Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

Special Assistance for Members of the Public:  City staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call 416-394-8101, TTY 416-338-0889 or e-mail etcc@toronto.ca.

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If the Etobicoke York Community Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the committee must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Committee has to meet privately. (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

Notice to people writing or making presentations to the Etobicoke York Community Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

The City videotapes committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be videotaping you and City staff may make the video tapes available to the public.

If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or by calling 416-394-8101.

 Timed Items

10:00 a.m.        EY38.1, EY38.2, EY38.3, EY38.4, EY38.5

10:30 a.m.        EY38.6, EY38.28, EY38.29, EY38.30, EY38.31

11:45 a.m.        EY38.33, EY38.34, EY38.35 

 Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Bill to Confirm the Proceedings of Community Council will be last items.

Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Confirmation of Minutes – May 25, 2010

Speakers/Presentations – A complete list will be distributed at the meeting.

The City Solicitor recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.         Enact the draft By-law.

To name the private street at 940, 980 and 1100 Lansdowne Avenue, as “Turntable Crescent”.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            City Council amend the Zoning By-law for the lands at 50 Resources Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8.

2.            City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision as may be required.

3.            In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 2, subject to:

a.         the conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision as set out in Attachment 9 must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration;

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development; and

c.         the approval of the Draft Plan of Subdivision not be issued until the Zoning By-law is in full force and effect.

4.            Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment:

a.            the owner enter into a legal agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the community benefits outlined in this report;

b.            the owner enter into a Subdivision Agreement as set out in the conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision; and

c.            the Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Approval be issued.

This application is to amend the Class One Industrial (I.C1) zoning of the property to permit the development of a 16,230.5 square metre large-format home improvement retail store (including an attached accessory garden centre of 3,060.1 square metres).  The applicant has included on the plans, for illustration purposes only, additional uses currently permitted on the lands.  The application proposes to delete certain incompatible uses from the IC.1 zoning that applies on the lands not occupied by the large-format retail store.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

At its meeting of April 27, 2010, Etobicoke York Community Council deferred consideration of the Final Report related to these applications to its meeting of June 22, 2010.  Community Council directed that a third-party/peer review be prepared by a market consultant and requested the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to report on the results of the peer review analysis at the continuation of the statutory meeting.

The consultant’s findings and conclusions are found in the attached report, prepared by W. Scott Morgan & Associates Limited.  In addition, Mr. Morgan will present a verbal synopsis of the report and answer any questions from Community Council at the June 22, 2010 meeting.

Since the April 27, 2010 Etobicoke York Community Council meeting, Lowes has submitted a Site Plan Control application and has made significant progress toward resolving technical issues related to the Draft Plan of Subdivision.  Further discussions have been held to clarify the proposed zoning by-law.

On the basis of those discussions and the progress made on technical matters, staff are recommending adoption of the revised zoning by-law and draft approval of the Draft Plan of Subdivision at this time.  The revisions to these documents, (Attachment 2 and 3 to this report) are considered minor and technical in nature.  Staff also recommend that conditions 4 (b) and (c) in the Final Report be deleted.  Those conditions require the signing of a subdivision agreement and issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions (NOAC) for the Site Plan Control application prior to adoption of the by-law.

Copies of the Scott Morgan peer review report have been provided to Lowes and Woodbine Live!.

In the event that City Council decides to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code as amended by By-law 862-2007, to permit modified driveway widths, City Council may:

1.            Amend former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code as amended by Site-Specific By-law 862-2007, for the lands formerly known as 315-325 Dalesford Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4. 

2.            Authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

This application is a City-initiated amendment to the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the property formerly known as 315-325 Dalesford Road.  This amendment responds to Community Council’s direction to amend Site Specific By-law 862-2007 to allow for driveway widths of up to eight metres at the curb for driveways leading to two townhouse units.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended by Site Specific By-law 1992-203 for the lands at 19 Chauncey Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9. 

2.            City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

3.            The Bills not be introduced to City Council for enactment, until the applicant has constructed a new acoustical fence along the east property line, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code (Site-Specific By-law 1992-203) from Industrial Class 1 – IC1 (restricted to woodworking use only) to Industrial Class 1 (general)  at 19 Chauncey Avenue.  No changes are proposed to the existing building.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 99 Chandos Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1. 

