![]() |
Agenda |
Consolidated |
Toronto and East York Community Council |
Meeting No. | 36 | Contact | Rosalind Dyers, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 |
Phone | 416-392-7033 | |
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
teycc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Council Chamber, City Hall
|
Chair | Councillor Pam McConnell |
Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.
Special Assistance for Members of the Public: City staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call 416-392-7033, TTY 416-338-0889 or e-mail: teycc@toronto.ca.
Closed Meeting Requirements: If the Toronto and East York Community Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the committee must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Committee has to meet privately.(City of Toronto Act, 2006)
Notice to people writing or making presentations to the Toronto and East York Community Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.
The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.
The City videotapes committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be videotaping you and City staff may make the video tapes available to the public.
If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or by calling 416-392-7033.
Schedule of Timed Items 10:00 a.m.: Items TE36.1 to TE36.17 1:30 p.m.: Items TE36.18 to TE36.26 4:00 p.m.: Items TE36.27 to TE36.35 5:00 p.m.: Items TE36.36 to TE36.52
Declaration of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act
Confirmation of Minutes – June 22, 2010
Speakers/Presentations – A complete list will be distributed at the meeting
Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Bill to Confirm the Proceedings of Community Council will be last items. |
||||||
TE36.1 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Permanent Closure of the Portion of the Public Lane Abutting the East Limit of 295 Adelaide Street West |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor |
Recommendations |
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close as a public highway the portion of the public lane abutting the east limit of 295 Adelaide Street West, described as follows:
Part of PIN 21412-0183 (LT) Being a portion the Lane on Plan 37E, Designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-24890 Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office (No. 66). |
Summary |
To enact a by-law to permanently close the portion of the public lane abutting the east limit of 295 Adelaide Street West as a public highway, and that the property be sold upon the terms and conditions set out in Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE32.21, adopted by City Council at its meeting on March 31 and April 2, 2010. |
Background Information |
TE36.1 - Draft By-law - Closure of Portion of Public Lane Abutting 295 Adelaide Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32444.pdf) |
TE36.2 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 22 |
Permanent Closure of the Untravelled Portion of MacPherson Avenue |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Origin |
(August 3, 2010) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor |
Recommendations |
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close as a public highway the portion of the public highway known as MacPherson Avenue, described as follows:
Part of PIN 21218-0161 (LT) Part of Lots 1 and 2, Plan M162, part of MacPherson Avenue, Plan M18 Designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-25014 City of Toronto Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office, (No. 66). |
Summary |
To enact a by-law to permanently close an untravelled portion of MacPherson Avenue, abutting 262 Avenue Road, and be sold upon the terms and conditions set out in Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE33.41, as adopted by City Council at its meeting held on May 11 and 12, 2010. |
Background Information |
TE36.2 - Draft By law - Closure of Untravelled Portion of MacPherson Boulevard (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32443.pdf) |
TE36.3 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 28 |
Permanent Closure of a Portion of Market Street |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Origin |
(August 3, 2010) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor |
Recommendations |
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close as a public highway the portion of Market Street, described as follows:
Part of PIN 21397-0049 (LT) Being Part of West Market Place, The Esplanade Plan 5A Toronto (AKA Market Street) Between The Esplanade and ES6852; Toronto, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-25034 City of Toronto Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office (No. 66). |
Summary |
To enact a by-law to permanently close a portion of Market Street as a public highway in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.44, as adopted by City Council at its meeting held on June 8 and 9, 2010. |
Background Information |
TE36.3 - Draft By-law - Closure of Portion of Market Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32445.pdf) |
TE36.4 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 14 |
Final Report - 1205 Queen Street West - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 1205 Queen Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the July 21, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council approve the proposed development at 1205 Queen Street West prior to the completion of an Avenue study.
4. City Council require, prior to the enactment of Bills, written confirmation to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division from the Executive Director of Technical Services that all outstanding issues with respect to the applicant's Site Servicing and Stormwater Management Reports have been addressed to their satisfaction.
5. City Council authorizes City officials to take all necessary steps to give effect to the above-noted recommendations. |
Summary |
The application was made prior to January 1, 2007 and is not subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The applicant seeks permission to construct an eight (8) storey residential condominium consisting of 66 dwelling units with retail at grade at 1205 Queen Street West. Access to parking and loading for the proposed building will be from the lane on the south edge of the property and a total of 64 parking spaces will be provided.
Mid-rise housing is an important form of development creating new housing and shopping opportunities and helps the City address reurbanization objectives on Avenues.
Queen Street West continues to experience growth and reinvestment east of the CNR/CPR railway corridor. This is the first project proposed for the area west of the rail corridor and represents a form of development that is consistent and compatible with its surroundings.
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the proposed development. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.4 - Staff Report - 1205 Queen Street West - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32446.pdf) |
TE36.5 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 18 |
Refusal Report - 953 Dufferin Street - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council refuse Application No 10 213474 STE 18 OZ for 953 Dufferin Street because a ‘house behind a house’:
- conflicts with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe; - is inconsistent with the Provincial Policy Statement; - does not conform to the Official Plan; and - is not permitted by Zoning By-law 438-86.
2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with the appropriate City staff, to attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearing for Application No. 10 213474 STE 18 OZ to support the positions recommended in the report dated July 27, 2010 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The application proposes to rezone the property at 953 Dufferin Street to permit a two-storey “house behind a house” and the conversion of the main house into a converted house containing six dwelling units with an average size of 41.7 square metres.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.5 - Staff Report - 953 Dufferin Street - Rezoning- Refusal Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32447.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 9, 2010) Letter from Councillor Adam Giambrone, Ward 18, Davenport (TE.New.TE36.5.1) |
TE36.6 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 19 |
Final Report - 180 Shaw Street - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 23, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 180 Shaw Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 of the report dated July 23, 2010 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 180 Shaw Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report dated July 23, 2010 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to convert the existing, vacant public school at 180 Shaw Street into a centre for arts and community programming. The centre will be run by Artscape and will consist of non-profit arts and community use space.
The proposal is to convert a vacant school site to a centre for non-profit arts and community uses such as artist studios, galleries, offices for small non profit agencies and a small cafe. The site is located in an area identified as having the fifth highest concentration of artists in all of Canada, many of whom need dedicated space to create and sell their art. The proposed uses are low impact and will not significantly increase the demands on the site or surrounding Neighbourhood. Further, the number of people using the site will be significantly less than when the site was used as a public school.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.6 - Staff Report - 180 Shaw Street - Official Plan and Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32448.pdf) TE36.6 - Staff Report - 180 University Avenue - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32449.pdf) TE36.6 - Staff Report - 180 University Avenue - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32450.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 11, 2010) E-mail from Steven Heuchert (TE.Supp.TE36.6.1) |
TE36.7 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Refusal Report - 288A, 290 and 294 Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment Application |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 288A, 290 and 294 Adelaide Street West for the reasons set out in this report including:
a. the proposal represents over-development of the property;
b. the proposal is out of scale with the existing and planned built form context;
c. the proposal would create negative impacts on the public realm and adjacent and nearby properties affecting their use and enjoyment;
d. the proposal would set a negative precedent for future development undermining the vision for this area of the City;
e. the proposal promotes commuter and all day parking in the downtown contrary to the policies of the Official Plan;
f. the proposal is inconsistent with the King-Spadina Urban Design Guidelines and Criteria for the Review of Tall Buildings Proposals;
g. the proposal is inconsistent with the Provincial Policy Statement;
h. the proposal does not conform to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe; and
i. the proposal does not complement its heritage context or the warehouse character of the Adelaide Street and Richmond Street corridors.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning and other appropriate staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of City Council’s decision to refuse the application, in the event that the application is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.
3. City Council authorize City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Chief Planner, should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. It proposes a 37-storey mixed use building, 122.4 metres high, including mechanicals, at 288A, 290 and 294 Adelaide Street West. The proposed development includes 281 apartments, approximately 276 square metres of retail space, 1562 square metres of office space, an at grade loading space, an 86 space, 5 level commercial parking garage above grade, and 4 levels of residential parking underground with 160 parking spaces.
The proposal represents over-development of the property contrary to the planning framework for King-Spadina. The building height that exceeds the zoning by-law permissions by 87.4 metres is significantly out of scale with the existing and planned built form context and creates negative impacts on the public realm and abutting and nearby properties that affects their use and enjoyment. Its approval would set a negative precedent for future development that undermines the vision for this area of the City. It also includes a 5-level above-grade commercial parking garage that promotes the use of private automobiles over transit and gives priority to commuter and all-day parking in the downtown contrary to the objectives of the Official Plan. City Planning recommends that Council refuse the zoning by-law amendment application. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.7 - Staff Report - 288A, 290, 294 Adelaide West - Zoning Amendment - Refusal Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32451.pdf) |
TE36.8 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Final Report - 15-27 Beverley Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment, Demolition Application Under Municipal Code 667 |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
If City Council adopts the recommendations of the Toronto and East York Community Council to approve Applications: 09 133546 STE 20 OZ, 10 200430 STE 20 OZ and 10 205317 STE 00 RH for 15-27 Beverley Street, then Council should:
1. Amend the Official Plan for 15-27 Beverley Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, dated July 29, 2010.
2. Amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for 15-27 Beverley Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, dated July 29, 2010.
3. Authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. A Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan for residential tenants in the existing buildings to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in accordance with more detailed terms as set forth in the draft by-law attached as Attachment 6.
ii. A contribution in the amount of $770,000 for cash-in-lieu of replacement of the six (6) residential rental housing units existing on the lot at the time of the application to be paid to the City’s Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for the purpose of constructing new affordable housing units.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The owner shall provide a minimum of nine (9) residential units in the building having at least three bedrooms.
5. Approve the application to demolish the five (5) existing buildings that include 6 residential rental housing units located at 15-27 Beverley Street pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for payment of cash-in-lieu of replacement of the rental housing, and tenant relocation assistance:
a. the owner shall provide A Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan for residential tenants in the existing buildings to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in accordance with more detailed terms as set forth in the draft by-law attached as Attachment 6;
b. the owner shall pay to the City, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the sum of $770,000 for cash-in-lieu of replacement of the 6 residential rental housing units existing on the lot at the time of the application to be paid to the City’s Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for the purpose of constructing new affordable housing units; and
c. the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreements to secure the conditions outlined in a. and b. above and as described in Appendix 1 of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment (Attachment 6), to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
6. Authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for demolition of the six (6) rental housing units after the latest of the following has occurred: the satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 5; the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect; and the issuance of the site plan approval for the development by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
7. Authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 6 for the existing rental housing units.
8. Authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the existing rental housing units no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for the foundation of the new building, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 7 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:
a. the owner erect a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the date the permit is issued for demolition of the buildings;
b. should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The applicant proposes an 11-storey residential building at 15-27 Beverley Street. Townhouses with separate entrances are proposed along Beverley Street at the base of a 3-storey podium with a residential building above. Access for parking and loading is located off the public lane at the south side of the site. The proposal involves the demolition of existing buildings on the site, including all of the residential rental dwelling units, with no replacement rental housing to be provided. Two buildings listed on the City’s Inventory of Heritage Properties would also be demolished.
As directed by City Council at its meeting on July 6 and 7, 2010, this report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and approval of the application to demolish the existing residential buildings without requiring the replacement of the residential rental units. An application to demolish the listed heritage buildings on-site has been submitted to Heritage Preservation Services and is currently under review. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.8 - Staff Report - 15-27 Beverley Street - Official Plan and Zoning, Demolition Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32453.pdf) |
TE36.9 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Final Report - Western Part of 18 York Street, 0 Bremner Boulevard - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 168-93, as amended, for the former City of Toronto, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the July 20, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 16 of the City of Toronto Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. the owner shall pay for and construct improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the proposed development, as directed by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to add office use to the permitted use of the property located at the western part of 18 York Street (known as Block 7B, Railway Lands East, northeast corner of Lower Simcoe Street and Bremner Boulevard).
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit office uses on the lands in question. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.9 - Staff Report - Western Part of 18 York Street - 0 Bremner Boulevard - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32454.pdf) |
TE36.10 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Final Report - 277 Davenport Road - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for 277 Davenport Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report dated July 21, 2010, from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
Summary |
This application was submitted on May 16, 2008 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The application proposes the construction of a 6 storey mixed-use building at 277 Davenport Road. It will replace a vacant one storey commercial building. The proposed building consists of 9 dwelling units and 1 commercial unit as well as two levels of underground parking containing 24 parking spaces.
The City Planning Division is recommending approval of the proposed development based on it being substantially in compliance with the development criteria for Mixed Use Areas, Built Form and other Official Plan policies as well as urban design guidelines. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.10 - Staff Report - 277 Davenport Road - Rezoning - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32455.pdf) |
TE36.11 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Final Report - 355 King Street West, Part of 343 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(August 16, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for 355 King Street West, part of 343 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the August 16, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to execute an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor. Such agreement shall be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. An indexed cash contribution of $1,250,000.00 of which 10 per cent will be allocated to affordable housing in Ward 20, and the remainder for the provision of one of more of the following:
- capital improvements to non-profit arts and cultural facilities in Ward 20; - streetscape improvements to John Street and Mercer Street; - design development supporting the John Street streetscape project.
b. The indexed cash contribution is to be provided prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit.
c. Provision of a minimum of 900 sq.m. within the project for one or more non-profit arts, cultural, community or institutional facilities to be approved by the Executive Director, Cultural Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor or an appropriate alternate community benefit to be negotiated with City Planning staff and the Ward Councillor, acting reasonably, should the cultural space not be viable.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
d. Construction, provision and maintenance of a mid-block pedestrian connection through the project from Mercer Street to King Street West.
e. The owner shall provide a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the residential units in the building having at least three bedrooms.
f. Architectural plans, elevations and landscaping including 1:50 elevations will be secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the owner will be required to, in conjunction with each Site Plan Application submit 1:50 scale drawings in conformity with this requirement for the seven storey podium.
g. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
h. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, including shoring and excavation, the owner shall have obtained title to the land shown on Attachment 5 and labelled “Old Lane” and shall have conveyed to the City the land labelled as “New Lane”.
i. Provision of detailed design drawings showing drainage patterns from the public lane located on the east side of the site, locations of proposed catch basins, transitioning of grades along the centreline and limits of the laneway curb cut details on Mercer Street and all proposed underground utility relocations form the existing laneway to the proposed new laneway to the satisfaction of the City’s Executive Director of Technical Services prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site.
j. The owner shall be encouraged to build in conformity with the Green Development Standard Checklist on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director. City Planning Division, date-stamped June 3, 2009.
k. Submission of a wind study to be submitted as part of an application for Site Plan Approval for the property. The owner shall implement wind mitigation measures required by the wind study, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
l. The owner shall provide and maintain in good order and operation an irrigation system, at the owner’s expense, for proposed trees within the public road allowances, including an automatic timer, designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and constructed with a back flow preventer to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services.
m. Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall make alternative arrangements with respect to charter bus parking for the Princess of Wales Theatre in accordance with the Development Agreement between Ed Mirvish Enterprises Limited and the City of Toronto dated June 17, 1991.
4. Prior to the introduction of Bills, City Council shall require the applicant to withdraw the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board regarding Zoning By-laws 921-2006 and 922-2006 arising from the 2006 King-Spadina Secondary Plan Review.
5. City Council require the owner to obtain a heritage permit under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act prior to Site Plan Approval for the property at 355 King Street West.
6. City Council require the owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the retained portion of the heritage property at 355 King Street West prior to Site Plan Approval. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
An application has been made to amend Zoning By-law 438-86 of the former City of Toronto for the property at 355 King Street West, part of 343 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way. The proposal is to erect 42 and 47-storey condominium towers on a 7-storey podium building. The project proposes 661 residential units and 4,066 sq.m. of non-residential gross floor area. Four hundred and twenty parking spaces are proposed in 5 levels below grade. The project incorporates parts of the heritage designated Westinghouse Building at 355 King Street West and a mid block pedestrian connection from Mercer Street to King Street.
Contributions under Section 37 of the Planning Act will be secured including a space for a non-profit cultural use and $1.25 million towards affordable housing and streetscape improvements in the area.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.11 - Staff Report - 355 King Street West, 343 King W., 119 Blue Jays (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33150.pdf) TE36.11 - Notice of Pending Report - 355 King Street West, Part of 343 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way - Rezoning - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32463.pdf) |
TE36.12 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Refusal Report - 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(August 11, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West for the reasons set out in this report including:
a. the proposal represents over-development of the property; b. the proposal is out of scale with the existing and planned built form context; c. the proposal would create negative impacts on the public realm and adjacent and nearby properties affecting their use and enjoyment; d. the proposal would set a negative precedent for future development undermining the vision for this area of the City; e. the proposal is inconsistent with the King-Spadina Urban Design Guidelines and Criteria for the Review of Tall Buildings Proposals; f. the proposal is inconsistent with the Provincial Policy Statement; and g. the proposal does not conform to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of City Council’s decision to refuse the application, in the event that the application is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.
3. City Council authorize City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to secure services, facilities and matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Chief Planner, should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
An application has been made by McCarthy Tetrault LLP for the site at the southeast corner of Richmond and Peter Streets. The site currently contains two existing buildings: a three storey warehouse commercial building at 117 Peter Street and a two-to-three-storey wedge-shaped commercial building at 287 Richmond St W.
This application proposes a 36-storey mixed use building containing retail and office uses in a 4- storey podium occupying the majority of the site and a 32-storey residential tower above. The proposed development would contain 446 residential units and seeks an overall height of 124 metres including mechanical elements. Parking for vehicles and bicycles is proposed to be provided in five below-grade levels.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.12 - Staff Report - 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33134.pdf) TE36.12 - Notice of Pending Report - 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32709.pdf) |
TE36.13 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 22 |
Final Report - 1955 to 1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive and 18 to 22 Millwood Road - Official Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Rental Demolition Applications |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 23, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 3 Belsize Drive portion of the site at 1955-1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive and 18-22 Millwood Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the July 23, 2010 report of the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 as amended, for the lands at 1955-1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive and 18-22 Millwood Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the July 23, 2010 report of the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Bills in City Council, City Council require the owner of the lands at 1955-1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive and 18-22 Millwood Road (subject of this report) to enter into an Agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:
a. A payment of $435,000.00 of which $100,000.00 will be payable prior to the introduction of the Bills in City Council and the remaining $335,000.00 will be payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Such payment will be directed to the Planning Act Reserve Fund to be used for the construction and associated costs of the Neshama Accessible Playground at Oriole Park or for the purchase, design and construction of a new park on the lands south of the TTC bus barns at Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue West.
b. The provision and maintenance on the site of not less than 33 new replacement rental dwelling units, comprising 18 one-bedroom units and 14 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit which units shall generally be of the same type and size as in the buildings existing on the lot at the date of enactment of the by-law amendment, of which at least 27 shall have affordable rents and 6 shall have rents no higher than the mid-range rents, and tenant relocation assistance for tenants in the existing buildings in accordance with more detailed terms as set forth in the draft by-law attached as Attachment 10 to the final rezoning report from City Planning dated July 23, 2010.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
c. Incorporation in the construction of the building, exterior materials shown on 1:50 scale drawings, approved by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, submitted for the development’s Yonge Street, Belsize Drive and Millwood Road elevations as part of the Site Plan Approval process.
5. City Council require that before the issuance of any building permit, including foundation permit, the applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.
6. City Council require the owner to, as part of site plan approval, provide and maintain an irrigation system including an automatic timer for the proposed trees within the public road allowance to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
7. City Council require that before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the site servicing review submitted and date stamped on July 6, 2010 be reviewed and accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services.
8. City Council approve the application to demolish the 33 existing residential units located at 1955-1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive and 18-22 Millwood Road pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363, subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain thirty three (33) residential rental units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years, comprising 18 one-bedroom and 14 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit, of which at least 27 shall have affordable rents and 6 shall have rents no higher than mid-range rents;
b. the owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance including the right to return to a replacement rental unit for the eligible tenants to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and as further detailed in the draft by-law attached as Attachment 10 to the final rezoning report from City Planning dated July 23, 2010;
c. the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in a. above and as described in the draft zoning by-law amendment (refer to Attachment 10: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and
d. the owner shall enter into and register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act (to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor) agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 33 replacement rental units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or his designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands to be released only upon the owner obtaining the necessary approvals including the zoning by-law amendment.
9. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 8, and after the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments referred to in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect.
10. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 9.
11. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for the foundation of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 9, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:
a. the owner erect a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and
b. should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.
12. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 and Section 111 Agreements. |
Summary |
This application was made on December 28, 2006 and subsequently revised most recently on April 14, 2010 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan as it pertains to a portion of the site at 3 Belsize Drive and to amend the Zoning By-law for the entire site at 1955-1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive and 18-22 Millwood Road. These amendments and a permission to demolish the existing rental apartments on site would allow the construction of the proposed 8-storey mixed use building with retail at grade and 206 residential units including 33 rental replacement units.
The City Planning Division is recommending approval of the proposed development and the application for a permit to demolish the residential rental units under Municipal Code 667 based on its location on an Avenue and on its planning and design attributes which include:
a. the proposed residential units are comprised of a mix of tenures (condominium and rental apartment units) and a mix of unit sizes ranging from bachelor to 3 bedroom units;
b. the proposed development provides a transition in scale and density as it steps down from the Yonge Street mixed use corridor to the low density neighbourhood to the east;
c. the proposed development maintains adequate sunlight for residents in abutting neighbourhoods and at pedestrian level on Yonge Street;
d. the applicant’s Avenue Segment Review (as adopted by staff) indicates that incremental redevelopments of the same general scale (but as modified in the future by the Mid-Rise Performance Standards) within the identified Avenue Segment will not negatively impact the neighbourhood to the east;
e. the proposed new commercial bays on Yonge Street would provide updated retail and service space which would attract new commercial and employment activity to the area;
f. the inclusion of grade-related units on Belsize Drive assist in the integration of the proposed building into the neighbourhood to the east;
g. the site is within a block of the Davisville subway station and has excellent transit connections to most points within the City;
h. the site is on Yonge Street with close proximity to retail, service and entertainment facilities and places of employment; and
i. the Section 37 benefits that would be secured as a result of approval and construction of this development including; the replacement of all 33 existing rental apartment units with new rental units of equivalent size within the new building and funding for either or both the Neshama Accessible Playground at Oriole Park and the new park which is to be developed south of the TTC bus barns at Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue West. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.13 - Staff Report - 1955-1985 Yonge Street, 3 Belsize Drive, 18-22 Millwood Road - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32464.pdf) |
TE36.14 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 22 |
Final Report - 1994-2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 26, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 1994-2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the Staff Report dated July 26, 2010 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the introduction of Bills in City Council, City Council require the owner of the lands at 1994-2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:
a. A payment of $500,000, payable prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit. Such payment will be deposited to the Planning Act Reserve Fund. Up to $200,000 may be used for the beautification of the terminus of Glebe Road West, including streetscape improvements. The remainder of the funds are to be used for the construction and associated cost of the Neshama Accessible Playground at Oriole Park and/or for the purchase, design and construction of a new park on the lands south of the TTC bus barns at Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue West. The allocation of these funds will be at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of the City Planning Division in consultation with the local Ward Councillor.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
b. As part of the Site Plan Approval process, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale drawings for the first 3 floors of the Yonge Street and Glebe Road West elevations, with building materials labelled.
c. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
d. The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, as accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure is required to support this development.
4. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 Agreement. |
Summary |
This application was made on March 9, 2009 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to construct a 10-storey mixed-use building at 1994-2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West. The proposed building will step back above the 7th floor to create a 7-storey street-wall on Yonge Street and Glebe Road West. Retail is proposed on the ground floor along Yonge Street. The residential entrance and vehicular access will be off Glebe Road West. The proposal calls for 165 residential units, and 185 vehicular parking spaces located in three levels of underground parking.
The proposed development has been found to be substantially in compliance with the development criteria for Mixed Use Areas, Avenues, Public Realm, Built Form, and all other relevant Official Plan policies and urban design guidelines. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.14 - Staff Report - 1994-2008 Yonge Street, 17 Glebe Road West - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32465.pdf) |
TE36.15 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 27 |
Final Report - 1000 Bay Street - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(August 10, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended for the former City of Toronto substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to permit the development of 1000 Bay Street as noted in the staff report dated August 10, 2010 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required to give effect to the intent of the recommendations contained in this report.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 1000 Bay Street to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:
a. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade permit, pay to the City the sum of $1,500,000 consisting of $500,000 towards the upgrade of Queen’s Park and $1,000,000 towards Public Art for the Gateway Feature on St. Joseph Street and the narrowing of the roadway of St. Joseph Street.
b. Require that the cash amounts identified in a. above shall be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
c. Provide 1:50 scale drawings for the St. Joseph Street, Bay Street and west facing elevations of the three-storey podium and two floors above with building materials labelled.
d. Incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
e. Build in conformity with the Toronto Green Standard Checklist received by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on February 4, 2010.
f. Enter into a Site Plan Agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, under Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
g. Prior to final Site Plan approval the owner shall:
1. Retain a consultant archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Culture under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended), to carry out a Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the entire development property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the 2009 Final Draft - Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, Ministry of Culture. Should the archaeological assessment process continue beyond a Stage 1 assessment, any recommendations for Stages 2- 4 mitigation strategies must be reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services prior to commencement of the site mitigation.
2. Submit a copy of the relevant assessment report(s) to the Heritage Preservation Services Unit in both hard copy format and as an Acrobat PDF file on compact disk.
3. Incorporate significant archaeological resources and findings into the proposed development through either in-situ preservation and interpretation where feasible, or commemorate and interpret the resources through exhibition development on site including, but not limited to, commemorative plaquing.
4. Submit to the Executive Director of Technical Services for review and acceptance, a site servicing review to demonstrate how this site will be serviced and whether the existing municipal infrastructure is adequate.
4. City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above-noted recommendations. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after December 23, 2009 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This is an application to amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, to permit a mixed-use development of 32 storeys consisting of 13 storeys for a hotel and 19 storeys for a residential condominium at 1000 Bay Street.
The proposed gross floor area of the building is 13,373 square metres including 39.5 square metres of ground floor retail resulting in a density of 11.6 times the area of the lot. The development would include 99 residential units and 115 hotel units and is proposed to be approximately 102.0 metres in height to the top of the mechanical penthouse.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.15 - Revised Staff Report - 1000 Bay Street - Rezoning Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33014.pdf) TE36.15 - Notice of Pending Report - 1000 Bay Street - Rezoning Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32466.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 12, 2010) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, Solicitors for MTCC 876 (TE.New.TE36.15.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Terry Morrison, President, MTCC 561 (TE.New.TE36.15.2) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Ann Boyd and Dennis Lenzin (TE.New.TE36.15.3) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Kathyrn A. Holden (TE.New.TE36.15.4) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from John Holden, Queen's Park Place (TE.New.TE36.15.5) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Carol Westcott (TE.New.TE36.15.6) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from G. J. Matteo (TE.New.TE36.15.7) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Ann Foster (TE.New.TE36.15.8) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Douglas and Kate Thomas (TE.New.TE36.15.9) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Mary Wilson (TE.New.TE36.15.10) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Yu-Mei Li Teofilovici (TE.New.TE36.15.11) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Marguerite Matteo (TE.New.TE36.15.12) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Louis and Donalda Badone (TE.New.TE36.15.13) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Dolores and Jim Ramsay (TE.New.TE36.15.14) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Genevieve Price (TE.New.TE36.15.15) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Renee Bozowsky (TE.New.TE36.15.16) |
TE36.16 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 27 |
Final Report - 15 Huntley Street - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the July 20, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the July 20, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment as may be required to give effect to the intent of the recommendations contained in this report.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit for 15 Huntley Street following issuance of the first below-grade building permit for the proposed building.
5. City Council require the owner to enter into a Site Plan agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, under Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 addressing the following:
Prior to final Site Plan approval, the owner shall:
a. provide 1:50 scale drawings for the Isabella Street and Huntley Street elevations of the 4-storey building with building materials labelled;
b. incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;
c. build in conformity with the Toronto Green Standard Checklist received by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on June 2, 2009;
d. be advised that no soil disturbance activity is to take place until the Ministry of Tourism and Culture accepts the Archaeological Report and is satisfied that no further archaeological work is required. The following advisory comments are to be attached to the Site Plan agreement:
i. in the event that deeply buried archaeological remains are encountered on the property during construction activities, the Heritage Operations Unit of the Ministry of Culture be notified immediately at (416) 314-7146 as well as the City of Toronto, Heritage Preservation Services Unit (416) 338-1096; and
ii. in the event that human remains are encountered during construction, the proponent should immediately contact both the Ministry of Culture, and the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of Cemeteries at the Cemeteries Regulation Unit, Ministry of Government Services, and (416) 326-8404;
e. submit to the Executive Director of Technical Services for review and acceptance, a site servicing review to demonstrate how this site will be serviced and whether the existing municipal infrastructure is adequate; and
f. pay for any upgrades to the municipal infrastructure identified through the review of the site servicing review required to support the development, as determined by and to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services.
6. City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above-noted recommendations. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application by the Elementary Teacher’s Federation of Ontario is for the demolition of a 2-storey office building and development of a 4-storey office building with a height of 17.8 metres (20.3 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse). The office building would have a gross floor area of approximately 7753 square metres and provide a total of 50 parking spaces, one Type B loading space and 22 weather protected bicycle parking spaces located at-grade and within an underground garage. Both the pedestrian entrance and vehicular access to the site would be from Isabella Street.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
The proposal has been reviewed and determined to be compatible with its physical context and will not affect nearby Neighbourhoods or Apartment Neighbourhoods in a manner contrary to the Neighbourhoods protection policies of the Official Plan. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.16 - Staff Report - 15 Huntley Street - Official Plan and Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32467.pdf) |
TE36.17 | ACTION |
10:00 AM |
|
Ward: 27 |
Final Report - 203 Jarvis Street - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 22, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the July 22, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 203 Jarvis Street to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:
a. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade permit, pay to the City the sum of $800,000 towards streetscape improvements on Jarvis Street.
b. Require that the cash amounts identified in a. above shall be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
c. Build in conformity with the Toronto Green Standard Checklist submitted by the applicant on March 31, 2008, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning.
d. The owner shall prepare all documents and convey to the City, for nominal consideration, a 1.67 metre wide strip of land to the full extent of the site abutting the west limit of the north-south public lane, to a minimum depth of 0.5 metres from finished grade, such lands to be free and clear of all physical and title encumbrances, in fee simple for lane widening purposes and subject to a right-of-way for access purposes in favour of the Grantor until such time as said lands have been laid out and dedicated as a public highway, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services.
e. As part of the Site Plan Approval process, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale drawings for the elevations along Jarvis Street and Shuter Street of the podium and two floors above, with building materials labelled.
f. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
g. The owner shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
Summary |
This application was made on February 12, 2008 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to redevelop the existing commercial surface parking lot at 203 Jarvis Street with a 20-storey hotel containing 261 guest rooms with a proposed building height of 61 metres (66 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a gross floor area of 14,702 square metres. The applicant proposes 69 vehicle parking spaces within three levels of underground parking accessed via a car elevator. The hotel would include limited grade-related retail such as a coffee shop or convenience store for public use with a total area of approximately 104 square metres.
The proposal is an appropriate development for the property as it provides for commercial development of an underutilized lot within the downtown. The site is a corner property with frontage on both Jarvis Street and Shuter Street. There is already a mix of commercial and residential land uses along Jarvis Street and the proposed hotel is an appropriate and compatible land use.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.17 - Staff Report - 203 Jarvis Street - Rezoning Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32468.pdf) |
TE36.18 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 28 |
Final Report - 591 Dundas Street East - Regent Park Phase 2 - Application to Remove the Holding Symbol (h) from the Zoning By-law and Application for Residential Demolition |
Origin |
(July 16, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 of the former City of Toronto, as amended to remove the Holding Symbol (“h”) from certain lands in the Regent Park redevelopment (Phase 2) in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached to the July 16, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as Attachment No. 7.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylist and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.
3. City Council adopt the Regent Park - Phase 2 - Development Context Plan, dated May 7, 2010, distributed to members of Toronto and East York Community Council and is on file with the City Clerk and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as an update to the Regent Park Urban Design Guidelines.
4. City Council require that Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) tender and award the contract(s) for the construction of the public roads, sewers, and watermains in Phase 2 in accordance with the requirements of the Executive Director, Technical Services, in consultation with the Director of Purchasing and Materials Management, and that such requirements be secured in the Subdivision Agreement between the City and TCHC.
5. City Council authorize reimbursement by the City to TCHC for a portion of the costs of constructing the public roads, sewers, and watermains in Phase 2, be subject to terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Technical Services, and that such terms and conditions be secured in the Subdivision Agreement between the City and TCHC.
6. City Council approve the application to demolish the subject residential building(s) with the following conditions, notwithstanding that there is no building permit for a replacement buildings on the sites:
a. the removal, disposal and handling of all hazardous materials including, but not limited to asbestos, benzene, lead, silica, mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls shall be conducted in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Labour regulations and guidelines;
b. the removal and disposal of above ground storage tanks shall be in accordance with Ministry of Labour, Ministry of the Environment and the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) regulations and guidelines;
c. any perched groundwater encountered shall be tested to ensure that it meets Toronto Sewer By-law criteria prior to discharge into the sewer system. Any groundwater not meeting criteria shall be stored in an appropriate holding tank for off-site disposal in accordance with Ministry of the Environment regulations and guidelines;
d. the owner shall ensure the implementation of the demolition and excavation dust control measures approved by the Medical Officer of Health;
e. prior to initiating any demolition activities, the owner shall notify Toronto Public Health (416-338-8062) of the date the demolition is scheduled to commence;
f. all debris and rubble shall be removed from the site immediately after demolition;
g. any holes on the property shall be back-filled with clean fill; and
h. the owner shall not commence demolition related activities if it will impact privately owned trees protected under Municipal Code, Chapter 813, Trees, Article III unless the trees have been authorized for removal or tree protection measures have been put in place in accordance with the City of Toronto’s “Tree Protection Policy and Specifications for Construction Near Trees.”
7. City Council advise the applicant that:
a. registration of the Plan of Subdivision of Regent Park for Phase 2 cannot occur until such time as the Owner has satisfied the applicable conditions, as may be revised, of draft Plan of Subdivision Approval issued on May 31, 2005;
b. TCHC should meet with City staff as soon as possible to present an assessment of how the remaining replacement social housing units and especially the large-family units are expected to be accommodated on-site over the remaining phases of the revitalization;
c. for the purposes of replacing existing social housing units suitable for families in Regent Park or other planned social housing revitalization initiatives, interior spaces in housing units with no exterior windows will not be counted as bedrooms by the City for purposes of categorizing the replacement unit types by bedroom type;
d. the redevelopment of the site may require that all soil and groundwater contaminants be removed to background levels for the intended land use;
e. a Notice of Project must be filed with the Ontario Ministry of Labour, as required;
f. in the event that deeply buried archaeological remains are encountered on the property during the construction activities, the consultant archaeologist and the Central East Archaeology Review Officer in the Culture Programs Unit of the Ministry of Culture should be notified immediately. A licensed archaeologist must be present should material such as cut stone, brick rubble, mortar, stone footings, wood and associated artefacts be encountered. In such cases, stoppage of the construction work will be required for as long as the archaeologist deems necessary in order to evaluate the significance of any such archaeological remains and to develop an appropriate mitigation strategy; and
g. furthermore in the event that human remains are encountered during construction the proponent should immediately contact the consultant archaeologist, the Central East Archaeology Review Officer in the Culture Programs Unit of the Ministry of Culture and the Registrar of Cemeteries at the Policy & Consumer Protection Service Division of the Ministry of Consumer and Business Services (416-326-8404). |
Summary |
This application proposes to remove the Holding Symbol (h) from the Zoning By-law for Phase 2 lands in Regent Park. Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) has also applied to demolish 347 existing residential rental units for Phase 2. As part of the Council approved revitalization of Regent Park all of the existing social housing units to be demolished will be replaced and tenants are to receive assistance with relocation.
The application is consistent with the previous planning approvals for Regent Park redevelopment and is part of the implementation of several important City building initiatives including a community park, a community centre and an arts and cultural centre in addition to new market housing and new TCHC rental replacement housing.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to remove the Holding Symbol (h) from the Zoning By-law for Phase 2 of the Regent Park redevelopment and permit the demolition 347 social housing units. |
Financial Impact |
In autumn 2008, the City and TCHC structured a cost-sharing mechanism for the delivery of hard infrastructure within the Regent Park redevelopment area. This was achieved via the adoption of the 2009 Capital Budget and 2010-2018 Capital Plan and Forecast by Council which included funding for the identified infrastructure and community facilities for the full redevelopment of Regent Park within the relevant City divisions' budgets.
Phase 2 of the Regent Park redevelopment contains a significant portion of the total hard infrastructure and community facilities required for the entire project. Costs of these capital projects, including the City's 60% share of hard infrastructure for Phase 2, total $45.4 million. Overall, City funding for all phases is estimated at $62.6 million. The updated costs will be included for Council's consideration in the 2011 Capital Budget and 2012-2020 Capital Plan. Some community infrastructure projects, in Children's Services and Parks, Forestry and Recreation have been approved in prior year capital budgets, with work currently proceeding.
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and concurs with the Financial Impact Statement. |
Background Information |
TE36.18 - Staff Report - 591 Dundas Street East - Regent Park Phase 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32469.pdf) |
TE36.19 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 28, 30 |
Final Report - Lower Don Lands Official Plan Amendments and Keating Channel Precinct West Zoning By-Law |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(August 11, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council approve the draft amendment to the former City of Toronto Official Plan and Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - OPA 388 for the Lower Don Lands (Attachment No. 1), the draft amendment to the former City of Toronto Official Plan - OPA 389 (Attachment No. 2) and the draft amendment to Zoning By-law 438-86 for the former City of Toronto (Attachment No. 3). Attachments 1 to 3 inclusive are attachments to the August 11, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council direct staff to take the necessary actions to implement the Official Plan amendments and Zoning By-law amendment through modifications at the on-going Ontario Municipal Board hearing on the Central Waterfront Plan as appropriate.
3. City Council direct staff to report back to City Council on the appropriate actions to protect for the relocation for the mouth of the Don River.
4. City Council direct staff to submit the Official Plan amendments to the Province for approval.
5. City Council direct staff to make any modifications to the Official Plan Amendments that the Chief Planner may deem appropriate to address matters arising from provincial review.
6. City Council endorse the Affordable Housing Delivery Strategy for Keating West Precinct in Attachment 4, and direct staff to continue discussions with Waterfront Toronto to resolve any outstanding concerns with respect to the Strategy and, if necessary, report back in January 2011 on the outcome of those discussions. |
Summary |
This report reviews and recommends approval of a City-initiated proposal to amend the former City of Toronto Official Plan and Central Waterfront Secondary Plan for the Lower Don Lands and approve an amendment to By-law 438-86 for the Keating Channel Precinct West. The Keating Channel Precinct West are the lands south of the Rail Corridor between Small Street on the west, Cherry Street on the east and the Keating Channel on the South. This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.19 - Staff Report - Lower Don Lands Official Plan Amendments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33144.pdf) TE36.19 - Notice of Pending Report - Lower Don Lands Official Plan Amendments - Keating Channel (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32470.pdf) |
TE36.20 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 28 |
West Don Lands, Phase 2 - Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and the Lifting of the "h" Holding Symbol |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Report from the Director, City Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former City of Toronto Official Plan for the lands known as The West Don Lands, Phase 2, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment in Attachment No. 7 to the July 29, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the former City of Toronto substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachment Nos. 8 and 9, to the July 29, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Official Plan Amendment and the draft Zoning By-laws as may be required to give effect to the recommendations in this report.
4. City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary Bill by the City Solicitor for enactment by City Council immediately upon finalization of the requirements set out in Section 4(c) of draft Zoning By-law attached as Attachment No. 8 to the July 29, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, respecting the removal of the holding (“h”) symbol.
5. City Council be advised that the Chief Planner, and Executive Director of Planning who has been delegated authority to approve draft plans of subdivision, proposes to approve the draft plan of subdivision generally outlined on Attachment 1 subject to:
i. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 13 to the July 29, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which as except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and
ii. such revisions to the proposed plan of subdivision or additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of the development.
6. City Council grant the City Clerk authority to sign the final plan of subdivision as the City is an owner of land in the West Don Lands.
7. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to the recommendations in this report respecting the proposal that includes the City of Toronto lands. |
Summary |
These applications were made on or after January 1, 2007 and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The applications propose to permit the redevelopment of the West Don Lands Phase 2 lands (shown on the map below) for a range of residential, institutional, industrial, commercial, and open space uses.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and to remove the holding symbol “h”.
It also recommends that the amending by-law for the removal of the holding symbol “h” be brought forward to Council for enactment when the conditions for the removal of the “h” have been fulfilled.
This report also advises that the Chief Planner may approve the draft plan of subdivision. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.20 - Staff Report - West Don Lands - Phase 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33146.pdf) TE36.20 - Notice of Pending Report - West Don Lands Phase 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32471.pdf) |
TE36.21 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 28 |
Final Report - Part of 5-7 The Esplanade - Official Plan and Rezoning Applications - Final Report |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the July 28, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the former City of Toronto, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the July 28, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, OPA 389 shall be adopted by City Council and be in-force.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following benefits:
a. prior to the issuance of above grade permits, provide a cash contribution of $1,500,000.00, which is to be used for the following:
i. $1,000,000.00 for PATH connections including, a pedestrian bridge over Yonge Street and a bridge to 2 Church Street, and/or the future signalization of Yonge Street and The Esplanade;
ii. $250,000.00 for streetscape improvements within the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood;
iii. $50,000.00 for the North St. Lawrence Market redevelopment;
iv. $100,000.00 for implementation of the Sherbourne Promenade Plan; and
v. $100,000.00 for implementation of the Heritage Interpretation and Old Town Toronto Heritage Lighting Plans;
b. require that the cash amounts identified in “a.” above shall be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City;
c. provide and maintain public works pursuant to a Percent for Public Art Program to be located on publicly accessible portions of the site to a value not less than one percent of the gross construction costs of all buildings and structures to be erected on the site.
The following matters are to be secured as a legal convenience in the Section 37 Agreement:
d. provide and maintain within the site a publicly accessible PATH walkway connection located within the podium from the west end of the podium adjacent to Yonge Street through the podium at the second level to the east end of the podium adjacent to the Toronto Parking Authority garage, generally as shown on the 2nd Floor Plan, drawing A3.2, prepared by Page + Steele Architects Planners and date stamped by the City Planning Division on December 19, 2009, which shall:
i. remain open and accessible to the public between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., 365 days a year;
ii. be satisfactorily illuminated; and
iii. enter into a Wayfinding Agreement and Easement Agreement;
e. provide and maintain within the site a publicly accessible PATH walkway connection from the second level within the podium from the west end of the podium down to the ground floor providing access to the street, generally as shown on the 2nd Floor Plan drawing A-3.2 and Ground Floor Plan, drawing A-3.1, prepared by Page + Steele Architects Planners and date stamped by the City Planning Division on December 19, which shall:
i. remain open and accessible to the public between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., 365 days a year;
ii. be satisfactorily illuminated; and
iii enter into a Wayfinding Agreement and Easement Agreement;
f. provide knock-out panels along the second floor portion of the podium at the western most edge adjacent to Yonge Street and the eastern most edge adjacent to the Toronto Parking Authority lot to accommodate a potential future connection to the PATH system, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the General Manager of Economic Development;
g. provide and maintain within the site publicly accessible Public Exhibition Space in conjunction with the PATH walkway connection located within the western edge of the podium on the second floor and ground floor, generally as shown on the 2nd Floor Plan drawing A-3.2 and Ground Floor Plan, drawing A-3.1, prepared by Page + Steele Architects Planners and date stamped by the City Planning Division on December 19, which shall:
i. remain open and accessible to the public between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., 365 days a year;
ii. be satisfactorily illuminated; and
iii. enter into a Wayfinding Agreement and Easement Agreement;
h. pay all costs associated with the PATH connection through the podium and the construction and maintenance of the Public Exhibition Space;
i. as part of the Site Plan Approval process, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale drawings for the podium along The Esplanade, Yonge Street and east elevation adjacent to 25 The Esplanade with building materials labelled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director;
j. the owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director;
k. be required to build in conformity with the Toronto Green Standard Checklist as submitted by the applicant and date stamped received by January 6, 2009; and
l. enter into a Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act. |
Summary |
This application was made on November 20, 2008 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes the development of a 32-storey residential tower on top of a 4-storey mixed-use podium for a total of 36-storeys and 271 dwelling units. The building height would be 112 metres and 118 metres to mechanical penthouse.
