Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

Special Assistance for Members of the Public:  City staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call 416-392-7033, TTY 416-338-0889 or

e-mail: teycc@toronto.ca.

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If the Toronto and East York Community Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the committee must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Committee has to meet privately.(City of Toronto Act, 2006)

Notice to people writing or making presentations to the Toronto and East York Community Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

The City videotapes committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be videotaping you and City staff may make the video tapes available to the public.

If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or by calling 416-392-7033.

Schedule of Timed Items

10:00 a.m.:       Items TE33.1 to TE33.8

11:30 a.m.:       Items TE33.10 to TE33.16

1:30 p.m.:         Items TE33.17 to TE33.24

Declaration of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Confirmation of Minutes – March 9, 2010

Speakers/Presentations – A complete list will be distributed at the meeting

Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Bill to Confirm the Proceedings of Community Council will be last items.

The City Solicitor recommends that:

1.         City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close as a public highway the portion of Lower Sherbourne Street, described as follows:

                        Part of PIN 21384-0078 (LT)

Being Part of Sherbourne St Plan 666E  Toronto (AKA Lower Sherbourne Street) Between Lakeshore Blvd and Queens Quay, Toronto, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-24744, City of Toronto Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office (No. 66).

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for 314 Roncesvalles Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report dated March 30, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The applicant proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a music school within the existing building located at 314 Roncesvalles Avenue.

The proposed land use is consistent with the Neighbourhoods policies within the Toronto Official Plan. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for 192A, 194 and 200 Bloor Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report dated March 30, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:

a.         $515,000 to be used for improvements of the Jean Sibelius Square Park for landscaping, restoration work and future upgrading of park facilities.  Such payment would be due prior to the introduction of Bills in Council; and

b.         $185,000 to Jean Sibelius Square Park for additional park improvements, $200,000 for the Annex Heritage Conservation District Study, $100,000 for Ward 20 capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) affordable housing, and $30,000 for the Heritage Plaque Programme in the Annex prior to the first above-grade permit.  These latter payments shall be indexed from the date of execution of the agreement to the date of payment in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto.  Such funds are over and above any requirements for park levies under s.42 of the Planning Act.

The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:

c.         That the owner incorporate, in the construction of the building exterior material shown on the 1:50 scale drawings, recommended for approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, to be submitted for the development of the four elevations.

d.         That the owner submit a wind tunnel analysis to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director and provision of any required mitigation measures contained therein to the to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director prior to the issuance of site plan approval.

e.         That the owner agree that if vehicular access in the future is provided over or through such lands abutting to the north and otherwise in proximity to the site, which may include but not limited to properties at 9 Bedford Road, 5 Prince Arthur Avenue, 194R, and 208R Bloor Street West, the owner shall take all reasonable and appropriate action measures to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and General Manager, Transportation Services, to redirect traffic over such access and to cease all vehicular use of the north-south private right-of-way immediately abutting the site.

f.          That the owner agree to have notice contained of the requirement of recommendation e. in any condominium documents to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

g.         That the owner agree to design, construct and convey to the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and the Executive Director of Technical Services, an at-grade pedestrian walkway over the existing north-south private laneway located along the westerly portion of the subject property, as more particularly detailed on the site plan drawings submitted with this application upon:

i.          the access rights to the existing east-west laneway located to the rear of the property being secured by the City;

ii.         the rear laneway being gated with card reader access at the rear of 220 Bloor Street at the expense of the future laneway users;

iii.        the City owned laneway being upgraded at the City’s expense;

iv.        the release of the easement interests over the existing north-south private laneway located along the westerly portion of the subject property from all affected owners, at the expense of the owner of 192A,194 and 200 Bloor Street West.

h.         That the owner complete the construction and conveyance of the at-grade pedestrian walkway in g. above, within six (6) months (allowing for poor winter weather) after substantial completion of the building, and subject to i. to iv. above being completed within six (6) months.

i.          That the owner agrees that warning clauses shall be inserted in all offers to purchase, agreements of purchase and sale or agreements to lease, and condominium declaration document(s) for each affected residential unit, such warning clauses, respecting the possibility of future area developments, to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning and the City Solicitor.

4.         City Council require the owner to provide and maintain an irrigation system for the proposed trees within the public road allowances, including an automatic timer designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and construct with backflow preventer to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

5.         City Council require that the owner provide any necessary improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing review, if it is determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the site servicing review accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services.

6.         City Council require that, prior to the enactment of Bills, Planning is to receive written confirmation from the Executive Director of Technical Services that the drive aisle widths on levels P2 to P8 have been revised to a minimum of 6 metres as required by the Zoning By-law to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services.

7.         City Council require the owner to agree to any other Section 37 conditions appended to the Draft By-law.

This application was submitted on March 18, 2009, and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes the construction of a 32-storey condominium tower on an eight-storey podium.  It will replace three small commercial buildings at 192A, 194 and 200 Bloor Street West.   The proposed building consists of 183 residential units and two floors of retail space.  The rear portion of the podium contains eight levels of fully enclosed above-grade parking, containing 176 parking spaces.  Parking access will be provided in the short term by way of a laneway from Bloor Street West.

The City Planning Division is recommending approval of the proposed development based on it being substantially in compliance with the development criteria for Mixed Use Areas, Public Realm, Built Form and all other Official Plan policies, the Bloor Corridor Visioning Study and urban design guidelines.

There will be no financial impact as the result of this report.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for 181, 199, 203 Richmond Street West and 10 Nelson Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to be available at or before the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting on April 27, 2010.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to execute an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to secure the following facilities, services and matters:

a.         An indexed cash contribution of $1,000,000.00 prior to the first above-grade building permit for Phase 2 of the project, of which 10% will be allocated to affordable housing in Ward 20, and the remainder for the provision of one or more of the following:

-           design development supporting the John Street streetscape project;

-           design development supporting streetscape improvements to Richmond Street West;

-            streetscape improvements to John Street, Nelson Street and/or Richmond Street West; and

-           Heritage Conservation District Studies in the King Spadina East Precinct.

b.         The provision of a minimum of 743 sq. m. space in Phase 1, accessed from the Richmond Street frontage adjacent to the property at 205 Richmond Street West, for use as a gallery space by the Ontario College of Art and Design (OCAD).

c.         Access in favour of OCAD to loading at 205 Richmond Street West.

d.         A contribution of not less than one percent of the estimated gross construction costs for Phase I of the project towards upgrades to the OCAD space, prior to obtaining any above-grade building permits.

e.         A public art contribution in accordance with the Percent for Public Art Program for a value not less than one percent of the gross construction cost for Phase 2 of the project prior to any above-grade building permit.