2.            City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

At the meeting of City Council on June 27, 28 and 29, 2006, the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, was requested to report to Community Council recommending an amendment to the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, once a number of conditions had been satisfied, to permit the conversion of 99 Chandos Avenue, formerly used for industrial purposes, to a residential use containing a building with 15 dwelling units substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law included as Attachment 5 to the Final Report (March 21, 2006) from the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            City Council refuse the application for the demolition of the property at 691 Scarlett Road under Section 34(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

2.            Should the owner appeal the refusal of the application for demolition, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition of the appeal.

3.            City Council amend By-law No. 264-2003 designating the property at 691 Scarlett Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to update the by-law in accordance with Section 30(10) of the Ontario Heritage Act to include a statement explaining the cultural heritage value or interest of the property and a description of its heritage attributes.

4.            Should the owner appeal the amending of the designating by-law, City Council authorize the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.

5.            Should the owner appeal the amending of the by-law, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Conservation Review Board in support of the proposed amendment. 

6.            City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

This report recommends that City Council refuse the application for the demolition of the property at 691 Scarlett Road, which is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  The report further recommends that Council amend the designating By-law No. 264-2003 to update the by-law in accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council that:

1.            City Council refuse the application for the demolition of the property at 691 Scarlett Road under Section 34(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

2.            Should the owner appeal the refusal of the application for demolition, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition of the appeal.

3.            City Council amend By-law No. 264-2003 designating the property at 691 Scarlett Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to update the by-law in accordance with Section 30(10) of the Ontario Heritage Act to include a statement explaining the cultural heritage value or interest of the property and a description of its heritage attributes.

4.            Should the owner appeal the amending of the designating by-law, City Council authorize the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.

5.            Should the owner appeal the amending of the by-law, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Conservation Review Board in support of the proposed amendment. 

6.            City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

7.            City Council request the Chief Building Official/Executive Director, in consultation with Heritage Preservation Services, to investigate for compliance in accordance with Article V of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 629, Property Standards.

May 28, 2010 letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 691 Scarlett Road application to demolish a designated Heritage Property and amendment of Designating By-law, for consideration by the Etobicoke York Community Council at its June 22, 2010 meeting.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 50 Firwood Crescent, together with the Ward Councillor.

2.            Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

3.            Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This application proposes to redevelop the vacant lot at 50 Firwood Crescent with 3 detached dwellings and 8 semi-detached dwellings fronting on Firwood Crescent and 18 freehold townhouse units fronting on a new public cul-de-sac.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 2388-2398 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 13 Superior Avenue together with the Ward Councillor.

2.            Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

3.            Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This application proposes to build a 14-storey mixed use building (including mezzanine above the first floor and an amenity area on the 14th floor) with retail at grade and 150 units above at 2388-2398 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 13 Superior Avenue.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.            City Council direct the appropriate staff to initiate the process for the land exchange/sale of the portions of the Old Mill Drive and Riverview Gardens municipal right-of-ways to implement the proposed road realignments, and initiate the detailed design of the future road alignments.

2.            City Council direct Planning staff to continue processing the zoning amendment application with the proposed realignment of Old Mill Drive and Riverview Gardens.

3.            The proponent be required to prepare and implement, at their expense, appropriate traffic management measures concurrent with the construction of road realignments and the development, and a post development Traffic and Road Safety Audit to address potential traffic infiltration, pedestrian safety, and possible Mossom Road impacts, to the satisfaction of Transportation Services and City Planning.

4.            City Council direct staff to secure appropriate Section 37 community benefits, among other matters as necessary, in an executed agreement prior to the introduction of any Bills to City Council, as outlined in this report.

5.            City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board should the application be appealed by the proponent and the proposed development be modified from the current proposal outlined in this report.

The applicant proposes to develop two parcels of land with a terraced 10-storey residential building at 2500 Bloor Street West, and a 12-storey plus mezzanine level terraced mixed use building at 2490 Bloor Street West (inclusive of 2464 and 2474 Bloor Street West).

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            The alterations to Westhumber Boulevard, as described in Appendix A and as shown on the attached drawings Y10507 003 and Y10507 004.

The purpose of this report is to recommend enacting a highway alteration by-law to construct a parking lay-by on the north side of Westhumber Boulevard, along the frontage of Esther Lorrie Park, and centre medians at the east and west approaches to the intersection of Westhumber Boulevard and Esther Lorrie Drive/Ixworth Road.