The 4-storey podium incorporates 4 levels of above grade parking for residents of the residential tower component at 5-7 the Esplanade. Previous approvals granted 6 levels of underground parking for the residents of the “L-Tower” residential condominium at 1 Front Street East (now 8 The Esplanade). A total of 523 parking spaces will be provided on site with 373 of those for use by the adjacent building proposed at 1 Front Street East (now 8 The Esplanade). The parking area would be accessed from The Esplanade, at the east end of the site abutting an existing driveway serving 2 Church Street, which is a Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) garage.
The floor space index for the residential and mixed-use component of this project, inclusive of the above grade parking podium, is approximately 11 times the area of the lot.
The proposed Official Plan and Rezoning applications are appropriate for the development of this site as it provides for residential mixed-use development on an underutilized site combining a surface parking lot with surplus lands formerly owned by GO Transit. The site is within the downtown core along Yonge Street and abutting the Financial District, and near Union Station and the Yonge/University subway line. There is already a mix of commercial and residential land uses along The Esplanade and the proposed 36-storey development is an appropriate and compatible land use.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.21 - Staff Report - Part of 5-7 The Esplanade - Official Plan and Rezoning Applications - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32622.pdf) TE36.21 - Revised Map 1 - 5-7 The Esplanade (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33119.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 10, 2010) E-mail from Al Smith, Executive Director, St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA (TE.New.TE36.21.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Andrea M. Garcia, Toronto Cyclists Union (TE.New.TE36.21.2) |
TE36.22 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 28 |
North St. James Town Planning Framework Study - Request for Direction Report |
Origin |
(August 6, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the North St. James Town Planning Framework Objectives for the lands located in the area bounded by Howard Street, Sherbourne Street and Bloor Street East and Parliament Street, attached to the August 6, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as Attachment 9.
2. City Council direct staff to implement the Planning Framework when reviewing, analyzing and formulating recommendations on future development applications for properties in the area bounded by Howard Street, Sherbourne Street and Bloor Street East and Parliament Street. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide recommendations for the North St. James Town Planning Framework. The purpose of the study is to assess whether existing planning controls are appropriate and permit desirable development in the North St. James Town area, as well as identify area public realm objectives. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.22 - Staff Report - North St. James Town Planning Framework Study - Direction Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33027.pdf) TE36.22 - Notice of Pending Report - North St. James Town Planning Framework Study (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32473.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 16, 2010) E-mail from Kim Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP (TE.New.TE36.22.1) |
TE36.23 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 29 |
Final Report - 272, 274 and 280 Donlands Avenue - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 23, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former Borough of East York Zoning By-law 6752, for the lands at 272, 274 and 280 Donlands Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report dated July 23, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the owner to pay for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, as accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that upgrades to such infrastructure is required to support this development. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to construct a new 12-storey, 105 unit, mixed-use building at 272, 274 and 280 Donlands Avenue. The application has been revised since April 2010, and no longer includes the properties located at 243 and 249 Cosburn Avenue.
The proposal will have an overall gross floor area of 9,189 m2, a floor space index of 6.6 times the lot area, and an overall building height of 36 metres. The proposal will provide 210 m2 of indoor amenity space and 210 m2 of outdoor amenity space with approximately 560 m2 of the ground floor area to be allocated for WoodGreen office space.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the former Borough of East York Zoning By-law 6752, as amended. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.23 - Staff Report - 272, 274 and 280 Donlands Avenue - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32474.pdf) |
TE36.24 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 29 |
Request for Direction Report - 2 True Davidson Drive - Official Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Plan Control Applications |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the draft Official Plan Amendment and the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachments 4 and 5 respectively to the July 29, 2010 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold any order approving the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments until such time as the City advises that the conveyances to the City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority have been completed in accordance with the applicable Subdivision Agreement, as amended and that outstanding subdivision matters have been addressed.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to authorize technical and stylistic changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and the draft Zoning Amendment being supported as well as other modifications considered appropriate and consistent with the objectives outlined in this report with respect to the proposed designations and implementation of the applicable Toronto Official Plan policies.
4. City Council authorize staff to continue with efforts to resolve any outstanding issues related to requirements of Technical Services as well as Toronto Region Conservation Authority and report directly to Council to its August 2010 meeting, if necessary, to obtain revised direction prior to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing. |
Summary |
This application seeks amendments to the Official Plan and the former East York Zoning By-law 6752, as amended, to permit the construction of a two and a half-storey single-family dwelling at 2 True Davidson Drive. The applicant is the owner of a block within the Governor’s Bridge subdivision (Block 63). The proposed amendments relate to a subject site within the block that will be created as a remnant parcel once certain land conveyances to the City and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority are completed pursuant to an applicable Subdivision Agreement. The subject site is located outside of the original zoning amendment area applicable to the lots within the plan of subdivision for the Governor’s Bridge area.
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council’s failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. The Site Plan application has also been appealed. A one week OMB hearing has been scheduled for the week of October 25, 2010.
This report seeks Council’s direction with respect to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments given that a Final Report was never submitted. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.24 - Staff Report - 2 True Davidson Drive - Request for Directions Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32475.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 16, 2010) E-mail from Brian Olds (TE.New.TE36.24.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Najma Ahmed (TE.New.TE36.24.2) (August 16, 2010) Fax from Tanya Luder and Keith Luder (TE.New.TE36.24.3) (August 16, 2010) Fax from Fred Gillespie (TE.New.TE36.24.4) (August 16, 2010) Fax from Leonard H. Kunka and Arie Leventakis (TE.New.TE36.24.5) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Kevin Chang (TE.New.TE36.24.6) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Hung-Hay Lau and Fu-Mei Lau (TE.New.TE36.24.7) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Jessica Chang (TE.New.TE36.24.8) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Donna Hayes and Brad Martin (TE.New.TE36.24.9) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Elias Mulamoottil (TE.New.TE36.24.10) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Julie Look and Louie Lee (TE.New.TE36.24.11) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Heather Phelps and Tony Potestio (TE.New.TE36.24.12) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Sony Sierra and Onkar Singh (TE.New.TE36.24.13) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Vandana Puranik and Vas Pachapurkar (TE.New.TE36.24.14) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Helen Chu (TE.New.TE36.24.15) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Ian Vernon (TE.New.TE36.24.16) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from David and Traci Temple (TE.New.TE36.24.17) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Harry F. Steinmetz (TE.New.TE36.24.18) |
TE36.25 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 32 |
Final Report - 2055 and 2057 Danforth Avenue - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(June 23, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 2055 and 2057 Danforth Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8, to the July 23, 2010 report of the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, prior to the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Approval, to secure the following:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. the owner shall make a cash payment to the City in the amount of $100,000 for conversion of the existing wading pool located in East Lynn Park to a splash pad, such payment to be made prior to execution of the Section 37 agreement or December 31, 2010, whichever occurs first;
ii. the owner shall make a cash payment to the City in the amount of $100,000 for conversion of the existing wading pool located in Stephenson Park to a splash pad, such payment to be made prior to execution of the Section 37 agreement or December 31, 2010, whichever occurs first; and
iii. the owner shall make a cash payment to the City in the amount of $100,000 towards the redevelopment of the Moncur Playground, such payment to be made prior to execution of the section 37 agreement or December 31, 2009, whichever occurs first.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. as part of the Site Plan Approval process, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale drawings for the first 5 storeys of the north and south elevations of the building with building materials labelled;
ii. the owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;
iii. the owner shall develop and implement a Construction Mitigation Plan and Communication Strategy, approved by the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, prior to the issuance of the first building permit (including excavation permit);
iv. the owner shall agree to provide and maintain an irrigation system for the proposed trees within the public road allowances, including an automatic timer designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and construct with backflow preventer to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation; and
v. the owner shall agree to provide any necessary improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing review, if it is determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the site servicing review accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a 12 storey mixed-use building at 2055 and 2057 Danforth Avenue with retail uses at grade, 148 residential units and 2 levels of below grade parking accessed off of Woodbine Avenue.
The City Planning Division is recommending approval of the proposed development based on its location on an Avenue and on its planning and design attributes which include:
a. the proposed development provides a transition in scale and density as it steps down from the Danforth Avenue mixed use corridor to the low density neighbourhood;
b. the proposed development maintains adequate sunlight for residents in abutting neighbourhoods and at pedestrian level on Danforth Avenue;
c. the applicant’s Avenue Segment Review (as adopted by staff) indicates that incremental redevelopments of the same general scale (but as modified in the future by the Mid-Rise Performance Standards) within the identified Avenue Segment will not negatively impact the adjacent neighbourhoods;
d. the site is within a block of the Woodbine subway station and has excellent transit connections to most points within the City;
e. the site is on Danforth Avenue with close proximity to retail, service and entertainment facilities and places of employment; and
f. the Section 37 benefits that would be secured as a result of approval and construction of this development including contributions towards 3 parks in the vicinity of the proposed development.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.25 - Staff Report - 2055 and 2057 Danforth Avenue - Rezoning (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32476.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 3, 2010) E-mail from Patricia Quinlan and Richard van Steenburgh (TE.Main.TE36.25.1) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from CY Zhang and Bao Qun Ou (TE.New.TE36.25.2) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from Elizabeth Yamashita (TE.New.TE36.25.3) (August 13, 2010) E-mail from Matt Lightstone (TE.New.TE36.25.4) (August 15, 2010) E-mail from Diana Gonzalez, East Lynn Farmers' Market (TE.New.TE36.25.5) (August 14, 2010) E-mail from Brian Ou (TE.New.TE36.25.6) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Cheryl Britton and Don Chapman (TE.New.TE36.25.7) |
TE36.26 | ACTION |
1:30 PM |
|
Ward: 32 |
Final Report - 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6, to the July 21, 2010 report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a four-storey apartment building with 65 units at 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue, with underground parking for 58 vehicles and 8 parking spaces for visitors off of the rear laneway.
The proposed apartment building is a use permitted on this property by both the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan. The building covers less than 50% of the lot area and with the placement of the majority of the parking underground, provides for a substantial amount of private a shared landscaped open space. The setbacks proposed protect for adequate privacy and light. The development is appropriate for this location.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.26 - Staff Report - 66 to 76 Kippendavie Avenue - Rezoning Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32477.pdf) |
Communications |
(May 11, 2010) E-mail from John Dowding (TE.Main.TE36.26.1) (May 11, 2010) E-mail from Ronald Gold (TE.Main.TE36.26.2) (May 12, 2010) E-mail from Gwen Fogel (TE.Main.TE36.26.3) (May 12, 2010) E-mail from E. A. Chippindale (TE.Main.TE36.26.4) (May 13, 2010) E-mail from Fawn Fairfoul (TE.Main.TE36.26.5) (May 13, 2010) E-mail from Lida Noble (TE.Main.TE36.26.6) (June 2, 2010) E-mail from Stephen Frank, Chair, Kew Beach Neighbourhood Association (TE.Main.TE36.26.7) (July 29, 2010) E-mail from Gord Holtam (TE.Main.TE36.26.8) (July 30, 2010) E-mail from Donna Macdiarmid (TE.Main.TE36.26.9) (July 30, 2010) E-mail from L. S. Gregory (TE.Main.TE36.26.10) (August 8, 2010) Letter from Walter Stelmach (TE.New.TE36.26.11) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Christie Friesen (TE.New.TE36.26.12) |
26a | Supplementary Report - 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue - Private Tree Removal |
Origin |
(August 10, 2010) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
Recommendations |
The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that:
1. City Council authorize Urban Forestry to issue a permit for the removal of one privately-owned tree at 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue. |
Summary |
The report requests that City Council authorize Urban Forestry to issue a permit for the destruction of a privately-owned tree located at 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue. The applicant has requested permission to remove the tree to accommodate the construction of a new, 4-storey, 65 unit, residential condominium building.
The tree in question is a Norway spruce tree (Picea abies), measuring 56 cm in diameter. The tree is currently in good and maintainable condition. The tree is however, situated such that it is within the allowable building footprint and direct conflict with the proposed construction. Therefore, the tree will have to be removed if this project is to proceed as planned. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.26a - Staff Report - 66-76 Kippendavie Avenue - Private Tree Removal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33019.pdf) |
TE36.27 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 32 |
Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District |
Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990 |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council repeal By-law 587-2010 being a by-law to designate the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District and adopt the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District Plan.
2. City Council designate by by-law the area shown on Attachment No. 1 as the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. City Council adopt by by-law the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District Plan, dated June 5, 2009, as the District Plan for the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District, for use by property owners, City staff, advisory committees and City Council when making decisions regarding matters set out under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are any objections to the by-law under Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Solicitor to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the by-law.
5. Until such time as the new by-law designating the area as the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District comes into force or is repealed, City Council direct that all properties within the proposed Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District, be listed on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties, unless already designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
6. City Council direct that the height limit and minimum lot frontages in the zoning by-law be reviewed and amended as necessary to more closely match the guidelines in the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District Plan. |
Summary |
Due to a previous error of notification, this report recommends that City Council repeal the existing By-law 587-2010 and designate anew the Kingswood Road South area as a Heritage Conservation District and recommend the adoption of the District Plan by by-law, as required under the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The District Plan was prepared by E.R.A. Architects and was community led. Heritage Preservation Staff (HPS) have reviewed the Plan and believe the Plan meets the requirements of the OHA. |
Background Information |
TE36.27 - Staff Report - Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32478.pdf) TE36.27 - Staff Report - Kingswood Rd South Heritage Conservation District - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32479.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 10, 2010) E-mail from Chantelle Courtney (TE.New.TE36.27.1) |
27a | Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council repeal By-law 587-2010 being a by-law to designate the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District and adopt the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District Plan.
2. City Council designate by by-law the area shown on Attachment 1 as the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. City Council adopt by by-law the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District Plan, dated June 5, 2009, as the District Plan for the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District, for use by property owners, City staff, advisory committees and City Council when making decisions regarding matters set out under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are any objections to the by-law under Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Solicitor to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the by-law.
5. Until such time as the new by-law designating the area as the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District comes into force or is repealed, City Council direct that all properties within the proposed Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District, be listed on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties, unless already designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
6. City Council direct that the height limit and minimum lot frontages in the zoning by-law be reviewed and amended as necessary to more closely match the guidelines in the Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District Plan. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the report (July 15, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District. |
Background Information |
TE36.27a - Letter - Kingswood Road South Heritage Conservation District (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32480.pdf) |
TE36.28 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 20 |
150 College Street (170 College Street, Mining Building, University of Toronto) – Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement and Amendment of the Designating By-law |
Origin |
(June 14, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the property at 150 College Street (also known as 170 College Street).
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement.
3. City Council amend By-Law No. 88-76 designating the property at 150 College Street (also known as 170 College Street and containing the Mining Building) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to update the By-law by revising the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council grant authority to enter into a heritage easement agreement for the property at 150 College Street (also known as 170 College Street which contains the Mining Building, University of Toronto) and amend By-law No. 88-76 designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to revise the Reasons for Designation to describe the site’s cultural heritage values and attributes.
The property is located on the northeast corner of College Street and King’s College Road. The University of Toronto’s Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering is converting the Mining Building as its Centre for Innovation in the Canadian Mining Industry. The University of Toronto has agreed to enter into a heritage easement agreement with the City. It is the practice of the City when executing a heritage easement agreement on a previously designated property to amend the designating bylaw to reflect the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.28 - Staff Report - 150 College Street - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32481.pdf) |
28a | 150 College Street (170 College Street, Mining Building, University of Toronto) - Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement and Amendment of the Designating By-law |
Origin |
(June 30, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the property at 150 College Street (also known as 170 College Street).
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement.
3. City Council amend By-Law No. 88-76 designating the property at 150 College Street (also known as 170 College Street and containing the Mining Building) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to update the By-law by revising the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on June 30, 2010, considered the report (June 14, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting 150 College Street (170 College Street, Mining Building, University of Toronto) – Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement and Amendment of the Designating By-law. |
Background Information |
TE36.28a - Letter - 150 College Street - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32482.pdf) |
TE36.29 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 20 |
King Street West Properties - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Amendment of Designating By-law |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act:
a. 212 King Street West (Union Building) b. 220 King Street West (Nicholls Building) c. 266 King Street West (Reid Building) d. 276 King Street West (Gillett Building) e. 284 King Street West (Anderson Building) f. 322 King Street West (Eclipse Whitewear Building).
2. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.
4. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review board in support of Council’s decision on the designations of the properties.
5. City Council amend City of Toronto By-law 512-75 for the property at 260 King Street West to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.
6. Should the owner appeal the amending of the designating by-law, City Council authorize the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.
7. Should the owner appeal the amending of the by-law, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Conservation Review Board in support of the proposed amendment.
8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act the properties listed in Recommendation No. 1 below, and to amend City of Toronto By-law No. 512-75 designating the property at 260 King Street West (Royal Alexandra Theatre) to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.
At its meeting of April 27, 2010, the Toronto and East York Community Council adopted a motion requesting a staff report on the potential designation of the properties at 212, 220, 266-270 and 274 King Street West, which are listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties. The Community Council also requested that staff report on any necessary amendments to the designating by-laws for the properties at 214 King Street West and 260 King Street West, including the amendment of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the latter site. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.29 - Staff Report - King Street West Properties - Intention to Designate (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32565.pdf) |
29a | King Street West Properties - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Amendment of Designating By-law |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act:
a. 212 King Street West (Union Building); b. 220 King Street West (Nicholls Building); c. 266 King Street West (Reid Building); d. 276 King Street West (Gillett Building); e. 284 King Street West (Anderson Building); and f. 322 King Street West (Eclipse Whitewear Building).
2. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.
4. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designations of the properties.
5. City Council amend City of Toronto By-law 512-75 for the property at 260 King Street West to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.
6. Should the owner appeal the amending of the designating by-law, City Council authorize the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.
7. Should the owner appeal the amending of the by-law, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Conservation Review Board in support of the proposed amendment.
8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the following:
1. Report (July 13, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting King Street West Properties - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Amendment of Designating By-law; and
2. Communication (July 29, 2010) from David Mirvish.
Andrea E. Paterson, MCIP, RPP, Land Use Planner, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP addressed the Toronto Preservation Board. |
Background Information |
TE36.29a - Letter - King Street West Properties - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32483.pdf) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.37 for Public Presentation and Debate) |
29b | Heritage Properties on King Street West Between Simcoe Street and Duncan Street |
Origin |
(June 1, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Summary |
The purpose of this information report is to inform City Council that Heritage Preservation Services does not currently have the staff resources required to accommodate the recommendation of Toronto and East York Community Council to report on necessary amendments to the designation by-laws for the properties at 214 and 260 King Street West, nor to complete the designation reports for the properties at 212, 220, 266-270 and 274 King Street West by the requested date of June 22, 2010. This report also informs Council of the dates for which a report can be prepared. |
Background Information |
TE36.29b - Staff Report - Heritage Properties on King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31754.pdf) |
TE36.30 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 28 |
6-16 Glen Road – Amendment to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(July 16, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the revised Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachment Nos. 4-6 of this report.
2. Upon receipt of the owners’ withdrawal of their notice of objection, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce a bill in Council with the amended Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachment Nos. 4-6, designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council amend the Reasons for Designation for the properties at 6-16 Glen Road (Glen Road Houses) as adopted by City Council at its meeting of November 19 and 20, 2007, and that City Council pass the by-law designating the properties at 6-16 Glen Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
On December 7, 2007, City Council served notice of its intention to designate the properties at 6-16 Glen Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The representatives of the owners of the Glen Road properties submitted an objection to the notice of intention to designate and the matter was referred to the Conservation Review Board. The owners have now agreed to withdraw their objection subject to minor revisions to the original Reasons for Designation (Attachment No. 3) and their replacement by the revised Reasons for Designation (Attachment Nos. 4-6).
Heritage Preservation Services is satisfied that the revised Reasons for Designation will ensure that the properties’ cultural heritage values and attributes are preserved. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.30 - Staff Report - 6-16 Glen Road - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32484.pdf) |
30a | 6-16 Glen Road - Amendment to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law Under Part IV, Section of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council adopt the revised Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachment Nos. 4-6 of this report.
2. Upon receipt of the owners’ withdrawal of their notice of objection, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce a bill in Council with the amended Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachment Nos. 4-6, designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the report (July 16, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting 6-16 Glen Road – Amendment to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Background Information |
TE36.30a - Letter - 6-16 Glen Road - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32485.pdf) |
TE36.31 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 28 |
Howard Street Neighbourhood – Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(June 17, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council include the following properties on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties:
a. 2 Glen Road b. 4 Howard Street c. 8 Howard Street d. 32 Howard Street e. 34 Howard Street f. 601 Sherbourne Street g. 605 Sherbourne Street h. 607 Sherbourne Street.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act:
a. 1 Edgedale Road b. 3 Edgedale Road c. 5 Edgedale Road d. 7 Edgedale Road e. 9 Edgedale Road f. 11 Edgedale Road g. 1 Glen Road h. 2 Glen Road i. 7 Glen Road j. 9 Glen Road k. 4 Howard Street l. 8 Howard Street m. 21 Howard Street n. 23 Howard Street o. 25 Howard Street p. 27 Howard Street q. 29 Howard Street r. 31 Howard Street s. 32 Howard Street t. 33 Howard Street u. 34 Howard Street v. 35 Howard Street w. 76 Howard Street x. 601 Sherbourne Street y. 603 Sherbourne Street z. 605 Sherbourne Street aa. 607 Sherbourne Street.
