![]() |
Decision Document |
|
Toronto and East York Community Council |
Meeting No. | 31 | Contact | Rosalind Dyers, Committee Administrator | |
Meeting Date |
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 |
Phone | 416-392-7033 | |
Start Time |
9:30 AM |
teycc@toronto.ca | ||
Location |
Committee Room 1, City Hall
|
Chair | Councillor Pam McConnell |
The Decision Document and Decision Summary are for preliminary reference purposes only. Please refer to the Committee’s Report to Council or the Minutes for the official record.
Action taken by the Community Council on items that are “delegated” (Community Council makes final decision) are so noted.
Minutes Confirmed - Meeting of January 12, 2010. |
TE31.1 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 27 |
Closure of the Public Lane Extending Southerly from St. Joseph Street at the Rear of 616-618 Yonge Street |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close the public lane extending southerly from St. Joseph Street at the rear of 616 to 618 Yonge Street, shown as Part 1 on Draft Reference Plan prepared by R. Avis Surveying Inc. and marked as Drawing No. 2584-OR.DWG. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on February 9, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site. No one appeared before the Community Council. |
Origin |
(January 26, 2010) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor |
Summary |
To enact a By-law to permanently close the public lane extending southerly from St. Joseph Street at the rear of 616 to 618 Yonge Street, shown as Part 1 on Draft Reference Plan prepared by R. Avis Surveying Inc. and marked as Drawing No. 2584-OR.DWG as a public lane and be sold upon the terms and conditions set out in Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE30.97, as adopted by City Council at its meeting held on January 26 and 27, 2010. |
Background Information |
TE31.1 - Draft By-law - Closure of Public Lane Southerly from St. Joseph Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27023.pdf) |
TE31.2 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 28 |
Closure of Portions of Bonnycastle Street and Lake Shore Boulevard East |
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
A. City Council enact the draft-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close portions of Bonnycastle Street and Lake Shore Boulevard East as public highways:
1. The portion of Bonnycastle Street, described as follows: Part of PIN 21384-0081 (LT) Being Part of Princess Street Plan 666E Toronto (AKA Bonnycastle Street); Between Lake Shore Boulevard and Queens Quay, Toronto, designated as Part 2 on Plan 66R-24664, City of Toronto Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office (No. 66).
2. The portion of Lake Shore Boulevard East, described as follows: Part of PIN 21092-0256 (LT) Being Part of Lot 12 Plan 694E Toronto Known as Lake Shore Blvd East; Between Parliament Street and Lower Sherbourne Street, City of Toronto designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-24664, City of Toronto Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office (No. 66),
and that Sections 1. and 2. of this By-law not take effect until the moment in time immediately prior to the registration in the appropriate land registry office of a Transfer, by the City of Toronto as transferor, of the lands described in Sections 1. and 2. of this By-law. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on February 9, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site. No one appeared before the Community Council. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor |
Summary |
To enact a By-law to permanently close a portion of Bonnycastle Street and a portion of Lake Shore Boulevard East as public highways and be sold upon the terms and conditions set out in Executive Committee Item EX36.12, as adopted by City Council at its meeting held on November 30, December 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8, 2009. |
Background Information |
TE31.2 - Draft By-law - Closure of Portions of Bonnycastle and Lake Shore Boulevard East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26974.pdf) |
TE31.3 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: 20 |
Final Report - 295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Zoning By-law for the lands at 295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment provided in Attachment 1 of the report dated February 4, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the introduction of Bills, City Council require that the applicant’s Functional Servicing Report and Transportation Impact Study shall be revised to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services.
4. Prior to the introduction of Bills, City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary Bill authorizing the entering into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the relocation of 104 John Street.
5. Prior to the introduction of Bills, City Council require the applicant to submit a Conservation and Rehabilitation Plan for the relocation and restoration of the heritage building at 104 John Street, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, to the satisfaction and acceptance of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. The Conservation and Rehabilitation Plan must include the following items: (1) “blow-up” elevations and sections of the heritage property; (2) existing conditions assessment; and (3) feasibility study to further explore the method in which relocation of the structure would occur so that the integrity of the heritage structure is not physically compromised.
6. Prior to the introduction of Bills, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to execute an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. An indexed cash contribution of $1,300,000.00, of which 10% will be allocated to affordable housing in Ward 20, and the remainder for the provision of one or more of the following:
- streetscape improvements on John Street; - design development supporting the John Street streetscape project; and - Heritage Conservation District Studies in the King Spadina East Precinct subject to the appropriate Official Plan Amendment coming into force and effect.
$100,000 of the above cash contribution is to be provided at the enactment of Bills, for the purpose of contributing to design development for the John Street streetscape or one or more Heritage Conservation District studies within the East Precinct of King-Spadina, subject to the appropriate Official Plan Amendment coming into force and effect; $500,000 (indexed) to be provided prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit; and the remaining $700,000 (indexed) is to be provided prior to the release of the condominium for registration.
b. A public art contribution in accordance with the Percent for Public Art Program for a value not less than one percent of the gross construction cost.
c. The provision of a publicly accessible landscaped open space on the John Street frontage of the site, with a minimum size of 335 sq. m.
d. In substantial accordance with the Conservation Plan prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated June 17, 2009, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall relocate and restore the heritage building at 104 John Street, and in the event of a lesser expenditure than identified in the Conservation Plan, the difference shall be re-directed to Heritage Conservation District studies within the King-Spadina East Precinct.
e. Prior to Site Plan Approval, the applicant shall provide additional information, based on the proposed Conservation Plan drawings to include documentation substantially in accordance with that outlined in Section 3.2.1 Option A (page 12) of the submitted Conservation Plan, specifically:
i. a detailed plan to outline mitigation measures that address construction impacts relative to the on-site heritage structures;
ii. plans for interpretive panels or other interpretive materials to communicate the development history of the property including the research content, design and location of the interpretive materials. The interpretation plan shall include panels or materials at both the existing location of the heritage building and the proposed location within the development site. All above components of the plan shall be to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services; and
iii. provide a landscape plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
f. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, including for demolition, excavation, shoring, foundation or above grade, the owner shall:
i. provide a Letter of Credit in a form and in an amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan;
ii. provide final plans satisfactory to the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
g. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall provide evidence and documentation that the project scheme has been implemented, per the approved Conservation Plan, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
h. Prior to Site Plan Approval, provide a program of commemoration/ interpretation of archaeological findings within the context of the site's development, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. A minimum of ten percent (10%) of the residential units in the building will have at least three bedrooms, or be convertible to three or more bedrooms.
j. Architectural plans, elevations and landscape drawings will be secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in conjunction with the Site Plan Application, and the owner will be required to submit 1:50 scale elevation drawings for the podium illustrating materials and finishes to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
k. The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain exterior building and landscape materials to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director.
l. The owner shall be encouraged to build in conformity with the Green Development Standard Checklist on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning Division, received May 4, 2009.
m. The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, as reviewed and accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support the development.
n. The implementation of any wind mitigation measures required by the applicant’s wind study, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to be submitted as part of a revised application for Site Plan Approval.
o. Provide and maintain an irrigation system, at the applicant’s expense, for proposed trees within the public road allowances including an automatic timer, designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and constructed with a back flow preventer to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services Division, and requirement to maintain in good order and operation.
7. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to complete the process to stop up and close the public laneway at the north end of the site.
8. Prior to the issuance of any below grade permits, including excavation and shoring, the applicant confirm that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been completed to the satisfaction of the City's Planning Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture (Heritage Operations Unit). |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 9, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a 43-storey mixed use building and a publicly accessible landscaped open space, with 338 below grade parking spaces, at 295 Adelaide Street West, 100 and 104 John Street, on the site of a commercial parking lot. Proposed uses include retail, restaurant, and residential condominium (approximately 471 dwelling units), and possibly a hotel (76 rooms). If a hotel is not included, the development will contain approximately 529 units. The site includes a heritage building located at the north end of the site (104 John Street), which is proposed to be moved to the south end of the site adjacent to an existing building of heritage character.
The proposal is consistent with the King Spadina Built Form Study in that it is located in an area appropriate for tall buildings. It meets the intent of the 2006 King Spadina Urban Design Guidelines, and the Tall Buildings Guidelines.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Background Information |
TE31.3 - Staff Report - 295 Adelaide West, 100-104 John Street - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26822.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 1, 2010) Fax from M. Meyer Elkaim (TE.New.TE31.3.1) |
3a | Supplementary Report - 295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street - Zoning By-law Amendment |
Origin |
(February 4, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
The January 15, 2010 report, “295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report”, recommends approval for a 43-storey mixed use building at 295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street. At the time of report preparation, the Section 37 contribution details were still under discussion between the applicant, staff and the Councillor. The details have now been resolved. This supplementary report provides revised recommendations as a result of concluding the negotiations with the applicant. It also includes the Draft Zoning By-law for the development in Attachment 1. |
Background Information |
TE31.3a - Staff Report - 295 Adelaide Street West, 100-104 John Street - Supplementary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27198.pdf) |
TE31.4 | ACTION |
Amended |
|
Ward: 27 |
Final Report - 2 Bloor Street West - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached to the Supplementary Report dated February 8, 2010 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as Attachment No. 1.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:
a. A payment of $500,000.00, when the site-specific by-law allowing the development comes into full force and effect, and indexed to the non-residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, for the period from the coming into force of the By-law to the date of payment.
b. Provision and maintenance of works of public art in publicly accessible portions of the site, or on lands owned by the City in the vicinity, of a value not less than one percent of the cost of construction of all buildings and structures erected on the site.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
c. At the sole discretion of the City's Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the City's Executive Director, Technical Services, for which the owner shall obtain approval in writing from the Chief Planner prior to the issuance of any site plan approval for any portion of the lot pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, either:
i. maintenance of the existing below grade, publicly accessible pedestrian connection beneath Cumberland Street to the concourse level of the building permitted by this By-law together with the construction, provision and maintenance of a publicly accessible concourse-level corridor between such connection and the "Bay" Toronto Transit Commission subway station; or
ii. construction, provision and maintenance of a new north-south corridor commencing at the concourse-level connection to the "Bay" Toronto Transit Commission subway station within the building permitted by this By-law and terminating at or near the north-west corner of the lot, together with the construction at the end of the terminus of such corridor of a "knock-out" panel allowing for a simplified connection to a future underground tunnel that may be constructed to connect other lands located further north on Bay Street; or
iii. such other alternative connection as the owner and the Chief Planner may agree upon in writing, with any such required corridors, connections and "knock-out panel" to be completed prior to the first occupancy of any building erected on the lot subsequent to the enactment of this by-law. For the sake of clarity, in the event the owner and the Chief Planner cannot agree on an alternative option as provided in clause iii. herein, the owner shall provide either the option in paragraph i. or ii. as determined in the sole discretion of the Chief Planner.