All costs associated with the roadway alterations on Westhumber Boulevard, are provided in the approved 2010 Capital Budget.

Transportation Services recommends that City Council approve:

1.            Enacting “No Left Turn Anytime” prohibitions for southbound and westbound traffic at the intersection of Highway 27 and Nearctic Drive.

The purpose of this report is to request approval of southbound and westbound “No Left Turn Anytime” prohibitions at the intersection of Highway 27 and Nearctic Drive. Although there is an existing channelising island at the east approach to the intersection that restricts the approach to in-right /out-right turning movements only, vehicles are observed making illegal southbound left-in and westbound left-out movements. The proposed prohibitions will reinforce the current turning movement restrictions existing at this approach.

Transportation Services recommends that City Council approve:

1.            Designating the most easterly southbound lane on Kipling Avenue, between St. Andrews Boulevard and a point 100 metres north of St. Andrews Boulevard, as a one way traffic lane, anytime, for left turning traffic.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to designate the most easterly southbound lane on Kipling Avenue, between St. Andrews Boulevard to a point 100 metres north of St. Andrews Boulevard, as an exclusive left turn lane.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Installing all-way STOP controls at the intersection of Abilene Drive and Twyford Road.

The purpose of this report is to present the results of an investigation for all-way STOP controls at the intersection of Abilene Drive and Twyford Road. A staff assessment concludes that while the intersection does not comply with the City’s warrant for installing all-way STOP controls, from a road safety perspective the lack of adequate intersection turning sight distance justifies all-way STOP operation.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Rescinding the “No Stopping, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday” regulation on both sides of Cosmo Road, between the meter zone and the south limit of the road.

2.            Enacting a “No Stopping, 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday” regulation on both sides of Cosmo Road, between a point 45.5 metres south of Bloor Street West and the south limit of the road.

The purpose of this report is to receive approval to change the existing “No Stopping, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday” regulation to “No Stopping, 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday” on both sides of Cosmo Road, between the “Pay and Display” zone and the south limit of the road.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Enacting a “No Standing Anytime” regulation on the south side of Bradstock Road, from Rivalda Road to the east limit of the street.

The purpose of this report is to request introducing a “No Standing Anytime” regulation on the south side of Bradstock Road, from Rivalda Road to the east limit of the street.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Rescinding the “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday” regulation on both sides of Knox Avenue between Vanhill Avenue and Muir Avenue.

The purpose of this report is to request removing the “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday” regulation on both sides of Knox Avenue, between Vanhill Avenue and Muir Avenue.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.            Approve enacting a 40 km/h speed limit on Hathor Crescent, between Rowntree Mill Road, east intersection, and Rowntree Mill Road, west intersection, as the requirements of the 40 km/h Speed Limit Warrant are achieved.

2.            Not approve traffic calming on Hathor Crescent.

The purpose of this report is to provide the results of our studies regarding vehicular speed and volume on Hathor Crescent and the need for traffic calming or other mitigating measures for this road.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            The alterations and modifications on Clouston Avenue and Sykes Avenue, as highlighted in Appendix A, and specifically as shown on the attached drawing numbers U-511-001, U-905-001 and U-905-002.

The purpose of this report is to recommend enacting a highway alteration by-law related to the following physical road modifications:

• a new 1.8 metre wide sidewalk on the south side of Clouston Avenue, between Denison Road West and Centre Road
• a widening of the existing sidewalk to 1.8 metres on the north side of Clouston Avenue, between Denison Road West and Centre Road
• a narrowing of the travelled portion of Clouston Avenue, between Denison Road West and Centre Road to 7.5 metres
• a new turning basin at the west limit of Clouston Avenue
• a widening of the existing sidewalk to 1.8 metres on the east and south sides of Sykes Avenue, from Denison Road West to Weston Road
• a narrowing of the travelled portion of Sykes Avenue to 8.5 metres wide from Denison Road West to Weston Road.

All costs associated with the installation of the sidewalk are included in the 2010 Sidewalk Installation/Capital Works budget.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.            That traffic calming not be implemented on Clouston Avenue, between Weston Road and Denison Road West.

The purpose of this report is to outline the findings of an investigation to determine the need to install speed humps as a traffic calming measure on Clouston Avenue. A technical assessment has determined that the criteria for installing speed humps have not been met for Clouston Avenue, between Weston Road and Denison Road West.