3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designations of the properties. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act the properties listed in Recommendation No. 2. The properties are located on Howard Street, Glen Road and Edgedale Road in the neighbourhood east of Sherbourne Street and south of Bloor Street East. The majority of the properties are listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the properties meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. A development application is pending that would affect many of the subject sites. The designation of the properties would enable City Council to control alterations to the sites, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.31 - Staff Report - Howard Street Neighbourhood - Heritage Intention to Designate (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32529.pdf) |
Communications |
(July 28, 2010) Letter from Kim M. Kovar (TE.New.TE36.31.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Kim Kovar, Aird and Berlis, LLP (TE.New.TE36.31.2) |
31a | Howard Street Neighbourhood - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council include the following properties on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties:
a. 2 Glen Road; b. 4 Howard Street; c. 8 Howard Street; d. 32 Howard Street; e. 34 Howard Street; f. 601 Sherbourne Street; g. 605 Sherbourne Street; and h. 607 Sherbourne Street.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act:
a. 1 Edgedale Road; b. 3 Edgedale Road; c. 5 Edgedale Road; d. 7 Edgedale Road; e. 9 Edgedale Road; f. 11 Edgedale Road; g. 1 Glen Road; h. 2 Glen Road; i. 7 Glen Road; j. 9 Glen Road; k. 4 Howard Street; l. 8 Howard Street; m. 21 Howard Street; n. 23 Howard Street; o. 25 Howard Street; p. 27 Howard Street; q. 29 Howard Street; r. 31 Howard Street; s. 32 Howard Street; t. 33 Howard Street; u. 34 Howard Street; v. 35 Howard Street; w. 76 Howard Street; x. 601 Sherbourne Street; y. 603 Sherbourne Street; z. 605 Sherbourne Street; and aa. 607 Sherbourne Street.
3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorized the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designations of the properties. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the following:
1. Report (July 17, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting Howard Street Neighbourhood - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act;
2. Communication (July 28, 2010) from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis, LLP; and
3. Communication (July 29, 2010) from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale. |
Background Information |
TE36.31a - Letter - Howard Street Neighbourhood - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32486.pdf) |
TE36.32 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 30 |
St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse – Designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Repeal of Designating By-law No. 357-2006 |
Origin |
(July 12, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse in its new location in Riverdale Park as shown on Attachment Nos. 1-3 of the report dated July 12, 2010, from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division.
2. If there are no objections to the proposed designation of the property referred to in Recommendation 1, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections to the proposed designation of the property referred to in Recommendation 1, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
4. City Council state its intention to repeal By-law No. 357-2006 under Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act, being the designation of the property at 548 Gerrard Street East pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, which was the original site of the St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse prior to the relocation of the clubhouse to Riverdale Park in 2009.
5. If there are no objections to the proposed repeal of By-law No. 357-2006 as contemplated in Recommendation 4, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council repealing By-law No. 357-2006 pursuant to Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
6. If there are objections to the proposed repeal of By-law No. 357-2006 as contemplated in Recommendation 4, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repealing by-law to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to delete By-law No. 357-2006 from the title of the former site.
8. City Council authorize and direct City Officials to take necessary action to give effect to the foregoing in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, including the giving of notice and updating the register of properties with cultural heritage value or interest as applicable. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse in its new location in Riverdale Park, and to repeal By-law No. 357-2006 designating the property at 548 Gerrard Street East where the lawn bowling clubhouse was formerly sited.
As a result of the approval of the Bridgepoint Health Master Plan, the land exchange between the City and Bridgepoint Health, and conditions of development approval, the St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse was relocated to the southeast quadrant of Riverdale Park in 2009. It is necessary to repeal By-law No. 357-2006 to remove the designation from the property on Gerrard Street East where the clubhouse was originally sited, and pass a new designating by-law to protect the cultural heritage values and attributes of the clubhouse in its new location. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.32 - Staff Report - St. Matthew's Lawn Bowling Clubhouse - Heritage Designation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32487.pdf) |
32a | St. Matthew's Lawn Bowling Clubhouse - Designation Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Repeal of Designating By-law No. 357-2006 |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse in its new location in Riverdale Park as shown on Attachment Nos. 1-3 of this report.
2. If there are no objections to the proposed designation of the property referred to in Recommendation 1, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections to the proposed designation of the property referred to in Recommendation 1, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
4. City Council state its intention to repeal By-law No. 357-2006 under Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act, being the designation of the property at 548 Gerrard Street East pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, which was the original site of the St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Clubhouse prior to the relocation of the clubhouse to Riverdale Park in 2009.
5. If there are no objections to the proposed repeal of By-law No. 357-2006 as contemplated in Recommendation 4, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council repealing By-law No. 357-2006 pursuant to Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
6. If there are objections to the proposed repeal of By-law No. 357-2006 as contemplated in Recommendation 4, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repealing by-law to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to delete By-law No. 357-2006 from the title of the former site.
8. City Council authorize and direct City officials to take necessary action to give effect to the foregoing in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, including the giving of notice and updating the register of properties with cultural heritage value or interest as applicable. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the report (July 12, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting St. Matthew's Lawn Bowling Clubhouse - Designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Repeal of Designating By-law No. 357-2006. |
Background Information |
TE36.32a - Letter - St. Matthew's Lawn Bowling Clubhouse - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32488.pdf) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.12) |
TE36.33 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 30 |
450 Pape Avenue - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(March 29, 2010) Report from the Acing Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council include the property at 450 Pape Avenue (William Harris House) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 450 Pape Avenue (William Harris House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the proposed designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the proposed designation of the property. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council include the property at 450 Pape Avenue (William Harris House) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
At its meeting of September 15, 2009, Toronto and East York Community Council referred a letter dated September 10, 2009 from Councillor Paula Fletcher to the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, to consider a request to have the property at 450 Pape Avenue designated as a heritage property and to report to the Toronto Preservation Board and Toronto and East York Community Council on this matter.
Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the property at 450 Pape Avenue meets Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed by the Province of Ontario for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. If City Council states its intention to designate the property, the owner would be required to apply to Council for permission to alter and/or demolish the building and structures under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. The public Notice of Intention to Designate will be advertised on the City’s web site in accordance with the City of Toronto Act provisions. |
Background Information |
TE36.33 - Staff Report - 450 Pape Avenue - Intention to Designate - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31734.pdf) |
Communications |
(June 21, 2010) E-mail from James F. Harris (TE.Main.TE36.33.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Andrew L. Jeanrie, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (TE.New.TE36.33.2) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.12a) |
33a | 450 Pape Avenue - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(May 28, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council include the property at 450 Pape Avenue (William Harris House) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 450 Pape Avenue (William Harris House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the proposed designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the proposed designation of the property. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on May 28, 2010, considered the report (March 29, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting 450 Pape Avenue – Intention to Designate under part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Background Information |
TE36.33a - Letter - 450 Pape Avenue - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31992.pdf) |
TE36.34 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 30 |
558 (562) Gerrard Street East (Governor’s House), Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property |
Origin |
(July 14, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 558 Gerrard Street East (Governor’s House), substantially in accordance with the Select Plans and Drawings (Appendix II) of the Heritage Impact Assessment for 558/562 Gerrard Street East, Don Jail Governor’s House, Toronto, Ontario, prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated April 2010, subject to the following conditions:
a. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed alterations, including a permit for demolition, excavation and/or shoring, the owner/applicant shall provide:
i. a Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant (“Heritage Consultant”) to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the Don Jail Governor’s House prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated April 2010, that describes in detail all proposed conservation work and the methods and materials to be used in undertaking the conservation work as well as photographic documentation of the as-found condition of the Governor’s House. The Conservation Plan shall include the significant deficiencies as outlined in the report prepared by ERA Architects Inc., Condition Assessment Report, Governor’s House, Gatekeeper’s House and St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Club, 548 and 558 Gerrard Street East, October 4, 2005 as updated July 21, 2009;
ii. a final Landscape Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services that also illustrates the parkland directly adjacent to the Governor’s House and that identifies the limit of lands leased to the Philip Aziz Centre;
iii. a Letter of Credit in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan, with the exception of the amount previously secured pursuant to other applicable agreements with the City toward correction of the significant deficiencies as set out in this report; and
iv. building permit drawings including plans and elevations as well as specifications for the heritage conservation work to be prepared by the Heritage Consultant, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit to secure the conservation work, the owner/applicant shall provide a notice of substantial completion signed by the Heritage Consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, for the heritage conservation work included in the Conservation Plan.
c. The owner/applicant shall undertake archaeological monitoring of the property during construction in order to document any buried landscape features that may still exist, and shall contact the Ministry of Culture and the City of Toronto Heritage Preservation Services Unit immediately in the event that deeply buried archaeological remains are encountered. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend the approval of alterations to the designated heritage property at 558 Gerrard Street East, the Don Jail Governor’s House. The Philip Aziz Centre for Hospice and Palliative Care (the “Philip Aziz Centre”), is proposing to construct an addition to the rear of the Governor’s House to allow for its adaptive reuse as a non profit children’s hospice. The proposal also includes rehabilitation of the historic Gatekeeper’s House adjacent to the Governor’s House, for administrative space needed to support the children’s home program.
This report further recommends as conditions of approval that the owner/applicant provide a Conservation Plan and a Letter of Credit to secure the conservation work to the Governor’s House as generally outlined in this report, prior to the issuing of building permits. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.34 - Staff Report - 558 (562) Gerrard Street East - Heritage Property (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32489.pdf) |
34a | 558 (562) Gerrard Street East (Governor's House), Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 558 Gerrard Street East (Governor’s House), substantially in accordance with the Select Plans and Drawings (Appendix II) of the Heritage Impact Assessment for 558/562 Gerrard Street East, Don Jail Governor’s House, Toronto, Ontario, prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated April 2010, subject to the following conditions:
a. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed alterations, including a permit for demolition, excavation and/or shoring, the owner/ applicant shall provide:
i. a Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant (“Heritage Consultant”) to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the Don Jail Governor’s House prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated April 2010, that describes in detail all proposed conservation work and the methods and materials to be used in undertaking the conservation work as well as photographic documentation of the as-found condition of the Governor’s House. The Conservation Plan shall include the significant deficiencies as outlined in the report prepared by ERA Architects Inc., Condition Assessment Report, Governor’s House, Gatekeeper’s House and St. Matthew’s Lawn Bowling Club, 548 and 558 Gerrard Street East, October 4, 2005 as updated July 21, 2009;
ii. a final Landscape Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services that also illustrates the parkland directly adjacent to the Governor’s House and that identifies the limit of lands leased to the Philip Aziz Centre;
iii. a Letter of Credit in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan, with the exception of the amount previously secured pursuant to other applicable agreements with the City toward correction of the significant deficiencies as set out in this report; and
iv. building permit drawings including plans and elevations as well as specifications for the heritage conservation work to be prepared by the Heritage Consultant, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit to secure the conservation work, the owner/applicant shall provide a notice of substantial completion signed by the Heritage Consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, for the heritage conservation work included in the Conservation Plan.
c. The owner/applicant shall undertake archaeological monitoring of the property during construction in order to document any buried landscape features that may still exist, and shall contact the Ministry of Culture and the City of Toronto Heritage Preservation Services Unit immediately in the event that deeply buried archaeological remains are encountered. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the following:
1. Report (July 14, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting 558 (562) Gerrard Street East (Governor's House), Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property;
2. Communication (July 24, 2010) from Amy Lee, Volunteer, Toronto East Chinatown Business Association Inc.; and
3. Petition (July 26, 2010) from Beatrice Lam, Toronto East Chinatown Business Association Inc. signed by approximately 945 people.
The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:
- David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP; - Charles Rosenberg, Hilditch Architect; - Sharon Vattay, B.A., M.A. Ph.D., CAHP, Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects; - Andrew James; - Daniel Dias; and - Beatrice Lam; and filed a submission. |
Background Information |
TE36.34a - Letter - 558 (562) Gerrard Street East - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32490.pdf) |
TE36.35 | ACTION |
4:00 PM |
|
Ward: 27 |
50 St. Joseph Street and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place - Partial Repeal and Amendment of Designating By-law |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to partially repeal City of Toronto By-law 468-91 under Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act, designating the properties at 50 St. Joseph Street (Cloverhill Wing, St. Michael’s College) and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, to remove the references to the portions of the site legally described as Plan 66R-16274, Parts 2, 3, 12 and 13, from Schedules “A” and “C”.
2. If there are no objections to the proposed partial repeal of By-law 468-91, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council partially repealing the by-law pursuant to Part 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections to the proposed partial repeal of By-law 468-91, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repealing by-law to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
4. If the partial repeal of By-law 468-91 is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the partial repeal of By-law 468-91.
5. City Council amend By-law No. 468-91 under Section 30 of the Ontario Heritage Act to revise the Reasons for Designation to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the properties and describe their heritage attributes.
6. It the owner does not object to the amending of By-law No. 468-91, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council amending By-law No. 468-91 pursuant to Part IV, Section 30 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
7. Should the owner appeal the amending of By-law 468-91, City Council authorize the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
8. If the amending of By-law 468-91 is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Conservation Review Board in support of the proposed amending of By-law 468-91.
9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing. |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council partially repeal and amend City of Toronto By-law 468-91, designating the properties at 50 St. Joseph Street and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to remove the portions of the site described as Parts 2, 3, 12 and 13 on Plan 66R-16274 from the legal description, and revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 changes to the Ontario Heritage Act.
As the result of amendments to the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law for the property at 50 St. Joseph Street, it is necessary to partially repeal By-law 468-91 to remove the designation from the parts of the site approved for redevelopment. In accordance with the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act, it is the practice of the City when updating designating by-laws to revise the Reasons for Designation to describe the property’s cultural heritage values and attributes. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.35 - Staff Report - 50 St. Joseph Street and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32491.pdf) |
35a | 50 St. Joseph Street and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place - Partial Repeal and Amendment of Designating By-law |
Origin |
(July 29, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Recommendations |
The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. City Council state its intention to partially repeal City of Toronto By-law 468-91 under Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act, designating the properties at 50 St. Joseph Street (Cloverhill Wing, St. Michael’s College) and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, to remove the references to the portions of the site legally described as Plan 66R-16274, Parts 2, 3, 12 and 13, from Schedules “A” and “C”.
2. If there are no objections to the proposed partial repeal of By-law 468-91, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council partially repealing the by-law pursuant to Part 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections to the proposed partial repeal of By-law 468-91, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repealing by-law to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
4. If the partial repeal of By-law 468-91 is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the partial repeal of By-law 468-91.
5. City Council amend By-law No. 468-91 under Section 30 of the Ontario Heritage Act to revise the Reasons for Designation to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the properties and describe their heritage attributes.
6. It the owner does not object to the amending of By-law No. 468-91, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council amending By-law No. 468-91 pursuant to Part IV, Section 30 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
7. Should the owner appeal the amending of By-law 468-91, City Council authorize the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.
8. If the amending of By-law 468-91 is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend at the Conservation Review Board in support of the proposed amending of By-law 468-91.
9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing. |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 29, 2010, considered the report (July 20, 2010) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting 50 St. Joseph Street and 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place - Partial Repeal and Amendment of Designating By-law. |
Background Information |
TE36.35a - Letter - 50 St. Joseph, 1, 3 and 5 Elmsley Place - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32492.pdf) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.19) |
TE36.36 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Residential Demolition Application - 655 Soudan Avenue |
Origin |
(June 4, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Toronto Buildings recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the application to demolish the residential building at 655 Soudan Avenue because a building permit had been issued, for a replacement building on the site, with the following conditions:
a. The owner construct and substantially complete the new building to be erected on the site not less than two years from the day of demolition of the existing residential building is commenced.
b. Failure to complete the new building within two years, the City Clerk is entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in the like manner of taxes, $20,000 and shall, until payment thereof, be a lien or charge upon the land in respect of which the permit to demolish is issued. |
Summary |
In accordance with City-wide residential demolition control under Article II, Demolition Control, of Municipal Code Ch. 363, as amended by By-law No.1009-2006, enacted by the City Council on September 27, 2006 under the authority of section 33 of the Planning Act, I refer the demolition application for 655 Soudan Avenue to you, whether to grant or refuse the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit.
This staff report is about a matter for which the community council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. |
Financial Impact |
Not applicable. |
Background Information |
TE36.36 - Staff Report - 655 Soudan Avenue - Residential Demolition (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31735.pdf) TE36.36 - Staff Report - 655 Soudan Avenue - Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31736.pdf) |
Communications |
(June 21, 2010) E-mail from Carlos Efstathiou (TE.Main.TE36.36.1) (July 7, 2010) Letter from Effie Lidakis, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart & Biggart LLP, addressed to the Chief Building Official (TE.Main.TE36.36.2) |
TE36.37 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Residential Demolition Application - 114 Forest Hill Road |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Acting Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Toronto Building recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refuse the application to demolish the subject residential building because there is no building permit for a replacement building on the site.
In the alternative,
2. Approve the application to demolish the subject residential buildings without conditions.
Or
3. Approve the application to demolish the subject residential building with the following condition:
a. Any reasonable conditions which have regard to the nature of the residential property, including the preservation of significant natural features and requiring the erection and maintenance of structures and enclosures. |
Summary |
In accordance with City-wide residential demolition control under Article II, Demolition Control, of Municipal Code Ch. 363, as amended by By-law No.1009-2006, enacted by the City Council on September 27, 2006 under the authority of section 33 of the Planning Act, I refer the demolition application for 114 Forest Hill Road for consideration, on whether to grant or refuse the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit.
This staff report is about a matter for which the community council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. |
Financial Impact |
Not applicable. |
Background Information |
TE36.37 - Staff Report - 114 Forest Hill Road - Residential Demolition Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32493.pdf) TE36.37 - Staff Report - 114 Forest Hill Road - Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32494.pdf) |
TE36.38 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Appeal of the Denial of a Boulevard Cafe Extension Application Located at 539 College Street |
Origin |
(July 22, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the application for the proposed boulevard café extension on the commercial frontage of 539 College Street. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the appeal received July 15, 2010 from the business owner representing 1354461 Ontario Inc, operating as Perla, for the refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards, based on the physical criteria inspection conducted in the matter of an extension application for a boulevard café permit located on the commercial frontage of 539 College Street. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.38 - Staff Report - 539 College Street - Denial Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32495.pdf) TE36.38 - Staff Report - 539 College Street - Appendices (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32496.pdf) |
TE36.39 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Appeal of the Denial of a Boulevard Cafe Extension Application Located at 720 College Street, Crawford Street Flankage |
Origin |
(July 22, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the application for the proposed boulevard café extension at 720 College Street, Crawford Street flankage. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the appeal received June 2, 2010 from the business owner representing IL Gatto Nero Inc, operating as IL Gatto Nero for the refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards, based on the physical criteria inspection conducted in the matter, of an extension application for a boulevard café permit located at 720 College Street, Crawford Street flankage. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.39 - Staff Report - 720 College Street - Denial Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32497.pdf) TE36.39 - Staff Report - 720 College Street - Appendices (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32498.pdf) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.25) |
TE36.40 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
Appeal of the Denial of a Boulevard Cafe Permit Located on the Commercial Frontage of 511 Danforth Avenue |
Origin |
(May 31, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the application for the proposed boulevard café on the commercial frontage of 511 Danforth Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards based on objections received to the 14-day public posting on the application for a boulevard café permit on the commercial frontage of 511 Danforth Avenue. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.40 - Staff Report - 511 Danforth Avenue - Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31737.pdf) TE36.40 - Staff Report - 511 Danforth Avenue - Attachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31738.pdf) |
TE36.41 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
Request for an Art Mural Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 485-Graffiti at 929 Queen Street East |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council not exempt the markings at 929 Queen Street East as an art mural by confirming the notice and directing that a second notice be issued. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant is the property owner who has requested a review of a notice given for graffiti in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 485 Graffiti to give consideration to the wall markings being classed as an Art Mural.
The Graffiti by-law provides in Section 4E. that an owner on whom a notice has been issued may request that the issuance of the notice be reviewed by the Toronto and East York Community Council on the basis that the markings are exempt as an art mural. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact anticipated in this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.41 - Staff Report - 929 Queen Street East - Art Mural Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32507.pdf) TE36.41 - Staff Report - 929 Queen Street East - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32508.pdf) TE36.41 - Staff Report - 929 Queen Street East - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32509.pdf) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.30) |
TE36.42 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 29 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 840 Carlaw Avenue |
Origin |
(May 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 840 Carlaw Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 840 Carlaw Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.42 - Staff Report - 840 Carlaw Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31740.pdf) TE36.42 - Staff Report - 840 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31741.pdf) TE36.42 - Staff Report - 840 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31742.pdf) TE36.42 - Staff Report - 840 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31743.pdf) TE36.42 - Staff Report - 840 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31739.pdf) |
Communications |
(June 17, 2010) Letter from Cynthia Bell (TE.Main.TE36.42.1) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from David Lau (TE.Main.TE36.42.2) (August 7, 2010) E-mail from David Lau and Rebecca Clare and Jim Aylward and Cindy Bell requesting deferral of their Front Yard Parking Appeals until 2011 (TE.New.TE36.42.3) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.31) |
TE36.43 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 29 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 842 Carlaw Avenue |
Origin |
(May 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 842 Carlaw Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 842 Carlaw Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.43 - Staff Report - 842 Carlaw Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31744.pdf) TE36.43 - Staff Report - 842 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31745.pdf) TE36.43 - Staff Report - 842 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31746.pdf) TE36.43 - Staff Report - 842 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31747.pdf) TE36.43 - Staff Report - 842 Carlaw Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31748.pdf) |
Communications |
(June 17, 2010) Letter from Cynthia Bell (TE.Main.TE36.43.1) (June 21, 2010) E-mail from David Lau (TE.Main.TE36.43.2) (August 7, 2010) E-mail from David Lau and Rebecca Clare and Jim Aylward and Cindy Bell requesting deferral of their Front Yard Parking Appeals until 2011 (TE.New.TE36.43.3) |
TE36.44 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 29 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 179 Milverton Boulevard |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 179 Milverton Boulevard. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 179 Milverton Boulevard for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.44 - Staff Report - 179 Milverton Boulevard - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32514.pdf) TE36.44 - Staff Report - 179 Milverton Boulevard - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32515.pdf) TE36.44 - Staff Report - 179 Milverton Boulevard - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32516.pdf) TE36.44 - Staff Report - 179 Milverton Boulevard - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32517.pdf) TE36.44 - Staff Report - 179 Milverton Boulevard - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32518.pdf) |
TE36.45 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 29 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 98 Cadorna Avenue |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 98 Cadorna Avenue.