The owner shall provide a letter of credit to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for any portion of the lot in an amount sufficient to secure these requirements, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner in consultation with the Chief Building Official.
d. Provision and maintenance of a continuous publicly accessible pedestrian connection from Bay Street, at grade, to the concourse level of the proposed building and connecting to the TTC subway station entrance access below Bay Street.
e. Construction, provision and maintenance of a continuous publicly accessible pedestrian connection from Cumberland Street, at grade, to the concourse level of the existing building on Parcel B and connecting to the below-grade pedestrian connection located below Yonge Street leading to the "Bloor" Toronto Transit Commission subway station.
f. Streetscape improvements adjacent to the site.
g. Approval of architectural plans, elevations and landscape drawings to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in conjunction with the Site Plan Application, and submission of 1:50 scale elevation drawings for the podium illustrating materials and finishes to be approved pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
h. Provision and maintenance of an irrigation system, at the applicant’s expense, for proposed trees within the public road allowances including an automatic timer, designed to be water efficient by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA) and constructed with a back flow preventer to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Technical Services Division, and requirement to maintain in good order and operation.
i. The provision and maintenance of required wind mitigation measures, as identified in a wind tunnel analysis report submitted by the owner to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the incorporation of such measures into the plans and drawings to be approved pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
j. Preparation of a Construction Management Plan and Neighbourhood Communication Strategy to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Executive Director, Technical Services.
k. Payment of costs associated with the proposed conversion of Cumberland Street to two-way operation, from Bay Street up to the site access driveway, including all costs associated with the functional pavement marking and signing plan as may be approved by the City through site plan approval.
l. If, prior to the issuance of site plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the lot or any portion thereof, City Council does not authorize the conversion of the portion of Cumberland Street adjacent to the vehicular access driveway proposed on Parcel A from one-way to two-way operation, the owner shall, prior to the issuance of site plan approval and prior to any building permit issuing for any portion of the lot, seek approval for the reconfiguration of the ground floor plan and parking garage of the proposed development so as to relocate the vehicular ingress/egress, or for the implementation of another suitable alternative access scheme, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Executive Director, Technical Services.
4. City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above-noted recommendations.
5. City Council determine that no further notice is required under the Planning Act with respect to this matter. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 9, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(January 25, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This application was made on June 27, 2008 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes to redevelop the site of the existing 2-storey retail structure at 2 Bloor Street West with a mixed-use development comprising: a 7-storey podium building containing commercial, residential and parking uses, with rooftop villa units above the 7th floor at Bay Street; a 48-storey residential tower fronting onto Cumberland Street and a 36-storey residential tower at Yonge Street.
The proposal represents an opportunity to intensify and revitalize an underutilized site at an important intersection and improve the pedestrian realm along Bay, Cumberland and Yonge Streets.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
Background Information |
TE31.4 - Staff Report - 2 Bloor Street West - Rezoning Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26823.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 28, 2010) Letter from W. Carson Woods, President, Carson Woods Architects Limited (TE.New.TE31.4.1) (February 3, 2010) Fax from Dennis Graff (TE.New.TE31.4.2) (February 8, 2010) Fax from Robert B. Statton (TE.New.TE31.4.3) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Alex Stuart, Managing Partner, The Pilot Tavern (TE.New.TE31.4.4) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Simon Parry (TE.New.TE31.4.5) |
4a | Supplementary Report - 2 Bloor Street West - Rezoning Application |
Origin |
(February 8, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend changes to certain conditions of approval contained in the Final Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, dated January 25, 2010. These changes are recommended to (a) clarify the intent of the conditions of approval and (b) secure the provision of public access to a second pedestrian route through the proposal. |
Background Information |
TE31.4a - Staff Report - 2 Bloor Street West - Rezoning Application - Supplementary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27210.pdf) |
TE31.5 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 27 |
Final Report - 55 Charles Street West - Draft Plan of Condominium Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize Draft Approval of the Plan of Condominium (05 112260 STE 27 CD) for 55 Charles Street West, prepared by R. Avis, OLS on September 10, 2004, revised, and date stamped by City Planning on July 8, 2008, subject to the conditions set forth in Attachment 3 to the report dated January 14, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director to permit such red line revisions as he/she may deem appropriate.
2. City Council require the owner to fulfil the conditions of Draft Approval of Condominium set forth in Attachment 3 to the report dated January 14, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, including the execution and satisfactory registration of any agreements deemed necessary by the City Solicitor, prior to the City’s consent for final registration and authorize the City Solicitor to prepare any necessary agreements to secure the conditions, as the City Solicitor deems necessary.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Conditions of Draft Approval of Condominium as may be required.
4. City Council authorize and direct City Officials to take necessary actions to give effect thereto. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 9, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
An application has been submitted to permit the conversion of a 32-storey, 148 unit rental apartment building into a residential condominium building at 55 Charles Street West.
A Draft Plan of Condominium application (05 112260 STE 27 CD) has been made to create a 149 unit residential condominium by converting the existing 148 apartment units to condominium and constructing an additional residential condominium unit within the existing structure.
This report reviews and recommends the approval of the application to permit the conversion and authorizes the Chief Planner and Executive Director to approve the Draft Plan of Condominium subject to specific conditions. |
Background Information |
TE31.5 - Staff Report - 55 Charles Street West - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26824.pdf) |
TE31.6 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 29 |
Final Report - Part of 769 Broadview Avenue - Rezoning Application |
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report dated January 14, 2010, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, headed "Part of 769 Broadview Avenue - Rezoning Application - Final Report."
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 9, 2010, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
The proposal is to rezone a newly completed landscaped parkette at the southeast corner of Broadview Avenue and Erindale Avenue, part of 769 Broadview Avenue.
At its meeting on November 10, 2009, Toronto and East York Community Council directed that a community consultation meeting be scheduled and notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.
This report reviews and recommends approval to amend the Zoning By-law to rezone the portion of the site adjacent to Broadview Avenue and Erindale Avenue, where the parkette is located, to “G” which will bring the zoning into conformity with the Official Plan. |
Background Information |
TE31.6 - Staff Report - Part of 769 Broadview Avenue - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26825.pdf) |
TE31.7 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 28 |
Application for Residential Demolition - Part of 620 Dundas Street East (251 Sackville Street), 213-235 Sackville Green, 563-583 Dundas Street East and Part of 591 Dundas Street East |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish the subject residential building(s), part of 620 Dundas Street East (251 Sackville Street), 213-235 Sackville Green, 563-583 Dundas Street East, and part of 591 Dundas Street East, with the following conditions, notwithstanding that there is no building permit for replacement buildings on the sites:
a. the removal, handling and disposal of all hazardous materials including but not limited to asbestos, lead, silica, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls shall be conducted in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Labour regulations and guidelines;
b. the owner shall ensure the implementation of the demolition and excavation dust control measures approved by the Medical Officer of Health;
c. the owner shall submit any further required information for the review and approval of the Medical Officer of Health and the Chief Building Official, as may be required, prior to the issuance of the demolition permit;
d. prior to initiating any demolition activities, the owner shall notify Toronto Public Health (416-338-8062) of the date the demolition is scheduled to commence;
e. all debris and rubble shall be removed from the site immediately after demolition;
f. any holes on the property shall be back-filled with clean fill; and
g. the owner shall not commence demolition related activities if it will impact privately owned trees protected under Municipal Code, Chapter 813, Trees, Article III unless the trees have been authorized for removal or tree protection measures have been put in place in accordance with the City of Toronto’s “Tree Protection Policy and Specifications for Construction Near Trees.” |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This application is to demolish 71 rental residential units within the Regent Park redevelopment area. As part of the Council approved revitalization of Regent Park all of the existing social housing units to be demolished will be replaced and tenants are to receive assistance with relocation.
This report is before Community Council, in accordance with City-wide residential demolition control under Article II, Demolition Control, of Municipal Code CH. 363, as amended by By-law 1009-2006, enacted by City Council on September 27, 2006, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act. |
Background Information |
TE31.7 - Staff Report - Application for Residential Demolition - Regent Park Area (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26826.pdf) |
TE31.8 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 20 |
395-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane - Amendments to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-laws under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the revised Reasons for Designation for the properties at 395-405 Huron Street (Campus Co-op) as set out in Attachment No. 4A of the report dated October 28, 2009, from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division.
2. City Council adopt the revised Reasons for Designation for the property at 80 bpNichol Lane (Coach House Books) as set out in Attachment No. 4B of the report dated October 28, 2009, from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division.
3. Upon receipt of the University of Toronto’s withdrawal of its notices of objection to the proposed designations of the properties at 305-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council with the amended Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachments Nos. 4A and 4B, designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Origin |
(October 28, 2009) Report from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council amend the Reasons for Designation for the properties at 395-405 Huron Street (Campus Co-op) as adopted by Council at its meeting of December 12 and 13, 2007, amend the Reasons for Designation for the property at 80 bpNichol Lane (Coach House Books) as adopted by Council at its meeting of May 26 and 27, 2008, and that Council pass the by-laws designating the properties at 395-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Following its meeting of December 12 and 13, 2007, City Council served notice of its intention to designate the properties at 395-405 Huron Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. On February 15, 2008, the University of Toronto submitted an objection to the notice of intention to designate and the matter was referred to the Conservation Review Board. In a letter dated July 15, 2008, the university also objected to Council’s notice of intention to designate the adjoining property at 80 bpNichol Lane, which followed the Council meeting of May 26 and 27, 2008, and was referred to the Conservation Review Board. The University of Toronto has agreed to withdraw its two objections subject to minor revisions to the original Reasons for Designations (Attachments Nos. 3A and 3B) and their replacement by the Revised Reasons for Designation (Attachments Nos. 4A and 4B).
Heritage Preservation Services is satisfied that the revised Reasons for Designation will ensure that the properties’ cultural heritage values and attributes are preserved. |
Background Information |
TE31.8 - Revised Staff Report - 395-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane - Heritage (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26827.pdf) |
8a | 395-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane - Amendments to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-laws under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on January 21, 2010, considered the report (October 28, 2009) from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting 395-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane - Amendments to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-laws under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Background Information |
TE31.8a - Letter - 395-405 Huron Street and 80 bpNichol Lane (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26828.pdf) |
TE31.9 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 27 |
414-418 Church Street - Amendment to Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the Revised Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachment 4 of the report dated January 8, 2010, from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division.
2. Upon receipt of the owners’ withdrawal of their notice of objection, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce a bill in Council with the amended Reasons for Designation as set out in Attachment 4 of the report dated January 8, 2010, from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Origin |
(January 8, 2010) Report from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division |
Summary |
This report recommends that City Council amend the Reasons for Designation for the properties at 414-418 Church Street (Stephen Murphy Houses and Store) as adopted by Council at its meeting of April 25-27, 2006, and that Council pass the by-law designating the properties at 414-418 Church Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Following its meeting of April 25-27, 2006, City Council served notice of its intention to designate the properties at 414-418 Church Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. On June 29, 2006, the property owners’ representative submitted an objection to the notice of intention to designate and the matter was referred to the Conservation Review Board. The property owners have agreed to withdraw their objections subject to minor revisions to the original Reasons for Designation (Attachment No. 3) and their replacement by the revised Reasons for Designation (Attachment No. 4).
Heritage Preservation Services is satisfied that the revised Reasons for Designation will ensure that the property’s cultural heritage values and attributes are preserved. |
Background Information |
TE31.9 - Staff Report - 414-418 Church Street - Reasons for Heritage Designation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26829.pdf) |
9a | 414-418 Church Street - Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on January 21, 2010, considered the report (January 8, 2010) from the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting 414-418 Church Street - Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
Background Information |
TE31.9.a - Letter - 414-418 Church Street - Heritage Designation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26830.pdf) |
TE31.10 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 14 |
Sign Variance - 2821 Dundas Street West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the report dated January 12, 2010, from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District, respecting the Sign Variance for 2821 Dundas Street West, until its next meeting to be held on March 9, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 12, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Timothy May of CBS Outdoor, on behalf of Robin Kristein, for approval of a variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated “V” shape roof sign that contains an illuminated static sign board facing east and an illuminated tri-vision sign board facing west. The proposed third party roof sign would be located on top of a two-storey building at 2821 Dundas Street West.
Staff recommends refusal of this application. The variance is major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.10 - Staff Report - 2821 Dundas Street West - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26831.pdf) |
TE31.11 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 18 |
Sign Variance - 1245 Dupont Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for a variance to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated pedestal sign containing an illuminated LED electronic changeable copy message centre at the northeast corner of the property at 1245 Dupont Street. |
Origin |
(August 27, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Dominic Rotundo of Pattison Sign Group, on behalf of Gallaria Mall Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated pedestal sign containing an illuminated LED electronic changeable copy message centre at the northeast corner of the property at 1245 Dupont Street.
