![]() |
Contents |
Considered by City Council on |
Etobicoke York Community Council |
Meeting No. | 39 | Contact | Rosemary MacKenzie, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 |
Phone | 416-394-2516 | |
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
etcc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Council Chamber, Etobicoke Civic Centre
|
Chair | Councillor Frances Nunziata |
Item | ||
EY39.1 | Closing Sections of Indian Line between Eglinton Avenue West and Renforth Drive, and Eglinton Avenue West between Orbitor Drive to West of Spectrum Way (Ward: 3) | |
EY39.2 | 200 Annette Street Alteration to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29, Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement (Ward: 13) | |
EY39.3 | 82 Buttonwood Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications Final Report (Ward: 11) | |
EY39.4 | 2464, 2474, 2490 and 2500 Bloor Street West (1 and 2 Old Mill Drive) Zoning Amendment Application Final Report (Ward: 13) | |
EY39.19 | 3699, 3741-3751 Bloor Street West and 925 Kipling Avenue Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the H Holding Symbol) Final Report (Ward: 5) | |
EY39.20 | 980 Lansdowne Avenue (Phase 4 Lands) Zoning Amendment Application to remove the H Holding Symbol Status Report (Ward: 17) | |
EY39.21 | 2143 and 2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Lifting of the H Applications Supplementary Report (Ward: 6) | |
EY39.29 | Lawrence Avenue West and Westona Street Traffic Control Signals (Ward: 2) | |
EY39.31 | Gunns Road and Richgrove Drive - Highway Alteration By-laws (Ward: 4, 11) | |
EY39.38 | 258-260 Browns Line Payment-In-Lieu of Parking (Ward: 6) | |
EY39.39 | Lake Shore Boulevard West and TTC Streetcar Underpass/Private Driveway Access to 2111 Lake Shore Boulevard West Traffic Control Signals (Ward: 6) | |
EY39.41 | Sheppard Avenue West and Laura Road Traffic Control Signals (Ward: 7) | |
EY39.43 | Runnymede Road and Ryding Avenue/Plaza Driveway (2471/2525 St. Clair Avenue) Westbound Compulsory Turn Regulation (Ward: 11) | |
EY39.44 | Jane Street and Wright Avenue Traffic Control Signals (Ward: 11) | |
EY39.48 | St. Clair Avenue West and Lansdowne Avenue - No Right Turn on Red Regulation (Ward: 17) | |
EY39.52 | Assumption of Roads and Services - Turnberry Green Homes Inc. - Plans of Subdivision 66M-2376 and 66M-2421 - 80-100 Turnberry Avenue (Ward: 17) | |
EY39.54 | Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes (Ward: 12) | |
EY39.60 | Toryork Drive - Parking Regulation Amendment (Ward: 7) | |
EY39.62 | Installation of On-Street Parking Spaces for Persons with Disabilities EYD August 2010 (Ward: 17) | |
EY39.65 | Request from Mimico Train Station Committee for the waiving of fees for water and sewage hook-up (Ward: 6) | |
EY39.69 | 98 Index Road and 150 North Queen Street Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the H Holding Symbol) Final Report (Ward: 5) | |
![]() |
Committee Report |
Considered by City Council on |
Etobicoke York Community Council |
EY39.1 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 3 |
Closing Sections of Indian Line between Eglinton Avenue West and Renforth Drive, and Eglinton Avenue West between Orbitor Drive to West of Spectrum Way |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council permanently close that part of the public highway, Indian Line between Eglinton Avenue West and Renforth Drive, being part of the road allowance between the Townships of Etobicoke and Toronto Gore, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-24324, in the City of Toronto, shown as Part 1 on Sketch PS‑2010-037 (“Highway One”), and enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix “A” to the report (July 14, 2010) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, subject to City Council authorizing the sale of Highway One to The Corporation of the City of Mississauga.
2. City Council permanently close portions of the public highway Eglinton Avenue West, in the City of Mississauga, between Orbitor Drive to west of Spectrum Way, being Part 1 on Plan 43R-13337, Blocks 11,12 and 13 on Plan 43M-793 and Part 3 on Plan 43R-14617 and shown as Part 2 on Sketch PS-2009-080, Part 2 on Sketch PS-2009-081 and Part 2 and Part 4 on Sketch PS-2009-082a (collectively known as “Highway Two”), and enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix “B” to the report (July 14, 2010) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, subject to City Council authorizing the sale of Highway Two to The Corporation of the City of Mississauga. |
———— |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council permanently close that part of the public highway, Indian Line between Eglinton Avenue West and Renforth Drive, being part of the road allowance between the Townships of Etobicoke and Toronto Gore, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-24324, in the City of Toronto, shown as Part 1 on Sketch PS‑2010-037 (“Highway One”), and enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix “A” to the report (July 14, 2010) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, subject to City Council authorizing the sale of Highway One to The Corporation of the City of Mississauga.
2. City Council permanently close portions of the public highway Eglinton Avenue West, in the City of Mississauga, between Orbitor Drive to west of Spectrum Way, being Part 1 on Plan 43R-13337, Blocks 11,12 and 13 on Plan 43M-793 and Part 3 on Plan 43R-14617 and shown as Part 2 on Sketch PS-2009-080, Part 2 on Sketch PS-2009-081 and Part 2 and Part 4 on Sketch PS-2009-082a (collectively known as “Highway Two”), and enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix “B” to the report (July 14, 2010) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, subject to City Council authorizing the sale of Highway Two to The Corporation of the City of Mississauga. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 17, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site. |
Origin |
(July 14, 2010) Report from Acting Director, Transportation Services Division |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request Council’s approval to permanently “stop up and close” Indian Line, south of Matheson Boulevard East, and sections of the Eglinton Avenue West road allowance located on the north side of Eglinton Avenue West, from a point just west of the Etobicoke Creek to Orbitor Drive.
The east section of the City of Mississauga’s bus rapid transit (BRT) facility is proposed in an at-grade alignment on the north side of Eglinton Avenue West, extending from the Etobicoke Creek to Renforth Drive. Sections of property within this proposed alignment are occupied by segments of unimproved road allowance presently owned by the City of Toronto (the City). The City of Mississauga has requested that the City convey certain portions of public highway owned by the City to accommodate the BRT. This will require that the City of Toronto formally close these sections of public highway if they are to be conveyed to the City of Mississauga.
Notice advising the public of the City’s intention to close these sections of road was published according to the requirements of Chapter 162 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code and the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.
The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) was informed of this proposal and does not object to the proposed road closings.
This matter is scheduled as a deputation item. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 14, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32000.pdf) Notice (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32224.pdf) |
EY39.2 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 13 |
200 Annette Street Alteration to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29, Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the property at 200 Annette Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Michael Hatch Designs Ltd. dated July 2010, date stamped and received by the City Planning Division on July 7, 2010 and the Heritage Impact Assessment titled, “200 Annette Street, Toronto, Ontario”, prepared by William N. Greer, Heritage Consultant, dated January 2010, all on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the owner:
a. Prior to Site Plan Approval:
i. providing a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, detailing all restoration, repair and new construction work associated with the project, including a condition assessment of the exterior masonry by a qualified heritage masonry specialist with recommendations for its conservation and an estimate of costs associated with all conservation work, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
ii. entering into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 200 Annette Street with the City;
b. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for 200 Annette Street, including a permit for the demolition, excavation and/or shoring on the subject property:
i. providing a Letter of Credit in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure all conservation work set out in the Conservation Plan;
ii. providing building permit drawings, including plans, elevations, details and specifications to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
iii. providing a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
c. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit:
i. providing a certificate of project completion prepared by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 200 Annette Street (Annette Street Baptist Church) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the proposed designation of the property.