2. Request the applicant to remove the existing paving adjacent to the mutual drive, with the exception of a walkway of 1.06 meters, and restore the area to soft landscaping, as shown on Appendix ‘E’. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 98 Cadorna Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.45 - Staff Report - 98 Cadorna Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32519.pdf) TE36.45 - Staff Report - 98 Cadorna Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32520.pdf) TE36.45 - Staff Report - 98 Cadorna Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32521.pdf) TE36.45 - Staff Report - 98 Cadorna Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32522.pdf) TE36.45 - Staff Report - 98 Cadorna Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32523.pdf) TE36.45 - Staff Report - 98 Cadorna Avenue - Appendix E (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32524.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 10, 2010) E-mail from Linda Blakey (TE.New.TE36.45.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Anthony Moots and family (TE.New.TE36.45.2) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.33) |
TE36.46 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 409 Scarborough Road |
Origin |
(May 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 409 Scarborough Road. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 409 Scarborough Road for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.46 - Staff Report - 409 Scarborough Road - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31749.pdf) TE36.46 - Staff Report - 409 Scarborough Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31750.pdf) TE36.46 - Staff Report - 409 Scarborough Road - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31751.pdf) TE36.46 - Staff Report - 409 Scarborough Road - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31752.pdf) TE36.46 - Staff Report - 409 Scarborough Road - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31753.pdf) |
Communications |
(November 25, 2009) Petition from David McMillan signed by approximately 27 individuals in support of the application for the front yard parking pad at 409 Scarborough Road. (TE.Main.TE36.46.1) (August 16, 2010) E-mail from Sheryl Mann (TE.New.TE36.46.2) |
TE36.47 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 109 Hiawatha Road |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 109 Hiawatha Road. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 109 Hiawatha Road for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.47 - Staff Report - 109 Hiawatha Road - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32531.pdf) TE36.47 - Staff Report - 109 Hiawatha Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32532.pdf) TE36.47 - Staff Report - 109 Hiawatha Road - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32533.pdf) TE36.47 - Staff Report - 109 Hiawatha Road - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32534.pdf) TE36.47 - Staff Report - 109 Hiawatha Road - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32535.pdf) |
TE36.48 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 138 Silver Birch Avenue |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deny the request for front yard parking at 138 Silver Birch Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 138 Silver Birch Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.48 - Staff Report - 138 Silver Birch Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32537.pdf) TE36.48 - Staff Report - 138 Silver Birch Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32538.pdf) TE36.48 - Staff Report - 138 Silver Birch Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32539.pdf) TE36.48 - Staff Report - 138 Silver Birch Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32540.pdf) TE36.48 - Staff Report - 138 Silver Birch Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32541.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 12, 2010) E-mail from Toby Pilling (TE.New.TE36.48.1) |
TE36.49 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 268 Montrose Avenue |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council not grant the fence exemption for 268 Montrose Avenue, confirm the notice and direct that a second notice be issued to the property owner. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant being the property owner is seeking exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to permit the existing wooden fence, at the rear of the property, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence can be constructed to a height of 2.0 metres.
The sections of fence on the north, west and east sides of the property are constructed to a height of 2.51 metres (which includes a retaining wall at the base). These sections of fence are not in compliance with the By-law. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact anticipated in this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.49 - Staff Report - 268 Montrose Avenue - Fence Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32542.pdf) TE36.49 - Staff Report - 268 Montrose Avenue - Photographs 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32607.pdf) TE36.49 - Staff Report - 268 Montrose Avenue - Photographs 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32608.pdf) TE36.49 - Staff Report - 268 Montrose Avenue - Photographs 3 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32609.pdf) TE36.49 - Staff Report - 268 Montrose Avenue - Photographs 4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32610.pdf) TE36.49 - Staff Report - 268 Montrose Avenue - Photographs 5 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32611.pdf) |
TE36.50 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 523 Soudan Avenue |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council not grant the fence exemption for 523 Soudan Avenue, confirm the notice and direct that a second notice be issued to the property owner. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant, being the property owner is seeking exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to permit the existing fence in the rear yard, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence in the rear yard area can be constructed to a height of 2 metres.
The fence in the rear yard for which an exemption is being requested consists of a wooden fence 2.76 metres in height and 5.5 metres in length situated on the east side of the rear yard. The fence structure consists of board on board fence with lattice affixed on top. The fence in the rear yard does not comply with the maximum permitted height of 2 metres. (Attachment 1) |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact anticipated in this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.50 - Staff Report - 523 Soudan Avenue - Fence Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32543.pdf) TE36.50 - Staff Report - 523 Soudan Avenue - Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32544.pdf) |
TE36.51 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 95 Marlborough Avenue |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council not grant the fence exemption for 95 Marlborough Avenue, confirm the notice and direct that a second notice be issued to the property owner. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider a request by the owner of 95 Marlborough Avenue to be exempted from Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-3 C 2(a). This section states that the maximum height of a fence in the front yard cannot exceed 1.4 metres and 2.0 metres in the rear yard.
The existing solid wood and post fence in the front yard stands approximately 2.59 metres in height and approximately 2.74 metres in length, along the east property line separating the front entrances. The existing lattice and solid wood fences in the rear yard stands approximately 2.4 metres and is approximately 10.36 metres in length along the east property line, 6.09 metres along the south property line and 16.76 metres along the west property line. The solid wood fence on the rear deck measures 3.1 metres in length and 2.4 metres in height along the east property line. See Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact anticipated in this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.51 - Staff Report - 95 Marlborough Avenue - Fence Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32547.pdf) TE36.51 - Staff Report - 95 Marlborough Avenue - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32548.pdf) TE36.51 - Staff Report - 95 Marlborough Avenue - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32549.pdf) TE36.51 - Staff Report - 95 Marlborough Avenue - Attachment 3 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32550.pdf) TE36.51 - Staff Report - 95 Marlborough Avenue - Attachment 4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32551.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 12, 2010) Letter from Elizabeth McGregor (TE.Supp.TE36.51.1) |
TE36.52 | ACTION |
5:00 PM |
|
Ward: 20 |
Request for an Exemption to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 591 - Noise at 180 University Avenue |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The Municipal Licensing and Standards Division recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council not grant the noise exemption for 180 University Avenue. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to consider a request by the agent for the owner(s) of 180 University Avenue for an exemption from Chapter 591 - Noise, related to construction activities. The City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 591 - Noise, regulates noise producing activities which are likely to disturb the peace, rest, enjoyment, comfort or convenience of the inhabitants of the City of Toronto. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact anticipated in this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.52 - Staff Report - 180 University Avenue - Noise Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32552.pdf) |
TE36.53 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
301 Front Street West - Public Art Plan |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Urban Design |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council approve the 301 Front Street West - Public Art Plan, attached to the report dated July 27, 2010, from the Director, Urban Design. |
Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 301 Front Street West - Public Art Plan. The plan has been prepared by the owner in compliance with the development approval provisions. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in the publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.
The entire development site is located on 2.2 hectares of land and is partially occupied by the CN Tower. This facility will be adding to the tourist and entertainment land use development in this area. The first phase of development on this site is a proposed aquarium on 14,000 square metres of land. The attached public art plan outlines the owner’s intent on providing public art in locations that will be prominent and accessible to the public. The surrounding area has a number of public facilities and infrastructure.
The 301 Front Street - Public Art Plan provides a framework for the commissioning of art in the proposed locations. The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning Percent for the Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.53 - Staff Report - 301 Front Street West - Public Art Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32553.pdf) TE36.53 - Staff Report - 301 Front Street West - Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32554.pdf) |
TE36.54 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 27 |
580 Jarvis Street - Public Art Plan |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Urban Design |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council approve the 580 Jarvis Street - Public Art Plan, attached to the report dated July 27, 2010 from the Director, Urban Design. |
Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 580 Jarvis Street - Public Art Plan. The plan has been prepared by the owner in compliance with the development approval provisions. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in the publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.
The development is located at the south-west corner of Charles Street East, Jarvis Street and Mount Pleasant Road. This site forms both a physical and visual terminus of Mount Pleasant Road and is identified in the Official Plan as a ‘significant’ intersection. The proposed building is a residential condominium tower, setback from the street by a base podium framing Jarvis Street and Charles Street East, with retail on the ground floor fronting Jarvis Street.
The 580 Jarvis Street - Public Art Plan provides a framework for a Public Art Commission including the site context, location and project description, history, public art site, art selection process, the jury, allocation of budget and schedule. The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Project and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.54 - Staff Report - 580 Jarvis Street - Public Art Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32555.pdf) TE36.54 - Staff Report - 580 Jarvis Street - Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32556.pdf) |
TE36.55 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 28 |
8 The Esplanade/1 Front Street East - Public Art Plan |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Urban Design |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council approve the 8 The Esplanade/1 Front Street East - Public Art Plan, attached to the report dated July 27, 2010, from the Director, Urban Design. |
Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 8 The Esplanade/1 Front Street East - Public Art Plan. The plan has been prepared by the owner in compliance with the development approval provisions. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in the publicly-accessible, publicly-owned area of the development site.
This site is located within the designated St. Lawrence Neighbourhood. The development site in its entirety is a block bounded by Front Street to the north, Scott Street to the east, The Esplanade to the south and Yonge Street to the west. The proposal for this block is a mix-use development which includes the expansion of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts (municipal address of 1 Front Street East) and a new 57-storey residential tower (municipal address 8 The Esplanade). The Sony Centre occupies a significant footprint and presence in the block and is a landmark that has been designated a historic building donated to the City of Toronto.
The 8 The Esplanade/1 Front Street East - Public Art Plan provides a framework for a Public Art Commission in the proposed location. The attached plan meets the objectives of the City Planning Percent for the Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.55 - Staff Report - 8 The Esplanade, 1 Front Street East - Public Art Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32557.pdf) TE36.55 - Staff Report - 8 The Esplanade/1 Front Street East - Attachment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32558.pdf) |
TE36.56 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Queen Street West Retail Floorplate Study |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council direct staff to continue working on the Queen Street West Retail Floorplate Study and to bring a final report in the first quarter of 2011.
2. City Council direct staff to establish a working group consisting of area residents and business owners, the Queen Street West BIA, local resident associations, and the Ward Councillor to provide advice and feedback on the study.
3. City Council direct staff to identify any additional changes to the Zoning By-law that may be required for the Zoning to conform to the Heritage Conservation District Plan and report on these in the first quarter of 2011. |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to summarise the progress to date on the Queen Street West Retail Floorplate Study and recommend a work program for a targeted completion of the study in the first quarter of 2011.
At the October 2008 meeting, the Planning and Growth Management Committee directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to submit a report establishing a maximum retail floorplate by-law for the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District.
On July 8, 2010, City Planning staff and the Ward Councillor held a community consultation meeting to discuss the study. Comments received at the meeting strongly favoured additional time for consultation with the various stakeholders in the study area and the creation of a working group to advise staff on issues and concerns related to the study.
This report provides a summary of comments received to date and recommends a consultation process and work program for completion of the study. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.56 - Staff Report - Queen Street West Retail Floorplate Study (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32559.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 13, 2010) E-mail from Laura Schaefer, Coordinator, Queen Street West BIA, forwarding a letter from Marc Glassman, Chair, Queen Street West BIA (TE.New.TE36.56.1) |
TE36.57 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 19 |
Preliminary Report - 30 Ordnance Street - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 30 Ordnance Street together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application proposes to redevelop the property at 30 Ordnance Street with two residential towers, having heights of 30 and 35 storeys respectively. A total of 516 residential units are proposed between the two towers with 466 parking spaces to be provided in four levels of above grade parking and two levels of underground parking. A total of 2,467m2 of non-residential gross floor area is also proposed.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
The application has been circulated to City departments and external agencies, where appropriate, for comment.
The next step is to undertake a community engagement process, which will include a community consultation meeting enabling the public to review the applicant’s submission, and ask questions of City staff and the applicant. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.57 - Staff Report - 30 Ordnance Street - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32560.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 11, 2010) Fax from Richard Douglas (TE.New.TE36.57.1) |
TE36.58 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Preliminary Report - 555 Dupont Street - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(July 23, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 555 Dupont Street together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application was made on May 20, 2010 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to amend Zoning By-law 438-86 to expand the neighbourhood-serving commercial uses permitted at 555 Dupont Street.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
A statutory public meeting is targeted to be held in the fourth quarter of 2010 or the first quarter of 2011. This target date assumes that the applicant will provide all required information in a timely manner. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.58 - Staff Report - 555 Dupont Street - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32561.pdf) |
TE36.59 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Preliminary Report - 156 St. George Street - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 156 St. George Street together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to construct a 5-storey institutional and cultural learning centre with private academic and college dormitory residences at 156 St George Street.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
A Community Consultation meeting is anticipated to be held in late 2010 or early 2011. A final report is targeted for Spring 2011 assuming that applicant provides all required information in a timely manner. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.59 - Staff Report - 156 St. George Street - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32562.pdf) |
TE36.60 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 27 |
Preliminary Report - 395-403 Bloor Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a 42-storey mixed use building comprising a 2-storey podium and 40-storey tower, with 386 residential units and 1,080 square metres of commercial retail space at grade and on the second floor.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application.
It is anticipated that the Final Report will be targeted for the second quarter of 2011, assuming that all required information is provided in a timely manner. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.60 - Staff Report - 395-403 Bloor Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32563.pdf) |
TE36.61 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 27 |
Preliminary Report - 70 St. Mary Street - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications |
Origin |
(July 23, 2010) Report from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council request that the applicant investigate, in consultation with the University of Toronto Secondary Plan stakeholders, the possible exclusive use of the site at 70 St. Mary Street for institutional purpose in accordance with Policy 4.8.6 of the Official Plan.
2. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 70 St. Mary Street together with the Ward Councillor.
3. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
4. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application proposes the demolition of the existing five and a half storey institutional building (located at 70 St. Mary Street), housing members of the Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary, as well as students who rent residence rooms and office uses. A new 19-storey (64-metre) mixed-use building is proposed on the site, including 87 residential condominium units (located within the tower portion of the new building) accessed by way of a separate lobby. In the 8-storey base portion of the building will be 90 student residence rooms, offices, conference room, eight apartments for members of the religious order and a chapel. A total of 90 parking spaces are provided in a two level underground parking garage, with vehicular access proposed from St. Mary Street.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
A Community Consultation meeting is anticipated to be held in the fall/winter of 2010 with a Statutory Public Meeting targeted for summer 2011. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.61 - Staff Report - 70 St. Mary Street - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications - Prelminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32564.pdf) |
TE36.62 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 28 |
Preliminary Report - 424-460 Adelaide Street East - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(July 16, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 424-460 Adelaide Street East together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The application proposes a two-tower residential condominium of 19 and 17 storeys, joined by a common podium ranging from one to nine storeys, at 424-460 Adelaide Street East. A total of 480 units are proposed with three levels of underground parking.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's direction on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
The next step is to conduct a community consultation meeting, to enable the public to review and provide input on the application. This meeting is expected to take place in late 2010 or early 2011. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.62 - Staff Report - 424-460 Adelaide Street East - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32566.pdf) |
TE36.63 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 31 |
Preliminary Report - 825 Coxwell Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. Staff be directed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 825 Coxwell Avenue together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to establish building envelopes to permit the phased redevelopment of the Toronto East General Hospital located at 825 Coxwell Avenue.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
A community consultation meeting is targeted in the winter of 2010-2011, with the statutory meeting targeted for late spring 2011. The target date assumes that the applicant will provide all of the required information in a timely manner.
The application has been circulated to City departments and external agencies, where appropriate, for comment. |
Financial Impact |
The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.63 - Staff Report - 825 Coxwell Avenue - OPA and Rezoning -Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32567.pdf) |
TE36.64 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 28 |
Park Bench Dedicated to the Memory of Al Gosling |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Member Motion from City Council |
Recommendations |
Councillor Ford, seconded by Councillor Mammoliti, recommends that:
1. City Council direct Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff to install a park bench dedicated to the memory of Al Gosling.
2. City Council direct Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff to install the bench in Sherbourne Common or Allan Gardens or another suitable location to be determined in consultation with Peter Crawford.
3. City Council direct that the costs associated with the bench be raised through private donations to the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Commemorative Tree and Bench Program. |
Summary |
City Council on July 6, 7 and 8, 2010, referred Motion MM51.5 by Councillor Ford, seconded by Councillor Mammoliti, to the Toronto and East York Community Council.
Mr. Al Gosling was a tenant of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, at 11 Arleta Avenue, for 21 years before his eviction and subsequent death from health complications on October 11, 2009.
The recent release of the LeSage Report has emphasized the importance of improving our efforts to protect the vulnerable of our society.
In particular, the report recognizes that the Toronto Community Housing Corporation has an obligation to tenants as their landlord, but also a larger obligation to serve the community as a whole through its mandate “to provide quality housing for low and moderate income households and to create community conditions that minimize risk and promote resiliency.”
A park bench dedicated to the memory of Mr. Al Gosling will serve to remind us all of the importance of protecting our most vulnerable residents and that we live up to the standards that we have set for ourselves. |
Background Information |
TE36.64 - Member Motion Referral - Park Bench Dedication - Al Gosling - MM51.5 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32568.pdf) TE36.64 - Member Motion - Park Bench Dedication - Al Gosling - Motion MM51.5 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32569.pdf) TE36.64 - Member Motion - Park Bench Dedication - Al Gosling - Financial Impact Statement (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32570.pdf) |
TE36.65 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 19, 20, 22, 28 |
Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services |
Recommendations |
Toronto Fire Services recommends that:
1. City Council designate as fire routes, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes, part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below:
- 83 Redpath Avenue; - 8-26 Telegram Mews and 25 Capreol Court; - 112 and 116 George Street; and - 219 Fort York Boulevard.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial implications associated with this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.65 - Staff Report - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32571.pdf) TE36.65 - Staff Report - Designation of Fire Routes - Draft By-Law (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32603.pdf) |
TE36.66 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 14 |
Temporary Traffic Controls and Lane Closure - Lake Shore Boulevard West |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Prohibit left-turns, from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday by eastbound traffic on Lake Shore Boulevard West at Jameson Avenue (temporary south intersection).
2. Prohibit straight-through movement at all times by southbound traffic on Jameson Avenue at Lake Shore Boulevard West (temporary south intersection), from August 20, 2010 to September 6, 2010, inclusive.
3. Prohibit straight-through movement at all times by northbound traffic from the Marilynn Bell Park exit at Lake Shore Boulevard West (temporary south intersection), from August 20, 2010 to September 6, 2010, inclusive.
4. Prohibit left-turns at all times by northbound traffic on Jameson Avenue at the westbound entrance ramp onto the F.G. Gardiner Expressway.
5. Prohibit U-turns at all times by northbound traffic on Jameson Avenue, between Springhurst Avenue and King Street West.
6. Prohibit left-turns at all times by eastbound traffic on Lake Shore Boulevard West at British Columbia Road to the eastbound F. G. Gardiner Expressway entrance ramp.
7. Prohibit U-turns at all times by eastbound traffic on Lake Shore Boulevard West to westbound Lake Shore Boulevard West at British Columbia Road.
8. Approve the temporary closure of the eastbound left-turn lane on Lake Shore Boulevard West at British Columbia Road, generally as shown on the print of Drawing No. 421G-0094, dated July, 2010, attached to the report dated July 21, 2010, entitled “Temporary Turn Prohibitions and Lane Closure – Lake Shore Boulevard West”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
9. Rescind the “Prohibited Entry, from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation at the westbound entrance ramp to the F. G. Gardiner Expressway from westbound Lake Shore Boulevard West at Jameson Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to introduce several temporary regulatory changes on Lake Shore Boulevard West and on Jameson Avenue during the rehabilitation of three bridges crossing the F.G. Gardiner Expressway in the western waterfront area.
Staff propose: an eastbound left-turn prohibition on Lake Shore Boulevard West at Jameson Avenue; a northbound and southbound straight-through prohibition on Jameson Avenue at the temporary entrance/exit to Marilynn Bell Park at Lake Shore Boulevard West for the duration of the 2010 Canadian National Exhibition; a northbound left-turn prohibition on Jameson Avenue to the westbound F.G. Gardiner entrance ramp; a northbound U-turn prohibition on Jameson Avenue, north of Springhurst Avenue; an eastbound left-turn prohibition on Lake Shore Boulevard West to the eastbound F. G. Gardiner entrance ramp at British Columbia Road; an eastbound U-turn prohibition from eastbound Lake Shore Boulevard West onto westbound Lake Shore Boulevard West at British Columbia Road; and rescission of the prohibited entry regulation during the afternoon rush period to the F. G. Gardiner entrance ramp from westbound Lake Shore Boulevard West at Jameson Avenue.
These temporary traffic control measures will improve traffic operation by reducing operational conflicts and traffic congestion at the signalized intersections on Lake Shore Boulevard West and on Jameson Avenue for the duration of the construction period. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost for installing the various required signs and lane closure is $2,000.00, funds for which are available in the Transportation Services 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.66 - Staff Report - Lake Shore Boulevard West - Temporary Traffic Controls (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32572.pdf) TE36.66 - Staff Report - Lake Shore Boulevard West - Drawing No. 421G-0094 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32573.pdf) TE36.66 - Staff Report - Lake Shore Boulevard West - Drawing No. 421G-0095 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32574.pdf) TE36.66 - Staff Report - Lake Shore Boulevard West - Drawing No. 421G-0096 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32575.pdf) |
TE36.67 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Curb Lane and Sidewalk Closure - Stafford Street |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the closure of the east sidewalk and the east curb lane on Stafford Street, between a point 38 metres south of King Street West and a point 27 metres further south, from August 1, 2010, to May 31, 2011, as shown on the print of Drawing No. 421G-0119 attached to the report dated July 27, 2010, entitled “Curb Lane and Sidewalk Closure – Stafford Street”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. Rescind the 2 hour maximum parking regulation on the east side of Stafford Street, between Wellington Street West and King Street West.
3. Restrict parking to a maximum of 2 hours at all times on:
a. the east side of Stafford Street from King Street West to a point 28 metres south; and
b. the east side of Stafford Street from Wellington Street West to a point 44 metres north.
4. Prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Stafford Street from a point 28 metres south of King Street West to a point 65 metres further south.
5. Authorize Transportation Services to submit the necessary Bills to revert Stafford Street to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the construction project is completed. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Toronto and East York Community Council has the delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Harhay Construction Management Limited is building a 10-storey condominium on the east side of Stafford Street between King Street West and Wellington Street West (No. 25 Stafford Street). To enable construction of this development it is necessary to close the east sidewalk and the east curb lane on Stafford Street for a period of 10 months. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact on the City. Harhay Construction Management Limited will bear the costs. |
Background Information |
TE36.67 - Staff Report - Stafford Street - Curb Lane and Sidewalk Closure (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32576.pdf) TE36.67 - Staff Report - Stafford Street - Drawing No. 421G-0119 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32577.pdf) |
TE36.68 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Sidewalk and Partial Lane Closure - Bathurst Street |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the closure of the east sidewalk and narrowing of the east curb lane on Bathurst Street, from a point 20.5 metres north of King Street West to a point 42.5 metres further north, from August 1, 2010, to Feb 29, 2012, as shown on the print of Drawing No. 421G-0125 attached to the report dated July 28, 2010, entitled “Sidewalk and Partial Lane Closure – Bathurst Street”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. In conjunction with Recommendation 1 above, City Council approve the following amendments to parking regulations:
a. Rescind the “No Parking 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday except Public Holidays” regulation on the east side of Bathurst Street between Front Street West and a point 30.5 metres north of King Street West.
b. Rescind the “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the east side of Bathurst Street from a point 30.5 metres north of King Street West to a point 27.5 metres further north.
c. Implement a “No Parking 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday except Public Holidays” regulation on the east side of Bathurst Street, from Front Street West to King Street West.
d. Implement a “No Stopping Anytime” regulation on the east side of Bathurst Street, from King Street West to a point 58.0 metres north.
3. City Council authorize Transportation Services to submit the necessary Bills to revert Bathurst Street to its pre-construction lane configuration and parking regulations when the construction project is completed. |
Summary |
Tucker Hi-Rise Construction Incorporated is building a two-tower (sixteen and ten-storey) condominium at 650 King Street West, on the north side of King Street West between Bathurst Street and Portland Street and flanking on the east side of Bathurst Street between King Street West and Adelaide Street West. To enable construction of this development it is necessary to close a section of the east sidewalk and narrow the east curb lane of Bathurst Street, from a point 20.5 metres north of King Street West to a point 42.5 metres further north for a period of 19 months. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact on the City. Tucker Hi-Rise Construction Incorporated will bear the costs. |
Background Information |
TE36.68 - Staff Report - Bathurst Street - Sidewalk and Partial Lane Closure (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32578.pdf) TE36.68 - Staff Report - Bathurst Street - Drawing No. 421G-0125 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32579.pdf) |
TE36.69 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Curb Lane and Sidewalk Closure - Charlotte Street |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the closure of the west sidewalk and curb lane of Charlotte Street, from a point 9.5 metres north of King Street West to a point 42.4 metres further north, from August 1, 2010, to December 31, 2011, as shown on the print of Drawing No. 421F-9829 attached to the report dated July 27, 2010, entitled “Curb Lane and Sidewalk Closure – Charlotte Street”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize Transportation Services to revert Charlotte Street to its pre-construction condition when the construction project is completed. |
Summary |
Tucker Hi-Rise Construction Incorporated is building a 36-storey condominium at No. 430 King Street West (northwest corner of King Street West and Charlotte Street). To enable construction of this development it is necessary to close the west sidewalk and curb lane on a section of the west side of Charlotte Street, north of King Street West for a period of 17 months. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact on the City. Tucker Hi-Rise Construction Incorporated will bear the costs. |
Background Information |
TE36.69 - Staff Report - Charlotte Street - Curb Lane and Sidewalk Closure (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32580.pdf) TE36.69 - Staff Report - Charlotte Street - Drawing No. 421G-9829 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32581.pdf) |
TE36.70 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 27 |
Lay-By Construction - Fronting 50-60 Yorkville Avenue (Four Seasons Hotel and Private Residences) |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council not authorize the construction of a lay-by fronting 50-60 Yorkville Avenue (Four Seasons Hotel and Private Residences). |
Summary |
Transportation Services has been requested by Councillor Kyle Rae to report on construction of a lay-by fronting 50-60 Yorkville Avenue (Four Seasons Hotel and Private Residences). The construction of the lay-by is not recommended at this time. |
Financial Impact |
Adoption of the above-noted recommendation has no financial impact. |
Background Information |
TE36.70 - Staff Report - 50-60 Yorkville Avenue - Lay-By Construction (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32582.pdf) TE36.70 - Staff Report - 50-60 Yorkville Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0118 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32583.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 10, 2010) Letter from Ron Palmer, PPUD Committee Chair, Bloor-Yorkville BIA (TE.New.TE36.70.1) |
TE36.71 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Lay-By Construction - Regent Street |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the widening of Regent Street, for the construction of a 2.4-metre-wide lay-by on the west side of Regent Street, from a point 145.3 metres north of Shuter Street to a point 21.5m metres further north, generally as shown on the attached print of Drawing No. 421G-0122, dated July 2010, attached to the report dated July 28, 2010, entitled “Lay-By Construction – Regent Street”, from the Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. Approve the following changes to parking regulations in conjunction with construction of the lay-by:
a. rescind the “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the west side of Regent Street, between 96.5 metres north of Shuter Street and Dundas Street East;
b. prohibit parking, at all times, on the west side of Regent Street, between 96.5 metres north of Shuter Street and a point 44.2 metres further north;
c. rescind the “No Standing Anytime” regulation on the west side of Regent Street, between Dundas Street East and a point opposite the north curb line of St. David’s Walk;
d. prohibit standing, at all times, on the west side of Regent Street, between a point 140.7 metres north of Shuter Street and a point 4.6 metres further north, and between a point 166.8 metres north of Shuter Street and Dundas Street East;
e. restrict parking to a maximum period of 10 minutes from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Regent Street, between a point 145.3 metres north of Shuter Street and a point 21.5 metres further north; and
f. prohibit standing from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 a.m., Monday to Friday and anytime on Saturday and Sunday on the west side of Regent Street, between a point 145.3 metres north of Shuter Street and a point 21.5 metres further north. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval from Toronto and East York Community Council for a road alteration by-law to construct a lay-by on the west side of Regent Street, for a new infant daycare.
The proposed lay-by will provide three short-term parking spaces to allow for pick-up/drop-off at the daycare. |
Financial Impact |
All costs associated with the construction of the lay-by and changes to signs regulating parking, would be the responsibility of the property owner (Toronto Community Housing). |
Background Information |
TE36.71 - Staff Report - Regent Street - Lay-By Construction (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32584.pdf) TE36.71 - Staff Report - Regent Street - Drawing No. 421G-0122 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32585.pdf) |
TE36.72 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 14 |
Road Alteration – King Street West, West of Wilson Park Road |
Origin |
(July 9, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the narrowing of King Street West, from a width of 21.2 metres to a width ranging between 14.7 metres and 18.7 metres by realigning the north curb from Wilson Park Road to a point about 30 metres west, generally as shown on the attached print of Drawing No. 421G-0065, dated June 2010, attached to the report dated July 9, 2010, entitled “Road Alteration – King Street West, west of Wilson Park Road”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to narrow the north side of King Street West, on the west side of Wilson Park Road, for the purpose of realigning the curb to provide a safer crossing environment for pedestrians crossing the intersection.
The proposal is to narrow the north side of King Street West, from a width of 21.2 metres to a width of 14.7 metres on the north side of King Street West, from Wilson Park Road to a point 30 metres further west.
This initiative will be undertaken as part of the TTC street-car track allowance replacement scheduled in September, 2010, between Queen Street West and Close Avenue. |
Financial Impact |
Funding for this road alteration in the estimated amount of $35,000.00 is available within Transportation Services Capital Program under Project No.10TSP-06RD. |
Background Information |
TE36.72 - Staff Report - King Street West West of Wilson Park - Road Alteration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32588.pdf) TE36.72 - Staff Report - King Street West West of Wilson Park - Drawing No. 421G-0065 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32589.pdf) |
TE36.73 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 18 |
Road Alteration - Dufferin Street, North of Bloor Street West |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the widening of Dufferin Street, from a width varying between 17 and 19 metres to a width ranging between 19.15 and 19.7 metres by narrowing the sidewalk on west side, from Bloor Street West to a point 47.1 metres north and on the east side, from Bloor Street West to a point 44.1 metres north, generally as shown on the attached print of Drawing No. 421G-0116, dated July, 2010, attached to the report dated July 21, 2010, entitled “Road Alteration – Dufferin Street, north of Bloor Street West”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to widen the east and west sides of Dufferin Street, north of Bloor Street West, for the purpose of providing a longer taper and wider curb lane for TTC buses picking-up/dropping-off passengers at Dufferin Subway Station.
The proposal is to widen Dufferin Street, from a width varying between 17 and 19 metres to a width ranging between 19.15 to 19.7 metres by narrowing the sidewalk on the west side of Dufferin Street, from Bloor Street West to a point 47.1 metres further north; and on the east side of Dufferin Street, from Bloor Street West to a point 44.1 metres further north. This initiative will be undertaken as part of the planned Dufferin Subway Station Improvements by TTC scheduled in 2010. |
Financial Impact |
This road alteration is part of the planned and approved improvements to the Dufferin Subway Station scheduled in 2010 by the Toronto Transit Commission. |
Background Information |
TE36.73 - Staff Report - Dufferin Street - North of Bloor Street West - Road Alteration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32591.pdf) TE36.73 - Staff Report - Dufferin Street - Drawing No. 421G-0116 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32592.pdf) |
Communications |
(August 9, 2010) Letter from Councillor Adam Giambrone, Ward 18, Davenport (TE.New.TE36.73.1) |
TE36.74 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Roadway Alteration - Bloor Street West, South Side, East of Bedford Road |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the narrowing of Bloor Street West, from a width of about 16.6 metres to a width of about 15.3 metres by the construction on a curb build-out on the south side of Bloor Street West, from a point 16.5 meters east of the east curb of Bedford Road to a point 34.5 metres further east, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421F-9255, dated July 2010, attached to the report dated July 13, 2010, entitled “Roadway Alteration – Bloor Street West, south side, east of Bedford Road”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council approve the widening of Bloor Street West, from a width of about 16.6 metres to a width of about 17.9 metres by the construction of a lay-by on the south side of Bloor Street West, from a point 51 metres east of Bedford Road to a point 70 metres further east, generally as shown on the attached print of Drawing No. 421F-9255, dated July 2010, attached to the report dated July 13, 2010, entitled “Roadway Alteration – Bloor Street West, south side, east of Bedford Road ”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
3. Contingent upon the approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 , City Council approve the following parking regulations in conjunction with construction of the build-out/lay-by:
a. Rescind the “No Stopping, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays” regulation on the south side of Bloor Street West, between Spadina Avenue and a point 143 metres west of Queens Park.
b. Rescind the parking machine regulation from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday for a maximum period of 3 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, on the south side of Bloor Street West between Spadina Avenue and a point 143 metres west of Queens Park.
c. Rescind the parking machine regulation from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday to Friday for a maximum period of 2.5 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, on the south side of Bloor Street West between Spadina Avenue and a point 143 metres west of Queens Park.
d. Approve implementation of a parking machine regulation, which operates from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, for a maximum period of 3 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, on the south side of Bloor Street West:
- from Spadina Avenue to a point 16.5 metres east of Bedford Road; and - from a point 121 metres east of Bedford Road to a point 143 metres west of Queens Park.
e. Approve implementation of a parking machine regulation, which operates from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday for a maximum period of 2.5 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, on the south side of Bloor Street West:
- from Spadina Avenue to a point 16.5 metres east of Bedford Road; and - from a point 121 metres east of Bedford Road to a point 143 metres west of Queens Park.
f. Prohibit stopping at all times, on the south side of Bloor Street West, between a point 16.5 metres east of the east curb of Bedford Road and a point 34.5 metres further east.
g. Approve implementation of a parking machine regulation, which operates from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, for a maximum period of 3 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, on the south side of Bloor Street West, from a point 51 metres east of Bedford Road to a point 35 metres further east.
h. Prohibit standing at all times, on the south side of Bloor Street West, between a point 86 metres east of Bedford Road and a point 35 metres further east.
i. Prohibit stopping from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays” on the south side of Bloor Street West:
- from Spadina Avenue to a point 16.5 east of Bedford Road; and - from a point 121 east of Bedford Road to a point 143 metres west of Queens Park. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to construct a combination curb build-out and lay-by on the south side of Bloor Street West, fronting No. 273 Bloor Street West (Royal Conservatory of Music).
Construction of this lay-by is proposed as part of Site Plan Application Nos. 03 156122 STE 202 OZ and 04110727 STE 20 SA to provide an area off the traveled portion of Bloor Street West where vehicles may stop to pick-up/drop-off patrons of the Royal Conservatory of Music.
All costs associated with the construction of the lay-by and adjustment of parking signs will be borne by the property owner (Royal Conservatory of Music). |
Financial Impact |
All costs associated with the construction of the lay-by and changes to signs regulating parking, in the estimated amount of $102,400.00, is the responsibility of the property owner (Royal Conservatory of Music). The City has received a letter of credit in the amount of $128,000.00 (representing 120% of the estimated cost). |
Background Information |
TE36.74 - Staff Report - Bloor Street West - South and East Side of Bedford Road - Roadway Alteration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32593.pdf) TE36.74 - Staff Report - Bloor Street West - Drawing No. 421G-9255 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32594.pdf) |
TE36.75 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Road Alteration – Queens Quay West, East of Eireann Quay |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the widening of the eastbound branch of Queens Quay West, from a width of 5.5 metres to a width ranging between 5.5 metres and 8.5 metres by realigning the south curb to provide a lay-by from a point about 56 metres east of Eireann Quay to a point about 26 metres further east, generally as shown on the attached print of Drawing No. 421G-0106, dated July 2010, attached to the report dated July 20, 2010, entitled “Road Alteration – Queens Quay West, east of Eireann Quay”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council rescind the redundant “No Stopping at Anytime” regulation on the south side of Queens Quay West, from Bathurst Street to a point 55 metres further east.
3. Contingent upon the approval of Recommendation 1, City Council rescind the “No Stopping at Anytime” regulation on the south side of Queens Quay West, from Bathurst Street to Lower Spadina Avenue.
4. Contingent upon the approval of Recommendation 1, City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Queens Quay West:
a. from Eireann Quay to a point 56 metres west; and b. from a point 82 metres west of Eireann Quay to Lower Spadina Avenue.
5. Contingent upon the approval of Recommendation 1, City Council prohibit standing at all times on the south side of Queens Quay West, from a point 56 metres east of Eireann Quay to a point 26 metres further east. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to widen the south side of Queens Quay West, from a point about 56 metres east of Eireann Quay to a point about 26 metres further east to provide a lay-by for persons picking up or dropping off children or other passengers attending programs at Harbourfront Community Centre and daycare centre.
The lay-by will widen the eastbound branch of Queens Quay West by about 3 metres, ranging from a width of 5.5 metres to 8.5 metres. |
Financial Impact |
The cost for this road alteration in the estimated amount of $65,000.00 is being funded by the Facilities and Real Estate Division. Funds for the Harbourfront Community Centre Lay-by Project are provided in their account No. CCA 169-01. |
Background Information |
TE36.75 - Staff Report - Queens Quay West, East of Eireann Quay - Road Alteration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32595.pdf) TE36.75 - Staff Report - Queens Quay West, East of Eireann Quay - Drawing No. 421G-0106 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32596.pdf) |
TE36.76 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Road Alteration - Richmond Street West, Between Spadina Avenue and Peter Street |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the narrowing of Richmond Street West, from a width ranging between 12.1 metres and 17.9 metres to a width ranging between 9.9 metres and 12.9 metres by installing and realigning the south curb from Spadina Avenue to Peter Street, generally as shown on the attached print of Drawing No. 421G-0115, dated July 2010, attached to the report dated July 28, 2010, entitled “Road Alteration – Richmond Street West, between Spadina Avenue and Peter Street”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to narrow the south side of Richmond Street West, between Spadina Avenue and Peter Street, for the purpose of installing a permanent sidewalk and for widening the existing sidewalks near Spadina Avenue and Peter Street. The existing 12.1-metre section would be narrowed to 9.9 metres and the existing 17.9-metre section would be narrowed to 12.9 metres. |
Financial Impact |
Funding for this road alteration in the estimated amount of $900,000.00 is available within Transportation Services Capital Program under Project No. 10TE-45RD. |
Background Information |
TE36.76 - Staff Report - Richmond Street West - Between Spadina Avenue and Peter Street - Road Alteration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32597.pdf) TE36.76 - Staff Report - Richmond Street West - Drawing No. 421G-0115 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32598.pdf) |
TE36.77 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 31 |
Road Resurfacing and Modifications - Bermondsey Road at Northline Road |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council approve the road alteration that re-aligns the roadway on Bermondsey Road at Northline Road and the installation of sidewalks, generally as shown on the copy of Drawing No. 421G-0002, attached to the report dated July 28, 2010, entitled “Road Resurfacing and Modifications – Bermondsey Road at Northline Road”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council approve reducing the existing speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Curity Avenue between O’Connor Drive and Hollinger Road, and on Hollinger Road between Curity Avenue and Bermondsey Road.
3. City Council approve an exclusive southbound right turn lane only on Bermondsey Road at Northline Road. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to alter the roadway at Bermondsey Road and Northline Road to improve the pedestrian crossing environment and the operation of the intersection. The proposed modifications include: removing two traffic islands, re-aligning the roadway on both sides of Bermondsey Road and installing sidewalks at the corners.
This road alteration will be completed in conjunction with the resurfacing of Bermondsey Road between Eglinton Avenue East and O’Connor Drive in 2010. |
Financial Impact |
The proposed modification at the intersection of Bermondsey Road and Northline Road will be included as part of the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Works Program Contract 10NY-02RD. |
Background Information |
TE36.77 - Staff Report - Bermondsey Road at Northline Road - Road Resurfacing (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32600.pdf) TE36.77 - Staff Report - Bermondsey Road - Drawing No. 421G-0089 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32601.pdf) TE36.77 - Staff Report - Bermondsey Road - Drawing No. 421G-0092 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32602.pdf) |
TE36.78 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 14, 18, 28, 30, 32 |
Installation/Removal on On-Street Parking Spaces for Persons With Disabilities - August 2010 |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council approve the installation/removal of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities at the locations identified in the Appendix A, attached to the report dated July 28, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose is to obtain approval for the installation/removal of a number of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities. |
Financial Impact |
Funds in the amount of $2,400.00 are available within Transportation Services Division’s 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.78 - Staff Report - On-Street Parking Spaces for Persons With Disabilities (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32604.pdf) |
TE36.79 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Parking Amendments – Concord Avenue |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the “One-hour maximum parking, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., from December 1st of one year to March 31st of the next following year” regulation on the east side of Concord Avenue, between Hallam Street and Northumberland Street.
2. Rescind the “One-hour maximum parking, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month, April 1st to November 30th” regulation on the east side of Concord Avenue, between Hallam Street and Northumberland Street.
3. Rescind the “One-hour maximum parking, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., from the 16th day to the last day of each month, April 1st to November 30th” regulation on the west side of Concord Avenue, between Hallam Street and Northumberland Street. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has been requested by Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone to rescind the one-hour maximum parking, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., daily regulation on Concord Avenue, between Hallam Street and Northumberland Street, which operates in conjunction with alternate side parking regulations on this section of the street. Rescinding this regulation will enable any motorist to park for up to three hours on Concord Avenue outside of the overnight permit parking period. |
Financial Impact |
Funding for the removal of signs in the estimated amount of $200.00 is available within Transportation Services 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.79 - Staff Report - Concord Avenue - Parking Amendments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32605.pdf) TE36.79 - Staff Report - Concord Avenue - Parking Amendments - Drawing No. 421G-0101 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32606.pdf) |
TE36.80 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Parking Regulations – Old Park Road |
Origin |
(July 12, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the existing “No Stopping, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation, on the west side of Old Park Road, from Ridge Hill Drive to the south limit of the C.N.R. belt line railway.
2. Approve parking for a maximum period of 15-minutes from 8:00 a.m. to 9:15 a.m., 11:15 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Old Park Road, from Ridge Hill Drive to the south limit of Elm Ridge Circle.
3. Prohibit stopping from 9:15 a.m. to 11:15 a.m., 1:15 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., and from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Old Park Road, from Ridge Hill Drive to the south limit of Elm Ridge Circle.
4. Rescind the existing “No Parking at Anytime” regulation on the west side of Old Park Road, from Eglinton Avenue West to Elm Ridge Circle.
5. Prohibit parking at anytime on the west side of Old Park Road, from Eglinton Avenue West to Ridge Hill Drive. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting authority to delineate a “Student Pick-up and Drop-off Zone”, with parking allowed for a maximum period of 15 minutes at times when students are being picked up or dropped off at West Preparatory School (No. 70 Ridge Hill Drive), on the west side of Old Park Road, between Elm Ridge Circle and Ridge Hill Drive.
This will provide parents/guardians with the opportunity to park their vehicles for a short period of time to escort their child to or from the school. |
Financial Impact |
The cost of installing signs to implement the proposed regulatory changes is about $800.00. These funds are available within the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.80 - Staff Report - Old Park Road - Parking Regulations (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32612.pdf) TE36.80 - Staff Report - Old Park Road - Parking Regulations - Drawing No. 421G-0078 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32613.pdf) |
TE36.81 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Maximum Parking Restriction – Holly Street |
Origin |
(July 2, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the ‘No Standing Anytime’ regulation on the west side of Holly Street, from Soudan Avenue to Eglinton Avenue East.
2. Implement a “15-minute maximum parking, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation on the west side of Holly Street, from a point 78.5 metres north of Soudan Avenue to a point 30.5 metres further north.
3. Prohibit standing, from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m., Monday to Friday and at anytime Saturday and Sunday, on the west side of Holly Street, from a point 78.5 metres north of Soudan Avenue to a point 30.5 metres further north.