The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:

f.          Architectural plans, elevations and landscaping including 1:50 scale elevations, will be secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the owner will be required to submit, in conjunction with each Site Plan Application, 1:50 scale drawings in conformity with this requirement for the five-storey podium.

g.         The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the buildings and thereafter maintain exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

h.         The owner shall provide a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the residential units in the building having at least three bedrooms, or be convertible to three or more bedrooms.

i.          The owner shall be encouraged to build in conformity with the Green Development Standard Checklist on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, date-stamped as received April 8, 2009.

j.          The owner shall provide and maintain an irrigation system, at the applicant's expense, for proposed trees within the public road allowances, including an automatic timer, designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and constructed with a back flow preventer to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services Division, and requirements to maintain in good order and operation.

k.         The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support the development.

l.          The owner shall provide, maintain and operate transportation demand measures, facilities and strategies as stipulated in the applicant's Traffic Impact Study accepted by the General Manager, Transportation Services.

4.         City Council require, prior to the enactment of Bills, written confirmation to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division from the Executive Director of Technical Services that all outstanding issues with respect to the applicant's Traffic Impact Study and Functional Servicing Study have been addressed to his satisfaction.

This application was made on April 23, 2008 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes a mixed use building containing approximately 742 residential units at 181, 199, 203 Richmond Street West and 10 Nelson Street.  The proposal consists of two towers of 41 storeys (west tower) and 31 storeys (east tower) atop a podium ranging from 5 storeys on Nelson Street to 8 storeys on Richmond Street West.  The proposal includes proposed gallery space for the Ontario College of Art and Design (OCAD), on Richmond Street West.

The proposal replaces a surface parking lot with retail, a residential condominium and space for OCAD uses. It is consistent with the King Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study in that it is located within an area that can accommodate tall buildings without destabilizing the warehouse built form or heritage character of the area. The proposal meets many of the goals of the King Spadina Secondary Plan.  It generally meets the intent of the 2004 and 2006 King Spadina Urban Design Guidelines and the City’s Tall Building Guidelines (Design Criteria for Review of Tall Building Proposals).

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for 79 Dunfield Avenue and 85-117 Eglinton Avenue East, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report dated March 31, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:

a.         $150,000.00 to be used for the purchase of new facilities and equipment and the renovation of parts of the existing space for the Central Eglinton Community Centre at 160 Eglinton Avenue East.  Such payment would be due no later than the introduction of the bills in Council; and

b.         contribute $600,000.00 towards the purchase, design and construction of a new park on the lands south of the TTC bus barns at Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue West or for the acquisition of other parkland in the vicinity of the site, of which $300,000.00 shall be payable prior to the introduction of the bills in Council and the balance payable prior to issuance of an above-grade building permit.  The latter instalment shall be indexed from the date of execution of the agreement to the date of payment in accordance with the Non-residential Construction Price Index for Toronto.  Such funds are over and above any requirements for park levies under s.42 of the Planning Act.

The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:

c.         incorporate, in the construction of the building, exterior materials shown on 1:50 scale drawings, approved by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, submitted for the development’s frontages along Eglinton Avenue East, Dunfield Avenue and Lillian Street;

d.         develop and implement to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, an appropriate Construction Mitigation Plan and Communication Strategy prior to the issuance of the first building permit (including demolition and/or excavation permit); and

e.         submit a wind tunnel analysis to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director and provision of any required mitigation measures contained therein to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director prior to the issuance of site plan approval.

4.         City Council require that, before the issuance of any building permit including foundation permit, the applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.

5.         City Council require the owner to provide and maintain an irrigation system for the proposed trees within the public road allowances, including an automatic timer designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and constructed with backflow preventer to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

6.         City Council require that the owner provide any necessary improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing review, if it is determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the site servicing review accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services.

7.         City Council require that, before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner submit a site servicing review to the Executive Director of Technical Services for review and acceptance.

This application is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes the construction of a 29-storey condominium tower at the west end of the site and a 26-storey tower at the east end of the site.  Tower heights include the podium levels beneath each.  The podium levels step from 5 to 6 storeys from west to east following the Eglinton Avenue frontage.  The applicant is proposing 2-storey retail bays which are accessed from grade within the podium levels along the Eglinton Avenue frontage.

The City Planning Division is recommending approval of the proposed development described above based on its location and on its planned and design attributes which include:

a.         the site is within a high rise Apartment Neighbourhood and is two blocks from the intersection of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue. It has excellent transit connections to most points within the City and is within proximity to retail, service and entertainment facilities and places of employment;

b.         the proposed redevelopment, which includes large-bay retail commercial spaces, will add variety to the current commercial mix on this section of Eglinton Avenue East.  Large-bay retail would be secured in the site-specific by-law which requires a minimum of 2,700 m2 of commercial space on the second floor;

c.         a portion of this site is currently underutilized as an unpaved, non-landscaped surface parking lot.  This development will fill-in and extend the continuous commercial uses for the full block of Eglinton Avenue East between Dunfield Avenue and Lillian Street;

d.         the proposed residential intensification of this site complies with the development criteria for new development in Mixed Use Areas and in Apartment Neighbourhoods designations of the Official Plan.  In particular, the location and massing of the building provides a reasonable transition and fit, between areas of different intensity and scale from the west side of Yonge Street to the east towards Mount Pleasant Road.  It also provides a reasonable transition and fit between areas of different land use from the site to the lands to the south which are designated Apartment Neighbourhoods;

e.         the proposed development complies with the Tall Buildings Guidelines. For example, the minimum separation distances between the proposed towers exceed the recommended minimum of 25 metres (the actual proposed separation ranges between 28 and 32 metres).  The separation distances between the proposed towers and the existing building to the south ranges between 26 and 36 metres and the tower floorplates meet the maximum average size of 750 square metres (not including balcony projections);

f.          the location and screening the loading bays, the parking ramp and garbage storage to the rear of the building off of a private through-laneway which connects Dunfield Avenue with Lillian Street minimizes the traffic and visual impact on the adjacent streets and residences; and

g.         the community benefits that would be available as a result of approval and construction of this development including funding for: the Central Eglinton Community Centre and funds to flow to the acquisition and development of new parks in the local area.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1073-2006, by replacing Plan 1 (Block Map) with the map attached to Attachment 1 to the report dated April 12, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to remove the holding symbol (“h”) from Blocks 32 and 36 in the Railway Lands West, being the lands municipally known as 150 and 170 Fort York Boulevard.