Staff recommends refusal of this application. The variance is major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.11 - Staff Report - 1245 Dupont Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26832.pdf) |
TE31.12 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Sign Variance - 1467 Bathurst Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to permit replacement of an existing illuminated third party, four-sided pedestal sign with a newly designed four-sided illuminated ground sign, for third party advertising purposes, along St. Clair Avenue West frontage of the property at 1467 Bathurst Street. |
Origin |
(December 11, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Cross Town Car Wash, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit replacement of an existing four-sided third party, illuminated pedestal sign with a newly designed four-sided third party, illuminated ground sign along St. Clair Avenue West frontage of the property at 1467 Bathurst Street.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.12 - Staff Report - 1467 Bathurst Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26490.pdf) |
TE31.13 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Sign Variance - 624 St. Clair Avenue West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for a variance to permit replacement of an existing illuminated third party, four-sided pedestal sign with a newly designed four-sided illuminated ground sign, for third party advertising purposes, along St. Clair Avenue West frontage of the property at 624 St. Clair Avenue West. |
Origin |
(December 10, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of 857447 Ontario Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit replacement of an existing third party, four-sided illuminated pedestal sign with a newly designed four-sided illuminated ground sign for third party advertising purposes, along St. Clair Avenue West frontage of the property at 624 St. Clair Avenue West.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.13 - Staff Report - 624 St. Clair Avenue West - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26491.pdf) |
TE31.14 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Sign Variance - 21 Vaughan Road |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for a variance to permit replacement of four existing third party, four-sided illuminated pedestal signs with four newly designed, four-sided illuminated third party ground signs. Three of the four pedestal signs are located along the Bathurst Street frontage and the fourth pedestal sign is located along Vaughan Road frontage of the property at 21 Vaughan Road (see graphics attached to the report dated December 11, 2009, from the Director, Toronto Building). |
Origin |
(December 11, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Bathurst-Vaughan Mall, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit replacement of four existing illuminated, third party, four-sided pedestal signs with four newly designed, four-sided illuminated third party ground signs. Three of the four pedestal signs are located along the Bathurst Street frontage and the fourth pedestal sign is located along the Vaughan Road frontage of the property at 21 Vaughan Road (see graphics attached to the report).
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variance is major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.14 - Staff Report - 21 Vaughan Road - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26492.pdf) |
TE31.15 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Sign Variance - 83 Bloor Street West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to permit replacement of an existing third party illuminated two face roof sign with a newly designed illuminated two face third party roof sign containing an LED electronic static copy equipped to control the changeable copy image board remotely at 83 Bloor Street West. |
Origin |
(September 14, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Roy Dzeko of CBS Outdoor, on behalf of Hugo Boss Canada, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit replacement of an existing third party illuminated two face roof sign with a newly designed illuminated two face third party roof sign containing an LED electronic static copy image board equipped to control the changeable copy image remotely at 83 Bloor Street West.
Staff recommends refusal of this application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.15 - Staff Report - 83 Bloor Street West - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-25284.pdf) |
Communications |
(November 9, 2009) E-mail from Ron Palmer, Chair, PPUD Committee, Bloor-Yorkville BIA (TE.Main.TE31.15.1) |
TE31.16 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Sign Variance - 1 Bloor Street East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to permit, for third party advertising purposes, six illuminated temporary ground signs on the construction hoarding for a period of five years, at 1 Bloor Street East. |
Origin |
(January 11, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by David Mackie, on behalf of Tuscany Ridge Development for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for third party advertising purposes, six illuminated temporary ground signs on the construction hoarding for a period of three years at 1 Bloor Street East.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.16 - Staff Report - 1 Bloor Street East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26833.pdf) |
TE31.17 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Sign Variance - 466 Sherbourne Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for a variance to permit, for third party advertising purposes, replacement of an illuminated existing fascia sign with an illuminated tri-vision fascia sign on the north elevation of the building at 466 Sherbourne Street. |
Origin |
(January 12, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Timothy May of CBS Outdoor, on behalf of Paval Kanagathurai, for approval of a variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for third party advertising purposes, replacement of an illuminated existing fascia sign with an illuminated tri-vision fascia sign on the north elevation of the building.
Staff recommends refusal of this application. The variance is major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.17 - Staff Report - 466 Sherbourne Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26834.pdf) |
TE31.18 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Sign Variance - 774 Yonge Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to permit, for third party advertising purposes, a “V” shape roof sign that contains an illuminated tri-vision sign board facing north and an illuminated static sign board facing south. The proposed third party roof sign would be located on top of a three-storey listed historic building at 774 Yonge Street. |
Origin |
(January 12, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Timothy May of CBS Outdoor, on behalf of Hiev Tran, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for third party advertising purposes, a “V” shape roof sign that contains an illuminated tri-vision sign board facing north and an illuminated static sign board facing south. The proposed third party roof sign would be located on top of a three-storey listed historic building at 774 Yonge Street.
Staff recommends refusal of this application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.18 - Staff Report - 774 Yonge Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26835.pdf) |
TE31.19 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 114 Church Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, three illuminated, four-sided ground signs at 114 Church Street. |
Origin |
(December 7, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Lombard Church Holdings Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, three four-sided illuminated ground signs at 114 Church Street. These ground signs replaced previously existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs at these locations on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.19 - Staff Report - 114 Church Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26493.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.19.1) |
TE31.20 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 154 Front Street East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, two four-sided, illuminated ground signs along Front Street East frontage of the property at 154 Front Street East. |
Origin |
(December 11, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of the Toronto Transit Commission, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, two four-sided, illuminated ground signs along Front Street East frontage of the property at 154 Front Street East. These ground signs replaced previously existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs at these locations on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.20 - Staff Report - 154 Front Street East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26500.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.20.1) |
TE31.21 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 271 Front Street East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, three illuminated, four-sided ground signs. One of the three signs is located along Front Street frontage and two signs are located along the Parliament Street frontage of the property at 271 Front Street East. |
Origin |
(December 11, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of 271 Front Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, three four-sided, illuminated ground signs. One of the three signs is located along Front Street frontage and two signs are located along the Parliament Street frontage of the property at 271 Front Street East. These signs are replacement signs for legal non-conforming pedestal signs previously existing on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.21 - Staff Report - 271 Front Street East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26499.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.21.1) |
TE31.22 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 227 Gerrard Street East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, two four-sided, illuminated ground signs along Gerrard Street frontage of the property at 227 Gerrard Street East. |
Origin |
(December 11, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Brewer Retail, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, two four-sided, illuminated ground signs along Gerrard Street frontage of the property at 227 Gerrard Street East. These ground signs replaced previously existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs at these locations on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.22 - Staff Report - 227 Gerrard Street East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26496.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.22.1) |
TE31.23 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 85 Harbour Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, five four-sided, illuminated ground signs at 85 Harbour Street. |
Origin |
(December 8, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Oxford Properties Group, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, five four-sided illuminated ground signs at 85 Harbour Street. Although, these ground signs have replaced the previously existed five, four-sided, legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs at these locations on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.23 - Staff Report - 85 Harbour Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26497.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.23.1) |
TE31.24 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 65 King Street East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated, four-sided ground sign on the northwest corner of the property at 65 King Street East. |
Origin |
(December 2, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Citypark Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated, four-sided ground sign on the northwest corner of the property at 65 King Street East. This sign replaced an existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal sign.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.24 - Staff Report - 65 King Street East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26503.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.24.1) |
TE31.25 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated four-sided ground sign located on the northeast corner of the property at 307 Lakeshore Boulevard East. |
Origin |
(December 8, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Joseph Haupert, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to Maintain, for third party advertising purposes, an illuminated four-sided ground sign located on the northeast corner of the property at 307 Lakeshore Boulevard East. This ground sign replaced previously existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs at this location on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.25 - Staff Report - 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26504.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.25.1) |
TE31.26 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 21 Lower Sherbourne Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, a four-sided illuminated ground sign along Lower Sherburne Street frontage of the property at 21 Lower Sherburne Street. |
Origin |
(December 14, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Glenvale Estates Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, a four-sided illuminated ground sign along Lower Sherbourne Street frontage of the property at 21 Lower Sherbourne Street. These ground signs replaced previously existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs at these locations on the property.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.26 - Staff Report - 21 Lower Sherbourne Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26505.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.26.1) |
TE31.27 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 28 River Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, two illuminated, four-sided ground signs along River Street frontage of the property at 28 River Street (see graphics attached to the report dated December 5, 2009, from the Director, Toronto Building). |
Origin |
(December 5, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Brewers Retail, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, two illuminated, four-sided ground signs along River Street frontage of the property at 28 River Street. These signs replaced two previously existing third party pedestal signs.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.27 - Staff Report - 28 River Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26506.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.27.1) |
TE31.28 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 44 Victoria Street (25 Richmond Street East) |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused the request for variances to maintain for third party advertising purposes, three four-sided illuminated ground signs at 44 Victoria Street (25 Richmond Street East). |
Origin |
(December 15, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sid Catalano of Pattison Outdoor, on behalf of Metropolitan Parking Inc., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to maintain, for third party advertising purposes, three four-sided illuminated ground signs at 44 Victoria Street (25 Richmond Street East). These signs replaced previously existing legal non-conforming third party pedestal signs.