6. City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement. |
———— |
Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the property at 200 Annette Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Michael Hatch Designs Ltd. dated July 2010, date stamped and received by the City Planning Division on July 7, 2010 and the Heritage Impact Assessment titled, “200 Annette Street, Toronto, Ontario”, prepared by William N. Greer, Heritage Consultant, dated January 2010, all on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the owner:
a. Prior to Site Plan Approval:
i. providing a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, detailing all restoration, repair and new construction work associated with the project, including a condition assessment of the exterior masonry by a qualified heritage masonry specialist with recommendations for its conservation and an estimate of costs associated with all conservation work, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
ii. entering into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 200 Annette Street with the City;
b. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for 200 Annette Street, including a permit for the demolition, excavation and/or shoring on the subject property:
i. providing a Letter of Credit in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure all conservation work set out in the Conservation Plan;
ii. providing building permit drawings, including plans, elevations, details and specifications to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
iii. providing a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
c. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit:
i. providing a certificate of project completion prepared by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 200 Annette Street (Annette Street Baptist Church) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board;
5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the proposed designation of the property.
6. City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 17, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990. |
Origin |
(July 8, 2010) Report from Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations to the heritage property at 200 Annette Street, the former Annette Street Baptist Church. This report further recommends the designation of this property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The applicant has applied for Committee of Adjustment and Site Plan approvals to convert the existing place of worship into eight residential condominium units.
This report addresses the application to adaptively reuse the church structure as a residential condominium. The proposed alterations are necessary to accommodate the new use of the building and the project retains the original structure of the church. The majority of the construction would occur within the existing shell and floor plate of the building with the exception of the north elevation where extensive alterations would be made. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 8, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32229.pdf) |
2a | 200 Annette Street Alteration to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29, Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the report (July 8, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting 200 Annette Street – Alteration to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29, Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 29, 2010 transmittal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32546.pdf) |
EY39.3 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 11 |
82 Buttonwood Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications Final Report |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 82 Buttonwood Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 1-83, for the lands at 82 Buttonwood Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. The provision and maintenance of an affordable housing contribution of 15 percent of the new residential units proposed;
ii. Prior to the occupancy of the addition to the hospital in Phase 2 the owner shall agree to provide the “Central Lawn” as "public-accessible, privately-managed" open space subject to the usual City conditions for such public use of private space and at all times subject to closure for hospital use satisfactory to the Chief planner;
iii. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for a residential unit in Phase 3, the owner make the necessary arrangement, including any required amendment to the Section 37 Agreement to secure such matters as may be required as a condition of the H removal from Phase 3, incorporating timing, and any required funds or securities to implement the conclusions of the Community Services and Facilities study for the development (Phases 1 and 3), to the satisfaction of the City;
iv. $25,000 shall be applied towards the relocation and integration of the remnants of the original Coach House into the redevelopment or towards other art features on the site; and
v. As part of the development of Phase 3, the owner shall implement the parking assessment and construction management plan to the satisfaction of the City.
b. The following matters are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. Introduce, at no cost to the municipality, any traffic control signal timing adjustments, including any hardware modifications, required at the Jane Street/Weston Road and Jane Street/Eglinton Avenue West intersections to facilitate forecast traffic to the subject development, which shall be completed to the satisfaction of Transportation Services;
ii. as part of the Site Plan Approval Process, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials labelled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director;
iii. the owner shall in corporate in the construction of the building and there after maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and with respect to such matters as the Chief Planner considers appropriate, the Owner shall; submit a letter from the architect confirming such requirements have been implemented; and
iv. prior to the first Site Plan Approval, the applicant submit a campus master plan (with a detailed phasing plan) and an application for a plan of subdivision, each satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
5. City Council endorse the attached Urban Design Guidelines (Attachment10 to the report dated July 29, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District) that will be used for reviewing the design of public streets, accessible open spaces and individual Site Plan Control applications.
6. City Council authorize Parks, Forestry and Recreation to use the portion of the parkland dedication cash-in-lieu payment above the base 5 percent towards improvements at Pelmo Park and/or Pelmo Community Centre. |
———— |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 82 Buttonwood Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 1-83, for the lands at 82 Buttonwood Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. The provision and maintenance of an affordable housing contribution of 15 percent of the new residential units proposed;
ii. Prior to the occupancy of the addition to the hospital in Phase 2 the owner shall agree to provide the “Central Lawn” as "public-accessible, privately-managed" open space subject to the usual City conditions for such public use of private space and at all times subject to closure for hospital use satisfactory to the Chief planner;
iii. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for a residential unit in Phase 3, the owner make the necessary arrangement, including any required amendment to the Section 37 Agreement to secure such matters as may be required as a condition of the H removal from Phase 3, incorporating timing, and any required funds or securities to implement the conclusions of the Community Services and Facilities study for the development (Phases 1 and 3), to the satisfaction of the City;
iv. $25,000 shall be applied towards the relocation and integration of the remnants of the original Coach House into the redevelopment or towards other art features on the site; and
v. As part of the development of Phase 3, the owner shall implement the parking assessment and construction management plan to the satisfaction of the City.
b. The following matters are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. Introduce, at no cost to the municipality, any traffic control signal timing adjustments, including any hardware modifications, required at the Jane Street/Weston Road and Jane Street/Eglinton Avenue West intersections to facilitate forecast traffic to the subject development, which shall be completed to the satisfaction of Transportation Services;
ii. as part of the Site Plan Approval Process, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials labelled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director;
iii. the owner shall in corporate in the construction of the building and there after maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and with respect to such matters as the Chief Planner considers appropriate, the Owner shall; submit a letter from the architect confirming such requirements have been implemented; and
iv. prior to the first Site Plan Approval, the applicant submit a campus master plan (with a detailed phasing plan) and an application for a plan of subdivision, each satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
5. City Council endorse the attached Urban Design Guidelines (Attachment10 to the report dated July 29, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District) that will be used for reviewing the design of public streets, accessible open spaces and individual Site Plan Control applications.
6. City Council authorize Parks, Forestry and Recreation to use the portion of the parkland dedication cash-in-lieu payment above the base 5 percent towards improvements at Pelmo Park and/or Pelmo Community Centre. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, to report to the next regular meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council on the feasibility of installing traffic signals at Eglinton Avenue West and Emmett Avenue.
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 17, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
These applications propose to permit the comprehensive redevelopment of the 10.96 hectare West Park Health Care Centre site at 82 Buttonwood Avenue. The proposed development is for the expansion of the existing hospital and the addition of new mixed-use, senior-focused residential developments to the east portion of the site. The full build-out of the development will occur in three phases over a projected 20-year timeline. |
Background Information (Committee) |
(July 29, 2010) July 29, 2010 final staff report with revised Attachment 9 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32426.pdf) Attachment 10 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32427.pdf) |
Communications (Committee) |
(August 5, 2010) Letter from E. Parker (EY.New.39.3.1) (August 3, 2010) Fax from Margaret E. Meredith (EY.New.39.3.2) |
Speakers (Committee) |
Anne-Marie Malek, President and CEO, West Park Healthcare Centre |
EY39.4 |
|
Amended |
|
Ward: 13 |
2464, 2474, 2490 and 2500 Bloor Street West (1 and 2 Old Mill Drive) Zoning Amendment Application Final Report |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 1-83 for the lands municipally know as 2464 – 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Drive and 2490 Bloor Street West), substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 483-86, for the lands municipally known as 2500 Bloor Street West (2 Old Mill Drive) substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-laws as may be required.