2.         The Bills related to the Zoning By-law Amendment be introduced to Council for enactment after the owner of Blocks 32 and 36 has entered into a Precinct Agreement satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

3.         City Council authorize execution of a Precinct Agreement for Blocks 32 and 36 to give effect to the foregoing and as described in this report.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

A Zoning By-law amendment application has been filed proposing the removal of the holding symbol (“h”) from the CR zoning on Blocks 32 and 36 of the Railway Lands West (RLW).  Block 32 comprises the lands municipally known as 150 Fort York Boulevard and Block 36 is 170 Fort York Boulevard.  The removal of the “h” will permit residential development with street related retail and service uses to proceed.

This report reviews the applicable Official Plan policies, recommends execution of the required Precinct Agreement and recommends approval of the application to amend Zoning By-law No. 073-2006, to remove the holding symbol.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to amend the Section 16 Agreement for 15 York Street as follows:

            -           Revise the location of bicycle parking to allow for bicycle parking to also be located on P3 and P4 levels.

The purpose of this report is to seek Council authorization to amend the Section 16 Agreement for 15 York Street to reflect minor changes to the location of bicycle parking.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the proposed replacement building for the property at 226 Queen Street West, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Robert Chang Architect Inc., dated March 3, 2010, subject  to the following conditions:

a.         Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the replacement structure located at 226 Queen Street West, including a permit for the demolition, excavation, and/or shoring of the subject property, the owner shall:

-           Eliminate the fifth storey, or that portion of the occupied floor area that is above 16 metres, to comply with both the Zoning By-law and Heritage Conservation District Plan.

-           Continue to work with Heritage Preservation Services regarding refinement of the final façade design along both street frontages, including, but not limited to, providing building permit drawings incorporating the following design elements:

-           Redesign and visually break the multi-level window and steel wall systems (contained within the individual building bays) to further define individual floor levels and be suitably compatible with exterior materials and traditional window openings (smaller, vertical proportioned windows “punched” into walls) that characterize the district.

-           Provide horizontal articulation or architectural detailing, such as a belt course, cornice or canopy to distinguish the ground level from the upper levels of the proposed structure, in order to frame the pedestrian space of the sidewalk, at the Queen Street West frontage.

-           Provide horizontal articulation or architectural detailing, such as cornice or sunshades, etc., at top of street wall façades to emphasize the street wall height and further frame the pedestrian zone.

-           Provide satisfactory exterior materials with compatible details and finishes (i.e., masonry clad spandrels instead of proposed recessed steel).

-           Provide storefront and entry elevations with materials and details notated.

-           Include architectural detail, such as vertical mullions to break large window surfaces, minimally 2” wide at ground level storefront and more prominent at upper levels. Butt-jointed storefront and window systems to be prohibited.

-           Include a water table or masonry base element to the storefront (below storefront framing).

b.         All drawings and information provided shall be satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2.         City Council approve the issuance of a demolition permit for the building at 226 Queen Street West within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District subject to the applicant obtaining a building for the replacement structure.

This report recommends approval of the demolition of the two-storey non-contributory commercial building at 226 Queen Street West (north side of the street). The proposed project would then construct a new five storey mixed-use replacement building. The demolition approval is conditional upon the applicant removing the fifth-storey of the proposed replacement building.

The property at 226 Queen Street West is included within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District (QSWHCD), which extends from University Avenue to Bathurst Street.  The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Queen Street West and McCaul Street (Attachment 1). The site has prominence as a corner location within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District.

The replacement structure as proposed would have an overall height of five stories or 19.5 metres (with a large rooftop penthouse further extending the height.) The proposed height is contrary to both the Zoning By-law provisions and the Heritage Conservation District Plan which permits structures to an absolute 16 metre height maximum.

The design of the project façades along both street frontages generally respects architectural characteristics of the district. However, further modification of various design elements would result in the project further complementing the fine-grain character that is expected in such heritage districts.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The Toronto Preservation Board recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the proposed replacement building for the property at 226 Queen Street West, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Robert Chang Architect Inc., dated March 3, 2010, subject to the following conditions:

a.         Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the replacement structure located at 226 Queen Street West, including a permit for the demolition, excavation, and/or shoring of the subject property, the owner shall:

-           Continue to work with Heritage Preservation Services regarding refinement of the final façade design along both street frontages, including, but not limited to, providing building permit drawings incorporating the following design elements:

-           Redesign and visually break the multi-level window and steel wall systems (contained within the individual building bays) to further define individual floor levels and be suitably compatible with exterior materials and traditional window openings (smaller, vertical proportioned windows “punched” into walls) that characterize the district.

-           Provide horizontal articulation or architectural detailing, such as a belt course, cornice or canopy to distinguish the ground level from the upper levels of the proposed structure, in order to frame the pedestrian space of the sidewalk, at the Queen Street West frontage.

-           Provide horizontal articulation or architectural detailing, such as cornice or sunshades, by way of a setback, at top of street wall façades to emphasize the street wall height and further frame the pedestrian zone.

-           Provide satisfactory exterior materials with compatible details and finishes (i.e., masonry clad spandrels instead of proposed recessed steel).

-           Provide storefront and entry elevations with materials and details notated.

-           Include architectural detail, such as vertical mullions to break large window surfaces, minimally 2” wide at ground level storefront and more prominent at upper levels. Butt-jointed storefront and window systems to be prohibited.

-           Include a water table or masonry base element to the storefront (below storefront framing).

b.         All drawings and information provided shall be satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2.         City Council approve the issuance of a demolition permit for the building at 226 Queen Street West within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District subject to the applicant obtaining a building permit for the replacement structure.

The Toronto Preservation Board on March 25, 2010, considered the report (March 8, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting 226 Queen Street West - Demolition and Replacement of a Structure within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District.

The Toronto Preservation Board recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council request the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division to report on any necessary amendments to the designating by-law, as outlined in the letter dated March 25, 2010, from Councillor Adam Vaughan, for the following:

a.         214 King Street West; and

b.         260 King Street West (including amendment of the Easement Agreement).

The Toronto Preservation Board on March 25, 2010, considered the communication (March 25, 2010) from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina, respecting Heritage Properties on King Street West between Simcoe Street and Duncan Street.

Toronto Building recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Refuse the application to demolish the subject residential building at 487 Dupont Street because there is no permit for a replacement building on the site.  OR 

2.         Approve the application to demolish the subject residential building at 487 Dupont Street without conditions. OR

3.         Approve the application to demolish the subject residential building at 487 Dupont Street with the following conditions:

a.         that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; and

b.         that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.