Staff recommends refusal of the application. The variances are major and not within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.28 - Staff Report - 44 Victoria Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26507.pdf) |
Communications |
(January 6, 2010) E-mail from David S. Crawford (TE.Main.TE31.28.1) |
TE31.29 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 33 Duggan Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the appeal for front yard parking at 33 Duggan Avenue, with the following conditions:
1. the parking area to be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.6 m by 5.9 m in dimension;
2. a downspout disconnect be installed;
3. the applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, including the planting of a full shade canopy tree on the front lawn to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services, or pay for the planting of a full shade canopy tree on City property; and
4. the applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 33 Duggan Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.29 - Staff Report - 33 Duggan Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26838.pdf) TE31.29 - Staff Report - 33 Duggan Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26839.pdf) TE31.29 - Staff Report - 33 Duggan Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26840.pdf) TE31.29 - Staff Report - 33 Duggan Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26841.pdf) TE31.29 - Staff Report - 33 Duggan Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26842.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 8, 2010) E-mail from Tania Osmond (TE.New.TE31.29.1) |
TE31.30 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 35 Duggan Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the appeal for front yard parking at 35 Duggan Avenue, with the following conditions:
1. the parking area be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.6 m by 5.5 m in dimension;
2 a downspout disconnect be installed;
3. the applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;
4. the applicant pay for the planting of a full shade canopy tree on City property in the general area, preferably on the same street, since Urban Forestry has determined that the planting of a tree at this location is not feasible, subject to the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards; and
5. the applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 35 Duggan Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.30 - Staff Report - 35 Duggan Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26843.pdf) TE31.30 - Staff Report - 35 Duggan Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26844.pdf) TE31.30 - Staff Report - 35 Duggan Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26845.pdf) TE31.30 - Staff Report - 35 Duggan Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26846.pdf) TE31.30 - Staff Report - 35 Duggan Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26847.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 8, 2010) E-mail from Tania Osmond (TE.New.TE31.30.1) |
TE31.31 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 29 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 305 Monarch Park Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the appeal for front yard parking at 305 Monarch Park Avenue, with the following conditions:
1. the parking area must be 2.2 m by 5.3 m in dimension;
2. the applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;
3. the applicant pay for the planting of a full shade canopy tree on City property in the general area, preferably on the same street, since Urban Forestry has determined that the planting of a tree at this location is not feasible, subject to the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards; and
4. the applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 305 Monarch Park Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.31 - Staff Report - 305 Monarch Park Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26848.pdf) TE31.31 - Staff Report - 305 Monarch Park Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26849.pdf) TE31.31 - Staff Report - 305 Monarch Park Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26850.pdf) TE31.31 - Staff Report - 305 Monarch Park Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26851.pdf) TE31.31 - Staff Report - 305 Monarch Park Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26852.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 2, 2010) E-mail from Betty, Neno and Simon Jenciragic (TE.New.TE31.31.1) (February 5, 2010) E-mail from Dennis Fitzgerald and Alison Hayes (TE.New.TE31.31.2) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Dr. John Tamm, on behalf of Mrs. Ingrid Tamm (TE.New.TE31.31.3) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Lisa Racicot (TE.New.TE31.31.4) |
TE31.32 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 98 Normandy Boulevard |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the appeal for front yard parking at 98 Normandy Boulevard, with the following conditions:
1. the parking area be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.6 m by 5.9 m in dimension;
2. the applicant pay for the installation of the ramp to service the parking space;
3. the applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;
4. the applicant plant a tree in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. The tree shall be a full shade canopy tree or approved equivalent, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Where and if Urban Forestry has determined that the planting of a tree at this location is not feasible, the applicant shall pay for the planting of a tree, subject to the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards; and
5. the applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 98 Normandy Boulevard for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.32 - Staff Report - 98 Normandy Boulevard - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26853.pdf) TE31.32 - Staff Report - 98 Normandy Boulevard - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26854.pdf) TE31.32 - Staff Report - 98 Normandy Boulevard - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26855.pdf) TE31.32 - Staff Report - 98 Normandy Boulevard - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26856.pdf) TE31.32 - Staff Report - 98 Normandy Boulevard - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26857.pdf) TE31.32 - Staff Report - 98 Normandy Boulevard - Appendix E (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26858.pdf) |
Declared Interests |
The following member(s) declared an interest:
|
TE31.33 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 11 Rhodes Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the appeal for front yard parking at 11 Rhodes Avenue, with the following conditions:
1. the parking area be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.3 m by 5.9 m in dimension;
2. the applicant pay for the installation of the ramp to service the parking space;
3. the applicant remove the excess paving and restore the area to soft landscaping as shown on Appendix ‘D’;
4. the applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;
5. the applicant pay for the planting of a full shade canopy tree on City property in the general area, preferably on the same street, since Urban Forestry has determined that the planting of a tree at this location is not feasible, subject to the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards; and
6. the applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 11 Rhodes Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.33 - Staff Report - 11 Rhodes Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26860.pdf) TE31.33 - Staff Report - 11 Rhodes Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26861.pdf) TE31.33 - Staff Report - 11 Rhodes Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26862.pdf) TE31.33 - Staff Report - 11 Rhodes Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26863.pdf) TE31.33 - Staff Report - 11 Rhodes Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26864.pdf) |
TE31.34 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Front Yard Parking Appeal - 10 Selwood Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the appeal for front yard parking at 10 Selwood Avenue, with the following conditions:
1. the parking area be a minimum of 2.2 m in width and not exceed 2.6 m by 5.9 m in dimension;
2. the applicant pay for the installation of the ramp to service the parking space;
3. the applicant provide the landscape features substantially in accordance with the plan as shown on Appendix ‘D’, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;
4. the applicant plant a tree in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. The tree shall be a full shade canopy tree or approved equivalent, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation; and
5. the applicant pay all applicable fees and comply with all other criteria set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 10 Selwood Avenue for front yard parking. We do not recommend approval for front yard parking at this location because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.34 - Staff Report - 10 Selwood Avenue - Front Yard Parking Appeal (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26866.pdf) TE31.34 - Staff Report - 10 Selwood Avenue - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26867.pdf) TE31.34 - Staff Report - 10 Selwood Avenue - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26868.pdf) TE31.34 - Staff Report - 10 Selwood Avenue - Appendix C (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26869.pdf) TE31.34 - Staff Report - 10 Selwood Avenue - Appendix D (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26870.pdf) |
Communications |
(November 20, 2009) E-mail from Pamela Farrell (TE.Main.TE31.34.1) |
TE31.35 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 21 |
Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 40 Burton Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the report dated January 19, 2010, from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District, respecting the request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 40 Burton Avenue, until its next meeting to be held on March 9, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 19, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards Division, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant, being the property owner, is seeking an exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences, Section 447-2(B), to permit an existing wrought iron fence constructed on top of a brick wall fence located adjacent to the south property line and also a chain link fence constructed at the west and north side of the property, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence in the rear or side yard area can be constructed to a height of 2 metres. (See Attachments 1 and 3).
A wrought iron fence measuring approximately 1.15 metres in height was constructed on top of a existing brick wall fence that was built sometime in the early 1900s, along the south property line. The brick wall fence varies in height from approximately 2.25 metres at the east side to 2.71 metres at the west side, due to the slope of the grade. The brick wall fence measures approximately 59.44 metres in length. The combined height of the wrought iron and brick fence varies in height from 3.40 metres at the east side and 3.86 metres at the west side, due the slope of the grade.
A 3.05 metre high chain link fence was built at the north west corner as an extension to an existing chain link fence for a distance of 10.97 metres along the west property line and 22.25 metres along the north property line. |
Background Information |
TE31.35 - Staff Report - 40 Burton Avenue - Fence Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26872.pdf) TE31.35 - Staff Report - 40 Burton Avenue- Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26873.pdf) TE31.35 - Staff Report - 40 Burton Avenue - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26874.pdf) TE31.35 - Staff Report - 40 Burton Avenue - Attachment 3 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26875.pdf) TE31.35 - Staff Report - 40 Burton Avenue - Attachment 4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26876.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 9, 2010) E-mail from Joe Shlesinger (TE.New.TE31.35.1) |
TE31.36 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 22 |
Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 91 Hillsdale Avenue West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the report dated January 19, 2010, from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District, respecting the request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 91 Hillsdale Avenue West, until the meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council to be held on April 27, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 19, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards Division, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The applicant, being the property owner, is seeking an exemption to the provisions of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences, Section 447-2(B), to permit an existing wooden fence in the rear yard, to exceed the maximum allowable height. The Fence By-law provides that a fence in the rear or side yard area can be constructed to a height of 2 metres.
The wooden fence has been constructed in the rear yard on the south, east and west sides. The fence at the south side measures approximately 10.90 metres in length and 2.60 metres in height. The fence at the east side measures approximately 11.90 metres in length and varies from approximately 2.40 to 2.70 metres in height, due to slope of the grade. The fence at the west side measures approximately 13.70 metres in length and varies from approximately 2.60 to 3.00 metres in height, due to the slope of the grade. (Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) |
Background Information |
TE31.36 - Staff Report - 91 Hillsdale Avenue West - Fence Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26878.pdf) TE31.36 - Staff Report - 91 Hillsdale Avenue West - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26879.pdf) TE31.36 - Staff Report - 91 Hillsdale Avenue West - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26880.pdf) TE31.36 - Staff Report - 91 Hillsdale Avenue West - Attachment 3 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26881.pdf) TE31.36 - Staff Report - 91 Hillsdale Avenue West - Attachment 4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26882.pdf) TE31.36 - Staff Report - 91 Hillsdale Avenue West - Attachment 5 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26883.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 8, 2010) E-mail from Gord and Sarah Miller (TE.New.TE31.36.1) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from David Van and Betty Chan (TE.New.TE39.36.2) |
TE31.37 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences at 18 Bright Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council granted the fence exemption at 18 Bright Street, with the condition that when the fence is replaced it should be constructed in compliance with Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences or its successor by-law. |
Origin |
(January 19, 2010) Report from the Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider a request by the owner of 18 Bright Street to be exempted from Chapter 447– Fences, Section 447-3 C 2(a). This section states that the maximum height of a fence in the rear yard cannot exceed 2 metres.
The existing fence, constructed of solid wood and posts stands approximately 2.28 metres, in height and approximately 14.17 metres in length, along the north property line. |
Background Information |
TE31.37 - Staff Report - 18 Bright Street - Fence Exemption (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26884.pdf) TE31.37 - Staff Report - 18 Bright Street - Attachment 1 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26885.pdf) TE31.37 - Staff Report - 18 Bright Street - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26886.pdf) |
TE31.38 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 20 |
Privacy Fence - 109 Walmer Road |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the maintenance of a closed board wooden privacy fence, with a wrought-iron arbour, measuring 2.93 m in height over each gate, 2.09 m in height on the Bernard Avenue flank and 1.93 m in height fronting 109 Walmer Avenue, subject to the owners entering into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, agreeing to but not limited to the following:
a. maintain the privacy fence with arbours at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
b. remove the privacy fence with arbours upon receiving 90 days' written notice to do so; and
c. accept such additional conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager of Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. Directed Legal Services and/or the General Manager of Transportation Services to extend the Encroachment Agreement to the new owner, in the event of sale or transfer to the property abutting the encroachment, subject to the approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed a request from the owners of 109 Walmer Avenue for the maintenance of a closed board wooden privacy fence with a wrought-iron arbour, measuring 2.93 m in height over each gate, 2.09 m in height on the Bernard Avenue flank and 1.93 m in height fronting 109 Walmer Road.
Although the fence exceeds the allowable height under the Municipal Code, it does not impact negatively on the public right of way. Transportation Services recommends approval of the privacy fence at this location.
The owners together with any interested parties will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council. |
Background Information |
TE31.38 - Staff Report - 109 Walmer Road - Privacy Fence (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26887.pdf) TE31.38 - Staff Report - 109 Walmer Road - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26888.pdf) |
TE31.39 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Appeal of the Denial of a Boulevard Cafe Permit Located at 505 College Street, Palmerston Avenue Flankage |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for the proposed cafe at 505 College Street, Palmerston Avenue flankage.
2. Requested the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council in one year’s time on the operation of the boulevard café at 505 College Street, Palmerston Avenue flankage. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the results of a public poll and refusal to issue a permit by the Municipal Licensing and Standards, based on the results of the public poll conducted in the matter, of an application for a boulevard café permit at 505 College Street, Palmerston Avenue flankage. |
Background Information |
TE31.39 - Staff Report - 505 College-Palmerston Flankage - Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26889.pdf) TE31.39 - Staff Report - 505 College-Palmerston Flankage - Appendices 1-5 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26890.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 7, 2010) E-mail from Natasha N. Mazzola (TE.New.TE31.39.1) (February 7, 2010) E-mail from Luc Frappier, Executive Producer, Spy Films (TE.New.TE31.39.2) (February 7, 2010) E-mail from Kerri Dixon (TE.New.TE31.39.3) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from John and Carole Dixon (TE.New.TE31.39.4) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Jeff and Christine Peterson (TE.New.TE31.39.5) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Brian Fawcett (TE.New.TE31.39.6) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Jessica Goldberg (TE.New.TE31.39.7) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Lesle Gibson, Grace Restaurant (TE.New.TE31.39.8) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Tony Marino (TE.New.TE31.39.9) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Meghan Kropf (TE.New.TE31.39.10) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Garner Kinmond (TE.New.TE31.39.11) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Andrea K. Wobick (TE.New.TE31.39.12) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Mike D'Abramo (TE.New.TE31.39.13) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Patrick Weir, Chief Creative Officer, Weir Creative (TE.New.TE31.39.14) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Tom Eymundson (TE.New.TE31.39.15) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Damian Murua (TE.New.TE31.39.16) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Richard Cureton (TE.New.TE31.39.17) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from James d'Ombrain (TE.New.TE31.39.18) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Stephen Tapp (TE.New.TE31.39.19) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Simon Davies (TE.New.TE31.39.20) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Cheryl Butson (TE.New.TE31.39.21) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Eli Craig, General Manager, Traffik Group (TE.New.TE31.39.22) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Jessie Sweeney (TE.New.TE31.39.23) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Lydia Canning, Women's Auxiliary, Hospital for Sick Children (TE.New.TE31.39.24) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Flo Leung and Dustin Gallagher (TE.New.TE31.39.25) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Max Valiquette (TE.New.TE31.39.26) (February 8, 2010) E-mail from Julie Krawchuk and Hugh Ralph (TE.New.TE31.39.27) (February 9, 2010) E-mail from Eric Beynon (TE.New.TE31.39.28) (February 9, 2010) E-mail from Alison Meikle and Damon Redfern (TE.New.TE31.39.29) |
TE31.40 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Appeal of the Denial of a Boulevard Cafe Permit Located at 593 College Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the proposed boulevard café permit at 593 College Street.