4. City Council, before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Drive) in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to secure the following facilities, services and matters from the Owner at its expense:
A. An indexed cash contribution of $1,340,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, to be allocated generally as follows:
i. $ 145,000 for Bloor Street Streetscape improvements; ii. $ 145,000 for Jane Street/Baby Point streetscape improvements; iii. $ 250,000 for Traymore Park capital improvements; iv. $ 50,000 for Baby Point Heritage Conservation District study; v. $ 100,000 for Swansea Town Hall Capital Improvements; vi. $ 650,000 for day nursery capital funds in the local area.
Such cash amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the sum by the owner to the City.
B. A public art contribution in accordance with the Toronto Official Plan policies.
C. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale architectural elevation drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials, colours and finishes illustrated and labelled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director (“Approved Exterior Development Details”).
D. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building and there after maintain the Approved Exterior Development Details to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
E. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide a Construction Management Plan at its expense to the satisfaction of the Director, Technical Services.
F. A portion of Old Mill Drive is required to form part of the lot.
a. Prior to site plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act:
i. the owner shall obtain the City’s approval of the closure and disposal of portions of Old Mill Road and of the land exchange of the closed portions of Old Mill Road for the portion of the owner’s lands abutting Riverview Gardens and shall enter into an agreement in respect of this land exchange to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
ii. the owner shall enter into a Municipal Infrastructure Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director Technical Services and General Manager Transportation Services City which agreement shall include a requirement for, among other things, provision for a Construction Management Plan, infrastructure relocation, functional road and intersection design plans, traffic management measures, road realignment and reconstruction and associated financial securities;
iii. the owner shall remediate where necessary the lands on Riverview Gardens needed for the local road realignment to an environmental status that is to the satisfaction of the Director Technical Services, including the completion of a Peer Review by the City at the expense of the owner;
b. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall complete the realignment of Old Mill (including the relocation of services and utilities) to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the approved Municipal Infrastructure Agreement and the Construction Management Plan;
c. Within 18 months from the issuance of the first above grade building permit and prior to the first occupancy of the development, the owner shall complete the realignment of Riverview Gardens to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the approved Municipal Infrastructure Agreement and the Construction Management Plan.
G. The owner shall enter into a site plan agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive director City Planning Division under Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 which agreement shall incorporate plans of the proposed realignment of the local roads.
H. The owner shall complete a post-development Traffic and Road Safety Audit and provide a financial security of $100,000 to the satisfaction of the General Manager Transportation Services to ensure completion of the audit.
I. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Catholic District school Board and the Toronto District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage.
J. The owner shall undertake a technical review of the proposed development and satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Transit Commission (“TTC”).
K. The owner shall agree to provisions regarding environmental sustainability, wind mitigation, municipal services and street tree irrigation.
L. The owner shall enter into and register on title to the lands known municipally in 2009 as 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure the facilities, services and matters set forth in this Appendix 1.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division and the City Solicitor; the agreement to be registered on title to the lands at 2500 Bloor Street West (2 Old Mill Drive) in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor and to secure the following matters from the Owner at its expense:
A. An indexed cash contribution of $760,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, to be allocated generally as follows:
i. $ 105,000 for Bloor Street Streetscape improvements; ii. $ 105,000 for Jane Street/Baby Point streetscape improvements; iii. $ 100,000 for Traymore Park capital improvements; iv. $ 50,000 for Baby Point Heritage Conservation District study; v. $ 350,00 for day nursery capital funds in the local area; vi. $ 50,000 for Swansea Town Hall Capital Improvements.
Such cash amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the sum by the owner to the City.
B. A public art contribution in accordance with the Toronto Official Plan policies.
C. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale architectural elevation drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials, colours and finishes illustrated and labeled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director (“Approved Exterior Development Details”).
D. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building and there after maintain the Approved Exterior Development Details to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
E. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide a Construction Management Plan at its expense to the satisfaction of the Director, Technical Services.
F. Prior to first occupancy of the development the owner shall prepare the City-owned lands being a portion of the parking area at the rear of the lands to an environmental status that is to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks Forestry and Recreation Division, including the completion of a Peer Review by the City at the expense of the owner, and reinstate the said lands to parks standards the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks Forestry and Recreation Division.
G. The owner shall design and construct a publicly-accessible open space, secured for public use through an easement in favour of the City, on a portion of the lot adjacent to Traymore Park, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation in consultation with Executive Director of Technical Services and City Planning. The owner shall be required to post a letter of credit equal to 120% of the value of the design and construction of the publicly-accessible open space.
H. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Catholic District school Board and the Toronto District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage.
I. The owner shall undertake a technical review of the proposed development and satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Transit Commission (“TTC”).
J. The owner shall agree to provisions regarding environmental sustainability, wind mitigation, municipal services and street tree irrigation.
K. The owner shall enter into and register on title to the lot one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure the facilities, services and matters set forth in this Appendix 1.
6. City Council require the proponent to prepare and implement, at their expense, appropriate traffic management measures to address potential traffic infiltration, pedestrian safety and possible impacts on Mossom Road, concurrent with the construction of the road realignments and the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Transportation Services and Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
7. City Council not approve a condition to implement immediately, signage for northbound South Kingsway traffic, a right and left turn lane only, meaning east and westbound movements only.
8. City Council request the Director of Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, to report to Etobicoke York Community Council on implementing additional traffic control measures on Riverview Gardens and on Old Mill Drive, following full occupancy of the development at 2464-2500 Bloor Street West or the realignment of Riverview Gardens with South Kingsway, whichever occurs first, and this review will include the feasibility of prohibiting northbound vehicle traffic between South Kingsway and Riverview Gardens.
9. City Council direct that the developer of 2464-2500 Bloor Street West is responsible for all costs associated with this study and any approved traffic control measures.
10. City Council authorize City officials to take all the necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents to give effect to the above-noted recommendations. |
———— |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 1-83 for the lands municipally know as 2464 – 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Drive and 2490 Bloor Street West), substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, amended to reduce the building height to 10 storeys.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 483-86, for the lands municipally known as 2500 Bloor Street West (2 Old Mill Drive) substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (July 29, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, amended to reduce the building height to 8 storeys.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-laws as may be required.
4. City Council, before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Drive) in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to secure the following facilities, services and matters from the Owner at its expense:
A. An indexed cash contribution of $1,340,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, to be allocated generally as follows:
i. $ 145,000 for Bloor Street Streetscape improvements; ii. $ 145,000 for Jane Street/Baby Point streetscape improvements; iii. $ 250,000 for Traymore Park capital improvements; iv. $ 50,000 for Baby Point Heritage Conservation District study; v. $ 100,000 for Swansea Town Hall Capital Improvements; vi. $ 650,000 for day nursery capital funds in the local area.