In accordance with City-wide residential demolition control under Article II, Demolition Control, of Municipal Code Ch. 363. as amended by By-law No. 1009-2006, enacted by the City Council on September 27, 2006, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, I refer the demolition application for 487 Dupont Street to you, to decide whether to grant or refuse the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit.

This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Not applicable.

The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that:

1.         City Council deny the request for permission to remove one (1) healthy City-owned tree adjacent to 79 Boulton Drive.

The report requests that City Council deny the request for permission to remove a healthy City-owned honey locust tree. The applicant is proposing to construct a new home and the tree is in conflict with the required construction. 

The tree in question has been well maintained, is healthy and with proper care and maintenance should continue to provide benefits to the community for many years. Urban Forestry cannot support the loss of this tree.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for an extension of the operating hours of the boulevard café, from 11:00 p.m. daily to 2:00 a.m. daily, for the establishment known as Philthy McNasty's located at 130 Eglinton Avenue East.  OR

2.         Approve the request for an extension of the operating hours of the boulevard café, from 11:00 p.m. daily to 2:00 a.m. daily, for the establishment known as Philthy McNasty's located at 130 Eglinton Avenue East.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

To report on a request received from the business owner for an extension of the boulevard café permit operating hours from 11:00 p.m. daily to 2:00 a.m. daily located at 130 Eglinton Avenue East, operating as Philthy McNasty’s.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the application for the proposed boulevard café at 307 Wellesley Street East.  OR

2.         Approve the application for the proposed boulevard café at 307 Wellesley Street East.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

To report on the results of a public poll and refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards, based on the results of the public poll and physical criteria inspection conducted in the matter of an application for a boulevard café permit on the 307 Wellesley Street East, as requested by Councillor McConnell.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Cancel the sidewalk boulevard vending permit for 1 Dundas Street West, 18.0m west of Yonge Street, 9.1m south of curb on Dundas Street West with no relocation. OR

2.         Cancel the sidewalk boulevard vending permit for 1 Dundas Street West, 18.0m west of Yonge Street, 9.1m south of curb on Dundas Street West and provide direction to the relocation of the existing vendor. OR

3.         Allow the existing vendor to remain in the current location at 1 Dundas Street West, 18.0m west of Yonge Street, 9.1m south of curb on Dundas Street West.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

To report on a request received from the property owners at 1 Dundas Street West to relocate the existing sidewalk boulevard vendor located on the west side of Yonge Street, 9.1m south of the curb at Dundas Street West.

The intersecting corners of Yonge Street and Dundas Street have changed considerably with the addition of new buildings, Yonge Dundas Square and the scramble intersection. Pedestrian traffic in the area has increased significantly. To ease pedestrian congestion, the relocation of the existing vendor in front of the H&M store has been requested.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Cancel with no relief from the moratorium the sidewalk boulevard vending permits at 382-388 Yonge Street and portrait artist locations, due to construction of a new condominium building. OR

2.         Cancel the sidewalk boulevard vending permits and portrait artist locations at 382-388 Yonge Street and grant relief from the moratorium in order to allow for an application to be considered for alternative locations from the vendors. AND

3.         Eliminate the 6 portrait artist locations from the inventory and consult with the Councillors of Wards 20, 27 and 28 for potential new locations and report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the outcome.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

To report on the cancellation of two sidewalk/boulevard vending permits and six portrait artist locations as result of construction activities to the adjacent property.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for commercial boulevard parking at 866 Bloor Street West.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal for commercial boulevard parking for one space for the ground floor occupant of 866 Bloor Street West.  We do not recommend approval of commercial boulevard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 313.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for right angled commercial boulevard parking at 770 Queen Street West.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal for right angled parking from the owner of 770 Queen Street West for parking.  We do not recommend approval for right angled commercial boulevard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code.  The applicant will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for front yard parking at 10 Belle Ayre Boulevard.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 10 Belle Ayre Boulevard for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for front yard parking at 27 Glebe Road East.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 27 Glebe Road East for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for front yard parking at 76 Taunton Road.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 76 Taunton Road for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for front yard parking at 101 Knox Avenue.

2.         Request that the paving be removed and the area restored to soft landscaping as shown on Appendix ‘E’, attached to the report dated April 1, 2010, from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 101 Knox Avenue for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for front yard parking at 58 Scarborough Road.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 58 Scarborough Road for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Deny the request for front yard parking at 204 Silver Birch Avenue.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 204 Silver Birch Avenue for front yard parking.  We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918.  The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.

There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the 430 King Street West - The Charlie - Public Art Plan, attached to the report dated April 6, 2010, from the Director, Urban Design.

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 430 King Street West - The Charlie - Public Art Plan.  The plan has been prepared by the owner in compliance with the development approval provisions.  The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in the publicly accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

The 430 King Street West - The Charlie - Public Art Plan provides a framework for a public art commission in the proposed location of King Street West and Charlotte Street.  The attached plan meets the objectives of the City Planning Percent for the Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         The Toronto and East York Community Council determine that the community consultation meeting held at the request of the Ward Councillor on Thursday April 8, 2010, satisfies the requirement for such meeting as normally held after the Preliminary Planning Report has been heard on a Community Council agenda. Notice was given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

2.         Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This application was made on February 17, 2010 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes to convert three existing single detached dwellings at 362, 366 and 368 Balliol Street from residential use to private school use in conjunction with the adjacent Greenwood College School.

This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's direction on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.

A community meeting was held in the neighbourhood on Thursday April 8, 2010.  A statutory public meeting is targeted for the summer of 2010.  This target date assumes that applicant will provide all required information in a timely manner.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.

2.         Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

3.         Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes to construct a new 11-storey, 134-unit, mixed-use building at 272, 274 and 280 Donlands Avenue and the rear portion of 249 Cosburn Avenue.  The property at 243 Cosburn Avenue is proposed to be used to access loading and servicing facilities.  The two existing buildings at 243 and 249 Cosburn Avenue are not proposed to be demolished.

This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.

A Community Consultation meeting is anticipated for late spring 2010, with a final report and statutory Public Meeting targeted for 2011.  The target dates assume that the applicant will provide all required information in a timely manner.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The City Planning Division recommends that:

1.         Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.

2.         Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

3.         The applicant provide notice of the community consultation meeting to the tenants at 90 Eastdale Avenue and 2 Secord Avenue.