4. Prohibit standing at anytime on the west side of Holly Street, from Soudan Avenue to a point 78.5 metres north and from a point 109 metres north of Soudan Avenue to Eglinton Avenue East. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to designate a 15-minute maximum parking restriction on a section of the west side of Holly Street, fronting the Holly Street Endoscopy Clinic, located at Premises No. 40 Holly Street. This parking restriction would operate from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday and potentially provide short-term parking opportunity for persons escorting patients to/from appointments at the clinic. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost of installing the signs necessary to identify the amended parking regulations is about $500. These funds are available within the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.81 - Staff Report - Holly Street - Maximum Parking Restriction (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32614.pdf) TE36.81 - Staff Report - Holly Street - Maximum Parking - Drawing No. 421G-0075 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32615.pdf) |
TE36.82 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Proposed Parking Amendment - Foster Place |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the current “No Parking Anytime” prohibition on the north side of Foster Place, from Elizabeth Street to its easterly terminus.
2. Prohibit standing at all times on the north side of Foster Place, from Elizabeth Street to its easterly terminus. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval from Toronto and East York Community Council to introduce a “No Standing Anytime” prohibition on the north side of Foster Place from Elizabeth Street to its easterly terminus. |
Financial Impact |
Funds in the amount of $500.00 are available in the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.82 - Staff Report - Foster Place - Proposed Parking Amendment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32616.pdf) TE36.82 - Staff Report - Foster Place - Drawing No. 421G-0120 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32617.pdf) |
TE36.83 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Proposed Parking Amendment - Marlborough Avenue Between Marlborough Place and Yonge Street |
Origin |
(July 26, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the current “No Parking Anytime” prohibition on the north side of Marlborough Avenue from Yonge Street to a point 310 metres west of the west street line of Yonge Street.
2. Prohibit standing at all times on the north side of Marlborough Avenue from Yonge Street to a point 319 metres further west. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval from Toronto and East York Community Council to introduce a “No Standing Anytime” regulation on the north side of Marlborough Avenue from Marlborough Place to Yonge Street to deter illegal parking and enhance traffic operation on this street. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost of installing signs to give effect to this proposal is $1000.00, funds for which are available in Transportation Services 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.83 - Staff Report - Marlborough Avenue - Parking Amendment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32618.pdf) TE36.83 - Staff Report - Marlborough Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0123 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32619.pdf) |
TE36.84 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Parking Regulations - McGill Street |
Origin |
(July 27, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the “No Standing Anytime” regulation on the north side of McGill Street, from Church Street to a point 31 metres east of Yonge Street.
2. Prohibit parking at all times on the north side of McGill Street from Church Street to a point 83 metres west.
3. Prohibit standing at all times on the north side of McGill Street from a point 83 metres west of Church Street to Sheard Street. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval from Toronto and East York Community Council to introduce a “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the north side of McGill Street, from Church Street to a point 83 metres west to help facilitate loading and unloading opportunity for area residents. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost for installing the various required signs is $500.00, funds for which are available in the Transportation Services 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.84 - Staff Report - McGill Street - Parking Regulations (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32620.pdf) TE36.84 - Staff Report - McGill Street - Drawing No. 421G-0124 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32621.pdf) |
TE36.85 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27, 28 |
Pay and Display Parking - Various Streets in Wards 27 and 28 |
Origin |
(July 16, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the parking regulations outlined in Appendix “A”, attached to the report dated July 16, 2010, “Pay and Display Parking – various Streets in Wards 27 and 28”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, stipulating the removal of the current one hour regulation and amendments to other parking regulation on Earl Place, Earl Street, Huntley Street, Isabella Street, Linden Street, Maitland Place and Howard Street.
2. Approve implementation of the parking regulations outlined in Appendix “B”, attached to the report dated July 16, 2010, “Pay and Display Parking – various Streets in Wards 27 and 28”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to authorize the operation of parking machines on Earl Place, Earl Street, Huntley Street, Isabella Street, Linden Street, Maitland Place and Howard Street. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has been requested by the Toronto Parking Authority to report on amending the parking regulations on the following streets in order to regain some paid parking in the area which was lost with the implementation of bike lanes on Jarvis Street:
- Earl Place, between Huntley Street and Jarvis Street - Earl Street, between Huntley Street and Sherbourne Street - Huntley Street, between Selby Street and Isabella Street - Isabella Street, between Jarvis Street and Sherbourne Street - Linden Street, between Huntley Street and Sherbourne Street - Maitland Place, between Homewood Avenue and Jarvis Street - Howard Street, between Sherbourne Street and Parliament Street |
Financial Impact |
The Toronto Parking Authority advises that the funds required to install pay-and-display parking machines and related signage on the proposed streets are available in the Toronto Parking Authority 2010 Pay-and-Display Machine Installation Program. |
Background Information |
TE36.85 - Staff Report - Pay and Display Parking - Various Streets in Wards 27 and 28 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32623.pdf) TE36.85 - Staff Report - Revised - Pay and Display Parking - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32624.pdf) TE36.85 - Staff Report - Revised - Pay and Display Parking - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32625.pdf) TE36.85 - Staff Report - Pay and Display Parking - Various Streets in Wards 27 and 28 - Drawing No. 421G-0117 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32626.pdf) |
TE36.86 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
Alternate Side Parking - Parkmount Road |
Origin |
(July 14, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the alternate side parking regulations and allow parking only on the east side of Parkmount Road between the public lane south of Danforth Avenue and Felstead Avenue/Hanson Street by amending Chapters 400 and 925 of the Toronto Municipal Code as outlined in Appendix A and Appendix B attached to the report dated July 14, 2010, entitled “Alternate side parking – Parkmount Road”, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is seeking authority to rescind the alternate side parking regulations on Parkmount Road between the public lane south of Danforth Avenue and Felstead Avenue/Hanson Street to allow parking only on the east side of the street in order to increase the on-street parking availability for area residents.
The amendment would have a negligible impact on traffic operations; however, regular street cleaning of the east side of the road would be more difficult and less frequent. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost of removing signs and installing new ones is $2500.00. Funds have been allocated in the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Alternate Side Parking (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32627.pdf) TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32628.pdf) TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32629.pdf) TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Drawing No. 421G-0099 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32630.pdf) TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Drawing No. 421G-0109 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32631.pdf) TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Drawing No. 421G-0110 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32632.pdf) TE36.86 - Staff Report - Parkmount Road - Drawing No. 421G-0111 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32633.pdf) |
TE36.87 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 31, 32 |
Pay-and-Display Parking - Danforth Avenue, Between Sibley Avenue and Thyra Avenue |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council introduce pay-and-display parking regulations on the south side of Danforth Avenue, from a point 30.5 metres east of Sibley Avenue to a point 30.5 metres west of Thyra Avenue, to operate from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday; for a maximum duration of 3 hours at a rate of $1.50 per hour.
2. City Council rescind the “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the south side of Danforth Avenue, between Sibley Avenue and Thyra Avenue.
3. City Council rescind the “1-Hour Parking, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.” regulation on the south side of Danforth Avenue, between Trent Avenue and the east limit of the City of Toronto. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to introduce pay-and-display parking regulations on the south side of Danforth Avenue, from a point 30.5 metres east of Sibley Avenue to a point 30.5 metres west of Thyra Avenue. Parking is currently prohibited in this area. This would have a minimal impact on traffic operations. |
Financial Impact |
The Toronto Parking Authority advises that the cost of installing pay-and-display parking machines and related signage is $34,000. These funds are available in the Toronto Parking Authority 2010 Pay-and-Display Machine Installation Program. |
Background Information |
TE36.87 - Staff Report - Danforth Avenue, Between Sibley and Thyra Avenues - Pay and Display Parking (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32634.pdf) TE36.87 - Staff Report - Danforth Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0098 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32635.pdf) |
TE36.88 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 22 |
Stopping Prohibition – St. Clair Avenue East |
Origin |
(July 2, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the “No Parking, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., except Saturdays, Sundays and Public Holidays” regulation on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, from Mount Pleasant Road to Ferndale Avenue.
2. City Council rescind the “No Parking, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., daily” regulation on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, from Avoca Avenue to a point 30.5 metres east of Ferndale Avenue.
3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, from Ferndale Avenue to a point 30.5 metres east.
4. City Council prohibit parking, from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily, on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, from a point 30.5 metres east of Ferndale Avenue to Avoca Avenue.
5. City Council prohibit parking, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., except Saturdays, Sundays and Public Holidays on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, from Avoca Avenue to Mount Pleasant Road. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to implement a “No Stopping Anytime” regulation on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, from Ferndale Avenue, to a point 30.5 metres east thereof.
The implementation of a “No Stopping Anytime” regulation will deter drivers from parking illegally on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, east of Ferndale Avenue, in the vicinity of the signalized intersection. This regulation will improve visibility for motorists exiting Ferndale Avenue, reduce traffic congestion, and potentially improve westbound traffic flow on this section of St. Clair Avenue East. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost of installing the signs necessary to identify the amended parking regulations is about $400. Funds are available within the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.88 - Staff Report - St. Clair Avenue East - Stopping Prohibition (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32636.pdf) TE36.88 - Staff Report - St. Clair Avenue East - Drawing No. 421G-0074 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32637.pdf) |
TE36.89 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20 |
Proposed Passenger Loading Zone and Conversion of Public Lane to One-Way Westbound Operation - 326, 358 King Street West |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit standing at all times on the north side of King Street West from a point 29 metres west of John Street to a point 54 metres further west.
2. City Council authorize the conversion of the public lane, first north of King Street West extending between John Street and Widmer Street to one-way westbound operation. |
Summary |
Transportation Services has evaluated a request from Daniels HR Corporation on behalf of the owner of Bell Lightbox, 326, 358 King Street West, to provide loading opportunities for motor coaches and to convert the operation of the public lane, north of King Street West, extending between John Street and Widmer Street to one-way westbound operation.
The designation of an on-street loading zone on the north side of King Street West will provide loading/unloading opportunities for patrons and will not adversely impact traffic or pedestrian operations on this section of King Street West. The conversion of the operation of the public lane to one-way westbound operation will facilitate a “staging area” for motor coaches during major events while they wait for space to become available on King Street West, within the motor coach loading area. |
Financial Impact |
All costs associated with installation of the signage, will be the responsibility of the property owner.
In 2004, as a condition of development approval, an arrangement was brokered by then Councillor Olivia Chow to waive the customary compensation for loss of parking revenue in return for the creation of "a fund to facilitate the use of space within the TIFF portion of the building for the purposes of non-profit cultural or institutional uses". The executed Section 37 agreement provides that funds in the amount of $300,000.00 be provided for this purpose. We have confirmed that those funds have been secured.
All costs associated with the conversion of the public lane to one-way westbound operation will be the responsibility of the property owner. |
Background Information |
TE36.89 - Staff Report - 326, 258 King Street West - Loading Zone and Public Lane (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32638.pdf) TE36.89 - Staff Report - 326, 358 King Street West - Drawing No. 421G-0090 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32639.pdf) |
TE36.90 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 30 |
School Bus Loading Zone - 701 Gerrard Street East |
Origin |
(June 16, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council introduce a school bus loading zone on the south side of Gerrard Street East between a point 12 metres east of Boulton Avenue and a point 8 metres further east operating 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except July and August.
2. City Council rescind the pay-and-display parking regulations on the south side of Gerrard Street East between a point 177 metres east of Broadview Avenue and De Grassi Street operating from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday.
3. City Council implement pay-and-display parking regulations on the south side of Gerrard Street East between a point 177 metres east of Broadview Avenue and Boulton Avenue and a point 20 metres east of Boulton Avenue and De Grassi Street, operating from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to establish a school bus loading zone in front of Eastdale Collegiate on the south side of Gerrard Street East between Boulton Avenue and De Grassi Street. The loading zone will facilitate curb side access for school buses during peak arrival and dismissal times. Traffic operations and TTC streetcar service along Gerrard Street East will not be negatively impacted by the installation, however the installation will result in the loss of pay-and-display parking revenue. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost of installing signs and poles is $500.00. Funds have been allocated in the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget.
The Toronto Parking Authority estimates the loss of revenue associated with the loss of parking in connection with the installation of the school bus loading to be approximately $5,500.00 annually. |
Background Information |
TE36.90 - Staff Report - 701 Gerrard Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32640.pdf) TE36.90 - Staff Report - 701 Gerrard Street East - Drawing No. 421G-0068 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32641.pdf) |
(Deferred from March 9, 2010 - 2010.TE32.33) |
TE36.91 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 30 |
Standing Prohibition - 955 Queen Street East |
Origin |
(February 11, 2010) Report from Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that::
1. City Council prohibit standing from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Queen Street East between a point 60 metres east of Carlaw Avenue and a point 3 metres further east. |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to implement a “No Standing 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation fronting a wheelchair ramp located at the main entrance to the South Riverdale Community Health Centre at No. 955 Queen Street East located in the vicinity of Carlaw Avenue.
The standing prohibition will deter vehicles from parking in front of the ramp and will have minimal impact to on-street parking during the daytime. |
Financial Impact | ||||||
|
||||||
Background Information |
TE36.91 - Staff Report - 955 Queen Street East - Standing Prohibition (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32215.pdf) TE36.91 - Staff Report - 955 Queen Street East - Drawing No. 421F-9948 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32216.pdf) |
TE36.92 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 30 |
Left Turn Prohibition - Eastern Avenue at Lewis Street |
Origin |
(July 14, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit eastbound left turns from Eastern Avenue to Lewis Street between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., except Saturday, Sunday, and public holidays (bicycles excepted). |
Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to prohibit eastbound left turns from Eastern Avenue to Lewis Street between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, in order to reduce non-resident traffic infiltration.
The eastbound left-turn prohibition will reduce non-resident traffic on Lewis Street during the weekday afternoon peak period. Lewis Street residents and customers of area businesses, may need to take alternate routes during that time period. An increase in traffic volume on adjacent northbound streets could be expected as a result of the turn prohibition.
Cyclists and TTC bus service will not be negatively impacted. |
Financial Impact |
The estimated cost of installing a sign and pole is $300.00. Funds have been allocated in the Transportation Services Division 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.92 - Staff Report - Eastern Avenue at Lewis Street - Left Turn Prohibition (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32642.pdf) TE36.92 - Staff Report - Eastern Avenue at Lewis Street - Drawing No. 421G-0100 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32643.pdf) |
TE36.93 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Two-Way Operation – Euclid Avenue, South of Ulster Street |
Origin |
(July 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescind the one-way northbound regulation on Euclid Avenue, from Queen Street West to Bloor Street West.
2. Rescind the one-way northbound regulation on Euclid Avenue, from the first lane north of College Street to Follis Avenue.
3. Rescind the one-way northbound operation on Euclid Avenue, from Harbord Street to Herrick Street.
4. Approve implementation of a one-way northbound regulation on Euclid Avenue, from the first lane north of College Street to the first lane south of Ulster Street.
5. Approve implementation of a one-way northbound regulation on Euclid Avenue, from Ulster Street to Bloor Street West.
6. Approve the prohibition of parking at all times on the east side of Euclid Avenue, between a point 42.6 metres south of Ulster Street and a point 18.5 metres further south. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has been requested by Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone to convert the section of Euclid Avenue, between Ulster Street and the first lane south, from one-way northbound to two-way operation. The proposed change is recommended and is intended to provide local residents with improved access. |
Financial Impact |
Funding for the installation of signs and pavement markings in the estimated amount of $800.00 is available within Transportation Services 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.93 - Staff Report - Euclid Avenue - South of Ulster Street - Two-Way Operation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32644.pdf) TE36.93 - Staff Report - Euclid Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0088 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32645.pdf) |
TE36.94 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 31 |
Reduce Speed Limit to 40 Kilometres Per Hour - Squires Avenue, Between Tiago Avenue and Holmstead Avenue |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve implementation of a 40 km/h maximum speed limit on Squires Avenue, between Tiago Avenue and Holmstead Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. Transportation Services staff have investigated reducing the maximum speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Squires Avenue, between Tiago Avenue and Holmstead Avenue.
Based on an assessment of the speed profile and neighbourhood environment, Squires Avenue, between Tiago Avenue and Holmstead Avenue, satisfies the warrants for reducing the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h. Implementing this lower speed limit is recommended to promote lower operating speeds and provide a safer environment for all road users. |
Financial Impact |
Funding for the installation of signs in the estimated amount of $1000.00 to give effect to this regulation is available within Transportation Services 2010 Operating Budget. |
Background Information |
TE36.94 - Staff Report - Squires Avenue - Reduce Speed Limit (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32646.pdf) TE36.94 - Staff Report - Squires Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0121 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32647.pdf) |
TE36.95 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
All-Way Stop Control – Intersections of Dixon Avenue with Brookmount Road and Rainsford Road |
Origin |
(July 9, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Not install stop signs for eastbound traffic on Dixon Avenue at Brookmount Road and at Rainsford Road. |
Summary |
This report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has been requested by Councillor Sandra Bussin to report to Toronto and East York Community Council on implementing all-way stop control at the intersections of Dixon Avenue with Brookmount Road and Rainsford Road.
The results of traffic studies undertaken at both intersections indicate that the installation criteria for all-way stop control have not been satisfied. |
Financial Impact |
There are no financial impacts associated with this report. Should Toronto and East York Community Council decide that the intersections of Dixon Avenue with Brookmount |
Background Information |
TE36.95 - Staff Report - All-Way Stop Control - Intersections of Dixon Avenue with Brookmount Road and Rainsford Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32648.pdf) TE36.95 - Staff Report - All-Way Stop Control - Dixon - Drawing No. 421G-0077 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32649.pdf) |
TE36.96 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 20 |
Traffic Calming - Eireann Quay |
Origin |
(July 26, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Not authorize installation of speed humps on Eireann Quay, between Queens Quay West and the south end of Eireann Quay. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has investigated installing speed humps on Eireann Quay, between Queens Quay West and the south end of Eireann Quay, to address concerns regarding the speed of traffic.
Staff’s assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been met, therefore, installation of speed humps on Eireann Quay is not recommended. |
Financial Impact |
The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact. If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Eireann Quay, between Queens Quay West and the south end of Eireann Quay would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:
1. The estimated cost for installing 2 speed humps would be $6,000.00. Funds in the amount of $418,000.00 have been provided in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives. Installing speed humps on Eireann Quay is subject to competing priorities and funding availability. |
Background Information |
TE36.96 - Staff Report - Eireann Quay - Traffic Calming (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32650.pdf) TE36.96 - Staff Report - Eireann Quay - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32651.pdf) TE36.96 - Staff Report - Eireann Quay - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32652.pdf) TE36.96 - Staff Report - Eireann Quay - Drawing No. 421G-0105 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32653.pdf) |
TE36.97 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Traffic Calming – Benson Avenue |
Origin |
(July 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Not authorize installation of speed humps on Benson Avenue, between Winona Drive and Greensides Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has investigated installing speed humps on Benson Avenue, between Winona Drive and Greensides Avenue, to address residents’ concerns with the speed of traffic.
Staff’s assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been met, therefore, installation of speed humps on Benson Avenue is not recommended. |
Financial Impact |
The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact. If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Benson Avenue, between Winona Drive and Greensides Avenue, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:
1. The estimated cost for installing two speed humps would be $6,000.00. Funds in the amount of $480,000 are contained in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives. Installing speed humps on Benson Avenue is subject to competing priorities and funding availability. |
Background Information |
TE36.97 - Staff Report - Benson Avenue - Traffic Calming (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32654.pdf) TE36.97 - Staff Report - Benson Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0091 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32655.pdf) TE36.97 - Staff Report - Benson Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32669.pdf) |
TE36.98 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Traffic Calming – Tyrrel Avenue |
Origin |
(July 12, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Not authorize installation of speed humps on Tyrrel Avenue, between Wychwood Avenue and Christie Street. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has investigated installing speed humps on Tyrrel Avenue, between Wychwood Avenue and Christie Street to address residents’ concerns with the speed of traffic.
Staff’s assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been met. Therefore, installation of speed humps on Tyrrel Avenue is not recommended. |
Financial Impact |
The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact. If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Tyrrel Avenue, between Wychwood Avenue and Christie Street, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:
1. The estimated cost for installing two speed humps would be $6,000.00. Funds in the amount of $480,000 are contained in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives. Installing speed humps on Tyrrel Avenue is subject to competing priorities and funding availability. |
Background Information |
TE36.98 - Staff Report - Tyrrel Avenue - Traffic Calming (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32656.pdf) TE36.98 - Staff Report - Tyrrel Avenue - Traffic Calming - Drawing No. 421G-0087 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32657.pdf) |
TE36.99 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Traffic Calming - Beech Avenue, Between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue |
Origin |
(July 13, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends to Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. Traffic calming not be installed on Beech Avenue, between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services staff have reviewed the need for traffic calming on Beech Avenue, between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue. Our assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the traffic calming policy has not been satisfied; therefore, speed humps should not be installed on Beech Avenue at this time. |
Financial Impact |
The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact. If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Beech Avenue, between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:
1. The estimated cost for installing four speed humps would be $12,000.00. Funds in the amount of $418,000.00 have been allocated in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives. Installing speed humps on Beech Avenue would be subject to competing priorities and funding availability. |
Background Information |
TE36.99 - Staff Report - Beech Avenue, Between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue - Traffic Calming (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32658.pdf) TE36.99 - Staff Report - Beech Avenue - Drawing No. 421G-0097 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32670.pdf) TE36.99 - Staff Report - Beech Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32659.pdf) |
TE36.100 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Traffic Calming - Willow Avenue, Between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends to Toronto and East York Community Council that:
1. Traffic calming not be installed on Willow Avenue, between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services staff have reviewed the need for traffic calming on Willow Avenue, between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue. Our assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the traffic calming policy has not been satisfied; therefore, speed humps should not be installed on Willow Avenue at this time. |
Financial Impact |
The adoption of the above-noted recommendation will not result in any financial impact. If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides speed humps on Willow Avenue, between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue, would be beneficial, the following financial impact will result:
1. The estimated cost for installing four speed humps would be $12,000.00. Funds in the amount of $418,000.00 have been allocated in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives. Installing speed humps on Willow Avenue would be subject to competing priorities and funding availability. |
Background Information |
TE36.100 - Staff Report - Willow Avenue - Between Queen Street East and Pine Avenue - Traffic Calming (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32661.pdf) TE36.100 - Staff Report - Willow Avenue - Drawing 421G-0108 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32662.pdf) TE36.100 - Staff Report - Willow Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32663.pdf) TE36.100 - Staff Report - Willow Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32664.pdf) |
TE36.101 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Results of Speed Hump Poll - Glenmount Park Road |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Not approve the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) on Glenmount Park Road, between Gerrard Street East and Corley Avenue. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report summarizes the results of a poll undertaken to determine resident support for installing speed humps on Glenmount Park Road, between Gerrard Street East and Corley Avenue. The poll results indicated that a majority of responses were opposed to speed humps.