Such cash amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the sum by the owner to the City.
B. A public art contribution in accordance with the Toronto Official Plan policies.
C. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale architectural elevation drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials, colours and finishes illustrated and labelled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director (“Approved Exterior Development Details”).
D. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building and there after maintain the Approved Exterior Development Details to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
E. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide a Construction Management Plan at its expense to the satisfaction of the Director, Technical Services.
F. A portion of Old Mill Drive is required to form part of the lot.
a. Prior to site plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act:
i. the owner shall obtain the City’s approval of the closure and disposal of portions of Old Mill Road and of the land exchange of the closed portions of Old Mill Road for the portion of the owner’s lands abutting Riverview Gardens and shall enter into an agreement in respect of this land exchange to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
ii. the owner shall enter into a Municipal Infrastructure Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director Technical Services and General Manager Transportation Services City which agreement shall include a requirement for, among other things, provision for a Construction Management Plan, infrastructure relocation, functional road and intersection design plans, traffic management measures, road realignment and reconstruction and associated financial securities;
iii. the owner shall remediate where necessary the lands on Riverview Gardens needed for the local road realignment to an environmental status that is to the satisfaction of the Director Technical Services, including the completion of a Peer Review by the City at the expense of the owner;
b. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall complete the realignment of Old Mill (including the relocation of services and utilities) to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the approved Municipal Infrastructure Agreement and the Construction Management Plan;
c. Within 18 months from the issuance of the first above grade building permit and prior to the first occupancy of the development, the owner shall complete the realignment of Riverview Gardens to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with the approved Municipal Infrastructure Agreement and the Construction Management Plan.
G. The owner shall enter into a site plan agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive director City Planning Division under Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 which agreement shall incorporate plans of the proposed realignment of the local roads.
H. The owner shall complete a post-development Traffic and Road Safety Audit and provide a financial security of $100,000 to the satisfaction of the General Manager Transportation Services to ensure completion of the audit.
I. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Catholic District school Board and the Toronto District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage.
J. The owner shall undertake a technical review of the proposed development and satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Transit Commission (“TTC”).
K. The owner shall agree to provisions regarding environmental sustainability, wind mitigation, municipal services and street tree irrigation.
L. The owner shall enter into and register on title to the lands known municipally in 2009 as 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure the facilities, services and matters set forth in this Appendix 1.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division and the City Solicitor; the agreement to be registered on title to the lands at 2500 Bloor Street West (2 Old Mill Drive) in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor and to secure the following matters from the Owner at its expense:
A. An indexed cash contribution of $760,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, to be allocated generally as follows:
i. $ 105,000 for Bloor Street Streetscape improvements; ii. $ 105,000 for Jane Street/Baby Point streetscape improvements; iii. $ 100,000 for Traymore Park capital improvements; iv. $ 50,000 For Baby Point Heritage Conservation District study; v. $ 350,00 for day nursery capital funds in the local area; vi. $ 50,000 for Swansea Town Hall Capital Improvements.
Such cash amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the sum by the owner to the City.
B. A public art contribution in accordance with the Toronto Official Plan policies.
C. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale architectural elevation drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials, colours and finishes illustrated and labeled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director (“Approved Exterior Development Details”).
D. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building and there after maintain the Approved Exterior Development Details to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
E. Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide a Construction Management Plan at its expense to the satisfaction of the Director, Technical Services.
F. Prior to first occupancy of the development the owner shall prepare the City-owned lands being a portion of the parking area at the rear of the lands to an environmental status that is to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks Forestry and Recreation Division, including the completion of a Peer Review by the City at the expense of the owner, and reinstate the said lands to parks standards the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks Forestry and Recreation Division.
G. The owner shall design and construct a publicly-accessible open space, secured for public use through an easement in favour of the City, on a portion of the lot adjacent to Traymore Park, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation in consultation with Executive Director of Technical Services and City Planning. The owner shall be required to post a letter of credit equal to 120% of the value of the design and construction of the publicly-accessible open space.
H. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Catholic District school Board and the Toronto District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage.
I. The owner shall undertake a technical review of the proposed development and satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Transit Commission (“TTC”).
J. The owner shall agree to provisions regarding environmental sustainability, wind mitigation, municipal services and street tree irrigation.
K. The owner shall enter into and register on title to the lot one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure the facilities, services and matters set forth in this Appendix 1.
6. City Council require the proponent to prepare and implement, at their expense, appropriate traffic management measures to address potential traffic infiltration, pedestrian safety and possible impacts on Mossom Road, concurrent with the construction of the road realignments and the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Transportation Services and Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
7. City Council direct that all other traffic management proposals related to this application for 2490 and 2500 Bloor Street West be studied by staff and the community before implementation, with costs paid for by the applicant.
8. City Council receive for information, the Request for Direction report (June 3, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
9. City Council authorize City officials to take all the necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents to give effect to the above-noted recommendations. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, to report directly to City Council for its meeting on August 25, 2010, on the following motion:
Moved by Councillor Saundercook:
That the application be approved with the following condition:
- Implement immediately, signage for northbound South Kingsway traffic, a right and left turn lane only, meaning east and westbound movements only.