4.         Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

This application proposes two new residential buildings at the lands municipally known as 2 Secord Avenue and 90 Eastdale Avenue.  An 18-storey, 144-unit residential building with a 2-storey base and 5, two-storey residential units at grade is proposed at 2 Secord Avenue.  A 26-storey, 216-unit residential building with a 2-storey base and 6, two-storey residential units at grade is proposed at 90 Eastdale Avenue.  The two new residential buildings are proposed to be condominium.

Attached to the new building at 90 Eastdale Avenue, a 2-storey recreational facility with pool and community rooms is proposed.  This recreational facility is proposed to be for the exclusive use of the existing tenants at 2 Secord Avenue and 90 Eastdale Avenue.  A recreational facility for the use of the condominium owners would be provided for in the new building located at 90 Eastdale Avenue.

The existing 22-storey rental building at 2 Secord Avenue, the 24-storey rental building at 90 Eastdale Avenue, and the 9 townhouse blocks which contain a total of 52 rental townhouse units are proposed to be maintained.

This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.

A Community Consultation meeting is anticipated to be held in the second quarter of 2010 with a Statutory Public Meeting targeted for early 2011.  The target dates assume that applicant will provide all required information in a timely manner.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

The Toronto Building Division recommends that:

1.         City Council authorize the Clerk for the City of Toronto to provide public “Notice of Decision”, costs to be paid by the applicant, for the establishment of a private family mausoleum within the Mount Pleasant Cemetery, known municipally as 375 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, ON, and

a.         send a copy of City Council’s decision to the applicant and the Registrar, Cemeteries Regulations Branch, Ministry of Consumer Services.

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

This staff report is based on an application brought forward by Glen E. Timney, Director of Development, Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries.

A private family mausoleum is proposed by the interment rights holder and is larger than 15 cubic metres, the owner is required to obtain consent from the Registrar, Cemeteries Regulations Branch, Ministry of Consumer Services under the Cemeteries Act (Revised). The purpose of this report is to provide the required public notice of the establishment of a private family mausoleum on a lot located in Plot S in the Mount Pleasant Cemetery, 375 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario.

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

Toronto Fire Services recommends that:

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880-Fire Routes:

-          20 Sunlight Park Road.

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

There are no financial implications associated with this report.

Toronto Fire Services recommends that:

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880-Fire Routes:

-          1400 O’Connor Drive.

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

There are no financial implications associated with this report.

Toronto Fire Services recommends that:

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880-Fire Routes:

-          1-35 Tompkins Mews.

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

There are no financial implications associated with this report.

The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Rename Harbord Park located at 323 Harbord Street to “Art Eggleton Park” in honour of Mr. Eggleton’s significant contributions to the City of Toronto.

This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report responds to the request made at Toronto and East York Community Council regarding the renaming of Harbord Park situated at 323 Harbord Street in honour of Art Eggleton, Toronto’s longstanding Mayor and later a member of the Canadian House of Commons and the Senate.

The Parks, Forestry, and Recreation staff is recommending that Harbord Park situated at 323 Harbord Street be officially renamed “Art Eggleton Park” in honour of Mr. Eggleton’s significant contributions to the City of Toronto.

Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff have exercised due diligence in ensuring that all criteria in the Naming and Renaming for Parks and Recreation Facilities and Parks Policy have been met.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Rename Carr Street Parkette located at 47 Denison Avenue to “Randy Padmore Park” in honour of Mr. Padmore’s significant contributions to the Alexandra Park community and City of Toronto.

This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report responds to the request made at Toronto and East York Community Council regarding the renaming of Carr Street Parkette situated at 47 Denison Avenue in honour of Arthur Randolph Padmore.

Parks, Forestry, and Recreation staff is recommending that Carr Street Parkette situated at 47 Denison Avenue be officially renamed “Randy Padmore Park” in honour of Mr. Padmore’s significant contributions to the Alexandra Park community and the City of Toronto.

Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff have exercised due diligence in ensuring that all criteria in the Naming and Renaming for Parks and Recreation Facilities Policy have been met. 

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The City Surveyor recommends that:

1.         The proposed private access road at 351 Wallace Avenue be named “Elsie Mews”.  

2.         Montevallo Developments Limited pay the cost, estimated to be $300.00, for the fabrication and installation of a street name sign.

3.         The owners or their succesors of the subject lands shall maintain, at their own risk, the signage installed under Recommendation 2 of this staff report.

4.         The appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction of a naming by-law.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report recommends that the name “Elsie Mews” be approved to identify the private access road at the residential development at 351 Wallace Avenue.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. The estimated cost of $300.00 for the street name sign will be paid by the applicant.

The City Surveyor recommends that:

1.         Dundas Street West between Shaw Street and Ossington Avenue be ceremonially designated with special street name signs as “Frank Alvarez Way”.

2.         Transportation Services fabricate and install the appropriate signage at this location.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report recommends that the section of Dundas Street West between Shaw Street and Ossington Avenue be designated as “Frank Alvarez Way.”

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The City Surveyor recommends that:

1.         The public lane east of Melita Crescent between Lambertlodge Avenue and Wychcrest Avenue, be named “Tony Silipo Way”.

2.         City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to implement the foregoing including the introduction of a by-law.

This is a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report recommends that the public lane east of Melita Crescent between Lambertlodge Avenue and Wychcrest Avenue, be named “Tony Silipo Way”.

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

The Chief Corporate Officer recommends that:

1.         City Council authorize acceptance of the Offer to Purchase from Daniel Rajanayagam to purchase a portion of vacant land located at the rear of 16 Ripon Road, being Part of Lot 295, Plan M395, City of Toronto, shown as Parts 2 and 5 on Sketch No. PS-2006-151b, subject to an easement in favour of Bell Canada (the “Property”), in the amount of $25,000.00, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” attached to the report dated April 8, 2010, from the Chief Corporate Officer.

2.         City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to accept the Offer to Purchase on behalf of the City.

3.         City Council authorize that a portion of the proceeds of closing be directed to fund the outstanding expenses related to the Property and the completion of the sale transaction.

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the sale of a portion of the City-owned parcel of vacant land at the rear of 16 Ripon Road.  Negotiations with the adjoining owners at 16 Ripon Road have resulted in the Offer to Purchase that is being recommended for acceptance.

The terms for completing the transaction as set out herein are considered to be fair, reasonable and reflective of market value.

Revenue in the amount of $25,000.00 (net of GST), less closing costs and the usual adjustments is anticipated.