2. Directed the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, at the City's cost:
a. to move the sign pole westwards so that it aligns with the lighting standard; and b. relocate the bicycle rack. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the denial of an application received on May 7, 2009 from the business owner, representing Trattoria Giancarlo Inc, operating as Trattoria Giancarlo for a boulevard café located at 593 College Street. |
Background Information |
TE31.40 - Staff Report - 593 College Street - Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26891.pdf) TE31.40 - Staff Report - 593 College Street - Appendices 1-4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26892.pdf) |
TE31.41 | ACTION |
Amended |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Appeal of the Denial of a Boulevard Cafe Permit Application Located at 780 Queen Street West, Gore Vale Avenue Flankage |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for the proposed boulevard café at 780 Queen Street West.
2. Directed that the applicant plant, and ensure the survival of, at the applicant’s expense, a full shade canopy tree to the satisfaction of the Director, Urban Forestry and City Forester. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the results of a public poll and refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards, based on the results of the public poll and physical criteria inspection conducted in the matter, of an application for a boulevard café permit on the Gore Vale Avenue flankage of 780 Queen Street West as requested by the Deputy Mayor. |
Background Information |
TE31.41 - Staff Report - 780 Queen Street West - Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26893.pdf) TE31.41 - Staff Report - 780 Queen Street West - Appendices 1-4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26894.pdf) |
TE31.42 | ACTION |
Deferred |
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
Approval of a Boulevard Cafe Permit Located at 1192 Queen Street East, Curzon Street Flankage to be Issued to a New Business Owner |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the report dated January 21, 2010, from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, respecting the Approval of a Boulevard Café Permit Located at 1192 Queen Street East, Curzon Street Flankage to be Issued to a New Business Owner, until its next meeting to be held on March 9, 2010.
2. Requested the owner of the property to meet with staff from City Planning's Urban Design unit to consider a design that maximizes greening, including trees, and minimizes the paved area, and that this design be submitted to the March 9, 2010, meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council as part of the approval.
3. Requested staff of Municipal Licensing and Standards, Transportation Services, and the Public Realm Office to identify all Right of Way flankages, with or without patio permits, in the area of Ward 30, comprised of Coxwell to the east, Queen Street to the south, Jones Avenue to the west and Gerrard Street to the north, and, in conjunction with the local tree advocacy organization BOLD, review these flankages for possible tree planting, pavement removal and other green and environmental improvements. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Report from the Manager, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on an application from a new business owner for a boulevard café permit located at 1192 Queen Street East, Curzon Street flankage. |
Background Information |
TE31.42 - Staff Report - 1192 Queen Street East - Boulevard Cafe (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26895.pdf) TE31.42 - Staff Report - 1192 Queen Street East - Appendices 1-2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26896.pdf) |
TE31.43 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 20 |
Preliminary Report - 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West - Rezoning |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:
1. Staff continue to work with the applicant to achieve a height and built form that is consistent with the policies and goals of the King-Spadina Secondary Plan and the King Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This application was made on August 7, 2009 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a 29-storey mixed use building at 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West, at a height of approximately 98.6 m. The proposal originally included approximately 297 residential units and 171 hotel suites, with a restaurant at grade, however, staff understand that the hotel use may not be going forward and that the project may undergo some redesign. Parking for vehicles and bicycles is proposed to be provided in four below-grade levels.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application.
Staff do not support the application in its current form but would like to work with the applicant to resolve issues. Staff have indicated to the applicant that the height and massing of the proposal is not appropriate in the context of King-Spadina’s policy framework and the goals of preserving heritage fabric and scale. The site is located within the Warehouse District as identified in the recent King Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study, and is not a location appropriate for the proposed height, which exceeds the permitted height by more than 60 metres. In addition to the height, the tower floor plate creates a large building mass that could overwhelm the prevailing built form and heritage context of Richmond and Peter Streets.
A community consultation meeting was held on January 19, 2010.
Staff will seek to work with the applicant to achieve changes that will result in a proposal that is appropriate for the Warehouse District. It is anticipated that a final report for the subject application will be submitted in mid-2010. |
Background Information |
TE31.43 - Staff Report - 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26912.pdf) |
Communications |
(February 1, 2010) Fax from M. Meyer Elkaim (TE.New.TE31.43.1) |
TE31.44 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 27 |
Preliminary Report - 1000 Bay Street - Rezoning Application |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:
1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(January 13, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This application was made on or before December 23, 2009, and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
An application to amend Zoning By-law 438-86 has been submitted to permit a mixed-use development of 32 storeys consisting of 13 storeys for a hotel and 19 storeys (99 units) for a residential condominium at 1000 Bay Street.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
The next step is to undertake a community engagement process, which will include an initial open house/community meeting enabling the public to review the applicant’s submission, and ask questions of City staff and the applicant. |
Background Information |
TE31.44 - Staff Report - 1000 Bay Street - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26914.pdf) |
TE31.45 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 32 |
Preliminary Report - 580 to 592 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:
1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act. |
Origin |
(January 6, 2010) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This application was made on or after January 1, 2007, and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
This application proposes a six-storey, 47-unit apartment building with underground parking at 580 to 592 Kingston Road.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
A community consultation meeting will be scheduled in the first quarter of 2010.
The application has been circulated to City departments and external agencies, where appropriate, for comment. |
Background Information |
TE31.45 - Staff Report - 580 to 592 Kingston Road - Preliminary Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26915.pdf) |
TE31.46 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 14 |
Sign Variance - 2340 Dundas Street West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the requested variances to permit, for identification purposes, a non- illuminated fascia sign at the third floor level, on a west facing wall of the building at 2340 Dundas Street West.
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official; and
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 13, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Glen Walsh of Culture Link Settlement Services for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, a non- illuminated fascia sign at the third floor level, on a west facing wall of the building at 2340 Dundas Street West. Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.46 - Staff Report - 2340 Dundas Street West - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26916.pdf) |
TE31.47 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 19 |
Sign Variance - 740 Dupont Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the requested variance to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated fascia sign to represent “Rolls Royce” on the west elevation of the building at 740 Dupont Street on a condition that the sign is turned off from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. by means of an automated timing device and require that energy efficient lights be used.
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official; and
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Sylvia Liao of Steel Art Signs, on behalf of Geneen Automobiles Ltd., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated fascia sign to identify “Rolls Royce” on the west elevation of the building at 740 Dupont Street.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.47 - Staff Report - 740 Dupont Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26917.pdf) |
TE31.48 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 20 |
Sign Variance - 371 Bloor Street West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the requested variance to extend the permission to maintain, for the University of Toronto Schools, two temporary non-illuminated first party fascia signs for Centennial celebrations, on the north and west elevations of the building at 371 Bloor Street West for a period of 18 months from the date of approval.
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official;
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010; and
c. that the signs be removed after the 18-month temporary approval. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Willy Wong, on behalf of University of Toronto, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to extend the permission to maintain, for the University of Toronto Schools, two temporary non-illuminated first party fascia signs for Centennial celebrations, on the north and west elevations of the building at 371 Bloor Street West for a period of 18 months from the date of approval.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.48 - Staff Report - 371 Bloor Street West - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26918.pdf) |
TE31.49 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 333 Bay Street |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the requested variance to permit, for identification purposes, replacement of an existing illuminated pedestal sign with a newly designed pedestal sign containing an electronic message and animated display copy along the Bay Street frontage of the property at 333 Bay Street and require that:
i. energy efficient lights be used; and ii. the sign be set back a minimum of 0.15 m from the west property line.
2. City Council direct the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official; and
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval, be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Catherine Biesma of Goodmans LLP, on behalf of Exchange Tower Limited and Brookfield Properties Limited, for approval of a variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, replacement of an existing illuminated pedestal sign with a newly designed pedestal sign containing an electronic message and animated display copy along the Bay Street frontage of the property at 333 Bay Street.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variance is minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.49 - Revised Staff Report - 333 Bay Street - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26920.pdf) |
TE31.50 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 620 Dundas Street East |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the requested variances to permit, for identification purposes, a temporary non- illuminated ground sign for a period of two years from the date of approval along the Dundas Street East frontage of the property at 620 Dundas Street East.
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official.
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Amanda Kosloski with Daniels Construction Corporation for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, a non- illuminated ground sign along the Dundas Street East frontage of the property, for a period of two years from the date of approval, at 620 Dundas Street East.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.50 - Staff Report - 620 Dundas Street East - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26921.pdf) |
TE31.51 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Sign Variance - 121 King Street West |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the requested variances to permit, for identification purposes, two illuminated pedestal signs along King Street West frontage of the property, two illuminated fascia signs on the north elevation, one illuminated fascia sign on the south elevation and one fascia sign on the west elevation of the building at 121 King West and require that energy efficient lights be used.
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official; and
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Kirk Morozov, with Kramer Design Associates on behalf of Standard Life, for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, two illuminated pedestal signs along the building at 121 King Street West.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.51 - Staff Report - 121 King Street West - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26922.pdf) |
TE31.52 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
Sign Variance - 1195 Danforth Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the requested variances to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated ground sign on the northwest corner of the property at 1195 Danforth Avenue and require that energy efficient lights be used.
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official.
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Tae Ryuck with Goldberg Group on behalf of Imperial Oil Ltd., for approval of variances from Chapter 297, Signs, of the former City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit, for identification purposes, an illuminated ground sign on the northwest corner of the property at 1195 Danforth Avenue.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.52 - Staff Report - 1195 Danforth Avenue - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26923.pdf) |
TE31.53 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Sign Variance - 3003 Danforth Avenue |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for variances to maintain, for identification purposes, five illuminated fascia signs as replacement of the five previously existed fascia signs on these locations and require that energy efficient lights be used. The fascia signs “Metro” (A) and “24 Hrs” (B) are located on the north elevation and the fascia “Metro” (C) and “24 Hrs” (D) are located on the east elevation and the fascia sign “Metro” (E) is located on the southeast elevation of the building at 3003 Danforth Avenue (see graphics attached to the report dated January 12, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District).
2. Directed the City Clerk's Office to advise the applicant:
a. upon approval of a variance, of the requirement to obtain the necessary sign permits from the Chief Building Official; and
b. that the sign permit application related to this approval be filed with the Toronto Building Division prior to April 6, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 12, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report reviews and makes recommendations on a request by Christina Baudi with International Neon, for Metro Ontario Services, for approval of variances from By-law No. 64-87 of the former Borough of East York to maintain, for identification purposes, five illuminated fascia signs as replacement of the five existing illuminated fascia signs on these locations on the building, as identified on the attached graphics “Metro” and “24 Hrs” on the north elevation and “Metro” and “24 Hrs” on the east elevation and “Metro” on the southeast elevation of the building at 3003 Danforth Avenue.
Staff recommends approval of the application. The variances are minor and are within the general intent and purpose of the Municipal Code. |
Background Information |
TE31.53 - Staff Report - 3003 Danforth Avenue - Sign Variance (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26924.pdf) |
TE31.54 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 20 |
Naming of Public Lane Located South of Harbord Street, Extending Easterly, then Northerly from Major Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed that the public lane located south of Harbord Street, extending easterly, then northerly, from Major Street, be named “Louie Laki Lane”.