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 17, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
At its June 22, 2010 meeting, the Etobicoke York Community Council considered a report dated July 3, 2010, from the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District (EY38.9), which made recommendations regarding the realignment of Old Mill Drive and Riverview Gardens and also provided an evaluation of the proposed development of 2464-2500 Bloor Street West associated with the recommendations. Community Council deferred consideration of the report to its August 17, 2010 meeting, and requested that Director of Community Planning, also submit, if feasible, the Final Report on the planning application and provide for a Statutory Public meeting. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 29, 2010 final revised staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33217.pdf) Segment Study (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32412.pdf) |
Background Information (City Council) |
(August 23, 2010) supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services (EY39.4b) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-33308.pdf) |
Communications (Committee) |
(August 10, 2010) E-mail from Cory Philipzyk-Sambrano (EY.New.39.4.1) (August 8, 2010) E-mail from Milos Dukic and Slobadanka Dukic (EY.New.39.4.2) (August 10, 2010) Letter from Marcel Beauregard (EY.New.39.4.3) (August 12, 2010) E-mail from Marcel Beauregard (EY.New.39.4.4) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from Joseph and Margaret Aversa (EY.New.39.4.5) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from Paul, Jill, Mason and Gage Dallas (EY.New.39.4.6) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from Annie Crocetti (EY.New.39.4.7) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from Tadeusz Klos (EY.New.39.4.8) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Dianna Price and John Dobko (EY.New.39.4.9) (August 15, 2010) Letter from residents (EY.New.39.4.10) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Timothy M. Lowman on behalf of Old Mill Residents Association (EY.New.39.4.11) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Charita Holod (EY.New.39.4.12) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Dr. and Mrs. D. J. MacCrimmon (EY.New.39.4.13) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Helena Wojs and family (EY.New.39.4.14) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Dave Rivett, Vicki Giannace and Nicole Rivett (EY.New.39.4.15) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Maria Gallo (EY.New.39.4.16) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Brent and Rosemary Rogers (EY.New.39.4.17) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Darryl Kaplan, on behalf of the Baby Point Gates BIA Steering Committee (EY.New.39.4.18) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Elizabeth Evans and Colin Grant (EY.New.39.4.19) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Rebecca and Marc Enkin and children Adam and Noah (EY.New.39.4.20) (August 15, 2010) Letter from Glenn and Susan Berry (EY.New.39.4.21) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Derek McAllister (EY.New.39.4.22) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Eleanor and Thomas Adamowski (EY.New.39.4.23) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Sandra Boyes and Jim Leatch (EY.New.39.4.24) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Mary DiRenzo and Michael Ritchie (EY.New.39.4.25) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Petar Dukic and Natasa Mikic (EY.New.39.4.26) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Rod and Nancy Skelton (EY.New.39.4.27) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from The Westaway/Samsonenko/Kisil Family (EY.New.39.4.28) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from David Fleming, on behalf of the Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association/Swansea Area Ratepayers' Group (EY.New.39.4.29) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from Carl Stetler (EY.New.39.4.30) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from Esteban J. Parra (EY.New.39.4.31) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from Alice Da Silva (EY.New.39.4.32) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from A. Furman (EY.New.39.4.33) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from Natasha Popovic (EY.New.39.4.34) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from Residents (EY.New.39.4.35) (August 17, 2010) E-mail from Rosemary Rogers (EY.New.39.4.36) (August 17, 2010) Letter from Paul E. Johnston, Johnston Litavski (EY.Main.39.4.37) |
Communications (City Council) |
(August 22, 2010) E-mail from Paul E. Johnston, Johnston Litavski Planning Consultants (CC.Supp.EY39.4.38) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Anne Marie Stetler (CC.Supp.EY39.4.39) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Marianne Yousefi (CC.Supp.EY39.4.40) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Fred Yousefi (CC.Supp.EY39.4.41) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Paul Aiello (CC.Supp.EY39.4.42) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Paul Dallas (CC.Supp.EY39.4.43) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Paul, Jill, Mason and Gage Dallas (CC.Supp.EY39.4.44) (August 21, 2010) E-mail from Ali Leon (CC.Supp.EY39.4.45) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Helena Wojs and family (CC.Supp.EY39.4.46) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Derek McAllister (CC.Supp.EY39.4.47) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Vicki Giannace, Dave Rivett and Nicole Rivett (CC.Supp.EY39.4.48) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Carl Stetler (CC.Supp.EY39.4.49) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from William Potter (CC.Supp.EY39.4.50) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Peter and Heather Fust (CC.Supp.EY39.4.51) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Annie Crocetti (CC.Supp.EY39.4.52) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Tadeusz Klos (CC.Supp.EY39.4.53) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Marcel Beauregard (CC.Supp.EY39.4.54) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Moira Hutchinson (CC.Supp.EY39.4.55) (August 23, 2010) E-mail from Brent and Rosemary Rogers (CC.Supp.EY39.4.56) (August 22, 2010) E-mail from Marcel Beauregard (CC.Supp.EY39.4.57) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Roger Hutchinson (CC.Supp.EY39.4.58) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Timothy Lowman, President, Old Mill Residents Association (CC.Supp.EY39.4.59) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Dianna Price (CC.New.EY39.4.60) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Maria Gallo (CC.New.EY39.4.61) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Stella Derbish (CC.New.EY39.4.62) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Brenna MacCrimmon (CC.New.EY39.4.63) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Margaret Aversa (CC.New.EY39.4.64) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Meghan Aversa (CC.New.EY39.4.65) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Meghan Aversa (CC.New.EY39.4.66) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Joseph Aversa (CC.New.EY39.4.67) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Charita Holod (CC.New.EY39.4.68) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from David N. Gray (CC.New.EY39.4.69) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Pauline and Gloria Baranowsky (CC.New.EY39.4.70) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Dr. and Mrs. D.J. MacCrimmon (CC.New.EY39.4.71) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Dr. and Mrs. D. J. MacCrimmon (CC.New.EY39.4.72) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Trisha Gray (CC.New.EY39.4.73) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Keith McColl and Marilyn McColl (CC.New.EY39.4.74) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Esteban J. Parra (CC.New.EY39.4.75) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Charita Holod (CC.New.EY39.4.76) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Paul Grajauskas (CC.New.EY39.4.77) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Rebecca and Marc Enkin and family (CC.New.EY39.4.78) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Vanessa Conway (CC.New.EY39.4.79) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Paul Lockhard (CC.New.EY39.4.80) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Heather L. MacLean (CC.New.EY39.4.81) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Janet Potter (CC.New.EY39.4.82) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Ann Sutton (CC.New.EY39.4.83) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Peter and Heather Fust (CC.New.EY39.4.84) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Angela Gibson and Stephen McCabe (CC.New.EY39.4.85) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Daniela Catallo (Lockhard) (CC.New.EY39.4.86) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Andrew Furman (CC.New.EY39.4.87) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Daniela Catallo (Lockhard) (CC.New.EY39.4.88) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Sarah Doucette (CC.New.EY39.4.89) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Lisa Syverson (CC.New.EY39.4.90) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Liliana and Elena Stoenescu, Ioan Mihai Oancea and Cristian Turlica (CC.New.EY39.4.91) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Rodney Skelton (CC.New.EY39.4.92) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from John Conway (CC.New.EY39.4.93) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Nancy Birnbaum (CC.New.EY39.4.94) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Rosemary Rogers (CC.New.EY39.4.95) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Marjory Campbell (CC.New.EY39.4.96) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from William M. Vance (CC.New.EY39.4.97) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association/Swansea Area Ratepayers' Group (CC.New.EY39.4.98) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Natasha Popovic (CC.New.EY39.4.99) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Dari Alan Laine (CC.New.EY39.4.100) (August 25, 2010) E-mail from Brenna MacCrimmon (CC.New.EY39.4.101) (August 26, 2010) E-mail from Brenna MacCrimmon (CC.New.EY39.4.102) (August 26, 2010) E-mail from Leszek Dobosz, Lidia Pawlowska-Dobosz and Thomas Dobosz (CC.New.EY39.4.103) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Roger Hutchinson (CC.New.EY39.4.104) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Annie Crocetti (CC.New.EY39.4.105) (August 24, 2010) E-mail from Timothy M. Lowman, President, Old Mill Residents Association (CC.New.EY39.4.106) |
Speakers (Committee) |
M. Beauregard |
4a | 2490 and 2500 Bloor Street West (including 2464 and 2474) - Zoning Amendment Application Request for Direction Report |
Origin |
(June 3, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The applicant proposes to develop two parcels of land with a terraced 10-storey residential building at 2500 Bloor Street West, and a 12-storey plus mezzanine level terraced mixed use building at 2490 Bloor Street West (inclusive of 2464 and 2474 Bloor Street West). |