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

The Chief Corporate Officer recommends that:

1.         City Council authorize acceptance of the Offer to Purchase from Surya Bhan Singh, Susan Shashi Lata Singh and Urmila Singh to purchase a portion of vacant land located at the rear of 18 Ripon Road, being Part of Lot 295, Plan M395, City of Toronto, shown as Parts 3 and 6 on Sketch No. PS-2006-151b, subject to an easement in favour of Bell Canada (the “Property”), in the amount of $30,000.00, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” to the report dated April 7, 2010, from the Chief Corporate Officer.

2.         City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to accept the Offer to Purchase on behalf of the City.

3.         City Council authorize that a portion of the proceeds of closing be directed to fund the outstanding expenses related to the Property and the completion of the sale transaction.

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the sale of a portion of the City-owned parcel of vacant land at the rear of 18 Ripon Road.  Negotiations with the adjoining owners at 18 Ripon Road have resulted in the Offer to Purchase that is being recommended for acceptance.

The terms for completing the transaction as set out herein are considered to be fair, reasonable and reflective of market value.

Revenue in the amount of $30,000.00 (net of GST), less closing costs and the usual adjustments is anticipated.

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

The General Manager of Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer recommend that:

1.         City Council delete Motion No. 1 of Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE9.40, as adopted by City Council at its meeting held on October 22 and 23, 2007, and replace it with the following:

a.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of a portion of River Street and a portion of the un-named Link Road, shown as Parts 1 and 2, respectively, on the attached Sketch No. PS-2010-015 (the “Link Road”) to the report dated April 6, 2010, from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer, as public highways, upon construction, conveyance to the City and dedication of the new Bayview Avenue extension, subject to compliance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162.

The purpose of this report is to seek an amendment to Motion No.1 of Item TE9.40, adopted by City Council at its meeting of October 22 and 23, 2007, authorizing the closure and lease of  a part of the un-named Link Road west of Old Brewery Lane, extending between River Street and Bayview Avenue; authorizing a five year lease to Ontario Realty Corporation for nominal rent; declaring the subject portion of the Link Road to be surplus; and authorizing the Chief Corporate Officer to negotiate with Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for the possible disposal of all or part of the subject portion of the Link Road.  The subject amendment is required because the boundaries of the area to be closed are slightly different than what was reported to City Council at the time.

There are no financial implications arising from this report.

The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer recommend that:

1.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of a portion of the MacPherson Avenue boulevard, shown as Part 1 on the attached Sketch No. PS-2010-011 (the “Highway”), to the report dated April 7, 2010, from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer, subject to compliance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code 162 and following City Council’s approval of the sale of the Highway. 

2.         City Council direct Transportation Services staff to give notice to the public of a proposed by-law to close the Highway in accordance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 162, with the Toronto and East York Community Council to hear any member of the public who wishes to speak to the matter during consideration of the proposed by-law.

3.         City Council direct Transportation Services staff to advise the public of the proposed closure of the Highway prior to implementation, in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for Schedule “A+” activities, by posting notice of the proposed closure on the Notices' page of the City of Toronto’s web site for at least five working days prior to the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting at which the proposed by-law to close the Highway will be considered.

4.         City Council authorize the City to enter into a Land Exchange Agreement with the owner of 262 Avenue Road, Centricity Properties Corp. (“Centricity”) for a portion of the private lane lands at the rear of 262 Avenue Road, shown as Part 2 on Sketch No. PS-2010-011 (the “Part 2 Lands”), in exchange for the Highway, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” to the report dated April 7, 2010, from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer.

5.         City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to execute the Land Exchange Agreement on behalf of the City.

6.         City Council direct Technical Services staff to dedicate the Part 2 Lands for public lane purposes upon completion of the Land Exchange Agreement.

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms and as she considers reasonable.

The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer request that a portion of the MacPherson Avenue boulevard abutting 262 Avenue Road be permanently closed and exchanged for a portion of private lane lands at the rear of 262 Avenue Road, owned by Centricity Properties Corp., substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in the attached Appendix “A”.

The terms for completing the transaction, as set out herein, are considered to be fair, reasonable and reflective of market value.

The closing and sale of the Highway in exchange for the Part 2 Lands will not result in any costs to the City as Centricity is required to pay all costs associated with the land exchange.

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer recommend that:

1.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of the public lane, shown as Part 1 on the attached Sketch No. PS-2009-001 (the “Lane”), to the report dated April 8, 2010, from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer, subject to compliance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162.

2.         City Council direct Transportation Services staff to give notice to the public of a proposed by-law to close the Lane in accordance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 162, with the Toronto and East York Community Council to hear any member of the public who wishes to speak to the matter during consideration of the proposed by-law.

3.         City Council direct Transportation Services staff to advise the public of the proposed closure of the Lane prior to implementation, in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for Schedule “A+” activities, by posting notice of the proposed closure on the Notices' page of the City of Toronto’s web site for at least five working days prior to the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting at which the proposed by-law to close the Lane will be considered.

4.         City Council accept the Offer to Purchase from Norie Clare Campbell (the “Purchaser”) to purchase the portion of the Lane shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2009-001 in the amount of $80,000.00, plus applicable taxes, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” to the report dated April 8, 2010, from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other terms as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Office and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

5.         City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to accept the Offer to Purchase on behalf of the City.

6.         City Council grant authority to direct a portion of the proceeds of closing to fund the outstanding expenses related to the Lane and the completion of the sale transaction.

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Corporate Officer request that the public lane extending westerly from Alvin Avenue between 50 and 54 Alvin Avenue be permanently closed and that the public lane be sold to the adjoining land owner, Norie Clare Campbell, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in the attached Appendix “A”.

The terms for completing the transaction, as set out herein, are considered to be fair, reasonable and reflective of market value.

The closing of the Lane will not result in any costs to the City as the Purchaser is required to pay all costs associated with the closing.

The City anticipates revenue in the amount of $80,000.00, (net of GST), less closing costs and the usual adjustments from the sale of the Lane. 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approve the narrowing of Shaw Street, Beatrice Street, Gore Vale Avenue, Bellwoods Avenue, Claremont Street, Euclid Street, Palmerston Avenue, and Markham Street at Dundas Street West, generally as shown in the print of Drawing Nos. 421F-9301 and 421F-9302, dated March 2010, attached to the report dated March 16, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Transportation Services recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the narrowing of Dundas Street West, from a width of 14.7 metres to a width of 12.9 metres by widening the sidewalks on the north and south sides of Dundas Street West, between Markham Street and Bathurst Street, generally as shown in the attached print of Drawing No. 421F-9974, dated March 2010.

