Minutes |
|
Planning and Growth Management Committee |
Meeting No. | 34 | Contact | Merle MacDonald, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Wednesday, January 6, 2010 |
Phone | 416-392-7340 | |
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
pgmc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Committee Room 1, City Hall
|
Chair | Councillor Norman Kelly |
PG34.1 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 27 and Chapter 694 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Arising From City Council’s Amendments Respecting Appeals of Decisions by the Sign Variance Committee |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the draft by-law attached as Appendix A to the November 27, 2009 report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to:
A. amend the proposed Chapter 694 to make all decisions of the Sign Variance Committee final and binding with the exception of decisions of the Sign Variance Committee to grant a variance to Chapter 694, which is only final and binding 21 days after its issuance, unless the decision is referred by the Ward Councillor to City Council for final decision in accordance with the mechanism for referral contained in Article V – Variances and By-law Amendments of the proposed Chapter 694; and
B. add a new subsection to Article V – Variances and By-law Amendments of the proposed Chapter 694, to create a mechanism for the Ward Councillor to require a decision of the Sign Variance Committee to grant a variance to Chapter 694 to be referred to City Council for final decision; such mechanism to include the following:
i. referrals shall be initiated only by the Ward Councillor for the Ward where the sign is proposed to be erected, displayed, modified or restored;
ii. the Ward Councillor shall provide the requisite notice to the Chief Building Official, in writing, within 20 days of the decision of the Sign Variance Committee;
iii. the Community Council for the Ward in which the sign is proposed to be erected, displayed, modified or restored shall hear the Ward Councillor appeal and make recommendations to City Council with respect to granting a variance to the proposed Chapter 694; and
iv. City Council will be the final decision making authority with respect to granting variances to the proposed Chapter 694 referred to City Council at the request of the Ward Councillor.
2. City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures, by adding a new Section 11 to Appendix B – Committees, IV Duties of Community Council to add to the list of Community Council responsibilities and make it the responsibility of the Community Councils to hear the Ward Councillor appeal and make recommendations to City Council with respect to final decisions concerning variances to Chapter 694.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendation subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft bills as may be required.
|
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a public meeting on January 6, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
Origin |
(December 29, 2009) Report from Deputy City Manager, Cluster B |
Summary |
At its meeting of November 30, December 1, 2, 4 and 7, 2009, Toronto City Council requested that the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on possible amendments to the proposed Chapter 694, Signs, General and to Chapter 27, Council Procedures, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, which would implement a mechanism to permit decisions of the Sign Variance Committee granting variances to the proposed Chapter 694 to be appealed to City Council for final decision.
The proposed appeal mechanism may only be triggered by the affected Ward Councillor following a decision of the Sign Variance Committee to grant a variance to the proposed Chapter 694. The relevant Community Council would hear and make recommendations to City Council for final decision concerning granting a variance to Chapter 694.
|
Background Information |
Appeals of Decisions by the Sign Variance Committee (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26144.pdf) Appeals of Decisions by the Sign Variance Committee (Notice of pending report) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26004.pdf) |
Speakers |
Rami Tabello, IllegalSigns |
Motions |
Motion to Adopt Item moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Carried) |
PG34.2 | ACTION |
Deferred |
|
Ward: All |
Approach for Proposed Zoning Regulations for Rooming Houses |
Committee Decision |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee:
1. deferred the item to the next term of Council to allow open dialogue and consultation between elected representatives and affected communities regarding the proposed legalization of rooming houses in neighbourhoods where they are not currently allowed; and
2. requested that the item be brought back to the Committee by the Chair, following consultation with interested Members of Council, no later than November 2011. |
Origin |
(December 14, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
A Staff Report to Planning and Growth Management Committee on January 8, 2009 concluded that consideration of extending zoning and licensing regulations of rooming houses should await the release of two documents: the new draft zoning by-law and the ten year affordable housing framework. Both documents were released in 2009.
This Report recommends an approach for rooming house zoning regulations predicated on an associated licensing regime. Incorporation of any new rooming house zoning regulations in the new draft zoning by-law should be contingent on the development of new rooming house licensing regulations and enforcement strategy.
The zoning approach outlined in this report includes a new definition of a rooming house and several qualifications to ensure consistent minimum standard of design. It is proposed to permit rooming houses in most Residential Multiple (RM) zones, all Residential Apartment (RA) zones, all Commercial Residential (CR) zones and all Commercial Residential Employment (CRE) zones across the City in the new draft zoning by-law. This results in an extension of the areas in which rooming houses are permitted. The existing rooming house provisions found in the R2, R3, R4 and R4A zones of the former City of Toronto zoning by-law will also be retained in the new zoning by-law.