Background Information (Committee) |
June 3, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-31844.pdf) |
Communications (Committee) |
(June 17, 2010) E-mail from Timothy M. Lowman (EY.Main.39.4a.1) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Janet Potter (EY.Main.39.4a.2) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Dave Buck (EY.Main.39.4a.3) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Peter Kavanagh (EY.Main.39.4a.4) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Rebecca Enkin (EY.Main.39.4a.5) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Vittorio Accomazzi (EY.Main.39.4a.6) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Harold Groothedde (EY.Main.39.4a.7) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Carl Stetler (EY.Main.39.4a.8) (June 18, 2010) E-mail from Susan and Glenn Berry (EY.Main.39.4a.9) (June 19, 2010) E-mail from Pauline Baranowsky (EY.Main.39.4a.10) (June 19, 2010) E-mail from Charita Holod (EY.Main.39.4a.11) (June 19, 2010) E-mail from Joseph and Margaret Aversa (EY.Main.39.4a.12) (June 19, 2010) E-mail from Lynn Der (EY.Main.39.4a.13) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Steve McNally (EY.Main.39.4a.14) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (EY.Main.39.4a.15) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Charles Hall (EY.Main.39.4a.16) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Lynn Riley (EY.Main.39.4a.17) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Ann Tudor (EY.Main.39.4a.18) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Bill Potter (EY.Main.39.4a.19) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Dieter Hartill (EY.Main.39.4a.20) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Maria Gallo (EY.Main.39.4a.21) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Susan Berry (EY.Main.39.4a.22) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Glenn Berry (EY.Main.39.4a.23) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Cory and Michael Philipzyk-Sambrano (EY.Main.39.4a.24) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Charles Hall (EY.Main.39.4a.25) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Peter J. Fust and Heather R. Fust (EY.Main.39.4a.26) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Heather L. MacLean (EY.Main.39.4a.27) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Shilpa Kotecha and Mark Priebe (EY.Main.39.4a.28) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Fred and Marianne Yousefi (EY.Main.39.4a.29) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Esteban J. Parra (EY.Main.39.4a.30) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Charlotte Ann Sutton (EY.Main.39.4a.31) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Tiina and Jaan Timusk (EY.Main.39.4a.32) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Rebecca Enkin (EY.Main.39.4a.33) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Carol-Anne Foty (EY.Main.39.4a.34) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Brent and Rosemary Rogers (EY.Main.39.4a.35) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from John Dent (EY.Main.39.4a.36) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Derek McAllister (EY.Main.39.4a.37) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Stella Derbish (EY.Main.39.4a.38) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Pauline Baranowsky and Gloria Baranowsky (EY.Main.39.4a.39) (June 20, 2010) E-mail from Paul Aiello (EY.Main.39.4a.40) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Jeanne Vlasics-Meuffels (EY.Main.39.4a.41) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Annie Crocetti (EY.Main.39.4a.42) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from David Buck (EY.Main.39.4a.43) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Lee Guthrie (EY.Main.39.4a.44) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Alice Leon (EY.Main.39.4a.45) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Kim Lee (EY.Main.39.4a.46) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Janice Poneta (EY.Main.39.4a.47) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Timothy M. Lowman (EY.Main.39.4a.48) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Cory Philipzyk and Michael Sambrano (EY.Main.39.4a.49) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from A. Furman (EY.Main.39.4a.50) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Karen O'Keeffe (EY.Main.39.4a.51) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Wayne and Barbara Willoughby (EY.Main.39.4a.52) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Cory and Michael Philipzyk-Sambrano (EY.Main.39.4a.53) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from John Foty (EY.Main.39.4a.54) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Brett Coleman (EY.Main.39.4a.55) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Vicki and Dave Rivett (EY.Main.39.4a.56) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Liliana Stoenescu and Ioan Mihai Oancea (EY.Main.39.4a.57) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Ria Westaway (EY.Main.39.4a.58) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Islay McGlynn (EY.Main.39.4a.59) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Daniela Lockhard (EY.Main.39.4a.60) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from Peter Landstreet and Marijke Oudegeest (EY.Main.39.4a.61) (June 22, 2010) E-mail from Karen Goodfellow and David Zayachkowski (EY.Main.39.4a.62) (June 22, 2010) E-mail from Elizabeth Evans and Colin Grant (EY.Main.39.4a.63) (June 22, 2010) E-mail from Paul and Daniela Lockhard (EY.Main.39.4a.64) (June 22, 2010) E-mail from William Vance (EY.Main.39.4a.65) (June 22, 2010) Submission from William Roberts, Swansea Area Ratepayers Group (EY.Main.39.4a.66) (June 22, 2010) E-mail from Mary DiRenzo (EY.Main.39.4a.67) |
EY39.19 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 5 |
3699, 3741-3751 Bloor Street West and 925 Kipling Avenue Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the H Holding Symbol) Final Report |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 1088-2002 for a portion of the lands at 3699 and 3741-3751 Bloor Street West and 925 Kipling Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (July 28, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, the applicant shall enter into a Sale Agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Corporate Officer, the City Solicitor, the Director of Community Planning and the Director of Development Engineering, which Sale Agreement shall reference the applicant's obligation to service the subject lands and which Sale Agreement shall contain a further requirement that a Core Services Agreement be executed prior to closing of the sale transaction. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 1088-2002 for a portion of the lands at 3699 and 3741-3751 Bloor Street West and 925 Kipling Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (July 28, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, the applicant shall enter into a Sale Agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Corporate Officer, the City Solicitor, the Director of Community Planning and the Director of Development Engineering, which Sale Agreement shall reference the applicant's obligation to service the subject lands and which Sale Agreement shall contain a further requirement that a Core Services Agreement be executed prior to closing of the sale transaction. |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
This application proposes to amend the Etobicoke Centre Zoning By-law (1088-2002) to remove the “H” Holding Symbol on a portion of the City-owned property at 3699 and 3741-3751 Bloor Street West and 925 Kipling Avenue (the Westwood Theatre Lands). The “H” Holding Symbol would be removed on land that is proposed to be sold to Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) for the construction of a new Toronto West Courthouse and on adjacent City-retained land that will encompass all related services, including an underground parking garage and related ramps. By-law 1088-2002 provides for the removal of the “H” Holding Symbol upon the delivery of plans and, if required, executed development agreements securing the provision of municipal works required to service the properties. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 28, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32265.pdf) |
19a | 3699, 3741-3751 Bloor Street West and 925 Kipling Avenue Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the H Holding Symbol) Supplementary Report to EY39.19 |
Origin |
(August 12, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
This report informs Community Council about a change in the reporting process for a related report from the Chief Corporate Officer titled “GM33.3 – Sale of Portion of the Westwood Lands”. GM33.3 is a placeholder report for a further report which was to be brought forward with recommendations on the terms of the proposed sale of part of the City-owned Westwood Theatre Lands to the Provincial government for a new Provincial Court House. |
Background Information (Committee) |
August 12, 2010 supplementary staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33124.pdf) |
EY39.20 |
|
Amended |
|
Ward: 17 |
980 Lansdowne Avenue (Phase 4 Lands) Zoning Amendment Application to remove the H Holding Symbol Status Report |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and site specific Zoning By-law No. 728-2006 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment provided as Attachment 3 to the report (August 23, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
The Etobicoke York Community Council submits this matter to City Council without recommendation. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report directly to City Council for consideration at its August 25, 2010 meeting, with a draft zoning by-law amendment if the applicant has entered into a subdivision agreement and satisfied all other requirements listed in Section 12.6 of the Davenport Village Secondary Plan. |
Origin |
(July 26, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
This application proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and site-specific Zoning By-law 728-2006, to remove the "H" Holding symbol for the Phase 4 lands identified in the Davenport Village Secondary Plan and currently zoned “R2(h)”. The proposed development for phase 4 includes a 128- unit stacked townhouse development and the extension of a public park. The phase 4 lands are currently referred to as 980 Lansdowne Avenue. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 26, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32269.pdf) |
Background Information (City Council) |
(August 23, 2010) supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (EY39.20a) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-33309.pdf) |
EY39.21 |
|
Amended |
|
Ward: 6 |
2143 and 2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Lifting of the H Applications Supplementary Report |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the revised Section 37 provisions as set out in Attachment 2 to the report (August 24, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for the lands at 2143 and 2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West.