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to narrow the north and south sides of Dundas Street West, between Markham Street and Bathurst Street for the purpose of widening the sidewalks.

The proposal is to narrow Dundas Street West, from a width of 14.7 metres to a width of 12.9 metres by widening the sidewalks a further 0.9 metres on the north and south sides of Dundas Street West, from Markham Street to Bathurst Street. 

This road alteration coupled with narrowed sections of eight local streets intersecting with Dundas Street West, between Shaw Street and Bathurst Street (addressed in a separate report to Toronto and East York Community Council) will enhance pedestrian safety.  These initiatives are in conjunction with on-going road and sidewalk restoration work associated with the Dundas Street West streetcar track reconstruction, completed in 2008.  Work will be undertaken as part of the planned road and sidewalk restoration scheduled in this area for 2010.

The Transportation Services Division 2010 Capital Budget includes funding in the amount of $2 million dollars for new sidewalk construction.  These funds have already been allocated to previously approved projects.  If Community Council recommends widening Leeds Street and Roblocke Avenue and constructing a sidewalk on the west side of Roblocke Avenue, the estimated cost will be about $140,000.00.  Scheduling and construction will be subject to funding availability and competing priorities.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Rescind the “No Parking, Anytime” regulation on the east side of Manning Avenue, between Queen Street West and Ulster Street.

2.         Approve implementation of a “No Parking, Anytime” regulation on the east side of Manning Avenue, between Queen Street West and a point 41.4 metres north of Robinson Street.

3.         Approve implementation of a “No Parking, Anytime” regulation on the east side of Manning Avenue, between a point 74.4 metres north of Robinson Street and Ulster Street.

4.         Approve implementation of a “No Parking, 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 a.m., Monday to Friday and Anytime, Saturday and Sunday” regulation on the east side of Manning Avenue, between a point 41.4 metres north of Robinson Street and a point 33.0 metres north.

5.         Approve implementation of “15-minute maximum parking, from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the east side of Manning Avenue, between a point 41.4 metres north of Robinson Street and a point 33.0 metres north.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to designate a “Student Pick-up/Drop-off Area”, with parking allowed for a maximum of 15 minutes, from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Manning Avenue, adjacent to Charles G. Fraser Public School (79 Manning Avenue).  The student pick-up/drop-off area will provide short-term parking opportunities for parents/guardians to accompany students to/from the school as well as a daycare that operates at this location.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Reduce the overnight on-street permit parking hours of operation on Lennox Street, between Palmerston Boulevard and Markham Street, from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., 7 days a week, to 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Area residents requested the reduction of the overnight on-street permit parking hours on Lennox Street, between Palmerston Boulevard and Markham Street, from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., 7 days a week, to 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week. 

The reduction of the overnight on-street permit parking hours would allow non permit holders, such as visitors and tradespersons, to park during non-permit parking hours, without being subject to tagging by Parking Enforcement.

Transportation Services recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approve the installation and removal of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities at the locations identified in the Appendix A attached to the report dated April 8, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.  The purpose is to obtain approval for the installation/removal of a number of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities.

Transportation Services recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the installation of an on-street parking space for persons with disabilities on the north side of Cosburn Avenue, between a point 120.5 metres east of Todmorden Lane and a point 5.5. metres further east.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of an on-street parking space for persons with disabilities on the north side of Cosburn Avenue, east of Todmorden Lane. As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Cosburn Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Rescind the “No Parking, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the west side of Bowmore Road, between a point 68 metres north of Wrenson Road and a point 68 metres south of Gerrard Street East.

2.         Implement a “No Parking, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the west side of Bowmore Road, between a point 69 metres north of Wrenson Road and a point 80 metres further north.

3.         Implement a “No Parking, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the west side of Bowmore Road, between a point 72 metres south of Gerrard Street East and a point 58 metres further south.

4.         Implement a “15-minute maximum parking, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the west side of Bowmore Road, between a point 130 metres south of Gerrard Street East and a point 30 metres further south.

5.         Implement a “No Parking, from 9:30 a.m. to11:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the west side of Bowmore Road, between a point 130 metres south of Gerrard Street East and a point 30 metres further south.

6.         Amend the “School Bus Loading Zone” regulation on the west side of Bowmore Road, to be in effect between a point 69 metres north of Wrenson Road and a point 80 metres further north.

This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

At the request of Councillor Sandra Bussin, in consultation with the Principal of Bowmore Public School and local residents, Transportation Services is seeking authority to designate a 15-minute-maximum parking area on the west side of Bowmore Road, south of Gerrard Street East. This proposed 30 metre-long short-term student pick-up/drop-off area is intended to address concerns with illegal parking and ensuing traffic congestion in front of Bowmore Public School during school arrival and dismissal times.

To allow the above, the existing 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, parking prohibition on the west side of Bowmore Road would have to be reduced by 30 metres.  These changes would result in five short-term parking spaces and a more controlled parking environment.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approve the removal of the existing on-street loading zone for disabled persons on the east side of Beatrice Street, between a point 78.4 metres north of College Street and a point 6.2 metres further north.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has investigated and recommends the removal of the designated on-street loading zone for disabled persons on the east side of Beatrice Street, north of College Street.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approve the installation of a designated on-street loading zone for disabled persons, operating from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., daily, on the west side of Euclid Avenue from a point 136.5 metres north of College Street to a point 5.5 metres further north.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services was requested to establish a disabled parking space fronting No. 428 Euclid Avenue.  It was determined through investigation that a pick-up and drop-off zone for disabled persons operating between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., daily is more appropriate to address the needs of the disabled resident.  The loading zone will provide curb-side access for a disabled resident at 428 Euclid Avenue during the hours it is required without eliminating an overnight permit parking space.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Approve the installation of an on-street pick-up and drop-off zone for disabled persons operating from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Scott Street from a point 29.7 metres north of Front Street East to a point 11 metres further north.

2.         Rescind the existing ‘No Parking Anytime’ regulation on both sides of Scott Street, from Front Street East to Wellington Street East.

3.         Prohibit parking at all times on the east side of Scott Street from Front Street East to Wellington Street East.

4.         Prohibit parking at all times on the west side of Scott Street from Front Street East to a point 29.7 metres north, and from a point 40.7 metres north of Front Street East to Wellington Street East.

5.         Prohibit parking from 7:00 p.m. of one day to 9:00 a.m. of the following day, Monday to Friday, and at all times Saturday and Sunday on the west side of Scott Street from a point 29.7 metres north of Front Street East to a point 11 metres further north.

