affordable Housing Committee recommended to the Executive Committee, for its meeting on April 19, 2010 that:
1. City Council request the Chair of the Affordable Housing Committee to write the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and acknowledge the support of the provincial government in approving Council recommended affordable housing developments.
2. City Council request the Chair of the Affordable Housing Committee to also urge the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to approve any Council recommended affordable housing developments that are as yet unfunded in year two of the economic stimulus Affordable Housing Program initiative.
3. The 2010 Recommended Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration be adjusted to include the funding for the development loans/grants for the projects identified in this report.
4. The 2010 Recommended Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration be adjusted to include the funding for the loans from the Home Ownership Program identified in this report. |
Summary |
The Affordable Housing Committee on April 8, 2010, considered a report (March 24, 2010) from Sue Corke, Deputy City Manager advising that City Council at its meeting of September 30 and October 1, 2009, requested that the Director, Affordable Housing Office, report back to the Budget Committee and the Affordable Housing Committee on which Council-approved economic stimulus affordable housing developments had been recommended for funding by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, while also including current year and future year budget implications. |
Background Information |
Update: Affordable Housing Program ý Economic Stimulus Funding
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29129.pdf) |
EX43.26 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Standardizing City Support for New Assisted Ownership Housing Opportunities |
Origin |
(April 8, 2010) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee |
Recommendations | |
The Affordable Housing Committee recommended to the Executive Committee, for its meeting on April 19, 2010 that:
|
|
Summary |
The Affordable Housing Committee on April 8, 2010, considered a report (March 24, 2010) from Sue Corke, Deputy City Manager and Cam Weldon, Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, which proposes standardizing the City’s approach to supporting assisted home ownership by establishing a policy governing grants funded from the City’s Development Charges Reserve Account (2009) for Subsidized Housing (account number XR 2116).
|
Background Information |
Standardizing City Support for New Assisted Ownership Housing Opportunities
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29144.pdf) |
EX43.27 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Increasing Homeowners' Access to the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP) |
Origin |
(April 8, 2010) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee |
Recommendations | |
The Affordable Housing Committee recommended to the Executive Committee, for its meeting on April 19, 2010 that:
|
|
Summary |
The Affordable Housing Committee on April 8, 2010, considered a report (March 24, 2010) from Sue Corke, Deputy City Manager, responding to a request from the Chair of the Affordable Housing Committee, Councillor Mammoliti, to summarize the demographics of Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP) clients; to outline what the City has done to address RRAP house value limits; and to discuss a protocol for Councillors to assist in RRAP applications.
|
Background Information |
Increasing Homeowners' Access to the Residential Rehabilitation
Assistance Program (RRAP)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29119.pdf) |
EX43.28 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Status Report on Property Rental Requirements to Meet the Toronto Police Service's Operational and Security Obligations for the 2010 G8 and G20 Summits |
Origin |
(April 1, 2010) Letter from City Council |
Summary |
City Council on March 31 and April 1, 2010, in adopting, as amended, Government Management Committee Item GM29.22, headed "Property Rental Requirements to Meet Toronto Police Service Operational/Security Obligations for the 2010 G8/G20 Summits" requested the Chief Corporate Officer to provide a status report on this matter to the April 19, 2010 meeting of the Executive Committee |
Background Information |
Status Report on Property Rental Requirements to Meet the Toronto Police Service's Operational and Security Obligations for the 2010 G8 and G20 Summits (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-29168.pdf) |