2. Authorized and directed the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction of a naming by-law. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the City Surveyor |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the community council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report recommends that the public lane located south of Harbord Street, extending easterly, then northerly from Major Street, be named “Louie Laki Lane”. |
Background Information |
TE31.54 - Staff Report - Naming of Public Lane Located South of Harbord Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26925.pdf) |
TE31.55 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Renaming of Wellesley Lane |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed that the public lane known as Wellesley Lane, extending westerly from Sherbourne Street to Wellesley Place, be renamed “Lourdes Lane”.
2. Authorized and directed the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction of a renaming by-law. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Report from the City Surveyor |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the community council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report recommends that the public lane known as Wellesley Lane be renamed “Lourdes Lane”. |
Background Information |
TE31.55 - Staff Report - Renaming of Wellesley Lane (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26926.pdf) |
TE31.56 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 18 |
Permanent Closure of the Easterly Portion of the Public Lane Abutting Premises No. 1006 Dufferin Street for Incorporation into the Dufferin Station Modernization |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council permanently close the portion of the public lane shown as Part 1 on the attached Sketch No. PS-2009-091 (the “Lane”), subject to:
a. easement interests for the easements required by Bell Canada and Rogers Cable being declared surplus in accordance with City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213 and authority having been granted to convey the easements to Bell Canada and Rogers Cable in and over the closed Lane for nominal consideration; and
b. compliance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162.
2. City Council authorize Transportation Services staff to give notice to the public, after authority has been granted to convey the required easements to Bell Canada and Rogers Cable, of a proposed by-law to close the Lane in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 162, with the Toronto and East York Community Council to hear any member of the public who wishes to speak to the matter during consideration of the draft by-law.
3. City Council authorize Transportation Services staff to advise the public of the proposed closure of the Lane prior to implementation, in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for Schedule A+ activities, by posting notice of the proposed closure on the notices page of the City’s website for at least five working days prior to the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting at which the proposed by-law to close the Lane will be considered. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
In conjunction with the modernization of Toronto Transit Commission’s Dufferin Station, Transportation Services staff was requested to investigate the feasibility of closing the easterly portion of the public lane abutting Premises No.1006 Dufferin Street to allow for the expansion of the Dufferin Station.
Transportation Services recommends that the easterly portion of the public lane abutting Premises No.1006 Dufferin Street be permanently closed. |
Background Information |
TE31.56 - Staff Report - Permanent Lane Closure Abutting 1006 Dufferin Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26928.pdf) TE31.56 - Staff Report - 1006 Dufferin Street - Sketch No. PS-2009-091 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26989.pdf) |
TE31.57 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Lane and Sidewalk Closure - The Esplanade |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the closure of the westbound direction and north sidewalk on The Esplanade, between Yonge Street and a point 40.8 metres east of Yonge Street, from February 10, 2010 to May 31, 2013.
2. Implemented “No Stopping Anytime” on the south side of The Esplanade, between Yonge Street and a point 40.8 metres east of Yonge Street.
3. Returned The Esplanade to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is completed. |
Origin |
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has the delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Ferncastle Front Street Inc. is constructing a 57-storey condominium on the north side of The Esplanade at 8 The Esplanade, between Yonge Street and Scott Street. Transportation Services has been requested to close the westbound direction and north sidewalk on The Esplanade for 40 months to facilitate construction.
As part of this same condominium project, Transportation Services has been requested to close the sidewalk and curb lane on the east side of Yonge Street. This issue is dealt with in a separate report “Lane and Sidewalk Closure – Yonge Street”, which requires City Council approval. |
Background Information |
TE31.57 - Staff Report - The Esplanade - Lane and Sidewalk Closure (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26929.pdf) TE31.57 - Staff Report - The Esplanade - Drawing No. 421F-9899 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26934.pdf) |
TE31.58 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 28 |
Lane and Sidewalk Closure - Yonge Street |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and curb lane on the east side of Yonge Street, between The Esplanade and Front Street, from February 24, 2010 to May 31, 2013.
2. City Council direct that Yonge Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is completed. |
Origin |
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
Ferncastle Front Street Inc. is constructing a 57-storey condominium on the north-east corner of Yonge Street and The Esplanade, at 8 The Esplanade. Transportation Services has been requested to close the curb lane and east sidewalk on Yonge Street for 40 months to facilitate construction.
As part of this same condominium project, Transportation Services has been requested to close the westbound direction and north sidewalk on The Esplanade. This issue is dealt with in a separate report “Lane and Sidewalk Closure – The Esplanade”, which requires Toronto and East York Community Council approval. |
Background Information |
TE31.58 - Staff Report - Yonge Street - Lane and Sidewalk Closure (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26930.pdf) TE31.58 - Staff Report - Yonge Street - Lane and Sidewalk - Drawing No. 421F-9899 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26933.pdf) |
TE31.59 | ACTION |
Deferred |
|
Ward: 28 |
Extension of Taxicab Stand - Richmond Street West, North Side, Between York Street and Bay Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the report dated January 18, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, respecting the Extension of Taxicab Stand – Richmond Street West, North Side, Between York Street and Bay Street, until its next meeting to be held on March 9, 2010.
2. Requested the appropriate staff from Transportation Services and City Planning, and the Ward Councillor to meet with representatives of the Sheraton Centre Toronto Hotel with respect to on-site taxi parking, and to ensure that all potential impacts of extending the taxicab stand on Richmond Street have been considered, and report on the outcome of this discussion to the meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council to be held on March 9, 2010. |
Origin |
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
The Sheraton Centre Toronto Hotel on January 1, 2010, closed the on-site taxicab facility in the Motor Court area of the hotel. The Motor Court is located on the west side of the hotel, with access previously provided for taxis from York Street via a driveway between Queen Street West and Richmond Street West. As a result, taxis which typically would have waited on-site for their fares will need to be relocated off the hotel property.
Transportation Services is seeking authority to extend the easterly limit of the existing 2-vehicle taxicab stand, located on the north side of Richmond Street West east of York Street, to provide three additional taxicab spaces. In order to provide 3 additional taxicab spaces, the bus pickup/drop off zone will need to be reduced by 16.5 metres. This change will not impact significantly on bus loading/unloading operations. |
Background Information |
TE31.59 - Staff Report - Richmond Street West - Extension of Taxicab Stand (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26931.pdf) TE31.59 - Staff Report - Richmond Street West - Drawing No. 421F-9897 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26932.pdf) |
TE31.60 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 18, 19 |
Parking Amendments - Dovercourt Road |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the “No Parking, from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation, on the west side of Dovercourt Road, from St. Anne’s Road to a point 121.9 metres south.
2. Rescinded the “One-hour Maximum Parking, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday” regulation, on the west side of Dovercourt Road, from a point 121.9 metres south of St. Annes Road to Harrison Street.
3. Introduced a “One-hour Maximum Parking, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday”, regulation on the west side of Dovercourt Road from St. Anne’s Road to Harrison Street. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting authority to rescind the “No Parking, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” regulation, on the west side of Dovercourt Road, from St. Anne’s Road to a point 121.9 metres south and introduce a “One-hour Maximum Parking, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday” regulation.
This change will not adversely impact traffic operation and will provide a total of about 15 additional parking spaces on this street during the daytime hours. |
Background Information |
TE31.60 - Staff Report - Dovercourt Road - Parking Amendments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26935.pdf) TE31.60 - Staff Report - Dovercourt Road - Drawing 421F-9904 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27022.pdf) |
TE31.61 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 18, 20, 32 |
Installation/Removal of On-Street Parking Spaces for Persons With Disabilities - February 2010 |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation and removal of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities at the locations identified in the attached Appendix A to the report dated January 20, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose is to obtain approval for the installation/removal of a number of on-street parking spaces for persons with disabilities. |
Background Information |
TE31.61 - Staff Report - On-Street Parking Spaces for Persons with Disabilities (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26936.pdf) |
TE31.62 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 28 |
Student Pick Up/Drop Off - Henry Lane Terrace |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing “No Parking Anytime” regulation on both sides of the northerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace between George Street South and the westerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace.
2. Prohibited parking at all times on the south side of the northerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace between George Street South and the westerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace.
3. Rescinded the existing “10-minute maximum parking limit from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Mon to Fri” regulation in effect on the north side of the northerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace between a point 12.5 metres west of George Street South and a point 34 metres further south.
4. Implemented a 10-minute maximum parking limit from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and from 3:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of the northerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace between a point 12.5 metres west of George Street South and a point 34 metres further west.
5. Prohibited parking on the north side of the northerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace between a point 12.5 metres west of George Street South and a point 34 metres further west from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 1:30 p.m. to 3:15 p.m., and from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 a.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday, and 12:01 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., Saturday to Monday. |
Origin |
(January 19, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is seeking authority to amend the parking regulations on the north side of the northerly roadway of Henry Lane Terrace, west of George Street South, to increase the afternoon times of the existing pick up/drop off zone, associated with Downtown Alternative School. |
Background Information |
TE31.62 - Staff Report - Henry Lane Terrace - Student Pick Up Drop Off (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26937.pdf) TE31.62 - Staff Report - Henry Lane Terrace - Drawing No. 421F-9902 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26973.pdf) |
TE31.63 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 30 |
School Zone - Leslie Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing 10-minute maximum parking limit from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the east side of Leslie Street between a point 234 metres north of Queen Street East and a point 91.4 metres further north.
2. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Leslie Street between a point 234 metres north of Queen Street East and a point 91.4 metres further north.
3. Implemented a 10-minute maximum parking limit from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except July, August, and public holidays on the east side of Leslie Street between a point 47.5 metres south of Dundas Street East and a point 53 metres further south.
4. Prohibited parking from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except July, August, and public holidays on the east side of Leslie Street between a point 47.5 metres south of Dundas Street East and a point 53 metres further south. |
Origin |
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is seeking authority to amend the existing parking regulations on the east side of Leslie Street, south of Dundas Street East, to reduce the length and operating time of the 10-minute maximum parking student pick-up/drop-off zone opposite St. Joseph Catholic School. The change will provide additional on-street parking for area residents during school hours, and during the summer months. |
Background Information |
TE31.63 - Staff Report - Leslie Street - School Zone (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26938.pdf) TE31.63 - Staff Report - Leslie Street - School Zone - Drawing No. 421F-9895 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26939.pdf) |
TE31.64 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 29 |
Road Alteration - Lipton Avenue |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alteration of Lipton Avenue, generally as shown on Drawing 421F-9903 dated January 2010, attached to the report dated January 20, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to alter the roadway on Lipton Avenue to allow for the construction of a second exit from the Pape Subway Station, as part of the Toronto Transit Commission Pape Station Modernization Project. The proposed modifications include realigning the roadway on both sides of Lipton Avenue and the installation of a sidewalk on both sides and at the end of the roadway.
The proposal will allow for the second exit to Pape Station while maintaining all existing vehicular and pedestrian accesses on Lipton Avenue. The pedestrian sidewalks will be improved and neither maintenance operations nor parking regulations will be affected. |
Background Information |
TE31.64 - Staff Report - Lipton Avenue - Road Alteration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26940.pdf) TE31.64 - Staff Report - Lipton Avenue - Drawing 421F-9903 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26941.pdf) |
TE31.65 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 31 |
Realignment of Roadway - Lumsden Avenue at Eastdale Avenue |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alteration that realigns the roadway on Lumsden Avenue at Eastdale Avenue, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421F-9885 dated December 2009, attached to the report dated January 18, 2010, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
Origin |
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
Summary |
Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to alter the roadway at Lumsden Avenue and Eastdale Avenue to improve the pedestrian environment. The proposed modifications include realigning the roadway on both sides of Lumsden Avenue and Eastdale Avenue to accommodate the installation of a sidewalk.