Adopting the above-noted recommendation does not result in any financial impact; however, if Community Council decides to approve installing traffic calming devices on this section of Clouston Avenue, the following financial impact will result:

1.            The estimated cost for installing approximately three speed humps will be $9,000.00. This can be accommodated within funds allocated by City Council as part of the Transportation Capital Budget, subject to competing priorities and funding availability.

Transportation Services recommends that City Council approve:

1.            Enacting a 40 km/h speed limit on Coe Hill Drive, between The Queensway and Windermere Avenue.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to reduce the speed limit on Coe Hill Drive.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Rescinding the 40 km/h speed limit on the street listed in Appendix A.

2.            Enacting the 40 km/h speed limits on the streets listed in Appendix B.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to reduce the speed limit on Bralorne Crescent, Hanley Street, Magwood Court, Medland Street, Pasadena Gardens, Skylark Road, and Warren Crescent.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Rescinding the existing “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the north side of Weatherell Street, from a point 23 metres west of Armadale Avenue to a point 27 metres further west.

2.            Rescinding the existing “Maximum 60 Minute Parking” regulation on the north side of Weatherell Street, from Jane Street to Armadale Avenue;

3.            Rescinding the existing “Maximum 60 Minute Parking from 5:00 p.m. of one day to 8:30 a.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday” regulation on the south side of Weatherell Street, from Jane Street to Armadale Avenue;

4.            Enacting a “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the north side of Weatherell Street, between a point 23 metres west of Armadale Avenue and a point 45 metres further west.

5.            Enacting a “No Stopping, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the north side on Weatherell Street, between a point 23 metres west of Armadale Avenue and a point 45 metres further west.

6.            Enacting a “Maximum 60 Minute Parking” regulation on the north side of Weatherell Street, from Jane Street to a point 68 metres west of Armadale Avenue.

7.            Enacting a “Maximum 60 Minute Parking from 5:00 p.m. to 12:00 Midnight, Monday to Friday” regulation on the south side of Weatherell Street, from Jane Street to Armadale Avenue.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to amend the parking and stopping regulations on the north side of Weatherell Street, west of Armadale Avenue, to prohibit vehicles from stopping between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday. This regulation is to supplement the existing No Parking Anytime regulation and also slightly extend the regulation further to the west. These amendments will deal with issues of vehicles blocking driveways when picking up and dropping off students at St. Pius X Catholic School.

Transportation Services recommends that: 

1.            Etobicoke York Community Council approve the installation of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities at the locations identified in the attached Appendix A.

The purpose is to obtain approval for the installation of a number of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities.

Funds in the amount of $900.00 are available within Transportation Services Division’s 2010 Operating Budget.

Transportation Services recommends to Etobicoke York Community Council that:

1.            An all-way STOP control not be installed at the intersection of Freeman Road and Westacres Drive as the warrant requirements have not been met.

The purpose of this report is to present the results of a study regarding the installation of an all-way STOP control at the intersection of Freeman Road and Westacres Drive. A staff assessment concludes that the criteria for installing an all-way STOP at this location are not achieved.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.            Authorise the introduction of on-street parking permits on the south side of Dunraven Drive, between Blackthorn Avenue and the east limit of street, effective between the hours of 12:01 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., seven days a week.

The purpose of this report is to recommend introducing on-street parking permits on the south side of Dunraven Drive, between Blackthorn Avenue and the east limit of the road.

There are no financial implications resulting from adopting this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Rescinding the existing “One Hour Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Daily” regulation on the east side of Ennerdale Road, from Dynevor Road and a point 30 metres south of Eglinton Avenue West.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to allow three-hour parking anytime on the east side of Ennerdale Road, from Dynevor Road and a point 30 metres south of Eglinton Avenue West.

Transportation Services recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council approve:

1.            Implementing and rescinding the parking regulations as outlined in the attached Appendix A.

The Ward Councillor had requested implementing pay-and-display parking on Mackay Avenue in the vicinity of Dufferin Street. A review by Transportation Services and Parking Authority staff concluded that the south side of Mackay Avenue, immediately west of Dufferin Street, can accommodate pay-and-display parking.