It is recommended that the changes to the zoning and licensing by-laws be implemented concurrently. Changes to the rooming house licensing provisions in the Municipal Code are required to provide consistency between rooming house licensing and zoning regulations to ensure that all of the City's standards are in place across the City. This Report recommends that the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards prepare a licensing strategy that is consistent with the proposed zoning by-law changes. It is further recommended that consultation occur around the changes to the zoning and licensing by-laws prior to submitting a final report back to Committee. |
Background Information |
Approach for Proposed Zoning Regulations for Rooming Houses (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26014.pdf) |
Communications |
(December 27, 2009) E-mail from Ben Daube, Sherwood Park Residents' Association (PG.New.PG34.2.1) (January 4, 2010) E-mail from Phil Nazar, Rooming House Working Group (PG.New.PG34.2.2) (January 4, 2010) E-mail from Simon M. Burke, Village at York Residents Association Incorporated (PG.New.PG34.2.3) (January 4, 2010) E-mail from Pablo Escobar, First Step to Home at WoodGreen Community Services (PG.New.PG34.2.4) (January 5, 2010) E-mail from John Deacon, Toronto Christian Resource Centre (PG.New.PG34.2.5) (January 6, 2010) Submission from Margaret Vandenbroucke, MultiFaith Alliance to End Homelessness (PG.New.PG34.2.6) (January 6, 2010) Submission from Kenneth Hale, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (PG.New.PG34.2.7) (January 6, 2010) Submission from Bart Poesiat, Rupert Community Residential Services of Toronto Inc. (PG.New.PG34.2.8) |
Speakers |
Regi David, West Scarborough Community Legal Services |
Motions |
2 - Motion to Defer Item moved by Councillor John Filion (Carried) That:
1. the item be deferred to the next term of Council to allow open dialogue and consultation between elected representatives and affected communities regarding the proposed legalization of rooming houses in neighbourhoods where they are not currently allowed; and
2. the item be brought back to the Committee by the Chair, following consultation with interested Members of Council, no later than November 2011. 1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Norman Kelly (Redundant) That Recommendation 4 of the report be amended by adding the words “as early as possible in 2011”, so that the recommendation now reads as follows:
4. The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee, as early as possible in 2011, following the preparation of and consultation on the draft zoning by-law and licensing by-law changes.
3 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Redundant) That: Recommendation 1 be amended to read as follows:
1. The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, prepare zoning regulations for Rooming Houses that would be incorporated in the New Zoning By-law that would define and permit Rooming Houses in all R zones. 4 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Redundant) That Recommendation 2 be referred to the Executive Committee for consideration. 5 - Motion to Amend Item (Additional) moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Redundant) That the City Solicitor report on whether the proposed Zoning By-law is in keeping with the Ontario Human Rights Code. |
2a | Proposed Zoning Regulations for Rooming Houses |
Origin |
(January 4, 2010) Letter from Councillor Anthony Perruzza, York West, Ward 8 |
Summary |
Request from Councillor Anthony Perruzza to the Committee. |
Background Information |
Letter from Councillor Anthony Perruzza (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26225.pdf) |
PG34.3 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Update on the Conversion of Rental Housing to Co-ownership |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. In order to more effectively administer the provisions of Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, City Council request the Ministers of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Government Services and Finance and the Chief Executive Officer of the Financial Services Commission, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to amend application forms and web site information to make reference and appropriate links to City of Toronto information on the establishment of co‑ownerships and equity co‑operatives (with share capital) involving the conversion of rental properties.
2. City Council direct City Planning staff to:
a. continue to liaise with Provincial staff in the relevant application intake offices of the Ministry of Government Services and Financial Services Commission to explore alternative methods of advising potential registrants of corporations involving the conversion of rental property in the City of Toronto of the requirements under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act; and
b. update public information on the requirements of Section 111 as it pertains to the conversion of rental housing to co-ownership, and disseminate such information to the Ministry of Government Services and Financial Services Commission, and to other key stakeholders to reiterate and reinforce the City’s requirements in this regard. |
Origin |
(December 7, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
At present, corporations functioning as co-ownerships, including equity co-operatives, are established through a provincial incorporation and registration process. However, the formation of some of these corporate entities involves the conversion of rental housing which is contrary to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act and subject to prosecution under that legislation.
Based on the recommendation of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, City Council at its meeting on October 29 and 30, 2008, directed City staff to meet with provincial staff to develop a protocol to resolve concerns related to the creation of co-ownerships through the conversion of rental housing.
Efforts have been made by the Mayor’s office and City staff to meet with Provincial staff and seek changes to relevant legislation and administrative review processes. To date, these efforts have met with limited success. This report describes the work undertaken to resolve the issue and presents several recommendations for further action.