The proposal will improve the pedestrian environment and will have minimal impact on the level of service provided to motorists and transit service on this section at Lumsden Avenue and Eastdale Avenue. Neighbourhood travel patterns and available parking will not be affected. |
Background Information |
TE31.65 - Staff Report - Lumsden Ave at Eastdale Ave - Realignment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26942.pdf) TE31.65 - Staff Report - Lumsden Avenue - Drawing 421F-9885 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26946.pdf) |
TE31.66 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 19 |
Sale of Vacant Land at the Rear of 55 Niagara Street |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council accept the Offer to Purchase from Maria Lourdes Caetano to purchase the City-owned parcel of vacant land, located at the rear of 55 Niagara Street, and being part of Block A, Plan 655, City West, designated as Part 4 on Plan 64R-15954, City of Toronto (the “Property”), in the amount of $9,332.62, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” to the report dated January 21, 2010, from the Chief Corporate Officer.
2. City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to accept the Offer to Purchase on behalf of the City.
3. City Council authorize a portion of the proceeds of closing be directed to fund the outstanding expenses related to the Property and the completion of the sale transaction.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable. |
Origin |
(January 21, 2010) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the sale of the City-owned parcel of vacant land known as part of 28 Bathurst Street and located at the rear of 55 Niagara Street.
Negotiations with Maria Lourdes Caetano have resulted in the Offer to Purchase that is being recommended for acceptance by the City.
The terms for completing the transaction as set out herein are considered to be fair, reasonable and reflective of market value. |
Background Information |
TE31.66 - Staff Report - Sale of Vacant Land at Rear of 55 Niagara Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26943.pdf) TE31.66 - Staff Report - 55 Niagara Street - Appendix A (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26944.pdf) TE31.66 - Staff Report - 55 Niagara Street - Appendix B (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26945.pdf) |
TE31.67 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 14, 18, 19, 20, 28, 32 |
Business Improvement Area (BIA) Boards of Management - Various Additions and Deletions |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved additions and deletions to the The Beach, Cabbagetown, Parkdale Village, Queen Street West and West Queen West BIA Boards of Management as set out in Attachment 1 to the report dated January 20, 2010, from the Director, Business Services.
2. Directed that Schedule A of the Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, be amended to reflect the changes to the BIA Board of Management. |
Origin |
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Director, Business Services |
Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend that Toronto and East York Community Council approve additions and deletions to The Beach, Cabbagetown, Parkdale Village, Queen Street West and West Queen West BIA Boards of Management. The Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make final decisions regarding BIA appointments. |
Background Information |
TE31.67 - Staff Report - BIA - Various Additions and Deletions (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26947.pdf) |
TE31.68 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 32 |
Resignation of Member of the Board of Management of Community Centre 55 |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council removed Mr. David Addison from the Board of Management of Community Centre 55. |
Origin |
(January 11, 2010) Letter from Bob Murdoch, Executive Director, Community Centre 55 |
Summary |
Advising that Mr. David Addison, recently appointed to the Board of Management of Community Centre 55, has declared a conflict of interest and consequently has resigned from the Board. |
Background Information |
TE31.68 - Letter from Executive Director, Community Centre 55 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26948.pdf) |
TE31.69 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: All |
Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to July 4, 2010 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council grant an exemption to the Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to operate a beer garden and to serve wine and hard liquor contingent upon the following conditions:
a. approval of the A.G.C.O.; b. approval of the Medical Officer of Health; c. compliance with the City of Toronto’s Municipal Alcohol Policy; and d. receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event i.e., building permit, noise by-law extension permit.
2. City Council grant permission to the Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to host “ticketed” performances and to solicit donations in support of their organization.
3. City Council grant permission to Camp Jumoke, Schizophrenia Society of Ontario and Autism Speaks Canada to solicit donations in support of their organizations.
4. City Council require that the various events compensate the City of Toronto through the Facilities and Real Estate Division for all the City of Toronto costs associated with the event. |
Origin |
(January 14, 2010) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
Summary |
It is recommended that Toronto and East York Community Council give exemption to the Camp Jumoke’s “Turtle Walk”, Schizophrenia Society of Ontario’s “Walk of Hope for Schizophrenia”, Autism Speaks Canada’s “Annual Ontario Walk Now for Autism”, request to solicit donations and the Toronto Downtown Jazz Society’s “Toronto Downtown Jazz Festival” request to solicit donations and operate a tented beer/wine garden in a “gated” event on Nathan Phillips Square. |
Background Information |
TE31.69 - Staff Report - Use of Nathan Phillips Square (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-26949.pdf) |
TE31.70 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
|
Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that, for liquor licensing purposes, City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests for:
1. a change in end time from 12:30 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. for the Toronto Alternative Arts and Fashion Week from April 20 to 25, 2010 at Liberty Village (1 Pardee Avenue); and
2. a liquor licence extension from 2:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. on February 27, 2010, for the Canadian Opera Company's Operanation 6 after-party, to be held at The Spoke Club, 600 King Street West, following the event at the Four Seasons Centre on February 26, 2010, until 1:00 a.m. |
Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be events of municipal significance:
1. Toronto's Festival of Beer to be held at Bandshell Park, Exhibition Place on August 5, 2010, from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., August 6, 2010, from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on August 7 and 8, 2010, from 12:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
2. 2010 Canadian National Exhibition and Horse Show to be held from August 2 to September 6, 2010, at Exhibition Place.
3. Second Harvest's Toronto Taste to be held on Sunday, June 13, 2010, at the Royal Ontario Museum, with an exterior portion spilling out onto Queen's Park Circle. |
Summary |
Seeking endorsement of events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes. |
Communications |
(January 22, 2010) Letter from Gabe Simms, Toronto's Festival of Beer Inc., requesting that the Toronto's Festival of Beer, to be held at Bandshell Park on the grounds of Exhibition Place on August 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2010, at the times outlined in the letter, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE31.70.1) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/comm/communicationfile-13515.pdf) (February 4, 2010) E-mail from Vanja Vasic, Executive Director, Toronto Alternative Arts and Fashion Week, requesting a change in end time from 12:30 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. for their event scheduled for April 20-25, 2010 at Liberty Village (1 Pardee Avenue), and which has received approval as an event of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes. (TE.New.TE31.70.2) (February 5, 2010) Letter from David Bednar, General Manager, CNE, requesting that the 2010 Canadian National Exhibition and Horse Show to be held from August 2 to September 6, 2010, be declared an event of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes. (TE.New.TE31.70.3) (February 8, 2010) Letter from Sarah Jarvis, Special Events Manager, Canadian Opera Company, requesting an extension of the liquor licence for the Canadian Opera Company's Operanation 6 after-party to be held at The Spoke Club, 600 King Street West on February 27, 2010 from 2:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., following the event at the Four Seasons Centre on February 26, 2010 until 1 a.m. (TE.New.TE31.70.4) (February 8, 2010) Letter from Rick Kaczmarek, Bloor-Yorkville BIA, requesting that Second Harvest's Toronto Taste event to be held on Sunday, June 13, 2010 at the ROM, with an exterior portion spilling out onto Queen's Park Circle, be declared an event of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes. (TE.New.TE31.70.5) |
TE31.71 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
Ward: 27 |
Sign Variance Expiry - 2 Carlton Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Building Official to report to its March 9, 2010, meeting on allowing the applicant to permanently maintain the two fascia signs at 2 Carlton Street, one on each Yonge Street (West) and Carlton (South) elevations of the building. |
Origin |
(January 29, 2010) Letter from Councillor Kyle Rae, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale |
Summary |
Forwarding a letter from the President of Print N' Promotion (Canada) Ltd. and the Vice-President of Northan Realty Advisors Limited regarding the expiry of the sign variance permit for 2 Carlton Street. |
Background Information |
TE31.71 - Staff Report - 2 Carlton Street Sign Variance Expiry (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27212.pdf) |
TE31.72 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 19 |
Renaming of "Harbord Park" to "Art Eggleton Park" |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Comunity Council requested the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to its March 9, 2010, meeting on the renaming of “Harbord Park” to “Art Eggleton Park”. |
Origin |
(February 1, 2010) Letter from Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone, Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina |
Summary |
Art Eggleton has served Torontonians at Toronto City Council, in the Canadian House of Commons and in the Senate for over thirty-five years. Raised and educated in Toronto, Mr. Eggleton first worked as an accountant before being elected to Toronto City Council in 1969, where he served for twenty-two years on the Executive Committee. Between 1973 and 1980, he served as City Budget Chief and also served on the Metropolitan Toronto Police Commission and the Board of the Canadian National Exhibition. He holds the distinction of being Toronto’s longest serving Mayor in holding office for eleven years from December 1, 1980 to November 30, 1991.
As members of the Toronto and East York Community Council may be aware, “Harbord Park” in Ward 19 has a name which is already featured in Toronto (Harbord Street). Furthermore, Harbord Park is in the Ward that Art Eggleton represented as the local Alderman.
I believe it is most appropriate that Mr. Art Eggleton, as Toronto’s longstanding Mayor and former area Councillor, be recognized with the naming of an “Art Eggleton Park” in the City of Toronto. |
Background Information |
TE31.72 - Letter from Deputy Mayor Pantalone - Renaming of Harbord Park (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27213.pdf) |
TE31.73 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 21 |
Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 7 Ava Road |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the scheduled Ontario Municipal Board hearing, and if necessary hire an outside planner, in support of the refusal of the variances regarding 7 Ava Road, Toronto. |
Origin |
(February 8, 2010) Member Motion from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's |
Summary |
On November 18, 2009, the Toronto and East York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused a minor variance application to construct a 2 1/2 storey rear and east side addition and one-storey bay window addition to the front of the dwelling at 7 Ava Road. The applicant has appealed the Committee of Adjustment decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and a hearing date has been set for March 2, 2010.
Community Planning wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment in opposition to this application because of increased density and insufficient setbacks.
This Motion is made to authorize the City Solicitor to attend the OMB hearing to oppose the appeal and uphold Community Planning’s recommendation and the Committee of Adjustment’s decision. |
Background Information |
TE31.73 - Member Motion from Councillor Mihevc -7 Ava Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27214.pdf) TE31.73 - 7 Ava Road - Attachment 1 - Notice of Committee of Adjustment Decision (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27215.pdf) TE31.73 - Staff Report - 7 Ava Road - Attachment 2 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27216.pdf) |
TE31.74 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 19 |
30 Ordnance Street (Ward 19) |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto anad East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to its April 27, 2010, meeting on an Official Plan Amendment filed in respect to the lands located at 30 Ordnance Street. |
Origin |
(February 5, 2010) Letter from Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone, Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina |
Summary |
The City of Toronto has received a submission from Diamond Corporation with regards to the possible redevelopment of 30 Ordnance Street. This redevelopment will follow the appropriate planning and consultative process, yet, in light of the significant public investment that is planned in the Fort York and Garrison Common North neighbourhoods as well as the issuance of the Notice of Completion for the adjacent Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (January 7, 2010 – as per the attachment to my letter), there is an opportunity and need for a quick direction report to ensure and maximize Public Realm opportunities. The Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, in part, noted the desire for a development plan that would govern the redevelopment of the Ordnance Triangle lands including its integration into the existing neighbourhood fabric. |
Background Information |
TE31.74 - Letter from Deputy Mayor Pantalone - 30 Ordnance Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27226.pdf) |
TE31.75 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 20 |
Liquor Licence - 14 Duncan Street - Park Lane (Formerly Venue Nightclub) - Licence 203858 |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
A. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Park Lane, 14 Duncan Street (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application unless the following conditions, in the form substantially set out below, are attached to the liquor licence:
Conditions to be attached to Liquor Licence for Park Lane, 14 Duncan Street, Toronto
Licence to Operate the Business
1. The applicant shall hold a valid business licence, issued by the City of Toronto, to operate a business of the class "Entertainment Facility - Night Club".