This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to establish a pick-up and drop-off zone for disabled persons fronting the rear entrance to 33 Yonge Street operating between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday. The loading zone will provide curb-side access for Wheel-Trans vehicles servicing a disabled employee at that address and will not negatively impact existing on-street activities.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Designate a commercial loading zone to operate at all times on the north side of Lombard Street, from a point 24.1 metres east of Victoria Street to a point 6 metres further east.

2.         Rescind the existing ‘No Standing Anytime’ regulation on the north side of Lombard Street, from a point 24.1 metres east of Victoria Street to a point 6 metres further east.

This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to establish a commercial loading zone on the north side of Lombard Street, just east of Victoria Street. The introduction of the commercial loading zone will provide for the loading/unloading of goods to local businesses on Lombard Street and Victoria Street at all times.

All costs associated with installation of the commercial loading zone, including an annual fee, will be the responsibility of the business owner.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Prohibit vehicles over 2.0 metres in width from travelling in Filmic Lane between Badgerow Avenue and a point 48 metres south of Badgerow Avenue.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services is seeking authority to prohibit vehicles over 2.0 metres in width from travelling in a section of Filmic Lane to help reduce damage to private property.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Reduce the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h speed limit on Binswood Avenue, Roblin Avenue, Glebemount Avenue and Norlong Boulevard, between O’Connor Drive and Cosburn Avenue.

2.         Reduce the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Rednor Road, between Plains Road and Cosburn Avenue.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to introduce 40 km/h speed limits on various roads in the neighbourhood bounded by Coxwell Avenue, O’Connor Drive, Woodbine Avenue and Cosburn Avenue.

Transportation Services recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Not approve reducing the maximum speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Peard Road, between Squires Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue.

This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.  Transportation Services staff have investigated reducing the maximum speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Peard Road, between Squires Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue.

Based on an assessment of the speed profile and neighbourhood environment, Peard Road, between Squires Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue, does not satisfy the 40 km/h warrants.

The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact.

If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides that reducing the existing speed limit from 50km/h to 40 km/h on Peard Road, between Squires Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result.

The estimated cost for installing four signs would be $800.00. Funds have been allocated in the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget.

Transportation Services recommends that:

1.         City Council amend the turn and straight through regulations at the intersections of: Eglinton Avenue West and Old Forest Hill Road; Eglinton Avenue West and Vesta Drive; and Eglinton Avenue West and Gardiner Road, outlined in Appendix A of the report dated April 5, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

In 2009, the various turn prohibitions and/or straight-through traffic movements at the intersections of Eglinton Avenue West at Old Forest Hill Road, Vesta Drive, and Gardiner Road were temporarily rescinded to enhance traffic operation along Eglinton Avenue West, between Bathurst Street and Chaplin Crescent during bridge reconstruction on Eglinton Avenue West, east of Spadina Road and replacement of a watermain along this section of Eglinton Avenue West. The bridge reconstruction work was completed in August 2009 but the watermain work has been delayed.

Given the many complaints Transportation Services and the Ward Councillor have received about traffic infiltration in the residential neighbourhood, south of Eglinton Avenue West, and the deferral of further construction along this section of Eglinton Avenue West for the time being, the regulations that were temporarily rescinded in 2009 should be reinstated.

Transportation Services recommends that:

1.         City Council approve the installation of a pedestrian traffic control signal on Queen’s Park Crescent East, just south of Grosvenor Street.

Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of a pedestrian traffic control signal on Queen’s Park Crescent East, just south of Grosvenor Street.

The number of pedestrians observed crossing Queen’s Park Crescent near Grosvenor Street, and the delays they incur, is sufficient to justify either a pedestrian crossover or traffic control signals.  Given the nature of this street, with four lanes for northbound traffic and the curvature around Queen’s Park, the most appropriate device to assist pedestrians is a traffic control signal for pedestrians only.

The estimated cost of installing a pedestrian traffic control signal on Queen’s Park Crescent East, just south of Grosvenor Street is estimated at $90,000. Funds in the amount of $2,750,000.00 have been allocated in the 2010 Transportation Services Capital Budget for installation of traffic control signals.  This work would be subject to competing priorities and available funding.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Not authorize the installation of speed humps on Hocken Avenue, between Vaughan Road and Wychwood Avenue.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

This report summarizes the results of the traffic calming poll undertaken on Hocken Avenue, between Vaughan Road and Wychwood Avenue.  The poll results indicated a response rate of less than 50 percent plus one, as required in the traffic calming policy. Accordingly, installation of speed humps is not recommended on Hocken Avenue, between Vaughan Road and Wychwood Avenue.

At the request of Councillor Joe Mihevc, we are providing the results of the poll.

Adoption of the above-noted recommendation has no financial impact.  If  Toronto and East York Community Council decides to approve the installation of speed humps on Hocken Avenue, the following financial impact will result:

1.         The estimated cost of installing three speed humps on Hocken Avenue, between Vaughan Road and Wychwood Avenue, is $9,000.00.  Funds in the amount of $418,000.00 are contained in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives.  The installation of speed humps on Hocken Avenue is subject to competing priorities and funding availability.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Not authorize installation of speed humps on Anderson Avenue, between Oriole Parkway and Duplex Avenue.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has investigated installing speed humps on Anderson Avenue, between Oriole Parkway and Duplex Avenue, to address residents’ concerns with the speed of traffic.

Staff’s assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been met.  Therefore, installation of speed humps on Anderson Avenue is not recommended.

The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact.  If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Anderson Avenue, between Oriole Parkway and Duplex Avenue, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:

1.         The estimated cost for installing 4 speed humps would be $12,000.00.  Funds in the amount of $418,000 have been allocated in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives.  Installing speed humps on Anderson Avenue is subject to competing priorities and funding availability.

Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:

1.         Not authorize installation of speed humps on Duplex Avenue, between Anderson Avenue and Duplex Crescent.

This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Transportation Services has investigated installing speed humps on Duplex Avenue, between Anderson Avenue and Duplex Crescent, to address residents’ concerns with the speed of traffic.

Staff’s assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been met.  Therefore, installation of speed humps on Duplex Avenue is not recommended.

The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact.  If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Duplex Avenue, between Anderson Avenue and Duplex Crescent, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:

1.         The estimated cost for installing 2 speed humps would be $6,000.00.  Funds in the amount of $418,000 have been allocated in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives.  Installing speed humps on Duplex Avenue is subject to competing priorities and funding availability.