To obtain four separate variances to Chapter 694, Signs, General, required to allow ID Inc. to make an application for a sign permit to allow for the erection and display, along the westerly face of the existing building on the premises with the legal description of Concession 2 From the Bay, Part Lot 21 RP63R2379 PART 1, and known municipally as 1 St. Clair Avenue West, of one third party wall sign, which:

• Is not illuminated;
• Is erected within 100.0 metres of other lawful third party signs;
• Is not erected within 30.0 metres of the intersection of a major street with another street;
• Is not erected within 30.0 metres of any premises located, in whole or in part, in an R, RA, or OS sign district;
• Is the only third party wall sign erected on the premises; and
• Is at a height of 30.0 metres, and contains only one sign face, said sign face being 4.57 metres wide by 9.14 metres high for a sign face area of 41.77 square metres, and displaying static sign copy.

The Sign Variance Committee noted that as stated in the letter (November 26, 2010) from Cassels Brock and Blackwell LLP, the Applicant has agreed to reposition the sign so that no variances are required. Accordingly, the Committee decided to take no further action in this matter.

To appeal the decision of the Chief Building Official refusing the variances requested in the first party sign variance application to obtain variances to Chapter 694, Signs, General, required to allow A-Tec Signs to make an application for a sign permit to erect and display one ground sign, 2.78 metres in length by 1.32 metres in height, along the westerly frontage of the premises, displaying “Kinross”.

Sign Variance Appeal Application form submitted by Cassels Brock & Blackwell, LLP,. regarding the decision of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

To enact a by-law to amend the Rules of Procedure for the Sign Variance Committee, concerning adjourning hearings.