Patron and Public Safety
2. Security sweeps shall be done of all public areas before the club is opened to the public, and a record shall be kept certifying the same, including name and time of inspection and shall be available at the request of the Police or Liquor Inspectors.
3. Prior to opening, all doors will be alarmed except for the entrance doors (to be identified) and any doors to outside patron areas (to be identified).
4. At all times while the premises are open to patrons and for at least one hour after the premises are closed to patrons, the premises shall be staffed with at least one visibly identifiable security person for every 100 patrons on the premises.
5. The Licensee shall ensure that every entrance to the premises is staffed with at least one security person equipped with a fully operational metal detector. All persons, with no exceptions, shall be fully searched and pass through a metal detector upon entry into the premises.
6. All persons who re-enter the club from a smoking area or any other area that is publicly accessible at any time shall be subject to a full search and metal detection scan, with no exceptions.
7. The Licensee shall provide the name and contact information of the Head of Security and the General Manager of the premises to the Toronto Police Service, 52 Division, Plain Clothes Unit. One of the persons named in this clause shall be on the premises at all times when the premises are open to patrons.
8. At all times while the premises are open the Licensee shall ensure that there are clearly visible and functioning security cameras as described in the attached specification, entitled Night Club CCTV Requirements, (Attachment 1) The video surveillance system shall be checked prior to each opening to ensure that it is fully functional.
9. The Licensee shall retain all digital records from the security cameras for a minimum of 30 days. Any recording (or the Digital Video Recording unit) must be available immediately upon their request, and at no cost, to officers of the Toronto Police Service and to AGCO Inspectors.
10. The Licensee shall ensure that lighting is installed and is operational across the full width of the front, rear and any side of the premises that is accessible to the public. The light fixtures will provide illumination levels between 55 to 110 lumens for all such spaces. The Licensee shall further ensure that the lighting fixtures do not direct light into windows of surrounding structures. The licensee shall ensure that these lights are fully operational and turned on from the time of opening until sunrise the following day.
11. The Licensee may allow a line queue for people waiting to enter the premises. A barrier shall be used to clearly distinguish the area to be used for queuing from the remainder of the sidewalk which shall be maintained free and clear for passing pedestrians.
12. The Licensee shall ensure that a designated employee is on duty at all times to ensure that exiting patrons do not block the sidewalk and are not causing a disturbance that will affect nearby residents.
Impact on the Neighbourhood
13. The Licensee shall ensure that any sound resulting from the operation of the business is not audible beyond a reasonable distance from the lot line of the property on which the premise is located. This clause refers to sound that is generated by any internal or external loudspeakers, conversation by patrons within the premises, bussing, garbage disposal and bottle disposal. A reasonable distance for such sound to be considered in non-compliance is any point opposite the Licensee’s premises that is separated by a public street, public or private laneway or a parting wall between the Licensee’s premises and any adjacent space.
14. The Licensee shall post a prominent sign at each exit that reminds and/or encourages departing patrons to be considerate of the surrounding community.
15. The Licensee shall use best efforts to ensure that all areas immediately adjacent to the establishment are clean and free of litter, refuse and other debris.
16. The Licensee shall use best efforts to arrange garbage pickup and recycling at times that will not disturb nearby residents.
B. City Council request the AGCO to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
C. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
Origin |
(February 8, 2010) Member Motion from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina |
Summary |
1811357 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for premises at 14 Duncan Street operating under the name of Park Lane (the “Premises”). The Premises formerly operated as Venue Nightclub. The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for a capacity of 415 for the main floor and 260 for the basement. Previously the basement has not been included in the licensed area at the Premises.
The Premises is one of three licensed establishments located in the building at 14 Duncan Street and there is a history of Liquor Licence Act violations at all three. The liquor licence for the Premises was suspended on three separate occasions when it operated as Venue Nightclub. This includes a 30-day suspension of the licence in April, 2003 that stemmed from several Liquor Licence Act violations; a 35-day suspension in February, 2004 that stemmed from several overcrowding infractions; and a 7-day suspension in June, 2005 for permitting drunken patrons in the premises.
The Premises is located in the City’s entertainment district among a large concentration of night clubs. Area residents are concerned that any licensed establishment which has a history of problems for past licensees can only lead to problems in the future. Their concerns relate in particular to noise, litter, safety and security, and other disturbances to residents in the area.
This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. Given the large capacity being sought for the Premises, under no circumstance should it be granted a liquor sales licence without conditions attached. |
Background Information |
TE31.75 - Member Motion from Councillor Vaughan - Liquor Licence - 14 Duncan Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27232.pdf) |
TE31.76 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 27 |
Heritage Assessment of 17 Dundonald Street |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services to assess the building located at 17 Dundonald Street and report to the April 30, 2010, meeting of the Toronto Preservation Board on whether the building is worthy of listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage properties. |
Origin |
(February 8, 2010) Letter from Councillor Kyle Rae, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale |
Summary |
I am writing to request that Heritage Preservation Services assess the heritage merits of the building located at 17 Dundonald Street. The building is reflective of when modernism arrived in culturally conservative Toronto in the 1950s and 60s. With its detailed geometry, lack of ornament, and glass-and-concrete facade, the structure is a fantastic example of mid-century modernism. |
Background Information |
TE31.76 - Letter from Councillor Rae - 17 Dundonald Street - Heritage Assessment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27233.pdf) |
TE31.77 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 20 |
Renaming of Carr Street Parkette to Randy Padmore Park |
Committee Decision |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Requested the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on renaming Carr Street Parkette as Randy Padmore Park. |
Origin |
(February 9, 2010) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina |
Summary |
Randy Padmore, a dedicated leader and much-loved member of the Alexandra Park community, died unexpectedly in a tragic car accident on May 22, 2009. In partnership with members of the Padmore family, the Co-op Housing Federation of Toronto and members of the Alexandra Park community have requested that the City consider renaming Carr Street Parkette (at 47 Denison Avenue) in his honour. |
Background Information |
TE31.77 - Letter from Councillor Vaughan - Renaming of Carr Street Parkette (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27241.pdf) |
TE31.78 | ACTION |
No Action |
|
Ward: 20 |
Regulations to Deter Through Traffic Movement – Barton Avenue at Christie Street |
Committee Decision |
This item was not properly before the Toronto and East York Community Council. A Notice of Motion by City Council would be required to reopen Item TE27.76 - Regulations to Deter Through Traffic Movement - Barton Avenue at Christie Street, prior to any further consideration being given to rescinding the prohibition of left-turns at this location. |
Origin |
(February 9, 2010) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina |
Summary |
At its meeting on September 15, 2009, the Toronto and East York Community Council adopted the following:
- City Council prohibit left turns from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, (bicycles excepted) by southbound traffic from Christie Street onto Barton Avenue.
This regulation was supported by local residents who live on Barton Avenue and are concerned about the volume and speed of commuter traffic that cuts through the neighbourhood and poses a safety hazard to pedestrians, particularly children walking to school. Please see the staff report attached.
After the above turn restriction was approved, members of the broader community in Seaton Village contacted my office to express concerns about how the turn restriction would impact other streets in the neighbourhood. As a result, despite the turn restriction being passed, Transportation staff agreed to hold off on installing the turn restriction until I could conduct broader community consultation.
On February 3, 2010, I held a community meeting at Palmerston Public School. In addition, I encouraged residents to contact my office to share their feedback on the turn restriction. At the meeting, the community reached a consensus to rescind the turn restriction in favour of exploring and implementing other methods of slowing down traffic. |
Background Information |
TE31.78 - Letter from Councillor Vaughan - Prohibition of Left-Turns from Christie Street onto Barton Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27245.pdf) TE31.78 - Staff Report - TE27.76 - Barton Avenue at Christie Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27246.pdf) |
TE31.79 | ACTION |
Adopted |
|
Ward: 27 |
Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 150 Charles Street West (95 Queens Park) - Minor Variance Application A0643/09TEY |
Committee Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and other appropriate staff to attend a not yet scheduled Ontario Municipal Board hearing with respect to 150 Charles Street West (95 Queens Park), and take the position that the variances should not be granted unless the OMB imposes a condition requiring that the site is to be developed substantially in accordance with site plan drawing number A-001, date-stamped May 12, 2009 by City Planning, as submitted with site plan application 09 129916 STE 27 SA, illustrating site access from the laneway located to the north of the property. |
Origin |
(February 9, 2010) Member Motion from Councillor Kyle Rae, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale |
Summary |
At its meeting held on Wednesday, November 4, 2009, the Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel, approved minor variances necessary to facilitate the construction of a new three-storey student centre and make alterations to the existing two-storey building at 150 Charles Street West (95 Queens Park) - Minor Variance Application A0643/09TEY.
The requested variances to the zoning by-law were:
1. Section 12(2)310(a), By-law 438-86 A building fronting Charles Street east of Queen’s Park shall not be erected above grade closer to a street than 4.0 m. In this case, the proposed building above grade is setback 0.0 m from Charles Street.
2. Section 12(2)309(i), By-law 438-86 The gross floor area of an existing building can only be enlarged by within 5% (558.6 m2) of what existed on June 3, 1997. In this case, the gross floor area of the proposed enlargement will be equal to 18% (2000 m²) of the existing building.
3. Section 4(11)(c), By-law 438-86 A building is not permitted to be located to the front of a residential building creating a condition of having a residential building to the rear of another building. In this case, the proposed building will be located in front of a residential building.
Community Planning found the proposed variances acceptable provided that the site was to be developed in a manner that the University had presented to the City as filed through site plan application 09 129916 STE27 SA, which was being reviewed concurrently. The Committee of Adjustment approval was not conditional on the site plan. A copy of the Committee's decision is attached.
On November 27, 2009, the City received notification that minor variance application A0643/09TEY had been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by an interested party. A hearing date has not yet been set.
This motion has been prepared in conjunction with Legal Services and City Planning. |
Background Information |
TE31.79 - Motion from Councillor Rae - 150 Charles Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27249.pdf) TE31.79 - 150 Charles St West - Committee of Adjustment Decision (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27250.pdf) |
TE31.80 | ACTION |
Adopted |
Delegated |
|
Enactment of By-laws |
Committee Decision |
General Bills Toronto and East York Community Council enacted By-laws 168-2010 to 177-2010.
Confirmatory Bill Toronto and East York Community Council passed a Confirmatory Bill as By-law 178-2010. |
Summary |
Introduction and consideration of Bills for enactment as By-laws. |
Background Information |
TE31.80 - 2010-02-09 - Toronto and East York Community Council - By-law Index (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-27282.pdf) |
Meeting Sessions |
Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
2010-02-09 | Morning | 9:35 AM | 9:50 AM | Public |
2010-02-09 | Morning | 10:02 AM | 12:00 PM | Public |
2010-02-09 | Afternoon | 1:40 PM | 3:36 PM | Public |
Attendance | ||
Members were present for some or all of the time period indicated. |
Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
2010-02-09 9:35 AM - 9:50 AM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Bussin, Fletcher, McConnell (Chair), Mihevc, Ootes, Pantalone, Perks, Rae, Vaughan, Walker Not Present: Davis, Giambrone |
2010-02-09 10:02 AM - 12:00 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Bussin, Davis, Fletcher, McConnell (Chair), Mihevc, Ootes, Pantalone, Perks, Rae, Vaughan, Walker Not Present: Giambrone |
2010-02-09 1:40 PM - 3:36 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Bussin, Davis, Fletcher, McConnell (Chair), Mihevc, Ootes, Pantalone, Perks, Rae, Vaughan, Walker Not Present: Giambrone |