2. City Council adopt the revised Zoning By-law for 2143-2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (August 24, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the revised Zoning By-law Amendment as may be necessary.
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to bring forward for enactment the Bills with respect to the Official Plan Amendment and the revised Zoning By-law Amendment once the owner has entered into a Section 37 Agreement to secure the community benefits as outlined in the report (August 24, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
5. City Council determine pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act that no further public notice of the proposed changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment is required. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
The Etobicoke York Community Council submits this matter to City Council without recommendation. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report directly to City Council for consideration at its August 25, 2010 meeting, on the final determination of Section 37, parkland dedication, and any minor adjustments made to the draft zoning by-law for 2143-2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West. |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from Director, City Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
At its meeting of November 30, December 1, 2, 4, and 7, 2009, City Council adopted the Final Report recommending approval for a residential/commercial development, and providing for a 5-storey commercial building fronting onto Lake Shore Boulevard West, with below-grade publicly accessible parking at 2143 & 2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West (EY 31.4). The report addressed the need to finalize the Section 37 contributions and cash-in-lieu payments as the parkland dedication appraisal had not been completed at the time of the report. The final report also noted that it had been agreed that a $1,700,000 dollar cap be applied for the combination of Parkland payment and Section 37 contribution. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 28, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32372.pdf) |
Background Information (City Council) |
(August 24, 2010) supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (EY39.21a) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-33310.pdf) |
EY39.29 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 2 |
Lawrence Avenue West and Westona Street Traffic Control Signals |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue West and Westona Street.
2. City Council approve the removal of the pedestrian crossover on Lawrence Avenue West at Westona Street, in conjunction with installing traffic control signals. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue West and Westona Street.
2. City Council approve the removal of the pedestrian crossover on Lawrence Avenue West at Westona Street, in conjunction with installing traffic control signals. |
Origin |
(May 20, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for installing traffic control signals at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue West and Westona Street. |
Background Information (Committee) |
May 20, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32074.pdf) Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32075.pdf) |
EY39.31 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 4, 11 |
Gunns Road and Richgrove Drive - Highway Alteration By-laws |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the alterations and modifications on Gunns Road and Richgrove Drive, as indicated in Appendix “A” to the report (July 19, 2010) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, and generally as shown on the attached sketches. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations and modifications on Gunns Road and Richgrove Drive, as indicated in Appendix “A” to the report (July 19, 2010) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, and generally as shown on the attached sketches. |
Origin |
(July 19, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend the enactment of highway alteration by-laws for the installation of sidewalks and road widening on Gunns Road and Richgrove Drive. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 19,. 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32274.pdf) Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32275.pdf) |
EY39.38 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 6 |
258-260 Browns Line Payment-In-Lieu of Parking |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council exempt the applicant at 258-260 Browns Line from the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code parking requirement of two parking stalls, subject to a $5,000.00 payment-in-lieu of parking.
2. City Council request the applicant to sign a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City of Toronto, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council exempt the applicant at 258-260 Browns Line from the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code parking requirement of two parking stalls, subject to a $5,000.00 payment-in-lieu of parking.
2. City Council request the applicant to sign a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City of Toronto, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
This report seeks Council's approval to exempt the applicant from the parking requirement in the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to provide two additional parking stalls. Instead of accommodating the parking on-site, the applicant has requested a payment-in-lieu of parking in the amount of $5,000.00 to the City of Toronto. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 15, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-31982.pdf) Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-31983.pdf) |
EY39.39 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 6 |
Lake Shore Boulevard West and TTC Streetcar Underpass/Private Driveway Access to 2111 Lake Shore Boulevard West Traffic Control Signals |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West and TTC streetcar underpass/private driveway access to 2111 Lake Shore Boulevard West. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West and TTC streetcar underpass/private driveway access to 2111 Lake Shore Boulevard West. |
Origin |
(July 9, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for installing traffic control signals at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) streetcar underpass/private driveway access to 2111 Lake Shore Boulevard West. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 9, 2010 staff report Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32339.pdf) |
Communications (Committee) |
(August 12, 2010) E-mail from Angelina Chiu (EY.New.39.39.1) (August 12, 2010) E-mail from Peter Lazanik (EY.New.39.39.2) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Robert and Mary Rabjohn (EY.New.39.39.3) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Garry and Brenda Gerber (EY.New.39.39.4) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Antoinette Delisi-Cromwell (EY.New.39.39.5) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Sylvia and John Hamilton (EY.New.39.39.6) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Barbara Fostka (EY.New.39.39.7) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Dr. Robert Cardella and Mrs. Sharon Jazzar (EY.New.39.39.8) (August 15, 2010) E-mail from Judith M. Cocker (EY.New.39.39.9) (August 15, 2010) E-mail from Ellen Rosen Lazanik (EY.New.39.39.10) (August 15, 2010) E-mail from Ian McCausland (EY.New.39.39.11) (August 15, 2010) E-mail from Andrew Cromwell (EY.New.39.39.12) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Ann MacDiarmid (EY.New.39.39.13) (August 16, 2010) Letter from Judi Richter-Jacobs (EY.New.39.39.14) |
EY39.41 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 7 |
Sheppard Avenue West and Laura Road Traffic Control Signals |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Sheppard Avenue West and Laura Road. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Sheppard Avenue West and Laura Road. |
Origin |
(July 19, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of traffic control signals at Sheppard Avenue West and Laura Road. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 19, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32272.pdf) Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32273.pdf) |
EY39.43 |
|
Amended |
|
Ward: 11 |
Runnymede Road and Ryding Avenue/Plaza Driveway (2471/2525 St. Clair Avenue) Westbound Compulsory Turn Regulation |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the enactment of a “Compulsory Turn” regulation during all time periods for eastbound traffic exiting the driveway from 2471/2525 St. Clair Avenue West, located on Runnymede Road opposite Ryding Avenue. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the enactment of a “Compulsory Turn” regulation during all time periods for westbound traffic exiting the driveway from 2174/2525 St. Clair Avenue West, located on Runnymede Road opposite Ryding Avenue. |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to prohibit traffic movements between the driveway to the plaza on the southwest corner of St. Clair Avenue West and Runnymede Road (Wal-Mart/BMO) and Ryding Avenue. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 15, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32080.pdf) Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32081.pdf) |
EY39.44 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 11 |
Jane Street and Wright Avenue Traffic Control Signals |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Jane Street and Wright Avenue/No Frill’s driveway. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Jane Street and Wright Avenue/No Frill’s driveway. |
Origin |
(July 23, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for installing traffic control signals at the Jane Street and Wright Avenue intersection to provide a safer crossing environment for pedestrians crossing lane street, as well as assisting vehicles exiting and entering Wright Avenue. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 23, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32341.pdf) Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32342.pdf) |
EY39.48 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 17 |
St. Clair Avenue West and Lansdowne Avenue - No Right Turn on Red Regulation |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the implementation of a “No Right Turn on Red” regulation at St. Clair Avenue West and Lansdowne Avenue for the northbound approach, during rush hours only. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the implementation of a “No Right Turn on Red” regulation at St. Clair Avenue West and Lansdowne Avenue for the northbound approach, during rush hours only. |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to advise on the need to install a “No Right Turn on Red” regulation at St. Clair Avenue West and Lansdowne Avenue for the northbound approach. |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 15, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32348.pdf) Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32349.pdf) |
EY39.52 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 17 |
Assumption of Roads and Services - Turnberry Green Homes Inc. - Plans of Subdivision 66M-2376 and 66M-2421 - 80-100 Turnberry Avenue |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct that the services installed for Registered Plans 66M-2376 and 66M-2421 be assumed and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plans of Subdivision.