It should be noted that since the poll was conducted, further discussion has taken place among residents within the southern most block, between Corley Avenue and Burgess Avenue. These residents are requesting that speed humps be installed on this section of Glenmount Park Road. |
Financial Impact |
Adopting the above-noted recommendation carries no financial impact. If, however, Toronto and East York Community Council decides to approve installing two speed humps on Glenmount Park Road, the following financial impact will result:
1. The estimated cost for installing two speed humps on Glenmount Park Road is $6,000.00. Funds in the amount of $418,000.00 have been allocated in the Transportation Services 2010 Capital Budget for traffic calming initiatives. Installing speed humps on Glenmount Park Road would be subject to competing priorities and funding availability. |
Background Information |
TE36.101 - Staff Report - Glenmount Park Road - Results of Speed Hump Poll (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32665.pdf) TE36.101 - Staff Report - Glenmount Park Road - Drawing No. 421G-0113 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32666.pdf) TE36.101 - Staff Report - Glenmount Park Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32667.pdf) TE36.101 - Staff Report - Glenmount Park Road - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32668.pdf) |
(Deferred from June 22, 2010 - 2010.TE35.84) (Deferred from May 25, 2010 - 2010.TE34.60) |
TE36.102 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 21 |
Hydrant Relocations - St. Clair Avenue West |
Origin |
(May 5, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, President, Toronto Parking Authority, Director, District Operations, Toronto Water |
Recommendations |
Staff of Toronto Water, Transportation Services and the Toronto Parking Authority recommend that:
1. In accordance with the requirements of Section 3.2.5.7 (2) of Ontario Regulation 350/06, the existing fire hydrants at Nos. 566, 596, 628, 722, and 838 St. Clair Avenue West not be relocated to create additional parking spaces. |
Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to reply to the Toronto East York Community Council Decision Document No. TE32.124 dated March 9, 2010 and specifically to report on the feasibility of relocating the existing mid-block fire hydrants along St. Clair Avenue West between Bathurst Street and Winona Drive closer to the corners so as to increase available parking spaces.
In the process of putting together this report, staff from Transportation Services, Technical Services, Toronto Water, and the Toronto Parking Authority all investigated the existing conditions along St. Clair Avenue West and provided comments on possible ways to increase available parking spaces.
The review conducted by Transportation Services concluded that the fire hydrants at Nos. 838, 722, 596, and 566 St. Clair Avenue West could potentially be relocated from their existing locations to adjacent “No Parking” zones.
The Toronto Parking Authority indicated that the relocation of the hydrants would increase the on-street inventory by one or two spaces per location. The relocation of the hydrants would not impact on the Authority’s cost or have any other operational impacts.
Field investigations conducted by Toronto Water staff revealed that this stretch of St. Clair Avenue West is serviced by eleven fire hydrants on the north side and two on the south side of the street, with horizontal spacing between hydrants presently ranging from 47.3 metres to 178.5 metres. Ontario Regulation 350/06 (Building Code Act, 1992) Section 3.2.5.7 (2) regulates the maximum spacing between fire hydrants to be 90 metres. The hydrants identified by Transportation Services for potential relocation at Nos. 566, 596, 628, 722, and 838 St. Clair Avenue West cannot be relocated to the side street intersections as the spacing would exceed the required minimum of Ontario Regulation 350/06.
Technical Services reported that the issue of relocating the existing mid-block fire hydrants to the corners was addressed in 2009, and that all the hydrants that could be moved were already moved during the TTC track reconstruction. There was one additional hydrant that was to have been installed at Arlington Avenue during the TTC track reconstruction. Due to unresolved issues at the time of construction however, the installation of the hydrant was delayed until the spring of 2010. Once this hydrant is installed, the existing 178.5 metre spacing reported by Toronto Water will be reduced. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact for this activity. |
Background Information |
TE36.102 - Staff Report - St. Clair Avenue West - Hydrant Relocations (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31755.pdf) |
TE36.103 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 20 |
Garbage Bin Enclosures - 207 Beverley Street |
Origin |
(July 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommend that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the request to install seven garbage bin enclosures within the public right of way, subject to the property owner entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, cost, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted and providing an insurance policy for such liability for the life time of the Agreement in a form as approved by the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and in an amount not less than $2,000,000 or such greater amount as the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer may require;
b. maintain the installation of the garbage bin enclosures at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Service and will not make any additions of modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain approval for associated work on private property from the Toronto Building;
d. pay for the costs of preparing and registration of the agreement on title; and
e. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachments, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare, execute and arrange to register the Encroachment Agreement on title. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owner of 207 Beverley Street to install seven garbage bin enclosures which will encroach within the public right of way on the Cecil Street flank of 207 Beverley Street.
Given the installation and ongoing maintenance of the garbage bin enclosures will not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of the encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.103 - Staff Report - 207 Beverley Street - Garbage Bin Enclosures (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32671.pdf) TE36.103 - Staff Report - 207 Beverley Street - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32672.pdf) TE36.103 - Staff Report - 207 Beverley Street - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32673.pdf) |
TE36.104 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Various Encroachments - 258 Warren Road |
Origin |
(July 28, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the ongoing maintenance of the decorative wrought iron fence surmounted by a stone retaining wall, stone pillars and glycol heating system within the driveway and private approach within the public right of way fronting 258 Warren Road, subject to the property owners entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages, and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the decorative wrought iron fence surmounted by a stone retaining wall, stone pillars and glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain approval for associated work from Toronto Building;
d. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
e. remove the encroachments upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
f. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the Encroachment Agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owners of 258 Warren Road to maintain various encroachments within the public right of way fronting 258 Warren Road. The encroachments include a 1.8 m high decorative wrought iron fence surmounted by a stone retaining wall, stone pillars and a glycol heating system within the driveway and private approach.
Although the decorative wrought iron fence surmounted by a stone retaining wall and stone pillars exceed the allowable height under the Municipal Code, they will not impact negatively on the public right of way. Similarly, the glycol system within the driveway and private approach will not impact negatively on the public right of way. Therefore, Transportation Services recommends approval of these encroachments.
The agent together with any other interested parties will be given the opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.104 - Staff Report - 258 Warren Road - Various Encroachments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32674.pdf) TE36.104 - Staff Report - 258 Warren Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32675.pdf) |
TE36.105 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Glycol Heating System - 73 South Drive |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the maintenance of the glycol heating system at the front of 73 South Drive, subject to the owner entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain approval for associated work from Toronto Building;
d. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
e. remove the glycol heating system upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
f. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the encroachment agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owner of 73 South Drive to maintain a glycol heating system that encroaches within the public right of way fronting 73 South Drive.
As the installation of the glycol heating system does not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of this encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.105 - Staff Report - 73 South Drive - Glycol Heating System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32676.pdf) TE36.105 - Staff Report - 73 South Drive - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32677.pdf) |
TE36.106 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Glycol Heating System - 33 Strathearn Road |
Origin |
(July 16, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the installation and maintenance of a glycol heating system that will encroach within the public right of way fronting 33 Strathearn Road, subject to the owners entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages, and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any conditions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement.
c. obtain approval for associated work on private property from Toronto Building;
d. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
e. remove the glycol heating system upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
f. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the Encroachment Agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owners of 33 Strathearn Road to install and maintain a glycol heating system that encroaches within the public right of way fronting 33 Strathearn Road.
As the installation of the glycol heating system does not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of this encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.106 - Staff Report - 33 Strathearn Road - Glycol Heating System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32678.pdf) TE36.106 - Staff Report - 33 Strathearn Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32679.pdf) |
TE36.107 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Glycol Heating System - 100 Glen Road |
Origin |
(July 22, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the installation and maintenance of a glycol heating system that will encroach within the public right of way fronting 100 Glen Road, subject to the owners entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages, and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any conditions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain clearance and/or sign off from Toronto Parks, Forestry & Recreation, Urban Forestry Group and satisfy any requirements that Urban Forestry may have;
d. obtain approval for associated work on private property from Toronto Building;
e. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
f. remove the glycol heating system upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
g. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the Encroachment Agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owners of 100 Glen Road to install and maintain a glycol heating system that encroaches within the public right of way fronting 100 Glen Road.
As the installation of the glycol heating system does not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of this encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.107 - Staff Report - 100 Glen Road - Glycol Heating System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32680.pdf) TE36.107 - Staff Report - 100 Glen Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32681.pdf) |
TE36.108 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Glycol Heating System - 102 Glen Road |
Origin |
(July 22, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the installation and maintenance of a glycol heating system that will encroach within the public right of way fronting 102 Glen Road, subject to the owners entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages, and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any conditions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain approval for associated work on private property from Toronto Building;
d. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
e. remove the glycol heating system upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
f. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the Encroachment Agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owners of 102 Glen Road to install and maintain a glycol heating system that encroaches within the public right of way fronting 102 Glen Road.
As the installation of the glycol heating system does not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of this encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.108 - Staff Report - 102 Glen Road - Glycol Heating System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32683.pdf) TE36.108 - Staff Report - 102 Glen Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32684.pdf) |
TE36.109 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Glycol Heating System - 4 Cluny Avenue |
Origin |
(July 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the installation and maintenance of a glycol heating system that will encroach within the public right of way fronting 4 Cluny Avenue, subject to the owners entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages, and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any conditions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain clearance and/or sign off from Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Urban Forestry Group and satisfy any requirements that Urban Forestry may have;
d. obtain approval for associated work on private property from Toronto Building;
e. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
f. remove the glycol heating system upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
g. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the Encroachment Agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owners of 4 Cluny Avenue to install and maintain a glycol heating system that encroaches within the public right of way fronting 4 Cluny Avenue.
As the installation of the glycol heating system does not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of this encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.109 - Staff Report - 4 Cluny Avenue - Glycol Heating System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32685.pdf) TE36.109 - Staff Report - 4 Cluny Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32686.pdf) |
TE36.110 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Glycol Heating System - 94 Inglewood Drive |
Origin |
(July 15, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the installation and maintenance of the glycol heating system fronting 94 Inglewood Drive, subject to the owner entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the glycol heating system at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. obtain approval for associated work from Toronto Building;
d. pay for the costs of preparing the Agreement and the registration of the Agreement on title;
e. remove the glycol heating system upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
f. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Direct Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer of the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
3. Request Legal Services to prepare and execute the Encroachment Agreement. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the agent of the owner of 94 Inglewood Drive to install a glycol heating system that will encroach within the public right of way fronting 94 Inglewood Drive.
As the installation of the glycol heating system does not impact negatively on the public right of way, Transportation Services recommends approval of this encroachment. |
Financial Impact |
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this report. |
Background Information |
TE36.110 - Staff Report - 94 Inglewood Drive - Glycol Heating System (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32687.pdf) TE36.110 - Staff Report - 94 Inglewood Drive - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32688.pdf) |
TE36.111 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 20, 27 |
Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Gould Street, Victoria Street, Willcocks Street and Devonshire Place - Community Council |
Origin |
(August 8, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Close Gould Street to vehicular traffic in both directions between O’Keefe Lane and Bond Street from August 23, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
2. Close Victoria Street to vehicular traffic in both directions between Gould Street and a point approximately 64 metres south of Gould Street from August 23, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
3. Close Willcocks Street to vehicular traffic in both directions between Huron Street and St. George Street from August 23, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
4. Close Devonshire Place to vehicular traffic in both directions between Hoskin Avenue and a point approximately 125 metres north of Hoskin Avenue from August 23, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
5. Contingent upon the approval of Recommendations 1, 2, 3 and 4, approve the amendments to the traffic and parking regulations outlined in Appendix A to the report dated August 8, 2010 from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District and the Director, Public Realm Section.
6. Request the General Manager of Transportation Services to evaluate the pilot pedestrian zones and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the results in the fourth quarter of 2011. |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
At its meeting on September 15, 2009, Toronto and East York Community Council directed Transportation Services to consult with Ryerson University and University of Toronto on the feasibility of closing streets to vehicular traffic to implement pedestrian zone pilot projects and to report back on the results of the pilot projects in the third quarter of 2010. For a variety of reasons including proposed water main and on-campus construction projects, the pedestrian zone pilot projects have been delayed.
This report is seeking authority from Toronto and East York Community Council to close portions of Gould Street, Victoria Street, Willcocks Street and Devonshire Place to vehicular traffic, with the exception of emergency vehicles, for approximately 12 months to accommodate the Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects at Ryerson University and at the University of Toronto and to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on the effectiveness of the pilot projects by the fourth quarter of 2011. |
Financial Impact |
All costs associated with the installation of the Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects are included within the Transportation Services Division’s Capital Budget in Account CTP 709-09. Maintenance costs associated with the pilot project(s) will be absorbed by the universities.
The closure of Willcocks Street and Devonshire Place will result in the loss of “Pay and Display” parking spots for the duration of the University of Toronto pilot project. As the pilot project is a City Council mandated initiative, the University of Toronto will not have to pay for the lost revenue from these parking spaces to the Toronto Parking Authority. The closure of Gould Street and Victoria Street has no impact on parking revenue. |
Background Information |
TE36.111 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Community Council (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33030.pdf) TE36.111 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33031.pdf) TE36.111 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33032.pdf) TE36.111 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33033.pdf) TE36.111 - Staff Report - Notice of Pending Report - Ryerson University and University of Toronto Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32682.pdf) |
TE36.112 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 20, 27 |
Ryerson University and University of Toronto - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Gould Street, Victoria Street, Willcocks Street and Devonshire Place - City Council |
Origin |
(August 8, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council authorize staff to enter into such agreement(s) with Ryerson University for the Pedestrian Zone Pilot Project on such terms and conditions generally as set out in Attachment 1 to the report dated August 8, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services, and on such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the General Manager of Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager of Transportation Services be authorized to execute any such agreement(s) on behalf of the City.
2. City Council authorize staff to enter into such agreement(s) with the University of Toronto for the Pedestrian Zone Pilot Project on such terms and conditions generally as set out in Attachment 2 to the report dated August 8, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services, and on such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the General Manager of Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager of Transportation Services be authorized to execute any such agreement(s) on behalf of the City. |
Summary |
At its meeting on September 15, 2009, Toronto and East York Community Council directed Transportation Services to consult with Ryerson University and University of Toronto on the feasibility of closing streets to vehicular traffic to implement pedestrian zone pilot projects and to report back on the results of the pilot projects in the third quarter of 2010. For a variety of reasons including proposed water main and on-campus construction projects, the pedestrian zone pilot projects have been delayed.
This report is seeking authority from City Council to enter into a maintenance agreement with each of Ryerson University and the University of Toronto, which agreement will outline the roles and responsibilities of the City and the respective university. |
Financial Impact |
All costs associated with the installation of the Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects are included within the Transportation Services Division’s Capital Budget in Account CTP 709-09. Maintenance costs associated with the pilot project(s) will be absorbed by the universities. |
Background Information |
TE36.112 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - City Council (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33035.pdf) TE36.112 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33036.pdf) TE36.112 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33037.pdf) TE36.112 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects - Attachment 3 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-33038.pdf) TE36.112 - Staff Report - Pedestrian Zone Pilot Projects (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32705.pdf) |
(Deferred from March 9, 2010 - 2010.TE32.32) (Deferred from February 9, 2010 - 2010.TE31.59) |
TE36.113 | ACTION |
|
|
Ward: 28 |
Extension of Taxicab Stand - Richmond Street West, North Side, Between York Street and Bay Street |
Origin |
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Recommendations |
Transportation Services recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Taxicab Stand regulation, currently in place for 2 taxicabs on the north side of Richmond Street West, between a point 28 metres east of York Street and a point 37 metres east of York Street, to operate for 5 taxicabs on the north side of Richmond Street West, between a point 28 metres east of York Street and a point 63.5 metres east of York Street.
2. City Council rescind the existing ‘No Stopping 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday except Public Holidays’ regulation, currently in effect on the north side of Richmond Street West, between York Street and a point approximately 47 metres east.
3. City Council rescind the existing ‘No Stopping 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., Monday to Friday except Public Holidays’ regulation, currently in effect on the north side of Richmond Street West, between a point 47 metres east of York Street and a point 36.0 metres west of Berti Street.
4. City Council prohibit stopping on the north side of Richmond Street West, between York Street and a point approximately 63.5 metres east of York Street, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., except Saturdays, Sundays, and Public Holidays.
5. City Council prohibit stopping on the north side of Richmond Street West, between a point 63.5 metres east of York Street and a point 36 metres west of Berti Street, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., Monday to Friday except Public Holidays. |
Summary |
The Sheraton Centre Toronto Hotel on January 1, 2010, closed the on-site taxicab facility in the Motor Court area of the hotel. The Motor Court is located on the west side of the hotel, with access previously provided for taxis from York Street via a driveway between Queen Street West and Richmond Street West. As a result, taxis which typically would have waited on-site for their fares will need to be relocated off the hotel property.
Transportation Services is seeking authority to extend the easterly limit of the existing 2-vehicle taxicab stand, located on the north side of Richmond Street West east of York Street, to provide three additional taxicab spaces. In order to provide 3 additional taxicab spaces, the bus pickup/drop off zone will need to be reduced by 16.5 metres. This change will not impact significantly on bus loading/unloading operations. |
Financial Impact | ||||||
|
||||||
Background Information |
TE36.113 - Staff Report - Richmond Street West - Extension of Taxicab Stand (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31279.pdf) TE36.113 - Staff Report - Richmond Street West - Drawing No. 421F-9897 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-31280.pdf) |
TE36.114 | ACTION |
|
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
Appointments to the Board of Management of the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre |
Origin |
(June 23, 2010) Letter from Susan Neal, Executive Director, Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre |
Recommendations |
The Board of Management of Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appoint at the pleasure of Council to the Board of Management for Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre the following individuals nominated at the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre’s Annual Meeting and whose appointment complies with the Public Appointments Policy:
- for further two-year terms: Mr. Hilolwe Mohamed, Ms Carol Niu, and Mrs. Shirley Leigh; and
- for new two-year terms: Mr Abdi Sheikh Ali, Ms. Joyce Leonard, and Ms. Beverly Wolfus.
2. Remove the following individuals from the Board of Management for Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre as they will not be renewing terms: Ms.Catherine Currie, Ms. Maureen Kenny and Mrs. Alice Mann. |
Summary |
At the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre’s Annual Meeting held on June 17, 2010, the membership of the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre nominated the individuals listed in Recommendation 1 for appointment by Toronto and East York Community Council to the Board of Management of the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre. Appointments to the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre Board of Management is a matter for which the community council has been delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision, provided that the recommendations do not vary from the Public Appointments Policy.
The nominees are qualified to serve on the Board of Management pursuant to the terms established by the applicable City of Toronto By-law (Chapter 25 of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code), the Relationship Framework for Board run Community Centres and the Council’s Public Appointments Policy.
By this letter, the Board of Management requests that all individuals named be appointed as Directors on the Board of Management of Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre.
On behalf of the Board of Management, I respectfully request the City take the necessary steps to implement the above requested appointments. |
Background Information |
TE36.114 - Appointments to Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-32693.pdf) |
TE36.115 | ACTION |
|
|
|
Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes |
Summary |
Seeking endorsement of events for liquor licensing purposes. |
Communications |
(June 29, 2010) E-mail from Emily Miller, Royal Agricultural Winter Fair, requesting that The Royal Agricultural Winter Fair to be held from November 2 to November 14, 2010, in the Direct Energy Centre (with the exception of the Ricoh Coliseum) at Exhibition Place, 100 Princes' Boulevard, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. daily, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE36.115.1) (August 4, 2010) Letter from Councillor Kyle Rae forwarding a letter from the Director, Special Events, Toronto International Film Festival, requesting that the 35th TIFF Festival to take place from September 9 to 19, 2010, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting liquor extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the etablishments listed. (TE.Main.TE36.115.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/comm/communicationfile-16803.pdf) (August 12, 2010) Letter from Councillor Kyle Rae forwarding a letter from Nick Di Donato, Liberty Entertainment Group, requesting that the Ciao Wine Bar, 133 Yorkville Avenue, be granted a boulevard extension (approximately 7 metres wide by 11.25 metres in length on the south side of Yorkville Avenue) in conjunction with the Toronto International Film Festival from Friday, September 10 to Sunday, September 12, 2010, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. daily. (TE.New.TE36.115.3) (August 13, 2010) Letter from Darryl Hurs, Indie Week, requesting that Indie Week Canada 2010 be declared an event of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes; and requesting extended liquor licences until 4:00 a.m. from Wednesday, October 13 to Sunday, October 17, 2010 for the Bovine Club, Cherry Cola's, The Drake Hotel (including The Drake Underground and the Sky Yard), The Hideout, The Mod Club and The Rivoli (TE.New.TE36.115.4) (August 13, 2010) Letter from Laura Purdy, Director, Sales and Marketing, Exhibition Place, requesting that the Screemers 2010 Event to be held on October 15, 16, 17 and 21-31 inclusive, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., for licensed areas within the Queen Elizabeth Exhibit Hall, the Food Parkette and the Queen Elizabeth Lawn at Exhibition Place be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.New.TE36.115.5) (August 6, 2010) Letter from Dr. Haile Fenta, President, Ethiopian Association in the Greater Toronto Area, requesting that the Ethiopian-Canada Day Celebration to be held on September 11, 2010, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. at Christie Pits Park, 750 Bloor Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting permission for a beverage garden. (TE.New.TE36.115.6) |