This report has been prepared in consultation with staff from the Legal Services Division. |
Background Information |
Update on the Conversion of Rental Housing to Co-ownership - Staff Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-25854.pdf) |
Motions |
Motion to Adopt Item moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Carried) |
PG34.4 | Information |
Received |
|
Ward: All |
Consistency of the Official Plan and the Toronto Housing Charter |
Committee Decision |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee received the item for information. |
Origin |
(December 8, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
At its meeting of September 16, 2009, the Planning and Growth Management Committee considered a motion from Councillor Di Giorgio concerning possible amendments to the Official Plan intended to facilitate Toronto Housing Charter opportunities for all residents of the City. Specifically, the motion addressed allowing the conversion of existing affordable rental units to provide affordable homeownership in various parts of the City, and stems from a recent Court decision pertaining to an OMB hearing on 1465 Lawrence Avenue West.
The Committee requested that the Chief Planner, in consultation with Legal staff, report on the matter. Affordable Housing Office staff has also been consulted during the preparation of this report. Planning and Legal staff consider that the Official Plan housing policies are in conformity and consistent with the broader provincial policy framework including the Provincial Policy Statement. As well, these policies are consistent with the intent of the Toronto Housing Charter. No amendments to the Official Plan are necessary or desirable to facilitate the implementation of the Toronto Housing Charter. |
Background Information |
Consistency of the Official Plan and the Toronto Housing Charter - Staff Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-25832.pdf) |
Motions |
Motion to Receive Item moved by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio (Carried) That the item be received for information.
|
PG34.5 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 1, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 41, 42 |
Authorization to Extend the Commercial Façade Improvement Program |
Committee Decision |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee:
1. Approved the preparation of a Community Improvement Plan to extend the Commercial Façade Improvement Program to 20 new Business Improvement Areas.
2. Directed that Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given in accordance with the regulations under the Planning Act with the public meeting targeted for Spring 2010.
3. Directed that the report be forwarded to the Economic Development Committee for information.
4. Authorized and directed the appropriate City officials to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. |
Origin |
(December 7, 2009) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
Summary |
This report seeks authority to prepare a by-law to adopt a Community Improvement Plan (CIP) to extend the Commercial Façade Improvement Program grants to property owners within new Business Improvement Areas once the Business Improvement Area (BIA) becomes eligible and other eligibility requirements have been met. |
Background Information |
Authorization to Extend the Commercial Facade Improvement Program - Staff Report and Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-25831.pdf) |
Motions |
Motion to Adopt Item moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Carried) |
PG34.6 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Amendment to By-law Appointing Building Inspectors |
Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority for the introduction of a Bill revising the list of appointed Inspectors under the Building Code Act, 1992. |
Origin |
(December 16, 2009) Report from Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building |
Summary |
This report requests Council’s authority to have appropriate city staff prepare a Bill to amend By-law 131-2004 which appoints inspectors required for the enforcement of the Building Code Act in the City of Toronto. The amendment will revise the list of individuals appointed under this by-law. |
Background Information |
Amendment to By-law Appointing Building Inspectors (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26006.pdf) List of Names to be added or deleted from Schedule A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26052.pdf) |
Motions |
Motion to Adopt Item moved by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio (Carried) |
PG34.7 | ACTION |
Received |
|
|
2008 Travel Time Study Results and Future Study Participation |
Committee Decision |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee received the item for information. |
Origin |
(October 23, 2009) Letter from Regional Clerk, The Regional Municipality of York |
Summary |
York Regional Council, at its meeting held on Thursday, October 22, 2009, adopted the recommendations of the Transportation Services Committee regarding the report entitled "2008 Travel Time Study Results and Future Study Participation" and forwarded a copy to the City of Toronto for information. |
Background Information |
Letter from Regional Clerk, The Regional Municipality of York (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-26266.pdf) |
Motions |
Motion to Receive Item moved by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio (Carried) That the item be received for information.
|
Procedural Motions |
Motion to Adopt Minutes moved by Councillor Michael Thompson (Carried) |
Wednesday, January 6, 2010 Councillor Norman Kelly, Chair, Planning and Growth Management Committee |
Meeting Sessions |
Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
2010-01-06 | Morning | 9:44 AM | 12:30 PM | Public |
2010-01-06 | Afternoon | 1:40 PM | 2:55 PM | Public |
Attendance | ||
Members were present for some or all of the time period indicated. |
Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
2010-01-06 9:44 AM - 12:30 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Di Giorgio, Filion, Kelly (Chair), Milczyn, Thompson, Vaughan Also present (non-members): Del Grande, Lee, McConnell, Perks |
2010-01-06 1:40 PM - 2:55 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Di Giorgio, Filion, Kelly (Chair), Milczyn, Thompson, Vaughan Also present (non-members): Del Grande, Lee, McConnell, Perks |