2. City Council authorize and direct the Director, Development Engineering to release the performance guarantees with respect to these development Plans 66M-2376 and 66M-2421.
3. City Council direct that an assumption By-Law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services in Subdivision Plans 66M-2376 and 66M-2421.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-Law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the developer.
5. City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plans of Subdivision 66M-2376 and 66M-2421 to Toronto Hydro. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct that the services installed for Registered Plans 66M-2376 and 66M-2421 be assumed and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plans of Subdivision.
2. City Council authorize and direct the Director, Development Engineering to release the performance guarantees with respect to these development Plans 66M-2376 and 66M-2421.
3. City Council direct that an assumption By-Law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services in Subdivision Plans 66M-2376 and 66M-2421.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-Law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the developer.
5. City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plans of Subdivision 66M-2376 and 66M-2421 to Toronto Hydro. |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from Director, Development Engineering |
Summary |
This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the subdivision development on the site formerly known as 80-100 Turnberry Avenue |
Background Information (Committee) |
July 15, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-31984.pdf) Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-31985.pdf) Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-31986.pdf) |
EY39.54 |
|
Amended |
|
Ward: 12 |
Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
That, for Liquor Licensing Purposes, City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests for:
1. a beer garden to be operated at the 4th Annual Grenada Day Community Festival, to be held at Coronation Park on September 18, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
2. a beer tent and Special Occasion Permit for the 2010 Ontario Australian Rules Football League (OAFL) Grand Final on October 2, 2010, at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that, for Liquor Licensing Purposes, City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following request for:
1. a beer garden to be operated at the 4th Annual Grenada Day Community Festival, to be held at Coronation Park on September 18, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. |
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Etobicoke York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be an event of municipal significance:
1. the 4th Annual Grenada Day Community Festival, to be held at Coronation Park on September 18, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. |
Summary |
Seeking endorsement of various events for liquor licensing purposes. |
Background Information (Committee) |
August 4, 2010 communication from Councillor Frances Nunziata (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-32694.pdf) |
Communications (City Council) |
(August 20, 2010) Fax from Martin Walter, Grand Final Co-ordinator and President, Ontario Australian Rules Football League (CC.Supp.EY39.54.1) |
EY39.60 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 7 |
Toryork Drive - Parking Regulation Amendment |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve rescinding the “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday” prohibition on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 295 metres west of the westerly limit of Weston Road and the southerly limit of Ormont Drive.
2. City Council approve the enactment of a "60 Minute Permitted Parking Anytime" regulation on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between Weston Road and a point 295 metres further west.
3. City Council approve the enactment of a “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday” prohibition on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 295 metres west of Weston Road and a point 330 metres further west.
4. City Council approve the enactment of a “60 Minute, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” parking regulation on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 625 metres west of Weston Road, and a point 140 metres further west.
5. City Council approve the enactment of a “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday” prohibition on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 765 metres west of Weston Road and Ormont Drive. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve rescinding the “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday” prohibition on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 295 metres west of the westerly limit of Weston Road and the southerly limit of Ormont Drive.
2. City Council approve the enactment of a "60 Minute Permitted Parking Anytime" regulation on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between Weston Road and a point 295 metres further west.
3. City Council approve the enactment of a “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday” prohibition on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 295 metres west of Weston Road and a point 330 metres further west.
4. City Council approve the enactment of a “60 Minute, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” parking regulation on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 625 metres west of Weston Road, and a point 140 metres further west.
5. City Council approve the enactment of a “No Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday” prohibition on the north-east side of Toryork Drive, between a point 765 metres west of Weston Road and Ormont Drive. |
Origin |
(August 13, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to introduce a 60 minute parking regulation between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the north-east side of Toryork Drive between 114 Toryork Drive and 100 Toryork Drive.
This proposed parking regulation amendment will address the short duration parking needs of the adjacent properties.
Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Toryork Drive, City Council approval of this report is required. |
Background Information (Committee) |
August 13, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33151.pdf) Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33152.pdf) |
EY39.62 |
|
Amended |
|
Ward: 17 |
Installation of On-Street Parking Spaces for Persons with Disabilities EYD August 2010 |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities at the location identified in Appendix A to the report (August 13, 2010) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, with Appendix A amended by deleting from the entry respecting the parking space on Davenport Road the word "south", and replacing it with the word "east", so that the entry now reads as follows:
On-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities to be installed:
Davenport Road, south side, between a point 115.0 metres east of Osler Street and a point 5.5 metres further east. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities at the location identified in Appendix A to the report (August 13, 2010) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District. |
Origin |
(August 13, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for installing an on-street parking space for persons with disabilities on Davenport Road.
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Davenport Road, City Council approval of this report is required. |
Background Information (Committee) |
August 13, 2010 staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33158.pdf) |
EY39.65 |
|
Adopted |
|
Ward: 6 |
Request from Mimico Train Station Committee for the waiving of fees for water and sewage hook-up |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council waive the fees for the water and sewage hook-up for the Mimico Train Station. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council waive the fees for the water and sewage hook-up for the Mimico Train Station. |
Origin |
(August 17, 2010) Report from Councillor Mark Grimes |
Summary |
A request has been received from a Mimico Train Station Committee to allow the water and sewage hook up of the historical building currently owned by the City of Toronto but under restoration by a local organization the Mimico Train Station Committee.
The Historic Train Station is being restored for the community, and is located in Coronation Park West in Ward 6.
The Committee has been advised that they must pay for the cost of the water and sewage hook up to City of Toronto systems.
As the building is owned by the City of Toronto and will be available for community use , the committee is requesting that the fees be waived, or absorbed by the City of Toronto. |
Background Information (Committee) |
(August 17, 2010) Communication from Councillor Mark Grimes (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33180.pdf) |
EY39.69 |
|
Adopted on Consent |
|
Ward: 5 |
98 Index Road and 150 North Queen Street Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the H Holding Symbol) Final Report |
City Council Decision |
City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code as amended by Site-Specific By-law 129-2009 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 98 Index Road and 150 North Queen Street, as described in the report (August 17, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
———— |
Committee Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code as amended by Site-Specific By-law 129-2009 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 98 Index Road and 150 North Queen Street, as described in the report (August 17, 2010) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
Origin |
(August 17, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
Summary |
This zoning amendment application proposes to remove the “H” Holding Symbol from the lands municipally known as 98 Index Road and 150 North Queen Street to permit a retail development at 98 Index Road and 150 North Queen Street in accordance with Zoning By-law 129-2009. |
Background Information (Committee) |
Staff report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-33184.pdf) |
Submitted Tuesday, August 17, 2010 Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair, Etobicoke York Community Council |