Funding for signage and pay-and-display parking machines, respectively, is available in the 2010 Operating Budget for Transportation Services and in the 2010 Operating Budget for the Toronto Parking Authority, in the following accounts:

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that:

1.             Etobicoke York Community Council deny the request for the fence exemption at 101 Silverhill Drive, based on non-compliance with Chapter 447, Toronto Municipal Code, Fences.

This report is in regard to an application for a fence exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 - Fences at 101 Silverhill Drive whereby the property owner is applying to maintain existing as well as erect proposed fencing in the rear and side yards that are and will be, respectively, in violation of the Fence By-law respectively, for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that:

1.            Etobicoke York Community Council deny the request for the fence exemption at 103 Silverhill Drive, based on non-compliance with Chapter 447, Toronto Municipal Code, Fences.

This report is in regard to an application for a fence exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 - Fences at 103 Silverhill Drive whereby the property owner is applying to maintain existing fencing in the rear and side yards that are in violation of the Fence By-law respectively, for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

This report is in regard to direction from Etobicoke York Community Council to report back on the non-conforming status, property standards, waste issues and by-law matters within Municipal Licensing and Standards purview, for the properties municipally known as 32 and 36 Caledonia Road, and 1536 St. Clair Avenue West.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

This report outlines Toronto Water’s findings of New Sabby Concrete and Supplies Inc., located at 32 & 36 Caledonia Road related to storm and sanitary sewer discharges.

There are no financial implications to the City as a result of this report.

To report on the monitoring of the business activities and operation of the Outdoor Café at 3341-3343 Lake Shore Boulevard West and to report on any complaints received since June 2009.

There are no financial implications resulting from receipt of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommend that:

1.            Etobicoke York Community Council refuse the application at 274 Durie Street, as the proposed fence does not comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences.

This report is in response to an application for a fence exemption submitted by Stephen Popovich, Associates Inc., Landscape Architecture, on behalf of the property owner at 274 Durie Street, to request a fence exemption on all fencing materials, including tempered glass and masonry stone work which is associated with the swimming pool enclosure, for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommend that:

1.            Etobicoke York Community Council refuse the application for a fence exemption at 280 Keele Street, as the height of the fence posts does not comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences.

This staff report is in response to an application for a Fence Exemption to maintain an existing close board wooden fence, with the fence posts ranged from a height of 2.1 to 2.4 metres, at the rear yard on the south of the property at 280 Keele Street, for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommend that:

1.            Etobicoke York Community Council refuse the application from the owner at 63 Harvie Avenue, as the constructed fence does not comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences.

This staff report is in response to an application for a fence exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 – Fences, submitted by the owner of 63 Harvie Avenue to maintain an existing close board wooden fence with three sections, adjacent to the deck measuring between 2.60 metres and 2.83 metres high, that is in violation of the Fence By-Law, and for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.            Rename Newport Beach Park located at 2115 Lakeshore Boulevard West to “Jean Augustine Park” in honour of her significant contributions to the City of Toronto.

This report responds to the request made at Etobicoke York Community Council (EY37.38) at its May 25th, 2010 meeting, regarding the renaming of Newport Beach Park located at 2115 Lake Shore Boulevard West in tribute to the Honourable Jean Augustine.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Toronto Fire Services recommends that:

1.            Part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below be designated as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 – Fire Routes – 1020 Martin Grove Road.

2.            City Council authorise the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

There are no financial implications associated with this report.

Toronto Building recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council give approval of this demolition application and subject to the following conditions:

1.            That a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official.

2.            That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition.

3.            That sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5, and 629-10, paragraph B.

4.            That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.

On May 27, 2010, Toronto Building received a demolition permit application to demolish a one storey single family dwelling at 2192 Dufferin Street Toronto Building has not received a building permit application to replace the building to be demolished as of this date.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Toronto Building recommends that Etobicoke York Community Council give consideration to the demolition application and decide to:

1.            Refuse the application to demolish the subject one-storey single family dwelling because there is no permit application to replace the buildings on the site; or,

2.            Approve the application to demolish the subject one-storey single family dwelling without conditions; or

3.            Approve the application to demolish the subject one-storey single family dwelling with the following conditions:

a.            that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;

b.            that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;

c.            that sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5, and 629-10, paragraph B; and

d.            that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.

On May 31, 2010, Toronto Building received a demolition permit application to demolish a two storey single family dwelling at 296 Old Weston Road Toronto Building has not received a building permit application to replace the building to be demolished as of this date.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.