City of Toronto Logo Contents

Considered by City Council on
February 22, 2010
February 23, 2010



Etobicoke York Community Council


Meeting No. 34   Contact Glenda Jagai, Committee Administrator
Meeting Date Tuesday, February 9, 2010
  Phone 416-394-2516
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail etcc@toronto.ca
Location Council Chamber, Etobicoke Civic Centre
  Chair   Councillor Frances Nunziata  

Item  

EY34.5 41 Long Branch Avenue – City Tree Removal (Ward: 6)  

EY34.22 Islington Avenue and Advance Road – Traffic Control Signals (Ward: 5)  

EY34.34 Rogers Road – Parking Regulation Amendments (Ward: 17)  

EY34.41 96 Rivalda Road - Direction to Oppose Committee of Adjustment Application - A317/09EYK (Ward: 7)  



City of Toronto Logo Committee Report

Considered by City Council on
February 22, 2010
February 23, 2010



Etobicoke York Community Council



EY34.5

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

Ward: 6 

41 Long Branch Avenue – City Tree Removal
City Council Decision

City Council on February 22 and 23, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.            City Council deny the request for permission to remove one (1) healthy City-owned tree adjacent to 41 Long Branch Avenue.

————
Committee Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.            City Council deny the request for permission to remove one (1) healthy City-owned tree adjacent to 41 Long Branch Avenue.

Origin
(December 10, 2009) Report from Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Summary

This report requests that Council confirm the decision of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to deny the request for permission to remove a healthy City-owned, red oak tree.

Background Information (Committee)
December 10, 2009 staff report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-26520.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(January 11, 2010) E-mail from Anton Kikas (EY.Main.EY33.9.1)
Speakers (Committee)

(February 9, 2010) Anton Kikas
(February 9, 2010) Peter Kuntz, Consulting Professional Forester
(February 9, 2010) Nick Buczok
(February 9, 2010) Carol Milroy
(February 9, 2010) Marjut Dunker
(February 9, 2010) Ken Tilden


EY34.22

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

Ward: 5 

Islington Avenue and Advance Road – Traffic Control Signals
City Council Decision

City Council on February 22 and 23, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.            City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Islington Avenue and Advance Road.

————
Committee Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.           City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Islington Avenue and Advance Road.

Origin
(October 8, 2009) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District
Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Islington Avenue and Advance Road.

 

The installation of traffic control signals is justified as the Traffic Control Signal Warrant requirements are achieved.  The installation of traffic control signals will provide safe and convenient access for vehicles and pedestrians, and will not compromise the integrity of the arterial road network.

Background Information (Committee)
October 8, 2009 staff report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-26526.pdf)

Attachment
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-26527.pdf)


EY34.34

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

Ward: 17 

Rogers Road – Parking Regulation Amendments
City Council Decision

City Council on February 22 and 23, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.            City Council approve implementing and rescinding the parking regulations on Rogers Road, east of Blackthorn Avenue, as outlined in Appendix A in the report (January 13, 2010) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

————
Committee Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.            City Council approve implementing and rescinding the parking regulations on Rogers Road, east of Blackthorn Avenue, as outlined in Appendix A in the report (January 13, 2010) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

Origin
(January 13, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District
Summary

The purpose of this report is to extend the pay-and-display parking area on the south side of Rogers Road, east of Blackthorn Avenue, by 14 metres to maximize the number of on street parking stalls.  Implementing pay parking in this area will encourage parking turnover, providing short-term parking for patrons of local businesses.

Background Information (Committee)
January 13, 2010 report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-26606.pdf)

Attachments
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-26607.pdf)


EY34.41

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

Ward: 7 

96 Rivalda Road - Direction to Oppose Committee of Adjustment Application - A317/09EYK
City Council Decision

City Council on February 22 and 23, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose Committee of Adjustment Application A317/09EYK with respect to 96 Rivalda Road and to retain such expert witnesses as necessary.

————
Committee Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommended that:

 

1.                            City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose Committee of Adjustment Application A317/09EYK with respect to 96 Rivalda Road and to retain such expert witnesses as necessary.

Origin
(February 9, 2010) Member Motion from Councillor Mammoliti
Summary

The owner of 96 Rivalda Road applied under Application A317/09EYK for variances to By-law 7625 to permit the construction of a second storey addition over the existing industrial building.  The second storey warehouse area is proposed to be used in conjunction with the existing automotive service station.  The requested variances are for:

 

a.        automotive service stations are not listed as a permitted use in an M1 zone; and

 

b.        a total of 37 parking spaces are required for the site, 7 parking spaces are proposed.

 

The Committee of Adjustment approved the application as modified and on conditions.  It granted a variance for one parking space.  Both the public hearing notice and notice of decision are attached to this motion.

 

The owner has appealed its original application to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Committee)
Member Motion
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-27234.pdf)


Submitted Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair, Etobicoke York Community Council